TRANSPORT COMMITTEE.20130807.Minutesattachments

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

TRANSPORT COMMITTEE.20130807.Minutesattachments AUCKLAND ELECTRIFICATON PROJECT UPDATE Nicholas French – Project Director Auckland Electrification – Elements Remaining Signalling System – Automatic Train Protection Traction – Infrastructure & Commissioning Operational Preparedness – Testing & Commissioning – Operations – Maintenance – Safety and Communications Signalling All of Auckland Network Operating on ‘Final State’ new Signalling Train Control operating on new Train Control System (R9000) Automatic Train Protection (()ETCS) Works – Trackside being delivered by KR as part of Signalling Contract – finished Nov 2013 – On-Board Train ETCS Equipment (Invensys provided) being delivered in conjunction with EMU Team. Installed in Spain – commissioned in NZ. – Trackside equipment being used to deliver Interim ATP system. Signalling Benefits New infrastructure proving to be reliable – 50% overall reduc tion in fault s from Feb 2012 Rail 9000 Operational since April 2012 – Au tomati c Rout e Setti ng – Automatic Train Graphing Bi-Directional Operation – Increased operational flexibility – Protection Systems – Lock Out Zones Automatic Train Protection (ETCS) – Delivered with the arrival of the new EMU’s – Interim system operating off ETCS trackside equipment. Traction System and Power Supply Foundations, Masts, overhead wires and power supply 25 kV AC overhead power. Both separate supply points commissioned Foundations 100% complete. 2785 masts out of 3825 installed. 355km out of 550km total – of OLE Wire (Earth, Catenary and Contact) installed. Auckland Electrified Area Traction and Power Supply - Cont Onehunga Branch Line Commissioned Westfield to Wiri (complete) – commissioned BoL 7 / 8 September 2013 EMU Depot – commissioned 10 September Allows the testinggg and commissioning of the EMU’s to commence for the EMU roll-out Workinggy closely with AT and EMU team to ali gn deliver y programmes Traction – next steps Progressive commissioning of remaining sections through last quarter 2013 and first quarter 2014 Network infrastructure completion April 2014 Network fully commissioned May 2014 Electrical safety issues Bridge Screens installation 60% complete EhiEarthing and Bondi ng 90% complete Level Crossing barriers installed Signage and anti-climb guards installed. Operational Preparedness' Testing and Commissioning – Full testing a commissioning team mobilised to test and commission the network Operations – Traction Control operational – Procedures in place to manage an Electrified Network Maintenance – Contract negotiations underway with Preferred Tenderer to provide Maintenance of the OLE system Corridor Safety – Communications – Training Christmas Block of Line 2013-2014 Key BOL for achieving overall AEP programme Eastern Line NIMT OLE works Commission Manukau Branch Line Commissioning contingency QUESTIONS and DISCUSSION 5/09/2013 1 City Rail Link UpdateClick to edit Master title style Transport Committee 4 September 2013 2 2 Overview •ClickTimeline to edit Master title • CCFAS •style Government statement • Timing impacts • CRL progress 1 5/09/2013 CRL timeline 3 • EMUs begin service in April 2014 and are rolled out by end of 2015 Click to edit Master title style City Centre Future Access Study (CCFAS)4 The SKM study responded to a government request in July 2011 to develop a robust and achievable multi modal programme for access into the city centre 46 options identified and evaluated. Three shortlisted. Key objectives in developing options were to: Click• Provide for future to city centre edit growth and Master employment title • Support regional growth objectives • Deliver benefits for all transport users Underground Underground Integrated Criteriastyle Surface Bus Bus Rail (CRL) CRL and SB Effect on city centre access Worst Poor Better Best Impact on wider regional movement Improving economic performance & potential Reducing impacts on environment & amenity Implementation costs and difficulty Reduction in exposure to harm 2 5/09/2013 5 Government statement- 28 June 2013 . • Broadly agrees with CCFAS findings • Doesn’t agree CRL needed by 2021 • Instead is committed to: Click a joint bu siness to case w ithedit A uckland Co Master u ncil in 2017 title providing its share of funding for a construction start in 2020 style(so completion mid 2020s) • Prepared to consider an earlier start to business case if : city centre employment increases by 25 per cent over current levels (of 78,000 but did not sppyecify when) annual rail patronage is on track to hit 20 million trips well before 2020 (currently 10 million) and said that was something to discuss with council. Progressing city centre transport projects 6 Proposed CRL construction timing significantly affects the ability to deliver other important city centre projects Co-ordination of city centre construction works with the CRL construction is critical to ensureClick the road and trans toppport networks edit remain Master operational and functional. title Some of the key projects affected are: • Fanshawe/Customs St busway corridorstyle • Wellesley St bus corridor • City centre public transport/bus interchanges •Ferryyp basin redevelopment • Port to motorway connection • Quay St and seawall upgrade • Victoria St Linear Park 3 5/09/2013 Timing and construction implications 7 The CRL will create inner city disruption during cut and cover construction Albert St dug up progressively over two years, Aotea station estimated to be under construction for up to five years and major east west intersections closed for at least six months at a time AdverseClick effects will include: to edit Master title • reduced and altered business and property access • changed and limited vehicle and pedestrian movement •style noise and vibration While this can be well managed, timing is critical Forecast and potential city development and events: • In terna tiona l Conven tion Cen tre • Elliot Tower • Downtown Shopping Centre • 2015 Cricket World Cup • 2017 World Masters Games • America’s Cup? CRL - timing and long term gain 8 Click to edit Master title style • Leading growth with transport infrastructure is vital to city shaping 4 5/09/2013 Britomart- from seedy to sought after 9 10 years old - 40 million passengers- 24,000 a day • Britomart Precinct has the lowest vacancy rates and some of the highest lease rates in the city centre • Relocations attracted from the city centre, city fringe and outside Commercial Vacancy Rates Britomart Western ClickAll City Centre to editCore Master title Precinct Corridor 1995 14.6% 13.5% 17.5% 13.5% 2003 12.7% 14.9% 16.7% 8.6% 2011style 11.3% 1.3% 14.3% 8.8% Annual Average Employment Growth Source: Colliers International 2012 10.0% 8.0% 6.0% growth 4.0% 2.0% 0.0% Employee annual annual Employee 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 -2.0% Britomart images thanks to Cooper and Co -4.0% Britomart precinct Auckland except City Centre City Centre Why 2021? 10 By 2021: • Britomart has reached capacity at peak • ClickMjMajor btbus routes at to or over editcapacity Master title • Can lead development and shape city centre •style Intervene before problems get too bad After 2021: • Other options for city centre access exhausted • CRL becomes more “economically” efficient but only because major benefits achieved through travel time reduction so as congestion worsens, benefits increase. Wait for problems to worse. • Cost of delay is $100m a year 5 5/09/2013 CRL progress 11 Planning • Hearing adjourned until mid October to allow commissioners to consider the material PropertyClick to edit Master title • Two purchased, style• two in final stages, about 30 underway Design • Procurement process for reference Design 12 Click to edit Master title style 6 Transition to EMU Operations 2 EMU Delivery The first EMU arrived 24th August 2013: • Next 2 units in November 2013 • 2 units per month till unit number 30 in November 2014 • 4 units per month from December 2014 Testing EMUs to Provisional Handover (PH) • First 3 units have between 3 – 4 months prior to PH (dependent on successful tests) • Units 4 – 9 have approximately 2 months for carrying out tests • Remaining units have approximately 4 – 5 weeks for testing • All units to be delivered by July 2015 3 Transitional requirements for EMUs EMU Readiness • Testing and commissioning – both static and dynamic type testing • Routine testing – potentially staged approach due to current AEP Programme delivery • Potential for Reliability Growth Running • 2 – 3 EMUs required for training through till early 2015 • Maintenance and spares allowance • Revenue launch targeted for April 2014 Getting to April 2014 • Training programme in place supported by the new Simulator/s at Wiri depot • Onehunga line to Britomart electrification scheduled to be delivered Dec ‘13/Jan ‘14 • Sufficient contingency for service launch in April 2014 4 Apppproach to service launch Reliability Growth Running • As EMUs achieve Provisional Handover, additional running on weekends to further support reliability • Reliabilityygypgg Growth Running may be either simulated passenger running or actual revenue service running Concept of Operations • 10 mi nut e peak/ s per io d serv ice on a ll lines excep t OhOnehunga • 15 minute inter-peak between 7AM and 7PM (Transitional process i.e. Manukau) • 30 minute off peak period including Onehunga • 30 mi nut e all lines on Sa turd ay an d Sund ay Shuttle services – Papakura to Pukekohe • 20 minute peak service – change at Papakura • 60 minute service in the off-peak period including Saturday and Sunday 5 Approach for service introduction • To minimise
Recommended publications
  • Mangere-Otahuhu Local Board This Report Provides a Picture of Auckland Transport Activities Over the April - June 2018 Quarter
    ATTACHMENT A April - June 2018 Mangere-Otahuhu Local Board This report provides a picture of Auckland Transport activities over the April - June 2018 Quarter. The report is in two sections: (a) Information on AT projects that are located within the Mangere-Otahuhu Local Board area; (b) Information on Regional Projects. The numbering used in the report has no meaning other than as a reference to facilitate subsequent discussion. The report has been compiled by Auckland Transport's Elected Member Relationship Unit from data supplied by the Operations Division, Capital Development Division and Strategy and Planning Department. Tuesday, 24 July 2018 Page 1 of 12 Mangere-Otahuhu Assets and Maintenance Programme Item ID Start Finish Status Notes 35453 Bader/Idelwind New roundabout C.101345 Jun 17 Jun 19 Detailed Single lane roundabout option Roundabout Design presented to the Local Board in June 2018. Resolution expected supporting this proposal. This will allow detail design to begin. 35454 Bader Drive Road widening C.101346 Mar 17 May 18 Construction Detail design complete. Currently Widening seeking traffic resolution. Construction to start immediately after with contract being drawn up in August.. Tuesday, 24 July 2018 Page 2 of 12 Major Programme Item ID Start Finish Status Notes 35477 East West FN32 This is to provide local road improvements to support NZTA's new C.101099 Mar 16 Aug 23 Construction Stage 1 works on Bader Drive and Network freight connection betweenSH20/ Onehunga and SH1. It also Avenue Bus Stations is completed public transport and cycling improvements between Mangere and except for one minor BT element Sylvia Park.
    [Show full text]
  • Lifelines in Earthquakes a Case Study Based on Wellington
    208 LIFELINES IN EARTHQUAKES A CASE STUDY BASED ON WELLINGTON D. C. Hopkins1, J. L. Lumsden2 , J. A. Norton3 ABSTRACT This paper outlines the 1990 Centre for Advanced Engineering project which considered the vulnerability to earthquakes of all lifelines, including building se,vices, in the Wellington region. A case study approach was used involving representatives from se,vice companies, consultants, academics and technical specialists. Five task groups considered various aspects of lifelines se,vices, including definition of earthquake hazards in the region, descriptions of the services, analysis of vulnerability and identification of mitigation measures. Results of this work are outlined. Specific conclusions were reached on recommended mitigation measures and, through wide involvement of service company engineers and managers in the project, further work is continuing in Wellington and the methodology is being adapted for use elsewhere. 1. INTRODUCTION early 1991. lifelines, those services which support the day to day life of General objectives of the project were to: our communities, have become increasingly important in assess the vulnerability of lifelines recent years as technological developments lead us to greater identify mitigation measures and greater dependency on them. raise awareness of the importance of lifelines amongst service providers in both Wellington and elsewhere in Wellington's lifelines were recognised as uniquely vulnerable New Zealand in earthquake, but had received little attention. Not only is the city and region susceptible to earthquake shaking, it is crossed by several major active faults. In addition, being 2. SCOPE New Zealand's capital city it is the seat of government and the centre for much of the country's commercial activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Lawtalk Issue
    ISSUE 928 · MAY 2019 Finding a match Could more be done to match lawyers with the right pro bono clients? Tania Sharkey The Arbitration The benefits of Retiring from and the Pacific Amendment Act working flexibly practice Lawyers 2019: Further for mental health Association refinement and wellbeing Page 22 Page 28 Page 50 Page 81 Our commitment At MAS, we’re committed to doing what we can to make a positive impact on the health and wellbeing of future generations of New Zealanders, and to a more sustainable country. It’s why we’ve implemented a socially responsible investing approach across $1.4 billion of superannuation funds and insurance reserves and do not invest in the manufacture and sale of armaments, tobacco, or the exploration, extraction, refining and processing fossil fuels. Talk to us about our socially responsible Retirement Savings and KiwiSaver plans today by calling 0800 800 627 or visit mas.co.nz Winner at the 2019 Australian Financial Review’s Client Choice Awards. We are delighted to have won three awards: • Best Australasian Professional Services firm (A$50-200m) • Best Australasian Law & Related Services firm (A$50-200m) • Best Australasian provider to Government & Community. AUCKLAND WELLINGTON CHRISTCHURCH buddlefindlay.com STUDY TO BE A LEGAL EXECUTIVE Competition • Developed in conjunction Matters2019 with the Law Society Competition and Regulation • Part-time & full-time options • Auckland Central Campus Conference Pullman Hotel · Auckland · 25 and 26 July Register now for your chance to hear from some of the world’s
    [Show full text]
  • The Waterview Connection Motorway
    Waterview Connection Information Sheet THE WATERVIEW CONNECTION MOTORWAY WHEN WILL THE WATERVIEW WHAT ARE THE TRAFFIC WHAT IS THE CONNECTION OPEN TO BENEFITS OF THE WATERVIEW TRAFFIC? WATERVIEW CONNECTION? Construction is on schedule for opening in early By bridging the gap between the Southwestern CONNECTION? 2017 as planned. and Northwestern motorways, the Waterview Connection will complete Auckland’s Western Being built is 5km of 6-lane motorway Ring Route. This is a 48km motorway link from to connect State Highways 20 (the Manukau in the south to Albany in the north that Southwestern Motorway) and 16 (the WHO WILL OPERATE will bypass central Auckland. Northwestern Motorway). THE MOTORWAY? Completing the Western Ring Route has been There will be three lanes southbound and prioritised as a Road of National Significance three lanes northbound between Maioro The Well-Connected Alliance, which is building because of the contribution it will make to New Street, where S.H.20 now ends, and the the Waterview Connection, will form an alliance Zealand’s future prosperity. It will provide Auckland Great North Road interchange on S.H.16. with international tunnel controls specialists SICE NZ Ltd (Sociedad Ibérica de Construcciones with a resilient and reliable motorway network by Half of the new motorway is underground in Eléctricas) to operate and maintain the motorway reducing the region’s dependence on the single twin tunnels 2.4km long and up to 30m below for the first 10 years of its life. A team from SICE spine comprising State Highway 1 and the Auckland the surface between the Alan Wood Reserve has worked with the Well-Connected Alliance Harbour Bridge for business to business trips, in Owairaka and Waterview.
    [Show full text]
  • Rail Network Investment Programme
    RAIL NETWORK INVESTMENT PROGRAMME JUNE 2021 Cover: Renewing aged rail and turnouts is part of maintaining the network. This page: Upgrade work on the commuter networks is an important part of the investment programme. 2 | RAIL NETWORK INVESTMENT PROGRAMME CONTENTS 1. Foreword 4 2. Introduction and approval 5 • Rail Network Investment Programme at a glance 3. Strategic context 8 4. The national rail network today 12 5. Planning and prioritising investment 18 6. Investment – national freight and tourism network 24 7. Investment – Auckland and Wellington metro 40 8. Other investments 48 9. Delivering on this programme 50 10. Measuring success 52 11. Investment programme schedules 56 RAIL NETWORK INVESTMENT PROGRAMME | 3 1. FOREWORD KiwiRail is pleased to present this This new investment approach marks a turning point that is crucial to securing the future of rail and unlocking its inaugural Rail Network Investment full potential. Programme. KiwiRail now has certainty about the projected role of rail Rail in New Zealand is on the cusp of in New Zealand’s future, and a commitment to provide an exciting new era. the funding needed to support that role. Rail has an increasingly important role to play in the This Rail Network Investment Programme (RNIP) sets out transport sector, helping commuters and products get the tranches of work to ensure the country has a reliable, where they need to go – in particular, linking workers resilient and safe rail network. with their workplaces in New Zealand’s biggest cities, and KiwiRail is excited about taking the next steps towards connecting the nation’s exporters to the world.
    [Show full text]
  • LOWER NORTH ISLAND LONGER-DISTANCE ROLLING STOCK BUSINESS CASE PREPARED for GREATER WELLINGTON REGIONAL COUNCIL 2 December 2019
    LOWER NORTH ISLAND LONGER-DISTANCE ROLLING STOCK BUSINESS CASE PREPARED FOR GREATER WELLINGTON REGIONAL COUNCIL 2 December 2019 This document has been prepared for the benefit of Greater Wellington Regional Council. No liability is accepted by this company or any employee or sub-consultant of this company with respect to its use by any other person. This disclaimer shall apply notwithstanding that the report may be made available to other persons for an application for permission or approval to fulfil a legal requirement. QUALITY STATEMENT PROJECT MANAGER PROJECT TECHNICAL LEAD Doug Weir Doug Weir PREPARED BY Doug Weir, Andrew Liese CHECKED BY Jamie Whittaker, Doug Weir, Deepa Seares REVIEWED BY Jamie Whittaker, Phil Peet APPROVED FOR ISSUE BY Doug Weir WELLINGTON Level 13, 80 The Terrace, Wellington 6011 PO Box 13-052, Armagh, Christchurch 8141 TEL +64 4 381 6700 REVISION SCHEDULE Authorisation Rev Date Description No. Prepared Checked Reviewed Approved by by by by 1 27/07/18 First Draft Final DW, AL JW JW DW 2 24/10/18 Updated First Draft Final DW JW JW DW Revised Draft Final (GWRC 3 05/08/19 DW DW PP DW Sustainable Transport Committee) 3 20/08/19 Updated Revised Draft Final DW DS PP DW Amended Draft Final 4 26/09/19 DW DW PP DW (GWRC Council) 5 02/12/19 Final DW DW PP DW Stantec │ Lower North Island Longer-Distance Rolling Stock Business Case │ 2 December 2019 Status: Final │ Project No.: 310200204 │ Our ref: 310200204 191202 Lower North Island Longer-Distance Rolling Stock Busines Case - Final.docx Executive Summary Introduction This business case has been prepared by Stantec New Zealand and Greater Wellington Regional Council (GWRC), with input from key stakeholders including KiwiRail, Transdev, Horizons Regional Council and the NZ Transport Agency (NZTA), and economic peer review by Transport Futures Limited.
    [Show full text]
  • The First Train Drivers from D to DR Light Rail 2019 North Tassie
    April 2019 TM Remember when: The irst train drivers From D to DR Light Rail 2019 North Tassie trampings South East Queensland standard gauge The Great South Paciic Express goes west New loops, signalling & platform in the Central West Published monthly by the Australian Railway Historical Society (NSW Division) Editor Bruce Belbin April 2019 • $10.00 TM Assistant Editor Shane O’Neil April 2019 National Affairs Lawrance Ryan Volume 57, Number 4 Editorial Assistant Darren Tulk International Ken Date Remember when: General Manager Paul Scells The irst train drivers Subscriptions: Ph: 02 9699 4595 Fax: 02 9699 1714 Editorial Office: Ph: 02 8394 9016 Fax: 02 9699 1714 ARHS Bookshop: Ph: 02 9699 4595 Fax: 02 9699 1714 Mail: 67 Renwick Street, Redfern NSW 2016 Publisher: Australian Railway Historical Society NSW Division, ACN 000 538 803 From D to DR Light Rail 2019 Print Post 100009942 North Tassie trampings South East Queensland standard gauge Publication No. The Great South Paciic Express goes west New loops, signalling & platform in the Central West Newsagent Ovato Retail Distribution Pty Ltd Published monthly by the Australian Railway Historical Society (NSW Division) Distribution Mailing & Distribution Ligare Pty Limited and Australia Post Printing Ligare Pty Limited Features Website www.railwaydigest.com.au Central West NSW: New loops, signalling and platform 30 Facebook www.facebook.com/railwaydigest In recent years a resurgence in intrastate freight business, especially Contributor Guidelines port-related container services and additional passenger services, has Articles and illustrations remain the copyright of the author and publisher. led to an increase in rail activity on the NSW Western Line.
    [Show full text]
  • Bay of Plenty Region Passenger and Freight Rail FINAL Report May 2019
    1 | P a g e Bay of Plenty Passenger and Freight Rail Phase 1 Investigation Report May 2019 Contents Page Contents Page ......................................................................................................................................... 2 1.0 Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 4 2.0 Overall Findings and Future Opportunities ................................................................................. 6 2.1 Overall Findings ....................................................................................................................... 6 2.2 Future Opportunities ............................................................................................................ 10 3.0 Bay of Plenty Passenger and Freight Rail Investigation 2019 ................................................... 13 3.1 Phase 1 Investigation ............................................................................................................ 13 3.2 Stakeholders / Partners ........................................................................................................ 13 3.3 New Zealand Transport Agency Business Case Approach .................................................... 14 3.4 Bay of Plenty Rail Strategy 2007 ........................................................................................... 14 4.0 National Strategy and Policy Settings ......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • St Lukes Interchange (St Lukes Interchange) to Be Shown As Road Purposes for the Project (St Lukes Interchange)
    6 Henderson Valley Road, Henderson, Auckland 0612 Private Bag 92250, Auckland 1142, New Zealand Ph 09 355 3553 Fax 09 355 3550 Notice of Requirement NOTICE OF REQUIREMENT FOR A DESIGNATION UNDER SECTION 168(2) OF THE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ACT 1991 (RMA) TO: Auckland Council FROM: Auckland Transport 6 Henderson Valley Road Henderson Private Bag 92250 Auckland AUCKLAND TRANSPORT (an Auckland Council Controlled Organisation) as Requiring Authority under section 167 of the Resource Management Act 1991 gives notice of a requirement for a designation in the Auckland Council District Plan for works being the Waterview Connection SH16 St Lukes Interchange (St Lukes Interchange) to be shown as road purposes for the Project (St Lukes Interchange). 1. SUMMARY The St Lukes Interchange will generally comprise: Auckland Transport gives notice of a requirement for an alteration to “Designations D05- 08 and B08-04” in the Auckland Council District Plan (Isthmus Section) 2011 (“District Plan”) to widen St Lukes Road and Great North Road at the St Lukes Interchange. The purpose of Designation D05-08 is for regional road and the purpose of designation B08-04 is for public road network. The designations are identified on District Plan Maps D05 and D06 and in Appendix B of the Planning Maps, copies of which are contained in Appendix A this NoR. Under Section 176A(2)(b) of the RMA it is not intended to submit an Outline Plan of Works prior to construction as the details of the proposed works, as referred to in Section 176A(3), are addressed in this NOR. The proposed works are in keeping with the purpose of designations D05-08 and B08-04.
    [Show full text]
  • Southern Line Ttbooklet Jul2018.Indd 2-3 24/07/18 10:09 AM to Britomart Via Ellerslie and Newmarket to Britomart Via Ellerslie and Newmarket
    to Britomart via Ellerslie and Newmarket to Britomart via Ellerslie and Newmarket Penrose Penrose Pukekohe Papakura Takanini Te Mahia Manurewa Homai Puhinui Papatoetoe Middlemore Otahuhu (Platform 1) Ellerslie Greenlane Remuera Newmarket Parnell Britomart Pukekohe Papakura Takanini Te Mahia Manurewa Homai Puhinui Papatoetoe Middlemore Otahuhu (Platform 1) Ellerslie Greenlane Remuera Newmarket Parnell Britomart Monday to Friday Monday to Friday (continued) - 05:14 05:18 05:20 05:22 05:25 05:31 05:33 05:36 05:39 05:44 05:47 05:49 05:52 05:55 05:59 06:04 - 15:24 15:28 15:30 15:32 15:35 15:41 15:43 15:46 15:49 15:54 15:57 15:59 16:02 16:05 16:09 16:14 05:13 05:29 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 15:13 15:29 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 05:34 05:38 05:40 05:42 05:45 05:51 05:53 05:56 05:59 06:04 06:07 06:09 06:12 06:15 06:19 06:24 - 15:34 15:38 15:40 15:42 15:45 15:51 15:53 15:56 15:59 16:04 16:07 16:09 16:12 16:15 16:19 16:24 - 05:54 05:58 06:00 06:02 06:05 06:11 06:13 06:16 06:19 06:24 06:27 06:29 06:32 06:35 06:39 06:44 15:21 15:37 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 05:43 05:59 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 15:42 15:46 15:48 15:50 15:53 16:00 16:02 16:05 16:09 16:14 16:17 16:19 16:22 16:25 16:29 16:34 - 06:04 06:08 06:10 06:12 06:15 06:21 06:23 06:26 06:29 06:34 06:37 06:39 06:42 06:45 06:49 06:54 - 15:54 15:58 16:00 16:02 16:05 16:11 16:13 16:16 16:19 16:24 16:27 16:29 16:32 16:35 16:39 16:44 - 06:12 06:16 06:18 06:20 06:23 06:30 06:32 06:35 06:39 06:44 06:47 06:49 06:52 06:55 06:59 07:04 15:43 15:59 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 06:03 06:19
    [Show full text]
  • Individual Submissions J - Z Contents Page
    Individual Submissions J - Z Contents Page Please note: As some submitters did not provide their first names they have been ordered in the submissions received list under their title. These submitters are as follows: o Mr Burgess is ordered in the submissions received list under ‗M‘ for Mr o Mrs Davey is ordered in the submissions received list under ‗M‘ for Mrs o Mrs Dromgool is ordered in the submissions received list under ‗M‘ for Mrs o Mrs Peters is ordered in the submissions received list under ‗M‘ for Mrs o Mr Ripley is ordered in the submissions received list under ‗M‘ for Mr We apologise for any confusion the above ordering of submissions may have caused. If your submission is not displayed here, contains incorrect information or is missing some parts, please email us on [email protected] or contact Mathew Stewart on (09) 447 4831 Sub # Submitter Page 851 J Dromgool 13 870 Jacob Phillips 13 15 Jacob Samuel 13 178 Jacqueline Anne Church 13 685 Jacqui Fisher 13 100 James Houston 13 854 James Lockhart 13 302 Jamie Revell 13 361 Jan Heijs 14 372 Jane Blow 14 309 Jane Briant-Turner 14 482 Janet Hunter 14 662 Janet Pates 14 656 Janie Flavell 14 634 Jarrod Ford (NB: we apologise if this name is incorrect, we were 14 unable to clearly decipher the writing) 718 Jason Lafaele 14 605 Jaydene Haku 15 746 Jeanette Collie 15 149 Jeanette Valerie Cooper 15 177 Jennifer Collett 15 681 Jennifer Olson 15 818 Jennifer Preston 15 832 Jenny TeWake 15 1 Sub # Submitter Page 373 Jeremy Lees-Green 15 85 Jesse McKenzie 16 843 Jessica Currie
    [Show full text]
  • Before a Board of Inquiry East West Link Proposal
    BEFORE A BOARD OF INQUIRY EAST WEST LINK PROPOSAL Under the Resource Management Act 1991 In the matter of a Board of Inquiry appointed under s149J of the Resource Management Act 1991 to consider notices of requirement and applications for resource consent made by the New Zealand Transport Agency in relation to the East West Link roading proposal in Auckland Statement of Evidence in Chief of Anthony David Cross on behalf of Auckland Transport dated 10 May 2017 BARRISTERS AND SOLICITORS A J L BEATSON SOLICITOR FOR THE SUBMITTER AUCKLAND LEVEL 22, VERO CENTRE, 48 SHORTLAND STREET PO BOX 4199, AUCKLAND 1140, DX CP20509, NEW ZEALAND TEL 64 9 916 8800 FAX 64 9 916 8801 EMAIL [email protected] Introduction 1. My full name is Anthony David Cross. I currently hold the position of Network Development Manager in the AT Metro (public transport) division of Auckland Transport (AT). 2. I hold a Bachelor of Regional Planning degree from Massey University. 3. I have 31 years’ experience in public transport planning. I worked at Wellington Regional Council between 1986 and 2006, and the Auckland Regional Transport Authority between 2006 and 2010. I have held my current role since AT was established in 2010. 4. In this role, I am responsible for specifying the routes and service levels (timetables) for all of Auckland’s bus services. Since 2012, I have led the AT project known as the New Network, which by the end of 2018 will result in a completely restructured network of simple, connected and more frequent bus routes across all of Auckland.
    [Show full text]