DOCSLIB.ORG

Northern Corridor Improvements

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Northern Corridor Improvements Urban DesignDraft Urban and DesignLandscape Landscape Framework Framework (UDLF) ProjectProject No: No: 250310 250310 Document Ref: Document:NCI-3PRE-1PLA-RPT-0104 NCI-3PRE-1PLA-RPT-0104 Revision:Revision: 1 3 12 December 2016 Date: 1 August 2017 This report has been prepared for the benefit of the NZ Transport Agency. No liability is accepted by this company Document control record or any employee or sub-consultant of this company with respect to its use by any other person. This disclaimer shall apply notwithstanding that the report may be made available to other persons for an Document prepared by: application for permission or approval or to fulfil a legal requirement. Aurecon New Zealand Limited Level 4, 139 Carlton Gore Road Quality Assurance Statement Newmarket Auckland 1023 PO Box 9762 Prepared by: Jose Rodriguez (Boffa Miskell) Newmarket Auckland 1149 New Zealand Reviewed by: Chris Bentley (Boffa Miskell) NZTA Reviewer: Sam Bourne Approved for issue by Aurecon: Jon Hind T +64 9 520 6019 Approved for use by NZTA: Kenny See F +64 9 524 7815 E [email protected] W aurecongroup.com Document control Report title Urban Design Landscape Framework A person using Aurecon documents or data accepts the risk of: a) Using the documents or data in electronic form without requesting and checking them for accuracy against the original hard copy version. Document ID NCI-3PRE-1PLA-RPT-0104 Project number 250310 b) Using the documents or data for any purpose not agreed to in writing by Aurecon. Client NZ Transport Agency Client contact Kenny See Rev Date Revision details/status Prepared by Author Verifier Approver This report has been prepared for the benefit of the NZ Transport Agency. No liability is accepted by this company or any employee or sub-consultant of this company with respect to its use by any other person. 5 1 December Final for review Jose Rodriguez Chris Bentley John Goodwin Document control record 2016 This disclaimer shall apply notwithstanding that the report may be made available to other persons for an 6 5 December Final for review Jose Rodriguez Chris Bentley John Goodwin Document prepared by: application for permission or approval or to fulfil a legal requirement. 2016 Aurecon New Zealand Limited 7 8 December Final for review Jose Rodriguez Chris Bentley John Goodwin 2016 Level 4, 139 Carlton Gore Road Quality Assurance Statement Newmarket Auckland 1023 8 9 December Final for review Jose Rodriguez Chris Bentley John Goodwin 2016 PO Box 9762 Prepared by: Jose Rodriguez (Boffa Miskell) Newmarket Auckland 1149 Current revision 8 New Zealand Reviewed by: Chris Bentley (Boffa Miskell) Shannon Bray (Wayfinder) NZTA Reviewer: Sam Bourne Approved for issue by Aurecon: Jon Hind T +64 9 520 6019 Approved for use by NZTA: Kenny See F +64 9 524 7815 E [email protected] W aurecongroup.com Document control Page II | Northern Corridor Improvements Project | Urban Design and Landscape Framework Report title Urban Design Landscape Framework A person using Aurecon documents or data accepts the risk of: a) Using the documents or data in electronic form without requesting and checking them for accuracy against the original hard copy version. Document ID NCI-3PRE-1PLA-RPT-0104 Project number 250310 b) Using the documents or data for any purpose not agreed to in writing by Aurecon. Client NZ Transport Agency Client contact Kenny See Rev Date Revision details/status Prepared by Author Verifier Approver 5 1 December Final for review Jose Rodriguez Chris Bentley John Goodwin 2016 6 5 December Final for review Jose Rodriguez Chris Bentley John Goodwin 2016 7 8 December Final for review Jose Rodriguez Chris Bentley John Goodwin 2016 Document No. NCI-3PRE-1PLA-RPT-0104 8 9 December Final for review Jose Rodriguez Chris Bentley John Goodwin 2016 Project No. 250310 | Page I Current revision 8 Document No. NCI-3PRE-1PLA-RPT-0104 Project No. 250310 | Page I Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................1 5 OUTCOMES SOUGHT ...................................................................................................................30 5.1. General Urban Design Outcomes Sought ..............................................................................30 5.2. General Landscape Design Outcomes Sought ......................................................................31 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ................................................................................................................4 5.3. Matauranga Maori Outcomes ...............................................................................................32 2.1. Project objectives ....................................................................................................................4 5.4. Bridge Outcomes Sought ......................................................................................................33 2.2. Project benefits .......................................................................................................................4 5.5. Stormwater Management Outcomes Soughts .......................................................................36 2.3. Purpose and scope of the UDLF ..............................................................................................5 5.6. Underpasses Outcomes Sought ............................................................................................36 2.4. Design methodology ..............................................................................................................6 5.7. Noise and Retaining Walls Outcomes Sought ........................................................................37 2.5. Structure of this document .....................................................................................................6 5.8. Busway Outcomes Sought ....................................................................................................39 2.6. References ..............................................................................................................................6 5.9. Planting anticipated outcomes ..............................................................................................39 5.10. SUP accessory infrastructure requirements ............................................................................40 3 PROJECT CONTEXT .....................................................................................................................8 5.11. Other anticipated outcomes .................................................................................................40 3.1. History and heritage ...............................................................................................................8 3.2. Environmental context ............................................................................................................9 3.3. Neighbourhoods and community .........................................................................................14 6 LANDSCAPE MITIGATION AND ENHANCEMENT PLANS .........................................................42 3.4. Land use, built form and infrastructure relationships .............................................................15 3.5. Connections and access .......................................................................................................17 3.6. Ecology ..............................................................................................................................19 3.7. Hydrology and stormwater .................................................................................................20 3.8. Project constraints and opportunities ....................................................................................20 4 DESIGN STRATEGY ......................................................................................................................24 4.1. Vision ...................................................................................................................................24 4.2. Design Principles ...................................................................................................................24 4.3. Strategic and policy context .................................................................................................27 4.4. Walking and Cycling .............................................................................................................28 4.5. Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design ..................................................................28 He hōnore, he korōria ki te Atua He maungārongo ki te whenua He whakaaro pai ki ngā tāngata katoa Northern Corridor Improvements Project | Urban Design and Landscape Framework | Page III Project Area in 1963 Project Area today Page IV | Northern Corridor Improvements Project | Urban Design and Landscape Framework 1. INTRODUCTION 1. INTRODUCTION 16 State Highway Metropolitan Centre 1.1 The Project Rail Line The Northern Corridor Improvements Project (the Project) will create a new direct motorway-to- Western Ring Route Corridor motorway link on the North Shore, by connecting SH1 with SH18. Achieving this will complete the northern end of the ‘Western Ring Route’ (WRR), a wider Auckland motorway project that has Northern Corridor Upgrade involved the construction of the Waterview Connection and the significant widening and upgrading of the Northwestern
Recommended publications

  • Your Bus Service Is Changing

    120 Constellation Bus Station Constellation Bus Station Henderson Henderson Sunset Rd Sunset Rd Ratanui St Ratanui St Meadowood Dr Meadowood Dr Unitec Waitakere Unitec Waitakere Sunset Rd Sunset Rd Swanson Rd Swanson Rd Tableau Place walkway Tableau Place walkway Mt Lebanon Lane Mt Lebanon Lane Sunset Rd Sunset Rd Swanson Rd Swanson Rd North Shore Trias Rd Trias Rd Sturges Rd Station Sturges Rd Station Jo Sunset Rd Sunset Rd Swanson Rd Swanson Rd Golf Course hn Gl Target Rd Target Rd 114 Swanson Rd 114 Swanson Rd enn Av Elm e Sunset Rd Sunset Rd Swanson Rd Swanson Rd o ple Girrahween Dr Girrahween Dr Waitakere College Waitakere College r p by ei rmark Dr e R A Rd P Albany Highway Albany Highway Swanson Rd Swanson Rd d A n Dr Westminster Christian School Westminster Christian School Mihini Rd Mihini Rd io l Rosedale t Albany ba E a Upper Harbour Dr Upper Harbour Dr Swanson Rd Swanson Rd ell L Dene Court Lane Dene Court Lane Universal Drive roundabout Universal Drive roundabout n Junior High Park st av g Rosedale South n Upper Harbour Dr Upper Harbour Dr Don Buck Rd Don Buck Rd ny o e li C J ry Kereru Grove Kereru Grove Sabot Place Sabot Place s l Park d u P Greenhithe Rd Greenhithe Rd RiverheadDon Buck Forest Rd Don Buck Rd h R nipe 175 Greenhithe Rd 175 Greenhithe Rd Helena St Helena St H e ws Rd t r tthe e R L Oak v ul Ma s Greenhithe Rd Greenhithe Rd Don Buck Rd Don Buck Rd au ig A Pa n d S rel Oak Dr S l u Upper Harbour Motorway Upper Harbour Motorway Zita Maria Drive Zita Maria Drive Dr c h l Constellation S c A a h r Greenhithe Rd
  • The Waterview Connection Motorway

    The Waterview Connection Motorway

    Waterview Connection Information Sheet THE WATERVIEW CONNECTION MOTORWAY WHEN WILL THE WATERVIEW WHAT ARE THE TRAFFIC WHAT IS THE CONNECTION OPEN TO BENEFITS OF THE WATERVIEW TRAFFIC? WATERVIEW CONNECTION? Construction is on schedule for opening in early By bridging the gap between the Southwestern CONNECTION? 2017 as planned. and Northwestern motorways, the Waterview Connection will complete Auckland’s Western Being built is 5km of 6-lane motorway Ring Route. This is a 48km motorway link from to connect State Highways 20 (the Manukau in the south to Albany in the north that Southwestern Motorway) and 16 (the WHO WILL OPERATE will bypass central Auckland. Northwestern Motorway). THE MOTORWAY? Completing the Western Ring Route has been There will be three lanes southbound and prioritised as a Road of National Significance three lanes northbound between Maioro The Well-Connected Alliance, which is building because of the contribution it will make to New Street, where S.H.20 now ends, and the the Waterview Connection, will form an alliance Zealand’s future prosperity. It will provide Auckland Great North Road interchange on S.H.16. with international tunnel controls specialists SICE NZ Ltd (Sociedad Ibérica de Construcciones with a resilient and reliable motorway network by Half of the new motorway is underground in Eléctricas) to operate and maintain the motorway reducing the region’s dependence on the single twin tunnels 2.4km long and up to 30m below for the first 10 years of its life. A team from SICE spine comprising State Highway 1 and the Auckland the surface between the Alan Wood Reserve has worked with the Well-Connected Alliance Harbour Bridge for business to business trips, in Owairaka and Waterview.
  • St Lukes Interchange (St Lukes Interchange) to Be Shown As Road Purposes for the Project (St Lukes Interchange)

    St Lukes Interchange (St Lukes Interchange) to Be Shown As Road Purposes for the Project (St Lukes Interchange)

    6 Henderson Valley Road, Henderson, Auckland 0612 Private Bag 92250, Auckland 1142, New Zealand Ph 09 355 3553 Fax 09 355 3550 Notice of Requirement NOTICE OF REQUIREMENT FOR A DESIGNATION UNDER SECTION 168(2) OF THE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ACT 1991 (RMA) TO: Auckland Council FROM: Auckland Transport 6 Henderson Valley Road Henderson Private Bag 92250 Auckland AUCKLAND TRANSPORT (an Auckland Council Controlled Organisation) as Requiring Authority under section 167 of the Resource Management Act 1991 gives notice of a requirement for a designation in the Auckland Council District Plan for works being the Waterview Connection SH16 St Lukes Interchange (St Lukes Interchange) to be shown as road purposes for the Project (St Lukes Interchange). 1. SUMMARY The St Lukes Interchange will generally comprise: Auckland Transport gives notice of a requirement for an alteration to “Designations D05- 08 and B08-04” in the Auckland Council District Plan (Isthmus Section) 2011 (“District Plan”) to widen St Lukes Road and Great North Road at the St Lukes Interchange. The purpose of Designation D05-08 is for regional road and the purpose of designation B08-04 is for public road network. The designations are identified on District Plan Maps D05 and D06 and in Appendix B of the Planning Maps, copies of which are contained in Appendix A this NoR. Under Section 176A(2)(b) of the RMA it is not intended to submit an Outline Plan of Works prior to construction as the details of the proposed works, as referred to in Section 176A(3), are addressed in this NOR. The proposed works are in keeping with the purpose of designations D05-08 and B08-04.
  • Video Questions and Answers

    Video Questions and Answers

    Page 1 of 2 Waterview Connection Video Answers Tuesday 26 August 1. Meeting Auckland’s Roading Needs Drive down to the waterfront in the centre of Auckland City and meet Peter Spies from NZTA to find out more about Auckland’s road network. 1. Why are good roads important? They allow people, goods and services to travel easily and efficiently to help the economy 2. What are some of the challenges in providing good roads in Auckland? two harbours, volcanoes and an increasing population 3. What happens if there is an accident on the Harbour Bridge? There are very long delays as it shuts the main route through Auckland. Next step learning: Find out more about the State Highways in your local area and how they have changed over time. 2. The Western Ring – An Alternative Route Find out more about the Auckland Harbour Bridge and discover why Auckland needs the Western Ring Route. 1. How long was it expected to take to complete the Western Ring Route? 15 years 2. What were some of the major projects involved in closing up the gaps in the Western Ring Route? Manukau Extension, the Mount Roskill Project, Manukau Harbour Crossing, Hobsinville Extension 3. Why is the Harbour Bridge not enough to meet transport needs? It cannot be extended, the clip-ons have a limited life and will need replacing Next step learning: Discuss how you think the Western Ring Route will impact on Auckland and how it might affect you. LEARNZ Waterview Connection Field Trip to Auckland – Term 3, 2014 Log in to http://www.learnz.org.nz/waterviewconnection143 Page 2 of 2 3.
  • South & East Auckland Auckland Airport

    South & East Auckland Auckland Airport

    G A p R D D Paremoremo O N R Sunnynook Course EM Y P R 18 U ParemoremoA O H N R D E M Schnapper Rock W S Y W R D O L R SUNSET RD E R L ABERDEEN T I A Castor Bay H H TARGE SUNNYNOOK S Unsworth T T T S Forrest C Heights E O South & East Auckland R G Hill R L Totara Vale R D E A D R 1 R N AIRA O S Matapihi Point F W F U I T Motutapu E U R RD Stony Batter D L Milford Waitemata THE R B O D Island Thompsons Point Historic HI D EN AR KITCHENER RD Waihihi Harbour RE H Hakaimango Point Reserve G Greenhithe R R TRISTRAM Bayview D Kauri Point TAUHINU E Wairau P Korakorahi Point P DIANA DR Valley U IPATIKI CHIVALRY RD HILLSIDERD 1 A R CHARTWELL NZAF Herald K D Lake Takapuna SUNNYBRAE RD SHAKESPEARE RD ase RNZAF T Pupuke t Island 18 Glenfield AVE Takapuna A Auckland nle H Takapuna OCEAN VIEW RD kland a I Golf Course A hi R Beach Golf Course ro O ia PT T a E O Holiday Palm Beach L R HURSTMERE RD W IL D Park D V BEACH HAVEN RD NORTHCOTE R N Beach ARCHERS RD Rangitoto B S P I O B E K A S D A O Island Haven I RD R B R A I R K O L N U R CORONATION RD O E Blackpool H E Hillcrest R D A A K R T N Church Bay Y O B A SM K N D E N R S Birkdale I R G Surfdale MAN O’WAR BAY RD Hobsonville G A D R North Shore A D L K A D E Rangitawhiri Point D E Holiday Park LAK T R R N OCEANRALEIGH VIEW RD I R H E A R E PUPUKE Northcote Hauraki A 18 Y D EXMOUTH RD 2 E Scott Pt D RD L R JUTLAND RD E D A E ORAPIU RD RD S Birkenhead V I W K D E A Belmont W R A L R Hauraki Gulf I MOKO ONEWA R P IA RD D D Waitemata A HINEMOA ST Waiheke LLE RK Taniwhanui Point W PA West Harbour OLD LAKE Golf Course Pakatoa Point L E ST Chatswood BAYSWATER VAUXHALL RD U 1 Harbour QUEEN ST Bayswater RD Narrow C D Motuihe KE NS R Luckens Point Waitemata Neck Island AWAROA RD Chelsea Bay Golf Course Park Point Omiha Motorway .
  • Auckland's Strategic Public Transport Network – Lessons Learned from The

    Auckland's Strategic Public Transport Network – Lessons Learned from The

    Auckland’s Strategic PT Network D Newcombe Page 0 AUCKLAND’S STRATEGIC PUBLIC TRANSPORT NETWORK – LESSONS LEARNED FROM THE BUSINESS CASE APPROACH Author/Presenter: Daniel Newcombe, MEngSt (Transportation), BPlan, MNZPI City Centre & RTN Initiatives team manager, Auckland Transport [email protected] 15th December 2016 ABSTRACT Auckland Transport (AT) is investigating how best to plan and deliver future improvements to the Strategic Public Transport Network (SPTN) to cater for Auckland’s rapidly growing population. The way this work is being undertaken is influenced by NZTA’s new Business Case Approach required for all future transport investments. This paper will outline AT’s work to date on the SPTN and how AT is using the recent Auckland Transport Alignment Project (ATAP) to strategically direct this work. The paper will also cover what AT has learned from applying the various processes contained within the Business Case Approach, how this has shaped the future programme and any wider lessons that could be applied to other transport projects. IPENZ Transportation Group Conference, Hamilton, 29 – 31 March 2017 Auckland’s Strategic PT Network D Newcombe Page 1 INTRODUCTION Auckland Transport (AT) is the road controlling authority responsible for the planning, operation and maintenance of most components of the Auckland transport system, including the public transport network (buses, trains, and ferries). The core of the public transport system is the Strategic Public Transport Network (SPTN) which consists of the heavy rail network and Northern Busway. To receive transport investment from the New Zealand Transport Agency (NZTA) for developing the SPTN and all other transport infrastructure or services, AT is required undertake a range of business cases defined under the Business Case Approach (BCA).
  • Kaipatiki Local Board.20110510.Minutesattachments

    Kaipatiki Local Board.20110510.Minutesattachments

    Item 18 Attachment D Prioritisation table of initiatives. The Kaipatiki Local Board is seeking funding for the initiatives in the following table for its 2011/12 Local Board Agreement (note: this is not a ranked list). Initiative Rationale Costs Enhancement of all local A number of existing local Unknown assets that serve a regional or parks and facilities within sub-regional function such as Kaipatiki provide for sub- netball, football etc and regional and regional provide support for the club activities. To ensure on-going that use the facilities levels of service are maintained and enhanced regional support for the costs of these facilities should be provided at a regional level. Improvements to the North The North Shore Events Unknown Shore Events Centre Centre requires climate including climate control and control for minimum sound proofing standards for the National Basketball League (for the NZ Breakers) and sound proofing to minimise adverse effects on neighbours. Improvements to the venue will provide opportunities to secure other events Urgently undertake the de- Ponds require urgent Onepoto c$70k silting of Onepoto, Link Drive, maintenance for the de- Chelsea Chelsea and Totaravale silting: Others Unknown stormwater ponds - offensive odours; - wildlife is dying and - the silt is causing problems for recreational users. Development of parking on The site purchase for Unknown vacant site of 450 Glenfield additional parking in Road Glenfield. Budget needs to be provided to remove the house and establish the parking. Site is in an unacceptable condition. Northcote Mainstreet Gateway Identified through the Town Unknown project Centre plan as a priority. Land has become available for the gateway and is needed for this centre identified for growth.
  • Notice of Requirement (Designation) Form

    Notice of Requirement (Designation) Form

    Notice of Requirement (Designation) Form For office use only: Private Bag 63002 Application number: .............................. Waterloo Quay Wellington 6140 Date received: ...................................... This form must be accompanied by a completed Nationally Significant Proposals Application Form. All legislative references relate to the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA) unless stated otherwise. You must serve the relevant local authority with notice of this matter together with notice of its lodgement with the EPA. Part I: Notice of Requirement 1 by NZ Transport Agency for Alteration of Designation 6750 Sections 168(1), (2) and 181 and clause 4 of Schedule 1, RMA. This part of the form reflects the information requirements of Form 18 of the Resource Management (Forms, Fees, and Procedure) Regulations 2003. This application intends to gives notice of a requirement for a designation (or alteration to a designation) for a public work (or project or work, or in respect of any land, water, subsoil, or airspace where a restriction is necessary for the safe or efficient functioning or operation of a public work or a project or work). Give details of the nature of the proposed public work (or project or work). Designation 6750 applies to State highway 1 (SH1) from Greville Road in the north to the Auckland Harbour Bridge in the south. The work, the subject of NOR1 extends from the current northern boundary of Designation 6750 to the vicinity of the Sunset Road overbridge, together with adjacent land. The site to which NOR1 applies is identified and legally described in the Notice of Requirement Plans and Notice of Requirement Property Information Table contained within Volume 1.
  • Auckland Transport Quarterly Report

    Auckland Transport Quarterly Report

    Auckland Transport Quarterly Report Quarter ended 30 September 2017 New electronic ticketing gates at Ōtāhuhu station Auckland Transport Quarterly Report – Quarter ended 30 September 2017 Page 1 of 25 Table of Contents 1. Executive summary 3 2. Strategic issues and focus areas 5 3. Highlights for the last quarter 12 4. Future outlook 12 5. Key deliverables 14 6. Financial performance 16 7. Performance measures 17 8. Contribution to Māori outcomes 22 9. Key Local Board Issues 24 10. Risk Management 25 Auckland Transport Quarterly Report – Quarter ended 30 September 2017 Page 2 of 25 1. Executive summary Strategic Context Auckland Transport (AT) has made significant progress in recent years, with major improvements in the public transport system, strong patronage growth, increasing customer satisfaction ratings, commencement of the City Rail Link and investment in active modes of transport, particularly cycling facilities. However, despite this progress, these achievements are quickly becoming neutralised by Auckland’s rapidly increasing population and the emerging impacts of an historical infrastructure deficit. Unprecedented growth in Auckland’s population is driving a significant increase in the demand for travel, putting severe pressure on the transport network and causing sustained levels of high congestion on the arterial network, although this has eased to an extent by the opening of the Waterview Tunnel. In the past quarter, AT has begun preparing the next suite of ten year planning documents (Long Term Plan, Regional Land Transport Plan and the Regional Public Transport Programme). These plans will need innovative and customer focused solutions on a tight budget. At the same time, AT has continued solid delivery of core business.
  • To View an Individual Route Map, Click on the Route Number

    To View an Individual Route Map, Click on the Route Number

    Ngataringa Bayswater PROPOSED SERVICES Bay KEY SYMBOLS FREQUENT SERVICES LOCAL SERVICES PEAK PERIOD SERVICES Little Shoal Station or key connection point Birkenhead Bay Northwestern Northwest to Britomart via Crosstown 6a Crosstown 6 extension to 101 Pt Chevalier to Auckland University services Northwestern Motorway and Selwyn Village via Jervois Rd Northcote Cheltenham Rail Line Great North Rd To viewNorthcote an individualPoint route map, click on the route number (Passenger Service) Titirangi to Britomart via 106 Freemans Bay to Britomart Loop 209 Beach North Shore Northern Express routes New North Rd and Blockhouse Bay Stanley Waitemata service Train Station NX1, NX2 and NX3 138 Henderson to New Lynn via Mangere Town Centre to Ferries to Northcote, Point Harbour City LINK - Wynyard Quarter to Avondale Peninsula Wynyard Quarter via Favona, Auckland Harbour Birkenhead, West Harbour, North City Link 309X Bridge Beach Haven and Karangahape Rd via Queen St 187 Lynfield to New Lynn via Mangere Bridge, Queenstown Rd Ferries to West Harbour, Hobsonville Head Ferry Terminal Beach Haven and Stanley Bay (see City Centre map) Blockhouse Bay and Pah Rd (non stop Hobsonville Services in this Inner LINK - Inner loop via Parnell, Greenwoods Corner to Newmarket) Services to 191 New Lynn to Blockhouse Bay via North Shore - direction only Inner Link Newmarket, Karangahape Rd, Avondale Peninsula and Whitney St Panmure to Wynyard Quarter via Ferry to 701 Lunn Ave and Remuera Rd not part of this Ponsonby and Victoria Park 296 Bayswater Devonport Onehunga
  • Fairfax/NZME – Response to Questions Arising from the Conference

    Fairfax/NZME – Response to Questions Arising from the Conference

    1 PUBLIC VERSION NZME AND FAIRFAX RESPONSE TO COMMERCE COMMISSION QUESTIONS ARISING FROM THE CONFERENCE ON 6 AND 7 DECEMBER 2016 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. During its recent Conference held on 6 and 7 December 2016, the Commissioners asked the parties to follow up on a number of points. This paper sets out the parties' responses on those questions, and also provides answers to some further follow-up questions that the parties have received since the Conference. 2. The main points that this response covers are as follows: (a) Inefficient duplication of commodity news (external plurality): The Commissioners asked the parties to produce examples of "commodity" news coverage as between the five main media organisations being similar ("digger hits bridge" was provided as an example of where all the major media organisations covered effectively the same point). Reducing that duplication will be efficiency enhancing and will not materially detract from the volume or quality of news coverage. (b) A wide variety of perspectives are covered within each publication (internal plurality): The editors provided the Commission with examples of how each publication covers a wide variety of perspectives, as that is what attracts the greatest audience. This is true both within and across each of the parties' publications. The Commission asked for examples, which are provided in this response, together with additional material about why those incentives do not change post-Merger. (c) Constitutional safeguards on editorial independence: The Commissioners asked about what existing structures protected editorial independence and balance and fairness in reporting. This was asked both in the context of a possible future sale of Fairfax's stake, and in the context of the protections available to those subject to negative reporting seeking fairness and balance.

  • Engineering Walk Final with out Cover Re-Print.Indd

    Heritage Walks _ The Engineering Heritage of Auckland 5 The Auckland City Refuse Destructor 1905 Early Electricity Generation 1908 9 Wynyard Wharf 1922 3 13 Auckland Electric 1 Hobson Wharf The New Zealand National Maritime Museum Tramways Co. Ltd Princes Wharf 1937 1989 1899–1902 1921–24 12 7 2 The Viaduct 10 4 11 The Auckland Gasworks, Tepid Baths Lift Bridge The Auckland Harbour Bridge The Sky Tower Viaduct Harbour first supply to Auckland 1865 1914 1932 1955-59 1997 1998-99 Route A 1850 1860 1870 1880 1890 1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 Route B 14 Old 15 Auckland High Court 13 The Old Synagogue 1 10 Albert Park 1942 Government 1865-7 1884-85 The Ferry Building House 1912 1856 16 Parnell Railway Bridge and Viaduct 5 The Dingwall Building 1935 1865-66 3 Chief Post Office 1911 The Britomart Transport Centre 7 The Ligar Canal, named 1852, improved 1860s, covered 1870s 6 8 Civic Theatre 1929 2001-2004 New Zealand 9 Guardian Trust The Auckland Town Hall Building 1911 1914 17 The Auckland Railway Station 1927-37 11 Albert Barracks Wall 2 Queens Wharf 1913 1846-7 4 The Dilworth Building 1926 12 University of Auckland Old Arts Building 1923-26 10 Route A, approx 2.5 hours r St 9 Route B, approx 2.5 hours Hame Brigham St Other features Jellicoe St 1 f r ha W Madden s 2 e St St rf Princ a 12 h 13 W s Beaumont START HERE een 11 Qu Pakenha m St St 1 son ob H St bert y St n St Gaunt St Al 2 e e Pakenh S ue ket Place H1 am Q Hals St 3 ar Customs M St Quay St 3 4 18 NORTH Sw 8 St anson S Fanshawe t 5 7 6 Wyn Shortla dham nd