DOCSLIB.ORG

Underfamilj Glyphipteriginae – Hakmalar

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

glyphipterigidae: orthotelia • 1 NAMNGIVNING Orthotelia sparganella (Thunberg, 1788). KEY FACTS Wingspan 19–27 mm. Head and thorax light Originalbeskrivning: Tinea sparganella. Diss. D. Mus. Nat. brown. Thorax brownish with four dark streaks. Forewing Acad. Upsal.: 78. coppery brown, more or less glossy, with pale veins and a Etymologi: sparganellus = den lilla på igelknopp; växtsläk- small row of dark spots under wingfold. Univoltine; flight tet Sparganium; syftar på värdväxt; diminutivsuffixet -ellus period July–August. Larva in Sparganium spp., Iris spp. and (lat.). similar water-plants, mining in leaf, stem or fruit. Occurs Uttal: [Ortotélia sparganélla] very sparsely and somewhat sporadically around ditches and ponds in the southern third of Sweden. UNDERFAMILJ Glyphipteriginae – hakmalar STAM Arthropoda UNDERSTAM Hexapoda Underfamiljen Glyphipteriginae omfattar ungefär känns igen på sin besynnerliga vana att växelvis lyfta ORDNING Lepidoptera 400 arter fördelade på drygt 20 släkten. I Europa fram- och bakvingarna så att de till synes gnids mot ÖVERFAMILJ Yponomeutoidea re presenteras den emellertid endast av 17 arter som varandra när de sitter i vila. De har en välutvecklad FAMILJ Glyphipterigidae samtliga tillhör släktet Glyphipterix. Antalet arter sugsnabel, stora punktögon (oceller), uppåtböjda la- UNDERFAMILJ är förhållandevis litet i västra Palearktis, medan en bialpalper och tvåledade maxillarpalper. I framvingen SLÄKTE mängd arter finns i östra Asien (inklusive Japan). I går vingribban R4 till framkanten – inte till vingspet- Nordamerika finns också ett stort antal arter, vilka sen. Hanens åttonde bakkroppssegment är koniskt till det yttre liknar de europeiska arterna. Förutom med en förstorad ryggplåt. tuvullshakmal G. haworthana har ingen art holarktisk Larverna lever främst på gräs eller halvgräs. Pup- utbredning (Diakonoff 1986). porna saknar vassa utskott på huvudet och ligger i en De fullbildade fjärilarna är dagflygare och kan lätt nätmaskig, fast kokong. förväxlas med vecklare inom släktet Cydia, men de 1 2 3 De fullbildade fjärilarna i underfamiljen Glyphipteriginae är dagflygare. Arterna förekom- 4 mer i en mängd olika biotoper, där larverna lever av främst gräs och halvgräs. Gräshakmal Glyphipterix simpliciella (1) är en vanlig fjäril i södra halvan av Sverige. Den påträffas ofta dagtid i buskmarker och öppna skogsmarker när den sitter i solskenet på örter. Larven äter frön av olika gräs. Starrhakmal G. forsterella (2) känns lätt igen på att den har en silver- glänsande punkt i framvingens svarta spetsfläck. Arten förekommer i kärrmarker, där lar- ven lever av olika starrar Carex spp. Tuvullshakmal G. haworthana (3) lever i kärrmarker, och larven lever i axet hos ull Eriophorum spp. Frylhakmal G. bergstraesserella (4) är bred- vingad och saknar tydligt hack i framvingens ytterkant. Den förekommer ganska allmänt i barrskogar, där larven lever av frylen Luzula spp. FOTO: RONNY LINDMAN (1, 2, 3), SVEN JOHANSSON (4) 2 • nationalnyckeln till sveriges flora och fauna 1 2 Larven av starrhakmal Glyphipterix forsterella äter frön i Sc R1 R 2 R3 axet hos olika starrar (1), t.ex. skärmstarr Carex remota, R4 fram till början av maj. Larven bereder en puppkammare i axet, där den sedan förpuppas (2). R5 FOTO: RUDOLF BRYNER M1 M2 M3 CuA1 1A CuA2 Sc+R1 Rs M1 M2 2A M3 1A CuA2 CuA1 Hos arterna i underfamiljen Glyphipteriginae löper fram- vingens vingribba R4 till framkanten – inte till vingspetsen som hos igelknoppsmal Orthotelia sparganella (under- familjen Orthoteliinae). Bilden visar vingribbsmönstret hos tuvullshakmal Glyphipterix haworthana. ILLUSTRATION: TORBJÖRN ÖSTMAN SLÄKTE Glyphipterix STAM Arthropoda UNDERSTAM Hexapoda ORDNING Lepidoptera Fjärilarna i släktet Glyphipterix är små med ett ving- genitalprepareringen sker på ett likvärdigt sätt så att ÖVERFAMILJ Yponomeutoidea spann på 6–13 mm. I framvingens ytterkant finns detaljerna blir jämförbara. FAMILJ Glyphipterigidae hos de flesta arter ett mer eller mindre iögonfallande UNDERFAMILJ Glyphipteriginae hack, och utmed fram- och bakkanten finns vita, kor- NAMNGIVNING Glyphipterix Hübner, [1825]. Verz. Bekannt. SLÄKTE Schmett.: 421. tare eller längre streck (hakar). Etymologi: Glyphipterix = med hack i vingen; glyphis (gr.) = Många av arterna är så lika varandra att under- hack; pteryx (gr.) = fjäder, vinge; syftar på att flertalet arter sökning av genitalierna krävs för säker artbestäm- har ett hack i framvingens ytterkant strax under ning. Även genitalierna hos de olika arterna är vingspetsen. mycket snarlika, och därför är det viktigt att .
Recommended publications
  • Belper Parks Local Nature Reserve & Manor Recreation Ground Management Plan

    Belper Parks Local Nature Reserve & Manor Recreation Ground Management Plan

    Belper Parks Local Nature Reserve & Manor Recreation Ground Management Plan Amber Valley Borough Council 1 Belper Parks LNR & Manor Recreation Ground Amber Valley Borough Council Management Plan 2018 – 2023 Document History Date Written Description Author (s) November 2006 Management Plan 2007 - 2012 AVBC – Wildlife Trust – Groundwork Trust November 2011 Management Plan 2012 - 2017 AVBC – Wildlife Trust – Groundwork Trust January 2018 Management Plan 2018 – 2023 AVBC – Wildlife Trust – Groundwork Trust Contact: Richard Hodgkinson Open Spaces Officer Amber Valley Borough Council Landscapes, Growth & Community Safety Town Hall Ripley Derbyshire DE5 3BT Direct Line Tel: 01773 841320 Main Switch Board: 01773 570222 Website: www.ambervalley.gov.uk Email: [email protected] 2 Contents Page Executive Summary Chapter 1. Introduction, background & context 1.0 Introduction & background 6 2.0 Vision 6 3.0 Aims 6 4.0 Site name 7 5.0 Location & size 7 6.0 Site description 8 7.0 Land tenure 13 8.0 Legal factors 13 9.0 Local demographics 14 10.0 History 15 Chapter 2. Where are we now? 11.0 Introduction 19 12.0 The Green Flag Award 19 13.0 A welcoming place 19 14.0 Healthy, safe and secure 22 15.0 Well maintained and clean 25 16.0 Environmental Management 26 17.0 Biodiversity, Landscape and Heritage 28 18.0 Community involvement 38 19.0 Marketing and Communication 41 20.0 Management 42 Chapter 3. Where do we want to go? 21.0 Introduction 44 22.0 Aims and objectives - Action Plan 44 23.0 Conservation Maintenance 48 Additional information
  • THE MINISTRY of DEFENCE CONSERVATION MAGAZINE Number 38 • 2009

    THE MINISTRY of DEFENCE CONSERVATION MAGAZINE Number 38 • 2009

    THE MINISTRY OF DEFENCE CONSERVATION MAGAZINE Number 38 • 2009 Otters in STANTA p12 Diving into History p26 Grazing towards Sustainability p40 Foreword by Alan Titchmarsh THE MINISTRY OF DEFENCE CONSERVATION MAGAZINE Number 38 • 2009 Editor – Rebekah Jones Defence Estates Designed by – Liaison Design Printed by – Corporate Document Services (CDS) Editorial Board – Simon Adamson (Chair) Keith Maddison Julie Cannell Ennid Canniford Pragati Baddhan Editorial Contact – Sanctuary Team Property Directorate Defence Estates Kingston Road Sutton Coldfield B75 7RL E-mail: [email protected] Tel: 0121 311 3734/ 2183 Cover image credit: White park cattle on Salisbury Plain Photography: Guy Hagg Silver-studded blue butterfly © Iain Perkins Sanctuary is a free publication. Submissions: If you would like to contribute For further copies: Forms and Publications to Sanctuary Magazine or enter future Building C16 Sanctuary Awards please contact Rebekah C Site Jones, Editor at: [email protected]. Lower Arncott Bicester The opinions expressed in the magazine are not necessarily those of the Ministry OX25 1LP of Defence. Nothwithstanding Section 48 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents E-mail: [email protected] Act 1988, the Ministry of Defence reserves the right to publish authors’ literary and photographic contributions to Sanctuary in further and similar publications Sanctuary is an annual publication about conservation of the owned by the Ministry of Defence. This is subject to contrary agreement, which natural and historic environment on the defence estate. It must be communicated to the editor in writing. Authors’ contributions will illustrates how the Ministry of Defence (MOD) is undertaking be acknowledged with each and every publication.
  • Additions, Deletions and Corrections to An

    Additions, Deletions and Corrections to An

    Bulletin of the Irish Biogeographical Society No. 36 (2012) ADDITIONS, DELETIONS AND CORRECTIONS TO AN ANNOTATED CHECKLIST OF THE IRISH BUTTERFLIES AND MOTHS (LEPIDOPTERA) WITH A CONCISE CHECKLIST OF IRISH SPECIES AND ELACHISTA BIATOMELLA (STAINTON, 1848) NEW TO IRELAND K. G. M. Bond1 and J. P. O’Connor2 1Department of Zoology and Animal Ecology, School of BEES, University College Cork, Distillery Fields, North Mall, Cork, Ireland. e-mail: <[email protected]> 2Emeritus Entomologist, National Museum of Ireland, Kildare Street, Dublin 2, Ireland. Abstract Additions, deletions and corrections are made to the Irish checklist of butterflies and moths (Lepidoptera). Elachista biatomella (Stainton, 1848) is added to the Irish list. The total number of confirmed Irish species of Lepidoptera now stands at 1480. Key words: Lepidoptera, additions, deletions, corrections, Irish list, Elachista biatomella Introduction Bond, Nash and O’Connor (2006) provided a checklist of the Irish Lepidoptera. Since its publication, many new discoveries have been made and are reported here. In addition, several deletions have been made. A concise and updated checklist is provided. The following abbreviations are used in the text: BM(NH) – The Natural History Museum, London; NMINH – National Museum of Ireland, Natural History, Dublin. The total number of confirmed Irish species now stands at 1480, an addition of 68 since Bond et al. (2006). Taxonomic arrangement As a result of recent systematic research, it has been necessary to replace the arrangement familiar to British and Irish Lepidopterists by the Fauna Europaea [FE] system used by Karsholt 60 Bulletin of the Irish Biogeographical Society No. 36 (2012) and Razowski, which is widely used in continental Europe.
  • South-Central England Regional Action Plan

    South-Central England Regional Action Plan

    Butterfly Conservation South-Central England Regional Action Plan This action plan was produced in response to the Action for Butterflies project funded by WWF, EN, SNH and CCW by Dr Andy Barker, Mike Fuller & Bill Shreeves August 2000 Registered Office of Butterfly Conservation: Manor Yard, East Lulworth, Wareham, Dorset, BH20 5QP. Registered in England No. 2206468 Registered Charity No. 254937. Executive Summary This document sets out the 'Action Plan' for butterflies, moths and their habitats in South- Central England (Dorset, Hampshire, Isle of Wight & Wiltshire), for the period 2000- 2010. It has been produced by the three Branches of Butterfly Conservation within the region, in consultation with various other governmental and non-governmental organisations. Some of the aims and objectives will undoubtedly be achieved during this period, but some of the more fundamental challenges may well take much longer, and will probably continue for several decades. The main conservation priorities identified for the region are as follows: a) Species Protection ! To arrest the decline of all butterfly and moth species in South-Central region, with special emphasis on the 15 high priority and 6 medium priority butterfly species and the 37 high priority and 96 medium priority macro-moths. ! To seek opportunities to extend breeding areas, and connectivity of breeding areas, of high and medium priority butterflies and moths. b) Surveys, Monitoring & Research ! To undertake ecological research on those species for which existing knowledge is inadequate. Aim to publish findings of research. ! To continue the high level of butterfly transect monitoring, and to develop a programme of survey work and monitoring for the high and medium priority moths.
  • The Smaller Moths of Staffordshire Updated and Revised Edition

    The Smaller Moths of Staffordshire Updated and Revised Edition

    The Smaller Moths of Staffordshire Updated and Revised Edition D.W. Emley 2014 Staffordshire Biological Recording Scheme Publication No. 22 1 The Smaller Moths of Staffordshire Updated and Revised Edition By D.W. Emley 2014 Staffordshire Biological Recording Scheme Publication No. 22 Published by Staffordshire Ecological Record, Wolseley Bridge, Stafford Copyright © D.W. Emley, 2014 ISBN (online version): 978-1-910434-00-0 Available from : http://www.staffs-ecology.org.uk Front cover : Beautiful Plume Amblyptilia acanthadactyla, Dave Emley Introduction to the up-dated and revised edition ............................................................................................ 1 Acknowledgements ......................................................................................................................................... 2 MICROPTERIGIDAE ...................................................................................................................................... 3 ERIOCRANIIDAE ........................................................................................................................................... 3 NEPTICULIDAE .............................................................................................................................................. 4 OPOSTEGIDAE .............................................................................................................................................. 6 HELIOZELIDAE .............................................................................................................................................
  • Bioloģiskā Daudzveidība Gaujas Nacionālajā Parkā

    Bioloģiskā Daudzveidība Gaujas Nacionālajā Parkā

    BIOLOĢISKĀ DAUDZVEIDĪBA GAUJAS NACIONĀLAJĀ PARKĀ Biodiversity in Gauja national Park AUTORI / AUTHORS Austra Āboliņa, Jānis Birzaks, Ilze Čakare, Andris Čeirāns, Inita Dāniele, Lelde Eņģele, Edīte Juceviča, Mārtiņš Kalniņš, Aina Karpa, Viesturs Ķerus, Rudīte Limbēna, Diāna Meiere, Ansis Opmanis, Māra Pakalne, Digna Pilāte, Valdis Pilāts, Alfons Piterāns, Arkādijs Poppels, Edmunds Račinskis, Mudīte Rudzīte, Solvita Rūsiņa, Ineta Salmane, Liene Salmiņa, Nikolajs Savenkovs, Dmitrijs Teļnovs, Andris Urtāns sastādījis / Compiled by Valdis Pilāts Gaujas nacionālā parka administrācija / Gauja National Park Administration Sigulda, 2007 Finansējis / Funded by Latvijas vides aizsardzības fonds / Latvian Environmental Protection Fund b i o l o Ģ i s K ā d a u d ZV e i d ī b a G a u j a s n a C i o n ā l a j ā p a RK ā IeteIcamaIs cItēšanas veIds Pilāts V. (red.) 2007. Bioloģiskā daudzveidība Gaujas nacionālajā parkā. Sigulda, Gaujas nacionālā parka administrācija. Recommended cItatIon Pilāts V. (ed.) 2007. Biodiversity in Gauja National Park. Sigulda, Gauja National Park Administration. nodaļu autoRI / LIst of contRIbutoRs Austra Āboliņa, Latvijas Valsts Mežzinātnes institūts “Silava”, [email protected] Jānis Birzaks, Latvijas Zivju resursu aģentūra, [email protected] Ilze Čakare, Gaujas NP administrācija, [email protected] Andris Čeirāns, Latvijas Universitātes Bioloģijas fakultāte, [email protected] Inita Dāniele, Latvijas Dabas muzejs, [email protected] Lelde Eņģele, Latvijas Dabas fonds, [email protected] Edīte Juceviča,
  • Latvijas Dabiskie Meži

    Latvijas Dabiskie Meži

    WWF- PASAULES DABAS FONDA PROJEKTS LV0004 LATVIJAS DABISKIE MEŽI PĒTĪJUMS PAR MEŽA VĒSTURI, BIOLOĂISKĀS DAUDZVEIDĪBAS STRUKTŪRĀM UN ATKARĪGAJĀM SUGĀM (1995. - 1996.) Uvis Suško projekta īstenotājs WWF LATVIJAS PROGRAMMAS BIROJS 1997 2 Suško Uvis, 1997. Latvijas dabiskie meži. Pētījums par meža vēsturi, bioloăiskās daudzveidības struktūrām un atkarīgajām sugām. WWF Latvijas Programmas birojs.- Rīga.- 180 lpp. Projekta eksperti: Inita Avota Austra ĀboliĦa Arvīds Barševskis Ina Brauna Irēna Fatare Ăertrūde Gavrilova Ilze Janele Diāna Meiere Digna Pilāte Valdis Pilāts Alfons Piterāns Normunds Priedītis Ilze Rēriha Skaidrīte Ruskule Nikolajs Savenkovs Uvis Suško Viesturs Šulcs Edgars Vimba Tatjana Zorenko Aldis LiepiĦš, Jānis OzoliĦš, Miks RantiĦš Atslēgas vārdi: dabiskais mežs, meža vēsture, neapsaimniekots mežs, apsaimniekots mežs, stādīts (mākslīgs) mežs, ilglaicība (kontinuitāte), bioloăiskā daudzveidība, struktūras, indikatori, gĜotsēnes, cepurīšu sēnes, piepju sēnes, ėērpji, sūnaugi, vaskulārie augi, vaboles, tauriĦi, gliemji, zīdītāji, apdraudētās sugas, ekoloăiski atbilstīga mežsaimniecība Projekta rīkotājdirektors: Uăis Rotbergs (WWF- Pasaules Dabas fonda Latvijas Programmas birojs) Projekta sadarbības partneris Dānijā: Peter Friis M¸ller (GEUS- Dānijas un Grenlandes Ăeologijas institūts) Kartogrāfisko attēlu un shēmu veidotājs: Janeks Kamerovskis ZiĦojumā paustais viedoklis pieder autoram un obligāti neatspoguĜo WWF viedokli © WWF, 1997 Visas tiesības rezervētas 3 SATURS IEVADS ..............................................................................................................................

  • British Journal of Entomology and Natural History

    199' MARCH , ,,. __. ISSN 0952-7583 Vol. 10. Part 1 QL461. B74 V. 10 no. 1 March 1997 BRITISH JOURNAL OF ENTOMOLOGY AND NATURAL HISTORY BRITISH JOURNAL OF ENTOMOLOGY AND NATURAL HISTORY Published by the British Entomological and Natural History Society and incorporating its Proceedings and Transactions Editor: Richard A. Jones, B.Sc. F.R.E.S., F.L.S. 13 Bellwood Road Nunhead London SE15 3DE (Tel: 0171 732 2440) (Fax: 0171 277 8725) Editorial Committee: D. J. L. Agassiz, M.A.. Ph.D.. F.R.E.S. T. G. Howarth. B.E.M., F.R.E.S. R. D. G. Barrington, B.Sc. I. F. G. McLean. Ph.D.. F.R.E.S P. J. Chandler, B.Sc, F.R.E.S. M. J. Simmons, M.Sc. B. Goater, B.Sc, M.LBiol. P. A. Sokoloff, M.Sc, C.Biol.. M.I. Biol.. F.R.E.S. A. J. Halstead. M.Sc. F.R.E.S. T. R. E. Southwood. K. B.. D.Sc. F.R.E.S. R. D. Hawkins. M.A. R. W. J. Uffen. M.Sc, F.R.E.S. P. J. Hodae B. K. West, B.Ed. British Journal of Entomology and Natural History is published by the British Entomological and Natural History Society, Dinton Pastures Country Park, Davis Street, Hurst. Reading, Berkshire RGIO OTH. UK. Tel: 01734-321402. The Journal is distributed free to BENHS members. CT 1997 British Entomological and Natural History Society. Typeset by Dobbie Typesetting Limited. Tavistock, Devon. Printed in England by Henry Ling Ltd. Dorchester, Dorset. BRITISH ENTOMOLOGICAL AND NATURAL HISTORY SOCIETY Registered charity number: 213149 Meetings of the Society are held regularly in London, at the rooms of the Royal Entomological Society, 41 Queen's Gate, London SW7 and the well-known ANNUAL EXHIBITION is planned for Saturday 25 October 1997 at Imperial College, London SW7.

  • Cyclopelta Robusta, a New Species of Dinidorid Bugs

    P O L I S H JOU R NAL OF ENTOM O LOG Y POL SKIE PISMO ENTOMOL OGICZ N E VOL. 80: 83-116 Gdynia 31 March 2011 DOI: 10.2478/v10200-011-0007-2 Contribution to knowledge of the butterflies and moths (Lepidoptera) of north-eastern Poland with a description of a new tineid species from the genus Monopis HÜBNER, 1825 JAN ŠUMPICH *, JAN LIŠKA **, IVO DVOŘÁK *** * CZ-582 61 Česká Bělá 212, Czech Republic; e-mail: [email protected]; ** Forestry and Game Management Research Institute Jíloviště-Strnady, CZ–156 04 Prague 5 – Zbraslav, Czech Republic; e-mail: [email protected]; *** Tylova 23, CZ-586 01 Jihlava, Czech Republic; e-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT. This work contains faunistic data on the occurrence of 677 butterfly and moth species found during 2000-2008 in north-eastern Poland (Podlasie Province). The species Monopis fenestratella (HEYDEN, 1863), Amphisbatis elsae SVENSSON, 1982, Coleophora ptarmicia WALSINGHAM, 1910 and Epermenia falciformis (HAWORTH, 1828) were found in Poland for the first time. Recent data are provided for five other species – Monochroa servella (ZELLER, 1839), Teleiodes aenigma SATTLER, 1983, Dichomeris limosella (SCHLÄGER, 1849), Aethes rutilana (HÜBNER, 1817) and Eana derivana (LA HARPE, 1858) – known in Poland only from historical data. The occurrence in Podlasie of 75 species is reported for the first time, and the occurrence of 6 other species is confirmed for this area after more than 50 years. This work also describes a new species, Monopis bisonella ŠUMPICH, sp. n. A number of species are very rare in Poland and occur only locally.
  • PDF Printing 600

    PDF Printing 600

    KUCHLEIN,J. H. & CH.G. A. M. NAVES,1999. The Dutch PETERSEN,G., 1969. Beitrage zur Insekten-Fauna der Nieuwe en interessante Microlepidoptera uit species of Zeiraphera, with Z. mf~tranaas an addi- DDR: Lepidoptera - Tineidae. - Beitrage zur Ento- tion to the Dutch list (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). - En- mologie 19: 311-388. tomologische Berichten, Amsterdam 59: 1-6. PRINS,W. DE, 1988. Het genus Pseudatemelia Rebel, Nederland in hoofdzaak van de jaren 1997 en 1998 LANGOHR,G. R., 1972. Drie nieuwe Microlepidoptera 1910 in België (Lepidoptera: Oecophoridae) - Phe- voor de Nederlandse fauna. - Entomologische Berich- gea 16: 105-113. (Lepidoptera) ten, Amsterdam 32: 53-54. SATTLER,K., 1960. Generische Gmppiemng der euro- LANGOHR,G. R., 1975. Zes soorten Microlepidoptera paischen Arten der Sammelgattung Gelechia (Lepi- nieuw voor de Nederlandse fauna. - Entomologische doptera, Gelechiidae). - Deutsche Entomologische Berichten, Amsterdam 35: 78-80. Zeitschrift 7: 10-1 18. LANGOHR,G. R. & A. E. P. SCHREURS,1987. Nieuwe en SNELLEN,P. C. T., 1882. De vlinders van Nederland, Mi- minder gewone Lepidoptera voor de Nederlandse fau- crolepidoptera, 2 delen: I-XIII, 1-1196. Brill, Lei- HUISMAN, K. J. & J. C. KOSTER, 2000. NEW AND INTERESTING MICROLEPIDOPTERA FROM THE na (7). - Entomologische Berichten, Amsterdam 47: den. NETHERLANDS IN PARTICULAR FROM THE YEARS 1997 AND 1998 (LEPIDOPTERA). ENT. BER., AMST. 60 42-48. STIGTER,H. & A. VAN FRANKENHUYZEN,1991. Phyllono- (11): 193-216. LYCKLAMAA NIJEHOLT, H. J., 1928. [Zonder titel]. - Tijd- rycter leucographella, een voor Nederland nieuwe schrift voor Entomologie 71: 37-38. bladmineerder (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae). - Ento- Abstract: This is the eleventh compilation of interesting Microlepidoptera collected in The Netherlands, covenng main- NIEUKERKEN,E.
  • Knopbiesmotje (Glyphipterix Schoenicolella) En Knopbies (Schoenus Nigricans) (Lepidoptera: Glyphipterigidae) Wilfried H.O

    Knopbiesmotje (Glyphipterix Schoenicolella) En Knopbies (Schoenus Nigricans) (Lepidoptera: Glyphipterigidae) Wilfried H.O

    142 entomologische berichten 69 (4) 2009 Knopbiesmotje (Glyphipterix schoenicolella) en knopbies (Schoenus nigricans) (Lepidoptera: Glyphipterigidae) Wilfried H.O. Ernst TREFWOORDEN Ichneumonidae, Cryptinae, Diadegma sordipes, duinvallei, levenscyclus, parasitaire Hymenoptera, verspreiding, vliegtijd, voedsel Entomologische Berichten 69(4): 142-149 In jonge vruchtdragende hoofdjes van de knopbies ontwikkelen zich de rupsen van het knopbiesmotje tot vlinder. Toch komt niet in iedere populatie van de knopbies dit vlindermotje voor. Daarom zijn levens- cyclus, voedsel, populatieomvang en vliegtijden van het knopbies- motje in Nederlandse duinvalleien over een periode van 15 jaar onderzocht. Uit de analyse blijkt dat alleen vitale knopbiespopulaties de ontwikkeling van knopbiesmotjes mogelijk maken, mits het water in de zomer niet boven het maaiveld staat. Een lage kwaliteit en een geringe omvang van de knopbiespopulatie zijn andere oorzaken voor de afwezigheid van knopbiesmotjes. De sluipwespen die parasiteren op het knopbiesmotje zijn ook opgespoord. De aanwezigheid van knopbiesmotjes is een goede indicator voor de kwaliteit van vochtige duinvalleien en een goede voorspeller voor het succes van regeneratie van dit ecosysteem. Inleiding Onderzoeksmethode Wereldwijd zijn 384 soorten motvlindertjes behorend tot de In de periode van 1991-2004 werd het meeste onderzoek uit- familie Glyphipterigidae beschreven, waarvan nagenoeg twee- gevoerd in de vochtige duinvalleien (figuur 2) van het Reggers- derde tot het geslacht Glyphipterix gerekend wordt (Scudder & Sandervlak in het Noordhollands Duinreservaat (NHD) in Cannings 2007). Van de 21 genera komen in Nederland alleen maximaal vijf en in de Kil (NHD) in drie ruimtelijk van elkaar vijf Glyphipterix-soorten en een Orthothelila-soort voor (Stichting gescheiden sub-populaties van de knopbies. Naast twee onge- Tinea 2009).
  • Species List 09/01/2017

    Species List 09/01/2017

    1 of 145 Glasgow Species List 09/01/2017 Group Type Group Taxon Common name Records First year Last year Designated Local BAP Aquatic Invertebrates acarine Hydracarina 11 2003 2010 Aquatic Invertebrates acarine Hydrachna 1 2007 2007 Aquatic Invertebrates amoeba Amoeba lescherae 1 1961 1961 Aquatic Invertebrates amoeba Polychaos dubium 2 1899 1899 Aquatic Invertebrates annelid Alboglossiphonia heteroclita 33 1959 2004 Aquatic Invertebrates annelid Dina lineata 4 1972 1973 Aquatic Invertebrates annelid Enchytraeidae Whiteworm 1 1999 1999 Aquatic Invertebrates annelid Erpobdella octoculata leeches 31 1913 2013 Aquatic Invertebrates annelid Erpobdella testacea 5 1995 2003 Aquatic Invertebrates annelid Glossiphonia complanata 16 1913 2013 Aquatic Invertebrates annelid Glossiphonia paludosa 1 1973 Aquatic Invertebrates annelid Haemopis sanguisuga horse leech 7 1913 2013 Aquatic Invertebrates annelid Helobdella stagnalis 33 1913 2014 Aquatic Invertebrates annelid Hirudinea Leech 10 1992 2016 Aquatic Invertebrates annelid Lumbriculidae 13 1997 2004 Aquatic Invertebrates annelid Naididae 16 1997 2004 Aquatic Invertebrates annelid Oligochaeta 36 1982 2015 Aquatic Invertebrates annelid Piscicolidae 1 2003 2003 Aquatic Invertebrates annelid Stylaria lacustris 1 1995 1995 Aquatic Invertebrates annelid Theromyzon tessulatum duck leech 10 1959 1998 Aquatic Invertebrates annelid Trochaeta subviridis 3 1973 Aquatic Invertebrates annelid Trocheta bykowskii 1 1981 1981 Aquatic Invertebrates annelid Trocheta subviridis 4 1966 1973 Aquatic Invertebrates annelid