CITY of SEATTLE Center City Connector Streetcar

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

CITY of SEATTLE Center City Connector Streetcar CITY OF SEATTLE Improvement of: Center City Connector Streetcar, Advance Utility Package Phase 2 (FTA) FA#: ___ PW#: 2017-066 Funded by: Federal Transit Administration, Seattle Public Utilities Bids Open : December 13, 2017 Advertisement for Bids City of Seattle Center City Connector Streetcar, Advance Utility Package Phase 2 (FTA) Bid Opening Date: December 13, 2017 at 2:00 pm PW #: 2017-066 THIS PROJECT IS FEDERALLY FUNDED This Contract, as noted herein, is funded, in part, by the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Administration. This project is subject to the requirements set forth by the FTA Master Agreement. The remaining work is funded by local funding source and is not subject to the requirements set forth by FTA Master Agreement. PROJECT LOCATION: Downtown Seattle on 1st Avenue from Stewart Street to Madison Street, and Stewart Street from Westlake Avenue to 1st Avenue. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The project consists of utility improvements including water, sewer, drainage, and electrical power distribution. Water improvements include the removal of existing cast iron water main and appurtenances and replacement with a new ductile iron water main, including valves, hydrants and water services. This work is identified under bid schedule SPU Water. Sewer improvements consist of maintenance hole riser reconstruction, sewer lateral spot repairs, and cured-in-place-pipe (CIPP) lining in the sewer mainline on 1st Avenue from Seneca Street to Spring Street. This work has been identified under bid schedule SPU Sewer. SDOT Improvements include drainage improvements such as replacement of inlets, pipe, and catch basins at intersections and mid-block throughout the project corridor. Work also includes construction of a new duct bank to serve the traction power system for the future Center City Connector Streetcar. This work has been identified under bid schedule SDOT. Electrical power distribution improvements include reconstruction of existing ductbank on 1st Avenue between Stewart Street and Union Street; on Stewart Street from 3rd Avenue to 4th Avenue; on Stewart Street from Westlake Avenue to 5th Avenue and then along 5th Avenue to Olive Way; and on Republican Street at Westlake Avenue. This work has been identified under bid schedule SCL Improvements. Improvements to the corridor will include roadway pavement, curb, and sidewalk restoration, along with miscellaneous work for associated pavement and sidewalk removal, temporary and permanent pavement restoration and other associated surface improvements including landscape restoration. This work has been distributed among bid schedules SPU Water, Sewer, Drainage, and SCL Improvements, depending on the type of work that required surface improvement. A/E ESTIMATE: $26,900,000 DBE Goal: 8.3% For questions please contact: Miguel Beltran – (206) 684-4525 [email protected] Carmen Kucinski – (206) 684-0188 [email protected] PRE-BID SITE INSPECTION/MEETING: Bidders may attend one of the following optional pre-bid meeting followed by optional site inspection, which will be held on the following dates: 1. Monday, November 27th, 2017 at 10:30 a.m. at Seattle Municipal Tower Room 3832, 700 Fifth Avenue, Seattle 2. Tuesday, November 28th, 2017, at 1:00 p.m. at Seattle Municipal Tower Room 3832, 700 Fifth Avenue, Seattle Bids will be accepted from any bidder who does not attendthe optional pre-bid meetings. PAID SICK AND SAFE TIME: Bidders must understand the requirements of SMC 14.16 [www2.municode.com] and demonstrate compliance prior to award. QUESTIONS: Written questions must be submitted no later than close of business on Friday, December 4th, 2017. BID DOCUMENTS: Contract Documents, contacts and Bid Instructions are available at https://www.ebidexchange.com/seattle. Center City Connector Streetcar, Advance Utility Package Phase 2 (FTA) Table of Contents ___ TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. Volume 1 Advertisement for Bids Signature Page Table of Contents Bid Requirements ....................................................................................................................................... 1 0-01.1 Instructions to Bidders ............................................................................................................... 1 0-01.2 Checklist for Bidders .................................................................................................................. 1 0-01.3 Bid Form .................................................................................................................................... 2 0-01.4 DBE Utilization - Certification .................................................................................................. 37 0-01.5 Buy America Certification ........................................................................................................ 41 0-01.6 Bidder / Subcontractor List ...................................................................................................... 42 Contract Requirements ............................................................................................................................ 43 0-02.1 Agreement (Contract) Form ..................................................................................................... 43 0-02.3 Plans, Drawings and Specifications ........................................................................................ 46 0-02.4 Location of Project ................................................................................................................... 47 0-02.5 Nature of Improvement ............................................................................................................ 47 Division 1: General Requirements .......................................................................................................... 49 1-01 Definitions and Terms .................................................................................................................... 49 1-01.1 General (GSP 03-09-16) ........................................................................................................ 49 1-01.2 Abbreviations ............................................................................................................................ 49 1-01.3 Definitions (SP 8-23-11) ......................................................................................................... 49 1-02 Bid Procedures and Conditions...................................................................................................... 51 1-02.2 Supplemental Bidder Responsibility Criteria - Project Specific (SP 10-13-17) (FTA C 4220.1F, Ch. IV, 2.a(4)(a) and Ch. IV, 8.b) ......................................................................................... 51 1-02.4 Examination of Bid Documents and Project Site ..................................................................... 56 1-02.9 Bid Submittal (FTA C 4220.1F, Ch. VI, 3.c(2)(e)).................................................................... 56 1-02.13 Irregular Bids (GSP 05-01-13) ............................................................................................... 56 1-03 Award and Execution of Contract .................................................................................................. 56 1-03.1 Consideration of Bids .............................................................................................................. 56 1-03.6 Protests (SP 06-15-17) ............................................................................................................ 57 1-04 Scope of Work ................................................................................................................................ 57 1-04.2 Coordination of Contract Documents (GSP 04-08-10) ............................................................ 57 1-04.4 Changes (SP 05-05-17) ........................................................................................................... 58 1-05 Control of Work .............................................................................................................................. 59 1-05.2 Authority Of Assistants and Electrical Safety Observer (SP 05-05-17)................................... 59 Version: 11/23/2016 -FTA Center City Connector Streetcar, Advance Utility Package Phase 2 (FTA) Table of Contents ___ 1-05.3 Submittals ................................................................................................................................ 59 1-05.4 Conformity with and Deviations from Drawings and Stakes (GSP 05-21-11) ......................... 63 1-05.5 Construction Stakes ................................................................................................................ 64 1-05.13 Superintendents, Labor and Equipment ................................................................................ 68 1-05.14 Cooperation with Other Contractors (SP 10-13-17) .............................................................. 69 1-06 Control of Materials ........................................................................................................................ 81 1-06.1 Approval of Materials Prior to Use (SP 10-13-17) ................................................................... 81 1-06.2 Samples and Tests for Acceptance of Materials (GSP 8-15-14) ............................................ 81 1-07 Legal Relations and Responsibilities to the Public ........................................................................ 81 1-07.1
Recommended publications
  • UNECE Tram and Metro Statistics Metadata Introduction File Structure
    UNECE Tram and Metro Statistics Metadata Introduction This file gives detailed country notes on the UNECE tram and metro statistics dataset. These metadata describe how countries have compiled tram and metro statistics, what the data cover, and where possible how passenger numbers and passenger-km have been determined. Whether data are based on ticket sales, on-board sensors or another method may well affect the comparability of passenger numbers across systems and countries, hence it being documented here. Most of the data are at the system level, allowing comparisons across cities and systems. However, not every country could provide this, sometimes due to confidentiality reasons. In these cases, sometimes either a regional figure (e.g. the Provinces of Canada, which mix tram and metro figures with bus and ferry numbers) or a national figure (e.g. Czechia trams, which excludes the Prague tram system) have been given to maximise the utility of the dataset. File Structure The disseminated file is structured into seven different columns, as follows: Countrycode: These are United Nations standard country codes for statistical use, based on M49. The codes together with the country names, region and other information are given here https://unstats.un.org/unsd/methodology/m49/overview/ (and can be downloaded as a CSV directly here https://unstats.un.org/unsd/methodology/m49/overview/#). City: This column gives the name of the city or region where the metro or tram system operates. In many cases, this is sufficient to identify the system. In some cases, non-roman character names have been converted to roman characters for convenience.
    [Show full text]
  • Streetcar Plan Posters
    WELCOME Welcome! The purpose of this open house is to present draft recommendations from the Bicycle Master Plan and the Streetcar System Plan to the public. City sta! and citizen volunteers are here to present the material and to answer questions. The room is divided into three sections: one for the Bicycle Master Plan, one for the Streetcar System Plan, and one called “Integration Station,” where we tie the two concepts together. Refreshments and child care services are also available. The bicycle and streetcar networks will play a key role in Portland’s future. Together, they will reduce reliance on the automobile for daily tasks, they will reinforce urban land use patterns, and they will help the City achieve its goals to combat climate change. This is the beginning of a transportation transformation. WHY PLAN? PORTLAND HAS A HISTORY OF SUCCESSFUL LONG-RANGE PLANNING In 1904, landscape architect John C. Olmsted produced a report for the City Among the parks that resulted from the Olmsted Plan are Holladay Park, Irving Parks Board. The plan served as a blueprint for development of the highly Park, Mt. Tabor (shown above), Overlook Park, Rocky Butte, Sellwood Park, valued park system we enjoy today. Washington Park, and several others. Interstate MAX Opened 2004 Airport MAX Hillsboro MAX Opened 2001 Opened 1998 Portland Streetcar Opened 2001 MAX to Gresham Opened 1986 Clackamas MAX Opens fall 2009 Westside Express Service Opened Feb. 2009 In 1989, three years after the "rst MAX line opened from downtown to Gresham, 20 years later the regional rail system is well on its way to being constructed as planners laid out a vision for a regional rail system.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Meeting Presentation 130826.Pptx
    Proposed Long-Term Streetcar Network Study Overview/Purpose § Examine the feasibility of streetcar service in Saint Paul § Determine where it would work best § Determine where to start 2 What is Streetcar Service? Consists of many elements: Vehicles Stops Right-of-Way Short Stop Spacing Fare Payment New Development Streetcar Vehicles • Modern, vintage, or replica of vintage streetcar • Usually single vehicle Modern Streetcar, Toronto Modern Streetcar, Portland Modern Streetcar, Seattle Modern Streetcar, Tacoma Vintage Streetcar, Memphis Historic Replica Streetcar, New Orleans Streetcars in the Street • Usually operate in mixed-traffic • But can also operate in exclusive rights-of-way Portland Streetcar Seattle Streetcar Tucson Streetcar (Planned) San Francisco F-Line Portland Streetcar Kansas City Streetcar (Planned) Streetcar Route Length & Stop Spacing • Short lengths; focus on shorter more local trips • Frequent stops; approximately every two blocks 2.8 miles 2.1miles Portland Streetcar Kansas City Streetcar (Planned) Streetcar Stops Smaller scale/less elaborate than LRT stations Portland Streetcar Stop Seattle Streetcar Stop Toronto Streetcar Stop Future Westgate Light Rail Station, St. Paul Economic Development Patterns Streetcar Light Rail • Linear economic development • Nodal economic development South Lake Union Streetcar, Seattle The Lyric near the future Raymond Ave Station, St. Paul Construction Impacts Streetcar Light Rail • Lower impact • Greater impact • Faster construction • Longer construction First Hill Streetcar construction,
    [Show full text]
  • The Path to Partnership: How Cities and Transit Systems Can Stop
    The Path to Partnership: How Cities and Transit Systems Can Stop Worrying and Join Forces Introduction In order to keep and attract riders, transit must be frequent, fast, and reliable. Maintaining frequent, fast, and reliable service in the congested conditions of most American cities requires prioritizing street level transit above automobile traffic, through measures like bus lanes, queue jumps, and signal priority. Relative to large capital projects, bus priority measures provide immediate improvements in travel time and reliability at a small fraction of the cost, and can be accomplished overnight with the right combination of paint, light duty street installations, and enforcement. The projects profiled in this study, including a bus lane in Everett, MA, New York City’s Select Bus Service, and Seattle’s Rapid Ride have seen travel time savings of 10-30%. While on-street transit improvements can be done quickly and cheaply, they aren’t necessarily easy to accomplish. Getting them done usually requires two things: · Political will and leadership from mayors, transit system managers and board members, and other leaders who must be willing to defend potentially controversial street and service changes like removing on-street parking spaces for a bus lane, or eliminating bus stops that are too close together. · Structuring transit agencies and city street agencies to more quickly and effectively deliver on-street transit projects. This may mean forging new relationships and decision-making processes, gathering new data, hiring for different skills, and figuring out new ways to prioritize projects. 2 Transit street projects can be tough to get done when there’s no history of doing them.
    [Show full text]
  • Seattle Streetcar First Hill Line
    SEATTLE STREETCAR FIRST HILL LINE Operations & Maintenance Plan v 03 February 2012 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY..........................................................................................................2 1. PURPOSE AND SCOPE.......................................................................................................3 2. SYSTEM DESCRIPTION......................................................................................................4 3. SERVICE PLAN..................................................................................................................9 4. OPERATIONS.................................................................................................................13 5. MAINTENANCE..............................................................................................................15 6. STAFFING & BUDGET....................................................................................................23 7. SAFETY .........................................................................................................................25 8. COMMUNICATIONS & MARKETING………………………………………………………………………….….26 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The First Hill Streetcar links First Hill employment centers to the regional transit system via connections on Capitol Hill and in the International District. The First Hill Streetcar also connects diverse and vibrant neighborhoods on Capitol Hill, First Hill, the Central Area, the Chinatown/International District, and Pioneer Square while serving medical
    [Show full text]
  • SEATTLE STREETCAR Operations Report
    Seattle Department of Transportation SEATTLE STREETCAR Operations Report July 2019 CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................4 1.1. South Lake Union Streetcar.....................................................................4 1.2. First Hill Streetcar ...................................................................................6 1.3. Center City Connector .............................................................................6 2. OPERATIONS HIGHLIGHTS ..................................................................................7 2.1. Governance Structure and Budget Overview ..........................................7 2.2. Status of Negotiations on New Streetcar ILA..........................................8 2.3. Safety & Security Update .........................................................................9 3. FINANCIAL METRICS .........................................................................................10 3.1. South Lake Union Streetcar...................................................................10 3.2. First Hill Streetcar .................................................................................13 3.3. Investment in Streetcar Operations ......................................................15 4. PERFORMANCE METRICS ..................................................................................17 4.1. Ridership ................................................................................................17
    [Show full text]
  • Rail Fixed Guideway Public Transportation System Safety Report
    2020 RAIL FIXED GUIDEWAY PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM SAFETY REPORT JULY 2021 2020 Rail Fixed Guideway Public Transportation System Safety Report WSDOT STATE SAFETY OVERSIGHT PROGRAM 2020 RAIL FIXED GUIDEWAY PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM SAFETY REPORT CONTENTS Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................1 Rail fixed guideway public transportation systems in Washington .......................................................3 Sound Transit ..................................................................................................................................................3 City of Seattle .................................................................................................................................................5 2020 State Safety Oversight Program updates .........................................................................................7 Accidents, incidents, and corrective action plans ......................................................................................7 Acronyms and abbreviations .......................................................................................................................11 Websites featured ...........................................................................................................................................12 2020 RAIL FIXED GUIDEWAY PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM SAFETY REPORT WSDOT’s State Safety INTRODUCTION Oversight
    [Show full text]
  • As a Di‘Erent Route Through Downtown Buses Continuing INTERBAY Swedish S
    N 152 St to Shoreline CC Snohomish County– to Aurora toAuroraVill toMtlk to Richmond NE 150 St toWoodinvilleviaBothell 373 5 SHORELINE 355 Village Beach Downtown Seattle toNSt Terr to Shoreline CC toUWBothell 308 512 402 405 410 412 347 348 77 330 309 toHorizonView 312 413 415 416 417 421 NE 145 St 373 308 NE 145 St ­toKenmoreP&R N 145 St 304 316 Transit in Seattle 422 425 435 510 511 65 308 toUWBothell 513 Roosevelt Wy N Frequencies shown are for daytime period. See Service Guide N 143 St 28 Snohomish County– 346 512 301 303 73 522 for a complete summary of frequencies and days of operation. 5 64 University District 5 E 304 308 For service between 1:30–4:30 am see Night Owl map. 512 810 821 855 860 E N 871 880 y 3 Av NW 3 Av Jackson Park CEDAR W Frequent Service N 135 St Golf Course OLYMPIC y Linden Av N Linden Av PARK t Bitter i Every 15 minutes or better, until 7 pm, Monday to Friday. C HILLS weekdays Lake e 372 Most lines oer frequent service later into the night and on NW 132 St Ingraham k a Ashworth Av N Av Ashworth N Meridian Av NE 1 Av NE 15 Av NE 30 Av L weekends. Service is less frequent during other times. (express) 373 77 N 130 St Roosevelt Wy NE 372 weekends 28 345 41 Link Light Rail rapid transit North- every 10 minutes BITTER LAKE acres 8 Av NW 8 Av Park 5 NW 125 St N 125 St Haller NE 125 St E RapidRide limited stop bus for a faster ride 345 Lake NE 125 St every 10–12 minutes 346 PINEHURST 8 Frequent Bus every 10–12 minutes BROADVIEW 99 347 348 continues as LAKE CITY 75 Frequent Bus every 15 minutes 41 345 NE 120 St Northwest
    [Show full text]
  • Examining the Development Effects of Modern-Era Streetcars: an Assessment of Portland and Seattle
    Project 1798 October 2018 Examining the Development Effects of Modern-Era Streetcars: An Assessment of Portland and Seattle Jeffrey Brown, PhD Joel Mendez, PhD MINETA TRANSPORTATION INSTITUTE transweb.sjsu.edu MINETA TRANSPORTATION INSTITUTE MTI FOUNDER LEAD UNIVERSITY OF Hon. Norman Y. Mineta Mineta Consortium for Transportation Mobility MTI BOARD OF TRUSTEES Founded in 1991, the Mineta Transportation Institute (MTI), an organized research and training unit in partnership with the Founder, Honorable Norman Richard Anderson (Ex-Officio) Steve Heminger* (TE 2018) Dan Smith (TE 2020) Lucas College and Graduate School of Business at San José State University (SJSU), increases mobility for all by improving the safety, Mineta (Ex-Officio) President and CEO Executive Director President Secretary (ret.), US Department of Amtrak Metropolitan Transportation Capstone Financial Group, Inc. efficiency, accessibility, and convenience of our nation’s transportation system. Through research, education, workforce development, Transportation Commission (MTC) and technology transfer, we help create a connected world. MTI leads the four-university Mineta Consortium for Transportation Vice Chair Laurie Berman (Ex-Officio) Paul Skoutelas (Ex-Officio) Hill & Knowlton, Inc. Director Diane Woodend Jones (TE 2019) President & CEO Mobility, a Tier 1 University Transportation Center funded by the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Office of the Assistant California Department Principal & Chair of Board American Public Transportation Secretary for Research and
    [Show full text]
  • Bombardier Test Project Involves Induction Technology Page 1 of 3
    Bombardier test project involves induction technology Page 1 of 3 Bombardier test project involves induction technology BY FRANÇOIS SHALOM, THE GAZETTE JANUARY 10, 2013 An artist’s conception of Bombardier’s new electric bus which has its battery recharged through a capacitor under bus stops. MONTREAL — There’s no budget, no timeline, no proven technology, much less shovels in the ground or even a signed contract. But it’s substantially more than an idle dream. Montreal’s Île-Ste-Hélène is scheduled to be the North American test site this year for Bombardier Inc.’s Primove pilot project, a technology that is being tested at four sites in Germany, where the firm’s rail division is based. Primove’s mandate is to develop electric mass-transit propulsion systems, but not the vehicles themselves. Intended to bypass the conventional notion of electric buses and trolley buses powered by cumbersome batteries, Primove rests on an inductive transfer of power from ground-based electrical power sources to very small batteries placed under, not in, the bus. Sensors on the vehicles would store the energy emitted by the electro-magnetic field, but only in small quantities, feeding the bus or trolley sufficiently to reach the next power source a short distance away. The system can charge while the vehicle is in motion or at rest. http://www.montrealgazette.com/story_print.html?id=7803624&sponsor= 2/28/2013 Bombardier test project involves induction technology Page 2 of 3 “You bury power stations capable of charging rapidly, even instantly — we’re talking seconds — so that you don’t need to resort to (lengthier) conventional power boost systems currently on the market” like hybrid and electric vehicles, said Bombardier Transportation spokesperson Marc Laforge.
    [Show full text]
  • Seattle Streetcar Center City Connector Seattle, Washington Small Starts Project Development (Rating Assigned November 2016)
    Seattle Streetcar Center City Connector Seattle, Washington Small Starts Project Development (Rating Assigned November 2016) Summary Description Proposed Project: Streetcar 1.3 Miles, 4 Stations Total Capital Cost ($YOE): $166.55 Million Section 5309 Small Starts Share ($YOE): $74.99 Million (45.0%) Annual Operating Cost (opening year 2020): $5.68 Million 11,000 Daily Linked Trips Current Year Ridership Forecast (2014): 3,457,200 Annual Linked Trips 20,100 Daily Linked Trips Horizon Year Ridership Forecast (2035): 6,343,600 Annual Linked Trips Overall Project Rating: High Project Justification Rating: Medium-High Local Financial Commitment Rating: High Project Description: The City of Seattle proposes to connect the existing South Lake Union Streetcar Line with the First Hill Streetcar Line, which began operations in January 2016. The project includes transit signal priority, expansion of the existing maintenance facility, modifications to two existing stations, and the purchase of 10 vehicles. The service is planned to operate 21 hours a day on weekdays and 17 to 19 hours a day on weekends and holidays, with service every five minutes during peak periods and every five to 7.5 minutes during weekday off-peak periods and weekends. Project Purpose: The project will serve the growing demand for Center City circulation trips and is expected to improve transit service quality and reliability downtown because it will operate in exclusive transit lanes. The streetcar will support local circulation for people arriving in the Center City on 56 bus routes, three bus rapid transit lines, regional light rail, two commuter rail lines, and a number of passenger ferries.
    [Show full text]
  • Amended and Restated Interlocal Agreement
    17876 Attachment A, July 29, 2014 AMENDED AND RESTATED INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT between King County and the City of Seattle Regarding The Seattle Streetcar System This Amended and Restated Interlocal Agreement ("Agreement") is entered into this I m day of 0&.\v\u, 20 14 (the "Effective Date"), by and between the City of Seattle ("the City"), a municipal corporation and first-class home rule city with a council-mayor form of government, and King County ("the County"), a home rule charter county and political subdivision of the State of Washington. The City and the County are sometimes referred to individually as a "Party" and collectively as the "Parties." RECITALS Whereas, pursuant to Chapters 36.56 RCW and 35.58 RCW and public vote, the County is authorized to perform metropolitan public transportation functions; and Whereas, under that certain inter local agreement dated August 20, 2007, and authorized by King County Ordinance 15860 the County operates and maintains the City's streetcars for the South Lake Union streetcar line; and Whereas, King County also operates and maintains Sound Transit's light rail system by agreement with Sound Transit; and Whereas, the City is constructing the First Hill streetcar line, and is acquiring streetcar vehicles for it, and the Parties anticipate that in the future the City may construct additional streetcar Jines and purchase additional streetcar vehicles; and Whereas, the Parties believe it is in the best interest of the public for the County to continue to operate and maintain the City's streetcar
    [Show full text]