Waterview Connection: Environmental Impacts of a Deep Drained Trench

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Waterview Connection: Environmental Impacts of a Deep Drained Trench INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR SOIL MECHANICS AND GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING This paper was downloaded from the Online Library of the International Society for Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering (ISSMGE). The library is available here: https://www.issmge.org/publications/online-library This is an open-access database that archives thousands of papers published under the Auspices of the ISSMGE and maintained by the Innovation and Development Committee of ISSMGE. The paper was published in the proceedings of the 12th Australia New Zealand Conference on Geomechanics and was edited by Graham Ramsey. The conference was held in Wellington, New Zealand, 22-25 February 2015. Waterview Connection: Environmental impacts of a deep drained trench S.J. France1 and A.L Williams2 1Beca, Beca House, 21 Pitt Street, P.O. Box 6345, Wellesley Street, Auckland, 1141, New Zealand; PH (64) 9 300-9000; FAX (64) 9 300-9300; email: [email protected] Beca, Beca House, 21 Pitt Street, P.O. Box 6345, Wellesley Street, Auckland, 1141, New Zealand; PH (64) 9 300-9172; FAX (64) 9 300-9300; email: ann.williams@beca./com ABSTRACT The NZ Transport Agency’s Waterview Connection project involves the construction of 4.8 km of motorway to complete Auckland’s Western Ring Route. Half of this new link will be tunnelled; the remaining half is surface highways and approach trenches. The Southern Approach Trench (SAT) is 400 m long with a temporary excavation up to 29 m deep, through basalt lava flows, Quaternary alluvium, residual soils and Tertiary age interbedded sandstones and siltstones. The concept design considered a drained base with a grout curtain through the basalt and cut-off walls through underlying units to control groundwater inflows and limit environmental impacts such as drawdown, stream depletion and consolidation settlement. Through analysis of the hydrogeological setting it was determined that the trench could be fully drained, without a grout curtain, with manageable groundwater inflows and negligible environmental effects. This paper describes how limited inter- connection between the basalt lobe (through which the SAT is excavated) and the main basalt flow and creek was determined, and presents observations of groundwater inflows during and following construction. Structural controls (paleo-valleys and faults), combined with the low storativity of the units, result in drawdown effects up to 230 m from the trench in some areas. Despite more than 2 years of drawdown, there has been negligible consolidation settlement or stream depletion that could be attributed to construction. Keywords: basalt, drawdown, settlement, groundwater inflows 1 INTRODUCTION The Waterview Connection project involves the construction of 4.8 km of 6-lane motorway through and beneath Auckland’s western suburbs, linking two existing state highways to complete a motorway ring route around the city. Half of this new link will be in tunnels constructed by a Tunnel Boring Machine (TBM), the 10th largest of its kind and the largest to be used in the Southern Hemisphere. The remaining half comprises surface highways and approach trenches (Figure 1). The Southern Approach Trench (SAT), where the TBM was assembled and launched, is 400 m in length with a temporary excavation up to 29 m deep. Figure 2 shows key features of the trench and its construction. 2 GEOLOGICAL SETTING AND STRUCTURAL FORM OF THE SAT The Waterview Connection project is situated within the Waitemata Basin, a shallow marine basin formed between 24 and 18 million years ago (Kermode, 1992). Consolidated sediments that infilled the basin formed a sequence of weak sandstones and siltstones (East Coast Bays Formation, ECBF), locally interbedded with and cross-cut by coarse volcaniclastic sandstone (Parnell Grit member). ECBF underlies the entire project area and outcrops in ridges to the south and west of the alignment. The ECBF is overlain by a variable thickness of Tauranga Group alluvium (~2 million to 10,000 years old) which has infilled a series of paleo-valleys incised in the ECBF. The alluvium is overlain by a ponded basalt lava flow from the Mount Albert volcano (30,000 to 100,000 years old) that flowed into the Oakley Creek paleo-valley. Oakley Creek then re-established itself and now delineates the western boundary of the lava flow. The SAT is constructed through one of the lateral lobes of the basalt lava flow (Figure 2). The excavated basalt face (maximum height of 12 m) is fully drained with face support provided by rockbolts, mesh and a shotcrete facing. Horizontal bored drains are used to control groundwater at the excavation face and a subsoil drain was constructed within the Alluvium at the toe of the basalt. Below the basalt, the trench is retained by bored soldier pile walls with strip drains behind sprayed concrete arches formed between the piles. Herring-bone sub-soil drains beneath the roadway permanently drain the base slab. Oakley Creek was required to be diverted in four places in order to accommodate the trench and surface highway. Figure 1. Location plan Figure 2. Key features of the SAT: A) Southern portal headwall. B) Shotcreted basalt face. C) Bored pile wall retaining soils and ECBF. D) TBM assembly. E) Original alignment of Oakley Creek. F) Diverted alignment of Oakley Creek. G) Edge of basalt lava flow. H) Basalt paleo-valley. 3 HYDROGEOLOGIAL SETTING 3.1 ECBF Water levels within the ECBF are indicative of a regional water table of low gradient, discharging to the northwest (towards the harbour) and locally discharging to Oakley Creek (Figure 3). Groundwater flow is largely defect controlled through fractures and bedding planes, although some lesser flow can also be expected through the matrix of coarser sandstone beds. Rainfall recharge occurs slowly via a series of cascading water levels; however, the main recharge for this unit is from up-gradient flow within the rock mass. The ECBF has a relatively low hydraulic conductivity and storativity. Figure 3. Conceptual Hydrogeological Model. 3.2 Alluvium Water levels in the alluvium are representative of an unconfined to semi-confined aquifer system with water levels typically 2 m higher than levels in the underlying rock. Groundwater flow is predominantly through pore spaces, and the units exhibit a strong vertical anisotropy due to bedding. The anisotropy results in a variable and muted connection with the underlying ECBF. Although some seasonal variation occurs there is only a muted rainfall response observed around the SAT. The alluvium is of low hydraulic conductivity and low storativity, but is compressible and susceptible to consolidation settlement if drained. 3.3 Basalt Water levels within the basalt lava flow are indicative of a perched, unconfined aquifer system, and are 2 m to 7 m greater than those in the underlying units. The water levels respond rapidly to rainfall suggesting a direct connection with the surface. Groundwater flow in the basalt is defect and cavity -6 controlled, with hydraulic conductivity varying over several orders of magnitude (Kh and Kv = 10 m/s to 10-4 m/s) depending on the extent and inter-connection of fractures. Investigation drilling near the centre of the main lava flow (i.e. offline from the SAT) often encountered significant groundwater inflows that were difficult to control; however, anecdotal evidence from excavations at the margin of the flow indicates negligible groundwater inflows. For this reason the groundwater flow connection between the main part of the flows and the marginal lobes was investigated. Contoured groundwater levels in the basalt indicate a predominantly north north-westerly flow direction, analogous to the main direction of the basalt flow, in which significant water bearing defects might reasonably be expected. There is a much less distinct gradient of groundwater flow from the centre of the basalt to the lateral lobes. Where basalt is exposed in the banks above the creek, negligible seepage is observed, suggesting the majority of discharge from the basalt occurs to the north where the basalt thins and shallows resulting in surface springs. This lack of connection to the main water-bearing flow was confirmed by short term pumping tests in the basalt which indicated that although the basalt lobe was of high permeability (i.e. 1 x 10-5 m/s or greater) it was of low storativity, with limited connection to the main basalt lava flow or the creek. As such even small rates of discharge (< 0.5 l/s) could not be maintained during testing for more than a few hours. Simultaneous flow gauging at 7 sites in Oakley Creek allowed a semi-quantitative assessment of the connection between groundwater and surface water. The monitoring indicated that up-gradient of the SAT where the creek is incised into basalt it loses water to ground. Directly adjacent to the SAT, Oakley Creek is incised into the ECBF and the base of basalt is a few metres above creek water level. In this area the water level in the creek is comparable to that in the ECBF. Given the difference in water levels, lack of direct connection between the basalt and creek and lack of observed seepage out of the basalt, the small gain (< 5 l/s equivalent to less than 10 % of in-stream flow from the up-gradient catchment) of water recorded is considered to be largely from the ECBF. 4 GROUNDWATER INFLOWS TO THE DRAINED SAT 4.1 Expected Inflows The volume of groundwater that flows from the basalt was a key consideration during design and construction. The reference design included for a 600 m long grout curtain, surrounding the entire SAT, in order to reduce the anticipated large flows from the basalt and creek. Given the uncertainty around the number of grout holes that would be required, grout take, effectiveness and cost, and having considered the conceptual model described above, omission of the grout curtain was identified as a detailed design opportunity to reduce cost and accelerate the construction programme.
Recommended publications
  • The Waterview Connection Motorway
    Waterview Connection Information Sheet THE WATERVIEW CONNECTION MOTORWAY WHEN WILL THE WATERVIEW WHAT ARE THE TRAFFIC WHAT IS THE CONNECTION OPEN TO BENEFITS OF THE WATERVIEW TRAFFIC? WATERVIEW CONNECTION? Construction is on schedule for opening in early By bridging the gap between the Southwestern CONNECTION? 2017 as planned. and Northwestern motorways, the Waterview Connection will complete Auckland’s Western Being built is 5km of 6-lane motorway Ring Route. This is a 48km motorway link from to connect State Highways 20 (the Manukau in the south to Albany in the north that Southwestern Motorway) and 16 (the WHO WILL OPERATE will bypass central Auckland. Northwestern Motorway). THE MOTORWAY? Completing the Western Ring Route has been There will be three lanes southbound and prioritised as a Road of National Significance three lanes northbound between Maioro The Well-Connected Alliance, which is building because of the contribution it will make to New Street, where S.H.20 now ends, and the the Waterview Connection, will form an alliance Zealand’s future prosperity. It will provide Auckland Great North Road interchange on S.H.16. with international tunnel controls specialists SICE NZ Ltd (Sociedad Ibérica de Construcciones with a resilient and reliable motorway network by Half of the new motorway is underground in Eléctricas) to operate and maintain the motorway reducing the region’s dependence on the single twin tunnels 2.4km long and up to 30m below for the first 10 years of its life. A team from SICE spine comprising State Highway 1 and the Auckland the surface between the Alan Wood Reserve has worked with the Well-Connected Alliance Harbour Bridge for business to business trips, in Owairaka and Waterview.
    [Show full text]
  • St Lukes Interchange (St Lukes Interchange) to Be Shown As Road Purposes for the Project (St Lukes Interchange)
    6 Henderson Valley Road, Henderson, Auckland 0612 Private Bag 92250, Auckland 1142, New Zealand Ph 09 355 3553 Fax 09 355 3550 Notice of Requirement NOTICE OF REQUIREMENT FOR A DESIGNATION UNDER SECTION 168(2) OF THE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ACT 1991 (RMA) TO: Auckland Council FROM: Auckland Transport 6 Henderson Valley Road Henderson Private Bag 92250 Auckland AUCKLAND TRANSPORT (an Auckland Council Controlled Organisation) as Requiring Authority under section 167 of the Resource Management Act 1991 gives notice of a requirement for a designation in the Auckland Council District Plan for works being the Waterview Connection SH16 St Lukes Interchange (St Lukes Interchange) to be shown as road purposes for the Project (St Lukes Interchange). 1. SUMMARY The St Lukes Interchange will generally comprise: Auckland Transport gives notice of a requirement for an alteration to “Designations D05- 08 and B08-04” in the Auckland Council District Plan (Isthmus Section) 2011 (“District Plan”) to widen St Lukes Road and Great North Road at the St Lukes Interchange. The purpose of Designation D05-08 is for regional road and the purpose of designation B08-04 is for public road network. The designations are identified on District Plan Maps D05 and D06 and in Appendix B of the Planning Maps, copies of which are contained in Appendix A this NoR. Under Section 176A(2)(b) of the RMA it is not intended to submit an Outline Plan of Works prior to construction as the details of the proposed works, as referred to in Section 176A(3), are addressed in this NOR. The proposed works are in keeping with the purpose of designations D05-08 and B08-04.
    [Show full text]
  • Waterview Tunnel Project
    CASE STUDY GOING UNDERGROUND: THE Waterview Tunnel Project CLIENT: Well-Connected Alliance LOCATION: Waterview, West/Central Auckland SPECIALIST COATING TEAM: Topcoat Specialist Coatings Ltd PRODUCTS: Ceramicoat, UK Sikagard Wallcoat T, Sika (NZ) Ltd Emerstop crème, Concrete Plus TOTAL AREAS COMPLETED: Sika wall Gard T - Ceiling/Sikafoor 2540W floors 95,600m² Ceramicoat - walls 44,500m² Emer crème - Motorway T beam columns 7,000m² Topcoat Specialist Coatings Ltd played a key role in the successful coating – in a brighter shade – demarcates the side-walls and completion of one of New Zealand’s largest infrastructure guides the way for drivers. For additional safety, a total of 18 projects – the NZ Transport Agency’s Waterview Connection in cross-passages linking the south and north-bound tunnels Auckland. A specially-commissioned Topcoat team worked on the needed to be coated in safety green. large-scale and complex project for more than two years. It was Exacting requirements a collaborative effort; and along with the other key contractors Following a rigorous tender process, Topcoat was chosen as and suppliers, they were proud to celebrate the tunnel’s opening the preferred specialist coating applicator. in mid-2017. Topcoat already had a successful track record in tunnel About the Waterview Connection projects; having previously worked on the Johnstones Hill Designed to help ease Auckland’s growing traffic congestion, the tunnels in Puhoi, and Wellington’s Arras tunnel. Waterview Connection comprises two 3-lane motorway tunnels, both 2.4km long. Coupled with the Great North Road Interchange, it completes the Western Ring Route – which is one of the NZ Government’s roads of national significance (RoNS).
    [Show full text]
  • Auckland Transport Alignment Project April 2018
    Auckland Transport Alignment Project April 2018 Foreword I welcome the advice provided by the Auckland Transport Alignment Project (ATAP). The ATAP package is a transformative transport programme. Investment in transport shapes our city’s development and is a key contributor to economic, social and environmental goals. The direction signalled in this update is shared by Government and Auckland Council and demonstrates our commitment to working together for a better Auckland. Auckland is facing unprecedented population growth, and over the next 30 years a million more people will call Auckland home. Growth brings opportunities but when combined with historic under- investment in infrastructure the strain on the Auckland transport system is unrelenting. Existing congestion on our roads costs New Zealand’s economy $1.3b annually. We need to do things differently to what has been done in the past. Auckland needs a transport system that provides genuine choice for people, enables access to opportunities, achieves safety, health and environmental outcomes and underpins economic development. Our aspiration must be to make sure Auckland is a world class city. Auckland’s success is important not just for Aucklanders, but for our country’s long-term growth and productivity. The Government and Auckland Council have agreed to a transformative and visionary plan. ATAP is a game-changer for Auckland commuters and the first-step in easing congestion and allowing Auckland to move freely. I believe this ATAP package marks a significant step in building a modern transport system in Auckland. ATAP accelerates delivery of Auckland’s rapid transit network, with the aim of unlocking urban development opportunities, encourages walking and cycling, and invests in public transport, commuter and freight rail and funds road improvements.
    [Show full text]
  • Template for Treasury Report
    IN-CONFIDENCE SH-8-6-2-4 Treasury / MoT Report: Business Case for the Waterview Connection Executive Summary This paper outlines the business case for the Waterview Connection as a tunnel and seeks guidance from Ministers as to next steps. Background The Waterview Connection is a proposed extension of State Highway 20 from Mt Roskill to intersect with State Highway 16 at Waterview. The current proposal for the Waterview Connection project is to construct it within twin two-lane tunnels (northbound traffic in one tunnel, southbound in the other), with interchanges at either end. Construction of the Waterview Connection completes the Western Ring Route, a strategic route that links the cities of Manukau, Auckland, Waitakere and North Shore while avoiding SH1 and the Auckland Harbour Bridge. Cost The Waterview Connection is estimated to cost $2.77 billion in 2015 dollars, including the costs of financing the project across the construction period. This is an increase from the published estimate of $1.89 billion in 2015 dollars. The increase in cost has been driven by increases in scope, input cost increases and the inclusion of the costs of financing the project. Scope With the additional traffic volumes that the Waterview Connection brings to the SH16 North- western motorway corridor, it is not possible to integrate the Western Ring Route into the corridor without some form of improvement to SH16. The base Waterview Connection project scope proposes additional lanes in each direction both east and west of the interchange at Waterview. Two alternative scope options have been considered that could vary this scheme.
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the Waterview Connection Procurement Steering Group Progressing the Waterview Connection As a Public Private Partnership
    Report of the Waterview Connection Procurement Steering Group Progressing the Waterview Connection as a public private partnership An investigation of the value of a public private partnership 26 June 2008 To: The Hon Dr Michael Cullen, Minister of Finance, and the Hon Annette King, Minister of Transport. The Waterview Connection Procurement Steering Group is pleased to present our Report into progressing the Waterview Connection as a public private partnership as requested in the Terms of Reference released on 7 February 2008. Dated: 26 June 2008 Sir Brian Elwood Independent Chair Elizabeth Anderson Michael Barnett Ministry of Transport Auckland Chamber of Commerce Mike James Stephen Selwood Deputy Secretary, The Treasury New Zealand Council for Infrastructure Development Phil O’Reilly Business New Zealand Progressing the Waterview Connection as a public private partnership 1 Contents Foreword ..................................................................................................................................................................2 1. Executive summary ..........................................................................................................................................5 2. Introduction ......................................................................................................................................................8 Steering Group membership ................................................................................................................................8 The
    [Show full text]
  • The Waterview Connection Legacy
    JUNE 2017 THE WATERVIEW CONNECTION LEGACY Te Whitinga – the crossing PUBLIC OPENING EVENTS A ceremonial opening on Sunday 18 June will be followed by public open days to allow people the chance to experience the tunnel up close before opening to traffic. 60,500 tickets have been snapped up for the public open days which will take place over the next two weeks. The Well-Connected Alliance has Waterview Reserve Playground Howlett Reserve Walkway been working through schools directly affected by the project to ensure as many children as possible get a chance to walk The Waterview Connection is set to open in early July 2017 into the tunnel. “Interest in the project is so high The $1.4 billion dollar NZ Transport Agency project, New Zealand’s largest and most right across the city that I doubt even ambitious project ever, will soon open for vehicles heralding the biggest catalyst for change 200,000 tickets would be enough meet in Auckland since the Harbour Bridge was built in 1959. the demand,” says Alliance Project Manager Iain Simmons. “We’re extremely proud to deliver this world- “It’s my belief that our collaborative effort with “With demand so high, we’ve had class project to Auckland which will progress the local residents and other key stakeholders has to find the best way to use the few way that people move in and around this city,” been crucial to achieving outstanding results for tickets we have most effectively. We says Iain Simmons, Alliance Project Manager. local communities. It’s an approach that all other thought using local schools would infrastructure projects should commit to and “This is a landmark moment for this truly give us the furthest reach into our actively pursue,” he says.
    [Show full text]
  • Submission of the Campaign for Better Transport on Waterview Connection Project
    Environmental Protection Authority Waterview Connection project PO Box 10720 The Terrace Wellington 6143 Submission of the Campaign for Better Transport on Waterview Connection Project 1. Introduction: The Campaign for Better Transport (CBT) is a non-politically aligned group that advocates for sustainable transport policies and projects throughout Auckland and the rest of New Zealand. The CBT regularly advocates for better alignment between land- use planning and its effects on the transport network, better public transport and better walking and cycling facilities. 2. Summary of Submission: The CBT generally opposes the Waterview Connection project. This is for a number of reasons that will be further detailed in this submission. In short: - It is questionable whether the project will achieve the objectives that NZTA have highlighted. - The proposed bus shoulder lanes along State Highway 16 are an inadequate gesture to provide high quality “Quality Transit Network” standard public transport along this route. Suggestions to improve the quality of the lanes are detailed further in the submission. - Further public transport improvements on local arterial roads must form part of this project package, to ensure that the traffic benefits of the project are “locked in” and not lost to induced demand. - Extensions and improvements to the proposed cycle paths are required to ensure the project contributes to multi-modal transport benefits. - The widening of State Highway 16 must be questioned and reassessed, as the documentation accompanying the application states it will not bring any congestion relief benefits – but will cause significant environmental effects. It is also noted that the State Highway 16 works have been “snuck into” this application – which is generally presented as only the Waterview Connection.
    [Show full text]
  • TRANSPORT COMMITTEE.20130807.Minutesattachments
    AUCKLAND ELECTRIFICATON PROJECT UPDATE Nicholas French – Project Director Auckland Electrification – Elements Remaining Signalling System – Automatic Train Protection Traction – Infrastructure & Commissioning Operational Preparedness – Testing & Commissioning – Operations – Maintenance – Safety and Communications Signalling All of Auckland Network Operating on ‘Final State’ new Signalling Train Control operating on new Train Control System (R9000) Automatic Train Protection (()ETCS) Works – Trackside being delivered by KR as part of Signalling Contract – finished Nov 2013 – On-Board Train ETCS Equipment (Invensys provided) being delivered in conjunction with EMU Team. Installed in Spain – commissioned in NZ. – Trackside equipment being used to deliver Interim ATP system. Signalling Benefits New infrastructure proving to be reliable – 50% overall reduc tion in fault s from Feb 2012 Rail 9000 Operational since April 2012 – Au tomati c Rout e Setti ng – Automatic Train Graphing Bi-Directional Operation – Increased operational flexibility – Protection Systems – Lock Out Zones Automatic Train Protection (ETCS) – Delivered with the arrival of the new EMU’s – Interim system operating off ETCS trackside equipment. Traction System and Power Supply Foundations, Masts, overhead wires and power supply 25 kV AC overhead power. Both separate supply points commissioned Foundations 100% complete. 2785 masts out of 3825 installed. 355km out of 550km total – of OLE Wire (Earth, Catenary and Contact) installed. Auckland Electrified Area Traction and Power
    [Show full text]
  • Before a Board of Inquiry Northern Corridor Improvements Project
    Before a Board of Inquiry Northern Corridor Improvements Project Under the Resource Management Act 1991 (‘the Act’) In the matter of a Board of Inquiry appointed under section 149J of the Act to consider notices of requirement for designations and resource consent applications by the New Zealand Transport Agency for the Northern Corridor Improvements Project Statement of evidence of Shannon Bray for the New Zealand Transport Agency (Urban design, landscape and visual) Dated 20 April 2017 KENSINGTON SWAN 18 Viaduct Harbour Avenue Ph +64 9 379 4196 Private Bag 92101 Fax +64 9 309 4276 Auckland 1142 DX CP22001 Solicitor: C M Sheard/N McIndoe [email protected]/[email protected] 1 Table of contents 1 Qualifications and experience 2 2 Involvement with the Project 3 3 Code of conduct 4 4 Scope of evidence 4 5 Executive summary 5 6 Methodology 7 7 Project description 7 8 Landscape context 8 9 Policy context 10 10 Design process (urban design and landscape) 10 11 Urban design assessment 14 12 Landscape effects assessment 22 13 Visual effects assessment 26 14 Response to submissions 47 15 Response to section 149G(3) key issues report 55 16 Conclusions 56 List of Annexures 58 Annexure A: Urban Design and Landscape Framework 59 Annexure B: Colliston Rise Map and Cross Sections 60 Annexure C:Plans, Cross Sections and 3D Digital Model of SH18 61 6270488 2 STATEMENT OF EVIDENCE OF SHANNON BRAY FOR THE NEW ZEALAND TRANSPORT AGENCY 1 Qualifications and experience 1.1 My full name is Shannon Bray. 1.2 I am the director and owner of my own landscape architectural practice, Shannon Bray Ltd, in Hawke’s Bay, and have been in this position since June 2016.
    [Show full text]
  • Before a Board of Inquiry East West Link Project
    BEFORE A BOARD OF INQUIRY EAST WEST LINK PROJECT UNDER the Resource Management Act 1991 (the RMA) AND IN THE MATTER OF Notices of requirement for designation and resource consent applications by the NEW ZEALAND TRANSPORT AGENCY for the East West Link Project STATEMENT OF PRIMARY EVIDENCE OF DARREN WU ON BEHALF OF THE NEW ZEALAND TRANSPORT AGENCY Construction Traffic Impacts Dated: 12 April 2017 Barristers and Solicitors Auckland Solicitor Acting: Pat Mulligan Email: [email protected] Tel 64 9 358 2555 Fax 64 9 358 2055 PO Box 1433 DX CP24024 Auckland 1140 CONTENTS 1. SUMMARY OF EVIDENCE 1 2. INTRODUCTION 3 3. CODE OF CONDUCT 4 4. SCOPE OF EVIDENCE 4 5. OVERVIEW OF THE PROJECT AND MY ROLE 4 6. ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY 5 7. EXISTING ENVIRONMENT 8 8. ASSESSMENT OF EFFECTS AND PROPOSED MITIGATION 10 9. RESPONSE TO SUBMISSIONS 19 10. CONCLUSION 30 BF\56808835\9 1. SUMMARY OF EVIDENCE 1.1 I have assessed the Construction Traffic Impacts from the Project based on the proposed construction activities as described in Section 7 of the AEE for the Project. I undertook my assessment on the assumption that a Construction Traffic Management Plan (CTMP) and Site Specific Traffic Management Plans (SSTMPs) would be produced. Overall I consider that the effects can be effectively managed to ensure safety and minimise disruption through the implementation of the management plans. 1.2 All temporary traffic management is governed by the Code of Practice for Temporary Traffic Management (CoPTTM) and any proposed work must have an approved SSTMP from the relevant Road Controlling Authority.
    [Show full text]
  • A Tale of Two Tunnels That Is Setting New Best-Practice Standards
    FOCUS >> The Waterview Connection A tale of two tunnels that is setting new best-practice standards New Zealand’s biggest road project underwent extremely rigorous economic and risk assessment procedures before the final contracts were signed, Jenny Pretorius reports he NZ$1.4 billion Waterview Connection project currently Tbeing built by the Well- Connected Alliance provided a series of unique uncertainties, risks and challenges for the project’s owner, the NZ Transport Agency. The usual construction and peripheral pressures associated with large-scale construction work such as building a major inner-city road were compounded by a variety of other factors not often seen in local projects. These included the project’s complex underground tunnel con- struction component, the length of the tunnels that required specialised fire and life-safety features and the fact that construction was taking place in a built-up urban area with major traffic issues and a sensitive cultural, physical, and social environment. The competitive alliance Artist’s impression of appearance of junction on south end procurement method offered the best option to minimise the risks, achieve Images courtesy of NZ Transport Agency, Well-Connected Alliance complete certainty with respect to outcomes and optimise value for money, according to one of the decision making is key to ensuring “The commercial model and Sharing risks and rewards key experts involved in the tender the selection of an appropriate alliance principles inherent in The cost of transferring risk is
    [Show full text]