DOCSLIB.ORG

VINTAGE MUSTANG SITE 12780 SE Mcloughlin Boulevard, Milwaukie, Oregon 97222

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
VINTAGE MUSTANG SITE 12780 SE Mcloughlin Boulevard, Milwaukie, Oregon 97222 FOR SALE VINTAGE MUSTANG SITE 12780 SE McLoughlin Boulevard, Milwaukie, Oregon 97222 www.svnimbrie.com PROPERTY HIGHLIGHTS • Conveniently located near Major Thoroughfares • Industrial Owner Use or Redevelopment Opportunity • Situated Across from Max Orange Line Terminus • Potential for Multifamily Development JOY HEINECKE | ADVISOR [email protected] O: 503.482.4157 | M: 503.953.2525 JEREMIAH WILGUS | SENIOR ADVISOR [email protected] O: 503.208.9405 | M: 541.580.8103 All SVN® Offices Independently Owned and Operated The information listed above has been obtained from sources we believe to be reliable, however, we accept no responsibility for its correctness. PROPERTY OVERVIEW | VINTAGE MUSTANG BUILDING | MIXED USE | MILWAUKIE, OREGON PROPERTY DETAILS Sale Price: $1,195,000 Commercial Building Size: 4,752 SF Lot Size: 27,007 SF Property Type: Mixed Use Zoning: C-3 Year Built: 1956 Construction: Masonry Construction 00167820, 00167839, APN Numbers: 00167811, 00167802 Submarket: Milwaukie Walk Score: 57 Transit Score: 50 All SVN® Offices Independently Owned and Operated The information listed above has been obtained from sources we believe to be reliable, however, we accept no responsibility for its correctness. ADDITIONAL EXTERIOR PROPERTY PHOTOS | VINTAGE MUSTANG BUILDING | MIXED USE | MILWAUKIE, OREGON All SVN® Offices Independently Owned and Operated The information listed above has been obtained from sources we believe to be reliable, however, we accept no responsibility for its correctness. PROPERTY MAP | VINTAGE MUSTANG BUILDING | MIXED USE | MILWAUKIE, OREGON SUBJECT PROPERTY Access Point (0.62 Acres) C-3 Zoning TriMet - Max Orange Line Terminus Access Access Point TriMet Parking All SVN® Offices Independently Owned and Operated The information listed above has been obtained from sources we believe to be reliable, however, we accept no responsibility for its correctness. AERIAL MAP | VINTAGE MUSTANG BUILDING | MIXED USE | MILWAUKIE, OREGON SUBJECT PROPERTY SE 27th Ave SE Park Ave AveSE 31st All SVN® Offices Independently Owned and Operated The information listed above has been obtained from sources we believe to be reliable, however, we accept no responsibility for its correctness. PROPERTY MAP | VINTAGE MUSTANG BUILDING | MIXED USE | MILWAUKIE, OREGON SUBJECT PROPERTY All SVN® Offices Independently Owned and Operated The information listed above has been obtained from sources we believe to be reliable, however, we accept no responsibility for its correctness. PARCEL MAP | VINTAGE MUSTANG BUILDING | MIXED USE | MILWAUKIE, OREGON SUBJECT PROPERTY All SVN® Offices Independently Owned and Operated The information listed above has been obtained from sources we believe to be reliable, however, we accept no responsibility for its correctness. CLACKAMAS COUNTY ZONING MAP | VINTAGE MUSTANG BUILDING | MIXED USE | MILWAUKIE, OREGON Subject Property All SVN® Offices Independently Owned and Operated The information listed above has been obtained from sources we believe to be reliable, however, we accept no responsibility for its correctness. CLACKAMAS COUNTY C-3 ALLOWED USES | VINTAGE MUSTANG BUILDING | MIXED USE | MILWAUKIE, OREGON C-3 ZONING ALLOWED USES Assembly Facilities, Civic and including auditoriums, churches, community centers, convention facilities, exhibition halls, fraternal organization lodges, senior centers, and theaters Cultural Facilities for the performing arts, including auditoriums, churches, community centers, convention facilities, exhibition halls, fraternal organization lodges, senior centers, and theaters for the performing arts Daycare Services/School Adult and Children (Nursing home is not permitted) Fitness Facilities Including athletic clubs, exercise studios, gymnasiums and health clubs, sports as basketball, dance, gymnastics, martial arts, racquetball, skating, soccer, swimming, and tennis. These facilities may be used for any of the following: general recreation, instruction, practice, and competitions Hospitality Hotels, Motels, Bed and Breakfast Residences and Inns Housing Single family to multifamily Manufacturing including the mechanical, physical, or chemical transformation of materials, substances, or components into new products; and the assembly of component parts. Primary processing of raw materials is prohibited Offices including administrative, business, corporate, governmental, and professional offices. Examples include offices for the following: accounting services, architectural services, business management services, call centers, employment agencies, engineering services, governmental services, income tax services, insurance services, legal services, manufacturer’s representatives, office management services, property management services, real estate agencies, and travel agencies Outpatient Clinics both of which may include associated pharmacies and laboratories—for healthcare services, such as acupuncture, chiropractic, counseling, dental, massage therapy, medical, naturopathic, optometric, physical therapy, psychiatric, occupational therapy, and speech therapy. Parking Parking Lots & Parking Structures Parks including amphitheaters; arboreta; arbors, decorative ponds, fountains, gazebos, pergolas, and trellises; ball fields; bicycle and walking trails; bicycle parks and skate parks; boat moorages and ramps; community buildings and grounds; community and ornamental gardens; courtyards and plazas; equine facilities; fitness and recreational facilities, such as exercise equipment, gymnasiums, and swimming pools; miniature golf, putting greens, and sports courts; nature preserves and wildlife sanctuaries; picnic areas and structures; play equipment and playgrounds; tables and seating; and similar recreational uses. Accessory uses to a park may include concessions, maintenance facilities, restrooms, and similar support uses. Research Facilities and including medical laboratories, medical research, product design and testing, and product research and development Laboratories Retailing whether by sale, lease, or rent—of any of the following new or used products: apparel, appliances, art, art supplies, beverages, bicycle supplies, bicycles, books, cameras, computers, computer supplies, cookware, cosmetics, dry goods, electrical supplies, electronic equipment, firewood, flowers, food, furniture, garden supplies, gun supplies, guns, hardware, hides, interior decorating materials, jewelry, leather, linens, medications, music (whether recorded or printed), musical instruments, nutritional supplements, office supplies, optical goods, paper goods, periodicals, pet supplies, pets, plumbing supplies, photographic supplies, signs, small power equipment, sporting goods, stationery, tableware, tobacco, all-terrain vehicles, automobiles, light trucks, motorcycles, and snowmobiles, boats; heavy trucks such as dump trucks, moving trucks, and truck tractors; large cargo trailers such as semitrailers; large construction equipment such as backhoes and bulldozers; large farm equipment such as tractors and combines; large forestry equipment; large mineral extraction equipment; manufactured dwellings; recreational vehicles; and residential trailers Services Personal and convenience, studio, information, maintenance and repair, food and beverage, construction, car-wash, business Storage Mini-storage/self-storage facilities , commercial storage of all-terrain vehicles, automobiles, light trucks, motorcycles, and snowmobiles, boats; heavy trucks such as dump trucks, moving trucks, and truck tractors; large cargo trailers such as semitrailers; large construction equipment such as backhoes and bulldozers; large farm equipment such as tractors and combines; large forestry equipment; large mineral extraction equipment; manufactured dwellings; recreational vehicles; and residential trailers All SVN® Offices Independently Owned and Operated The information listed above has been obtained from sources we believe to be reliable, however, we accept no responsibility for its correctness. DEMOGRAPHICS | VINTAGE MUSTANG BUILDING | MIXED USE | MILWAUKIE, OREGON DEMOGRAPHICS DATA 1 mile 3 miles 5 miles Total Households 5,5051 41,158 122,094 Total Population 11,564 98,757 293,448 Persons per Household 2.3 2.4 2.4 Average Household Income $59,024 $75,486 $74,788 Average House Value $305,582 $360,083 $374,290 Average Age 42.4 40.4 38.5 Average Age (Male) 39.0 39.5 37.9 Average Age (Female) 45.8 41.7 39.4 All SVN® Offices Independently Owned and Operated The information listed above has been obtained from sources we believe to be reliable, however, we accept no responsibility for its correctness. ABOUT THE CITY OF MILWAUKIE | VINTAGE MUSTANG BUILDING | MIXED USE | MILWAUKIE, OREGON Milwaukie, Oregon is a city in the state of Oregon. As of 2016, there were 20,291 people, 8,561 households, and 5,282 families residing in the city. The population density was 4,256.5 people per square mile. There were 8,988 housing units at an average density of 1,867.1 per square mile. The city is within the TriMet transit district and is served by Top Employers several TriMet Bus lines. In addition, TriMet's MAX Light Rail service was extended to Milwaukie on September 12, Unified Grocers 2015, connecting Portland to Milwaukie via light rail. PCC Structural RM International Currently the downtown area of Milwaukie is undergoing a N. Clackamas School District revival in which new apartments and retail space are under Meggitt OECO construction and a riverfront park is being developed. Safeway Existing attractions include a Sunday farmers'
Load more

Recommended publications
  • White Paper: Urban Application of Aerial Cableway Technology
    WHITE PAPER: URBAN APPLICATION OF AERIAL CABLEWAY TECHNOLOGY WSP USA | June 2018 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY WSP USA is pleased to present the following white paper that summarizes the benefits and items for consideration of aerial cableway technology; outlines the project development process; and addresses advantages, costs and challenges associated with developing aerial cableway systems in urban environments. Urban applications of aerial cableway technology have been successfully integrated into transit networks in numerous cities around the globe, including the Portland Aerial Tram (Portland, Oregon) and Roosevelt Island Tram (New York, NY). Interest in aerial cableway technology has grown considerably in the United States in recent years, and initial feasibility studies have been completed in several U.S. cities, including San Diego, CA; Washington DC; and Brooklyn, NY. WSP is evaluating aerial cableway technology as an innovative first- and last-mile connection to regional transit in urban areas. Aerial cableway technology offers multiple benefits, including: relatively lower costs compared to other transportation modes, the ability to overcome significant changes in topography and other obstacles in natural and man-made environments, the ability to bypass congested roadways and transportation corridors, the ability to move high volumes of passengers: the equivalent of one city bus every minute, a streamlined design that fits into the urban environment, the potential to integrate transit-oriented development (TOD) near stations, and the ability to provide service between residential areas and key destinations. Many of these benefits have been realized in existing systems in La Paz, Bolivia, and Medellin, Colombia. Specifically, Medellin’s Line K transports more than 40,000 passengers per day between residential areas and the city center, reducing some commute times from more than an hour to approximately 10 minutes.
    [Show full text]
  • Service Alerts – Digital Displays
    Service Alerts – Digital Displays TriMet has digital displays at most MAX Light Rail stations to provide real-time arrival information as well as service disruption/delay messaging. Some of the displays are flat screens as shown to the right. Others are reader boards. Due to space, the messages need to be as condensed as possible. While we regularly post the same alert at stations along a line, during the Rose Quarter MAX Improvements we provided more specific alerts by geographical locations and even individual stations. This was because the service plan, while best for the majority of riders, was complex and posed communications challenges. MAX Blue Line only displays MAX Blue Line disrupted and frequency reduced. Shuttle buses running between Interstate/Rose Quarter and Lloyd Center stations. trimet.org/rq MAX Blue and Red Line displays page 1 – Beaverton Transit Center to Old Town MAX Blue/Red lines disrupted and frequency reduced. Red Line detoured. Shuttle buses running between Interstate/RQ and Lloyd Center. trimet.org/rq MAX Blue and Red Line displays page 2 – Beaverton Transit Center to Old Town Direct shuttle buses running between Kenton/N Denver Station, being served by Red Line, and PDX. trimet.org/rq MAC Red and Yellow displays – N Albina to Expo Center Red, Yellow lines serving stations btwn Interstate/RQ and Expo Center. trimet.org/rq. Connect with PDX shuttle buses at Kenton. MAX Red display – Parkrose Red Line disrupted, this segment running btwn Gateway and PDX. Use Blue/Green btwn Lloyd Center and Gateway, shuttles btwn Interstate/RQ and Lloyd Center.
    [Show full text]
  • Grand Central Building Anchor Full Block Between Se 8Th & 9Th / Se Morrison & Belmont 808 Se Morrison Street | Portland | Oregon | 97214
    GRAND CENTRAL BUILDING ANCHOR FULL BLOCK BETWEEN SE 8TH & 9TH / SE MORRISON & BELMONT 808 SE MORRISON STREET | PORTLAND | OREGON | 97214 APPROXIMATELY 20,617 SQUARE FOOT ANCHOR SPACE WITH OFF-STREET PARKING AVAILABLE ANCHOR SIGNAGE OPPORTUNITY PRIME LOCATION IN THE CENTRAL EASTSIDE INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT ANCHOR SIGNAGE OPPORTUNITY SE MORRISON STREET Looking East From SE 7th & Morrison CENTRAL EASTSIDE INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT | SE 8TH & MORRISON / SE 9TH & BELMONT THE GRAND CENTRAL BUILDING Building Overview | A Contributing Historic Property to Portland’s Fruitpacking District The Grand Central Building is a Spanish Colonial Revival building originally constructed in 1929 as a public market in Portland’s fruitpacking district and featured 23 separate vendors. Available Space | Anchor Space Total: Approximately 20,617 Square Feet First Floor: 15,617 Square Feet Mezzanine: 5,000 Square Feet Parking | The Grand Central Building features an underground parking garage with 76 parking spaces as well as a surface lot on the west side of the building with 28 additional parking spaces. Building Co-Tenants | West Face of Building Area Retailers | Building Location | Located between SE Morrison & Belmont Streets, SE 8th & 9th Avenues The Central Eastside Industrial District (CEID), the area bound by Interstate 84 to the North, the Willamette River to the west, Powell Blvd / Hwy 26 to the south, and NE/SE 12th Avenue to the east, was once the fruitpacking center of Portland. Located immediately east across the Burnside, Morrison, and Hawthorne Bridges from Downtown Portland, the CEID provides a convenient - and often more spacious - alternative to the CBD for office users and retailers looking to locate in the Central City.
    [Show full text]
  • Trimet SE Service Enhancement Plan
    Presentation to the Clackamas County Board of County Commissioners September 22, 2015 Schedule Westside: Completed in 2014 Southwest: Completed in 2015 Eastside: Completion in 2016 Southeast: Completion in 2016 North/Central: Completion in 2016 Annual Service Plan Optimize & Maintain Restore Increase Capacity & Restore Frequent Increase spans & Reliability Service Levels frequencies Schedule & detail Add new lines tweaks Optimize routes & schedules Reconfigure lines Hillsboro Beaverton Gresham Portland Forest Grove/ Cornelius Tigard Happy Milwaukie King Valley City Lake Oswego Tualatin Legend Sherwood West Job center Linn Oregon City Downtown trips Hillsboro Beaverton Gresham Portland Forest Grove/ Cornelius Tigard Happy Milwaukie King Valley City Lake Oswego Tualatin Legend Sherwood West Job center Linn Oregon City Downtown trips Hillsboro Beaverton Gresham Portland Forest Grove/ Cornelius Tigard Happy Milwaukie King Valley City Lake Oswego Legend Tualatin Sherwood West Job center Linn Oregon City Downtown trips Outreach efforts: More service to Sunnyside Rd. Clackamas Industrial Area OC to Tualatin service Service to S. Oregon City trimet.org/southeast SOUTHEAST Help make transit better in your community Making Transit Better in Southeast Draft Vision We’ve been talking with riders What we heard from the community and community members We learned from Southeast riders and residents about the about improving bus service in challenges they face today and how the region will grow in the future. Based on this, we’re proposing more and better Southeast Portland, Estacada, bus service to help people get to jobs, education, health Gladstone, Happy Valley, care, affordable housing and essential services. Proposed Milwaukie, Oregon City and bus service improvements include route changes and extensions, new bus lines, adjusted frequency and better Clackamas County.
    [Show full text]
  • Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) and Light Rail Transit
    Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) and Light Rail Transit (LRT) Performance Characteristics Stations Mixed Traffic Lanes* Service Characteristics Newest Corridor End‐to‐End Travel Departures Every 'X' Travel Speed (MPH) City Corridor Segment Open length (mi) # Spacing (mi) Miles % Time Minutes BRT Systems Boston Silver Line Washington Street ‐ SL5 2002 2.40 13 0.18 1.03 42.93% 19 7 7.58 Oakland San Pablo Rapid ‐ 72R 2003 14.79 52 0.28 14.79 100.00% 60 12 14.79 Albuquerque The Red Line (766) 2004 11.00 17 0.65 10.32 93.79% 44 18 15.00 Kansas City Main Street ‐ MAX "Orange Line" 2005 8.95 22 0.41 4.29 47.92% 40 10 13.42 Eugene Green Line 2007 3.98 10 0.40 1.59 40.00% 29 10 8.23 New York Bx12 SBS (Fordham Road ‐ Pelham Pkwy) 2008 9.00 18 0.50 5.20 57.73% 52 3 10.38 Cleveland HealthLine 2008 6.80 39 0.17 2.33 34.19% 38 8 10.74 Snohomish County Swift BRT ‐ Blue Line 2009 16.72 31 0.54 6.77 40.52% 43 12 23.33 Eugene Gateway Line 2011 7.76 14 0.55 2.59 33.33% 29 10 16.05 Kansas City Troost Avenue ‐ "Green Line" 2011 12.93 22 0.59 12.93 100.00% 50 10 15.51 New York M34 SBS (34th Street) 2011 2.00 13 0.15 2.00 100.00% 23 9 5.22 Stockton Route #44 ‐ Airport Corridor 2011 5.50 8 0.69 5.50 100.00% 23 20 14.35 Stockton Route #43 ‐ Hammer Corridor 2012 5.30 14 0.38 5.30 100.00% 28 12 11.35 Alexandria ‐ Arlington Metroway 2014 6.80 15 0.45 6.12 89.95% 24 12 17.00 Fort Collins Mason Corridor 2014 4.97 12 0.41 1.99 40.00% 24 10 12.43 San Bernardino sbX ‐ "Green Line" 2014 15.70 16 0.98 9.86 62.79% 56 10 16.82 Minneapolis A Line 2016 9.90 20 0.50 9.90 100.00% 28 10 21.21 Minneapolis Red Line 2013 13.00 5 2.60 2.00 15.38% 55 15 14.18 Chapel Hill N‐S Corridor Proposed 8.20 16 0.51 1.34 16.34% 30 7.5 16.40 LRT Systems St.
    [Show full text]
  • Streetcar Plan Posters
    WELCOME Welcome! The purpose of this open house is to present draft recommendations from the Bicycle Master Plan and the Streetcar System Plan to the public. City sta! and citizen volunteers are here to present the material and to answer questions. The room is divided into three sections: one for the Bicycle Master Plan, one for the Streetcar System Plan, and one called “Integration Station,” where we tie the two concepts together. Refreshments and child care services are also available. The bicycle and streetcar networks will play a key role in Portland’s future. Together, they will reduce reliance on the automobile for daily tasks, they will reinforce urban land use patterns, and they will help the City achieve its goals to combat climate change. This is the beginning of a transportation transformation. WHY PLAN? PORTLAND HAS A HISTORY OF SUCCESSFUL LONG-RANGE PLANNING In 1904, landscape architect John C. Olmsted produced a report for the City Among the parks that resulted from the Olmsted Plan are Holladay Park, Irving Parks Board. The plan served as a blueprint for development of the highly Park, Mt. Tabor (shown above), Overlook Park, Rocky Butte, Sellwood Park, valued park system we enjoy today. Washington Park, and several others. Interstate MAX Opened 2004 Airport MAX Hillsboro MAX Opened 2001 Opened 1998 Portland Streetcar Opened 2001 MAX to Gresham Opened 1986 Clackamas MAX Opens fall 2009 Westside Express Service Opened Feb. 2009 In 1989, three years after the "rst MAX line opened from downtown to Gresham, 20 years later the regional rail system is well on its way to being constructed as planners laid out a vision for a regional rail system.
    [Show full text]
  • Each with Its Own Distinctive Personality and Style, PORTLAND's
    THE GET READY FOR YOUR 34 DOWNTOWN way to NEXT 35 OLD TOWN CHINATOWN 36 NORTHWEST PORTLAND 37 PEARL DISTRICT 38 CENTRAL EASTSIDE 39 HAWTHORNE/BELMONT . 40 DIVISION/CLINTON “10 Best in U.S.” 41 ALBERTA ARTS DISTRICT –Fodor’s Travel STREET42 MISSISSIPPI/WILLIAMS -TripAdvisor Each with its own SCENE distinctive personality and style, PORTLAND’S NEIGHBORHOODS add character to the city. ney St Pearl District NW Irving St NW Irving St ve ve A A A th oyt St th NW Hoyt St 6 6 ve ve A A Couch Park A W 1 W N St th NW Glisan St th NW Glisan 5 W 1 W N NW Flanders St ders St TRAVELPORTLAND.COM verett St NW Everett St COME VISIT US! ve e A l NW Davis St v P A Newberg, Oregon th 4 h KEEN Garage Portland t nity 0 i r 2 W 1 NW Couch St T 503.625.7385 N 505 NW 13th AVE NW NW vistaballoon.com NW W Burnside St Portland OR, 97209 405 SW ve PHOTOGRAPH BY AMYPHOTOGRAPH OUELLETTEBY ANKENY ALLEY IN OLD TOWN CHINATOWN A 33 JELD- h 3t 1 e Smith Lake Lake Force North Portland Harbor Smith Lake Columbia Slough Lake Force Columbia River Smith and Bybee Lakes Park North Portland Harbor N Swift Hwy Columbia Slough Delta Park Slough Columbia Slough Portland Intl Airport Columbia Slough Drainage Canal Drainage Canal Columbia Slough Columbia Slough Columbia Slough an Island Basin Sw Columbia Slough Columbia Slo ugh Columbia Columbia Slough Slough Beach Elem. School EAT PLAY The 1 Alder Street food cart pod (S.W.
    [Show full text]
  • Make Way for the Orange Line and a Milwaukian Renaissance
    Portland State University PDXScholar Metroscape Institute of Portland Metropolitan Studies Summer 2015 Make Way for the Orange Line and a Milwaukian Renaissance Ben Maras Let us know how access to this document benefits ouy . Follow this and additional works at: http://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/metroscape Part of the Transportation Commons, and the Urban Studies Commons Recommended Citation Maras, Ben (2015). "Make Way for the Orange Line and a Milwaukian Renaissance" Summer 2015 Metroscape, p. 6-12. This Article is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Metroscape by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Make Way for the Orange Line and a Milwaukian Renaissance by Ben Maras ilwaukie is undergoing major ther — appears poised to make a major changes: a new light rail line, a entrance into metro-area society. Mnew 8.5-acre waterfront park, “I believe the opening of the Orange a new two-mile neighborhood greenway, Line will be the beginning of a renais- two new bike trails, and increasing public sance for Milwaukie's downtown,” Wilda and private investment in its downtown. Parks, who served as Interim Mayor of Now, the former riverboat town and Milwaukie earlier this year, said. more recently, sleepy suburb of 20,000- Although the largest project by far is odd people — only six miles from down- the new MAX Orange Line, opening town Portland but qualitatively much far- September 12th, a number of smaller Page 6 Metroscape Milwaukie City Center Harrison investments have already begun to make significant impacts on the city.
    [Show full text]
  • Coordinated Transportation Plan for Seniors and Persons with Disabilities I Table of Contents June 2020
    Table of Contents June 2020 Table of Contents 1. Introduction .................................................................................................... 1-1 Development of the CTP .......................................................................................................... 1-3 Principles of the CTP ................................................................................................................ 1-5 Overview of relevant grant programs ..................................................................................... 1-7 TriMet Role as the Special Transportation Fund Agency ........................................................ 1-8 Other State Funding ................................................................................................................. 1-9 Coordination with Metro and Joint Policy Advisory Committee (JPACT) .............................. 1-11 2. Existing Transportation Services ...................................................................... 2-1 Regional Transit Service Providers .......................................................................................... 2-6 Community-Based Transit Providers ..................................................................................... 2-18 Statewide Transit Providers ................................................................................................... 2-26 3. Service Guidelines ........................................................................................... 3-1 History .....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Outreach Summary P a G E | 1 August 2020 REFERENCE B
    REFERENCE B Outreach #1 Summary Table of Contents Introduction..................................................................................................................................................1 Listening Sessions ........................................................................................................................................2 Online Survey................................................................................................................................................2 Key Findings..................................................................................................................................................3 Survey Questions and Summary ..................................................................................................................3 Demographics.............................................................................................................................................29 Appendix A..................................................................................................................................................39 Appendix B................................................................................................................................................136 Appendix C................................................................................................................................................139 Introduction The following report provides an overview of the results of the listening sessions and
    [Show full text]
  • MAKING HISTORY 50 Years of Trimet and Transit in the Portland Region MAKING HISTORY
    MAKING HISTORY 50 Years of TriMet and Transit in the Portland Region MAKING HISTORY 50 YEARS OF TRIMET AND TRANSIT IN THE PORTLAND REGION CONTENTS Foreword: 50 Years of Transit Creating Livable Communities . 1 Setting the Stage for Doing Things Differently . 2 Portland, Oregon’s Legacy of Transit . 4 Beginnings ............................................................................4 Twentieth Century .....................................................................6 Transit’s Decline. 8 Bucking National Trends in the Dynamic 1970s . 11 New Institutions for a New Vision .......................................................12 TriMet Is Born .........................................................................14 Shifting Gears .........................................................................17 The Freeway Revolt ....................................................................18 Sidebar: The TriMet and City of Portland Partnership .......................................19 TriMet Turbulence .....................................................................22 Setting a Course . 24 Capital Program ......................................................................25 Sidebar: TriMet Early Years and the Mount Hood Freeway ...................................29 The Banfield Project ...................................................................30 Sidebar: The Transportation Managers Advisory Committee ................................34 Sidebar: Return to Sender ..............................................................36
    [Show full text]
  • Microsoft Office Outlook
    Christie, Robyn From: Richard Benedetti [[email protected]] Sent: Monday, April 11, 2011 10:03 AM To: Council Distribution Subject: No on LO to Portland Streetcar Categories: Blue Category We would like to emphatically state that we are against the LO to Portland streetcar project. We have read all the pros and cons and feel that it is a project that will not live up to its expectations. Not many of Tri-Met's projects have. That being said, we simply feel it is too expensive, is not needed and may bring more crime to LO. LO has more on its plate that it can now handle. With the WEB building, Foothills project, water project, sewer project and Lake Grove Village plan, the resources of the city are stretched far enough as it is. The city should concentrate on these projects rather than take on the streetcar project that we feel is not a must have. The police and 911 people need new facilities, the schools are in trouble and the city hall needs remodeling or the city personnel moved to the WEB. There is just too much needed that will have a return and not an ambiguous return like the streetcar. We will watch to see how each of the council votes on this. Again we are against it. We have not talked to any of our neighbors that support the streetcar project. Richard and Annette Benedetti Christie, Robyn From: Richard Benedetti [[email protected]] Sent: Monday, April 11, 2011 10:02 AM To: [email protected] Cc: Christie, Robyn Subject: No on LO to Portland Streetcar Categories: Blue Category We would like to emphatically state that we are against the LO to Portland streetcar project.
    [Show full text]