Torontohye124-February-Cmprs-2016.Pdf
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Identical Letters Dated 27 April 2016 from the Chargé D’Affaires A.I
United Nations A/70/849–S/2016/398 General Assembly Distr.: General 28 April 2016 Security Council Original: English General Assembly Security Council Seventieth session Seventy-first year Agenda items 35 and 40 Protracted conflicts in the GUAM area and their implications for international peace, security and development The situation in the occupied territories of Azerbaijan Identical letters dated 27 April 2016 from the Chargé d’affaires a.i. of the Permanent Mission of Azerbaijan to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General and the President of the Security Council Further to the letter from the Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Azerbaijan, Elmar Mammadyarov, dated 20 April 2016, on the recent escalation of the situation at the line of contact of the armed forces of Armenia and Azerbaijan and the border between the two States, I would like to draw your attention to the latest gross violation by the armed forces of the Republic of Armenia of the ceasefire agreement of 5 April 2016, reached in Moscow between the Chiefs of the General Staff of the Armed Forces of the Republic of Azerbaijan and the Republic of Armenia, with the assistance of the Chief of the General Staff of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation. The armed forces of Armenia, while concentrating additional forces and military equipment at the line of contact, starting from 23 April 2016, fired intensively on the positions of the armed forces of Azerbaijan and the civilian settlements near the confrontation line using large-calibre weapons, mortars, grenade launchers and heavy artillery. -
REPORT on Physical Audit of Construction Projects for 2016 “Hayastan” All Armenian Fund
"NORASHEN" design and technology production cooperative REPORT on physical audit of construction projects for 2016 “Hayastan” All Armenian Fund Yerevan – 2017 Report on physical audit of construction projects of “Hayastan” All-Armenian Fund for 2016 Table of Content Name of the construction project Page REPORT (general provisions) on physical audit of construction projects of “Hayastan” All Armenian Fund for 2016 4 1. Reconstruction works of RA Yerevan city musical school named after P. Tchaykovskiy 7 2. Reconstruction works of RA Armavir region Nalbandyan village secondary school 14 3. Construction of RA Tavush marz Khachardzan village secondary school gym 21 4. Reconstruction works of RA Tavush marz Khachardzan village water supply system 28 5. Construction of RA Tavush marz Baghanis community irrigation system 32 6. Renovation works of RA Tavush marz Kirants, Yenokavan, Lusadzor, Nerqin Tsaghkavan, Sarigyugh, Sevqar communities roads leading to distant pastures 35 7. Construction works of the oncological center in NKR Stepanakert city 39 8. Reconstruction works of the school No. 9 in NKR Stepanakert city and renovation works of the garden 46 9. Construction of NKR Martuni region Sos village 300-seat secondary school 51 10. Construction works of NKR Martakert region Kochoghut village 150-seat assembly house 59 11. Construction of NKR Shushi region Qarin tak village 50-seat kindergarten 66 12. Construction of a house for G. and L. Avanesyans in NKR Martakert region Martakert town 71 13. Construction of a house for I. Hovsepyan and R. Sahakyan in NKRAskeran region Avetaranots village 75 14. Construction of a house for T. and M. Baghdasaryans in NKR Martuni region Chartar village 78 15. -
Yukarı Karabağ'da 44 Günde Gelen Zafer
Yukarı Karabağ’da 44 Günde Gelen Zafer: TÜRKIYE-AZERBAYCAN KARDEŞLIĞININ NIŞANESI Victory in Nagorno-Karabakh after 44 Days: THE TOKEN OF THE TURKEY-AZERBAIJAN BROTHERHOOD Победа в Нагорном Карабахе за 44 дня: ДОКАЗАТЕЛЬСТВО БРАТСТВА ТУРЦИИ И АЗЕРБАЙДЖАНА Yukarı Karabağ’da 44 Günde Gelen Zafer: TÜRKIYE-AZERBAYCAN KARDEŞLIĞININ NIŞANESI Victory in Nagorno-Karabakh after 44 Days: THE TOKEN OF THE TURKEY-AZERBAIJAN BROTHERHOOD Победа в Нагорном Карабахе за 44 дня: ДОКАЗАТЕЛЬСТВО БРАТСТВА ТУРЦИИ И АЗЕРБАЙДЖАНА ISBN: 978-625-7779-91-3 Yukarı Karabağ’da 44 Günde Gelen Zafer: TÜRKIYE-AZERBAYCAN KARDEŞLIĞININ NIŞANESI Victory In Nagorno-Karabakh After 44 Days: THE TOKEN OF THE TURKEY-AZERBAIJAN BROTHERHOOD Победа в Нагорном Карабахе за 44 дня: ДОКАЗАТЕЛЬСТВО БРАТСТВА ТУРЦИИ И АЗЕРБАЙДЖАНА © 2021 CUMHURBAŞKANLIĞI İLETİŞİM BAŞKANLIĞI YAYINLARI © 2021 PUBLICATIONS BY PRESIDENCY’S DIRECTORATE OF COMMUNICATIONS © 2021 ИЗДАНИЯ УПРАВЛЕНИЯ КОММУНИКАЦИИ ПРИ АДМИНИСТРАЦИИ ПРЕЗИДЕНТА Yayıncı Sertifika No: 45482 | Publication Certificate No.: 45482 | Сертификат издателя № 45482 1. Baskı, İstanbul, 2021 | 1st Edition, Istanbul | 1 Издание, Стамбул İletişim | Contact | Контакты Kızılırmak Mahallesi Mevlana Bulv. No:144 Çukurambar Ankara/TÜRKİYE T +90 312 590 20 00 | [email protected] Baskı | Print | Печать Prestij Grafik Rek. ve Mat. San. ve Tic. Ltd. Şti. T 0 212 489 40 63, İstanbul Matbaa Sertifika No: 45590 Yukarı Karabağ’da 44 Günde Gelen Zafer: TÜRKIYE-AZERBAYCAN KARDEŞLIĞININ NIŞANESI Yukarı Karabağ’da 44 Günde Gelen Zafer: TÜRKIYE-AZERBAYCAN KARDEŞLIĞININ NIŞANESI Victory In Nagorno-Karabakh After 44 Days: THE TOKEN OF THE TURKEY-AZERBAIJAN BROTHERHOOD Победа в Нагорном Карабахе за 44 дня: ДОКАЗАТЕЛЬСТВО БРАТСТВА ТУРЦИИ И АЗЕРБАЙДЖАНА İÇİNDEKİLER CONTENTS СОДЕРЖАНИЕ 1. Önsöz Recep Tayyip Erdoğan 07 Preface Recep Tayyip Erdoğan 101 Предисловие Recep Tayyip Erdoğan 199 1. -
Nagorno-Karabakh: a New Turkish Front Against Russia ? Pierre Razoux Academic and Research Director of the FMES Institute
13.10.2020 Nagorno-Karabakh: a new Turkish front against Russia ? Pierre Razoux Academic and Research Director of the FMES Institute ABSTRACT By encouraging Azeri President Ilham Aliyev in his attempt to regain Nagorno-Karabakh, President Erdogan opened a new front facing the Kremlin to boast a symbolic success with his population and to force Vladimir Putin to accept a compromise on the other Syrian, Libyan, Mediterranean and energy fronts. This strategy is not without risk because the conflict could spread to the secessionist republics of South Ossetia and Abkhazia in neighbouring Georgia. Above all, it could provoke an escalation of tensions with Iran. The relatively even military balance between Armenia and Azerbaijan does not allow either of the two belligerents to conduct a victorious blitzkrieg against the territory of the other, a fortiori in the very mountainous Nagorno-Karabakh. Any confrontation will structurally lead to a war of attrition, leaving time for the Turkish and Russian presidents to negotiate. Forcing his luck, Recep Tayyip Erdogan could be tempted to annex the northern part of Cyprus soon, exchanging his disengagement from the South Caucasus for the silence of the Kremlin. By encouraging Azeri President Ilham Aliyev in his attempt to reconquer the secessionist province of Nagorno-Karabakh defended by Armenia (launched on September 27, 2020), has President Recep Tayyip Erdogan voluntarily opened a new front against the Kremlin to force Vladimir Putin to find a compromise on the other Syrian, Libyan, Mediterranean and energy fronts? It must be noted that the counteroffensive of Fayez el-Sarraj in Libya, supported by the Turkish President, is trampling on in front of Sirte1, that the battle of Idlib is not turning to the advantage of pro-Turkish forces in Syria - even if the death-blow of the Syrian regime, supported by Moscow, is slow in coming - and that Turkey has had to back-pedal in the Eastern Mediterranean under triple pressure from the United States, NATO2 and the Europeans3. -
Coi Chronology
COI CHRONOLOGY Country of Origin ARMENIA, AZERBAIJAN Main subject The course of the Nagorno-Karabakh armed conflict and its impact on the civilian population Date of completion 10 November 2020 Disclaimer This chronology note has been elaborated according to the EASO COI Report Methodology and EASO Writing and Referencing Guide. The information provided in this chronology has been researched, evaluated and processed with utmost care within a limited time frame. All sources used are referenced. A quality review has been performed in line with the above mentioned methodology. This document does not claim to be exhaustive neither conclusive as to the merit of any particular claim to international protection. If a certain event, person or organisation is not mentioned in the report, this does not mean that the event has not taken place or that the person or organisation does not exist. Terminology used should not be regarded as indicative of a particular legal position. The information in this chronology does not necessarily reflect the opinion of EASO and makes no political statement whatsoever. The target audience is caseworkers, COI researchers, policy makers, and asylum decision-making authorities. The chronology was finalised on 10 November 2020 and will be updated according to the development of the situation in the region. COI CHRONOLOGY Background Nagorno-Karabakh is a mountainous landlocked region within the borders of Azerbaijan1 and is mainly inhabited by ethnic Armenians.2 Recognized under international law as a part of Azerbaijan, -
Armenia-Fund-Annual-Report-2005.Pdf
I believe we are the most fortunate generation of Armenians in a thousand years. I know that many people will be astounded by that statement. All of us are painfully aware of how difficult the last 15 years have been for the people of Armenia and Nagorno-Karabakh. Despite all the difficulties that all of us are aware of, it is important for us to appreciate the efforts of the greater Armenian-American Diaspora in rebuilding the Homeland. After nearly a thousand years of foreign domination and ninety years after the genocide of our people, we are not only still here. But we are here and given the privilege and the right that so many have struggled for, to build a new nation, a new Armenia that we can all be proud of. Armenia Fund has been the primary conduit of such efforts of the Armenian-American Diaspora. With a strong supporter base in the Western United States, Armenia Fund has overcome challenges in the homeland by meeting urgent needs and cementing long term developments. Thanks to its global network of affiliates in more than 19 countries, Armenia Fund continues to bring together individuals, major com- munity organizations and share the common goal of providing a secure future for the Armenian nation. Our efforts were clearly shown, once again, during our 2005 Telethon when we registered the highest rate of participation amongst members of the public. This demonstrated, yet again, that Armenia Fund remains the premier non-profit humanitarian organization in rendering vital infrastructure development projects in Armenia and Karabakh. -
Aggression of the Republic of Armenia Against the Republic of Azerbaijan
1 AGGRESSION OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA AGAINST THE REPUBLIC OF AZERBAIJAN Historical background. The Nagorny Karabakh region of the Republic of Azerbaijan is part of the geographical area called Garabagh (Qarabağ). The name of this part of the country consists of two Azerbaijani words: "qara" (black) and "bag" (garden).1 The geographical area of Karabakh covers the lands from the Araz River in the south to the Kur River in the north, and from the junction of the Kur and Araz Rivers in the east to the eastern ranges of the Lesser Caucasus in the west. From ancient times up to the occupation by Russian Empire in the early 19th century, this region was part of different Azerbaijani states. On 14 May 1805, the Treaty of Kurakchay (1805) between Ibrahim Khan, Khan of Karabakh, and Sisianov, representative of the Russian Emperor, was signed. According to this treaty, the Karabakh khanate came under the Russian rule. The Gulustan peace treaty, signed between Russian Empire and Persia on 12 October 1813, de jure recognized the joining to Russia of the Northern Azerbaijan khanates, with the exception of the Nakhchyvan and Iravan khanates. According to the Turkmanchay peace treaty, signed on 10 February 1828 - at the end of the second Russian-Persian war (1826-1828) - Iran confirmed its relinquishment of Northern Azerbaijan, including the Nakhchyvan and Iravan khanates. After the signing of the Gulustan and Turkmanchay treaties a very rapid mass resettlement of Armenians in the Azerbaijani lands took place and the subsequent artificial territorial division emerged. The First World War also contributed to the increase in the number of Armenians in the South Caucasus. -
Artsakhreport-RS ENG.Pdf
Report on Short-term Observation of the Elections of Local Self-government Bodies in the Republic of Artsakh on 8 September 2019 “Union of Informed Citizens Stepanakert Office” NGO Stepanakert 2019 The observation mission of the local self-government body elections in the Republic of Artsakh held on 8 September 2019 and compilation of the current report have been conducted within the framework of the grant awarded by the Government of the Republic of Armenia (RA). Viewpoints expressed in the following Report may be contrary to those of the funding body. 3 Contents Introduction 5 Accessibility and Furnishing of the Polling Stations 6 Morning Session of Commission 7 Voting Process 9 Situation in the Polling Station Surroundings during the Voting Process 11 Calculation of Election Results 12 Media Monitoring 13 Summary 22 Recommendations 22 4 Introduction On 8 September 2019, during the elections of local self-government bodies in the Republic of Artsakh, a short-term observation mission was held in 40 polling stations by the “Union of Informed Citizens Stepanakert Office” in cooperation with the “Union of Informed Citizens” NGO. To examine the situation outside the polling stations as well as to prevent and settle problems in individual stations, 5 mobile observation groups were involved visiting 70 polling stations. 90 observers, 5 lawyers, 9 recorders and other specialists were engaged in the mission. Training for 100 observers was conducted within the scope the observation mission. In addition, trainings for police officers were organized jointly with the Police of the Republic of Artsakh. Furthermore, training videos for voters were made and broadcast on Artsakh television. -
Akhtamar on Line
1 Anno 14 Numero 280 1 marzo 2019 — CIV M.Y. Akhtamar on line In Armenia un mese intero per festeggiare le donne Oriana Fallaci diceva: “Essere donna è così affascinante. È un'avventura che richiede un tale coraggio, online una sfida che non annoia mai”. E per le donne armene le sfide non sono certo mancate. Sono state regine, principesse medievali, mogli e madri devote, attiviste, custodi della memoria e valorose guerriere a fianco degli uomini, ma anche sole a difendere le loro case e le loro famiglie. E se nel mondo la Festa della Donna è fissata in un solo giorno, l’8 marzo, in Armenia dura per un intero mese. Un mese per sottolineare l’importante ruolo delle donne nella società, per rivendicare i loro diritti, per promuovere l’uguaglianza di genere e la loro emancipazione. In Armenia la donna fu celebrata, per la prima volta, il 28 febbraio 1909 e poi l'8 marzo. Con il crollo dell'Unione Sovietica, accanto a questa celebrazione, si è aggiunta anche quella di conno- tazione religiosa del 7 aprile, dedicata alla maternità e alla bellezza. È per questo che, in Armenia, la donna viene commemorata per un mese, dall'8 marzo al 7 aprile. E la Terra di Hayk è uno dei pochi Paesi che in calendario, come festività di Stato, ha la data della Festa della Donna. Nel 1991, dopo la dichiarazione di indipendenza della Repubblica d’Armenia, l'8 marzo era stato rimosso dal calendario come ricorrenza e l'8 aprile, invece del 7, era stata proclamata la Giornata della maternità e della bellezza. -
War Crimes and International
PHOTOLURE/ Hayk Baghdasaryan The publication became possible thanks to the support of World Federalist Movement/Institute for Global Policy. The opinions expressed in our published works are those of the author(s) and do not reflect the opinions of World Federalist Movement/Institute for Global Policy. YEREVAN, 2021 Introduction The first day of the ceasefire agreement, November 10, 2020, stopped the 44-day aggression of Turkey-Azerbaijan alliance against the unrecognized, small Republic of Nagorno Karabakh. A young woman journalist from Nagorno Karabakh wrote on her Facebook page: “I went to kiss the walls of my Amaras1 monastery, as I know I will never see it again.” That first day of peace, many people drove to visit the Dadivank2 monastery for the last time, to bid farewell to the spiritual treasure that was an inseparable part of their historic, centuries-old identity as Armenians of Nagorno Karabakh. People were confident that in only a few days, they would no longer be able to visit any of their national treasures so dear to their hearts—treasures of intellectual history that they grew up with. The videos broadcast and shared by Azeri soldiers over the internet showed them standing on the Green Church3, taking off the cross, and destroying the bell tower. It left the local Armenian population with very little hope for the preservation of the sites. The newly drawn map had handed over to Azerbaijan the control of these national treasures, dear to their hearts and part of their geographic landscape of historical monuments. As is true for all world nations, the lives of Armenians can’t be separated from their intellectual, cultural heritage. -
“We Will Stay Here Forever”
“We will stay here forever” A sense of belonging in landmine affected territories of Nagorno-Karabakh Pia Ferner “We will stay here forever” A sense of belonging in landmine affected territories of Nagorno-Karabakh January 2016 Pia Ferner Master International Development Studies Disaster Studies (SDC) SDC-80733 Supervisor: Gemma van der Haar Abstract The aim of this thesis is to gain insight into reasons why Karabakh Armenian settlers choose to settle and live in landmine affected areas of Nagorno-Karabakh, in the South Caucasus. War in the region has ceased in 1994 and enabled Karabakh Armenians to live in the contested territories, now characterized by frozen conflict, despite a continued presence of landmines. I applied an ethnographic research approach to explore meaning making processes of local settlers on their living situation and their readings of landmines. The village of Karegah served as main location for in-depth research and qualitative interviews. A theoretical exploration of the framing on landmines provides basis for a discussion of local settlers perception of landmines and how this relates to humanitarian framings. Theoretical notions of identity and belonging are further explored as aspects that turned out to be of particular relevance for Karabakh Armenians in their accounts of reading and coping with landmines in their living environment. It becomes clear that perceptions of risk are not taking place outside of identity narratives. Risks emanating from landmine contamination tend to be seen as low concern, instead highlighting the importance of Armenian settlers local presence, ascribing further meaning to territory. These findings gain significance in the broader context of conflict resolution. -
Nagorno Karabakh Geo-Politics: Interests and Politics of Outsiders
The Nagorno Karabakh Conflict. Causes of the conflict and obstacles to conflict resolution. Item Type Thesis Authors Nikkar-Esfahani, Hamidreza Rights <a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by-nc-nd/3.0/"><img alt="Creative Commons License" style="border-width:0" src="http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by- nc-nd/3.0/88x31.png" /></a><br />The University of Bradford theses are licenced under a <a rel="license" href="http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/">Creative Commons Licence</a>. Download date 27/09/2021 12:21:20 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10454/5650 University of Bradford eThesis This thesis is hosted in Bradford Scholars – The University of Bradford Open Access repository. Visit the repository for full metadata or to contact the repository team © University of Bradford. This work is licenced for reuse under a Creative Commons Licence. The Nagorno Karabakh Conflict Causes of the conflict and obstacles to conflict resolution Hamidreza Nikkar-Esfahani Department of Peace Studies University of Bradford Submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy October 2009 Table of Contents Abstract ......................................................................................................................... vi Acknowledgments: ...................................................................................................... vii Common Abbreviations ............................................................................................. viii Introduction