© Entomologica Fennica. 25 February 2011

New and interesting records of from the Kola Peninsula, Northwestern , in 2000–2009

Mikhail V. Kozlov & Jaakko Kullberg

Kozlov, M. V. & Kullberg, J. 2010: New and interesting records of Lepidoptera from the Kola Peninsula, Northwestern Russia, in 2000–2009. — Entomol. Fen- nica 21: 254–272. Extensive sampling during 2000–2009 resulted in discovery of 65 of Lepidoptera that have not been reported from the Kola Peninsula (i.e., Mur- manskaya oblast of Russia) in our earlier publications. Critical revision of data published in several papers by the Russian scientists and in the comprehensive Catalogue of the Lepidoptera of Russia added further 59 species to the regional fauna (among which we controlled records of 15 species), while 60 species are excluded as erroneous or doubtful records. We also confirmed records of 12 spe- cies which were known from old publications only, and reported interesting find- ings of 71 rare species that expand their distribution range or demonstrate inter- esting ecological patterns. The fauna of and of the Murmansk region now totals 813 species. M. V. Kozlov, Section of Ecology, University of Turku, FI-20014 Turku, ; E-mail: [email protected] J. Kullberg, Zoological Museum, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 17, FI-00014 Helsinki, Finland; E-mail: [email protected] Received 27 February 2010, accepted 3 June 2010

1. Introduction Since completion of the previous addition to the regional checklist (Kozlov et al. 2000) several The first regional checklist of moths and butter- Russian scientists published information on flies of the Kola Peninsula (Kozlov & Jalava moths and butterflies of the Murmansk region 1994) included 585 species, one of which (Coleo- (Mozolevskaya 1999, Shutova et al. 1999, Gor- phora betulaenanae Klimesch) is now consid- bunov 2001, Sviridov & Shutova 2002, Shutova ered the junior synonym of another (C. vacci- 2004, 2008, Makarova 2005, Kataev & Berlina niella). Additions reported in our earlier papers 2006, Mitina & Kuznetsova 2006, Sviridov et al. (Kozlov et al. 2000, Kozlov & Kullberg 2006, 2006, Lvovsky & Morgun 2007). Finally, the cat- 2008) increased this regional fauna to 690 spe- alogue of moths and butterflies of Russia (Sinev cies. Sampling of moths and butterflies around 2008; note that although for the sake of brevity the towns of Apatity, Monchegorsk and Nikel, we refer to the entire Catalogue, the primary re- the use of light traps in several localities, and col- sponsibility for the correctness of the information lecting trips to remote areas of the Kola Peninsula is hold by the authors of each specific part of it) substantially expanded our knowledge on the re- included records of 51 species (six of which are gional fauna, justifying the need to summarize the labelled as questionable) that have not been re- records made during the past decade. ported for Murmansk region in our earlier publi- ENTOMOL. FENNICA Vol. 21 • Lepidoptera of Kola Peninsula 255 cations. Most of these publications are hard to ac- 3. List of species cess for researchers outside Russia; furthermore, some of the published data should be used with Micropterigidae caution. Therefore we critically revise these pub- Micropterix mansuetella Z. 118: 2 exx. 10.7. lications and provide either supporting informa- 2009. Was known only from 43-29 (Kozlov & tion or justification for excluding the records Jalava 1994). from the regional species list. Hepialidae Hepialus ganna (Hb.). 46 (road to Raswumchorr, 600 m a.s.l.): 1 ex. 11.8.2004. All previous re- 2. Material and methods cords (Kozlov & Jalava 1994) were more than 50 years old. The paper is based on the examination of nearly Nepticulidae 22,000 specimens, of which about 4,600 were °Stigmella confusella (Wood & Wlsm.). 38-11, pinned. The materials are mostly deposited in the 38-1, 43-14, 43-29, 84 (Shutova et al. 1999): Zoological Museum, University of Helsinki mines on . (MZH). Some specimens of Geometridae were °Stigmella luteella (Stt.). 38-11: 1 mine on birch donated to the Zoological Museum in St. Peters- 26.8.2009; 61 (Shutova 2008). burg (ZIN), and samples of 2009 were partially Stigmella salicis (Stt.). 43-29: 1 ex. 4.7.2000; 56: donated to the Natural History Museum (NHM) 1 ex. 11.7.2000; 109-40: 1 ex. 30.6.2003. Was in London. known from 39 and 61 (Kozlov & Jalava We continue to use numeric codes for the lo- 1994); the finding in 109-40 extends the distri- calities (Table 1) as in our earlier papers (Kozlov bution limit some 100 km towards north. & Jalava 1994, Kozlov et al. 2000, Kozlov & Ectoedemia weaveri (Stt.). 44, 55, 56: over 50 Kullberg 2006, 2008), adding new localities to exx. collected by light traps (LThereafter) dur- the end of the list (numbers 109–126). The UTM ing 1999–2001. grid for the Kola Peninsula and a map showing Ectoedemia minimella (Zett.). 38-15, 38-11, 38- sampling localities 1 to 79 was published by 1, 43-7, 43-9, 43-14, 43-20, 43-29, 43-35, 55. Kozlov & Jalava (1994). Biogeographical pro- This species, earlier known only from 26 vinces of Finland are given in italics; for a map of (Kozlov et al. 2000), appeared widely distrib- the provinces, consult Kullberg et al. (2002). uted in central part of the Kola Peninsula. Its In the following list, an asterisk (*) denotes density was especially high in 2009, when nu- species that have not yet been recorded from the merous mines were observed on Betula Kola Peninsula. A degree sign (°) indicates spe- pubescens in most of study sites between 38- cies that have been reported by the Russian re- 15 and 43-35. searchers but were not mentioned in our earlier Adelidae papers (Kozlov & Jalava 1994, Kozlov et al. Adela cuprella (Den. & Schiff.). 39-15: 1 ex. 2000, Kozlov & Kullberg 2006, 2008). An excla- 21.6.2004; 43-20: 1 ex. 11.6.2001, feeding on mation mark (!) indicates records that confirm the inflorescence of Salix borealis at approx. 7 occurrence of species that have been included in pm. our first list (Kozlov & Jalava 1994) on the basis Incurvariidae of earlier publications only. Records of other spe- Incurvaria pectinea Hw. 43-35: 1 ex. 21.6.2008. cies (mostly so-called “micros”) are reported Was known from 37 and 55 (Kozlov & Jalava only when they confirm very old records of rare 1994). species or indicate interesting ecological patterns, Prodoxidae such as mass occurrence of formerly uncommon °Lampronia capitella (Cl.). 60 (Shutova 2008). species, or gradual spreading of species towards °Lampronia corticella (L.). 126: 1 ex. 4.7.2003 the north. (Sinev 2008). Tineidae °Infurcitinea ignicomella (H.-S.). 44: 3 exx. 24.– 26.7.1977 (Sinev 2008, and pers. comm.), 1 256 Kozlov & Kullberg • ENTOMOL. FENNICA Vol. 21

Table 1. The collecting localities mentioned in the text.*

No Locality name Latitude Longitude No Locality name Latitude Longitude (N) (E) (N) (E)

9 Salmijärvi 69°27’ 30°08’ 68 Turij, 20 km E Umba 66E33’ 34E35’ 10 Yläluostari 69°25’ 30°06’ 70 45 km E Umba 66E30’ 35E10’ 11 Zapolyarnyy 69°26’ 30°49’ 71 Olenitsa 66E28’ 35E20’ 12 Petsamo 69°33’ 31°13’ 73 Kashkarantsy 66E21’ 36E00’ 17 Pasvik (=Paatsjoki) 69°20’ 29°42’ 74 Varzuga 66E24’ 36E35’ 18 Nautsi 69°00’ 29°03’ 77 Kuzomen 66E18’ 36E46’ 20 Höyhenjärvi 69°10’ 29°18’ 82 Luvenga Archipelago – – 23 Murmansk 68°57’ 33E05’ 82-BV Berezhnoy Vlasov Is. 67°05’04” 32°41’33” 27 Köngäs 68E35’ 29E28’ 83 Northern Archipelago – – 28 Lutto – – 83-BL Lomnishnyi Bolshoj Is. 66°58’14” 32°37’35” 34 Voronja r. – – 83-DE Devichja Luda 66°59’20” 32°36’33” 38-1 Road St. Petersburg– 67E56’04” 32E49’08” 83-RJ Rjashkov Is. 67°02’56” 32°33’37” Murmansk, 1 km N of 39 83-TS Tsentralnaja Luda 67°03’10” 32°35’52” 38-3 id., 3 km N of 39 67E57’11” 32E50’46” 84 Porya Guba 66°48’ 33E43’ 38-11 id., 11 km N of 39 68E00’59” 32E57’03” 84-GO Gorelyi Is. 66E25’48” 33E46’27” 38-15 id., 15 km N of 39 68E02’20” 33E00’53” 85-VE Velikyi Is. 66E33’57” 33E20’00” 39 Monchegorsk 67E56’ 32E56’ 89 mouth of Makeevskij R. 66E11’22” 37E24’16” 43-5 Road St. Petersburg– 67E52’59” 32E46’40” 91 mouth of Rombach R. 66E05’31” 37E53’27” Murmansk, 5 km S of 39 92 8 km W Tetrino 66E04’56" 38E03’38" 43-7 id., 7 km S of 39 67E51’58” 32E47’50” 93 mouth of Kamenka R. 66E03’47” 38E19’54” 43-9 id., 9 km S of 39 67E51’01” 32E48’10” 95 2 km N Chapoma 66E06’54’ 38E51’18” 43-11 id., 11 km S of 39 67E49’44” 32E46’59” 100 mouth of Pulonga R. 66E15’57” 39E58’17” 43-14 id., 14 km S of 39 67E48’03” 32E46’56” 103 50 km E Murmansk 68E53’ 34E24’ 43-20 id., 20 km S of 39 67E45’31” 32E48’29” 109 Nikel 69E25’ 30E13’ 43-29 id., 29 km S of 39 67E40’39” 32E49’27” 109-3 3 km S Nikel 69E23’32” 30E10’45” 43-35 id., 35 km S of 39 67E38’21” 32E45’00” 109-10 10 km S Nikel 69E21’15” 30E03’11” 43-41 id., 41 km S of 39 67E34’38” 32E32’54” 109-20 20 km S Nikel 69E16’14” 30E04’56” 43-47 id., 47 km S of 39 67E34’46” 33E35’22” 109-40 40 km S Nikel 69E04’28” 30E12’15” 44 Tshunosero 67E39’06” 32E38’51” 110-4 4 km NE Zapolyarnyy 69E25’30” 30E52’45” 44a Tshuna-tundra mts. – – 110-10 10 km NE Zapolyarnyy 69E26’50” 31E02’10” 45 Jokostrov (Ekostroff) 67E33’52" 33E04’26" 110-40 40 km E Zapolyarnyy 69E26’34” 31E56’42” 46 Khibiny mt. (Hiipinä) – – 111 4 km E of Ura-Guba 69E17’ 32E53’ 47 Revda 67E57’ 34E34’ 112 Sem Ostrovov – – 55 Apatity 67E35’ 32E23’ 113 45 km W Lovozero 68E05’ 34E08’ 56 Kirovsk 67E38’ 33E42’ 114 Azimouth River 67E50’29" 34E22’21” 56a 15 km E Kirovsk 67E32’16” 33E57’52” 115 Khibiny (railway station) 67E40’20” 33E14’58” 58a Vuorijarvi 66E47’ 30E08’ 116 Nizhnij Tsagjavr 67E34’ 35E08’ 59 Alakurtti 66E58’ 30E21’ 117 Inga (abandoned) 67E09’33” 34E21’52” 59a 35 km W Kandalaksha 67E06’ 31E37’ 118 Muna (abandoned) 67E05’29” 34E26’28” 60 Kandalaksha 67E10’ 32E25’ 119 Vostochnoe Munozero 67E01’13” 34E47’48” 61 Luvenga 67E07’ 32E42’ 120 Rouksa River 67E00’48" 35E11’01” 62 Knyazhaya Guba 66E49’ 32E21’ 121 110 km SE Apatity 66E59’13” 35E24’34” 64 Kanosero 67E02’ 34E04’ 122 Indel 66E57’49" 35E16’49” 64a Kolvitsa 67E05’ 33E00’ 123 Tominga tributary 67E04’14” 35E20’20” 65 Ponoi 67E05’ 41E07’ 124 25 km E Kandalaksha 67E07’ 32E54’ 66 Kovda (Kouta) 66E41’ 32E52’ 125 Salnitsa 66E22’35” 35E41’28” 67 Umba 66E42’ 34E19’ 126 Lodochnyi 66E17’35” 36E24’48”

*Geographical co-ordinates were rounded off to minutes when the sampled area exceeded 1 km2 or when the extent of the his- torical sampling area cannot be recovered. Co-ordinates are not provided when the locality name refers to an area exceeding 100 km2. ENTOMOL. FENNICA Vol. 21 • Lepidoptera of Kola Peninsula 257

ex. 21.6.2000, 6 exx. 19.–27.7.2001 (LT). Yponomeutidae *Nemapogon variatellus (Clem.). 43-5: 1 ex. *Kessleria fasciapennella (Stt.). 73: 1 ex. 7.6. 14.7.2004. The northernmost records in Fin- 2003. The northernmost records in Finland land from Kb and Om (Kullberg et al. 2010). from Le and Li (Kullberg et al. 2010). Nemapogon picarellus (Cl.). 56: 1 ex. 16.7.2001 abdominalis Z. 55: 1 ex. 21.7.1999 (LT). Was known only from the north-western (LT). Was known only from 44 (Kozlov & part of the Murmansk region (Kozlov & Jalava Jalava 1994). 1994). °Argyresthia aurulentella Stt. 61 (Shutova et al. *Tinea steueri Petersen. 55: 1 ex. 27.6.2006. The 1999). northernmost records in Finland from Oa and *Argyresthia brockeella (Hb.). 74: 1 ex. 3.8.2005 Kb (Kullberg et al. 2010). (LT). The northernmost records in Finland °Tinea trinotella Thnbg. 83-RJ (Shutova et al. from Oba and Obb (Kullberg et al. 2010). 1999). Ypsolophidae Niditinea striolella (Matsum.). 55: 1 ex. 27.6. Ypsolopha parenthesella (L.). 38-1, 43-7, 43-9, 2006; 74: 1 ex. 19.7.2007. Was known only 43-29, 43-35, 44, 55, 56, 74: over 90 exx. col- from 38-11 (Kozlov et al. 2000). lected during 2000–2008. This species was °Niditinea fuscella (L.). 61 (Shutova et al. 1999); earlier (1994–1998) known only from 61 we have examined the photography of this (Shutova et al. 1999, Kozlov et al. 2000). specimen. Since then, it expanded to the central part of Psychidae the Kola Peninsula where attained high densi- Taleporia borealis (Wck.). 109-40: 1 ex. 30.6. ties, causing substantial damage of mountain 2003; 121: 1 ex. 10.–12.7.2009. Was known birch around Monchegorsk in 2006. from 12, 34 (Valle 1933), and 44a (Kozlov et Lyonetiidae al. 2000). !Lyonetia ledi Wck. 56: 1 ex. 29.8.2000 (LT). Was reported from 28 (Krogerus 1943) and *Sideria rupicolella (Sauter). 45: 1 ex. 26.6.1999 85-VE (Shutova 2004). (LT). The northernmost records in Finland from Lkor and Li (Kullberg et al. 2010). * conterminella (Z.). 56: 1 ex. Roesslerstammiidae 9.8.2000 (LT). The northernmost record in Roesslerstammia erxlebella (F.). 56a: 1 ex. 27.6. Finland from Lkoc (Kullberg et al. 2010). 2004; 61 (Shutova 2008). Was known only *Agonopterix angelicella (Hb.). 74: 1 ex. 8.– from 55 (Kozlov & Jalava 1994). 9.2006 (LT). The northernmost records in Fin- land from Oba and Obb (Kullberg et al. 2010). Bucculatrix cristatella Z. 43-5: 1 ex. 14.7.2004; Agonopterix broennoeensis (Strand). 44: 1 ex. 44: 1 ex. 21.6.2000. Was known from 56, 60 16.9.2001 (LT); 45: 2 exx. 14.–23.8.1999 (Kozlov & Jalava 1994) and 61 (Shutova (LT); 55: 1 ex. 18.8.1999, 2 exx. 29.8.–8.9. 2004; as Bucculatrix cydoniella Hbn.). 2000 (LT), 3 exx. 16.–27.8.2001 (LT); 61 (Shutova 2008). Was known only from 46 ° suberinella (Tengstr.). 43-29: 1 ex. (Kozlov & Jalava 1994). This species is very 22.6.2000, 2 exx. 22.7.2006 (ex l. on birch); 61 similar to A. kaekeritziana, and has been some- (Shutova 2004). times confused with it (see below). Caloptilia elongella (L.). 55: 4 exx. 18.9.– °Agonopterix kaekeritziana (L.). 61 (Shutova 2.10.2000 (LT). The northernmost record; was 2008); we have examined a photograph of this known only from 84-GO (Kozlov et al. 2000). specimen; the identification was confirmed by !Caloptilia stigmatella (F.). 55: 1 ex. 19.7.2001 A. Lvovsky (pers. comm.). Earlier records by (LT). Was reported from 28 (Krogerus 1943). Lvovsky (1988) and Sinev (2008) were based °Gracillaria syringella (F.). 55: numerous mines on the specimen from 46 that was identified by on Syringa josikaea in late July of 2010. Was J. Jalava as A. broennoeensis (A. Lvovsky, reported from 23 (Mitina & Kuznetsova pers. comm.), cited above. 2006). diederichsiella E. Hering. 61 (Shutova 258 Kozlov & Kullberg • ENTOMOL. FENNICA Vol. 21

2004); 111 (grassland along the Barents Sea 21.8.2006 (V.Anikin, pers. comm). The north- shore): 3 exx. 16.7.2006. Was known only ernmost record; was known only from 58a from 77 (Kozlov & Jalava 1994). (Kozlov & Jalava 1994). Elachista nobilella Z. 43-29: 1 ex. 28.6.1999; 44: ° sternipennella (Zett.). 61, 83-TS 1 ex. 10.7.2000 (LT); 45: 1 ex. 10.7.1999 (LT); (Shutova et al. 1999). 55: 4 exx. 7.–14.7.1999, 1 ex. 10.7.2000 (LT); Coleophora atriplicis Meyr. 61: 1 ex. 21.6.2003; 70: 1 ex. 29.6.2000. Was known only from 43- 68: 1 ex. 25.6.2003. Was known from 60 (col- 14 (Kozlov & Jalava 1994). lected in 1870) and 93 (Kozlov & Jalava 1994, °Elachista pomerana Frey. 61 (Shutova 2004, Kozlov & Kullberg 2006). The species is com- Sinev 2008). mon on the littoral of the White Sea, as indi- ° lathamella T. Fletcher. 43-7: 1 ex. cated by sampling at Chupa and Kartesh Island 9.7.2002 (Sinev 2008). in Northern Karelia (A. Przhiboro, pers. Oecophoridae comm.). *Denisia obscurella (Brandt). 110-10: 1 ex. Coleophora pappiferella Hofm. 77: 1 ex. 29.6.2003. The northernmost record in Fin- 23.6.1999; 125: 4 exx. 22.6.1999. Was known land from Li (Kullberg et al. 2010). from 28 and 55 (Kozlov & Jalava 1994). Momphidae Coleophora trochilella (Dup.). 44: 1 ex. Mompha sturnipennella (Tr.). 38-1: 1 ex. 9.7. 10.7.2001 (LT). Was known from 55 and 100 2003, 1 ex. 24.6.2004, 1 ex. 14.7.2004, 1 ex. (Kozlov & Jalava 1994, Kozlov & Kullberg 23.6.2005, 4 exx. 8.7.2006. Moths were dis- 2006). turbed at day time from fireweed, Chamae- Coleophora paripennella Z. 55: 1 ex. 7.7.2001 nerion angustifolium (L.) Holub, densely (LT); 109: 1 ex. 30.6.2003. A single specimen growing in heavily polluted industrial barren. was collected from 10 in 1938 (Kozlov & Was known from 60 (Shutova 2004, as M. Jalava 1994). nodicolella Fuchs) and 93 (Kozlov & Kullberg °Coleophora alcyonipennella (Koll.). 61 2006). (Shutova et al. 1999); 122: 3 exx. 11.7.2009. *Coleophora alnifoliae Barasch. 74: 1 ex. 26.6– 3.7.2004 (LT); 116: 1 ex. 9.7.2006. The north- Bryotropha similis (Stt.). 45: 1 ex. 26.6.1999 ernmost record in Finland from Oba (Kullberg (LT); 55: 1 ex. 30.6.2000 (LT); 68: 1 ex. 28.6. et al. 2010). 2000. Was known from 61 and 70 (Kozlov & *Coleophora plumbella Kanerva. 118: 1 ex. Jalava 1994). 10.7.2009. Found in all provinces of northern velocella (Z.). 55: 1 ex. 16.8.2001 (LT). Finland (Kullberg et al. 2010). Was known from 60 and 67 (Kozlov & Jalava !Coleophora vitisella Gregson. 109-3: 1 ex. 4.7. 1994). 2007; 109-10: 1 ex. 4.7.2007. Was recorded *Filatima incomptella (H.-S.). 43-29: 1 ex. from 17 (Valle1933) and 27 (Krogerus 1943). 14.7.2004; 68: 1 ex. 27.6.2002; 109-20: 1 ex. Coleophora thulea Johansson. 116: 2 exx. 7.7.2004. The northernmost records in Finland 9.7.2006; 120: 1 ex. 10.7.2009. Was known from Le and Li (Kullberg et al. 2010). from 34, 61 and 103 (Kozlov & Jalava 1994, ° herbichii (Nowicki). 43-35: 1 Kozlov & Kullberg 2008). ex. 24.6.2004. Reported for the Murmansk re- °Coleophora deauratella Lienig & Z. 61 gion (Sinev 2008) after Povolný (2002); we (Shutova et al. 1999); 118: 1 ex. 10.7.2009. were unable to identify the primary source for *Coleophora albidella (Den. & Schiff.). 110-40: this record. 1 ex. 6.2006, larval case on Salix sp. Found in Gnorimoschema epithymellum (Stgr.). 55: 2 exx. all provinces of Finland (Kullberg et al. 2010). 6.8.2001 (LT); 74: 1 ex. 27.7.2004 (LT). Was Coleophora antennariella (H.-S.). 43-35: 1 ex. known from 61 (Shutova et al. 1999) and 93 8.7.2006. Was known only from 59a (Kozlov (Kozlov & Kullberg 2006). & Jalava 1994). Scrobipalpa atriplicella (F. v. R.). 68: 3 exx. Coleophora otidipennella (Hb.). 46: 1 ex. 28.6.2000. Was known from 77 (Kozlov & ENTOMOL. FENNICA Vol. 21 • Lepidoptera of Kola Peninsula 259

Jalava 1994), 93 and 100 (Kozlov & Kullberg small lake. Was known only from 56 (Kozlov 2006). & Jalava 1994). *Scrobipalpa samadensis (Pfaff.). 68: 1 ex. * effractana (Hb.). 55: 7 exx. 29.8.– 28.6.2000. A coastal species living on Planta- 8.9.2000 (LT); 74: 1 ex. 8.–9.2006 (LT). This go maritima; the northernmost record in Fin- species had long been considered a synonym land from Oba (Kullberg et al. 2010). Also of A. emargana (F.), and its identity was re- found in Northern Karelia (Nilmoguba, 2 exx. vealed only recently (Karsholt et al. 2005). 14.7.2000). Earlier records of A. emargana from 55 and 61 ° pullatellum (Tngstr.). 61 (Shutova (Kozlov et al. 2000) should be attributed to et al. 1999); 74: 2 exx. 27.7.–15.8.2004 (LT). this species. *Caryocolum blandelloides Karsholt. 61: 1 ex. Acleris aspersana (Hb.). 44: 7 exx. 29.8.2000 18.8.2005. The specimen was reported by (LT); 55: 8 exx. 19.8.2000 (LT); 56: 1 ex. 29.8. Shutova (2008) as C. blandellum (Dougl.); our 2000 (LT); 84 (Shutova et al. 1999, as A. identification is based on a photograph of the shepherdana). Was known only from 10 male genitalia. The species inhabits dry mead- (Kozlov & Jalava 1994). ows; it is considered endangered and probably *Acleris hastiana (L.). 74: 5 exx. 28.9.2004 (LT). overlooked in Finland where it is known from The northernmost records in Finland from three localities in the provinces Al, Ab,andN Lkoc and Lkor (Kullberg et al. 2010). (Kullberg et al. 2010). The foodplant is °Acleris notana (Don.). 44: 1 ex. 29.8.2000, 1 ex. Cerastium semidecandrum, possibly also C. 16.9.2001 (LT); 56: 1 ex. 29.8.2000 (LT). Re- fontanum. ported for the Murmansk region by Sinev Syncopacma karvoneni (Hackman). 34: 1 ex. (2008); however, the source of information 1.7.2006; 45: 1 ex. 10.7.1999 (LT); 55: 3 exx. cannot be recovered (S. Sinev, pers. comm.). 7.7.1999 (LT). Was known from 61 and 68 °Acleris logiana (Cl.). 61 (Shutova 2008). (Kozlov & Jalava 1994). *Acleris lipsiana (Den. & Schiff.). 43-29: 1 ex. °Hypatima rhomboidella (L.). 61 (Shutova 12.6.2002; 74: 1 ex. 28.9.2004 (LT). Recorded 2008). in all provinces of Finland (Kullberg et al. !Neofaculta ericetella (Geyer). 68: 2 exx. 2010). 27.6.2002. Was reported from 28 (Krogerus °Phtheochroa inopiana (Hw.). 55: 1 ex. 16.8. 1943). 2001 (LT). Reported for the Murmansk region Sesiidae by Sinev (2008); however, the source of infor- Sesia bembeciformis (Hb.). 38-1: 1 ex. 10.7. mation cannot be recovered (S. Sinev, pers. 2002; 38-3: 1 ex. 23.7.1997; 43-5: 1 ex. 21.7. comm.). 1997, 1 ex. 8.7.2006; 43-9: 1 ex. 14.8.1996. Aethes rutilana (Hb.). 55: 1 ex. 20.7.2000. Was These records confirm that this rare species, known only from 70 (Kozlov & Jalava 1994). originally found in an industrial barren at 43-7 Exapate congelatella (Cl.). 55: 1 ex. Apatity (Kozlov & Jalava 1994), is relatively common 28.9.2000 (LT); 74: 1 ex. 28.9.2004 (LT). Was across the severely polluted area near the known only from 61 (Kozlov et al. 2000). nickel-copper smelter at Monchegorsk. Eana penziana (Thnbg.). 44: 1 ex. 19.8.2000, 1 !Synanthedon spheciformis (Den. & Schiff). 38- ex. 14.8.2001 (LT); 55: 1 ex. 4.8.1999, 1 ex. 1: 1 ex. 6.7.2005, flying among bushes 29.8.2000 (LT). Was known from 61 (Shutova (Salix borealis, S. caprea) in an industrial bar- 2004) and 73 (Kozlov & Jalava 1994). ren. Was reported from 27 (Krogerus 1943). Pandemis cerasana (Hb.). 38-1: 1 ex. 8.7.2006. Synanthedon polaris (Stgr.). 38-1: 1 ex. 6.7.2005, Was known only from 61 (Kozlov & Jalava together with the previous species. Was known 1994). from 91 and 92 (Kozlov & Kullberg 2006). *Lobesia virulenta Bae & Komai. 116: 1 ex. 9.7.2006. The northernmost records in Finland Acleris comariana (Lienig & Z.). 44: 5 exx. from Obb and Ks (Kullberg et al. 2010). 29.8.–8.9.2000 (LT); 45: 1 ex. 20.8.2008, ° dimidiana (Cl.). Reported for the Mur- common among Menyanthes trifoliata in a mansk region by Sinev (2008); however, the 260 Kozlov & Kullberg • ENTOMOL. FENNICA Vol. 21

source of information cannot be recovered (S. only from 61 (Kozlov et al. 2000). Sinev, pers. comm.). ° ramella (L.). 38-1: 1 ex. 31.7.2006; 56: * capreana (Hb.). 74: 1 ex. 8.–9.2006 1 ex. 27.8.2001 (LT); 61 (Shutova 2008). (LT). The northernmost records in Finland *Epinotia immundana (F. v. R.). 34: 1 ex. from Oba and Obb (Kullberg et al. 2010). 3.7.2006. The northernmost record in Finland Apotomis fraterculana Krog. 43-29: 1 ex. from Li (Kullberg et al. 2010). 25.6.2001; 110-4: 1 ex. 29.6.2003. The local- Epinotia nisella (Cl.). 38-1: 2 exx. 23.7.2000; 43- ity 110-4 is only some 30 km east from 9 where 7: 2 exx. 23.7.2000; 44: 2 exx. 18.9.2000 (LT); one of the syntypes of this rarely sampled spe- 55: 7 exx. 29.8.2000 (LT); 56: 1 ex. 29.8.2000 cies had been collected. (LT). Was known from 38-1 (erroneously re- Ancylis laetana (F.). 38-1, 43-5, 43-7, 43-9: 29 ferredtoas39byKozlovet al. 2000) and 61 exx. The single specimen was collected from (Shutova 2004). 67 in 1885 (Kozlov & Jalava 1994); later Epinotia crenana (Hb.). 55: 1 ex. 18.9.2000 (LT). found in 83-DE (Shutova et al. 1999) and 85- Was known only from 10 (Kozlov & Jalava VE (Shutova 2004). In 2001, a population was 1994). discovered in 38-1, in an aspen grove in an in- *Epinotia tenerana (Den. & Schiff.). 46: 1 ex. dustrial barren near Monchegorsk. This local- 2.8.1921. This specimen served as the basis for ity was surveyed annually since 1993, thus the the erroneous record (Sinev 2008) of date of establishment can be reported with suf- Pelochrista modicana (Z.) from the Mur- ficient accuracy. During 2004–2006 it was mansk region (S. Nedoshivina, pers. comm.). also collected in barren localities 43-5, 43-7 The northernmost records in Finland from Le and 43-9. and Li (Kullberg et al. 2010). Ancylis diminutana (Hw.). 56: 1 ex. 7.7.2001 °Zeiraphera ratzeburgiana (Saxesen). 61 (LT); 109-40: 1 ex. 30.6.2003. Was known (Shutova 2008). only from 100 (Kozlov & Kullberg 2006). *Zeiraphera isertana (F.). 43-35: 1 ex. *Ancylis paludana (Barret). 77 (sandy sea shore 24.7.2001. The northernmost record in Fin- at the mouth of Varzuga River): 1 ex. land from Oba (Kullberg et al. 2010). 29.6.2004. In Finland known only from mari- *Eucosma saussureana (Ben.). 43-9: 1 ex. time localities in Ab, N, Om, Oba and Obb 21.6.2000; 68: 2 exx. 29.6.2000; 126: 2 exx. (Kullberg et al. 2010), mostly associated with 29.6.2000. In Finland recorded only from Lathyrus japonicus. Obb, Ks, Lkoc,andLkor (Kullberg et al. °Thiodia citrana (Hb.). Reported for the Mur- 2010). mansk region by Sinev (2008); however, the cirsiana (Z.). 43-35: 1 ex. 27.6.2006. source of information cannot be recovered (S. Was known only from 55 (Kozlov & Jalava Sinev, pers. comm.). 1994). °Spilonota ocellana (Den. & Schiff.). 46: 1 ex. Coccyx posticana (Zett.). 43-5: 1 ex. 4.7.2001. 8.7.1934 (Sinev 2008, and pers. comm.). An Was known from 12 and 67 (Kozlov & Jalava unexpected record that was published by 1994). Kuznetsov (1978) but overlooked by Kozlov nigricana (F.). 117: 1 ex. 10.7.2009. This & Jalava (1994); in Finland this aspen record extends the northern limit of this spe- ( tremula) feeding species is confined cies, which was known only from 89 (Kozlov to the southern provinces (Kullberg et al. & Kullberg 2006). 2010). *Cydia duplicana (Zett.). 43-5: 1 ex. 24.6.2004; °Epinotia caprana (F.). 61 (Shutova 2004). 55: 1 ex. 20.7.2000 (LT); 56: 2 exx. 27.6.– Epinotia solandriana (L.). 44: 2 exx. 8.– 7.7.2001 (LT). The northernmost record in 18.9.2000 (LT); 56: 2 exx. 18.–29.8.2000 Finland from Li (Kullberg et al. 2010). (LT). Was known only from 61 (Kozlov et al. *Cydia cognatana (Barret). 109-10: 1 ex. 2000). 6.7.2004. The northernmost records in Finland Epinotia brunnichana (L.). 38-1: 1 ex. from Le and Li (Kullberg et al. 2010). 28.7.2005; 38-11: 1 ex. 21.8.2008. Was known *Cydia cornucopiae (Tengstr.). 38-1: 1 ex. ENTOMOL. FENNICA Vol. 21 • Lepidoptera of Kola Peninsula 261

22.6.2006. The northernmost record in Fin- known from the White Sea shore and mouth of land from Obb (Kullberg et al. 2010). the Ponoi River (Kozlov & Jalava 1994) °Grapholitha tenebrosana (Dup.). 61 (Shutova !Chrysoteuchia culmella (L.). 43-35: 5 exx. 2008); we have examined a photograph of this 27.6.2006; 68: 1 ex. 27.6.2002; 74: 1 ex. specimen. 4.7.2003, 1 ex. 29.6.2004 (LT); 82-BV °Lathronympha strigana (F.). 61 (Shutova 2008); (Shutova 2004); 118: 1 ex. 10.7.2009; 121: 4 71: 1 ex. 20.7.2004. exx. 10.–12.7.2009. Was reported from 28 *Pammene obscurana (Steph.). 71: 2 exx. (Krogerus 1943). 20.7.2004; 74: 1 ex. 4.7.2003. The northern- heringiellus H.-S. 121: 1 exx. 10.– most records in Finland from Oba and Obb 12.7.2009. The northernmost record; was (Kullberg et al. 2010). known only from 95 (Kozlov & Kullberg °Dichrorampha vancouverana (McD.). 61 2006). Record from 82 (Shutova et al. 1999) (Shutova 2008, as D. gueneeana). withdrawn by Shutova (2004). *Dichrorampha petiverella (L.). 43-5: 1 ex. °Elophila nymphaeata (L.). 85-VE (Shutova et 24.6.2005. The northernmost record in Fin- al. 1999). land from Ok (Kullberg et al. 2010). ° aenealis (Den. & Schiff.). 83-BL Choreutidae (Shutova et al. 1999). °Choreutis diana (Hb.). 38-1: 1 ex. 28.7.2005; *Udea prunalis (Den. & Schiff.). 113: 1 ex. 43-29: 1 ex. 22.7.2006 (ex l. on birch, Betula 8.7.2000. The northernmost records in Finland pubescens); 46: 12 exx. 1931–1932 (Sinev from Obb and Ks (Kullberg et al. 2010). 2008, and pers. comm.). *Sitochroa verticalis (L.). 71: 1 ex. 20.7.2004. Epermeniidae The northernmost record in Finland from Kb *Phaulernis dentella (Z.). 114: 1 ex. 8.7.1999. (Kullberg et al. 2010). The northernmost records in Finland from Kb *Pleuroptya ruralis (Scop.). 44: 4 exx. 6.– and Om (Kullberg et al. 2010). 16.9.2001 (LT); 55: 3 exx. 16.8.2001 (LT); 56: 2 exx. 16.–27.8.2001 (LT); 60, 61 (Shutova *Platyptilia gonodactyla (Den. & Schiff.). 56: 2 2008, as Paratalanta hyalinalis); 74: 8 exx. exx. 11.–31.7.2000 (LT). Record from 83 31.8.–14.9.2004 (LT). The northernmost re- (Shutova et al. 1999) is based on an erroneous cord in Finland from Le (Kullberg et al. 2010). determination; it was withdrawn by the author Lasiocampidae (Shutova 2004). The record by Sinev (2008) is !Eriogaster lanestris (L). 43-14, 43-41: larval based on specimens collected from Northern nests on birch ()inlatesum- Karelia (V. Kovtunovich, pers. comm.). The mer of 2005; 44 and Salnye tundry (Kataev & northernmost records in Finland from Lkor Berlina 2006); 83, 84 (Shutova et al. 1999, and Li (Kullberg et al. 2010). Shutova 2004). Earlier records from 9, 18 and Stenoptilia veronicae Karv. 55: 2 exx. 19.– 20 were made 50–80 years ago (Valle 1933, 29.8.2000 (LT). The northernmost record; was Nordström et al. 1961, Heath & Leclercq known only from the White Sea shore (Kozlov 1981). et al. 2000). Saturniidae * didactyla (L.). 44: 1 ex. 21.7.2000 (LT); Saturnia pavonia (L.). 43-9: 1 ex. 15.6.2004. In- 56: 1 ex. 31.7.2000 (LT). The northernmost re- terestingly, the population discovered in the cords in Finland from Ok and Oba (Kullberg et early 1990s (Kozlov & Jalava 1994) still per- al. 2010). sists here, although the locality was gradually transformed from birch woodland into indus- °Ortholepis betulae (Goeze). 67 (Shutova 2004). trial barren due to severe pollution impact. terebrella (Zinck.). 74: 2 exx. 21.7.– Sphingidae 3.8.2004 (LT). Was known only from 43-29 °Sphinx pinastri L. 68, 85-VE (Shutova et al. (Kozlov & Jalava 1994). 1999). Agriphila straminella (Den. & Schiff.). 111: 1 ex. °Hemaris fuciformis (L.). 84-GO (Shutova 16.7.2006. The northernmost record; was 2004). 262 Kozlov & Kullberg • ENTOMOL. FENNICA Vol. 21

Papilionidae (Kozlov 1983, Kozlov & Jalava 1994). In the Papilio machaon L. 39-1, 43-9, 43-11, 43-15, 43- central part of the Kola Peninsula it was for the 47. The species was surprisingly common in first time found in a small river valley at the ex- 2001. ternal border of industrial barrens in 2003. Pieridae Since then, the species was observed almost °Pieris daplidice (L.). 61 (Shutova 2004). The re- every year, and another local population was cord of P. edusa (F.) by Sinev (2008) is likely discovered in 2006, also in industrial barren. to be based on this publication. °Coenonympha pamphilus (L.). 59: 1 ex. 11.7. °Gonepteryx rhamni (L.). 84, 85-VE (Shutova 1980. This record was published by Kozlov 2004). (1983) but overlooked by Kozlov & Jalava °Colias hecla Lefebvre. 46: 1 ex. 3.7.1959 (1994); the specimen was rediscovered by (Tuzov et al. 1997, Table 37 fig. 1). Records Lvovsky & Morgun (2007). The presence of from the northern part of the Murmansk region this species in the north-western part of the (Gorbunov 2001), which were repeated by Murmansk region was also reported by Heath Lvovsky & Morgun (2007), are based on & Leclercq (1981), but the source for this in- doubtful information (P. Gorbunov, pers. formation remains unknown. comm.). Drepanidae *Tethea or (Den. & Schiff.). 38-1: 1 ex. 8.7.2006. !Plebeius eumedon (Esp.). 43-35: 1 ex. The northernmost records in Finland from 14.7.2004; 44: 1 ex. 11.7.1990. The first re- Lkoc and Lkor (Kullberg et al. 2010). cords from the central part of the Kola Penin- Geometridae sula; was known from 59 (Nordström et al. hastulata (Hb.) 123: 1 ex. 12.7.2009. 1955), 61, 83, 84, 85-VE (Shutova et al. Was known only from two specimens col- 1999). lected long ago in 28 and 64 (Kozlov & Jalava °Plebeius argus (L.). 46: 2 exx. 15–16.7.2004 1994). (Lvovsky & Morgun 2007, and pers. comm.). °Mesoleuca albicillata (L.). 85-VE (Shutova Earlier doubtful records were discussed by 2004). Kozlov & Jalava (1994). The record by °Lampropteryx otregiata (Metcalfe). 84 (Shutova Makarova (2005) is also likely to be based on et al. 1999). an erroneous identification. *Dysstroma latefasciatum (Prout). 56: 1 ex. °Aricia artaxerxes (F.). 28: 1 ex. 6.7.1940; 115: 2 19.8.2000 (LT). The northernmost record in exx. 7.2004 (Lvovsky & Morgun 2007, and Finland from Ks (Kullberg et al. 2010). pers. comm.). The source of an earlier report * miata (L.). 74: 1 ex. 8.–9.2006 from the northern Kola Peninsula (Gorbunov (LT). The northernmost record in Finland from 2001) cannot be recovered (P. Gorbunov, pers. Ks (Kullberg et al. 2010). comm.). °Plemyria rubiginata (Den.&Schiff.).61 Nymphalidae (Shutova 2004). °Nymphalis io (L.). 61 (Shutova 2008); 126: 1 ex. *Thera firmata (Hb.) 74: 3 exx. 31.8.–14.9.2004 13.7.2006. This species is recently spreading (LT). The northernmost record in Finland from to the north: by 2000, the northernmost record Ks (Kullberg et al. 2010). in Finland was from Obb; however, since then °Thera obeliscata (Hb.). 61, 83-RJ, 83-VE the species was recorded as migrant in Ks and (Shutova et al. 1999, Shutova 2008). An ear- Li (Kullberg et al. 2010). lier record from the Kola Peninsula (Mikkola Lasiommata petropolitana (F.). 43-5: 1 ex. et al. 1989) was based on a specimen collected 22.6.2006; 43-9: 2 exx. 20.6.2003, 4 exx. in Finland, NE part of the province Lkem 6.7.2005, 7 exx. 22.6.–8.7.2006; 61: 1 ex. (Kozlov & Jalava 1994). 21.6.2003; 68: 2 exx. 29.6.2000; 81 (Shutova °Thera juniperata (L.). 61 (Shutova et al. 1999). 2004); 119: 1 ex. 10.7.2009. From the 1980s to Same as T. obeliscata. the early 1990s the species was restricted to the *Mesotype didymata (L.). 74: 4 exx. 3.–15.8. southernmost part of the Murmansk region 2004 (LT). The northernmost records in Fin- ENTOMOL. FENNICA Vol. 21 • Lepidoptera of Kola Peninsula 263

land from Lkor and Le (Kullberg et al. 2010). Notodontidae ° fennoscandica Knaben. 46: 1 ex. Clostera pigra (Hufn.). 38-1: 1 ex. 24.6.2004. 26.6.1935 (Sinev 2008; V. Mironov, pers. Was known from 46 (Fridolin 1936), 55 comm.). (Kozlov & Jalava 1994) and 61 (Shutova °Eupithecia actaeata Walderdorff. 84-GO 2004). (Shutova et al. 1999). °Notodonta torva (Hb.). 55: 1 ex. 30.6.2000 (LT); °Eupithecia assimilata Doubl. 55: 8 exx. 19.7.– 84 (Shutova 2004). 6.8.2001 (LT) (Sinev 2008). !Notodonta dromedarius (L.). 38-1: 1 ex. °Eupithecia icterata (Vill.). 82 (Shutova et al. 8.7.2006; 61 (Shutova 2004). The earlier re- 1999). cords from 6, 9 and 46 were made some 50–70 °Eupithecia succenturiata (L.). 61, 83-VE years ago (Kozlov & Jalava 1994). (Shutova 2008). Lymantriidae !Eupitecia indigata (Hb.). 43-14: 1 ex. 22.6. Orgya antiqua (L.). 66: 1 ex. 11.8.2008 ( on 2006. Was reported from 18 (Valle 1933). Rumex sp.). Was known only from 84-GO °Eupithecia nanata (Hb.). 126: 1 ex. 29.6.2000 (Kozlov et al. 2000). (Sinev 2008). !Dicallomera fascelina (L.). 39-15: 1 ex. Eupithecia veratraria arctica Viid. 56: 1 ex. 7.8.2006 (larva on Betula pubescens). The ear- 16.7.2001 (LT). Was known only from one lier record from 46 was made over 60 years specimen collected in 65 in 1899 (Kozlov & ago (Kozlov & Jalava 1994). Jalava 1994). Recently found in Northern Nor- Nolidae way (Tammaru et al. 1995). !Nola karelica Tengstr. 43-14: 1 ex. 24.7.2004; °Eupithecia tantillaria Boisd. Reported for the 61 (Shutova 2004). The earlier records from 9, Murmansk region by Sinev (2008); however, 27 and 28 were made some 50–70 years ago the source of information cannot be recovered (Kozlov & Jalava 1994). (V. Mironov, pers. comm.). Arctiidae °Pasiphila debiliata (Hb.). Reported for the Mur- °Grammia quenseli (Payk.). Reported for the mansk region by Sinev (2008); however, the Murmansk region by Sinev (2008) on the basis source of information cannot be recovered (V. of 1 specimen collected on 13.7.1928 in stony Mironov, pers. comm.). tundra between the Iokanga River and Iokanga °Trichopteryx carpinata (Borkh.). 61 (Shutova depression (V.Dubatolov, pers. comm.). Since 2008). the exact position of this locality cannot be °Odontopera bidentata (Cl.). 84-GO (Shutova et identified, we refrain from providing it with al. 1999). numerical code. Plagodis pulveraria (L.). 68: 1 ex. 29.6.2000; 112 (Shutova 2008); 124: 1 ex. 11.7.2007. Was °Rivula sericealis (Sc.). 61 (Shutova 2008); we known only from 64a (Kozlov & Jalava 1994). have examined a photograph of this specimen. °Pasiphila chloerata (Mabille). 61 (Shutova Hypenoides humidalis Doubl. 43-29: 1 ex. 24.7. 2004). 2001, 1 ex. 31.7.2006; 43-35: 1 ex. 24.7.2001, Macaria notata (L.). 38-1, 43-5, 43-7, 43-9, 43- 1 ex. 4.8.2005; 61 (Shutova 2008). Was 14, 43-29, 44, 56a, 70: total of 44 exx. col- known only from 62 (Kozlov & Jalava 1994). lected during 2001–2006. Was known only Also found in Northern Karelia (Nilmoguba, 2 from the Petsamo area (Kozlov & Jalava exx. 14.7.2000). 1994). °Hypena crassalis (F.). 61, 68 (Sviridov et al. Chiasmia clathrata (L.). 119: 1 ex. 10.7.2009. 2006); 83 (Shutova 2008). The northernmost record; was known from Callistege mi (Cl.). 68: 1 ex. 29.6.2000. Was 58a and 67 (Kozlov & Jalava 1994). known only from 84-GO (Kozlov et al. 2000). Arichanna melanaria (L.): 38-11: 1 ex. 12.8. °Deltote uncula (Cl.). 61 (Shutova 2008); we 2007. The northernmost record; was known have examined a photograph of this specimen. only from the White Sea shore (Kozlov et al. °Polychrysia moneta (F.). 61 (Sviridov & Shuto- 2000). va 2002); 74: 1 ex. 8.–9.2006 (LT). 264 Kozlov & Kullberg • ENTOMOL. FENNICA Vol. 21

°Diachrysia tutti (Kostrowicki). 60 (Shutova mansk region by Sinev (2008); however, the 2008); 61 (Sviridov et al. 2006, as D. steno- source of information cannot be recovered (A. chrysis (Warren)). Matov, pers. comm.). Plusia festucae (L.). 38-1: 1 ex. 24.7.2001. This °Lasionycta secedens (Wlk.). 83 (Shutova et al. specimen was collected in the same locality 1999). (heavily polluted industrial barren) where the °Diarsia dahlii (Hb.). 61 (Shutova 2008); we species was discovered in 1991 (Kozlov & have examined a photograph of this specimen. Jalava 1994), indicating long-term persistence Lycophotia porphyrea (Den. & Schiff.). 43-14: 1 of the population. ex. 8.7.2006. Was known only from 43-41 Autographa gamma (L.). 55: 3 exx. 29.8.– (Kozlov et al. 2000) 8.9.2000 (LT); 68: 1 ex. 29.6.2000. Was *Xestia sincera (H.-S.). 74: 1 ex. 20.7.2005 (LT); known from 9 (Valle 1933), 60, 61, 84-GO 124: 1 ex. 11.7.2007. The northernmost re- (Kozlov et al. 2000); occasional migrant. cords in Finland from Lkor and Le (Kullberg et *Autographa pulchrina (Hw.). 55: 1 ex. al. 2010). 20.7.2000 (LT). The northernmost records in °Xestia baja (Den. & Schiff.). 61 (Sviridov et al. Finland from Lkoc and Lkor (Kullberg et al. 2006); 74: 1 ex. 8.–9.2006 (LT); 83-VE 2010). (Shutova 2008). °Autographa excelsa (Kretschmar). 61, 68 °Protolampra sobrina (Dup.). 61 (Sviridov & (Sviridov et al. 2006). Shutova 2002). °Colocasia coryli (L.). 39: 2 exx. 7.8.2006 (lar- *Euxoa recussa (Hb.). 74: 2 exx. 3.–15.8.2004 vae on Betula pubescens), 2 exx. 18.8.2008 (LT). The northernmost record in Finland from (larvae on B. pubescens); 44: 1 ex. 15.8.2006 Obb (Kullberg et al. 2010). (larva on B. pubescens); 61 (Sviridov & Shutova 2002). ° cinerea (Hufn.). 84-GO (Shutova et 4. Excluded species al. 1999). °Amphipyra tragopoginis (Cl.). 60 (Sviridov et Micropterix aruncella (Scop.). Erroneously indi- al. 2006); 61 (Shutova 2008). cated for the Murmansk region (Sinev 2008); °Xanthia icteritia (Hufn.). 44: 2 exx. 14.8.– obviously a technical error. Discovery of this 16.9.2001 (LT), 1 ex. 10.8.2005, Kataev & species in the Kola Peninsula seems unlikely, Berlina (2006); 55: 1 ex. 16.8.2001 (LT); 61 because in Finland it is known only from the (Sviridov & Shutova 2002). southern provinces Al and Sa (Kullberg et al. °Agrochola circellaris (Hb.). 55: 1 ex. 28.9.2000 2010). (LT); 61 (Sviridov & Shutova 2002). Eriocrania unimaculella (Zett.). Indicated for the Apamea furva (Den. & Schiff.). 74: 1 ex. 8.–9. Murmansk region (Sinev 2008) on the basis of 2006 (LT). Was known only from 61 (Kozlov an misidentified specimen of E. salopiella. et al. 2000). Pharmacis carna (Den. & Schiff.). Mentioned Celaena haworthi (Curt.). 44: 4 exx. 29.8.– (as Hepialus uralensis Gr.-Gr.) from 46 by 8.9.2000 (LT). Was known only from 61 Fridolin (1936). This record is presumably (Kozlov et al. 2000). based on misidentification of certain forms of °Celaena leucostigma (Hb.). 61 (Sviridov & common Hepialus fusconebulosus. Shutova 2002); 74: 3 exx. 31.8.–14.9.2004 Nematopogon metaxellus (Hb.). Indicated for the (LT). Murmansk region (Sinev 2008) after Valle °Sedina pygmina (Haw.). 61 (Sviridov et al. (1933) (S. Sinev, pers. comm.). However, as 2006). we commented earlier (Kozlov & Jalava °Arenostola phragmitidis (Hb.). 61 (Sviridov et 1994), the specimen mentioned by Valle al. 2006). (1933) belongs to N. pilellus. °Mythimna pallens (L.). 61 (Sviridov & Shutova Nemapogon wolffiellus (Karsholt & Nielsen). Er- 2002). roneously indicated for the Murmansk region °Mythimna comma (L.). Reported for the Mur- (as N. wolfierella [lapsus calami]: Sinev 2008) ENTOMOL. FENNICA Vol. 21 • Lepidoptera of Kola Peninsula 265

on the basis of the catalogue by Ershoff & Swammerdammia pyrella (de Villers). Indicated Field (1870), who reported this species for the for the Murmansk region (Sinev 2008); how- Arkhangelsk Gubernia, which at that time in- ever, the source of information cannot be re- cluded also the Murmansk district (S. covered (S. Sinev, pers. comm.). Occurrence Baryshnikova, pers. comm.). However, the of this species in the Kola Peninsula seems un- only source of information on the fauna likely, because in Finland it is known from the of the Murmansk district, potentially available two southernmost provinces (Al, N) only to Ershoff and Field (1870), was the paper by (Kullberg et al. 2010). The record concerns Tengström (1869) which did not mention this most probably either S. passerella or S. caesi- species. Zagulajev (1964, fig. 87) showed the ella. northern distribution limit of this species Paraswammerdammia lutarea (Hw.). Reported within Northern Karelia; in Finland the north- from 82 (Shutova et al. 1999). Examination of ernmost records are from the provinces Lkoc a photograph demonstrated that the specimen and Ks (Kullberg et al. 2010). was misidentified and belongs to P. Trichophaga tapetzella (L.). Same as Nemapo- conspersella. In Finland, the species is con- gon wolffiellus. Record of this species (spelled fined to the southern provinces, with a recent out as T. tapetiella) from the Petsamo area record from Kb (Kullberg et al. 2010); its dis- (Valle 1933) is based on misidentification of T. covery in the Kola Peninsula seems unlikely. scandinaviella. Occurrence of T. tapetzella in forsterella (F.). Indicated for the the Kola Peninsula seems unlikely, because in Murmansk region (Sinev 2008); however, the Finland it is known from the southernmost source of information cannot be recovered (S. provinces only (Kullberg et al. 2010). Sinev, pers. comm.). Occurrence of this spe- Sideria listerella (L.). Reported from 84 (Shutova cies in Kola Peninsula seems unlikely, because et al. 1999); this record most likely served as the northernmost records in Finland are from the basis for a questionable indication for the the provinces Ok and Oba (Kullberg et al. Murmansk region (Sinev 2008). Examination 2010). of the photograph demonstrated that the speci- Agonopterix arctica (Strand). Indicated for the men is misidentified and belongs to Dahlica Murmansk region (Sinev 2008) after Valle lazuri. In Finland, the species is confined to the (1933) (A. Lvovsky, pers. comm.). However, southern provinces (Kullberg et al. 2010); its as we commented earlier (Kozlov & Jalava occurrence in the Kola Peninsula is unlikely. 1994), this identification is doubtful and we Phyllonorycter sagitellus (Bjerk.). Mozolev- found no material of this species in the collec- skaya (1999) listed this species as forming an tion of K. Valle. outbreak in the Murmansk region. In Finland, quadrillella (Goeze). Indicated for the the species is confined to the Southern provin- Murmansk region (Sinev 2008) after Duba- ces (Kullberg et al. 2010); its discovery in the tolov et al. (1997) who copied distribution data Kola Peninsula seems unlikely. (“everywhere until Khibiny mts.”) from Phyllonorycter populifoliellus (Tr.). Reported Zagulajev (1981). No specimens from the from 60 (Shutova 2004). The specimen was Murmansk region were found in the ZIN col- found inside a building; the probability of es- lection, and the origin of the information pub- tablishment of a local population is low, be- lished by Zagulajev (1981) remains unknown. cause larvae of this species feed only on culti- The northernmost record in Finland from the vated poplars. In 2010, we did not find mines province Le (Kullberg et al. 2010) is based on of this species in 55 and 60, in spite of substan- a single specimen collected in Kilpisjärvi. tial sampling effort. In Finland the northernost Ethmia pusiella (L.). Same as for E. quadrillella records are from provinces Sb and Kb (Kull- (see above). The northernmost record in Fin- berg et al. 2010). land from the province Kb (Kullberg et al. Phyllonorycter dubitellus (H.-S.). 61 (Shutova 2010). 2008). Examination of a photograph demon- Ethmia pyrausta (Pall.). Same as for E. quadril- strated that this identification is incorrect. lella (see above). In Finland recorded from the 266 Kozlov & Kullberg • ENTOMOL. FENNICA Vol. 21

provinces Al and N only (Kullberg et al. 2010). be attributed to a species. In Finland the spe- Elachista poae Stt. Indicated for the Murmansk cies is restricted to the southernmost provinces region (Sinev 2008) after Valle (1933) (S. (Kullberg et al. 2010), and its discovery in Sinev, pers. comm.). However, as we com- Murmansk seems unlikely. mented earlier (Kozlov & Jalava 1994), this pallidana (F.). Indicated for the Mur- determination is doubtful and we found no ma- mansk region (Sinev 2008); however, the terial on this species in the collection of K. source of information cannot be recovered (S. Valle. Occurrence of E. poae in the Kola Pen- Sinev, pers. comm.). Occurrence of this spe- insula seems unlikely, because its host plant, cies in the Kola Peninsula seems unlikely, be- , is absent from northern cause the northernmost record in Finland is Fennoscandia, including the entire Kola Pen- from the province Kb (Kullberg et al. 2010). insula (Hultén 1971). In Finland the species is corticana (Den. & Schiff.). Record of this known from the southernmost provinces only species (referred to as Argyroploce (Apotomis) (Kullberg et al. 2010). corticana Hb.) from the Petsamo area (Valle Mompha propinquella (Stt.). Reported from 61 1933) is based on misidentification of Loxo- (Shutova et al. 1999); record withdrawn by terma bipunctana. Shutova (2004). In Finland, the species is con- Apotomis frigidana Packard. Indicated for the fined to the southern provinces only (Kullberg Murmansk region (Sinev 2008) after Kuz- et al. 2010); most probably the record con- netsov (1978) who explicitly mentioned the cerns the superficially similar M. lacteella. occurrence of A. frigidana on the Kola Penin- Coleophora betulaenanae Klimesch. Listed by sula. No specimens of this Beringian species Kozlov & Jalava (1994) as bona species; these from the Murmansk region were found in ZIN records should be attributed to C. vacciniella. collection, and therefore the origin of the in- Caryocolum blandellum (Douglas). Reported formation used by Kuznetsov (1978) remains from 61 (Shutova 2008). Examination of a unknown. This species has not been recorded photographof this specimen demonstrated that from Finland, , or (Aarvik this is C. blandelloides. The occurrence of C. 2010). blandellum in the Kola Peninsula seems un- Pelochrista modicana (Z.). Recorded in the Mur- likely, because its host plant, Stellaria mansk region (Sinev 2008) on the basis of an holostea, is absent from northern Fennoscan- erroneous identification; the specimen ap- dia, including the entire Kola Peninsula (Hul- peared to be Epinotia tenerana (S. Nedo- tén 1971). shivina, pers. comm.). (F.). Earlier records from 55 Eucosma tripoliana (Barr.). Reported for 61 and and61(Kozlovet al. 2000) should be attrib- 84 (Shutova et al. 1999); records withdrawn uted to A. effractana (see above). by Shutova (2004). This species is absent from Acleris shepherdana (Stph.). Reported from 84 Russia and Finland, the nearest records are (Shutova et al. 1999). Examination of the pho- known from southern Sweden and tographs demonstrated that the specimens are (Aarvik 2010). misidentified and belong to A. aspersana.In Cydia pomonella (L.). 60: in a building, presum- Finland recorded from the southernmost pro- ably emerged from fruits transported from vinces N and Ka only (Kullberg et al. 2010); its southern regions (Shutova et al. 1999). Al- occurrence in the Kola Peninsula seems doubt- though apple ( domestica) trees are oc- ful. casionally grown in the Murmansk region, and Archips podanus (Sc.). Reported from 23 on the even produce small fruits, the thermal require- basis of leaves of and ments for C. pomonella (ca. 600 degree-days aucuparia with damage caused by some larvae over +10°C) do not allow this species to estab- (Mitina & Kuznetsova 2006). These authors lish local populations in the Kola Peninsula. neither reared moths, nor preserved larvae (E. Choreutis pariana (Cl.). Reported from 23 on the Mitina, pers. comm.). An obvious identifica- basis of leaves of damaged tion error, it is unlikely that such damage can by some larvae (Mitina & Kuznetsova 2006). ENTOMOL. FENNICA Vol. 21 • Lepidoptera of Kola Peninsula 267

The authors neither reared moths, nor pre- northern Karelia (V. Kovtunovich, pers. served larvae (E. Mitina, pers. comm.). An ob- comm.). This species has not been recorded vious identification error; it is unlikely that from Finland, Sweden, or Norway (Gielis such damage can be attributed to a species. In 2010); a doubtful identification. Finland the species is restricted to the south- Paratalanta hyalinalis (Hb.). Reported from 60 ernmost provinces only (Kullberg et al. 2010), and 61 (Shutova 2008). Examination of the and its discovery in Murmansk seems un- photographs demonstrated that the specimens likely. are misidentified and belong to Pleuroptya Phaulernis statariella (Heyd.). Record of this ruralis. species from the surroundings of Murmansk Zophodia grossulariella Hb. Reported from 61 (Djakonov 1911) is most likely based on mis- (Shutova et al. 1999) on the basis of an errone- identification of P. fulviguttella. ous identification; this specimen appeared to Platyptilia farfarellus Z. Erroneously indicated be Phycitodes binaevellus (Kozlov et al. for the Murmansk region (Sinev 2008) on the 2000). Record withdrawn by Shutova (2004). basis of specimens collected from northern Udea elutalis (Den. & Schiff.). Reported from Karelia (V. Kovtunovich, pers. comm.). This 83-BL (Shutova et al. 1999); record with- species has been recorded in Fennoscandia drawn by Shutova (2004). only from Denmark (Gielis 2010) and recently Euthrix potatoria (L.). Erroneously indicated for from southernmost Sweden (Gustafsson the Murmansk region (Sinev 2008) after 2010); a doubtful identification. Sviridov (1970) who referred to specimens Amblyptilia acanthadactyla (Hb.). Reported collected from northern Karelia. from 84 (Shutova et al. 1999) and, on the basis Pyrgus malvae (L.). Indicated (as a questionable of this record, listed by Sinev (2008). Al- record) for the Murmansk region (Sinev 2008) though this species is widely distributed in Eu- on the basis of extrapolation of species’ distri- rope (Gielis 2010), it was missed from the bution in Scandinavia (A. Devyatkin, pers. Finnish fauna until a very recent discovery in comm.). The northernmost records in Finland southwest Finland (Kullberg et al. 2010). Cor- are from the provinces Om and Ok (Kullberg et rectness of the identification was therefore al. 2010). questioned, and after re-examination of the Thymelicus lineola (Ochs.). Same as P. m alvae specimen E. Shutova (pers. comm.) confirmed (see above). In the Republic of Karelia it that this record concerns the very similar A. reaches 62°N latitude (Lvovsky & Morgun punctidactyla, which is common in Finland up 2007); the northernmost records in Finland are to the northernmost regions (Kullberg et al. from the provinces Ok and Oba (Kullberg et 2010). al. 2010). Hellinsia distincta (H.-S.). Indicated for the Mur- Ochlodes sylvanus (Esp.). Same as P. m alvae (see mansk region (Sinev 2008) on the basis of the above). In the Republic of Karelia it reaches ZIN collections (P.Ustjuzhanin, pers. comm.). 64°N latitude (Lvovsky & Morgun 2007); the The specimen from 46, found under this label, northernmost record in Finland is from the was identified by S. Tshetverikov as H. province Obb (Kullberg et al. 2010). tephradactyla, and we confirm this identifica- Cupido minimus (F.). Indicated for the Murmansk tion. region (Sinev 2008) after Lvovsky & Morgun Hellinsia didactylites (Ström). Indicated for the (2007) who extracted information from the Murmansk region (Sinev 2008) on the basis of distribution map published by Gorbunov the ZIN collections (P. Ustjuzhanin, pers. (2001). The reliability of this information is comm.). However, we were unable to find any doubtful, since it was received from an ama- specimen originating from the Murmansk re- teur lepidopterologist whose name cannot be gion in this collection. recovered (P. Gorbunov, pers. comm.). Al- Hellinsia chrysocomae (Rag.). Erroneously indi- though this species was once recorded from cated for the Murmansk region (Sinev 2008) the province Le in Finland (Kullberg et al. on the basis of specimens collected from 2010), and the species’ distribution reaches as 268 Kozlov & Kullberg • ENTOMOL. FENNICA Vol. 21

far north as Tromsö in Norway (Aarvik et al. Horisme aemulata (Hb.). Reported from 84-GO 2000), it is generally confined to the more (Shutova et al. 1999) on the basis of erroneous southern regions. determination; this specimen appeared to be orbitulus (Püngeler). Reported from the H. tersata (Kozlov et al. 2000). Murmansk region (Tuzov et al. 2000) on the Gynaephora selenitica (Esp.). Indicated for the basis of one specimen labelled “Lapponia”; Murmansk region (Sinev 2008); however, the this record was mentioned by Lvovsky & source of information cannot be recovered (A. Morgun (2007) and Sinev (2008). There is lit- Matov, pers. comm.). Occurrence of this spe- tle reason to believe that this label refers to the cies in the Kola Peninsula seems unlikely, be- Murmansk region; since this species had not cause in Finland it is known from the southern- been recorded from Finland, the specimen is most provinces only (Kullberg et al. 2010). likely to originate from more southerly moun- Cybosia mesomella (L.). Indicated (as a question- tain regions in Sweden or Norway. able record) for the Murmansk region (Sinev Brenthis ino (Rott.). Erroneously indicated for 2008); however, the source of information the Murmansk region (Sinev 2008) on the ba- cannot be recovered. Occurrence of this spe- sis of specimens collected from northern cies in the Kola Peninsula seems unlikely, be- Karelia (D. Morgun, pers. comm.). cause the northernmost records in Finland are from the provinces Ok and Oba (Kullberg et Boloria improba (Butl.). Indicated for the Mur- al. 2010). mansk region by Gorbunov (2001) on the ba- Arctia caja (L.). Erroneously indicated for the sis of doubtful information (see above, com- Murmansk region (Sinev 2008) on the basis of ment to Cupido minimus). a female collected in Munosero, southern Lasiommata maera (L.). Reported, on the basis of Karelia (V. Dubatolov, pers. comm.). visual observations, from 44 (Kataev & Diaphora mendica (Cl.). Erroneously indicated Berlina 2006). In Finland this species is dis- for the Murmansk region (Sinev 2008) on the tributed northwards up to the provinces Om basis of specimens collected in Munosero, and Ok (Kullberg et al. 2010); its occurrence in southern Karelia (V.Dubatolov, pers. comm.). the Kola Peninsula seems unlikely. This record Spilosoma lubricipedum (L.). Erroneously indi- is almost certainly based on an erroneous de- cated for the Murmansk region (Sinev 2008) termination of L. petropolitana. on the basis of specimens collected in Erebia polaris Stgr. Indicated for the Murmansk Munosero, southern Karelia (V. Dubatolov, region (Sinev 2008) after Lvovsky & Morgun pers. comm.). (2007) who extracted information from the Acronicta megacephala (Den. & Schiff.). Erro- distribution map published by Gorbunov neously indicated for the Murmansk region (2001). The source of this information cannot (Sinev 2008) after Sviridov (1970) who re- be recovered. ferred to specimens collected in northern Xanthorhoe incursata (Hb.). Record of this spe- Karelia. Ironically, Sviridov et al. (2009) re- cies from the surroundings of Murmansk ferred to Sinev (2008) as to the source of infor- (Djakonov 1911) is most likely based on mis- mation about the discovery of this species in identification of X. annotinata. the Murmansk region. Ecliptoptera capitata (H.-S.). Reported from 61 Acosmetia caliginosa (Hb.). Erroneously indi- and 84 (Shutova et al. 1999). However, this cated for the Murmansk region (Sinev 2008) species is monophagous on Impatiens noli- after Shutova et al. (1999) who referred to tangere, which is absent in northern Fenno- specimens collected in northern Karelia. A scandia, including the entire Kola Peninsula doubtful determination (A. Matov, pers. (Hultén 1971). Correctness of the identifica- comm.); the distribution range of the food- tion was therefore questioned, and after re-ex- plant, saw-wort (), is some amination of the specimen E. Shutova (pers. 1,000 km to the south from the sampling local- comm.) confirmed that this record concerns ity. Sviridov et al. (2009) referred to Sinev E. silaceata. (2008) as to the source of information about ENTOMOL. FENNICA Vol. 21 • Lepidoptera of Kola Peninsula 269

the discovery of this species in the Murmansk with Ypsolopha parenthesella which suddenly region. became abundant in birch forests around Mon- chegorsk in 2005–2006. Intriguingly, nine of the 124 species discov- 5. Discussion ered in the Kola Peninsula during the last decade were collected in industrial barrens – seemingly The records for 124 species that are new for the lifeless habitats surrounding major non-ferrous regional fauna increased the total number of spe- industries located in Nikel, Zapolyarnyy, and cies found in the Murmansk region to 813. Monchegorsk (Kozlov & Zvereva 2007). These Among these new records, 82 species were al- findings indicate that for some species this ready reported by Russian scientists (partially on heavily contaminated, but xerothermic environ- the basis of our material). We have not seen any ment is more suitable than undisturbed forest specimen of 44 species reported by Russian sci- habitats. Populations of several infrequent spe- entists as new for the regional fauna; in line with cies, such as Sesia bembeciformis, Ancylis laeta- the earlier practice (Kozlov & Jalava 1994) these na, Plusia festucae, Saturnia pavonia,andLasi- records require confirmation. Thus, to date the re- ommata petropolitana, persist in barren habitats cords of 50 species are based on data from pre- for decades, sometimes reaching high densities. vious publications only, because 26 of these 32 Some possible explanations for this phenomenon tentative records summarised by Kozlov & Jalava may be the on average higher summer tempera- (1994) have already been confirmed. turesinbarrensites(discussedbyKozlov& Sinev (2008) concluded that the fauna of Zvereva 2007) and the lower pressure from natu- moths and butterflies of the Murmansk region, ral enemies (Zvereva & Kozlov 2000, 2006). with 461 species of “microlepidoptera” and 272 The rate of discovery of new species in the species of “macrolepidoptera” (as reported in the fauna of the Kola Peninsula since the publication Catalogue of the Lepidoptera of Russia), is best of our first list (Kozlov & Jalava 1994) remained studied among the regions of Russia. He based relatively high until very recently: 109 new spe- this conclusion on the ratio between the numbers cies were collected during 1995–2000 (Kozlov et of “micros” and “macros”: the value of 1.695 is al. 2000; Shutova et al. 1999) and 114 new spe- highest among the 40 regions, and exceeds the cies – during the years 2001–2009 (Sviridov & average ratio (0.694) by a factor of 2.5. Changes Shutova 2002, Shutova 2004, 2008, Kozlov & reported in this paper increased the regional fauna Kullberg 2006, 2008, Sviridov et al. 2006, and to 813 species, but decreased this ratio to 1.525. the present paper). If the accumulation of new re- The decrease is associated with the wide use of cords continues with approximately the same rate light traps, which resulted in the capture of many (which obviously is influenced by sampling ef- species of “macros” which are difficult to collect fort), then the list of moths and butterflies of the by other methods. Kola Peninsula is likely to reach some 1000 spe- The primary reason of the high rate of new cies by the years 2020–2025. The greatest num- faunistic records from the Kola Peninsula during ber of new records is expected from the southern- two past decades is the intensive exploration of most part of the region, as well as from the White the regional fauna, in particular by collecting in Sea shore. The mouth of Ponoi river, where we previously unexplored areas. However, appear- could expect to find more eastern arctic species ance of new species in well-studied sampling known to occur west of Ural mountains, remains sites hints that many moths and butterflies are ex- the most critical “blank spot” in the Murmansk panding to the North. This tendency seems to be region. widespread in Northern Europe, as can be seen in On the other hand, we excluded from the re- particular from the updates to the provincial re- gional fauna 60 species reported by different re- cords of the Finnish moths and butterflies (Kull- searchers. The most frequent reasons of exclu- berg et al. 2010). This was in particular the case sion were erroneous identifications (confirmed with Lasiommata petropolitana which expanded for 18 species and presumed for 12 species) and some 100 km northwards in the early 2000s, and incorrect interpretation of label data (13 species). 270 Kozlov & Kullberg • ENTOMOL. FENNICA Vol. 21

Unfortunately, 37 of these 61 erroneous records Dubatolov, V. V., Ustjuzhanin, P. Ya. & Zintshenko, V. K. appeared in the first comprehensive checklist of 1997: A review of the Ethmiidae of the Asian part of Russia and neighbouring territories. — Atalanta 28: Russian moths and butterflies (Sinev 2008). In 161–171. contrast to the comments by Bolshakov (2008) Erschoff, N. & Fild, A. 1870: Catalogus lepidopterorum and Sviridov et al. (2009), who criticized the au- imperii Rossici. — Proceedings of the Russian Ento- thors of this checklist mostly for missing records mological Society 4: 130–205. that have already been published (i.e., for false Fridolin, V.Ju. 1936: (Community of and plants of Khibiny mountain area. Biocenotical investigations in negative records), we would like to attract atten- 1930–1935.) — Academy of Sciences of the USSR, tion of lepidopterologists to the urgent need to Moscow & Leningrad. 295 p. [In Russian.] stop spreading and citing false positive records Gielis, C. 2010: Fauna Europaea: Pterophoridae. — In: (some of which are listed above) across future Karsholt, O. & Nieukerken, E. J. van (eds.), Fauna Eu- publications. ropaea: Lepidoptera, Moths. Fauna Europaea version 2.1. [www document]. URL http://www.fauna- eur.org/. (Site visited on 18 January, 2010). Acknowledgements. We are thankful to A. Lvovsky, E. Gorbunov, P.Y.2001: The butterflies of Russia: Classifica- Melnikov and V.Zverev for assistance in collecting, and to tion, genitalia, keys for identification. — Thesis, Eka- S. Shestakov and V.Zhirov for permissions to operate light terinburg. 320 p. traps in the Lapland Biosphere Reserve and the Polar-Al- Gustafsson, B. 2010: Svenska fjärilar – Lepidoptera — Botanical Garden. Special thanks to T. Konovalova [www document]. URL http://www2.nrm.se/en/ for assistance in operating the light trap at Varzuga. We are svenska_fjarilar/. (Site visited on 20 February, 2010). indebted to L. Kaila, A. Lvovsky, V. Mironov and E. van Heath, J. & Leclercq, J. (eds.) 1981: Provisional atlas of the Nieukerken for identification of difficult taxa, and to V. invertebrates of Europe: Maps 1–27. — ITE, Abbots Anikin, S. Baryshnikova, A. Devyatkin, E. Gilyazova, P. Ripton. 64 p. Gorbunov, V.Dubatolov, A. Koryakin, V.Kovtunovich, A. Hultén, E. 1971: Atlas över växternas utbredning i Norden: Lvovsky, A. Matov, V. Mironov, E. Mitina, D. Morgun, S. fanerogamer och ormbunksväxter = Atlas of the distri- Nedoshivina, Yu.Nekrutenko, M. Ponomarenko, A. Popo- bution of vascular plants in northwestern Europe, 2nd va, A. Przhiboro, E. Shutova, S. Sinev, V. Tshikolovets, V. edn. — Generalstabens Litografiska Anstalt, Stock- Tuzov, and P. Ustjuzhanin for providing additional infor- holm. 531 p. mation. Special thanks due to Erik J. van Nieukerken for Karsholt, O., Aarvik, L., Agassiz, D., Huemer, P. & Tuck, numerous helpful suggestions and improving the lan- K. 2005: Acleris effractana (Hübner, 1799) – a Hol- guage. This work was made possible due to financial sup- arctic tortricid. — Nota Lepidopterologica 28: 93– port from the EC through the BALANCE project (EVK2- 102. 2002-00169), Maj & Tor Nessling Foundation, NordForsk Kataev, G. D. & Berlina, N. G. 2006: (Addition to the fau- (through the visiting professorship grant to M. Kozlov), na of moths and butterflies (Lepidoptera) of the Lap- Percy Sladen Memorial Fund, and the Academy of Finland land reserve, Murmansk district.) — In: Evsyukov, V. (projects 200724, 211734, 122133, 124152, 126045, and I. (ed.), (Entomological research in Northern Asia. the researcher exchange grants). Materials of 7th international meeting of entomologists from and Far East, 20–24 September 2006: 82–83.) Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of References Sciences, Novosibirsk. [In Russian.] Kozlov, M. V.1983: (Butterflies (Lepidoptera, Rhopaloce- ra) of Murmanskaya oblast.) — Manuscript 822-B95 Aarvik, L. E. 2010: Fauna Europaea: Tortricidae. — In: deposited in All-Union Institute for Scientific and Karsholt, O. & Nieukerken, E. J. van (eds.), Fauna Eu- Technical Information. Leningrad State University, ropaea: Lepidoptera, Moths. Fauna Europaea version Leningrad. 15 p. [In Russian.] 2.1. [www document]. URL http://www.fauna- Kozlov, M. V. & Jalava, J. 1994: Lepidoptera of Kola Pe- eur.org/. (Site visited on 18 January, 2010). ninsula, Northwestern Russia. — Entomologica Fen- Aarvik, L. E., Berggren, K. & Hansen, L. O. 2000: Catalo- nica 5: 65–85. gus Lepidopterorum Norvegiae. — Lepidopterologisk Kozlov, M. V., Jalava, J. & Shutova, E. 2000: New records arbeidsgruppe, Zoologisk museum, Universitetet i of Lepidoptera from the Kola Peninsula, Northwestern Oslo og Norsk institutt for skogforskning, Ås. 192 p. Russia. — Entomologica Fennica 11: 131–136. Bolshakov, L. V. 2008: (Book review: Catalogue of the Kozlov, M. V. & Kullberg, J. 2006: Lepidoptera of Terskij Lepidoptera of Russia / Sinev S. Yu., ed. – SPb.-M.: seashore of the Kola Peninsula, Northwestern Russia. KMK, 2008. – 424 p.) — Eversmannia 15–16: 93–97. — Entomologica Fennica 17: 123–129. [In Russian.] Kozlov, M. V. & Zvereva, E. L. 2007: Industrial barrens: Djakonov, A. M. 1911: (Notes on the Lepidoptera of Mur- extreme habitats created by non-ferrous metallurgy. — mansk coast). — Russian Entomological Review 11: Reviews in Environmental Science and BioTechnolo- 13–17. [In Russian.] gy 6: 231–259. ENTOMOL. FENNICA Vol. 21 • Lepidoptera of Kola Peninsula 271

Kozlov, M. V. & Kullberg, J. 2008: Lepidoptera of tundra ports [sic!], pt. 1: 144–160. Russian State Hydromete- habitats of the northern Kola Peninsula, Northwestern orological University, St. Petersburg. [In Russian.] Russia. — Entomologica Fennica 19: 114–121. Shutova, E. V. 2008: (Second addition to the check-list of Krogerus, H. 1943: Lepidopterologiska studier i södra Pet- Lepidoptera of the Kandalaksha Reserve.) — In: Mel- samo. — Notulae Entomologicae 23: 19–43. nikov, M. V. (ed.), (Ecologo-faunistic studies in Cen- Kullberg, J., Albrecht, A., Kaila, L. & Varis, V. 2002: tral Black Earth zone and neighbouring areas.) Materi- Checklist of Finnish Lepidoptera – Suomen perhosten als of 3rd regional conference, Lipetsk, 19–21 February luettelo. — Sahlbergia 6: 45–190. 2008: 159–165. Lipetsk State Pedagogical University, Kullberg, J., Albrecht, A., Kaila, L. & Varis, V. 2010: Lipetsk. [In Russian.] Checklist of Finnish Lepidoptera – Suomen perhosten Shutova, E. V., Antonova, E. M., Sviridov, A. V. & Kuten- luettelo. — [www document]. URL http://www.luo- kova, N. N. 1999: (Lepidoptera of the Kandalaksha re- mus.fi/elaintiede/hyonteiset/perhoset/ (Site visited on serve.) — Commission of the Russian Academy of 18 January, 2010). Sciences on Nature Reserves, Moscow, 48 p. (Flora Kuznetsov, V. I. 1978: (Fam. Tortricidae (Olethreutidae, and Fauna of Nature Reserves, 80). [In Russian.] Cochylidae) – Leafrollers.) — In: Falkovich, M. I. & Sinev, S. Yu. (ed.) 2008: Catalogue of the Lepidoptera of Medvedev, G. S. (eds.), (Keys for to the of the Russia. — KMK Scientific Press, St. Petersburg & European part of the USSR.) Vol. 4. Lepidoptera, pt. 1: Moscow. 424 p. [In Russian.] 163–180. Leningrad, Nauka. [In Russian.] Sviridov, A. V. 1970: (Moths and butterflies (Lepidoptera, Lvovsky, A. L. 1988: Broad-winged moths (Leopidoptera, Macrolepidoptera) in surroundings of Belomorskaya Oecophoridae) of northern Eurasia. — In: Zlobin, V. biological station of Moscow State University, and V. (ed.), The connections between entomofauna of their distribution across habitats.) — Entomologiches- North Europe and Siberia: 84–89. Zoological Institu- koe Obozrenie 49: 563–572. [In Russian.] te, Leningrad. 188 p. [In Russian.] Sviridov, A. V. & Shutova, E. V. 2002: Noctuid moths Lvovsky, A. L. & Morgun, D. V. 2007: Butterflies of Eas- (Lepidoptera) new for different areas of the Russian tern Europe. — Moscow, KMK press. 443 p. [In Rus- Federation, 1. Murmansk region. — Russian Entomo- sian.] logical Journal 11: 447. [In Russian.] Makarova, O. A. 2005: (Annals of nature of Pasvik State Sviridov, A. V., Trofimova, T. A., Uskov, M. V., Mukha- Nature Reserve. Vol. 9.) — Ryazan State Pedagogical nov, A. V.,Lobkova, L. E., Shchurov, V.I., Shutova, E. University, Ryazan. 149 p. [In Russian.] V., Kuznetsov, I. V., Lovtsova, Yu. A., Korzhov, P. N., Mikkola, K., Jalas, J. & Peltonen, O. 1989: Lepidoptera of Okulov, V.S. & Klepikov, M. A. 2006: Noctuid moths Finland. Geometridae 2. — Suomen Perhostutkijain (Lepidoptera) new for different regions of Russia. 2. Seura ry., Helsinki. 280 p. [In Finnish.] — Eversmannia 7/8: 46–68. [In Russian.] Mitina, E. G. & Kuznetsova, O. M. 2006: (On the fauna of Sviridov, A. V., Uskov, M. V., Lobkova, L. E., Reshetni- insect pests on trees and shrubs in the city of Mur- kov, S. P., Proklov, V.V.,Tatarenko, D. E., Shutova, E. mansk.) — Scientific Transactions of Murmansk State V., Mosyagina, A. R., Mukhanov, A. V., Polumordvi- Pedagogical University, Biological Sciences 2: 49–56. nov,O.A.,Shibaev,S.V.,Kuznetsov,I.V.,Blinushov, [In Russian.] A.E.,Burtnev,R.N.,Ishin,R.N.,Bolshakov,L.V., Mozolevskaya, E. G. 1999: (Specificity of structure and Ryabov, S. A. & Okulov, V. S. 2009: Noctuid moths population dynamics of dendrophagous insect fauna (Lepidoptera) new for different regions of the Russia. and its role in forests of the North.) — In: Dolgin, M. 3. — Eversmannia 17/18: 81–99. [In Russian.] M. (ed.), (Biodiversity of terrestrial and soil inverteb- Tammaru, T., Virtanen, T., Ruohomäki, K. & Kaila, L. rates in the North.) International Conference, Septem- 1995: Eupithecia veratraria Herrich-Schäffer, 1850 ber 15–17, 1999. Abstracts: 147–148. Syktyvkar State new to Scandinavia, with the redescription of E. vera- University, Syktyvkar. [In Russian.] traria ssp. arctica Viidalepp, 1974 (Lepidoptera, Geo- Nordström, F., Opheim, M. & Valle,K. J. 1955: De fennos- metridae). — Nota Lepidopterologica 18: 297–303. kandiska dagfjärilarnas utbredning. Lepidoptera Diur- Tengström, J. M. J. af. 1869: Catalogus Lepidopterorum nia (Rhopalocera & Hesperioidea). — Lunds Univer- faunae Fennicae praecursorius. — Notiser ur Sällska- sitets Årsskrift 51: 1–177. pets pro Fauna och Flora Fennica Forhandlingar 10: Nordström, F., Opheim, M. & Sotavalta, O. 1961: De fen- 287–371. noskandiska svärmarnas och spinnarnas utbredning Tuzov, V. K., Bogdanov, P. V., Devyatkin, A. L., Kaabak, (Sphinges, Bombycomorpha etc.). — Lunds Universi- L. V., Korolev, V. A., Murzin, V. S., Samodurov, G. D. tets. Årsskrift 57: 1–92, maps 1–181. & Tarasov, E. A. 1997: Guide to the butterflies of Rus- Povolný, D. 2002: Iconographia tribus Gnorimoschemini sia and adjacent territories. Vol. 1. Hesperiidae, Papi- (Lepidoptera, Gelechiidae) regionis Palaearcticae. — lionidae, Pieridae, Satyridae. — Pensoft Publ., Sofia Franisek Slamka, Bratislava. 110 p. & Moscow. 480 p. Shutova, E. V. 2004: (Additions and changes to the check- Tuzov, V.K., Bogdanov, P.V.,Churkin, S. V., Dantchenko, list of Lepidoptera of the Kandalaksha State Nature A. V., Devyatkin, A. L., Murzin, V. S., Samodurov, G. Reserve.) — In: Kljuikov, E. Yu. (ed.), Rational ex- D. & Zhdanko, A. B. 1997: Guide to the butterflies of ploitation of the coastal zone of the Northern Seas. 6th Russia and adjacent territories (Lepidoptera, Rhopalo- and 7th International Workshops. Materials of the re- cera). Vol. 2. Libytheidae, Danaidae, Nymphalidae, 272 Kozlov & Kullberg • ENTOMOL. FENNICA Vol. 21

Riodinidae, Lycaenidae. — Pensoft Publ., Sofia & to the insects of the European part of the USSR. Vol.4. Moscow. 580 p. Lepidoptera, pt. 2: 638–651. Nauka, Leningrad. [In Valle, K. J. 1933: Die Lepidopterenfauna des Petsamoge- Russian.] bietes under faunistisch-zoogeographischer Berück- Zvereva, E. L. & Kozlov, M. V. 2000: Effect of air pollu- sichtigung der Fauna ganz N-Fennoscandias. — An- tion on natural enemies of the leaf beetle, Melasoma nales Zoologici Societatis Zoologicae Botanicae Fen- lapponica. — Journal of Applied Ecology 37: 298– nicae “Vanamo” 1: 1–262. 308. Zagulajev, A. K. 1964: (Family Tineidae. Subfamily Ne- Zvereva, E. L. & Kozlov, M. V.2006: Top-down effects on mapogoninae. Fauna of USSR. Lepidoptera. Vol. 4, pt. population dynamics of Eriocrania miners (Lepidop- 2.) — Nauka, Leningrad. 424 p. [In Russian.] tera) under pollution impact: does enemy-free space Zagulajev, A. K. 1981: (Fam. Ethmiidae – ethmiid moths.) exist? — Oikos 115: 413–426. — In: Falkovich, M. I. & Medvedev, G. S. (eds.), Keys