DOCSLIB.ORG

Before a Board of Inquiry East West Link Project

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

BEFORE A BOARD OF INQUIRY EAST WEST LINK PROJECT UNDER the Resource Management Act 1991 (the RMA) AND IN THE MATTER OF Notices of requirement for designation and resource consent applications by the NEW ZEALAND TRANSPORT AGENCY for the East West Link Project STATEMENT OF PRIMARY EVIDENCE OF ANDREW PETER MURRAY ON BEHALF OF THE NEW ZEALAND TRANSPORT AGENCY Traffic and Transportation Dated: 12 April 2017 Barristers and Solicitors Auckland Solicitor Acting: Pat Mulligan Email: [email protected] Tel 64 9 358 2555 Fax 64 9 358 2055 PO Box 1433 DX CP24024 Auckland 1140 CONTENTS 1. SUMMARY OF EVIDENCE 1 2. INTRODUCTION 4 3. CODE OF CONDUCT 5 4. SCOPE OF EVIDENCE 5 PART A: PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ASSESSMENT OF ALTERNATIVES 6 5. OVERVIEW OF THE PROJECT AND MY ROLE 6 6. ASSESSMENT OF ALTERNATIVES 12 7. CONSULTATION AND MITIGATION BY DESIGN 17 PART B: ASSESSMENT OF EFFECTS 19 8. ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY 19 9. EXISTING AND FUTURE TRANSPORT ENVIRONMENT 25 10. ASSESSMENT OF EFFECTS ON TRAVEL TIMES, TRAVEL TIME RELIABILITY AND TRAFFIC FLOWS 35 11. EFFECTS ON ACCESS 44 12. IMPACT ON PARKING 48 13. IMPACT ON THE RAIL NETWORK 50 14. ASSESSMENT OF WALKING AND CYCLING EFFECTS 52 15. ASSESSMENT OF PUBLIC TRANSPORT EFFECTS (BUS) 52 16. SAFETY PERFORMANCE 53 PART C: RESPONSES 54 17. RESPONSE TO AUCKLAND COUNCIL'S 149 ISSUES REPORT/OTHER REPORTS 54 18. RESPONSE TO SUBMISSIONS 55 19. KEY ISSUES 55 20. SPECIFIC SUBMISSIONS 71 21. COMMENT ON CONDITIONS 87 22. CONCLUSION 87 ANNEXURE 1 89 ANNEXURE 2 93 ANNEXURE 3 94 ANNEXURE 4 95 ANNEXURE 5 97 ANNEXURE 6 101 ANNEXURE 7 106 ANNEXURE 8 108 BF\56816011\9 1. SUMMARY OF EVIDENCE 1.1 This statement describes the development, outcomes and effects of the East West Link (Project) in regards to the transport network. The walking and cycling elements are discussed in my second statement, with this focussing on the effects on the road and public transport networks. It addresses the Project objectives: (a) To improve travel times and travel reliability between businesses in the Onehunga-Penrose industrial areas and SH1 and SH20; and (b) To improve journey time reliability for buses between SH20 and Onehunga Town centre. Existing and Future Environment 1.2 I consider these objectives address the existing and future problems, which my assessment identifies as: (a) Highly congested, unreliable and inconsistent journey times accessing SH1 and SH20 from this area. For example, entering the area from SH1 at Highbrook typically varies between 6 and 18 minutes across a day; (b) Poor accessibility for local businesses, with conflict between through and local access traffic on Neilson Street, Church Street and Great South Road; (c) Congested and unreliable journeys for buses accessing Onehunga from SH20. Bus journey times vary between 3 and nearly 14 minutes across the day; (d) Use of residential streets to access the industrial areas due to congested strategic connections; (e) An incomplete walking and cycling network that is significantly impacted by high traffic and truck movements through Onehunga; (f) The current network constraints are constraining growth, including for public transport access and rail freight distribution and the significant growth pressure on this network will exacerbate the access problems. Project Development 1.3 The NZ Transport Agency undertook a comprehensive consideration of alternative methods, corridors and alignments. That same process has also been used to asses further alternative options suggested via the public engagement process. BF\56816011\9 | Page 1 1.4 The Project was developed in an iterative way that included changes to address effects and feedback from the public and stakeholders. This has included design coordination with Auckland Transport’s plans for Mass Rapid Transit to the airport. Effects of project on Travel Times and Traffic Flows 1.5 There are significant positive outcomes regarding travel time and reliability accessing the Onehunga-Penrose area, as well as positive effects on the wider road network: (a) Significant travel time savings for business vehicles accessing the Onehunga- Penrose industrial area to the strategic network, including: (i) Reductions accessing SH1 north of up to 6.3 minutes (37%) (ii) Reductions accessing SH1 south of up to 18 minutes (68%) (iii) Reductions accessing SH20 north of up to 4.1 minutes (43%) (iv) Reductions accessing SH20 south of up to 6.5 minutes (48%) (b) Improved journey times over a wider area are also expected, including up to 9 minutes between SH20 and Highbrook, 3 minutes between Royal Oak and the Airport and up to 5 minutes between Pakuranga and the Airport. (c) Significant improvements in the consistency and reliability of access is expected, including the range of travel times (across the directions and times of day) accessing SH1 south reducing from 16 minutes to 2 minutes. The more consistent and reliable access is expected to allow improved and more flexible journey and logistics planning and result in increased freight efficiency. 1.6 Traffic is predicted to move to the EWL, with large reductions in flows (and therefore congestion), seen on Neilson Street, Church Street and Great South Road. This will allow easier access to properties and local streets. 1.7 Reductions in truck movements are also expected in residential areas such as Favona Road, Mt Smart Road, Mt Albert Road, Campbell Road and Princes Street. Assessment of Public transport and Rail network 1.8 Bus journeys from SH20 to Onehunga are expected to be up to 5 minutes quicker with journeys becoming uncongested and consistent over the day. This will improve the attractiveness of the bus system, improve linkages to the rail network and reduce bus BF\56816011\9 | Page 2 operating costs. Significant journey time savings on eight other bus routes are expected, due to the reduced traffic flows and congestion on those routes. 1.9 The project has been designed to integrate with Auckland Transport’s plans for Mass Rapid Transit to the Airport. The improved freight and business access is also expected to contribute to greater efficiency of the road/rail freight interface. Assessment of parking, access and roads with increased traffic 1.10 There are some properties on Gloucester Park Road, Onehunga Mall, Onehunga Harbour Road and Sylvia Park Road that will have longer local access movements, however, these are off-set in my opinion by improved access to the wider network. 1.11 The upgraded interchange at Princes Street is expected to better manage motorway queuing and allow local traffic to move around queues. This will significantly improve the quality and resilience of access to this community. 1.12 The change in function on roads such as Onehunga Harbour Road, Galway Street, Captain Springs Road, Hugo Johnston Drive and Sylvia Park Road will require loss of some existing parking. Generally, this loss can be accommodated by the existing spare capacity, however, specific mitigation of some parking has been included. Response to Submissions 1.13 I have assessed the submissions related to transport matters, and provided additional detail and responses. I support the modified conditions DC11 and DC12 included in the evidence of Ms Hopkins. Conclusion 1.14 Based on my detailed assessment of the project, I consider that: (a) The existing transport problems are significant, affect both the local area and the wider network and occur over significant proportions of the day; (b) The Project Objectives suitably address those problems; (c) That the transport works are necessary to meet those objectives; (d) That the identified transport effects have been avoided or mitigated, or as related to some longer access movements, are offset by the reduced access times to the wider network; and BF\56816011\9 | Page 3 (e) That the project strongly achieves its objectives, with substantial benefits to both the local area and the wider network. 2. INTRODUCTION 2.1 My full name is Andrew Peter Murray. I have a BE (Hons) (Civil) from the University of Auckland (1990) and am a Member of the Transportation Group of IPENZ and Committee member of NZ Modelling User Group. 2.2 I currently hold the position of Technical Director at Beca Limited (Beca). I have 26 years’ experience in transportation with core experience in traffic engineering, transportation planning and transport modelling. I have prepared and reviewed Transport Assessments for a range of large-scale projects, including both land use changes and transport infrastructure. I regularly provide expert evidence to the consenting process, including Council hearings, Environment Court and Boards of Inquiry (Waterview Connection, MacKays to Peka Expressway and Christchurch Southern Motorway Stage 2). 2.3 I have been involved in the following relevant projects: (a) East West Connections Business Cases: The Transport Agency and Auckland Transport, 2013-2015; (b) SH20 Waterview Connection: The Transport Agency, 2000 – present; Modelling, Transport Planning, Traffic engineering and expert evidence to Board of Inquiry; (c) MacKays to Peka Expressway: The Transport Agency, 2010 – 2013; Modelling, Transport Planning and expert evidence to Board of Inquiry; (d) Auckland-Manukau Transport Initiative (AMETI): Auckland Transport, 2009 – ongoing; Modelling and transport planning; (e) Wellington Modelling Advice Ngauranga to Airport: The Transport Agency, 2015-ongoing; Technical advice on modelling and scenario analysis; (f) PENLINK Project, Rodney District Council and Auckland Transport, 1997-2015: Modelling, transport planning, input to Business Case and AEE and evidence to consent hearing; BF\56816011\9 | Page 4 (g) Christchurch Southern Motorway Board of Inquiry Consenting: The Transport Agency, 2012: Modelling, Transport Planning and evidence to Board of Inquiry; and (h) Auckland Transport Models Refresh, Auckland Forecasting Centre (AFC), 2016 to present: Team Leader for model update. 2.4 I lead the team that prepared the Traffic and Transportation Assessment (TA) lodged in support of the Notice of Requirement (NoR) assessing the traffic and transportation effects of the operation of the East West Link Project (the EWL or Project).
Recommended publications
  • The Waterview Connection Motorway

    The Waterview Connection Motorway

    Waterview Connection Information Sheet THE WATERVIEW CONNECTION MOTORWAY WHEN WILL THE WATERVIEW WHAT ARE THE TRAFFIC WHAT IS THE CONNECTION OPEN TO BENEFITS OF THE WATERVIEW TRAFFIC? WATERVIEW CONNECTION? Construction is on schedule for opening in early By bridging the gap between the Southwestern CONNECTION? 2017 as planned. and Northwestern motorways, the Waterview Connection will complete Auckland’s Western Being built is 5km of 6-lane motorway Ring Route. This is a 48km motorway link from to connect State Highways 20 (the Manukau in the south to Albany in the north that Southwestern Motorway) and 16 (the WHO WILL OPERATE will bypass central Auckland. Northwestern Motorway). THE MOTORWAY? Completing the Western Ring Route has been There will be three lanes southbound and prioritised as a Road of National Significance three lanes northbound between Maioro The Well-Connected Alliance, which is building because of the contribution it will make to New Street, where S.H.20 now ends, and the the Waterview Connection, will form an alliance Zealand’s future prosperity. It will provide Auckland Great North Road interchange on S.H.16. with international tunnel controls specialists SICE NZ Ltd (Sociedad Ibérica de Construcciones with a resilient and reliable motorway network by Half of the new motorway is underground in Eléctricas) to operate and maintain the motorway reducing the region’s dependence on the single twin tunnels 2.4km long and up to 30m below for the first 10 years of its life. A team from SICE spine comprising State Highway 1 and the Auckland the surface between the Alan Wood Reserve has worked with the Well-Connected Alliance Harbour Bridge for business to business trips, in Owairaka and Waterview.
  • Rail Network Investment Programme

    Rail Network Investment Programme

    RAIL NETWORK INVESTMENT PROGRAMME JUNE 2021 Cover: Renewing aged rail and turnouts is part of maintaining the network. This page: Upgrade work on the commuter networks is an important part of the investment programme. 2 | RAIL NETWORK INVESTMENT PROGRAMME CONTENTS 1. Foreword 4 2. Introduction and approval 5 • Rail Network Investment Programme at a glance 3. Strategic context 8 4. The national rail network today 12 5. Planning and prioritising investment 18 6. Investment – national freight and tourism network 24 7. Investment – Auckland and Wellington metro 40 8. Other investments 48 9. Delivering on this programme 50 10. Measuring success 52 11. Investment programme schedules 56 RAIL NETWORK INVESTMENT PROGRAMME | 3 1. FOREWORD KiwiRail is pleased to present this This new investment approach marks a turning point that is crucial to securing the future of rail and unlocking its inaugural Rail Network Investment full potential. Programme. KiwiRail now has certainty about the projected role of rail Rail in New Zealand is on the cusp of in New Zealand’s future, and a commitment to provide an exciting new era. the funding needed to support that role. Rail has an increasingly important role to play in the This Rail Network Investment Programme (RNIP) sets out transport sector, helping commuters and products get the tranches of work to ensure the country has a reliable, where they need to go – in particular, linking workers resilient and safe rail network. with their workplaces in New Zealand’s biggest cities, and KiwiRail is excited about taking the next steps towards connecting the nation’s exporters to the world.
  • Bay of Plenty Region Passenger and Freight Rail FINAL Report May 2019

    Bay of Plenty Region Passenger and Freight Rail FINAL Report May 2019

    1 | P a g e Bay of Plenty Passenger and Freight Rail Phase 1 Investigation Report May 2019 Contents Page Contents Page ......................................................................................................................................... 2 1.0 Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 4 2.0 Overall Findings and Future Opportunities ................................................................................. 6 2.1 Overall Findings ....................................................................................................................... 6 2.2 Future Opportunities ............................................................................................................ 10 3.0 Bay of Plenty Passenger and Freight Rail Investigation 2019 ................................................... 13 3.1 Phase 1 Investigation ............................................................................................................ 13 3.2 Stakeholders / Partners ........................................................................................................ 13 3.3 New Zealand Transport Agency Business Case Approach .................................................... 14 3.4 Bay of Plenty Rail Strategy 2007 ........................................................................................... 14 4.0 National Strategy and Policy Settings ......................................................................................
  • St Lukes Interchange (St Lukes Interchange) to Be Shown As Road Purposes for the Project (St Lukes Interchange)

    St Lukes Interchange (St Lukes Interchange) to Be Shown As Road Purposes for the Project (St Lukes Interchange)

    6 Henderson Valley Road, Henderson, Auckland 0612 Private Bag 92250, Auckland 1142, New Zealand Ph 09 355 3553 Fax 09 355 3550 Notice of Requirement NOTICE OF REQUIREMENT FOR A DESIGNATION UNDER SECTION 168(2) OF THE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ACT 1991 (RMA) TO: Auckland Council FROM: Auckland Transport 6 Henderson Valley Road Henderson Private Bag 92250 Auckland AUCKLAND TRANSPORT (an Auckland Council Controlled Organisation) as Requiring Authority under section 167 of the Resource Management Act 1991 gives notice of a requirement for a designation in the Auckland Council District Plan for works being the Waterview Connection SH16 St Lukes Interchange (St Lukes Interchange) to be shown as road purposes for the Project (St Lukes Interchange). 1. SUMMARY The St Lukes Interchange will generally comprise: Auckland Transport gives notice of a requirement for an alteration to “Designations D05- 08 and B08-04” in the Auckland Council District Plan (Isthmus Section) 2011 (“District Plan”) to widen St Lukes Road and Great North Road at the St Lukes Interchange. The purpose of Designation D05-08 is for regional road and the purpose of designation B08-04 is for public road network. The designations are identified on District Plan Maps D05 and D06 and in Appendix B of the Planning Maps, copies of which are contained in Appendix A this NoR. Under Section 176A(2)(b) of the RMA it is not intended to submit an Outline Plan of Works prior to construction as the details of the proposed works, as referred to in Section 176A(3), are addressed in this NOR. The proposed works are in keeping with the purpose of designations D05-08 and B08-04.
  • Video Questions and Answers

    Video Questions and Answers

    Page 1 of 2 Waterview Connection Video Answers Tuesday 26 August 1. Meeting Auckland’s Roading Needs Drive down to the waterfront in the centre of Auckland City and meet Peter Spies from NZTA to find out more about Auckland’s road network. 1. Why are good roads important? They allow people, goods and services to travel easily and efficiently to help the economy 2. What are some of the challenges in providing good roads in Auckland? two harbours, volcanoes and an increasing population 3. What happens if there is an accident on the Harbour Bridge? There are very long delays as it shuts the main route through Auckland. Next step learning: Find out more about the State Highways in your local area and how they have changed over time. 2. The Western Ring – An Alternative Route Find out more about the Auckland Harbour Bridge and discover why Auckland needs the Western Ring Route. 1. How long was it expected to take to complete the Western Ring Route? 15 years 2. What were some of the major projects involved in closing up the gaps in the Western Ring Route? Manukau Extension, the Mount Roskill Project, Manukau Harbour Crossing, Hobsinville Extension 3. Why is the Harbour Bridge not enough to meet transport needs? It cannot be extended, the clip-ons have a limited life and will need replacing Next step learning: Discuss how you think the Western Ring Route will impact on Auckland and how it might affect you. LEARNZ Waterview Connection Field Trip to Auckland – Term 3, 2014 Log in to http://www.learnz.org.nz/waterviewconnection143 Page 2 of 2 3.
  • Before a Board of Inquiry East West Link Proposal

    Before a Board of Inquiry East West Link Proposal

    BEFORE A BOARD OF INQUIRY EAST WEST LINK PROPOSAL Under the Resource Management Act 1991 In the matter of a Board of Inquiry appointed under s149J of the Resource Management Act 1991 to consider notices of requirement and applications for resource consent made by the New Zealand Transport Agency in relation to the East West Link roading proposal in Auckland Statement of Evidence in Chief of Anthony David Cross on behalf of Auckland Transport dated 10 May 2017 BARRISTERS AND SOLICITORS A J L BEATSON SOLICITOR FOR THE SUBMITTER AUCKLAND LEVEL 22, VERO CENTRE, 48 SHORTLAND STREET PO BOX 4199, AUCKLAND 1140, DX CP20509, NEW ZEALAND TEL 64 9 916 8800 FAX 64 9 916 8801 EMAIL [email protected] Introduction 1. My full name is Anthony David Cross. I currently hold the position of Network Development Manager in the AT Metro (public transport) division of Auckland Transport (AT). 2. I hold a Bachelor of Regional Planning degree from Massey University. 3. I have 31 years’ experience in public transport planning. I worked at Wellington Regional Council between 1986 and 2006, and the Auckland Regional Transport Authority between 2006 and 2010. I have held my current role since AT was established in 2010. 4. In this role, I am responsible for specifying the routes and service levels (timetables) for all of Auckland’s bus services. Since 2012, I have led the AT project known as the New Network, which by the end of 2018 will result in a completely restructured network of simple, connected and more frequent bus routes across all of Auckland.
  • Burglars on Bikes Roam Suburbs

    Burglars on Bikes Roam Suburbs

    Can the CAB hold its Dr Libby's ground? P12 health tips P31 CourierEast & Bays Your Place, Your Paper Wednesday, September 7, 2016 Pai and Piri drop into Auckland Library Highly-trained pest-detection dogs Pai and Piri, and their handlers Carol and Fin, will be at Auckland Central Library on September 10, 1pm-2pm to tell you about the amazing work they do for Conservation Work. Pai and Piri are a brother and sister team who work for the Department of Conservation. With their handlers, they help keep islands in the Hauraki Gulf pest-free to protect native species like the takahe, stichbird, tui and kereru. Burglars on bikes roam suburbs ELESHA EDMONDS Auckland, particularly in St ‘‘It's definitely a trend and obviously Police are also looking for the Heliers, Kohimarama and owners of stolen property Burglars are believed to be using Mission Bay areas, as well as Mt police are concerned.’’ recovered during a police oper- bikes as getaway vehicles after Wellington and Onehunga. Inspector Andy King ation in Auckland at the end of stealing from houses and cars in ‘‘It’s not a new thing but it’s August. east Auckland. definitely a trend and obviously land during July 2016 which was King says cars broken into The property includes watches Police are warning residents to police are concerned.’’ nearly unchanged from 174 at the while parked in driveways are and jewellery, including a num- contact them if they see King says the offenders are same time last year. now included in the statistics as ber of wedding rings and gold suspicious-looking bike riders taking any property they can find However, according to the burglaries.
  • 10 Minute Frequency in the Peak) in Both Directions

    10 Minute Frequency in the Peak) in Both Directions

    Operational plan for this week Western Line Western Line services will operate to the normal schedule (10 minute frequency in the peak) in both directions. These services will operate through Newmarket train station as normal. Eastern Line Eastern Line services will operate to the normal schedule (10 minute frequency in the peak) in both directions. Southern Line Southern Line services will operate to a reduced frequency (20 minute frequency). Services towards Britomart will operate through Newmarket stopping all stations. Services from Britomart towards Papakura will continue to be cancelled between Britomart and Otahuhu (not servicing the following stations: Parnell, Newmarket, Remuera, Greenlane, Ellerslie, and Penrose) and will run via Panmure on the Eastern Line. Then as normal on the Southern Line from Otahuhu to Papakura. Newmarket Station to Britomart, use the Western Line Parnell Station to Britomart, use the Western Line Remuera Station to Britomart, use bus route 70 from 77 Great South Road (4 minute walk from station) to 32 Customs Street East Greenlane Station to Britomart, use bus route 70 from 197 Great South Road (7 minute walk from station) to 32 Customs Street East Ellerslie Station to Britomart, use bus route 70 from 53 Main Highway (2 minute walk from station) to 32 Customers Street East Penrose Station to Britomart, use Onehunga Line to Penrose, then transfer to Rail Shuttle to Otahuhu, then use Eastern/Southern Line to Britomart Onehunga Line Onehunga Line services will remain cancelled between Britomart and Penrose in both directions (not servicing the following stations: Britomart, Parnell , Newmarket, Remuera, Greenlane, and Ellerslie) and will operate as a shuttle between Onehunga & Penrose.
  • Rail Electrification and Extension from Papakura to Pukekohe Updates Glossary

    Rail Electrification and Extension from Papakura to Pukekohe Updates Glossary

    Agenda Item 13 (iv) Rail Electrification and Extension from Papakura to Pukekohe Updates Glossary Auckland Council (AC) Auckland Electrified Area (AEA) Auckland Plan (AP) Auckland Transport (AT) Construcciones y Auxiliar de Ferrocarriles (CAF) Diesel Multiple Unit (DMU) Electric Multiple Unit (EMU) KiwiRail Group (KRG) New Zealand Transport Agency (NZTA) North Auckland Line (NAL) North Island Main Trunk Line (NIMT) Onehunga Branch Line (OBL) Regional Land Transport Programme (RLTP) Rapid Transit Network (RTN) Executive Summary Item 1: Auckland Rail Electrification Update AT and KRG are currently undertaking preparatory works for electrification of the Auckland Rail Network between Papakura and Swanson Stations, with the first EMU services being tested and commissioned from September 2013. The target is for EMU passenger services to be introduced from December 2013, initially on the OBL. The remainder of the EMU fleet will be introduced in stages until the full fleet is in service under current programme timelines in mid-2016. The electrification projects can be grouped as follows: a) Installation and commissioning of electrification infrastructure: overhead wires, gantries, earthing of stations, etc., primary responsibility with KRG. b) Station and depot infrastructure: preparation for electrification includes construction of an EMU depot at Wiri, upgrading of a number of existing stations to a common standard, construction of a new station at Parnell, ensuring sufficient stabling for the EMU fleet. Responsibility is primarily with AT; c) Procurement of new EMU fleet: Including operational transitioning from the existing DMU and diesel locomotives to the new EMUs. Responsibility rests with AT. d) Operational readiness for electrification: Training of staff, train drivers and contractors for working within an electrified environment, agreement on responsibility for maintaining electrification assets, agreement on safety provisions for public and contractors, communications with the public and other stakeholders.
  • Draft Area Plan Hibiscus and Bays

    Draft Area Plan Hibiscus and Bays

    Draft Area Plan Hibiscus and Bays October / November 2012 Draft for public engagement: 23 October to 23 November 2012 1 DRAFT HIBISCUS AND BAYS AREA PLAN Table of contents Hibiscus and Bays vision 3 What are Area Plans? 4 The relationship between Area Plans and other plans 5 The role and purpose of the Area Plan 6 Community Engagement in the Draft Hibiscus and Bays Area Plan 7 Setting the strategic context: Auckland-wide 8 What does the Auckland Plan mean for the Hibiscus and Bays Area Plan? 9 Setting the local context: Hibiscus and Bays Local Board area 10 Future challenges and opportunities for Hibiscus and Bays Local area 11 Hibiscus and Bays outcomes and actions 13 Hibiscus and Bays key moves 14 Area Plan Framework Map 2042 16 Hibiscus and Bays Town Centres, Local Centres and Neighbourhood Centres 26 Coastal Villages 32 Natural, Heritage and Character Outcomes 34 Economic and Community Development Outcomes 42 Transport and Network Infrastructure Outcomes 50 Implementation and prioritisation plan 58 Key Priorities 59 10 year prioritisation schedule 62 Glossary 68 Disclaimer: Auckland Council is not liable for anyone or any entity acting in reliance of this area plan or for any error, defi ciency or omission in it. Front cover image: Long Bay Regional Park looking south towards urban Auckland. Inside cover: Ōrewa Town Centre from Red Beach. 2 Hibiscus and Bays vision The Draft Hibiscus and Bays Area Plan provides a vision for how the Hibiscus and Bays Local Board area could change over the next 30 years. It outlines the steps to “Hibiscus and Bays - values achieve this vision and how the Hibiscus and Bays Local Board area will contribute to Auckland becoming the our beaches and coastal world’s most liveable city.
  • Auckland Unitary Plan Operative in Part 1 6300 North Auckland Railway Line

    Auckland Unitary Plan Operative in Part 1 6300 North Auckland Railway Line

    Designation Schedule – KiwiRail Holdings Ltd Number Purpose Location 6300 Develop, operate and maintain railways, railway lines, North Auckland Railway Line from Portage railway infrastructure, and railway premises ... Road, Otahuhu to Ross Road, Topuni 6301 Develop, operate and maintain railways, railway lines, Newmarket Branch Railway Line from Remuera railway infrastructure, and railway premises ... Road, Newmarket to The Strand, Parnell 6302 Develop, operate and maintain railways, railway lines, North Island Main Trunk Railway Line railway infrastructure, and railway premises ... from Buckland to Britomart Station, Auckland Central 6303 Develop, operate and maintain railways, railway lines, Avondale Southdown Railway Line from Soljak railway infrastructure, and railway premises ... Place, Mount Albert to Bond Place, Onehunga 6304 Develop, operate and maintain railways, railway lines, Onehunga Branch Railway Line railway infrastructure, and railway premises from Onehunga Harbour Road, Onehunga to ... Station Road, Penrose and Neilson Street, Tepapa 6305 Develop, operate and maintain railways, railway lines, Southdown Freight Terminal at Neilson Street railway infrastructure, and railway premises ... (adjoins No. 345), Onehunga 6306 Develop, operate and maintain railways, railway lines, Mission Bush Branch Railway Line railway infrastructure, and railway premises ... from Mission Bush Road, Glenbrook to Paerata Road, Pukekohe 6307 Develop, operate and maintain railways, railway lines, Manukau Rail Link from Lambie Drive (off- railway
  • Released Under the Official Information

    Released Under the Official Information

    Attachment E crassi RELEASED UNDER THE OFFICIALNZ Transport INFORMATION Agency and Auckland ACT Transport East West Connections Project Ecological Assessment to Support Option Selection November 2014 RELEASED UNDER THE OFFICIAL INFORMATION ACT GHD | Report for NZ Transport Agency and Auckland Transport - East West Connections Project, 51/326513/202 | i Table of contents 1. Introduction..................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Project Description ............................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Limitations ............................................................................................................................ 4 1.3 Assumptions ........................................................................................................................ 5 2. Assessment Methodology .............................................................................................................. 6 3. Background Information - Existing Environment ............................................................................ 7 4. Key Design Assumptions ............................................................................................................... 8 5. Assessment of Options ................................................................................................................ 10 5.1 Potential Environmental Effects ........................................................................................