DOCSLIB.ORG

Manchester Metrolink – Operator Maintainer • the Challenges • Next Steps Metrolink

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Manchester Metrolink – Operator Maintainer • the Challenges • Next Steps Metrolink Keolis Amey Metrolink Jen McKinney Summary • Manchester Metrolink – Operator Maintainer • The Challenges • Next Steps Metrolink • Keolis Amey Joint Venture - KAM • Keolis international passenger transport business • Amey leading supplier of consulting and infrastructure support services UK and internationally • Involved in 3 JV’s – Metrolink, London Docklands Light Railway, and Wales and Borders • Manchester Metrolink owned by Transport for Greater Manchester (TfGM) • 2017 appointed KAM as Operator and Maintainer of Metrolink - 10 years • The UK’s largest tramway Manchester Metrolink • 7 routes • +800 staff • 93 stops • 2 depots • 120 trams • Trafford Park line (2020) adds 6 more stops (from Pomona to • +37 million passengers a year intu Trafford Park) Metrolink • Opened in 1992 31 km and subsequently expanded • Bombardier M5000 high floor tram, operating as singles or doubles • 750v dc • Two depots - Queens Rd and Trafford • 95km track – mostly double track • Utilises combination of ex heavy rail corridor and on street routes • Ballasted track and street running embedded track • Vignole and grooved rail • OLE – mix of twin and single contact wire The Challenges - Track • Ride Quality – temporary speed restrictions • Rail breaks - Suspended Gauge Corner Restoration Welding OLE – Corporation St – Ferrule Event: Failure of copper ferrule on span wire. This secures the steel wire in a loop at its end to attach to other components. Cause: Lab testing confirmed incorrect grade of copper used for ferrule at installation. Ferrule Impact: 1CC closed for whole day Action: All ferrules inspected, but fatigue is hidden on the inside. Clamps as “belt and braces” trialled. Renewal proposal for further clamps to be Clamp installed. OLE – Weaste – Parafil Rope Event: Failure of parafil rope - insulated supporting rope. Cause: Known issue of hidden degradation of parafil ropes. Impact: Afternoon suspension during Parklife weekend Action: Temporary repair made until Eccles Blockade. Replace parafil span with steel wire during blockade. Internal fibres severed Degraded fibres are hidden within sheathing so can’t be inspected. OLE – Langworthy – Parafil Rope Event: Failure of parafil rope Cause: Known issue of hidden degradation of parafil ropes. Impact: 6hr suspension. Multicar failed, adding to length of repair. Action: Degraded fibres are hidden within sheathing so can’t be inspected. Renewal proposals in development: -Replace parafil ropes with steel wire design. -Replace Eccles Line OLE with auto- tensioning design to eliminate sag. Next Steps – Maintenance and Renewals • Renewals proposals to TfGM for steel wire and auto-tensioned OLE system on Eccles Line. • Critical spares plan to ensure we have the right tools and equipment, in the right place to minimise repair times. • Working with Service Delivery to get service back as quickly and safely as possible. • Seeking modern replacement for the Multicar Next Steps – Asset Management Context: Our businesses place safety and customer satisfaction at their core with our philosophies of: ‘zero harm’, ‘think like a customer’ and ‘brilliant basics’, analytics led continuous improvement. (Delivery Plan 4 – Asset Management and Maintenance, Exec Summary, p.1) ‘’ How ‘Brilliant Basics’ applies to the Asset Management lifecycle 11 Specify What How (ERP) Statutory Regulations & Implement central Requirements engineering and asset management team Standards and Specs Carry our Asset Criticality OEM Data workshops and leverage knowledge and experience Asset Management Strategy and Plans Implement Enterprise Risk Management Framework Technical Maintenance Plans Asset Criticality Risk Management 12 Execute What How (ERP) Annual Works Plans Implement right delivery team Planning & Scheduling structure and capability Spares & Logistics Core Value Chain – Asset Maintenance reference groups, Procedure process mapping, technical writing Process Work Instructions Rights Skills and competencies to Maintenance Task deliver Instructions Supply Chain Training documentation Improvement program 13 Record What How (ERP) Acquiring and Agility Upgrade – recording data in real configured to capture the time, during the right data, at a high level course of of quality and usability maintenance: • Measurements CMMS single source of • Faults – Problem, truth Cause, Remedy • Condition – define Track, Tram and OLE index inpection equipment, HD • Parts used Cameras Remote condition Training of staff to use monitoring, Agility inspections and surveying 14 Analyse What How (ERP) Using high quality Engineering and Asset data acquired Mgt skills and capability during the course of maintenance to Reliability centred inform decision maintenance making that FMEA improves business FMECA performance. Risk Based Maintenace Asset reliability Engineering Change Technical Management Maintenance Plan optimisation Data analytics tools: • Mercury monitoring Reduced Maint software Costs • CoBalt Whole Life Cost Modelling tool 15 KAM Asset overview Insert some KAM asset info – fun facts! 16 Next Steps – Condition Monitoring • Automated wheel measurement • Tyres • Pads • Discs • Automation of track measurement • Geometry • Rail wear • Ultrasonic rail measurement • Digital image capture of rails • Contact wire height and stagger • Contact wire thickness • Ride • Pantograph monitoring Condition Monitoring Project • Equip one tram with the infrastructure measurement equipment • Track, and; • OLE • Install wheel measurement equipment at Trafford Depot • Install pantograph monitoring system on the Metrolink system • Ultrasonic rail testing equipment • Procure a mechanism to measure vehicle ride quality • Use tried and tested equipment - not looking for an experiment Questions?.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Manchester Metrolink Tram System
    Feature New Promise of LRT Systems Manchester Metrolink Tram System William Tyson Introduction to Greater city that could be used by local rail into the city centre either in tunnel or on Manchester services—taking them into the central the street. area—to complete closure and I carried out an appraisal of these options The City of Manchester (pop. 500,000) is replacement of the services by buses. Two and showed that closure of the lines had at the heart of the Greater Manchester options were to convert some heavy rail a negative benefit-to-cost ratio, and that— conurbation comprised of 10 lines to light rail (tram) and extend them at the very least—they should be kept municipalities that is home to 2.5 million people. The municipalities appoint a Passenger Transport Authority (PTA) for the Figure 1 Metrolink Future Network whole area to set policies and the Greater 1 Victoria Manchester Passenger Transport Executive 2 Shudehill 3 Market Street Rochdale Town Centre 4 Mosley Street (GMPTE) to implement them. Buses Newbold Manchester 5 Piccadilly Gardens Drake Street Piccadilly Kingsway Business Park 6 Rochdale provide most public transport. They are 7 St Peter's Square Railway Milnrow Station deregulated and can compete with each 8 G-Max (for Castlefield) Newhey London 9 Cornbrook other and with other modes. There is a 0 Pomona Bury - Exchange Quay local rail network serving Manchester, and = Salford Quays Buckley Wells ~ Anchorage ! Harbour City linking it with the surrounding areas and @ Broadway Shaw and Crompton # Langworthy also other regions of the country. Street $ Tradfford Bar trams vanished from Greater Manchester % Old Trafford Radcliffe ^ Wharfside* & Manchester United* in 1951, but returned in a very different * Imperial War Museum for the North* ( Lowry Centre form in 1992.
    [Show full text]
  • Keolis-Amey Metrolink PPM for Period 2018/01
    Metrolink Performance Network Summary KeolisAmey Metrolink aim to deliver a reliable service to our customers. We want to share with you how we are performing. This report covers our four-week period between: 03 February until 02 March 2019 How we performed Punctuality Reliability Percentage of trams departing less than two minutes late. Percentage of planned miles operated. 91.7% 99.4% 100100 100100 9595 9595 9090 9090 55 55 00 00 . 5 5 5 Period Period Period 9 Period 10 Period 11 Period 12 5 Period Period Period 9 Period 10 Period 11 Period 12 (18/19) (18/19) Route punctuality by date Airport 88.4% irport 991 Altrincham 9 ltrincham 99 Ahton 93 shton 99 ury 909 ury 99 Eat idbury 932 East idsbury 99 Eccle 87% Eccles 99 ldham Rochdale 91 Oldham Rochdale 991 75% 0 85% 90 9 100 75 0 85 90 9 100 55 00 55 9090 9595 100100 Cancellations Short journeys Journeys cancelled. Incomplete journeys. 0.28% of all planned journeys. 0.46% of all planned journeys. Aline Frantzen What we are doing to improve Managing Director at KeolisAmey Metrolink Issued on Friday 22 March 2019 Metrolink is operated on behalf of Transport for Greater Manchester by Metrolink Performance Airport Line KeolisAmey Metrolink aim to deliver a reliable service to our customers. We want to share with you how we are performing. This report covers our four-week period between: 03 February until 02 March 2019 How we performed Punctuality Reliability Percentage of trams departing less than two minutes late. Percentage of planned miles operated.
    [Show full text]
  • Rail Accident Report
    Rail Accident Report Derailment of a tram at Pomona, Manchester 17 January 2007 Report 09/2008 April 2008 This investigation was carried out in accordance with: l the Railway Safety Directive 2004/49/EC; l the Railways and Transport Safety Act 2003; and l the Railways (Accident Investigation and Reporting) Regulations 2005. © Crown copyright 2008 You may re-use this document/publication (not including departmental or agency logos) free of charge in any format or medium. You must re-use it accurately and not in a misleading context. The material must be acknowledged as Crown copyright and you must give the title of the source publication. Where we have identified any third party copyright material you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. This document/publication is also available at www.raib.gov.uk. Any enquiries about this publication should be sent to: RAIB Email: [email protected] The Wharf Telephone: 01332 253300 Stores Road Fax: 01332 253301 Derby UK Website: www.raib.gov.uk DE21 4BA This report is published by the Rail Accident Investigation Branch, Department for Transport. Derailment of a tram at Pomona, Manchester 17 January 2007 Contents Introduction 4 Summary of the report 5 Key facts about the accident 5 Identification of immediate cause, causal and contributory factors and underlying causes 6 Recommendations 6 The Accident 7 Summary of the accident 7 The parties involved 8 Location 9 The tram 9 Events during the accident 9 Events following the accident 10 The Investigation 11 Sources of
    [Show full text]
  • Tfgm Blank Document Template
    Monitoring and Evaluation Second Report March 2021 1 Table of Contents 1 Executive Summary .................................................................................................... 4 1.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................... 4 1.2 Findings in relation to transport objectives ...................................................... 4 1.3 Findings in relation to economic and social objectives ..................................... 6 1.4 Next steps .......................................................................................................... 7 2 Introduction ................................................................................................................ 8 2.1 Purpose of this report ........................................................................................ 8 2.2 Research questions ............................................................................................ 8 2.3 Structure of this report .................................................................................... 10 3 Achievement of transport-related objectives .......................................................... 11 3.1 Make-up of usage of Phase 3 lines .................................................................. 11 3.2 Attractiveness to car available travellers and modal shift evidence............... 12 3.3 Implications of mode shift evidence ............................................................... 13 3.4 Explanatory factors
    [Show full text]
  • The Covid-19 Funding Gap: the Case for Continuing Support for Urban Public Transport
    Report September 2020 The Covid-19 Funding Gap: The Case for Continuing Support for Urban Public Transport Urban Transport Group Our ref: 23930401 Report September 2020 The Covid-19 Funding Gap: The Case for Continuing Support for Urban Public Transport Prepared by: Prepared for: Steer Urban Transport Group 67 Albion Street Wellington House Leeds LS1 5AA 40-50 Wellington Street Leeds LS1 2DE +44 113 389 6400 www.steergroup.com Our ref: 23930401 Steer has prepared this material for Urban Transport Group. This material may only be used within the context and scope for which Steer has prepared it and may not be relied upon in part or whole by any third party or be used for any other purpose. Any person choosing to use any part of this material without the express and written permission of Steer shall be deemed to confirm their agreement to indemnify Steer for all loss or damage resulting therefrom. Steer has prepared this material using professional practices and procedures using information available to it at the time and as such any new information could alter the validity of the results and conclusions made. The Covid-19 Funding Gap: The Case for Continuing Support for Urban Public Transport | Report Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................................. i Overview .............................................................................................................................. i Public Transport Pre-Covid .................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Making the Right Choices: Options for Managing Transport Congestion
    Making the right choices: Options for managing transport congestion A draft report for further consultation and input April 2006 © State of Victoria 2006 This draft report is copyright. No part may be reproduced by any process except in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968 (Cwlth), without prior written permission from the Victorian Competition and Efficiency Commission. Cover images reproduced with the permission of the Department of Treasury and Finance, Victoria and VicRoads. ISBN 1-920-92173-7 Disclaimer The views expressed herein are those of the Victorian Competition and Efficiency Commission and do not purport to represent the position of the Victorian Government. The content of this draft report is provided for information purposes only. Neither the Victorian Competition and Efficiency Commission nor the Victorian Government accepts any liability to any person for the information (or the use of such information) which is provided in this draft report or incorporated into it by reference. The information in this draft report is provided on the basis that all persons having access to this draft report undertake responsibility for assessing the relevance and accuracy of its content. Victorian Competition and Efficiency Commission GPO Box 4379 MELBOURNE VICTORIA 3001 AUSTRALIA Telephone: (03) 9651 2211 Facsimile: (03) 9651 2163 www.vcec.vic.gov.au An appropriate citation for this publication is: Victorian Competition and Efficiency Commission 2006, Making the right choices: options for managing transport congestion, draft report, April. About the Victorian Competition and Efficiency Commission The Victorian Competition and Efficiency Commission is the Victorian Government’s principal body advising on business regulation reform and identifying opportunities for improving Victoria’s competitive position.
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation Division News
    Transportation Division News Volume 45 • Number 7/8 • July/August 2013 International Association of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail and Transportation Workers Futhey to step down following arbitration Proceedings will finalize SMART Transportation Division Constitution At the conclusion of the SMART Transporta - interpretations of various articles of the UTU’s upon until a final document has been decided tion Division’s Boston regional meeting July 3, Constitution as it is inserted into the SMWIA’s upon. Transportation Division President Mike Futhey bylaws to complete a final SMART Constitution. “The final document is not a final document announced he will step down from office, pend - Gottesman is again serving as the arbitrator in until that arbitration decision is made,” Futhey ing resolution of arbitration proceedings regard - the current proceedings. said. ing the union’s constitution. During a town hall forum at the Boston region - Under the articles of the current UTU Consti - In October 2011, Georgetown University law al meetings opening ceremonies July 1, Futhey tution, Assistant President and General Secre - professor Michael H. Gottesman ruled the agree - said agreement had been reached with most of tary & Treasurer John Previsich would be elevat - ment to create the International Association of the SMART constitution articles, but that sever - ed to fulfill Futhey’s unexpired term as president Sheet Metal, Air, Rail and Transportation al disputes remain. He indicated he would remain of the SMART Transportation Division. (SMART) Workers by a merger of the United in office through the arbitration process, devel - Futhey is the eighth president of the UTU, Transportation Union and the Sheet Metal oping the constitution language for the trans - currently known as the SMART Transportation Workers International Association was an portation division.
    [Show full text]
  • PTA Doc Annex 11
    Annex 11 Greater Manchester Passenger Transport Authority (GMPTA) GMPTA Policy Plan A11.2 The Strategic Development Plan, 1999, A11.1 The Public Transport Policy Plan is a statement is a companion document to the LTP. It sets out the of the Authority’s policies for the period 1999-2004. Authority’s broad investment proposals over a ten year It recognises the crucial strategic role of GMPTA in period, and is entirely consistent with the LTP strategy. developing the Greater Manchester public transport network in accordance with LTP objectives. Policies Role in delivering the Greater are set out according to seven key themes: Manchester transport strategy Passengers First – A11.3 The Authority has a county-wide responsibility adopting a clear customer-orientation in the for the promotion of public transport and as such will services that are co-ordinated, specified or take forward the public transport initiatives contained provided by the Authority in the LTP. This will be achieved by: Integrating the networks – bringing forward measures proposed under working with operators and other partners the Quality Partnership Agreement to which through the Integration Project to ensure that GMPTA is a joint signatory, along with the the different service networks such as bus, rail District Councils, the Highways Agency, and Metrolink complement each other, are easy public transport operators, Railtrack and to use and are integrated with cycling and Manchester Airport walking overseeing the implementation of the Building Partnerships – Metrolink ‘single
    [Show full text]
  • (Trafford Park Extension) Order Decision Letter
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³7I*0´ IRU± D WKH7UDQVSRUWIRU*UHDWHU0DQFKHVWHU /LJKW5DSLG7UDQVLW6\VWHP 7UDIIRUG 3DUN ([WHQVLRQ 2UGHU WKH 2UGHU WR EH PDGH XQGHU VHFWLRQV DQG RI WKH 7UDQVSRUWDQG:RUNV$FW 7:$ DQG E DGLUHFWLRQDVWRGHHPHGSODQQLQJSHUPLVVLRQIRUWKHGHYHORSPHQWSURYLGHG IRULQWKH2UGHUWREHLVVXHGXQGHUVHFWLRQ $ RIWKH7RZQDQG&RXQWU\3ODQQLQJ $FW ³WKHSODQQLQJGLUHFWLRQ´ 7KH2UGHUDQGGHHPHGSODQQLQJSHUPLVVLRQZRXOGDXWKRULVH7I*0WRFRQVWUXFWDQG RSHUDWH D NLORPHWUH H[WHQVLRQ RI WKH 0DQFKHVWHU 0HWUROLQN WUDP V\VWHP IURP WKH H[LVWLQJVWRSDW3RPRQDWKURXJK7UDIIRUG3DUNWRWKH7UDIIRUG&HQWUH7KH2UGHUZRXOG LQFOXGHSRZHUVIRU7I*0WRDFTXLUHFRPSXOVRULO\DQGE\DJUHHPHQWODQGDQGULJKWVLQODQG DQG WR XVH ODQG IRU WKH SXUSRVHV RI FRQVWUXFWLQJ RSHUDWLQJ DQG PDLQWDLQLQJ WKH QHZ 7UDIIRUG3DUN/LQH ³73/´ (QFORVHGZLWKWKLVOHWWHULVDFRS\RIWKH,QVSHFWRU¶VUHSRUW+LVFRQFOXVLRQVDUHVHW
    [Show full text]
  • SALFORD QUAYS SUPPORTED INTERNSHIP What Do We Expect from the Students?
    SALFORD QUAYS SUPPORTED INTERNSHIP What do we expect from the students? Able to use a Always on time The student MUST be motivated to mobile phone work. Travel Prepared for Independently Professional the day Where are we? Our classroom is in The Greenhouse. It is less than a 5 minute walk from the MediaCityUK tram stop, behind Salford University building and opposite Booths Supermarket. How to find us? We want all of our students to be as independent as they can be. This includes travelling to the classroom in the morning and to your placements. You can plan your journey to us by following this link https://my.tfgm.com/#/planner/ Step 1: Enter your home postcode Step 2: Enter our postcode (M50 2EQ) Step 3: Select ‘Arrive by’ in the dropdown box Step 4: Change the date to when you will be travelling and the time to 08:45 so you are early for college. Step 5: Select the method of travel you want to use. I will use the tram for this example. Step 6: Read the instructions and give it a go with support if you need to. How do you get here by tram? The Metrolink is one of the best ways to get to us as there are now THREE different stops on THREE different lines. The MediaCityUK line (Orange), Intu Trafford Centre line (Red) or the Eccles line (Light Blue). The nearest stop is MediaCityUK and as this is the end of the line everyone gets off the tram. Broadway on the Eccles line and Imperial War Museum on the Intu Trafford Centre line are nearby too.
    [Show full text]
  • VRE OPERATIONS BOARD MEETING April 16, 2021 – 9:00 A.M
    VRE OPERATIONS BOARD MEETING April 16, 2021 – 9:00 A.M. Finance Committee Meeting – Follows Adjournment of Operations Board Meeting VIA WebEx 1. Roll Call 2. Consent Agenda A. Resolution Finding Need to Conduct April 16, 2021 Meeting Electronically B. Approval of Agenda C. Authorization to Issue an Invitation for Bids for Repair and Overhaul of Air Brake Equipment D. Authorization to Issue an Invitation for Bids for Rehabilitation of Wheelsets and Traction Motor Assemblies 3. Approval of Minutes from the March 19, 2021 VRE Operations Board Meeting 4. Chair’s Comments 5. Chief Executive Officer’s Report 6. Virginia Railway Express Riders’ and Public Comment 7. Action Items: A. Authorization to Exercise a Contract Option and Amend a Task Order for Maintenance Services for VRE Facilities B. Authorization to Exercise a Contract Option for Custodial and Seasonal Services for VRE Facilities C. Authorization to Execute a Right of Entry Agreement for MCBQ Construction Activities Adjacent to the VRE Quantico Station Parking Lot D. Recommend Authorization to Execute the Amended and Restated Operating Access and Amended Master Lease Agreements with CSX Transportation 8. Information Items: A. Spending Authority Report B. Construction Manager/General Contractor (CM/GC) Alternative Delivery Method C. Use of Federal Relief Funds in the FY 2022 Operating Budget 9. Closed Session 10. Operations Board Member’s Time The Next VRE Operations Board Meeting will be on May 21, 2021- 9:00 A.M. 2 Virginia Railway Express Operations Board Resolution 2A-04-2021 Resolution Finding Need to Conduct April 16, 2021 Meeting Electronically WHEREAS, on March 12, 2020, the Governor of Virginia declared a state of emergency in Virginia in response to the spread of novel coronavirus, or COVID-19, a communicable disease of public health threat as so declared by the State Health Commissioner on March 7, 2020 (“COVID-19”); and, WHEREAS, in subsequent Executive Orders, particularly Executive Order Nos.
    [Show full text]
  • Mbta Commuter Rail
    ©Porter Grifford FACT SHEET FACT NETWORK STATS BOSTON, MA., USA Public Transport Authority: Massachusetts Bay MBTA Transport Authority Operating subsidiary: COMMUTER RAIL Keolis Commuter Services (2,394 employees) Innovative, technology-driven solutions put in Keolis (60%) place by Keolis Commuter Services (KCS), have SNCF (40%) kept both operational performance and patronage high on Boston’s commuter rail network. Network scope: - 640 km of double n July 2014, Keolis Commuter Service (KCS) was awarded track an eight-year contract to operate and maintain the MBTA’s - 14 lines - 141 stations (Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority) commuter I - 513 train units rail system, the sixth largest commuter rail network in North (coaches America. The network is part of a public transport system and locomotives) which also includes bus, metro, trams and ferries. Since the - 35 million award of the contract, KCS has worked with the MBTA to passengers per year revitalise an aging fleet, improve track and infrastructure, and increase both revenue and patronage. Since 2014, KCS has been operating 10,000 more train services annually, expanding its workforce 19% and operating on-time services 2% above the previous 10-year average. New technologies are helping the commuter rail to provide precise and useful network information for its passengers. > MASS TRANSIT NETWORK KEY ACHIEVEMENTS CUSTOMER SATISFACTION OPERATIONAL PERFORMANCE A recent MBTA customer We are performing more survey conducted by repair and capital work than SocialSphere recorded a ever before on both the 19% two-fold increase in customer network and rolling-stock. increase in the number of satisfaction in 2016 and On average, there are 28 our employees since 2014, 2017, largely thanks to a new more coaches available daily to better serve passengers passenger information centre compared to 2014, exceeding and the introduction of real- the contractual requirement.
    [Show full text]