DOCSLIB.ORG

Draft Area Plan Hibiscus and Bays

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Draft Area Plan Hibiscus and Bays Draft Area Plan Hibiscus and Bays October / November 2012 Draft for public engagement: 23 October to 23 November 2012 1 DRAFT HIBISCUS AND BAYS AREA PLAN Table of contents Hibiscus and Bays vision 3 What are Area Plans? 4 The relationship between Area Plans and other plans 5 The role and purpose of the Area Plan 6 Community Engagement in the Draft Hibiscus and Bays Area Plan 7 Setting the strategic context: Auckland-wide 8 What does the Auckland Plan mean for the Hibiscus and Bays Area Plan? 9 Setting the local context: Hibiscus and Bays Local Board area 10 Future challenges and opportunities for Hibiscus and Bays Local area 11 Hibiscus and Bays outcomes and actions 13 Hibiscus and Bays key moves 14 Area Plan Framework Map 2042 16 Hibiscus and Bays Town Centres, Local Centres and Neighbourhood Centres 26 Coastal Villages 32 Natural, Heritage and Character Outcomes 34 Economic and Community Development Outcomes 42 Transport and Network Infrastructure Outcomes 50 Implementation and prioritisation plan 58 Key Priorities 59 10 year prioritisation schedule 62 Glossary 68 Disclaimer: Auckland Council is not liable for anyone or any entity acting in reliance of this area plan or for any error, defi ciency or omission in it. Front cover image: Long Bay Regional Park looking south towards urban Auckland. Inside cover: Ōrewa Town Centre from Red Beach. 2 Hibiscus and Bays vision The Draft Hibiscus and Bays Area Plan provides a vision for how the Hibiscus and Bays Local Board area could change over the next 30 years. It outlines the steps to “Hibiscus and Bays - values achieve this vision and how the Hibiscus and Bays Local Board area will contribute to Auckland becoming the our beaches and coastal world’s most liveable city. This Draft Area Plan will incorporate the aspirations and context, landscapes, way of goals of the community, key stakeholders and Mana Whenua, while addressing the growth projections set out life and people”. in the Auckland Plan. Many of the issues, aspirations, Vision from Hibiscus and Bays Local Board Plan, Page 2. and opportunities for the Hibiscus and Bays area are not new. There are six key transformational shifts for the Hibiscus and Bays Local Board area: How to be involved • Establish the ‘North-West Wildlink’ as a continuous greenbelt, complemented by This is a draft plan. Your input is important to us and we improved quality of the adjoining estuarine and want to hear your views and comments. marine environment This is your opportunity to contribute to the future • Grow the green economy and ecotourism direction of the Hibiscus and Bays area by letting us potential of Hibiscus and Bays by leveraging off know what you like, dislike and think we may have the area’s natural assets forgotten. All feedback will be considered when developing the fi nal Hibiscus and Bays Area Plan. • Build a continuous coastal pathway to connect Hibiscus and Bays’ communities We invite you to have your say. You can give us feedback by post, email, or on our website. • Focus growth in centres, and in areas with high amenity and good access to public transport By post: • Improve transport connections throughout Freepost Authority 241331 the area by extending the Northern Busway, Hibiscus and Bays Area Plan implementing Penlink and associated works, and by promoting potential, new water-based Auckland Council transport. Private Bag 92300 • Develop employment land in and around Victoria Street West Silverdale to increase employment Auckland 1142 opportunities for local people. By email: [email protected] The objective of the Draft Hibiscus and Bays Area Plan is to provide greater choices of where and how people will By website: www.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/areaplans live, work and play in the Hibiscus and Bays Local Board area. Future development must respond to the needs of the diverse ethnic and youthful community in the area, To see or download the Draft Hibiscus and Bays Area including providing access to employment opportunities Plan and feedback form visit the Council’s website at and a wider range of housing options. www.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/areaplans The delivery of area plan outcomes in a 30-year Hard copies will also be available from local timeframe will require a collaborative approach between libraries, the Hibiscus and Bays Local Board offi ce, the community, Mana Whenua and key delivery and on request by phoning (09) 301 0101 or partners including Auckland Council, council controlled emailing [email protected] organisations (CCOs), central government agencies and We will also be active in the Hibiscus and Bays Local private land owners. Board area from 23 October to 23 November 2012. Investment in physical and social infrastructure including You will fi nd information about the events on our transport, open space, community facilities, and website and displayed in local libraries. schools, is needed to meet the growth in business and All feedback must be received by 5.00pm on Friday 23 population. But such investment must be balanced with November 2012. protecting the highly valued and sensitive features of the area. Initiatives in this Draft Hibiscus and Bays Area Plan recognise and build on the area’s cultural and historical values, and its highly valued landscapes. 3 DRAFT HIBISCUS AND BAYS AREA PLAN What are Area Plans? An area plan is a key tool in Auckland Council’s Auckland Council will develop 21 area plans, each strategic planning framework (see Figures 1 and 2 focused at the local board level. Once complete, each below). The purpose of an area plan is to show how the plan will ‘seamlessly integrate’ with the other area plans Auckland Plan (its outcomes, proposed changes and and will form a single picture of Auckland. strategic directions) will be put in place at the local The outcomes and aspirations set out in an area plan level. An area plan uses tools such as the Unitary Plan, include those that Council and its various departments local board plans, the Long Term Plan and emerging may deliver and those that will be undertaken by Council Council strategies to help deliver the Auckland plan’s Controlled Organisations (CCOs). They also include objectives. An area plan prioritises those future activities outcomes and aspirations that might be achieved and projects for an area that are required to achieve by infl uencing the activities of, and/or forming close Auckland’s Vision of creating “the world’s most liveable partnerships with, other parties such as government city”. agencies, private landowners and community Each area plan shows, in maps and words, the 30-year organisations. Developing an area plan should resolve vision for an area. Key parts of an area plan include differences between local aspirations and Auckland Plan the proposed land-uses (shown in the area plan objectives. Then the plan can focus on other processes, framework map page 16), and the important economic, such as the need for more detailed planning in the future environmental, social and cultural outcomes and and the need for key infrastructure (including social initiatives (as shown in three theme maps). The result facilities) to support these aims. is an integrated vision of how an area could look and function in the future. Figure 1: Auckland Council’s Strategic Planning Framework Source: The Auckland Plan 2012 4 The relationship between area plans and other plans Local Board Plans The Unitary Plan Local board plans provide community-level vision, and Council is developing Auckland’s fi rst Unitary Plan to priorities and projects for each local board. Each of the replace the district and regional plans and policies of 21 local boards in Auckland has a local board plan and the former city, district and regional councils. Prepared an annual agreement with the governing body. These under the Resource Management Act (1991), the Unitary agreements set out how much funding is available for Plan is Council’s main land-use planning document. Its local board projects in each area. objectives, policies and rules will help implement the Auckland Plan. The Unitary Plan will also have regulatory The Hibiscus and Bays Local Board Plan has played a key provisions that achieve the area plan outcomes. role in helping to identify area plan priorities, projects It will not be possible for all area plans to be completed and community aspirations. This plan sets out the vision across Auckland before the Unitary Plan is fi rst publicly and priorities for the Local Board area. The Local Board notifi ed. However, area plan outputs and analysis will be and the community have identifi ed projects and these introduced into the draft Unitary Plan over time when are included in this area plan. Local board plans must be and as each area plan is completed. The area plans will reviewed every three years. inform the Unitary Plan by outlining a range of land uses under the broad categories of living, business, mixed use, rural, open space and special purpose. The three YOUR VOICE area plan theme maps will identify local values and/or FOR YOUR features. The policies and rules used in the Unitary Plan COMMUNITY will reinforce these. The Unitary Plan is one tool to help implement the area plan. Figure 2: Three levels of planning Rural Hauraki Gulf production Browns Region-wide planning Bay Country Albany living ? Riverhead Sunnynook (The Auckland Plan) Milford Glenfield Public Takapuna open space ? ? Northcote Westgate / Massey North Highbury City Centre Waitematā ntry & Fringe Te Atatu Harbour ng Peninsula Newmarket Pt Chevalier Henderson Glen Bush St Lukes Remuera Innes living Mt Albert Avondale Three Ellerslie Howick Panmure Kings Glen New Lynn Highland Eden Royal Sylvia Park Cover of Hibiscus and Bays Local Board Plan.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Regional Assessment of Areas Susceptible to Coastal Erosion Volume 2: Appendices a - J February TR 2009/009
    Regional Assessment of Areas Susceptible to Coastal Erosion Volume 2: Appendices A - J February TR 2009/009 Auckland Regional Council Technical Report No. 009 February 2009 ISSN 1179-0504 (Print) ISSN 1179-0512 (Online) ISBN 978-1-877528-16-3 Contents Appendix A: Consultants Brief Appendix B: Peer reviewer’s comments Appendix C: Summary of Relevant Tonkin & Taylor Jobs Appendix D: Summary of Shoreline Characterization Appendix E: Field Investigation Data Appendix F: Summary of Regional Beach Properties Appendix G: Summary of Regional Cliff Properties Appendix H: Description of Physical Setting Appendix I: Heli-Survey DVDs (Contact ARC Librarian) Appendix J: Analysis of Beach Profile Changes Regional Assessment of Areas Susceptible to Coastal Erosion, Volume 2: Appendices A-J Appendix A: Consultants Brief Appendix B: Peer reviewer’s comments Appendix C: Summary of relevant Tonkin & Taylor jobs Job Number North East Year of Weathered Depth is Weathered Typical Cliff Cliff Slope Cliff Slope Composite Composite Final Slope Geology Rec Setback erosion rate Comments Street address Suburb investigation layer depth Estimated/ layer Slope weathered layer Height (deg) (rads) slope from slope from (degree) from Crest (m) (m/yr) (m) Greater than (deg) slope (rad) (m) calc (degree) profile (deg) 6 RIVERVIEW PANMURE 12531.000 2676066 6475685 1994 2.40 58 0.454 12.0 51.5 0.899 43.70 35 35 avt 6 ROAD 15590.000 6472865 2675315 2001 2.40 0.454 4.0 30.0 0.524 27.48 27 avt 8 29 MATAROA RD OTAHUHU 16619.000 6475823 2675659 1999 2.40 0.454 6.0 50.0 0.873 37.07 37 avt LAGOON DRIVE PANMURE long term recession ~ FIDELIS AVENUE 5890.000 2665773 6529758 1983 0.75 G 0.454 0.000 N.D Kk 15 - 20 0.050 50mm/yr 80m setback from toe FIDELIS AVE ALGIES BAY recc.
    [Show full text]
  • Auckland Trail Notes Contents
    22 October 2020 Auckland trail notes Contents • Mangawhai to Pakiri • Mt Tamahunga (Te Hikoi O Te Kiri) Track • Govan Wilson to Puhoi Valley • Puhoi Track • Puhoi to Wenderholm by kayak • Puhoi to Wenderholm by walk • Wenderholm to Stillwater • Okura to Long Bay • North Shore Coastal Walk • Coast to Coast Walkway • Onehunga to Puhinui • Puhinui Stream Track • Totara Park to Mangatawhiri River • Hunua Ranges • Mangatawhiri to Mercer Mangawhai to Pakiri Route From Mangawhai Heads carpark, follow the road to the walkway by 44 Wintle Street which leads down to the estuary. Follow the estuary past a camping ground, a boat ramp & holiday baches until wooden steps lead up to the Findlay Street walkway. From Findlay Street, head left into Molesworth Drive until reaching Mangawhai Village. Then a right into Moir Street, left into Insley Street and across the estuary then left into Black Swamp Road. Follow this road until reaching Pacific Road which leads you through a forestry block to the beach and the next stage of Te Araroa. Bypass Note: You could obtain a boat ride across the estuary to the Mangawhai Spit to avoid the road walking section. Care of sand-nesting birds is required on this Scientific Wildlife Reserve - please stick to the shoreline. Just 1km south, a stream cuts across the beach and it can go over thigh height, as can other water crossings on this track. Follow the coast southwards for another 2km, then take the 1 track over Te Ārai Point. Once back on the beach, continue south for 12km (fording Poutawa Stream on the way) until you cross the Pākiri River then head inland to reach the end of Pākiri River Road.
    [Show full text]
  • North Shore Heritage Thematic Review Report
    North Shore Heritage Thematic Review Report 1 July 2011 TR2011/010 North Shore Heritage Volume 1 A Thematic History of the North Shore TR2011/010 Auckland Council TR2011/010, 1 July 2011 ISSN 2230-4525 (Print) ISSN 2230-4533 (Online) Volume 1 ISBN 978-1-927169-20-9 (Print) ISBN 978-1-927169-21-6 (PDF) Volume 2 ISBN 978-1-927169-22-3 (Print) ISBN 978-1-927169-23-0 (PDF) 2-volume set ISBN 978-1-927169-24-7 (Print) ISBN 978-1-927169-25-4 (PDF) Reviewed by: Approved for AC Publication by: Name: Leslie Vyfhuis Name: Noel Reardon Position: Principal Specialist, Built Heritage Position: Manager, Heritage Organisation: Auckland Council Organisation: Auckland Council Date: 1 July 2011 Date: 1 July 2011 Recommended Citation: North Shore Heritage - Thematic Review Report. Compiled by Heritage Consultancy Services for Auckland Council. 1 July 2011. Auckland Council Document TR 2011/010. © 2011 Auckland Council This publication is provided strictly subject to Auckland Council's (AC) copyright and other intellectual property rights (if any) in the publication. Users of the publication may only access, reproduce and use the publication, in a secure digital medium or hard copy, for responsible genuine non-commercial purposes relating to personal, public service or educational purposes, provided that the publication is only ever accurately reproduced and proper attribution of its source, publication date and authorship is attached to any use or reproduction. This publication must not be used in any way for any commercial purpose without the prior written consent of AC. AC does not give any warranty whatsoever, including without limitation, as to the availability, accuracy, completeness, currency or reliability of the information or data (including third party data) made available via the publication and expressly disclaim (to the maximum extent permitted in law) all liability for any damage or loss resulting from your use of, or reliance on the publication or the information and data provided via the publication.
    [Show full text]
  • Housing Assessment for the Auckland Region Mario A
    Housing Assessment for the Auckland Region Mario A. Fernandez, Chad Hu Jennifer L. R. Joynt, Shane L. Martin, Isobel Jennings July 2021 Housing assessment for the Auckland region Mario A Fernandez Chad Hu With Jennifer L R Joynt Shane L Martin Isobel Jennings July 2021 Auckland Council National Policy Statement on Urban Development 2020 ISBN 978-1-99-100246-4 (Print) ISBN 978-1-99-100247-1 (PDF) This report has been peer reviewed by the Peer Review Panel. Review completed on 28 July 2021. Approved for Auckland Council publication by: Name: Megan Tyler Position: Chief of Strategy Name: Jacques Victor Position: Manager, Auckland Plan, Strategy and Research Department Name: Eva McLaren Position: Manager, Research and Evaluation Unit, RIMU Date: 30 July 2021 Recommended citation Fernandez, M. A., C. Hu, J. L. R. Joynt, S. L. Martin and I. Jennings (2021). Housing assessment for the Auckland region Endorsed by the Auckland Council Planning Committee, July 2021. Cover image credit: Apartment buildings, Stonefields, Mt Wellington, Auckland. Photograph by Jay Farnworth. © 2021 Auckland Council Auckland Council disclaims any liability whatsoever in connection with any action taken in reliance of this document for any error, deficiency, flaw, or omission contained in it. This document is licensed for re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence. In summary, you are free to copy, distribute and adapt the material, as long as you attribute it to the Auckland Council and abide by the other licence terms. Acknowledgements Auckland Council Spatial Analysis and Modelling Team Mike Oberdries, Oberdries Consulting Ltd With special thanks to: Chloe Trenouth, Director, Hill Young Cooper Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • Asset Management Plan 2018 – 2038 Watercare Services Limited 1 | P a G E
    Foreword by the chief executive Our work is vital for life, keeps people safe, and helps communities to flourish. Delivering 100% Aa-grade water Watercare delivers 100% Aa-grade water, day in, day out, to Auckland. Drinking water appears. Wastewater disappears. We are leading the water utility of a major city – Auckland – at a time when, globally, the use of the planet’s water resource is in question. While water is not as scarce for us here as it is in other countries, across New Zealand there is now a growing discussion about the use of water for industry and the quality of water in our rural and urban waterways. Water treatment in towns and cities is under scrutiny also, following a serious drinking water supply incident in Havelock North. This event was linked to four deaths and thousands of sick people and prompted an in-depth government inquiry into the delivery of water services nationally. So, questions are being asked about water use and the steps that need to be taken to make improvements for the sake of the environment, our economy and our community. Public consciousness of the value of water seems to be growing – and with it the material importance to our stakeholders of all that is within Watercare’s remit. Enabling growth Here in Auckland, where the population is well served with high-quality water services, the discussion about water is focused on the city’s rapidly-growing population. Water demand is forecast to outstrip current supply within 10 years, prompting planned additions to our existing water supplies.
    [Show full text]
  • 12 September 2016 Principal's Awards Class Placements for 2017
    Principal’s Awards COMING UP Congratulations to the following children who received Principal’s Awards at MON 12 SEPTEMBER assembly on Friday 9 September. Dental Therapists at CBS Aidan Lowe (Rm1), Jenna Kim (Rm 2), Sebastien Phillips-Smith (Rm 3), TUE 13 SEPTEMBER Jason Inglis (Rm 4), Mila Shan (Rm 5), Sebastien Leigh (Rm 6), Dental Therapists at Kaya Donnelly (Rm 10), Yoon Ho Maeng (Rm 11), Holly Yuan (Rm 12), CBS Skye Meldrum (Rm 13), Emma Molesworth (Rm 14), Matthew Chen (Rm 18), Plant to Taste Room 10 Interschool Cross Logan Mander (Rm 19), Lulu Gibbes (Rm 20), Ryan Russell (Rm 21), Country – selected Year Torunn Clarkson (Rm 22), Elyn Xu (Rm 23), Hunter Phelps (Rm 24), 4, 5 & 6 students Kyle Calubaquib (Rm 25), Joshua Shorter (Rm 26), Rio Mauger (Rm 26), WED 14 SEPTEMBER Celia Morris (Rm 27), Abdullah Adeel (Rm 36), Liam Crooks (Rm 37), Dental Therapists at CBS Stella Williamson (Rm 5O), Vincent Dall-Hjorring (Rm 5Y), Plant to Taste Room 22 Charlotte Penny (Rm 5B), Azhar Adam (Rm 5S), Alex Xu (Rm 5G), THU 15 SEPTEMBER Alex Beilby (Rm 6O), Cam McGlashan (Rm 6B), Ava Renford (Rm 6S), Dental Therapists at CBS Jack Li (Rm 6G). Waterwise Room 6O Save Day Interschool Cross Country Congratulations to Georgia Aitken from FRI 16 SEPTEMBER 6Orange, the recipient of the inaugural Dental Therapists at ‘Tony Ebert Kiwi Spirit’ Award. CBS MON 19 SEPTEMBER Dental Therapists at CBS TUE 20 SEPTEMBER Dental Therapists at CBS Plant to Taste Room 12 WED 21 SEPTEMBER Dental Therapists at Class Placements for 2017 CBS Plant to Taste Room 18 Important information regarding class placements for next year has gone home THU 22 SEPTEMBER with students today.
    [Show full text]
  • Schedule 8 Outstanding Natural Character
    Schedule 8 Outstanding Natural Character and High Natural Character Overlay Schedule Schedule 8 Outstanding Natural Character and High Natural Character Overlay Schedule [rcp/dp] Introduction The factors in B8.2.2(1) have been used to determine the areas that are included in Schedule 8 Outstanding Natural Character and High Natural Character Overlay Schedule and will be used to assess proposed future additions to the schedule. Auckland Unitary Plan Operative in part 1 Schedule 8 Outstanding Natural Character and High Natural Character Overlay Schedule Sche- Name Location Description Natural Character Values dule ID Okahukura Peninsula Bio-physical characteristics: 1 Manukapua Okahukura An extensive and outstanding assemblage of relatively Key Values Island & Peninsula, untouched intertidal sand banks, sand spits, wetlands that Geomorphological / landform features & characteristics Tapora Bank Tapora comprise Manukapua Island and Tapora Bank. The Islands punctuate the end of the Okahukura Peninsula and the Vegetation type, cover & patterns convergence of the Kaipara Harbour and its entrance into the Habitat / ecological values Tasman. The Islands have a very strong sense of naturalness, rawness, and wilderness which is highly Water bodies & the movement of water & sediment apparent along this remote coastal environment. Bio-physical values: Low .......................... High Perceptual Values: Key Values The wider coastal ‘context’ / setting Experiential attributes Perceptual Values: Low .......................... High Overall Natural Character Evaluation HIGH OUTSTANDING Bio-physical characteristics: 2 Tapora Bank Okahukura An extensive assemblage of intertidal sand banks, sand Key Values Peninsula, spits, intertidal flats, and wetlands that define the end of the Geomorphological / landform features & characteristics Tapora Okahukura Peninsula and the convergence of the Kaipara Harbour and its entrance into the Tasman.
    [Show full text]
  • Hatfields Beach 3 (Kauri Orewa Limited - ‘Chin Hill’ Precinct)
    BEFORE THE AUCKLAND UNITARY PLAN INDEPENDENT HEARINGS PANEL IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 and the Local Government (Auckland Transitional Provisions) Act 2010 AND IN THE MATTER of Topic 081b Rezoning and Precincts (Geographical areas) AND IN THE MATTER of the submissions and further submissions set out in the Parties and Issues Report STATEMENT OF REBUTTAL EVIDENCE OF NATHAN TE PAIRI ON BEHALF OF AUCKLAND COUNCIL Hatfields Beach 1 (Seaforth Ltd) Hatfields Beach 2 (Objective Holdings Limited) Hatfields Beach 3 (Kauri Orewa Limited - ‘Chin Hill’ precinct) 29 February 2015 1. SUMMARY 1.1 I have reviewed the submitters' evidence with regards to the proposed precincts being Hatfields Beach New 1, Hatfields Beach NEW 2 and Hatfields Beach NEW 3. 1.2 Having regard to that evidence, I maintain my position as stated in my evidence-in- chief (EIC) and do not support the inclusion of the proposed precincts into the PAUP. 2. INTRODUCTION 2.1 My name is Nathan Te Pairi. I have the qualifications and experience set out in my EIC dated 28 January 2016. 2.2 I confirm that this rebuttal statement of evidence has been prepared in accordance with the Code of Conduct for expert witnesses contained in the Environment Court Practice Note 2014. 3. SCOPE 3.1 This evidence should read alongside the rebuttal statements on behalf of the Council Stephen Brown - Landscape; Shona Myers - Ecology; Tim Segedin on behalf of Auckland Transport (AT) - Traffic Safety Andre Stuart of Watercare (WSL) – Infrastructure; and Carol Stewart: Parks and Recreation. 3.2 My EIC collectively responded to the submissions and commented on each of the proposed precincts where relevant.
    [Show full text]
  • The Genetic Analysis of Lasaea Hinemoa: the Story of an Evolutionary Oddity
    The Genetic Analysis of Lasaea hinemoa: The Story of an Evolutionary Oddity KATHERINE LOCKTON A thesis submitted for the degree of Master of Science at the University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand 1 March 2019 ABSTRACT Lasaea is a genus of molluscs that primarily consists of minute, hermaphroditic bivalves that occupy rocky shores worldwide. The majority of Lasaea species are asexual, polyploid, direct developers. However, two Australian species are exceptions: Lasaea australis is sexual, diploid and has planktotrophic development, whereas Lasaea colmani is sexual, diploid and direct developing. The New Zealand species Lasaea hinemoa has not been phylogeographically studied. I investigated the phylogeography of L. hinemoa using mitochondrial and nuclear gene sequencing (COIII and ITS2, respectively). Additionally, I investigated population- level structuring around Dunedin using microsatellite markers that I developed. It was elucidated that the individuals that underwent genetic investigation consisted of four clades (Clade I, Clade II, Clade III and Clade IV). Clade I and Clade III dominated in New Zealand and support was garnered through gene sequencing and microsatellite analysis for these clades to represent separate cryptic species, with biogeographic splitting present. Clade II consisted of individuals that had been collected from the Antipodes Island. The Antipodes Island contained individuals from two clades (Clade I and Clade II), with Lasaea from the Kerguelen Islands being more closely related to individuals from Clade II than Clade I was to Clade II. This genetic distinction between Clade I and Clade II seemed to indicate transoceanic dispersal via the Antarctic Circumpolar Current (ACC) between the Kerguelen Islands and Antipodes Island. Clade IV clustered very distinctly from L.
    [Show full text]
  • Auckland East Coast Subtidal Reef Marine Monitoring Programme: 2007 to 2013
    Auckland East Coast Subtidal Reef Marine Monitoring Programme: 2007 to 2013 January 2017 Technical Report 2017/002 Auckland East Coast Subtidal Reef Marine Monitoring Programme: 2007 to 2013 January 2017 Technical Report 2017/002 Auckland Council Technical Report 2017/002 ISSN 2230-4525 (Print) ISSN 2230-4533 (Online) ISBN 978-0-9941450-2-4 (Print) ISBN 978-0-9941450-3-1 (PDF) This report has been peer reviewed by the Peer Review Panel. Review submitted on 9 November 2016 Review completed on 23 January 2017 Reviewed by one reviewer Approved for Auckland Council publication by: Name: Dr Lucy Baragwanath Position: Manager, Research and Evaluation (RIMU) Name: Jacqueline Anthony Position: Manager, Environment Monitoring, Research and Evaluation (RIMU) Date: 23 January 2017 Recommended citation Shears, N (2017). Auckland east coast subtidal reef marine monitoring programme: 2007 to 2013. Prepared by the Leigh Marine Laboratory, Institute of Marine Science, University of Auckland for Auckland Council. Auckland Council technical report, TR2017/002 © 2017 Auckland Council This publication is provided strictly subject to Auckland Council’s copyright and other intellectual property rights (if any) in the publication. Users of the publication may only access, reproduce and use the publication, in a secure digital medium or hard copy, for responsible genuine non-commercial purposes relating to personal, public service or educational purposes, provided that the publication is only ever accurately reproduced and proper attribution of its source, publication date and authorship is attached to any use or reproduction. This publication must not be used in any way for any commercial purpose without the prior written consent of Auckland Council.
    [Show full text]
  • Opus Consultation and Community Engagement Report
    Appendix F Opus Consultation and Community Engagement Report Document No. NCI-1PRM-4COM-RPT-0103 Project No. 250310 This page has been intentionally left blank. Document No. NCI-1PRM-4COM-RPT-0103 Project No. 250310 Northern Corridor Improvements Project Stakeholder and Community Engagement Report September 2015 Northern Corridor Improvements Project Stakeholder and Community Engagement Report September 2015 Prepared By Tania Reynolds Opus International Consultants Ltd Community Engagement Specialist Auckland Environmental Office The Westhaven, 100 Beaumont St PO Box 5848, Auckland 1141 New Zealand Reviewed By Telephone: +64 9 355 9500 Rebekah Pokura-Ward Facsimile: +64 9 355 9584 Technical Principal Environmental Management Date: September 2015 Reference: 1-T0086.00 Status: Version 2 Approved for Release By Phil Harrison – Design Manager © Opus International Consultants Ltd 2015 Northern Corridor Improvements Project i Contents 1 Introduction ....................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Project Overview ............................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Project Objectives .............................................................................................................. 3 1.3 Project Timeframes ........................................................................................................... 4 2 Engagement Strategy.........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Sunnynook, Campbells Bay, Milford, Takapuna (PDF 926KB)
    Sunnynook Routes Fare Zones Campbells Bay 82 Milford, Takapuna, Wellesley St, City Centre (Mayoral Dr) & Boundaries 83 Massey University, Albany Station, Browns Bay, Mairangi Bay, Constellation Station, Smales Farm Station, Takapuna Wellsford Milford 842 Crown Hill, East Coast Rd, Shakespeare Rd, Smales Farm Station Omaha Matakana 843 Constellation Station, Sunnynook, East Coast Rd, Milford, Takapuna Smales Farm Station, Takapuna, Akoranga Station Warkworth 845 Milford, Nile Rd, North Shore Hospital, Smales Farm Station, Karaka St, Takapuna Warkworth Northern Bus Timetable 856 Albany Station, Torbay, Browns Bay, Beach Rd, Milford, Smales Farm Station, North Shore Hospital, Takapuna Waiwera Hibiscus Coast 871 Constellation Station, Forrest Hill Rd, Helensville Orewa Smales Farm Station, Takapuna Wainui Kaukapakapa Hibiscus Coast Gulf Harbour 82 907 Campbells Bay, Sunnynook Station, Target Rd, Waitoki Constellation Station Upper North Shore 83 Albany Waiheke Other timetables available in this area that may interest you Constellation Lower North Shore Riverhead Hauraki Gulf Takapuna Rangitoto Timetable Routes Island Huapai Westgate 842 801, 802, 805, 806, 807, 814, City Isthmus Devonport, Bayswater, Hauraki Waitemata Harbour Devonport Ferry, Bayswater Ferry Britomart Swanson Beachlands Long Bay, Torbay, Browns Bay, Kingsland Newmarket 83, 856, 861, 865, 878 Henderson 843 Mairangi Bay Waitakere Panmure New Lynn 97B, 97R, 97V, 917, 931, 933, 941, Waitakere Onehunga Beach Haven, Birkenhead 942, 966, Beach Haven Ferry, Ranges Otahuhu Botany 845
    [Show full text]