DOCSLIB.ORG

New Zealand Transport Agency Additional Waitemata

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
New Zealand Transport Agency Additional Waitemata Attachment A New Zealand Transport Agency Additional Waitemata Harbour Crossing Preliminary Business Case Restrictions of this report This report has been prepared by PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) and the New Zealand Institute of Economic Research (NZIER) for the NZ Transport Agency (NZTA) solely for the purposes stated herein and should not be relied upon for any other purpose. We accept no liability to any party should it be used for any purpose other than that for which it was prepared. This Report is strictly confidential and (save to the extent required by applicable law and/or regulation) must not be released to any third party without our express written consent which is at our sole discretion. To the fullest extent permitted by law, PwC accepts no duty of care to any third party in connection with the provision of this Report and/or any related information or explanation (together, the “Information”). Accordingly, regardless of the form of action, whether in contract, tort (including without limitation, negligence) or otherwise, and to the extent permitted by applicable law, PwC accepts no liability of any kind to any third party and disclaims all responsibility for the consequences of any third party acting or refraining to act in reliance on the Information. We have not independently verified the accuracy of information provided to us, and have not conducted any form of audit in respect of NZTA. Accordingly, we express no opinion on the reliability, accuracy, or completeness of the information provided to us and upon which we have relied. The statements and opinions expressed herein have been made in good faith, and on the basis that all information relied upon is true and accurate in all material respects, and not misleading by reason of omission or otherwise. The statements and opinions expressed in this report are based on information available as at the date of the report. We reserve the right, but will be under no obligation, to review or amend our Report, if any additional information, which was in existence on the date of this report was not brought to our attention, or subsequently comes to light. We have relied on forecasts and assumptions prepared by NZTA, Beca, SKM and other parties about future events which, by their nature, are not able to be independently verified. Inevitably, some assumptions may not materialise and unanticipated events and circumstances are likely to occur. Therefore, actual results in the future will vary from the forecasts upon which we have relied. These variations may be material. This report is issued pursuant to the terms and conditions set out in our contract with NZTA. PricewaterhouseCoopers New Zealand Institute of Economic Research i NZ Transport Agency Contents Background reports to be read in conjunction with the Preliminary Business Case......................................................vii 1. Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Purpose........................................................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Dimensions underpinning analysis.................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Relationship of this Preliminary Business Case to Treasury and NZTA guidance ..................................... 1 2. Project Objectives and Scope .................................................................................................................... 6 2.1 Background - Organisational Overview.............................................................................................. 6 2.2 Integrated Planning ........................................................................................................................ 7 3. Description of Service Need ...................................................................................................................... 9 3.1 Background .................................................................................................................................. 9 3.2 Current AHB Corridor Constraints..................................................................................................... 9 3.3 Demand on the Northern Busway ................................................................................................... 10 3.4 Network Resilience ...................................................................................................................... 11 3.5 Freight Management .................................................................................................................... 12 3.6 Active Modes .............................................................................................................................. 13 3.7 Future Transport Network Development .......................................................................................... 13 3.8 Addressing Future Constraints....................................................................................................... 13 3.9 Wider impacts on the New Zealand economy and competitiveness...................................................... 14 4. Key Assumptions................................................................................................................................... 18 4.1 Assumptions around the Do-Minimum............................................................................................. 18 4.2 Assumptions around the Engineering Options .................................................................................. 18 4.3 Assumptions for Economic Analysis................................................................................................ 20 PricewaterhouseCoopers New Zealand Institute of Economic Research ii 4.4 Assumptions around the Funding and Preliminary Business Case ....................................................... 22 5. Summary of Options .............................................................................................................................. 25 5.1 Defining the bridge option and the tunnel option ............................................................................... 25 5.2 Consideration of the retention of the AHB ........................................................................................ 27 6. Financial Analysis .................................................................................................................................. 30 6.1 Introduction................................................................................................................................. 30 7. Economic Analysis................................................................................................................................. 44 8. Risk Assessment and Management.......................................................................................................... 56 8.1 Introduction................................................................................................................................. 56 8.2 Background ................................................................................................................................ 56 8.3 Summary of Key Project Risks....................................................................................................... 59 8.4 Risk profiles of the defined options ................................................................................................. 64 8.5 Opportunities for the Project .......................................................................................................... 65 8.6 Conclusion.................................................................................................................................. 67 9. Procurement ......................................................................................................................................... 68 9.1 Introduction................................................................................................................................. 68 9.2 Procurement objectives ................................................................................................................ 68 9.3 Procurement Options.................................................................................................................... 69 9.4 Evaluation Methodology................................................................................................................ 70 10. Funding Options Analysis........................................................................................................................ 76 10.1 Introduction................................................................................................................................. 76 10.2 Core Funding Options................................................................................................................... 76 10.3 Supplementary funding options ...................................................................................................... 85 10.4 Funding options evaluation criteria.................................................................................................. 89 10.5 Evaluation................................................................................................................................... 91 PricewaterhouseCoopers New Zealand
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Vos Yard and Waterspace Development Single Stage Business Case
    Vos Yard and Waterspace Development Single Stage Business Case Prepared by: Shona McMahon Prepared for: Waterfront Auckland Board Date: 16 April 2013 Version: 4.0 Status: Final Single Stage Business Case Document Control Document Information Position Document ID Vos Yard Development and Waterspace Document Owner Richard Aitken Issue Date 16 April 2013 Last Saved Date 16 April 2013 File Name U:\CCO\Projects\ Document History Version Issue Date Changes 1.0 4/4/2013 GM Property & Assets first review – Options, WP goals, messaging 1.0 5/4/2013 Peter Walker (PVCT) & GM Property & Assets – General review 2.0 10/4/2013 Peter Walker (PVCT) and GM Property & Assets review notes amended 3.0 11/4/2013 PVCT Business Plan and funding plan incorporated 4.0 16/4/2013 General review and refinement and focus on BCR Document Review Role Name Review Status GM Property & Assets Richard Aitken Reviewed v1.0, v3.0 Chair Percy Vos Charitable Peter Walker Reviewed v1.0, v2.0 Trust Project Director Daniel Khong Reviewed v3.0 GM Corporate Services Carl Gosbee Reviewed v3.0 Chief Executive John Dalzell Reviewed v3.0 Document Sign-off Role Name Sign-off Date GM Property & Assets Richard Aitken 16/4/2013 Chief Executive John Dalzell 16/4/2013 Single Stage Business Case | 2 Contents 1. Executive Summary 4 2. Introduction 7 3. Summary of Recommended Option 10 4. The Strategic Case – Making the Case for Investment 15 5. The Economic Case – Determining Best Value for Money 21 6. Commercial Case – Preparing for the Potential Deal 26 7. Financial Case – Affordability and Funding Requirements 30 8.
    [Show full text]
  • Building Bridges Showcase Foreshore Project Receives More Accolades
    QUARTER TWO 2017 Building bridges Showcase foreshore project receives more accolades HOTEL HEAVEN Tourism demand drives building boom COMMERCIAL INVESTOR INCENTIVES Plenty of projects in the pipeline 2015 Site Safe awards winner 2014 Safeguard Winner Silver at NZ Design awards 100% NZ Made Commercial or Residential we cover it all. Call us to discuss any requirements you may have INTAKS is available for purchase and hire A N D D E A L S I E G Z N E W D E N D A E N R D U M T A N U F A C intaks.indd 1 1/05/17 8:33 PM 2015 Site Safe awards winner 2014 Safeguard Winner Taumanu Reserve Bridge 10 Resene Timber Design Awards 23 Silver at NZ Cover stories Cities Materials CONTENTS Design awards Wellington leading the national pack when it Future cities need to focus on liveability and Emission reduction potential, high asset value comes to commercial and industrial sector healthy living, Green Property Summit told 20 and growth in public awareness are driving confidence, Colliers International Research explosive growth in green buildings 22 100% NZ Made reports 6 Design New Zealand should combine its sustainable The largest recreational reclamation in the Major design awards showcased creative timber resources with an innovative Southern Hemisphere has collected yet another uses for wood in everything from architectural manufacturing system to build faster and more major award 10 excellence to engineering innovation 28 efficiently, an overseas expert urges 23 The ongoing tourism boom is boosting demand Facilities Management Commercial or Residential for new hotels throughout the country but will it Property A global leader in architectural revolving doors we cover it all.
    [Show full text]
  • Auckland Regional Transport Authority
    THE JOURNEY Auckland Regional Transport Authority Annual Report 2009 ARTA ANNUAL REPORT 2009 – THE JOURNEY THE JOURNEY 1973 “Robbie’s rapid rail”, electrified rail and underground CBD rail loop proposed by Mayor Dove-Meyer Robinson 1976 Plans cancelled 1993 Government sells NZ Railways to private operator 1993-2000 TranzRail underinvests in Auckland rail system 1995 Auckland Bus Priorities Initiative launched 1996 Link bus service introduced in CBD 1998 First dedicated bus lanes in Sandringham and New North roads 1999 Disused Auckland Railway Station converted to flats 2000 Government and ARC buy back Auckland rail assets from TranzRail 2003 Britomart Station opens, first refurbished trains in service 2004 Connex (Veolia) contracted to run rail services, ARTA is formed to implement the Auckland Regional Land Transport Strategy 2004 North Western Cycleway opened, double tracking of the Western Line begins (Project Boston) 2006 Upgrade of Spaghetti Junction motorway corridor complete 2007 The first integrated Auckland Transport Plan 2008 Northern Busway opens, 40% tertiary discount fares introduced, SuperGold Card introduced for free senior travel, free public transport integrated into events and leisure tickets 2009 Highest patronage of public transport since 1985 with rail up 97% in past five years, 21 rail stations upgraded, customer satisfaction with public transport reaches 84%, SH20 extension opens, real time bus information at high priority stops 2010 New stations due to open at Newmarket and New Lynn, Kingsland Station upgraded,
    [Show full text]
  • Section 32 Plan Change 3 Wynyard Quarter
    Auckland Regional Plan: Coastal Proposed Plan Change 3 Wynyard Quarter SECTION 32 REPORT July 2007 Auckland Regional Council Section 32 Report for Auckland Regional Plan: Coastal, Proposed Plan Change 3, Wynyard Quarter – July 2007 2 Auckland Regional Council TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION Purpose and Scope of the Section 32 Report 2 STATUTORY FRAMEWORK 2.1 Part II of the RMA 2.2 Purpose of Regional Coastal Plans 2.3 New Zealand Coastal Policy Statement and Auckland Regional Policy Statement 2.4 Section 32 Requirements 2.5 Initial Evaluation of Management Alternatives 3 ASSESSMENT OF PLAN CHANGE 3 – WYNYARD QUARTER 3.1 Purpose of Plan Change 3.2 Summary of Key Changes 3.3 Background Work – Auckland Waterfront Vision 2040 and Consultation Summary 3.4 Do the Objectives Achieve the Purpose of the RMA? 3.5 Evaluation of Policies and Methods – Efficiency and Effectiveness 3.6 Evaluation of Policies and Methods – Costs, Benefits and Risks 4 CONCLUSION Abbreviations used in this report: ACC – Auckland City Council ARC – Auckland Regional Council CMA – Coastal Marine Area HGMPA – Hauraki Gulf Marine Park Act 2000 HSEW – Halsey Street Extension Wharf NZCPS – New Zealand Coastal Policy Statement 1994 PMA – Port Management Area POAL – Ports of Auckland Ltd RMA – Resource Management Act 1991 RPC – Auckland Regional Plan: Coastal 2004 RPS – Auckland Regional Policy Statement 1999 Section 32 Report for Auckland Regional Plan: Coastal, Proposed Plan Change 3, Wynyard Quarter – July 2007 3 Auckland Regional Council Section 32 Report for Auckland Regional Plan: Coastal, Proposed Plan Change 3, Wynyard Quarter – July 2007 4 Auckland Regional Council 1 INTRODUCTION The Auckland Regional Council (ARC) has prepared a proposed plan change to the Auckland Regional Plan: Coastal 2004 (RPC).
    [Show full text]
  • A U C K L a N D C O U N C
    A U C K L A N D C O U N C I L Decision following the hearing of an application for resource consent SUBJECT: Application for resource consent under section 88 of the Resource Management Act 1991 by Peers Brown Miller Ltd to remove two notable pohutukawa trees from within a grove at 8 Minnehaha Avenue, Takapuna held on Monday, 17 November 2014 commencing at 9.31am CONSENT, PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 104 AND 104B OF THE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ACT, IS REFUSED. THE FULL DECISION IS SET OUT BELOW Hearing Panel: The Application was heard by Hearings Commissioners consisting of: Ms Kathleen Ryan (Chairperson) Mr Hugh Leersnyder Council Officers: Ms Sally Robins Senior Planner Mr Steven Krebs Arborist Ms Rebecca Fogel Built Heritage Specialist Ms Melissa Democracy Advisor - Hearings Warmenhoven APPEARANCES: For the applicant: Peers Brown Miller Ltd on behalf of N M Growth Limited, represented by: Andrew Braggins (legal counsel) calling the following as witnesses: Sarah Aynsley - Applicant Roger Twiname – Structural Engineer Ross Thurlow – Structural Engineer Rob Pryor – Landscape Architect Gerard Mostert - Arborist Submitters: Maurice Norton for Environment Takapuna Inc Mike Smith Peter Cunningham Hueline Massey for the Tree Council: and Chris Boucher, Arborist, as witness 1 APPLICATION DESCRIPTION Application and Property Details Application Number (s): LX2138339 Site Address: 8 Minnehaha Avenue, Takapuna Applicant's Name: Peers Brown Miller Ltd on behalf of N M Growth Ltd Lodgement Date: 0 August 2013 Notification date: 24 June 2014 Submissions closed
    [Show full text]
  • Auckland Waterfront Development. Connecting People to the Sea And
    Peter Casey Auckland Waterfront Remodelación del frente Development. marítimo de Auckland. Connecting People Aproximar la gente to the Sea and City al mar y a la ciudad The first step in a 25-year journey is underway to transform an En la actualidad se está tomando el que habrá que someter el suelo en algu- unloved, port-related industrial area in downtown Auckland, New primer paso en un largo recorrido que ha nas zonas a diversos tratamientos para durado 25 años para llevar a cabo la descontaminarlo antes de que se Zealand, into the active, vibrant, waterfront that people want. The reconversión de una zona industrial non empiece con la construcción de las obras development is known as the Sea + City project and is an integral grata en el centro de Auckland, Nueva públicas y privadas. part of a wider plan to re-connect Aucklander's to the harbour they Zelanda, y transformarlo en un frente Otro aspecto del proyecto que ya se ha marítimo activo, vibrante y lleno de vida, iniciado es el de fortalecer el muelle love. que es lo que la gente quiere. El proyec- principal e iniciar las obras donde se van Auckland – known as the City of Sails – boasts one of the most to se llama the Sea +C ity Project a crear espacios públicos, centros comer- beautiful harbours in the world and has a thriving downtown (Proyecto Mar + Ciudad) y constituye una ciales, oficinas y una zona de ocio. parte integral de un plan más amplio Asimismo se están llevando a cabo business centre and major port.
    [Show full text]
  • Kaipatiki Local Board.20110510.Minutesattachments
    Item 18 Attachment D Prioritisation table of initiatives. The Kaipatiki Local Board is seeking funding for the initiatives in the following table for its 2011/12 Local Board Agreement (note: this is not a ranked list). Initiative Rationale Costs Enhancement of all local A number of existing local Unknown assets that serve a regional or parks and facilities within sub-regional function such as Kaipatiki provide for sub- netball, football etc and regional and regional provide support for the club activities. To ensure on-going that use the facilities levels of service are maintained and enhanced regional support for the costs of these facilities should be provided at a regional level. Improvements to the North The North Shore Events Unknown Shore Events Centre Centre requires climate including climate control and control for minimum sound proofing standards for the National Basketball League (for the NZ Breakers) and sound proofing to minimise adverse effects on neighbours. Improvements to the venue will provide opportunities to secure other events Urgently undertake the de- Ponds require urgent Onepoto c$70k silting of Onepoto, Link Drive, maintenance for the de- Chelsea Chelsea and Totaravale silting: Others Unknown stormwater ponds - offensive odours; - wildlife is dying and - the silt is causing problems for recreational users. Development of parking on The site purchase for Unknown vacant site of 450 Glenfield additional parking in Road Glenfield. Budget needs to be provided to remove the house and establish the parking. Site is in an unacceptable condition. Northcote Mainstreet Gateway Identified through the Town Unknown project Centre plan as a priority. Land has become available for the gateway and is needed for this centre identified for growth.
    [Show full text]
  • Changes to the Marine Biota of the Auckland Harbour, by F. I
    TANE 29, 1983 CHANGES TO THE MARINE BIOTA OF THE AUCKLAND HARBOUR by F. I. Dromgoole* and B. A. Fostert * Department of Botany, University of Auckland, Private Bag, Auckland t Department of Zoology, University of Auckland, Private Bag, Auckland SUMMARY The history of study of the marine biota of Auckland Harbour is briefly reviewed, and it is concluded that there is insufficient documented information to make quantitative assessment of changes that have resulted from reclamation, sedimentation and pollution that have occurred with the development of the Port of Auckland. Losses of mangrove and saltmarsh communities are indisputable, but causes of declines in populations of Zostera, Pomatoceros and Perna are not so clear. On the other hand, a number of species have been introduced, and circumstantial evidence suggests these adventives have arrived as ship- fouling. Cases discussed are Codium fragile tomentosoides, Colpomenia bullosa, Limaria orientalis and Sagartia luciae. The most conspicuous newcomer, the oyster Crassostrea gigas, may have been deliberately introduced. INTRODUCTION Regular use of the Auckland Harbour by European ships stems from the early 1800s, so there has been ample opportunity for the introduction of adventive fouling species. Maritime reclamation in Auckland Harbour dates back to about 1860 when shores near the commercial centre were filled and extended as wharves and breakwaters. Modification of habitats and inhabitants of the harbour has now been going on for more than 120 years, but scientific study of them has been of much shorter duration. In this paper we wish to document some additions and alterations to the marine biology. Auckland Harbour has three parts (see Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Devonport Bayswater Hauraki
    Devonport Routes Fare Zones 801 Bayswater Ferry Terminal, Takapuna, Akoranga Station Bayswater 802 Bayswater, Esmonde Rd, Wellesley St, City Centre (Mayoral Dr) & Boundaries (Monday to Friday peak only) Wellsford 806 Stanley Point, Devonport Ferry Terminal Hauraki Omaha 807 Cheltenham, Devonport Ferry Terminal Matakana 814 Devonport Ferry Terminal, Narrow Neck, Takapuna, Warkworth Northern Bus & Ferry Timetable Akoranga Station Devonport to City Ferry Warkworth Bayswater to City Ferry Stanley Bay to City Ferry Waiwera Helensville Hibiscus Coast Your guide to buses and ferries in this area Devonport to Waiheke Island Ferry Orewa Wainui Kaukapakapa Hibiscus Coast Gulf Harbour Waitoki Other timetables available in this area that may interest you Upper North Shore Timetable Routes Albany Waiheke Campbells Bay, Sunnynook, Constellation Lower North Shore 82, 83, 842, 843, 845, 856, 871, 907 Riverhead Milford, Takapuna Hauraki Gulf Takapuna Rangitoto Long Bay, Torbay, Browns Bay, Island 83, 856, 861, 865, 878 Huapai Westgate City 801 802 806 Mairangi Bay Isthmus Waitemata Harbour Britomart Swanson 97B, 97R, 97V, 917, 931, 933, 941, Kingsland Newmarket Beachlands Beach Haven, Birkenhead 942, 966, Beach Haven Ferry, Henderson Birkenhead Ferry Waitakere Panmure New Lynn Waitakere Onehunga 807 814 95B, 95C, 95G, 906, 917, 939, 941, Ranges Otahuhu Botany Glenfield, Bayview, Windy Ridge Birkenhead Ferry Manukau Hillcrest, Northcote 923, 924, 926, 928, 942 Manukau Airport Manukau Harbour North Greenhithe, Unsworth Heights, 120, 901, 906, 907 Wairau
    [Show full text]
  • Facts and Issues: Towards a National Infrastructure Plan
    ISBN: 978-0-478-33080-9 (online) NOT GOVERNMENT POLICY Note to Reader The Minister for Infrastructure indicated in his recent speech to the ‘Building Nations’ Symposium that the National Infrastructure Plan “…will evolve through time. The first draft should be ready early next year. Areas not identified in the plan will not necessarily be excluded from future public investment. It will be updated regularly - and no doubt we will get better at doing it.” This document is a precursor to the Plan. It contains a sector-by-sector description of New Zealand’s existing infrastructure, information about planned investment and a description of current policy settings. We would now like to answer a number of questions: 1. Base information: Is the sectoral analysis contained here an accurate and informative description of the sector? If not, what changes are required to make it so? 2. Missing issues: Are there important infrastructure issues not mentioned in this document? 3. Decision-making: This document suggests that for projects to contribute to community/national welfare and economic growth, they must have expected benefits (measured comprehensively) that are greater than their estimated costs (also measured comprehensively) – see the decision-making principles in the ‘Policy Context’ chapter. As well as considering distributional or equity considerations, are there other considerations that should be taken into account and if so, what is the case for that? 4. Cross-sectoral issues: What cross-sectoral issues are faced by operators/users of infrastructure in each sector? This document identifies a number of cross sectoral issues. Are there other cross-sectoral issues that should be included in a National Infrastructure Plan? 5.
    [Show full text]
  • 65 YEARS of PRESTRESSING CONCRETE in NEW ZEALAND BRIDGES JAMIL KHAN1, GEOFF BROWN2 1Technical Director
    65 YEARS OF PRESTRESSING CONCRETE IN NEW ZEALAND BRIDGES JAMIL KHAN1, GEOFF BROWN2 1Technical Director - Structural Engineering, Beca Ltd, Wellington, New Zealand 2Senior Technical Director - Structural Engineering, Beca Ltd, Wellington, New Zealand SUMMARY Prestressing has played an important role in extending the span capability and economy of concrete bridges. The history of bridge construction in New Zealand has proved that prestressed concrete is an excellent material for constructing bridges and Kiwi engineers made considerable early use of prestressed concrete in bridge construction. Kiwi engineers love new ideas and embrace new technologies. New Zealand bridge engineers, from the early days, were not afraid to take on the challenge of working with new and innovative materials. INTRODUCTION Prestressed Concrete is one of the most cost effective and durable construction materials and can provide many advantages over other materials. Originating in France, prestressing in bridge construction was introduced in early 1950’s. In the United Kingdom, the first major prestressed concrete road bridge was the replacement for Northam Bridge[24], Southampton in 1954. Walnut Lane Bridge in Philadelphia completed in late 1950, is considered the first prestressed concrete bridge in the USA[25]. It is remarkable that New Zealand, as a remote country at the end of the world, made considerable early use of prestressed concrete in bridge construction. IPENZ’s records indicate that in 1954 the Hutt Estuary Bridge[18] used post-tensioned prestressed concrete for the first time in New Zealand. Upper Hutt City Council also claims their Bridge Road Bridge B8/1, built in 1954 over the Akatarawa River, was the first prestressed bridge in New Zealand[17].
    [Show full text]
  • Before the Auckland Unitary Plan Independent Hearings Panel
    BEFORE THE AUCKLAND UNITARY PLAN INDEPENDENT HEARINGS PANEL IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 and the Local Government (Auckland Transitional Provisions) Act 2010 AND IN THE MATTER of TOPIC 081d Rezoning and Precincts (Geographical Areas) AND IN THE MATTER of the submissions and further submissions set out in the Parties and Issues Report STATEMENT OF EVIDENCE OF ERYN JAMES SHIELDS ON BEHALF OF AUCKLAND COUNCIL WEST SUB-REGIONAL OVERVIEW 26 JANUARY 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. SUMMARY ...................................................................................................................... 2 PART A – OVERVIEW AND BACKGROUND ........................................................................ 3 2. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 3 3. CODE OF CONDUCT ..................................................................................................... 3 4. SCOPE ............................................................................................................................ 3 5. STATUTORY AND POLICY FRAMEWORK ................................................................... 4 6. RELEVANT PLANNING DOCUMENTS .......................................................................... 4 PART B - SUB REGIONAL OVERVIEW ................................................................................ 7 7. DESCRIPTION OF WEST AUCKLAND .......................................................................... 7 8. STRATEGIC
    [Show full text]