DOCSLIB.ORG

Notice of Requirement (Designation) Form

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Notice of Requirement (Designation) Form Notice of Requirement (Designation) Form For office use only: Private Bag 63002 Application number: .............................. Waterloo Quay Wellington 6140 Date received: ...................................... This form must be accompanied by a completed Nationally Significant Proposals Application Form. All legislative references relate to the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA) unless stated otherwise. You must serve the relevant local authority with notice of this matter together with notice of its lodgement with the EPA. Part I: Notice of Requirement 1 by NZ Transport Agency for Alteration of Designation 6750 Sections 168(1), (2) and 181 and clause 4 of Schedule 1, RMA. This part of the form reflects the information requirements of Form 18 of the Resource Management (Forms, Fees, and Procedure) Regulations 2003. This application intends to gives notice of a requirement for a designation (or alteration to a designation) for a public work (or project or work, or in respect of any land, water, subsoil, or airspace where a restriction is necessary for the safe or efficient functioning or operation of a public work or a project or work). Give details of the nature of the proposed public work (or project or work). Designation 6750 applies to State highway 1 (SH1) from Greville Road in the north to the Auckland Harbour Bridge in the south. The work, the subject of NOR1 extends from the current northern boundary of Designation 6750 to the vicinity of the Sunset Road overbridge, together with adjacent land. The site to which NOR1 applies is identified and legally described in the Notice of Requirement Plans and Notice of Requirement Property Information Table contained within Volume 1. 2 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AUTHORITY The nature of the proposed work is: The work to which NOR1 relates forms part of the Project, described in Section 5 of the AEE. The Project is a key component of the Western Ring Route, which is a Road of National Significance. In summary, the key elements of the Project are as follows: . SH1 & SH18 Motorway Interchange connections; . State highway capacity and safety improvements; . Busway extension from Constellation Bus tation and a connection to Albany Bus Station; . Reconfiguring Constellation Station; and . Shared Use Path (SUP) provision along existing SH1 & SH18 routes for the full extent of the Project: . Constellation Bus Station to Oteha Valley Road. Constellation Drive to Albany Highway. Intermediate linkages to the local network. The nature of the work the subject of this NOR includes the construction, operation and maintenance of the State highway and ancillary works including approaches, ramp connections, ancillary safety and operational services (including communications), vegetation removal, stormwater treatment, temporary construction works including storage areas and office facilities, maintenance and access areas, mitigation and restoration, ancillary structures and activities associated with these works. The full extent of the works are identified at Section 5, Project Description, of the AEE. The nature of the proposed work to be authorised by NOR1 is as follows: . Widening of SH1 northbound between Constellation Drive and Greville Road from 3 to 5 lanes, including along the causeway; . Widening of SH1 southbound between Greville Road and Constellation Drive from 3 to 4 lanes; . Motorway to motorway ramps from SH1 southbound to SH18 westbound and SH18 eastbound to SH1 northbound; . Upper Harbour Highway overbridge additional southbound SH1 lane; . Widening of the Greville Road overbridge; . Widening of the Rosedale Road overbridge; and . Safety barrier upgrades. Give details of the nature of the proposed conditions that will apply (if relevant). The nature of the proposed conditions that would apply are: It is proposed that the Project will be subject to the proposed designation conditions set out at Appendix A of the AEE. Once constructed, access to the formed State highway will be restricted and controlled to provide safe and efficient movement of traffic and for associated activities that may be required. The existing conditions applying to Designation 6750 that relate to previous works associated with bus shoulder improvements are proposed to be removed through the alteration to this designation. 3 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AUTHORITY Give details of the effects that the public work (or project or work) will have on the environment, and the ways any adverse effects will be mitigated. The AEE describes the existing environment (Section 4), the environmental effects of the Project (Section 9, and Volume 3) and proposed methods to avoid, remedy or mitigate adverse effects of the works associated with the Project (Section 10). The actual and potential positive effects of the Project are: . Effects on traffic and transportation during operation of the Project. This includes benefits for private vehicles, public transport, walking and cycling arising from improved travel times, decreases in vehicle numbers on local roads, safety benefits, quicker and more reliable public transport journeys, and additional shared use paths; . Potential benefits to air quality on an airshed scale, resulting from vehicles relocating to more free flowing roads after the Project is complete; . Proposed stormwater management devices treating significantly more stormwater than is currently the case; . Benefits arising from the identification and possible removal of contaminated material and soil; . Accessibility and connectivity benefits for local residents, leading to positive social impacts. The actual and potential adverse effects of the Project are: Temporary adverse effects . Effects on archaeology and historic heritage during construction are expected to be low to nil; . Noise effects during construction which will need to be managed; . Vibration effects during construction which could be significant for some properties, and will need to be managed; . Effects on terrestrial ecology (vegetation, avifauna, lizards, bats) during construction, which are expected to be, at worst, moderate to minor, depending on the specific location; . Effects on air quality arising from discharges of dust during construction, which could create significant amenity and nuisance effects for short periods of time; . Effects on traffic and transportation during construction of the Project. This includes speed limit reductions, lane narrowing, prevention of some transport movements, and additional construction traffic; . Construction water effects due to an increased risk of sediment being discharged to water bodies during construction activities, including works within streams and other water courses; . Effects on freshwater ecology due to increased sedimentation during construction; . Effects on landscape and visual amenity during construction, arising from earthworks and the removal of vegetation. Overall, these are expected to be very low to very high (depending on the location); . Effects associated with disturbance of contaminated land, which will be managed; . Effects associated with working within the closed Rosedale Landfill, including hazards from refuse, gas and leachate. These could be significant without appropriate management; . Social effects during construction, such as annoyance and disruption from noise, vibration, dust, traffic disruption, and business disruption; Permanent adverse effects . Operational noise effects will in most instances be similar to those which would have been experienced without the Project. Nonetheless, noise barriers and building modification are proposed in some locations; . Effects on archaeology and historic heritage during operation are expected to be low to nil; . Vibration effects during operation are expected to be negligible for all receivers; . Increased stormwater arising from additional impervious surfaces. This will be managed using additional stormwater structures, but may lead to increases in peak flood levels in some locations (with reduced peak flood levels in other locations); . Effects on freshwater ecology due to increased stormwater runoff and additional culverting. These effects are expected to be less than minor; . Effects on landscape and visual amenity arising from the loss of open space and vegetation, which are expected to be moderate to low, (depending on the location); 4 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AUTHORITY . Negligible effects arising from the completion of works within Rosedale Landfill possibly impacting on groundwater recharge; . Localised social effects arising from the impacts on reserves. These effects range from minor to significant. Businesses will also be affected by the need to relocate, or effects on their access; . Effects on cultural heritage and Tangata Whenua values, which will be mitigated by managing effects on water, ecology, and identifying opportunities for Tangata Whenua to exercise kaitiakitanga; Give details of the extent to which alternative sites, routes, and methods have been considered. Section 7 of the AEE sets out the alternatives considered for the Project. Give details of the reasons why the public work (or project or work) and the designation (or alteration) are reasonably necessary for achieving the objectives of the requiring authority. The work and alteration of the designation are reasonably necessary for achieving the objectives of the requiring authority because: The NZ Transport Agency’s objective under Section 94 of the Land Transport Management Act 2003 (LTMA) is ‘to undertake its functions in a way that contributes
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Waterview Connection Motorway
    Waterview Connection Information Sheet THE WATERVIEW CONNECTION MOTORWAY WHEN WILL THE WATERVIEW WHAT ARE THE TRAFFIC WHAT IS THE CONNECTION OPEN TO BENEFITS OF THE WATERVIEW TRAFFIC? WATERVIEW CONNECTION? Construction is on schedule for opening in early By bridging the gap between the Southwestern CONNECTION? 2017 as planned. and Northwestern motorways, the Waterview Connection will complete Auckland’s Western Being built is 5km of 6-lane motorway Ring Route. This is a 48km motorway link from to connect State Highways 20 (the Manukau in the south to Albany in the north that Southwestern Motorway) and 16 (the WHO WILL OPERATE will bypass central Auckland. Northwestern Motorway). THE MOTORWAY? Completing the Western Ring Route has been There will be three lanes southbound and prioritised as a Road of National Significance three lanes northbound between Maioro The Well-Connected Alliance, which is building because of the contribution it will make to New Street, where S.H.20 now ends, and the the Waterview Connection, will form an alliance Zealand’s future prosperity. It will provide Auckland Great North Road interchange on S.H.16. with international tunnel controls specialists SICE NZ Ltd (Sociedad Ibérica de Construcciones with a resilient and reliable motorway network by Half of the new motorway is underground in Eléctricas) to operate and maintain the motorway reducing the region’s dependence on the single twin tunnels 2.4km long and up to 30m below for the first 10 years of its life. A team from SICE spine comprising State Highway 1 and the Auckland the surface between the Alan Wood Reserve has worked with the Well-Connected Alliance Harbour Bridge for business to business trips, in Owairaka and Waterview.
    [Show full text]
  • Video Questions and Answers
    Page 1 of 2 Waterview Connection Video Answers Tuesday 26 August 1. Meeting Auckland’s Roading Needs Drive down to the waterfront in the centre of Auckland City and meet Peter Spies from NZTA to find out more about Auckland’s road network. 1. Why are good roads important? They allow people, goods and services to travel easily and efficiently to help the economy 2. What are some of the challenges in providing good roads in Auckland? two harbours, volcanoes and an increasing population 3. What happens if there is an accident on the Harbour Bridge? There are very long delays as it shuts the main route through Auckland. Next step learning: Find out more about the State Highways in your local area and how they have changed over time. 2. The Western Ring – An Alternative Route Find out more about the Auckland Harbour Bridge and discover why Auckland needs the Western Ring Route. 1. How long was it expected to take to complete the Western Ring Route? 15 years 2. What were some of the major projects involved in closing up the gaps in the Western Ring Route? Manukau Extension, the Mount Roskill Project, Manukau Harbour Crossing, Hobsinville Extension 3. Why is the Harbour Bridge not enough to meet transport needs? It cannot be extended, the clip-ons have a limited life and will need replacing Next step learning: Discuss how you think the Western Ring Route will impact on Auckland and how it might affect you. LEARNZ Waterview Connection Field Trip to Auckland – Term 3, 2014 Log in to http://www.learnz.org.nz/waterviewconnection143 Page 2 of 2 3.
    [Show full text]
  • South & East Auckland Auckland Airport
    G A p R D D Paremoremo O N R Sunnynook Course EM Y P R 18 U ParemoremoA O H N R D E M Schnapper Rock W S Y W R D O L R SUNSET RD E R L ABERDEEN T I A Castor Bay H H TARGE SUNNYNOOK S Unsworth T T T S Forrest C Heights E O South & East Auckland R G Hill R L Totara Vale R D E A D R 1 R N AIRA O S Matapihi Point F W F U I T Motutapu E U R RD Stony Batter D L Milford Waitemata THE R B O D Island Thompsons Point Historic HI D EN AR KITCHENER RD Waihihi Harbour RE H Hakaimango Point Reserve G Greenhithe R R TRISTRAM Bayview D Kauri Point TAUHINU E Wairau P Korakorahi Point P DIANA DR Valley U IPATIKI CHIVALRY RD HILLSIDERD 1 A R CHARTWELL NZAF Herald K D Lake Takapuna SUNNYBRAE RD SHAKESPEARE RD ase RNZAF T Pupuke t Island 18 Glenfield AVE Takapuna A Auckland nle H Takapuna OCEAN VIEW RD kland a I Golf Course A hi R Beach Golf Course ro O ia PT T a E O Holiday Palm Beach L R HURSTMERE RD W IL D Park D V BEACH HAVEN RD NORTHCOTE R N Beach ARCHERS RD Rangitoto B S P I O B E K A S D A O Island Haven I RD R B R A I R K O L N U R CORONATION RD O E Blackpool H E Hillcrest R D A A K R T N Church Bay Y O B A SM K N D E N R S Birkdale I R G Surfdale MAN O’WAR BAY RD Hobsonville G A D R North Shore A D L K A D E Rangitawhiri Point D E Holiday Park LAK T R R N OCEANRALEIGH VIEW RD I R H E A R E PUPUKE Northcote Hauraki A 18 Y D EXMOUTH RD 2 E Scott Pt D RD L R JUTLAND RD E D A E ORAPIU RD RD S Birkenhead V I W K D E A Belmont W R A L R Hauraki Gulf I MOKO ONEWA R P IA RD D D Waitemata A HINEMOA ST Waiheke LLE RK Taniwhanui Point W PA West Harbour OLD LAKE Golf Course Pakatoa Point L E ST Chatswood BAYSWATER VAUXHALL RD U 1 Harbour QUEEN ST Bayswater RD Narrow C D Motuihe KE NS R Luckens Point Waitemata Neck Island AWAROA RD Chelsea Bay Golf Course Park Point Omiha Motorway .
    [Show full text]
  • Auckland Transport Quarterly Report
    Auckland Transport Quarterly Report Quarter ended 30 September 2017 New electronic ticketing gates at Ōtāhuhu station Auckland Transport Quarterly Report – Quarter ended 30 September 2017 Page 1 of 25 Table of Contents 1. Executive summary 3 2. Strategic issues and focus areas 5 3. Highlights for the last quarter 12 4. Future outlook 12 5. Key deliverables 14 6. Financial performance 16 7. Performance measures 17 8. Contribution to Māori outcomes 22 9. Key Local Board Issues 24 10. Risk Management 25 Auckland Transport Quarterly Report – Quarter ended 30 September 2017 Page 2 of 25 1. Executive summary Strategic Context Auckland Transport (AT) has made significant progress in recent years, with major improvements in the public transport system, strong patronage growth, increasing customer satisfaction ratings, commencement of the City Rail Link and investment in active modes of transport, particularly cycling facilities. However, despite this progress, these achievements are quickly becoming neutralised by Auckland’s rapidly increasing population and the emerging impacts of an historical infrastructure deficit. Unprecedented growth in Auckland’s population is driving a significant increase in the demand for travel, putting severe pressure on the transport network and causing sustained levels of high congestion on the arterial network, although this has eased to an extent by the opening of the Waterview Tunnel. In the past quarter, AT has begun preparing the next suite of ten year planning documents (Long Term Plan, Regional Land Transport Plan and the Regional Public Transport Programme). These plans will need innovative and customer focused solutions on a tight budget. At the same time, AT has continued solid delivery of core business.
    [Show full text]
  • Opus Consultation and Community Engagement Report
    Appendix F Opus Consultation and Community Engagement Report Document No. NCI-1PRM-4COM-RPT-0103 Project No. 250310 This page has been intentionally left blank. Document No. NCI-1PRM-4COM-RPT-0103 Project No. 250310 Northern Corridor Improvements Project Stakeholder and Community Engagement Report September 2015 Northern Corridor Improvements Project Stakeholder and Community Engagement Report September 2015 Prepared By Tania Reynolds Opus International Consultants Ltd Community Engagement Specialist Auckland Environmental Office The Westhaven, 100 Beaumont St PO Box 5848, Auckland 1141 New Zealand Reviewed By Telephone: +64 9 355 9500 Rebekah Pokura-Ward Facsimile: +64 9 355 9584 Technical Principal Environmental Management Date: September 2015 Reference: 1-T0086.00 Status: Version 2 Approved for Release By Phil Harrison – Design Manager © Opus International Consultants Ltd 2015 Northern Corridor Improvements Project i Contents 1 Introduction ....................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Project Overview ............................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Project Objectives .............................................................................................................. 3 1.3 Project Timeframes ........................................................................................................... 4 2 Engagement Strategy.........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Auckland Regional Land Transport Plan 2015-2025 Auckland Transport
    18pt Auckland Regional Land Transport Plan 2015-2025 Auckland Transport Adapted in accordance with Section 69 of the Copyright Act 1994 by the Royal New Zealand Foundation of the Blind, for the sole use of persons who have a print disability. No unauthorised copying is permitted. Produced 2015 by Accessible Format Production, Blind Foundation, Auckland Total print pages: 137 Total large print pages: 315 Publishing Information This large print edition is a transcription of the following print edition: Published by Auckland Council, 6 Henderson Valley Road, Henderson, Auckland © Auckland Transport 2015 Logos represented on the publication cover: NZ Land Transport Agency, KiwiRail, Auckland Council, Auckland Transport Large Print Edition Main text is in Arial typeface, 18 point. Headings, in order of significance, are indicated as: Heading 1 Heading 2 The publisher's page numbering is indicated in text as: Page 1 Omissions and Alterations Brief descriptions have been given in the place of figures. These figures include diagrams, graphs and maps. Where the figure is made up largely of text elements (for example a flowchart), it has been transcribed in full. Map descriptions focus on the scope of the map rather than the details. Notes from the transcriber have been prefaced by "TN" (transcriber's note). Contact Auckland Transport for further Information For extended verbal descriptions of maps or for further information on the maps please call Auckland Transport, (09) 301 0101, or email [email protected]. Please make it clear your query relates to the Regional Land Transport Plan. If you email us please provide your name and a contact phone number.
    [Show full text]
  • Attachment 2
    Attachme nt 2 Appendix 1 Table 1A: Auckland Transport Proposed Funded Capital Programme for AT Board approval (20th June 2018) Prioritisation Key: 1 Committed/Ring-fenced The following programme has been developed for the Regional Land Transport Plan 2018-28. Indicative project costs (nominal values, including inflation) represent the estimated cost of project/programme delivered 2 Funded by Auckland Transport, including any financial assistance from the Transport Agency unless stated otherwise. 3 Unfunded Projects carried forward from 2017/18 ($m) 2024/25 - Project Name Project Description Prioritisation Duration 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 2027/28 Albany Station P&R Extension stage 1 1 2018/19 0.5 Double Decker Network Mitigation 1 2018/19 3.7 Ormiston Town Centre Main Street Link 1 2018/19 6.9 Rail Crossing Safety Improvements 1 2018/19 0.2 Rail Crossing Separation (Phase 1B) 1 2018/19 1.9 Rail Crossing Separation (Phase 2) 1 2018/19 3.3 Projects carried forward from 2017/18 Regional Park and Ride Fund 1 2018/19 2.5 SaFE Set-up Rail Integration 1 2018/19 1.0 Takanini Station Upgrade 1 2018/19 1.1 Te Mahia Station Upgrade 1 2018/19 0.9 Wiri EMU Depot Extension (Wiri II) 1 2018/19 6.0 Other projects 1 2018/19 38.0 Committed, Ring-fenced, On-going Operational and Renewal Projects and Programmes (Alphabetical order, $m) 2024/25 - Project Name Project Description Prioritisation Duration 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 2027/28 Committed Projects and Programmes Phases 1 of the Albany park'n'ride extension to increase capacity and patronage on the Northern Albany Station P&R Extension stage 1 1 2018/19 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Busway.
    [Show full text]
  • VINCI Construction Selected to Build Major New Motorway Connection in Auckland, New Zealand
    Rueil-Malmaison, 21 February 2018 VINCI Construction selected to build major new motorway connection in Auckland, New Zealand • Design-build of a major new motorway connection in New Zealand’s economic capital, Auckland • Project with a value of $700 million New Zealand dollars (around €415 million) VINCI Construction subsidiary HEB Construction, has been chosen as part of an alliance contract 1 to build the Northern Corridor Improvements Project (NCI Project). With a total value of $700 million New- Zealand dollars (around €415 million), the contract aims at creating a new connection north of Auckland between the Northern Motorway (State Highway 1) and Upper Harbour Highway (State Highway 18), as well as extending the Northern Busway to Albany and add more than 7 kilometres of new walking and cycling paths. The NCI Project Alliance comprises the New Zealand Transport Agency, HEB Construction, Fulton Hogan, Opus and Jacobs. The project is an important link in helping to realize the full benefits of the Western Ring Route by giving users an alternative route to State Highway 1 and the Auckland Harbour Bridge. It will also create better travel choices for walkers, cyclists and users of public transport. The Alliance is now tasked with finalising the detailed design and beginning construction early this year. The project will be undertaken in stages over the next four years. The first steps towards construction will include road resurfacing and the installation of moveable median barriers. The Alliance has started recruiting for more than 150 new roles including surveyors, engineers, safety advisors, machine operators, drainlayers, carpenters and general construction field staff.
    [Show full text]
  • St Lukes Interchange - Project Update
    Board Meeting | 20 February 2015 Agenda item no. 10.1 Open Session St Lukes Interchange - Project Update Recommendation(s) That the Board: i. Notes this update on the status of the St Lukes Interchange project. Executive summary The New Zealand Transport Agency (NZTA) is upgrading the St Luke’s Interchange (the Project) to accommodate future increased traffic demand at the intersection as a consequence of the opening of the SH16/SH20 Waterview Connection in March 2017. NZTA’s proposed upgrade offers Auckland Transport (AT) an opportunity to provide bus priority, cycling and pedestrian improvements (Improvements) at this location as part of the NZTA project. The Improvements were not included in the 2012-2015 RLTP, as the opportunity to deliver the works early through the Project had not been identified. In August 2012, AT and NZTA made an agreement in principle (subject to Board approval if required) that AT would deliver the Improvements through the Project and contribute to the related costs, then estimated to be between $4.5m and $8.0m. The most recent assessment, received in January 2015, puts the estimated total AT cost at $5.5m for which budget is allocated in the 2014/15 Annual Plan. Works to increase the number of lanes on the St Lukes section of the motorway are already underway (Stage 1) and consents to lift and widen the motorway overbridge as well as associated works affecting the St Lukes Interchange were granted to both AT and NZTA for their respective portions in February 2014. NZTA and AT are seeking to provide an additional turning lane for westbound access to the motorway overbridge on Great North Road and additional lane allocation to provide for bus priority through the St Lukes Road-Great North Road intersection.
    [Show full text]
  • Auckland Transport Alignment Project April 2018
    Auckland Transport Alignment Project April 2018 Foreword I welcome the advice provided by the Auckland Transport Alignment Project (ATAP). The ATAP package is a transformative transport programme. Investment in transport shapes our city’s development and is a key contributor to economic, social and environmental goals. The direction signalled in this update is shared by Government and Auckland Council and demonstrates our commitment to working together for a better Auckland. Auckland is facing unprecedented population growth, and over the next 30 years a million more people will call Auckland home. Growth brings opportunities but when combined with historic under- investment in infrastructure the strain on the Auckland transport system is unrelenting. Existing congestion on our roads costs New Zealand’s economy $1.3b annually. We need to do things differently to what has been done in the past. Auckland needs a transport system that provides genuine choice for people, enables access to opportunities, achieves safety, health and environmental outcomes and underpins economic development. Our aspiration must be to make sure Auckland is a world class city. Auckland’s success is important not just for Aucklanders, but for our country’s long-term growth and productivity. The Government and Auckland Council have agreed to a transformative and visionary plan. ATAP is a game-changer for Auckland commuters and the first-step in easing congestion and allowing Auckland to move freely. I believe this ATAP package marks a significant step in building a modern transport system in Auckland. ATAP accelerates delivery of Auckland’s rapid transit network, with the aim of unlocking urban development opportunities, encourages walking and cycling, and invests in public transport, commuter and freight rail and funds road improvements.
    [Show full text]
  • Template for Treasury Report
    IN-CONFIDENCE SH-8-6-2-4 Treasury / MoT Report: Business Case for the Waterview Connection Executive Summary This paper outlines the business case for the Waterview Connection as a tunnel and seeks guidance from Ministers as to next steps. Background The Waterview Connection is a proposed extension of State Highway 20 from Mt Roskill to intersect with State Highway 16 at Waterview. The current proposal for the Waterview Connection project is to construct it within twin two-lane tunnels (northbound traffic in one tunnel, southbound in the other), with interchanges at either end. Construction of the Waterview Connection completes the Western Ring Route, a strategic route that links the cities of Manukau, Auckland, Waitakere and North Shore while avoiding SH1 and the Auckland Harbour Bridge. Cost The Waterview Connection is estimated to cost $2.77 billion in 2015 dollars, including the costs of financing the project across the construction period. This is an increase from the published estimate of $1.89 billion in 2015 dollars. The increase in cost has been driven by increases in scope, input cost increases and the inclusion of the costs of financing the project. Scope With the additional traffic volumes that the Waterview Connection brings to the SH16 North- western motorway corridor, it is not possible to integrate the Western Ring Route into the corridor without some form of improvement to SH16. The base Waterview Connection project scope proposes additional lanes in each direction both east and west of the interchange at Waterview. Two alternative scope options have been considered that could vary this scheme.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 13 Auckland’S Transport Nga Takinga Rerenga a Whenua O Ta Maki Makaurau
    - - - CHAPTER 13 AUCKLAND’S TRANSPORT NGA TAKINGA RERENGA A WHENUA O TA MAKI MAKAURAU CHAPTER 13 TRANSPORT UPOKO 13 - NGA ¯ TAKINGA RERENGA A¯ WHENUA O TA¯MAKI MAKAURAU 310 - - - CHAPTER 13 AUCKLAND’S TRANSPORT NGA TAKINGA RERENGA A WHENUA O TA MAKI MAKAURAU 311 - - - CHAPTER 13 AUCKLAND’S TRANSPORT NGA TAKINGA RERENGA A WHENUA O TA MAKI MAKAURAU THE AUCKLAND PLAN THE WORLDS MOST LIVEABLE CITY STRATEGIC DIRECTION 13 CREATE BETTER CONNECTIONS AND ACCESSIBILITY WITHIN AUCKLAND, ACROSS NEW ZEALAND AND TO THE WORLD TARGETS Reduce congestion Increase the levels for vehicles on Increase the Double public proportion of trips the strategic freight proportion of people transport from made by public Reduce road crash network to at or living within walking 70 million trips in transport into the fatalities and serious below the average distance of frequent 2012 to 140 million city centre during the injuries from 506 of 2006-2009 levels public transport trips by 2022 morning peak, from (2010) to no more (average daily speed stops from 14% (subject to additional 47% of all vehicular than 410 in 2020 of 45kph and average (2011) to 32% by funding) trips in 2011 to delay of 32 seconds 2040 70% by 2040 per kilometre) by 2021 PRIORITIES 1 2 3 4 Integrate transport Manage Auckland’s Prioritise and optimise Implement new planning and transport as a single investment across transport funding investment with land system transport modes mechanisms use development 312 1 AUCKLAND EXPECTS SIGNIFICANT IMPROVEMENTS IN ITS TRANSPORT SYSTEM SO THAT IT WORKS WELL 13 CHAPTER FOR BUSINESS, RESIDENTS AND VISITORS, SUPPORTS TRANSPORT AUCKLAND’S AUCKLAND’S DEVELOPMENT, AND CONTRIBUTES TO THE HEALTH AND SAFETY OF ITS PEOPLE AND THE CHARACTER OF ITS PLACES.
    [Show full text]