DOCSLIB.ORG

2015 DRAFT Park SDC Capital Plan 150412.Xlsx

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2015 DRAFT Park SDC Capital Plan 150412.Xlsx 2015 PARK SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE 20‐YEAR CAPITAL PLAN (SUMMARY) April 2015 As required by ORS 223.309 Portland Parks and Recreation maintains a list of capacity increasing projects intended to TYPES OF PROJECTS THAT INCREASE CAPACITY: address the need created by growth. These projects are eligible to be funding with Park SDC revenue . The total value of Land acquisition projects summarized below exceeds the potential revenue of $552 million estimated by the 2015 Park SDC Methodology and Develop new parks on new land the funding from non-SDC revenue targeted for growth projects. Expand existing recreation facilities, trails, play areas, picnic areas, etc The project list and capital plan is a "living" document that, per ORS 223.309 (2), maybe modified at anytime. It should be Increase playability, durability and life of facilities noted that potential modifications to the project list will not impact the fee since the fee is not based on the project list, but Develop and improve parks to withstand more intense and extended use rather the level of service established by the adopted Park SDC Methodology. Construct new or expand existing community centers, aquatic facilities, and maintenance facilities Increase capacity of existing community centers, aquatic facilities, and maintenance facilities ELIGIBLE PROJECTS POTENTIAL REVENUE TOTAL PARK SDC ELIGIBLE CAPACITY INCREASING PROJECTS 20‐year Total SDC REVENUE CATEGORY SDC Funds Other Revenue Total 2015‐35 TOTAL Park SDC Eligible City‐Wide Capacity Increasing Projects 566,640,621 City‐Wide 302,607,596 38,903,792 341,511,388 TOTAL Park SDC Eligible Central City Capacity Increasing Projects 143,555,597 Central City 118,699,111 15,260,177 133,959,288 TOTAL Park SDC Eligible Non‐Central City Capacity Increasing Projects 183,479,050 Non‐Central City 130,679,758 16,800,431 147,480,189 TOTAL PARK SDC ELIGIBLE CAPACITY INCREASING PROJECTS $893,675,267 TOTAL ALL CATEGORIES $551,986,465 $70,964,400 $622,950,865 CITY‐WIDE FACILITIES ACQUISITION & DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS Park SDC Eligible City‐Wide Capacity Increasing Projects TOTAL FY2015‐16 FY2016‐17 FY2017‐18 FY2018‐19 FY2020‐25 FY2026‐35 City Wide Access Parks ‐Land Acquisition (Opportunity and Willing Seller Based) 37,800,080 0 0 0 6,500,000 31,300,080 0 ‐New Park Development on New or Undeveloped Land 59,021,804 0 0 2,000,000 1,500,000 6,500,000 49,021,804 ‐Capacity Increasing Improvements in Existing Parks 85,517,000 0 0 0 2,739,000 9,787,000 72,991,000 Trails ‐Trail Acquisition (Based on Opportunity and Willing Seller) 2,114,238 0 0 0 0 1,057,119 1,057,119 ‐Trail Development 36,719,956 0 0 3,049,000 746,247 30,924,709 2,000,000 Natural Areas ‐Natural Area Acquisition (Based on Opportunity and Willing Seller) 26,650,792 0 0 0 0 13,325,396 13,325,396 ‐Natural Area Restoration 8,315,465 0 0 0 0 2,524,446 5,791,019 Maintenance Facility Expansion 23,348,327 0 2,398,327 0 0 10,950,000 10,000,000 Community Centers and Aquatic Facility Expansion 287,152,959 0 0 0 0 161,776,959 125,376,000 TOTAL Park SDC Eligible City‐Wide Capacity Increasing Projects $566,640,621 $0 $2,398,327 $5,049,000 $11,485,247 $268,145,709 $279,562,338 CENTRAL CITY FACILITIES ACQUISITION & DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS Park SDC Eligible Central City Capacity Increasing Projects TOTAL FY2015‐16 FY2016‐17 FY2017‐18 FY2018‐19 FY2020‐25 FY2026‐35 Land Acquisition (Opportunity and Willing Seller Based) 63,899,076 500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 58,899,076 0 New Park Development on New or Undeveloped Land 79,356,521 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 4,000,000 0 72,356,521 Capacity Increasing Improvements in Existing Parks 300,000 0 0 0 0 0 300,000 TOTAL Park SDC Eligible Central City Capacity Increasing Projects $143,555,597 $1,500,000 $2,500,000 $2,500,000 $5,500,000 $58,899,076 $72,656,521 NON‐CENTRAL CITY FACILITIES ACQUISITION & DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS Park SDC Eligible Non‐Central City Capacity Increasing Projects TOTAL FY2015‐16 FY2016‐17 FY2017‐18 FY2018‐19 FY2020‐25 FY2026‐35 Land Acquisition (Opportunity and Willing Seller Based) 39,042,190 500,000 500,000 500,000 3,203,809 34,338,381 0 New Park Development on New or Undeveloped Land 74,563,390 2,118,627 2,500,000 4,500,000 0 33,817,585 29,627,179 Capacity Increasing Improvements in Existing Parks 69,873,469 375,000 250,000 1,000,000 15,932,621 23,299,617 29,016,232 TOTAL Park SDC Eligible Non‐Central City Capacity Increasing Projects $183,479,050 $2,993,627 $3,250,000 $6,000,000 $19,136,430 $91,455,582 $58,643,410 April 2015 2015 Park SDC 20‐year Capital Plan Summary 1 of 7 2015 PARK SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE 20‐YEAR CAPITAL PLAN (DETAILED) April 2015 The following list of detailed projects are primarily developed through Portland Parks and Recreation's 20-year Capital Project Planning Process as defined in the Capital Project Rating and Budgeting Summary , April 2, 2015. The 20-year Capital Project List includes all anticipated PP&R capital projects to address growth. Specific funding of individual projects will vary depending on partnership or grant opportunites; However, over the life of the Park SDC program it is the intent that 89% of the projects will be funded with Park SDCs and 11% from other sources.Capital projects to be undertaken in the the 1-5 year timeframe are identified in the PP&R Adopted Budget. Some of the projects are eligible for funding with Park SDC revenue, but due to the general uncertainty of the amount of SDC revenue few growth projects are budgeted for expenditure beyond the 1-2 year timeline. Timing of the projects may be adjusted as community priorities, opportunites for partnerships, and actual revenues are realized. CITY WIDE FACILITIES ACQUISITION & DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS TOTAL FY2015‐16 FY2016‐17 FY2017‐18 FY2018‐19 FY2020‐25 FY2026‐35 Total Estimated Park Acquisition (Opportunity & Willing Seller) $37,800,080 $0 $0 $0 $6,500,000 $31,300,080 $0 Rose Quarter/Colisium Waterfront South Waterfront (ZRZ Yards) Northwest/Waterfront East of Forest Park Leach Garden Expansion Total Estimated New Park Development $59,021,804 $0 $0 $2,000,000 $1,500,000 $6,500,000 $49,021,804 Rose Quarter/Colisium Waterfront Park Waterfront South Waterfront (ZRZ Yards 3‐4 Acres) Ross Island Bridge Park Northwest Waterfront North Park Block Extension (Block 511 Development) East of Forest Park Total Estimated Capacity Increasing Improvements $85,517,000 $0 $0 $0 $2,739,000 $9,787,000 $72,991,000 Waterfront Park Bowl to Hawthorn Bridge Waterfront Park Burnside to Steel Waterfront Park Morrison to Ash Waterfront Park Hawthorn to Salmon Waterfront Park Salmon to Morrison Delta Park Synthetic Fields convert remaining fields + Lights Destination Play Area (Existing East Parks TBD) Destination Play Area (Existing Northeast Park TBD) Destination play site (Existing Southeast Park TBD) Destination play site (Existing Southwest Park TBD) Duniway Park Synthetic Soccer Field Japanese Garden Expansion Leach Garden Expansion Synthetic Turf Field conversion (Existing NW Park TBD) Synthetic Turf Field conversion (Existing East Parks TBD) Synthetic Turf Field conversion (Existing North Park TBD) Synthetic Turf Field conversion (Existing Southeast Park TBD) Synthetic Turf Field conversion (Existing Southwest Park TBD) Total Estimated Trail Land Acquisition $2,114,238 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,057,119 $1,057,119 Total Estimated Trail Development $36,719,956 $0 $0 $3,049,000 $746,247 $30,924,709 $2,000,000 Marine Drive Trail Grant Match Trail Bridge over Columbia Blvd Grant Match April 2015 2015 Park SDC 20‐year Capital Plan Summary 2 of 7 CITY WIDE FACILITIES ACQUISITION & DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS TOTAL FY2015‐16 FY2016‐17 FY2017‐18 FY2018‐19 FY2020‐25 FY2026‐35 Total Estimated Trail Development Projects (continued) Bridgeton Trail Development Red Electric PBOT Trail Grant Match Red Electric Trail future Development Springwater Trail Trailhead SE 136th Springwater Trail Trailhead SE 82nd Springwater Trail Trailhead SE Foster at Light Rail Stop Spriingwater Bridge connection to Brooklyn Neighborhood Forest Park Trailhead North Portland Greenway (15% Match+10%PM) Segment 1 Segment 2 Segment 3 Segment 4 Segment 5 Sullivan's Gulch Segment 1 Segment 2 Segment II Willamette Greenway expansion Johns Landing to Powers Marine Willamette Greenway expansion Land to Riverforum (25%) Total Estimated Natural Area Land Acquisition $26,650,792 $0 $0 $0 $0 $13,325,396 $13,325,396 Columbia Slough Watershed Fanno Creek Watershed Tryon Creek Watershed Johnson Creek Watershed Willamette River Watershed Buttes Natural Area Total Estimated Natural Area Restoration $8,315,465 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,524,446 $5,791,019 Ash Creek NA Master Plan Implementation Beggars‐Tick Connectivity Fanno Creek Natural Area Restoration Forest Park Restoration Forest Park Restoration ‐ NIN Grant Match Fulton Park Forest Restoration Woods Memorial NA Trail expansion per 2000 plan Restore 30% of Habitat in Poor Condition Restore 50% of Severely Degraded Habitat Total Maintenance Facilities Expansion $23,348,327 $0 $2,398,327 $0 $0 $10,950,000 $10,000,000 New Community Garden Center Mt. Tabor Yard Replacement (Estimated Expansion poriton only) Urban Forestry Headquarters (partial SDC) Total Community and Aquatic Centers Expansion $287,152,959 $0 $0 $0 $0 $161,776,959 $125,376,000 New Facility Development Central City/NW Community Center Northeast/Cully Community Center Outer East CC & Aquatics Facility Parklane park Outdoor Aquatics Facility April 2015 2015 Park SDC 20‐year Capital Plan Summary 3 of 7 CITY WIDE FACILITIES ACQUISITION & DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS TOTAL FY2015‐16 FY2016‐17 FY2017‐18 FY2018‐19 FY2020‐25 FY2026‐35 Community and Aquatic Centers Expansion (continued) Washington Monroe Community Center Capacity Increasing Facility Expansion Columbia Pool Play Features Montavilla CC Renovation and Expansion (Estimated Expansion Portion only) St.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • WORKING DOCDRAFT Charter Directors Handbook .Docx
    PPS Resource Guide A guide for new arrivals to Portland and the Pacific Northwest PPS Resource Guide PPS Resource Guide Portland Public Schools recognizes the diversity and worth of all individuals and groups and their roles in society. It is the policy of the Portland Public Schools Board of Education that there will be no discrimination or harassment of individuals or groups on the grounds of age, color, creed, disability, marital status, national origin, race, religion, sex or sexual orientation in any educational programs, activities or employment. 3 PPS Resource Guide Table of Contents How to Use this Guide ....................................................................................................................6 About Portland Public Schools (letter from HR) ...............................................................................7 Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................................8 Cities, Counties and School Districts .............................................................................................. 10 Multnomah County .............................................................................................................................. 10 Washington County ............................................................................................................................. 10 Clackamas County ...............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Download PDF File Parks Capital and Planning Investments
    SWNI Commissioner Amanda Fritz Interim Director Kia Selley INVESTMENTS IN SOUTHWEST NEIGHBORHOODS, INC. ANNOUNCED 2013-2018 August 2018 | Since 2013, Commissioner Amanda Fritz and Portland Parks & Recreation (PP&R) have allocated over $38M in park planning and capital investments in the Southwest Neighborhoods, Inc. coalition area. Funded by System Development Charges (SDCs), the Parks Replacement Bond (Bond), General Fund (GF), and in some cases matched by other partners, these investments grow, improve access to, or help maintain PP&R parks, facilities, and trails. Questions? Please call Jennifer Yocom at 503-823-5592. CAPITAL PROJECTS, ACQUISITIONS & PLANNING #1 APRIL HILL PARK BOARDWALK AND TRAIL Completed: Winter 2017 Investment: $635K ($498K SDCs; $83K Metro; $25K neighborhood #5 PORTLAND fundraising; $19K PP&R Land Stewardship; $10K BES) OPEN SPACE SEQUENCE Info: New boardwalks, bridges, trails; improves access, protects wetland. #2 DUNIWAY (TRACK & FIELD) #2 DUNIWAY PARK TRACK & FIELD DONATION #4 MARQUAM, #8 SOUTH Completed: Fall 2017 TERWILLIGER, WATERFRONT GEORGE HIMES Investment: Donation of full renovations provided by Under Armour (ACQUISITION & Info: Artificial turf improvement and track re-surfacing. RESTORATION) #3 MARSHALL PARK PLAYGROUND & ACQUISITION Completed: Summer 2015 | 2018 Investment: $977K (Play Area - $402K [$144K OPRD, $257K SDCs] + #11 RIEKE (FIELD) Acquisition - $575K [$450K SDCs, $125K Metro Local Share]) #6 Info: Playground, access to nature and seating improvements | two- #12 GABRIEL RED #9 WILLAMETTE
    [Show full text]
  • Portland Parks and Recreation
    Portland Parks and Recreation CBO has posted the online, interactive version of the bureau’s performance dashboard here: http://www.portlandoregon.gov/cbo/article/523266 The following questions were asked during the bureau’s budget work session. Responses are included in the attached packet. 1. Please provide a breakdown of scholarships by community center. 2. What facilities and parks would be closed if there were no increase in major maintenance funding? 3. Did the increase in the value of scholarships granted correspond to the number or participants in the program? Was there an increase in workload or did the cost of the programs go up? 4. List/plans of the following: Five-year major maintenance queue Five-year SDC funded projects Prior five-year SDC fund projects 5. Please provide descriptions and budget amounts for the two new requests: (1) parks rangers expansion and (2) tree code implementation PP&R Council Budget Questions – Follow up from March 17th Budget presentation: 1) Breakdown of scholarships by community center See Attached Scholarship PDF File 2) What facilities and parks would be closed if there were no increase in major maintenance funding? Rather than close whole facilities or parks when there is inadequate major maintenance funding we reduce levels of service (thin the soup) across the system and we also delay repairs and replacements, thus allowing the risk of failure to increase. Examples are the sewer back up at Sellwood, the sewer failure at Buckman Field House, the emergency culvert failures, etc. The one counter example that resulted a full closure and demolition was the wood play structure at Couch Park.
    [Show full text]
  • District Background
    DRAFT SOUTHEAST LIAISON DISTRICT PROFILE DRAFT Introduction In 2004 the Bureau of Planning launched the District Liaison Program which assigns a City Planner to each of Portland’s designated liaison districts. Each planner acts as the Bureau’s primary contact between community residents, nonprofit groups and other government agencies on planning and development matters within their assigned district. As part of this program, District Profiles were compiled to provide a survey of the existing conditions, issues and neighborhood/community plans within each of the liaison districts. The Profiles will form a base of information for communities to make informed decisions about future development. This report is also intended to serve as a tool for planners and decision-makers to monitor the implementation of existing plans and facilitate future planning. The Profiles will also contribute to the ongoing dialogue and exchange of information between the Bureau of Planning, the community, and other City Bureaus regarding district planning issues and priorities. PLEASE NOTE: The content of this document remains a work-in-progress of the Bureau of Planning’s District Liaison Program. Feedback is appreciated. Area Description Boundaries The Southeast District lies just east of downtown covering roughly 17,600 acres. The District is bordered by the Willamette River to the west, the Banfield Freeway (I-84) to the north, SE 82nd and I- 205 to the east, and Clackamas County to the south. Bureau of Planning - 08/03/05 Southeast District Page 1 Profile Demographic Data Population Southeast Portland experienced modest population growth (3.1%) compared to the City as a whole (8.7%).
    [Show full text]
  • Download PDF File Delta Park Economic Analysis Study
    The Impact of Portland’s Delta Park An Economic Analysis Before and After Proposed Facility Improvements May 2017 Prepared for: Portland Parks & Recreation KOIN Center 222 SW Columbia Street Suite 1600 Portland, OR 97201 503.222.6060 This page intentionally blank Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 INTRODUCTION 4 ECONOMIC IMPACT ANALYSIS 5 BASELINE ECONOMIC IMPACTS 7 PORTLAND INTERNATIONAL RACEWAY 7 Individual User Survey 7 Baseline Economic Impacts of PIR 16 DELTA PARK OWENS SPORTS COMPLEX 18 Individual User Survey 18 Baseline Economic Impacts of the Sports Complex 25 HERON LAKES GOLF CLUB 27 Individual User Survey 27 Baseline Economic Impacts of Heron Lakes 33 ECONOMIC IMPACTS IN THE FUTURE 36 LIST OF FUTURE IMPROVEMENTS 36 User Group Interviews 37 PORTLAND INTERNATIONAL RACEWAY 38 Key Takeaways from Interviews 38 Future Visitation 39 Future Operations 39 Economic Impacts 39 DELTA PARK OWENS SPORTS COMPLEX 41 Key Takeaways from Interviews 41 Future Visitation 41 Economic Impacts 43 HERON LAKES GOLF CLUB 44 Key Takeaways from Interviews 44 Future Visitation 44 Economic Impacts 46 HOTEL ANALYSIS 47 The Market 47 Historical Trends 50 New Hotel Concept 53 CONCLUSIONS 57 Recommendations 57 APPENDIX A. INDIVIDUAL SURVEY QUESTIONS 58 Visitor Survey Questions 58 APPENDIX B. ECONOMIC IMPACT TERMS AND DEFINITIONS 61 Gross Contributions vs. Net Impacts 62 Executive Summary The Portland Parks and Recreation asked ECONorthwest for an analysis of the current and future economic impacts of the three sports facilities located at Delta Park in north Portland—Portland International Raceway, Delta Park Owens Sports Complex, and the Heron Lakes Golf Club. The purpose of this report is to inform the agency’s facilities planning.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloads.Gigl.Org.Uk/Website/Parks People and Nature1.Pdf 8 Flores, T
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION OF Michelle Lee Talal for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Environmental Science presented on May 7, 2019 Title: Exploring Urban Parks: Plant Communities, Visitor Experiences, and Manager Perspectives in Portland, Oregon Abstract approved: ______________________________________________________ Mary V. Santelmann Urban parks are biodiversity hotspots within cities and have the potential to provide a range of socio-cultural benefits for people, but may not always meet the needs and desires of park visitors. A variety of land use practices and environmental factors affect urban park biodiversity and vegetation structure, composition, and ecological function, but more studies are needed to compare plant taxonomic composition, biodiversity patterns, and species traits across different types of urban green spaces. Additionally, there is a lack of research that explores park user experiences, vegetation perceptions, and accessibility issues in a range of urban park types interspersed throughout Portland using qualitative methods to observe and interview visitors on-site. More research is also needed that focuses on interviewing park managers about their perspectives on park benefits and management. The findings of my interdisciplinary dissertation may assist managers in their aims to achieve various ecological goals, as well as meet the needs and desires of park visitors within increasingly developed urban areas. The purpose of this research is three-fold, and includes examining: 1) The relationships between plant community composition, biodiversity patterns, environmental variables, and species traits in a range of urban parks in Portland, Oregon; 2) how the vegetation in these urban parks currently meets the needs and desires of visitors; and 3) how park managers currently manage vegetation in the parks to meet the needs and desires of visitors.
    [Show full text]
  • A Report on the 2003 Parks Levy Investment Objective 1: Restore
    A Report on the 2003 Parks Levy Investment In November 2002, Portland voters approved a five-year Parks Levy to begin in July 2003. Levy dollars restored budget cuts made in FY 2002-03 as well as major services and improvements outlined in the Parks 2020 Vision plan adopted by City Council in July 2001. In order to fulfill our obligation to the voters, we identified four key objectives. This report highlights what we have accomplished to date. Objective 1: Restore $2.2 million in cuts made in 2002/03 budget The 2003 Parks Levy restored cuts that were made to balance the FY 2002-03 General Fund budget. These cuts included the closure of some recreational facilities, the discontinuation and reduction of some community partnerships that provide recreational opportunities for youth, and reductions in maintenance of parks and facilities. Below is a detailed list of services restored through levy dollars. A. Restore programming at six community schools. SUN Community Schools support healthy social and cross-cultural development of all participants, teach and model values of respect and inclusion of all people, and help reduce social disparities and inequities. Currently, over 50% of students enrolled in the program are children of color. 2003/04 projects/services 2004/05 projects/services Proposed projects/services 2005/06 Hired and trained full-time Site Coordinators Total attendance at new sites (Summer Continue to develop programming to serve for 6 new PP&R SUN Community Schools: 2004-Spring 2005): 85,159 the needs of each school’s community and Arleta, Beaumont, Centennial, Clarendon, increase participation in these programs.
    [Show full text]
  • Budget Reductions & Urban Forestry Learning Landscapes Plantings
    View this email in your browser Share this URBAN FORESTRY January 2016 Get Involved! | Resources | Tree Permits | Tree Problems | Home In This Issue Budget Reductions & Urban Forestry Learning Landscapes Plantings, Urban Forestry in the Schoolyard Hiring Youth Conservation Crew (YCC) Summer Crew Leader, Apply by Thursday, March 3, 2016 Upcoming Urban Forestry Workshops, Free and Open to the Public Budget Reductions & Urban Forestry You may have recently heard about the upcoming 5% budget cuts proposed for Parks programs. Among the difficult reductions proposed, Urban Forestry could be effected by elimination of the $185,000 Dutch Elm Disease (DED) Treatment program. The City of Portland has minimized the spread of DED and avoided the decimation of the American elm (Ulmus americana) with a successful elm monitoring and treatment program. Without advanced warning, rapid detection and removal, the American elm could ultimately vanish from our landscape. Eastmoreland, Ladd’s Addition, the South Park blocks, Lents Park, Laurelhurst Park, and Overlook Park are areas where elms play a significant role in neighborhood identity. "Many communities have been able to maintain a healthy population of mature elms through a vigilant program of identification and removal of diseased elms and systematic pruning of weakened, dying or dead branches" -Linda Haugen, Plant Pathologist, USDA Forest Service Eliminating this program will also require adjacent property owners to cover the cost of removing DED- infected street trees themselves. The cut will also reduce citywide 24/7 emergency response to clear roads of trees which have fallen during storms, and reduce regular maintenance of publicly-owned trees- additional activities performed by some of the same staff .
    [Show full text]
  • PP&R's FY 2021-22 Requested Budget
    Requested Budget FY 2021-22 Portland Parks & Recreation PP&R Staff FY 2021-22 Requested Budget Maximo Behrens, Recreation Services Manager Tonya Booker, Land Stewardship Manager Carmen Rubio, Commissioner-in-charge Jenn Cairo, Urban Forestry Manager Tim Collier, Public Information Manager Adena Long, Director Margaret Evans, Workforce Development Manager Todd Lofgren, Deputy Director Vicente Harrison, Security and Emergency Manager Lauren McGuire, Assets and Development Manager Claudio Campuzano, Manager Kenya Williams, Equity and Inclusion Manager Finance, Property, & Technology Department Kerry Anderson Andre Ashley Don Athey Darryl Brooks Budget Advisory Committee Tamara Burkovskaia Krystin Castro Board Members Riley Clark-Long Paul Agrimis Mara Cogswell Mike Elliott Dale Cook Jenny Glass Terri Davis Juan Piantino Leah Espinoza Paddy Tillett Rachel Felice Bonnie Gee Yosick Joan Hallquist Erin Zollenkopf Erik Harrison Britta Herwig Labor Partners Brett Horner Sadie Atwell, Laborers Local 483 Don Joughin Luis Flores, PCL Brian Landoe Yoko Silk, PTE-17 Robin Laughlin Sara Mayhew-Jenkins Community Representatives Todd Melton Pauline Miranda Jeremy Robbins, Portland Accessibility Advisory Council Soo Pak Andre Middleton, Friends of Noise Dylan Paul Chris Rempel, Native American Community Advisory Council Nancy Roth JR Lilly, East Portland Action Plan Victor Sanders Joe McFerrin, Portland Opportunities Industrialization Center Jamie Sandness Brian Flores Garcia, Youth Durelle Singleton Sabrina Wilson, Rosewood Initiative Chris Silkie Jenny
    [Show full text]
  • BEECN Guidelines and Code of Conduct
    Basic Earthquake Emergency Communications Node (BEECN) Guidelines (first edition) Published: April 2019 Photo credits: Ernest Jones and Jeremy Van Keuren Graphics and layout: Jeremy Van Keuren Contents SECTION 000 - PROGRAM ORGANIZATION. .4 100.35 BEECN Cohort Coordinators ..................10 000.05 Section Numbers .............................4 100.40 BEECN Cohort Responsibilities ...............10 000.15 City Employees and BEECNs ...................5 100.45 Fire Station Cohorts. .11 000.20 Elements of a BEECN ..........................5 100.50 BEECN Volunteers and NETs ..................11 000.30 Location of BEECN Sites .......................6 100.55 Indemnification ..............................11 SECTION 100 - BEECN VOLUNTEERS ..............7 SECTION 200 - EQUIPMENT CACHES. .12 100.05 Role of BEECN Volunteers .....................7 200.05 Equipment Caches - General .................12 100.10 Persons with Disabilities ......................7 200.10 Equipment Caches - Placement ...............12 100.15 Volunteer Qualifications. 7 200.15 Supplementary Equipment in BEECN Caches .13 100.20 Relevant Volunteer Experience ................8 200.20 BEECN Cache Inventory ......................13 100.25 BEECN Training ...............................8 Troubleshooting the cache lid. 15 100.30 BEECN Volunteer Cohorts .....................9 BEECN radio frequencies ............................21 Page last updated: December 14, 2019 1:35 PM Page 1 of 58 SECTION 300 - OPERATIONS: BEECN SITES .......30 SECTION 400 - OPERATIONS: FIRE STATIONS. .38 300.05
    [Show full text]
  • About East Portland Neighborhoods Vol
    EAST PORTLAND NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION NEWS October 2009 News about East Portland Neighborhoods vol. 14 issue 4 Your NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS Argay pg.pg. pg. pg.5 pg.6 pg. Neighborhood Association 33 4 6 12 Centennial Community Association All about East Portland Glenfair Neighborhood Association Neighborhood Association News … Hazelwood The East Portland in outer East Portland that events, graffiti cleanups, and tribution with positive, far- Neighborhood Association Neighborhood Association make up the EPNO coalition tree plantings. reaching results. News (EPNAN) isn’t a news- (our alliance individual neigh- As you look through our The volunteers of the East Lents paper in the traditional sense. borhoods) – know more paper and see how your Portland Neighbors Inc. Neighborhood Association It wasn’t created to compete about this sanctioned system neighbors are making a real Newspaper Committee thank with community, city or of neighborhood organiza- difference in their neighbor- you for taking a few minutes Mill Park national news outlets – nei- tions, recognized by City gov- hood, perhaps you’ll be to discover more about what Neighborhood Association ther in content nor for adver- ernment. encouraged by their efforts. your neighbors are doing, tisers. So, the stories and photos Then, possibly you’ll decide and how you can help outer Parkrose Heights EPNAN is the way the East you see on the pages inside to take as little as one hour a East Portland be an even Association of Neighbors Portland Neighborhood are about volunteers and month to participate in your nicer place to live when we Organization (EPNO) reach- organizations that are work- neighborhood association work together.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Portland Public Schools Extended Day Care Program
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 082 855 95 PS 006.947 AUTHOR Sposito, Patricia J. TITLE Evaluation of Portland Public Schools Extended Day Care Program. Final Report. INSTITUTION Metropolitan Community Coordinated Child Care (4-C) Council, Portland, Oreg.; Multnomah County Intermediate Education District, Portland, Oreg. SPONS AGENCY National Center for Educational Research and' Development (DHEW/OE), Washington, D.C. Regional Research Program. BUREAU NO BR-2-J-014 PUB DATE Dec 72 CONTRACT OEC-X-72-0014(057) NOTE 149p. EDR-S PRICE MF-$0.65 HC-$6.58 DESCRIPTORS Cognitive Development; *Day.Care Programs; *Elementary School Students; *Evaluation; Instructional Staff; Objectives; Parent Participation; Personnel Evaluation; *Program Effectiveness; *Public Schools; Questionnaires; Summative Evaluation IDENTIFIERS *Extended Day Program; Oregon; Portland ABSTRACT The Extended Day Program (EDP) provides before and after school day care service to children in public school buildings. This summative evaluation judges the degree to which EDP has met its goals and served its clients, and provides recommendations for program improvement. The evaluator observed each center over a 6-month period; distributed a questionnaire to EDP staff and public school staff to discover their opinions of the program; interviewed parents, principals, and staff; evaluated an orientation workshop; and videotaped selected program activities. Phase I of the report, February-May 1972, concluded that EDP did not meet its major objectives. Much of the failure lay with inadequate program planning and administrative weaknesses. The program continued, but time limits were suggested within which positive changes should occur. In Phase II, the summer EDP program was evaluated and also found inadequate. Recommendations were made regarding facilities, analysis of programming, and use of existing community resources.
    [Show full text]