Streetcar Plan Posters

WELCOME

Welcome! The purpose of this open house is to present draft recommendations from the Bicycle Master Plan and the Streetcar System Plan to the public. City sta! and citizen volunteers are here to present the material and to answer questions.

The room is divided into three sections: one for the Bicycle Master Plan, one for the Streetcar System Plan, and one called “Integration Station,” where we tie the two concepts together. Refreshments and child care services are also available.

The bicycle and streetcar networks will play a key role in Portland’s future. Together, they will reduce reliance on the automobile for daily tasks, they will reinforce urban land use patterns, and they will help the City achieve its goals to combat climate change. This is the beginning of a transportation transformation. WHY PLAN?

PORTLAND HAS A HISTORY OF SUCCESSFUL LONG-RANGE PLANNING

In 1904, landscape architect John C. Olmsted produced a report for the City Among the parks that resulted from the Olmsted Plan are Holladay Park, Irving Parks Board. The plan served as a blueprint for development of the highly Park, Mt. Tabor (shown above), Overlook Park, Rocky Butte, Sellwood Park, valued park system we enjoy today. Washington Park, and several others.

Interstate MAX Opened 2004 Airport MAX Hillsboro MAX Opened 2001 Opened 1998 Portland Streetcar Opened 2001

MAX to Gresham Opened 1986

Clackamas MAX Opens fall 2009

Westside Express Service Opened Feb. 2009

In 1989, three years after the "rst MAX line opened from downtown to Gresham, 20 years later the regional rail system is well on its way to being constructed as planners laid out a vision for a regional rail system. envisioned.

BICYCLE MASTER PLAN Making Bicycling an Integral Part of Daily Life in Portland

Bicycle Master Plan

City of Portland Office of Transportation As a result of the plan, the number of bikeway miles in Portland has more than tripled. In 1996, the City adopted the current Bicycle Master Plan. It envisioned a citywide As the next generation of facilities is constructed, more and more Portlanders are likely bikeway network, with detailed implementation strategies and design guidelines. to view the bicycle as a viable transportation option.

In 1990, the “Northwest Triangle” district In 1995, city planners unveiled the River District consisted mainly of underutilized and abandoned Urban Design Plan, which envisioned a mixed Today, the area has been transformed to the Pearl District, home to parks, locally-owned warehouses and rairoad spurs. use urban neighborhood. businesses, o#ce buildings, and thousands of residents. Streetcar System Plan HISTORIC PERSPECTIVE

1918 STREETCAR SYSTEM MAP

HISTORIC HIGHLIGHTS In 1919, there were: • 100,301,793 total passengers carried by streetcar lines. • 197.17 miles of track. • 15,668,670 streetcar miles run. • An average route length of 4.7 miles.

MODERN HIGHLIGHTS Modern Streetcar: • Connects walkable neighborhoods. • Is a strategic development tool. • Had 4.3 million riders in 2008. • Has 4.1 route miles of track.

! Streetcar System Plan

THE MISSION OF THE STREETCAR SYSTEM PLAN

It is the mission of the Streetcar System Plan to identify an interconnected system of streetcar corridors that are integrated with the City’s transportation and land use network.

The Portland Streetcar System Plan plays a key role in shaping the City by promoting walkable neighborhoods; vibrant main streets that encourage sustainable development; infrastructure that reduces vehicle trips; and greater accessibility that includes housing options, employment and economic development.

Green Streetcar Corridor Vision Solar Energy

Active Green Roofs with Buildings step down to single family residential Solar Collection Inviting and Active Neighborhood Places Green Buildings

Green Roof Green Roof t Green Roof t h g gh Li Li

Single Family Residential Mixed Use Residential Green Mixed Use Residential with Residential Local Single Family Residential Neighborhood with Ground Floor Streetcar Street Employment and Green Street Neighborhood Active Uses Ground Floor Active Uses

Green Streetcar Streets Mixed Use Development Green Streets Transitions to Residential Streetcar Service Place Making Pedestrian Friendly Complement Character Pedestrian Priority Ground Floor Active Uses: Bicycle Connectivity Mixed Use Scale: SMART Systems: • Restaurants, Shops and Stormwater Management • Step Down Buildings • Way Finding Neighborhood Services Access for All • Reduce Building Mass • Interpretive Information Employment Over Active Uses: • Residential Scale Entries • Trip Planning • O! ces and Services Protect Solar Exposure Bicycle Connectivity • Residential on Top Stormwater Management Alternative Energy Access for All LEED Certi" ed Thermal Energy Distribution

" Streetcar System Plan GOALS OF THE STREETCAR SYSTEM PLAN

SIX GOALS OF THE STREETCAR SYSTEM PLAN PROJECT Mayor Sam Adams and the Streetcar System Project team have identi" ed six goals for the project – three for the development of the overall streetcar system plan and three for the evaluation of potential streetcar corridors.

A Successful Streetcar System will:

• Help the City achieve its peak oil and sustainability strategies. • Provide an organizing structure and catalyst for the City’s future growth along streetcar corridors. • Integrate Streetcar corridors into the City’s existing neighborhoods.

Successful Streetcar Corridors need to:

• Be a viable transit option with adequate ridership. • Have redevelopment potential. • Demonstrate community support to make the changes necessary for a successful streetcar corridor.

# Streetcar System Plan PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT

CITY WIDE STREETCAR SYSTEM PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT PROCESS

TRANSPORTATION PLANNING LAND USE PLANNING COMMUNITY LEADERS URBAN DESIGN LOCAL BUSINESSES TRANSIT PLANNING NEIGHBORS CIVIL ENGINEERING LOCAL ORGANIZATIONS SUSTAINABLE INFRASTRUCTURE PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT

System Advisory Streetcar Committee System Plan PROJECT (CITIZENS) Project Team MILESTONES (PM) District Working Groups

Development Oriented Transit Team

PORTLAND OFFICE OF TRANSPORTATION (PDOT) TRIMET BUREAU OF PLANNING METRO PORTLAND DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION (PDC) OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (ODOT)

PM PM PM PM

POTENTIAL STREETCAR DRAFT STREETCAR IMPLEMENTATION FINAL STREETCAR SYSTEM CORRIDOR AND SYSTEM SYSTEM PLAN STUDY PLAN TO PLANNING EVALUATION COMMISSION / CITY COUNCIL SPRING 2008 SPRING 2009 SPRING 2009 SUMMER 2009 PUBLIC MEETINGS PUBLIC MEETINGS (MAY 2009) DISTRICT WORKING GROUPS March 2009

ROLES IN THE PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT PROCESS

District Working Groups To assess support for potential streetcar corridors through the city, citizen-led District Working Groups (DWG) were formed by the City of Portland Bureau of Transportation (BOT) Streetcar System Plan (SSP) project team. Representing ! ve districts of the city, citizen-led District Working Groups were asked to discuss and share their thoughts on streetcars and their potential in" uence on urban corridors in the districts where they live and work.

The System Advisory Committee (SAC) The SAC is a geographically, ethnically, and generationally diverse group of people who represent the broader community and who are interested in a streetcar system in Portland. The committee maintains a big picture understanding of the Streetcar System Plan and has provided community input throughout the project to the Development Oriented Transit Team (DOTT). As the project progressed, the SAC interacted closely with the District Working Groups and represented their perspectives to the DOTT. Ultimately, they will work with the Portland O# ce of Transportation, Mayor Adams’ O# ce, and the DOTT to present the plan and recommendations to the Planning Commission and City Council.

The Project Team The Portland O# ce of Transportation is the lead agency and has contracted with a consultant team led by URS to support City sta$ .

The Development Oriented Transit Team (DOTT) The Development Oriented Transit Team brings the perspectives of cooperating agencies and bureaus to guide the planning process and make sure the project is aligned with agency/bureau objectives and plans. The Portland O# ce of Transportation is the lead agency. Streetcar System Plan TECHNOLOGY COMPARISON

HOW DOES STREETCAR COMPARE TO BUSES AND LIGHT RAIL?

Streetcar, bus and light rail are the primary transit vehicles operating in Portland. The table below, which compares the operational characteristics of the three modes, illustrates streetcar’s unique ability to combine the bene" ts of bus and light rail.

Portland Transit Vehicle Type Streetcar Light Rail Transit (LRT) Bus (low-floor) Vehicle Length 66 feet long 92 feet long 40 feet long 8 feet wide 8.5 feet wide 8.5 feet wide Power Source Overhead wire Overhead wire Diesel engine Passenger Entry Partial low floors, Partial low floors, Partial low floors, Doors on both sides Doors on both sides Door on one side Passenger Boarding Convenient and accessible Convenient and accessible Convenient and accessible boarding boarding boarding Passenger Capacity 30 seats 64 seats 39 seats 51 standees 69 standees 12 standees 81 total 133 total 51 total (266 per train) 110 total “crush design”* 64 total “crush design”* 166 total “crush design”*

Amenities Space for wheelchairs, Space for wheelchairs, Space for wheelchairs and bikes, strollers, etc. bikes, strollers, etc. bikes Expected Vehicle 30 Years 30-35 Years 15 Years Lifespan Cost per Vehicle $2.9 Million $3.8 Million $400,000

* or total “design crush load”

BUS

STREETCAR

LRT

$ Streetcar System Plan THE BENEFITS OF STREETCAR

BUILDING ON SUCCESS The Portland Streetcar System Plan is intended to build upon the success of the existing streetcar system and expand service along corridors to best serve Portland’s neighborhoods and business districts outside of the downtown core. It is a key element in the City’s plan for a sustainable future for Portland and the region. Providing modern streetcar service has many documented bene" ts including:

• Supporting and strengthening the existing transit network and increasing ridership. • Providing an accessible network of transportation options. • Organizing and catalyzing higher-density developments while respecting the unique character of our neighborhoods. • Helping reduce urban sprawl. • Promoting better health by fostering pedestrian activity. • Reducing vehicle miles traveled and dependency on foreign oil. • Helping reduce greenhouse gas emissions and improve air quality. • Helping promote a healthier local and state economy. • Creating a framework to help accommodate future regional growth.

% Streetcar System Plan DEVELOPMENT SUCCESS STORY

DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY ADJACENT TO THE PORTLAND STREETCAR

QUIMBY N A IT PETTYGROVE O H G

T R

5 OVERTON B

2 Y "! "! "! "! "! A W NORTHRUP "! D 24TH "! "! "! A O R MARSHALL "! B "!"! "! 22ND 10TH 23RD LOVEJOY "!"! "! "! "!

"! "!H "! "! "!

KEARNEY 6 "! "! IR 1 O

JOHNSON "! Y N

"! "! A S %$#405 I "! "! "! D IRVING W E

D H "!

H "! T

T G

4 R

12TH B 1

1 "! "! R EL

B E GLISAN "! "! ST 9TH 6TH FLANDERS 4TH

H "!

8 11TH

1 EVERETT"! "! "! "! H "!

8 5TH I "!

N "! "! I "! R COUCH "! "! T BUR NSIDE PARK "! "!"! "! BURNSIDE BRG

Y "! A MO R "! W H H R "! I D T T S A "! "! O L A 0 8 N DE 2 1 H R O ST T R A 6 R B K 1 "!H H T T 2 4 1 1 "! "! H "! D H T R T 4 3 9 1 YA "! "! MH MO "! IL RR H "! L IS JEF "! ON F 0T B E H TA R RS 1 YL G ON T S OR "! 1 "!"! A L D "!1 MO H K N N CL T R 2 A 2 Y A H M 1 "! "! A P "! T IN "! "! 6 "! 5 C"!O "! %$# "! LU MA M M DISO ON "! B N TGO IA ME "! R M HA Y AR H W KE T TH T 5 OR MI NE LL BR HA H G LL "! T T "! 4 S Y 1 A W "! H "! D T 3 A "! "! 1 H "!O AR R RIS B ON! " O HA T LL I CO"! "! A L N LE "! "! "! "! GE

LINCOLN ! " G R B M A U Q R "! A M W

i l l a m

e t t e

R i v e r

D BRG ROSS ISLAN

"!GIBBS

Legend "! Y "! "! D "!

D "!

MAX Routes M "! "! O

B Portland Streetcar ! '& Development Projects LOWELL"! 0 0.25 0.5 Miles & Streetcar System Plan DEVELOPMENT SUCCESS STORY

PERCENTAGE OF DEVELOPMENT BASED UPON DISTANCE FROM STREETCAR

A 2005 study of real estate development within streetcar-served neighborhoods tracked Portland’s development trends (pre- and post- streetcar) based on distance from the alignment. It found that after streetcar investment was secured, lots within 1 block of streetcar captured 55% of new development within neighborhoods that streetcars passed through. (Source: E.D. Hovee & Company, Portland Streetcar Development Impacts, February 2008) Note: Streetcar’s in" uence on building location and intensity is just one part of a broader transit-supportive land use strategy that can include development incentives and public-private partnerships.

EASTSIDE STREETCAR LOOP DEVELOPMENT / SUBURBAN DEVELOPMENT CARBON FOOTPRINT COMPARISONS

Carbon footprint modeling associated with the “Eastside Streetcar Loop Project” estimated the potential for a 60 High Density / Suburban percent overall carbon footprint savings with high density Carbon Footprint Comparisons urban development when compared to a suburban alternative. With employment, a 45 percent reduction in Residential Footprint the carbon footprint was identi" ed. (Source: E.D. Hovee & Company, Memorandum on Carbon Footprint Bene! ts Modeling, 17.1 65% savings February 2008)

5.9 Annual Tons per Household Suburban High Density Environment Environment

Employment Footprint

9.2 45% savings 5.1 Annual Tons per Job Portland Streetcar Loop Project Sketch Stop at SE Stark and SE Grand Shiels Obletz Johnsen - URS - Lloyd D. Lindley, ASLA - Elcon Associates Suburban High Density March 12, 2009 Environment Environment

Source: E. D. Hovee & Company, LLC. ' Streetcar System Plan CITY WIDE STREETCAR CORRIDOR TECHNICAL EVALUATION PROCESS

Primary Transit Index Selection Criteria: PRIMARY TRANSIT INDEX • Transit Oriented Index – Housing, Employment, Retail Densities (All Possible Corridors) • Primary/Secondary Anchors PTI October 2007 • TriMet Level of Service Total PTI Corridor Miles = 210 Level 1 • 138 miles December 2007 Level 2 • 19 miles Level 3 • 53 miles

Select City-Wide Set of Promising Corridors Selection Criteria: • Primary Transit Index Rating of 1 and 2 • Eliminate Based on Fatal Flaws Phase 1 • Fill Gaps in Coverage/Missed Opportunities PHASE 1 Total Miles = 114 January 2008 Corridor Screening Phase 1 Level 1 • 82 miles Level 2 • 15 miles Level 3 • 17 miles Select Best Streetcar Land Use Corridors Phase 2A Selection Criteria: PHASE 2A • Existing, Planned or Potential Land Use Select Best Streetcar Corridors Corridor Evaluation Selection Criteria: November 2008 Phase 2B Phases 2A & 2B PHASE 2B • Viable Transit Option with Adequate Ridership Total Miles = 76 • Ability to Catalyze Re/Development Remaining • 76 miles Deferred to Phase 3A Portland Plan • 40 miles PHASE 3A HCT Study • 15 miles System Evaluation Select Best Streetcar System Selection Criteria: • Public Support PHASE 3B May 2009 Phase 3B • Stakeholder Evaluation Select Best Streetcar System Selection Criteria: • Top-Performing Transit Ridership Phases 3A & 3B • Structure/Catalyst for Future Main St Growth Total Miles = 41 DRAFT PORTLAND Agency & Public Review Implementation Strategies Note: figure reflects STREETCAR SYSTEM PLAN general corridor lengths • Open Houses • Financing (not actual route miles). • SAC/DOTT • Operations

• Planning Commission • Phasing CITY OF

• City Council FINAL PORTLAND • Community support BUREAU OF STREETCAR SYSTEM PLAN June 2009 ! Streetcar System Plan PRIMARY TRANSIT INDEX !PTI" STUDY AND PHASE 1 SCREEN

The Primary Transit Index (PTI) Study was completed by the city and consultant team in late 2007 and set The Phase 1 Screen identi" ed streetcar corridors that had reasonable potential to be included in the the stage for the PSSP e! ort. The PTI study identi" ed a city-wide set of frequent service transit corridors Streetcar System plan, eliminating PTI corridors that would not work as streetcar corridors, and ensure that could help guide future transit and land use infrastructure investments. The PTI study categorized that there are no major gaps in a possible city-wide Streetcar System. Key considerations included existing and potential transit corridors within the city using two primary measures: the PTI ranking (PTI-1 and PTI-2 scores were selected), an engineering-feasibility assessment of each corridor, Main Street designations, and a service-gap assessment to ensure all districts of the City were 1. Transit Orientation Index (TOI) score - a measure that evaluates the relative transit attractiveness of a considered. corridor based on many factors, including density of households, density of general employment and density of retail employment.

2. Anchor Requirements - the presence and/or absence of primary or secondary transit attractors (or anchors) at the ends or within a corridor.

PRIMARY TRANSIT INDEX PHASE 1 Phase 3 Screen Diagram Phase 3 Screen Diagram PTI Results Existing/Planned Streetcar Phase 1 Results Existing/Planned Streetcar

C 1st Level Corridor Existing Streetcar C Corridors Remaining Existing Streetcar lark l a r k Jantzen M u Jantzen M u Beach ! l t n 2nd Level Corridor Planned Streetcar Beach ! l t n after Screen 1 Planned Streetcar o ma o m h 3rd Level Corridor ah WA S H I N G WA C S olumbia River Previously Considered Columbia River H I N O R E G T O R G T ON Existing/Planned HCT E G O N Existing Transit Existing/Planned HCT O N PTN Corridor O N MAX Light Rail TriMet Bus Routes MAX Light Rail IS S U UI O O L F L F T ESS (Existing/Under Construction) T ES (April 2009) (Existing/Under Construction) S EN S SE DE ND N Planned High Capacity Transit EN Planned High Capacity Transit

Portland International (HCT) to be Studied by Region Portland International (HCT) to be Studied by Region Airport Airport ! Frequent Bus Service Portland Aerial Tram ! Frequent Bus Service Portland Aerial Tram

WILLIS WILLIS

H H T T U O OU M M 205 S 205 TS $ T R %&

DENVER $

LOMBARD DENVER %& LOMBARD OR PO P

! ! ! C ! C 5 OLU 5 OL University of $ DE MB University of UMB %& KUM I $ DE A %& KUM I A W Portland Willamette RivePortland ROSA PARKS ROSA PARKS i Concordia 82ND Concordia l 82ND la University University m ! ! e 27TH tt 27TH GREELEY e PCC GREELEY PCC R Cascade Cascade ! ! iv KILLINGSWORTH KILLINGSWORTH 30 e 30 #" #" A r AIR r AIR PO N PO INA RT I RT

B A 30TH LBERTA ALBERTA 30TH

L MLK MLK JR ALB MLK MLK JR

A GOING GOING

PRE SA R SA 33RD SCOTT N PRE D 33RD SCOTT N Y E DY

U Y M Y

L P L I

I L

L U

SSIPPI CUL S N

I L C

VANCOUVER WILLIAMS

VA W

MISSI FREMONT M FREMONT Legacy Legacy Emanuel Y Emanuel ND DY ! SA 84 AN 84 ! 57TH ! S %&$ ! 57TH %&$ 42ND VAUGHN VAUGHN 42ND 24TH 15TH 24TH THURMAN THURMAN 15TH BROADWAY BROADWAY WEIDLER WEIDLER 122ND

Legacy 122ND Rose Legacy Rose

18TH Lloyd Good Samaritan Garden Good Samaritan 18TH Lloyd Ctr ! HALSEY Garden Ctr ! ! ! ! ! HALSEY L Union L Union EL ! Station EL Station RN RN ! CO ! CO ! Conv Conv 19TH 19TH

21ST Ctr 23RD 405 21ST Ctr 23RD 405 %&$ ! %&$ ! GLISAN GLISAN Providence

12TH Providence

12TH GLISAN 28TH BURNSIDE Portland BURNSIDE 28TH Portland M ult n omah ! M ult n ! PGE 102ND omah PGE 102ND E 99TH T ID Park BURNSIDE E H 99TH BURNSIDE S G SID Park O RN I RN G R BU LH U IL B A B H U Wash i n STARK M Was AM R gton GRAND 39TH h i n gton GRAND 39TH N MLK MLK JR STARK MLK JR STARK MORRISON STARK MORRISON STARK BELMONT BELMONT WA SHINGTON Mall WA SHINGTON Mall 205 ! 205

MADISO 20TH ! N MADISON 20TH PSU PSU HAWTHOR 76TH MAIN MAIN ! NE HAWTHORNE 76TH ! ! 162ND 60TH 162ND #"26 ! "26 60TH ! OMSI # 82ND OMSI ! Adventist ! 82ND Adventist

7TH Medical Center

7TH Medical Center 11TH LINCOLN PCC 11TH PCC 50TH Southeast 50TH Southeast DIVISION ! DIVISION ! 122ND 148TH CLINTON CLINTON 122ND OHSU DIVISION OHSU DIVISION ! ! Shriners ! 21ST ! ! Shriners ! 21ST ! ! Doernbecher ! Doernbecher ! VA ! Plans for 205 VA ! Plans for 205 POWELL $ POWELL Powell-Foster corridor %& Medical $ Powell-Foster corridor %& Medical Center to be determined Center to be determined

26TH P

OW 26TH P E OW LL ELL FO F S O TE ST R E HOLGATE HOLGATE R RY B Plans for Y Plans for EAV RR BEAV FER ERT Barbur corridor ER S ON FE TON Barbur corridor L - H S - L IL to be determined LL H to be determined HO L O IL S 39TH H L 39TH

C 28TH S

D 28TH S A SC DA

L MILWAUKIE E L M H E W H I Y W LW MACAD Y 5 5 M 136TH

A 136TH %&$ %&$ A C Reed College U Reed College A

D ! I E ! A A

M WOODSTOCK M WOODSTOCK

BERTH B

ERT

FOSTER H A FOSTER BYBEE A BYBEE Plans for Plans for Lake Oswego-to-Portland Lake Oswego-to-Portland corridor to be determined corridor to be determined 32ND MULT 32ND NOMAH Y MULTNOMA H Y 52ND

R 52ND RR FLAVEL FLAVEL GA GA R RD E

E 13TH R N FE D H EN 13TH OM H F E S OME OR RS YL TACOMA LO TA TAY TACOMA

Y 72ND 72ND

H R R L U BU B AR O R T A B M u l t n o m a h I B

P M u l t n o m a h

CAPITOLHWY

C TERWILLIGER C l a c k a m a s TERWILLIGER C l a c k a m a s

! ! Lewis & Clark ! Lewis & Clark Lewis & Clark College Lewis & Clark College School of Law School of Law ! ! ! ! Providence Providence Milwaukie Milwaukie

RY Y ER RR ! F FE PCC ES PCC ! S N NE Sylvania OO O B Sylvania BO 82ND 82ND Clackamas Clackamas Town Center Town Center ! ! ! ! Kaiser ! ! Kaiser ! Sunnyside Sunnyside 1 0 1 2 3 Miles 1 0 1 2 3 Miles K:\25696596_CoP_Streetcar_System_Plan\MXDs\Final_Report\Ph1_simpl_lett.mxd 1:95040 K:\25696596_CoP_Streetcar_System_Plan\MXDs\Final_Report\Ph1_simpl_lett.mxd 1:95040 " Streetcar System Plan PHASE 2A AND 2B SCREENS

The Phase 2A screening was the " rst of a very detailed two-step technical screening process. The primary The Phase 2B screening completed the technical screening of the candidate corridors by identifying those purpose of the Phase 2 screening process was to evaluate and identify the most technically viable (priority) corridors that would provide: streetcar corridors. The Phase 2A screen focused primarily on the land-use designations surrounding the surviving corridors. Those corridors with lower-density land-use zoning were identi" ed. An assessment was • A viable rail-transit service along the corridor given the transportation demands upon the right-of- then made whether it was reasonably feasible to assume that a future change to the land-use zoning would way (including bikes, freight, and pedestrians) allow for more intense development along the corridor. Corridors with lower-density zoning likely to remain • Additional transit ridership by providing a high-quality and time-competitive service were removed from further consideration. • Service to higher-density neighborhoods including Regional Center or Town Centers • A catalyst to foster new development on currently under-utilized land-uses within a ¼ mile of the corridor • Support to, or be compatible with, other City green-infrastructure initiatives

PHASE 2A PHASE 2B Phase 3 Screen Diagram Phase 3 Screen Diagram 2A Technical Results Existing/Planned Streetcar 2B Technical Results Existing/Planned Streetcar Existing Streetcar Existing Streetcar C l 2A High Score C la 2B High Score a r k M r k Jantzen M u Jantzen u Beach ! l t n 2A Low Score Planned Streetcar Beach ! l t 2B Medium Score Planned Streetcar o n o ma m a h h 2B Low Score W W A S A SH Columbi a R H I Columbia Rive I iver N GT r O N GT OR R O Existing Transit Existing/Planned HCT E GO ON Existing Transit Existing/Planned HCT E GO N N N TriMet Bus Routes MAX Light Rail TriMet Bus Routes MAX Light Rail IS IS U OU LO F L F T ES (April 2009) (Existing/Under Construction) T ESS (April 2009) (Existing/Under Construction) S SE S EN ND DE EN Planned High Capacity Transit N Planned High Capacity Transit

WILLIS WILLIS

H H T UT U O M SMO 205 S 205 T T $ R %& $ DENVER R %& LOMBARD LOMBARD DENVER O O P P

! ! ! CO 5 COL 5 LU University of UMB University of $ DE MB %& KUM I $ DE A %& KUM I A W Portland W Portland ROSA PARKS ROSA PARKS i i Concordia Concordia 82ND l 82ND l la University lamette River University me ! ! 27TH 27TH

t GREELEY te GREELEY PCC PCC Cascade Cascade R ! ! iv KILLING KILLINGSWORTH 30 SWORTH 30 e #" A #" A A IRPO r IRP N ORT I RT

B ALBERTA 30TH ALBERTA 30TH

L MLK MLK JR A MLK MLK JR ALBINA GOING GOING

R S R S PRE A PRE A 33RD SCOTT N 33RD SCOTT NDY E DY

U Y MS Y P L I

L A L I L S

L U COUVE U

I L C

LLIAMS C

S AN

V W

VAN WI

SSISSIPPI

M MI FREMONT FREMONT Legacy Legacy Emanuel Emanuel Y DY AND 84 ! SAN 84 ! S ! 57TH ! 57TH %&$ %&$ 42ND VAUGHN 42ND VAUGHN 24TH 15TH 24TH THURMAN 15TH THURMAN BROADWAY BROADWAY WEIDLER WEIDLER

Legacy 122ND Legacy 122ND Rose Rose Good Samaritan 18TH Lloyd Good Samaritan 18TH Lloyd Garden Garden Ctr ! Ctr ! HALSEY ! ! HALSEY ! ! Union Union LL ELL Station NE ! Station RN ! OR ! CO ! C Conv

Conv 19TH 19TH

21ST Ctr 23RD 405

21ST Ctr 23RD 405 $ ! %&$ ! %& GLISAN GLISAN Providence Providence 12TH GLISAN 12TH GLISAN 28TH

28TH BURNSIDE Portland M BURNSIDE Portland Mul t n o m a ! u l t n o m a ! h PGE 102ND h PGE 102ND T E 99TH E H 99TH Park BURNSIDE ID Park O BURNSIDE SID RNS G R RN U ILH B BU B U STARK A R Wa shin Washin M g t o n GRAND 39TH g t o n GRAND 39TH N MLK MLK JR MLK MLK JR S STARK TARK MORRISON MORRISON STARK STARK BELMONT BELMONT WA SHINGTON Mall WA SHINGTON Mall 205 205 ! MADISON ! MADISO 20TH N PSU MAIN PSU HAWTHORNE 76TH ! HAWTHORNE 76TH MAIN !

! 162ND 162ND 60TH ! 26 ! #"26 OMSI #" 82ND OMSI ! 82ND Adventist ! Adventist

7TH Medical Center 11TH

7TH Medical Center 11TH PCC PCC

50TH Southeast 50TH Southeast DIVISION ! DIVISION ! 122ND 122ND 148TH CLINTON CLINTON OHSU DIVISION OHSU DIVISION ! ! Shriners ! 21ST Shriners ! 21ST ! ! Doernbecher ! Doernbecher ! ! VA ! Plans for 205 VA ! Plans for 205 POWELL POWELL $ Powell-Foster corridor %& %&$ Medical Medical Powell-Foster corridor Center to be determined Center to be determined

26TH PO 26TH POW WE ELL LL F FO O S ST T E ER HOLGATE R HOLGATE Y RY Plans for BE Plans for R BEAV ERR AVE FE ERT Barbur corridor F RTON Barbur corridor ON S - LS - H LL H to be determined L IL to be determined O IL HO L L SDAL 39TH 28TH S 39TH C

CH 28TH S S DA MI

L MILWAUKIE E HW E HW L Y W Y M 5 M 5

AC 136TH AU %&$ A 136TH %&$ C Reed College A Reed College KI A

D D ! E ! ! A AM WOODSTOCK M WOODSTOCK

B B E E R R T TH H FOSTER FOSTER A A BYBEE BYBEE Plans for Plans for Lake Oswego-to-Portland Lake Oswego-to-Portland corridor to be determined corridor to be determined 32ND 32ND MULT M NOMAH Y ULTNOMAH Y R 52ND 52ND R FLAVEL RR FLAVEL G AR E G E D

A E 13TH RD N F EN 13TH HO HO F ME ME RS RS LO O AY TACOMA TAYL TACOMA T

Y 72ND

W 72ND

HWY R R L U U B B O R

R T A A I B B M u l t n o m a h P M u l t n o m a h

CAPITOL TERWILLIGER TERWILLIGER C l a c k a m a s C l a c k a m a s

! ! ! Lewis & Clark Lewis & Clark Lewis & Clark College Lewis & Clark College School of Law School of Law ! ! ! ! ! Providence Providence Milwaukie Milwaukie

Y RY RR R FE ! FE PCC ! S PCC ! ES NE ON Sylvania O Sylvania BO BO 82ND 82ND Clackamas Clackamas Town Center Town Center ! ! ! ! ! Kaiser ! Kaiser ! Sunnyside Sunnyside 1 0 1 2 3 Miles 1 0 1 2 3 Miles K:\25696596_CoP_Streetcar_System_Plan\MXDs\Final_Report\Ph2B_simpl_lett.mxd 1:95040 K:\25696596_CoP_Streetcar_System_Plan\MXDs\Final_Report\Ph3_simpl_lett.mxd 1:95040 #$ Streetcar System Plan DISTRICT WORKING GROUP CORRIDOR EVALUATION

TOP RATED CORRIDORS PER DISTRICT SURVEYS

OTHER SURVEY RESULTS AND DWG SYSTEM RECOMMENDATIONS !" "#$% &" &'(%) &'(%)*+$% ,-. /+'/0+12'3/0+%+41%)+1$5(6+78 --9 /+'/0+12'3/0+%+41%)+1$5(6+78 :9;1/+'/0+12'3/0+%+41%)+1$5(6+781 <.:1/+'/0+12'3/0+%+41%)+1$5(6+78 ,=,1/+'/0+12'3/0+%+41%)+1$5(6+78

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treetcar System Plan SAC CORRIDOR EVALUATION

RECOMMENDED CORRIDORS

City of Portland Phase 3A SAC Workshop (*

Existing Transit Existing/Planned HCT C l a r k TriMet Bus Routes Existing Streetcar Jantzen M u l t n o m a h (as of 2008) Beach Planned Streetcar Frequent Bus Service Potential Streetcar to be Considered in HCT Study Prop. Streetcar System MAX Light Rail $ North W A S H I N G T O N (Existing/Under Construction) SAC First Priority Planned High Capacity Transit FESSENDEN O R E G O N ST LOUIS !# $!" " / 449 . SAC Second Priority (HCT) to be Studied by Region (<6;<6>B 3<2645> 6:<;@2:2>= >; ;9?:06 ;<<6;< Portland Aerial Tram Portland International (* Airport Boundaries Primary Anchors ST JOHNS BRIDGE WILLIS Boundaries M u l t n o m a h City Center, 205 Regional Centers, W a s h i n g t o n LOMBARD DENVER Northeast City of Portland PORTSMOUTH Town Centers

5 COLUMBIA PCC University of DEKUM Rock Creek Portland Secondary Anchors ROSA PARKS Concordia University 82ND Other Cities Main Streets

27TH GREELEY PCC Major Institutions Cascade Other Areas within UGB Hospitals KILLINGSWORTH 30 Colleges/Universities AIRPORT Areas Outside of UGB Shopping/Other

ALBERTA 30TH

ALBINA MLK JR Station Areas GOING CULLY

M FREMONT PRESCOTT SANDY 33RD Note: Central City inset does not yet reflect new 15 $ 6 $: ; )3 + " or adjusted corridors from Phase I screening. Phase 3 of this study, incorporating both the technical 50 *;?>5 -1;?@2< .6996:= Central City Remaining original PTI corridors are shown. VANCOUVER WILLIAMS :?29 ;=6>9 <2 9=; data analysis and public input from Phase 2, will arrange the Legacy MISSISSIPPI FREMONT 1;=62<>6;= Emanuel Legacy highest performing Phase 2 corridors into several system scenarios. Emanuel ! ! 9;- 4 ; SANDY 84 57TH >; ;99BA;; +<=6> 2>2< KNOTT 42ND WILLIAMS MLKJR VAUGHN 24TH 5 THURMAN 15TH BROADWAY WEIDLER

Legacy Rose 122ND

Good Samaritan 18TH Lloyd &22 3?<>52< 2@9?>6; ;3 1;<<6;<= 3<;: !7 Garden Ctr VAUGHN INTERSTATE " & 9; #99 HALSEY "9;25 ; )3 Union Station @6 29:;>*><8 .=564>; CORNELL THURMAN Conv 19TH

21ST Ctr 23RD 405 SAVIER VANCOUVER BROADWAY GLISAN & 9; 6 30 GLISAN 12TH Providence

QUIMBY BURNSIDE 28TH Portland >; 1>9BC2 2@29;:2> WEIDLER

PGE THORBURN 102ND Park 99TH BURNSIDE CORNELL Legacy GILHAM BURNSIDE Rose Lloyd STARK Good Samaritan 18TH GRAND 39TH Garden Center MLK JR STARK MORRISON STARK BELMONT WASHINGTON Mall Providence 205 St. Vincent

MADISON 20TH PSU MAIN HAWTHORNE 76TH 60TH Union 162ND Station 26

OMSI 82ND 405 Conv Adventist 19TH 23RD 21ST

Ctr 7TH Medical Center 11TH LINCOLN PCC

50TH Southeast 84 DIVISION

122ND CLINTON 148TH OHSU DIVISION $ <6;<6>B ;@2< & Shriners 21ST 12TH BURNSIDE Doernbecher VA Plans for 205 POWELL Powell corridor PGE Park Medical Center to be determined POWELL West 26TH

FOSTER 72ND

HOLGATE 18TH NAITO BEAVERTON - Plans for

GRAND Barbur corridor

MLKJR East HILLSDALE HWY to be determined 39TH 11TH SCHOLLS FERRY 28TH

MORRISON MILWAUKIE 10TH

BELMONT 5 MACADAM

136TH Reed College JEFFERSON COLUMBIA WOODSTOCK BERTHA 111TH +<=3;<: * (;<>9 2=> ;3 $2>= A6>5 % PSU MADISON FOSTER HAWTHORNE BYBEE Plans for Southeast Lake Oswego-to-Portland corridor to be determined " 99 +9 " MULTNOMAH 32ND

52ND @6 29:;> ;=>2< 26 FLAVEL GARDEN HOME OMSI FERRY 13TH TAYLORS TACOMA 7TH 11TH 72ND $: 449 ! 2 M u l t n o m a h BARBUR

CAPITOL HWY

TERWILLIGER C l a c k a m a s $

Lewis & Clark OHSU Lewis & Clark College Shriners POWELL School of Law !# $!" Providence Milwaukie Doernbecher (* BARBUR VA 0 0.5 1 Mile Medical Center PCC Sylvania BOONES FERRY 82ND Clackamas Town Center CITY OF Kaiser Sunnyside N BUREAU OF 101230.5 Miles

To Damascus Town Center

K:\25696596_CoP_Streetcar_System_Plan\MXDs\Screen_3\workshops\Ph3A1SAC_011509.mxd 1:95040

HOW DID THE SYSTEM ADVISORY COMMITTEE (SAC) DEVELOP THIS MAP?

The SAC held a workshop on January 15, 2009 to review and evaluate the potential streetcar corridor recommendations from the North, Northeast, Southeast, East and Northwest District Working Groups. Also considered were the to preliminary system concept ideas previously developed by the DOTT, City sta! and the project team.

The challenge for the SAC was to develop their own system concept that balanced the DWG recommendations with the technical merits of the highest performing corridors illustrated on the Phase 2B Corridor Evaluation map. Streetcar System Plan PHASE 3A SCREEN

The Phase 3A screening combined the recommendations from the SAC, input from the District Working Groups and the DOTT. Corridors were identi" ed that would best meet the following goals:

• Demonstrating community support for a candidate streetcar corridor. • Help the City achieve its peak oil and sustainability strategies. • Provide an organizing structure and catalyst for the City’s future growth along main streets and streetcar corridors. • Help preserve the character of the City’s existing neighborhoods.

PHASE 3A Phase 3 Screen Diagram Streetcar System Existing/Planned Streetcar

Cl Potential System Existing Streetcar a r k Jantzen M u Route or Corridor Beach ! l t n o Planned Streetcar ma h WA S Columbia Ri ve H IN r OR G EG T O N Existing Transit Existing/Planned HCT O N TriMet Bus Routes MAX Light Rail IS OU L FES ST SE (April 2009) (Existing/Under Construction) ND EN Planned High Capacity Transit

Portland International (HCT) to be Studied by Region Airport ! Frequent Bus Service Portland Aerial Tram

WILLIS

OUT SM %&$205 LOMBARD DENVER ORT P

! ! C 5 OLUM University of %&$ DEKUM BI A W Portland ROSA PARKS illamette Concordia University 82ND !! 27TH

GREELEY PCC Cascade R !! iver KILLINGSWORTH #"30 AIRP ORT

ALBERTA 30TH MLK MLK JR ALBINA GOING

PRESCOTT SA 33RD NDY

Y L UL C

VANCOUVER WILLIAMS

MISSISSIPPI FREMONT Legacy Emanuel DY ! AN 84 ! 57TH S %&$

VAUGHN 42ND 24TH THURMAN 15TH BROADWAY WEIDLER

Legacy 122ND Rose

Good Samaritan 18TH Lloyd Garden Ctr ! !! ! HALSEY L Union EL RN ! Station CO ! Conv 19TH Ctr 21ST

23RD 405 %&$ !! GLISAN Providence 12TH GLISAN

BURNSIDE 28TH Portland M ult n o m a h ! PGE T 102ND IDE Park H 99TH BURNSIDE NS G OR UR IL B B H U Wa s h i n g t STARK AM R on GRAND 39TH N

MLK MLK JR STARK MORRISON STARK BELMONT WASHINGTON Mall 205 ! MADISON 20TH PSU MAIN !! HAWTHORNE 76TH #"26 !! 162ND OMSI 82ND Adventist ! Medical Center 7TH 11TH PCC

50TH Southeast DIVISION !! 122ND CLINTON 148TH OHSU DIVISION !! Shriners !! 21ST !! Doernbecher !! VA !! Plans for 205 POWELL %&$ Medical Powell-Foster corridor Center to be determined

26TH POWE LL FO S TE HOLGATE R RY Plans for R BEAV FE ERT Barbur corridor S ON L - H L IL to be determined HO L S 39TH

C 28TH S DA LE MI H

WY L 5 MA W 136TH %&$ AU C Reed College A

E !! AM WOODSTOCK

THA FOSTER BYBEE Plans for Lake Oswego-to-Portland corridor to be determined 32ND MULTNO MAH Y 52ND FLAVEL G RR ARD E EN 13TH HOME F RS LO TAY TACOMA 72ND

R U B R A B M u l t n o m a h

CAPITOLHWY TERWILLIGER C l a c k a m a s

! ! Lewis & Clark Lewis & Clark College School of Law !! !! Providence Milwaukie

RY ER PCC !! S F Sylvania BOONE 82ND Clackamas Town Center ! ! ! Kaiser ! Sunnyside 1 0 1 2 3 Miles

K:\25696596_CoP_Streetcar_System_Plan\MXDs\Final_Report\Ph3A_simpl_lett.mxd 1:95040 !! Streetcar System Plan

PHASE 3B ! DRAFT STREETCAR SYSTEM CORRIDORS

The Phase 3B process ranked and prioritized the Phase 3A corridors into two tiers based on the following factors:

• System Advisory Committee (SAC) recommendations and input of District Working Groups (DWG). • Preliminary transit ridership modeling results. • Previous technical corridor evaluation process. • Ability to shape/catalyze future Main Street growth (development).

PHASE 3B

DRAFTPhase 3 Screen Diagram Streetcar Corridors Existing/Planned Streetcar

Cl Tier 1 Corridor Existing Streetcar a rk Jantzen M u Beach ! l t no Tier 2 Corridor Planned Streetcar m a h Alignment Alternative W A SH Columb ia R iver I N O R G T O Existing Transit Existing/Planned HCT E GON N TriMet Bus Routes MAX Light Rail S UI FE (April 2009) (Existing/Under Construction) ST LO SSEND EN Planned High Capacity Transit

Portland International (HCT) to be Studied by Region L OM Airport BA RD ! Frequent Bus Service Portland Aerial Tram

WILLIS

H T U O 205 M S Lombard $

DENVER %& T R O P

! ! CO 5 LUM University of $ DEKUM BI %& A Willa Portland ROSA PARKS Concordia University 82ND !! m MLK Jr ette Rive GREELEY PCC 27TH Cascade ! ! KILLINGSWORTH #"30 r AIRP ORT

ALBERTA 30TH

ALBINA GOING

PRESCOTT SAN 33RD DY

LLY U C

WILLIAMS

VANCOUVER

MISSISSIPPI FREMONT Legacy Emanuel !! %&$84 24TH 15TH ndy MLK MLK JR Sa VAUGHN 42ND THURMAN Broadway 122ND Legacy 57TH Rose Good Samaritan 18TH Garden !Lloyd !! ! Ctr Weidler HALSEY LL Union NE ! Station OR ! C Conv 19TH 405 Ctr 21ST 23RD %&$ Y !! ND GLISAN Burnsi de SA

12TH Providence GLISAN

28TH Portland Mu BURNSIDE 102nd l t n o m a h E PGE ! SID 99TH BURNSIDE RN Park BU Wa s h i n g t o n JEF Stark F GRAND ER MLK JR SO Belmont C N MORRISON STARK ol umb Mall ia Washington 205 MADISON ! PSU Hawthorn e !! 76TH MAIN ! 162ND #"26 39th !

OMSI 82ND ! Adventist

7TH Medical Center 11TH PCC Southeast DIVISION 50th !!

OHSU DIVISION 148TH ! Shriners !! ! 21ST !! Doernbecher !! VA !! Plans for 205 POWELL $ Powell-Foster corridor %& Medical Center to be determined P 26TH OWE LL

HOLGATE RY Plans for R BEAVERT FE O Barbur corridor N - Fo HILL to be determined HOLLS s SD 39TH t SC A 28TH er

L MILWAUKIE E H nd W MAC Y 5 %&$ 136TH ADAM Reed College 122 !! WOODSTOCK

VERMONT BE

RTHA FOSTER BYBEE Plans for Lake Oswego-to-Portland corridor to be determined 32ND

MULTNOMAH Y

R 52ND

R FLAVEL

G 13TH A E RDEN HOME F RS Tacoma LO TAY 72ND

UR RB A B

PITOLHWY M u l t n o m a h

CA TERWILLIGER C l a c k a m a s

! ! Lewis & Clark Lewis & Clark College School of Law !! !! Providence Milwaukie

RY ER PCC !! S F Sylvania BOONE 82ND Clackamas Town Center !

!! Kaiser ! Sunnyside 1 0 1 2 3 Miles

K:\25696596_CoP_Streetcar_System_Plan\MXDs\Final_Report\Ph3B_Plan_simpl_rev1.mxd 1:95040

!" Streetcar System Plan

PHASE 3B ! TIER 1 STREETCAR ROUTE CONCEPTS

In order to see how an expanded streetcar system could function and in order to gauge ridership potential, route concepts were developed for each of the Phase 3B Tier 1 corridors shown in the previous map. Factors used to develop the route concepts included: • Maximizing connectivity between major origins and destinations (including regional centers, town centers and designated main streets) and with existing or planned transit services. • Maximizing directness and reliability of streetcar operations. • Minimizing duplication with existing or planned transit services. • Balancing use of public right-of-way with other transportation modes. • Balancing investments in a geographically equitable way.

PHASE 3B - TIER 1 ROUTE CONCEPTS

DRAFPhaseT 3 Screen Diagram Potential Routes Existing/Planned Streetcar Lomb MLK Riverplace C Existing Streetcar l a rk Thur Lovj Bdwy Weidlr Jantzen M u l t n Beach ! Planned Streetcar om NW PSU LO Tacoma ah Burnside Sandy W A S H I N G T Jeff Col Bel Haw Fostr Columbia Ri ver O RE Gateway Montav Loop Existing/Planned HCT G O N O N Central City Loop MAX Light Rail Route Alternatives UIS LO T FES (Existing/Under Construction) S SE ND EN Existing Transit Planned High Capacity Transit

Portland International TriMet Bus Routes (HCT) to be Studied by Region L OM Airport BA RD ! (April 2009) Portland Aerial Tram

WILLIS

TH U 205 MO Lomb $ DENVER ard %& TS R O P

! ! C 5 OLU University of $ DEKUM MBI %& A W Portland ROSA PARKS i Concordia ll University 82ND a !! me MLK Jr t te GREELEY PCC 27TH R Cascade !! K iv ILLINGSWORTH #"30 e r AIRP ORT

ALBERTA 30TH

ALBINA GOING

PRESCOTT SAN 33RD DY

Y L L U C

WILLIAMS

VANCOUVER

MISSISSIPPI FREMONT Legacy Emanuel !! %&$84 24TH 15TH y nd MLK MLK JR Sa VAUGHN 42ND THURMAN Broadway 122ND Legacy 57TH Rose

Good Samaritan 18TH Garden !Lloyd !! ! Ctr Weidler HALSEY LL Union NE ! Station OR ! C Conv 19TH 405 Ctr 21ST 23RD %&$ Y !! D N GLISAN nd SA Burnside 2

12TH Providence GLISAN

28TH Portland M ul BURNSIDE 1 t n o m ah E PGE ! SID 99TH BURNSIDE RN Park BU Wa s h i n g t o JEF Stark n F GRAND ER MLK JR SO Belmont C N MORRISON STARK ol um Mall bi 205 a Washington ! MADISON h PSU t Hawthorne 76TH MAIN

!! 9 ! 162ND #"26 3 !

OMSI 82ND ! Adventist

7TH Medical Center 11TH t PCC 0 Southeast DIVISION 5 !!

OHSU DIVISION 148TH ! Shriners !! ! 21ST !! Doernbecher !! VA !! Plans for 205 POWELL $ Powell-Foster corridor %& Medical Center to be determined P 26TH OW ELL

HOLGATE RY BE Plans for ER AVER F TON Barbur corridor Fo LS - HI L to be determined HOL L st S 39TH

d SC DAL 28TH er

MILWAUKIE E n H W MACADAM Y 5 2

2 %&$ 136TH Reed College 1 !! WOODSTOCK

VERMONT BERTH

FOSTER A BYBEE Plans for Lake Oswego-to-Portland corridor to be determined 32ND MULTNOMAH 52ND FLAVEL

G 13TH A ERRY RDEN HOME F RS Taco LO ma TAY 72ND

R U B R A B M u l t n o m a h

CAPITOLHWY TERWILLIGER C l a c k a m a s

! ! Lewis & Clark Lewis & Clark College School of Law !! !! Providence Milwaukie

RY ! FER PCC ! ES ON Sylvania BO 82ND Clackamas Town Center !

!! Kaiser ! Sunnyside 1 0 1 2 3 Miles

K:\25696596_CoP_Streetcar_System_Plan\MXDs\Final_Report\Ph3B_RouteConcepts_simpl_rev1.mxd 1:95040 !# Streetcar System Plan FUNDING CAN COME FROM MANY SOURCES

PORTLAND STREETCAR PHASE 1 (OPENED 2001) HUD Interest Tax Breaks Agreement $.5 $.3 $.8 ST Railcar Procurement Parking Reserve $.2 $2.0 Portland Streetcar Phase 1 Funding Parking Garage Bonds $28.5 Federal Local Improvement District $9.6 $5.0 TIF $7.5 Federal $5.0 TIF Parking Reserve $2.0 $7.5 Tax Breaks Agreement $.8 HUD $.5 Interest $.3 ST Railcar Procurement $.2

Local Improvement District Total Capital Cost = $54.5 $9.6

Parking Garage Bonds $28.5 PORTLAND STREETCAR SOUTH WATERFRONT (OPENED 2007) Gibbs Extension Tram Transfer Savings $.2 $.7 Transportation Fund Portland Streetcar So. Waterfront Funding HUD $.6 Tax Increment (N Macadam URA) $14 $1.5 Misc. Regional Transportation Funds $10 Connect Oregon $.9 Local Improvement District $9.8 Transportation Land Sale $3.1 $2.1 Tax Increment Transportation System Development Charges $2.5 $14 Connect Oregon $2.1 HUD Grants $1.5 Trans. Development Charges Miscellanous $.9 $2.5 Gibbs Extenstion Savings $.7 Transportation Fund $.6 Trans. Land Sale Tram Transfer $.2 $3.1 Total Capital Cost = $45.4

Local Improvement District $9.8 Regional Trans. Funds $10 PORTLAND STREETCAR LOOP (EST. OPENING 2011) System Development District Regional Funds $6 $4 Local Improvement District Portland Streetcar Loop Funding $15 Federal $75 PDC (Urban Renewal Fund) $27 Vehicles from State of Oregon $20 Local Improvement District $15 System Development Changes $6 Regional Funds $4 Vehicles from State of Oregon $20 Total Capital Cost = $147

PDC (Urban Renewal Fund) Federal $27 SEATTLE STREETCAR (OPENED 2007) $75 State Local Improvement District $3.0 $25.7

Surplus Property $8.5 Seattle Streetcar Funding Local Improvement District $25.7 Federal $14.9 Surplus Property $8.5 State $3.0

Federal Total Capital Cost = $52.1 $14.9

TAMPA STREETCAR (OPENED 2003) Various Sources Tampa Streetcar Funding $9.6 Federal CMAQ Federal CMAQ $14.3 Tampa Direct Contribution (Gas Taxes) $13.9 State Intermodal Funds $14.3 Federal 5307 Urbanized Area Formula $6.9 $3.8 Federal 5309 New Starts/Capital Transit $5.0 Local Land Sale Proceeds $4.2 State Intermodal Funds $3.8 Various Sources $9.6 Federal TSCP (2.0) State DDR (1.2) State CMAQ (1.1) Federal STP (1.0) State Urban Transit Funds (1.0) Local Land Sale Proceeds HART (Local Transit Agency) (.9) $4.2 State DDR (.8) Tampa Direct Contribution State Intermodal Funds (.5) State Fast Track (.4) $13.9 State Public Transit Funds (.3) Local Impact Fees (.3) Local City Rail Contribution (.05) Federal 5309 New Starts/Capital Transit Federal 5307 Urbanized Area Formula Local Port Authority (.05) $5.0 $6.9 Total Capital Cost = $57.7 !$ Streetcar System Plan HOW LONG WILL IT TAKE?

TYPICAL CORRIDOR DEVELOPMENT SCHEDULE

Under the current Federal funding program, each streetcar corridor will need to advance individually as a separate project. Each project will undergo an Alternatives Analysis to determine the best mode of transit service to meet the needs of the community and to warrant Federal funding.

Currently, Congressman Earl Blumenauer is leading an e# ort to craft a better Federal funding program designed to expedite the Federal approval process and foster the development of modern streetcar communities. This new funding mechanism, and its streamlined Federal approval process has the potential to reduce overall project costs.

The time-line below approximates the current time-frame for a streetcar project to move through the planning, design and construction phases.

Typical Timeframe for Streetcar Corridor Project (3 to 5 miles) (Assumes Current Federal Funding Process) Months 12 24 36 48-60 Alternatives Analysis Environmental and Engineering Construction Preliminary Design Tasks Public involvement Public involvement Public involvement Public involvement Analyze appropriate Environmental Final design Construction mode documentation Cost estimating Quality assurance monitoring Transit modeling Preliminary design Project cost controls Project cost controls Ridership forecasting Cost estimating Vehicle procurement Vehicle delivery Concept design Operations planning Federal funding Local funding strategy application Federal funding approvals

CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE

Downtown streetcar construction work time averaged 3 weeks per 3-block construction segment.

!% Streetcar System Plan STREETCAR CORRIDOR CHARACTERISTICS

Cross Section of Historic Streetcar Neighborhoods Original Streetcar Corridors Several potential corridors under consideration were some of Portland’s original streetcar lines. Existing Parking Lot

Existing urban form

Urban form with modern streetcar

Cross Section of Newer Neighborhoods Automobile/Arterial Corridors Other potential corridors were originally built and developed during the latter half of the 20th century. Streetcars help focus in-! ll development and growth in streetcar corridors.

Existing urban form

Urban form with modern streetcar

Building form will be an essential means to shape new development along a streetcar corridor to provide a compatible relationship of building heights and massing with surrounding neighborhoods.

Building stepbacks are an essential architectural tool for minimizing the eff ect of adding higher density structures adjacent to lower density land uses. Community design guidelines and neighborhood plans can defi ne the framework for infi ll development and ensure that it fi ts into existing neighborhoods and respects existing neighborhood character.

50 by 100-foot infi ll in Commercial Storefront 50 by 200-foot infi ll in Commercial Storefront 100 by 100-foot infi ll in Central Commercial zone zone (CS) at 45-feet in building height. zone (CS) at 45-feet in building height. (CX) at 75-feet in building height. Building form is particularly important for infi ll development. " e above drawings illustrate 3 examples of adding context sensitive higher density mixed-use structures in three diff erent commercial zones. !& Streetcar System Plan CORRIDOR IMPLEMENTATION

Next Steps: Financing t Initiate process for Federal grant applications t Research wide range of local match options

Neighborhood Context t Coordinate with BPS/Portland Plan to: t Explore urban form, development and livability issues within streetcar corridors t Strategize mixed-income housing opportunities in future streetcar neighborhoods

Modal Coordination t Develop streetcar corridor design guidelines to optimize compatibility with bicycle, pedestrian, freight, transit and vehicle users t Evaluate demand management strategies

Corridor Infrastructure t Develop strategy to coordinate sustainable infrastructure in future streetcar corridors

Corridor Planning Process t Develop collaborative framework with TriMet, Metro and ODOT for streetcar corridor planning, !nancing, implementation, and operations t Develop process to engage Neighborhood Associations and other stakeholders in corridor planning and implementation Streetcar System Plan FINISHING THE PLAN

Schedule: May 2009 t Public Open Houses t Complete ridership modeling t Re!ne the plan

June 2009 t Draft Final Streetcar System Plan Report t System Advisory Committee recommendations

June/July 2009 t Draft Report Public Comment Period

July 2009 t Planning Commission Hearing (July 14 – tentative)

August 2009 t City Council Hearing (August 12 – tentative)