DOCSLIB.ORG

Making the Right Choices: Options for Managing Transport Congestion

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Making the Right Choices: Options for Managing Transport Congestion Making the right choices: Options for managing transport congestion A draft report for further consultation and input April 2006 © State of Victoria 2006 This draft report is copyright. No part may be reproduced by any process except in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968 (Cwlth), without prior written permission from the Victorian Competition and Efficiency Commission. Cover images reproduced with the permission of the Department of Treasury and Finance, Victoria and VicRoads. ISBN 1-920-92173-7 Disclaimer The views expressed herein are those of the Victorian Competition and Efficiency Commission and do not purport to represent the position of the Victorian Government. The content of this draft report is provided for information purposes only. Neither the Victorian Competition and Efficiency Commission nor the Victorian Government accepts any liability to any person for the information (or the use of such information) which is provided in this draft report or incorporated into it by reference. The information in this draft report is provided on the basis that all persons having access to this draft report undertake responsibility for assessing the relevance and accuracy of its content. Victorian Competition and Efficiency Commission GPO Box 4379 MELBOURNE VICTORIA 3001 AUSTRALIA Telephone: (03) 9651 2211 Facsimile: (03) 9651 2163 www.vcec.vic.gov.au An appropriate citation for this publication is: Victorian Competition and Efficiency Commission 2006, Making the right choices: options for managing transport congestion, draft report, April. About the Victorian Competition and Efficiency Commission The Victorian Competition and Efficiency Commission is the Victorian Government’s principal body advising on business regulation reform and identifying opportunities for improving Victoria’s competitive position. The Commission has three core functions: • reviewing regulatory impact statements and advising on the economic impact of significant new legislation • undertaking inquiries into matters referred to it by the Victorian Government • improving the awareness of, and compliance with, competitive neutrality. For further information on the Victorian Competition and Efficiency Commission, visit our website at: www.vcec.vic.gov.au Opportunity for further comment You are invited to examine this draft report and provide comment on it within the Commission’s public inquiry process. The Commission will be accepting submissions commenting on this report and will be undertaking further consultation before delivering a final report to the Government. Submissions may be sent by mail, fax, audio cassette or email. By mail: Transport Inquiry Victorian Competition and Efficiency Commission GPO Box 4379 MELBOURNE VICTORIA 3001 AUSTRALIA By facsimile: (03) 9651 2163 By email: [email protected] The Commission should receive all submissions by close of business on Friday 9 June 2006. iii Terms of Reference VCEC Inquiry into Managing Transport Congestion I, John Brumby MP, Treasurer, pursuant to section 4 of the State Owned Enterprises (State Body—Victorian Competition and Efficiency Commission) Order (“the Order”), hereby direct the Victorian Competition and Efficiency Commission (“the Commission”) to conduct an inquiry into managing transport congestion in Victoria. Background An efficient, integrated system of roads and rail throughout Melbourne and in major regional cities is essential for the smooth transit of goods and people in a modern economy. Transport congestion can cause lengthy, often unanticipated delays in traffic on freight and people movement, which can generate unnecessary costs for business and inconvenience for households and the community at large. The Metropolitan Transport Plan sets out the Government’s strategic directions in relation to reliability of public transport, improving use of existing roads, improved service co-ordination and better demand management. To complement this, the Commission’s inquiry into the effectiveness of policy instruments and institutional structures at the Government’s disposal to implement the objectives of the Metropolitan Transport Plan will inform the development and application of future Victorian Government decisions. Scope of the inquiry The Commission is to inquire and report upon: (1) the nature and incidence of transport congestion: a) in Melbourne; b) in major regional cities of Geelong, Ballarat and Bendigo; and c) at key modal and inter-modal freight transport facility interfaces (including road junctions, the port, airport, and rail–road terminals). (2) the impact of transport congestion on businesses and supply chain efficiency in Victoria; (3) any present regulatory and institutional barriers to achieving progress in tackling existing transport congestion and effective traffic demand management; and (4) the potential application of approaches to tackling transport congestion used in other major international cities. iv The Commission should take into account any substantive studies or developments undertaken in Victoria and elsewhere—including by the Commonwealth and other States, and international best practice. Inquiry process In undertaking this inquiry, the Commission is to have regard to the objectives and operating principles of the Commission, as set out in section 3 of the Order. The Commission must also conduct the inquiry in accordance with section 4 of the Order. The Commission is to consult with key interest groups and affected parties, and may hold public hearings. The Commission should also draw on the knowledge and expertise of relevant Victorian Government departments and agencies. The Commission is to produce a draft report for consultative purposes and a final report is to be provided to me within twelve months of receipt of this reference. JOHN BRUMBY MP Treasurer 14 September 2005 v Preface The release of this draft report of the inquiry into managing transport congestion gives interested participants the opportunity to comment on the Commission’s analysis of transport congestion in Melbourne and the regional cities of Geelong, Ballarat and Bendigo and the options available to the Victorian Government for addressing it, prior to the presentation of the final report to government in September, 2006. In preparing this draft report, the Commission has sought to consult widely with a range of government departments and agencies, public and private operators, local governments, businesses and individuals with an interest in transport congestion. The Commission would like to acknowledge the contribution made by those who participated in the inquiry, via the many meetings and through submissions. The Commission has also benefited from their input, and particularly wishes to acknowledge the help of the Department of Infrastructure. The Commission invites written submissions on the draft report. These submissions may address any of the issues covered. In light of the submissions received, the Commission will hold public hearings as necessary. At the conclusion of consultation on the draft report, the Commission will produce a final report to be presented to the Victorian Government. The Order in Council establishing the Commission says that the Treasurer should publicly release the final report within six months of receiving it and that the Victorian Government should publicly release a response to the final report within six months of the Treasurer receiving it. The Commission looks forward to receiving feedback on the draft report. The Commissioners have declared to the Victorian Government all personal interests that could have a bearing on current and future work. Moreover, while the Commissioners confirm their belief that they have no personal conflicts of interest in regard to this inquiry, the Chairman wishes to disclose that he has shares in Transurban and ConnectEast. Graham Evans AO Robert Kerr Alice Williams Chairman Commissioner Commissioner vi Contents Opportunity for further comment iii Terms of reference iv Preface vi Contents vii Abbreviations xii Key messages xiv Overview xv 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Background to the inquiry 1 1.1.1 The transport context 1 1.1.2 Defining congestion 3 1.1.3 Possible costs of congestion 4 1.1.4 The policy context 6 1.2 Scope of the inquiry 9 1.2.1 Options not recommendations 9 1.2.2 An input into a broader decision-making process 10 1.2.3 Not solving specific congestion problems 10 1.2.4 Focus on achieving the Government’s policy objectives 11 1.3 Conduct of the inquiry 11 1.4 Report structure 12 PART A 2 The transport network 17 2.1 Physical characteristics 18 2.1.1 Roads 21 2.1.2 Urban public transport 22 2.1.3 Other modes including cycling, walking, taxis and motorcycles 24 2.1.4 Freight transport infrastructure 25 2.2 Usage of urban transport networks 29 2.3 Key drivers of transport usage patterns 33 2.3.1 Urban sprawl and dispersed land use 34 2.3.2 Flexibility of motor vehicles 37 2.3.3 Economic growth and changing economic structure 43 2.4 Dynamics of modal choice 44 2.5 Outlook for the demand for transport 48 CONTENTS vii 3 Nature and incidence of congestion 53 3.1 What is congestion? 53 3.2 Evidence for Melbourne and the regional cities 61 3.2.1 Previous studies 61 3.2.2 Patterns of congestion in Melbourne 64 3.2.3 Congestion and the public transport system 76 3.3 The underlying causes of congestion 83 3.3.1 Externalities associated with road use 83 3.3.2 Patterns of usage 85 3.3.3 Infrastructure issues 87 3.3.4 Public transport capacity 89 3.4 Implications 92 4 Regulatory and institutional
Load more

Recommended publications
  • WODONGA Train Crash 6.02
    RAIL INVESTIGATION REPORT Derailment of passenger train 8622, Sydney – Melbourne daylight XPT service Wodonga, Victoria 25 April 2001 ATSB Derailment of passenger train 8622, Sydney – Melbourne daylight XPT service ISBN 0 642 20047 5 odonga 6.02 W 1800 621 372 621 1800 www.atsb.gov.au Department of Transport and Regional Services Australian Transport Safety Bureau RAIL INVESTIGATION REPORT Derailment of passenger train 8622, Sydney – Melbourne daylight XPT service, Wodonga, Victoria 25 April 2001 ISBN 0 642 20047 5 June 2002 This report was produced by the Australian Transport Safety Bureau (ATSB), PO Box 967, Civic Square ACT 2608. Readers are advised that the ATSB investigates for the sole purpose of enhancing safety. Consequently, reports are confined to matters of safety significance and may be misleading if used for any other purpose. As ATSB believes that safety information is of greatest value if it is passed on for the use of others, copyright restrictions do not apply to material printed in this report. Readers are encouraged to copy or reprint for further distribution, but should acknowledge ATSB as the source. ii CONTENTS 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 2. INTRODUCTION 5 3. INVESTIGATION METHODOLOGY 7 4. FACTUAL INFORMATION 9 4.1.1 XPT background 9 4.1.2 Wodonga 10 4.2 Sequence of events 11 4.2.1 The incident 11 4.2.2 Subsequent events 13 4.3 Injuries 15 4.4 Damage 15 4.4.1 Damage to the train 15 4.4.2 Damage to the rail infrastructure 18 4.5 Train crew involved 20 4.6 Train Information 21 4.6.1 Train Consist 21 4.6.2 Rolling stock date
    [Show full text]
  • Manchester Metrolink Tram System
    Feature New Promise of LRT Systems Manchester Metrolink Tram System William Tyson Introduction to Greater city that could be used by local rail into the city centre either in tunnel or on Manchester services—taking them into the central the street. area—to complete closure and I carried out an appraisal of these options The City of Manchester (pop. 500,000) is replacement of the services by buses. Two and showed that closure of the lines had at the heart of the Greater Manchester options were to convert some heavy rail a negative benefit-to-cost ratio, and that— conurbation comprised of 10 lines to light rail (tram) and extend them at the very least—they should be kept municipalities that is home to 2.5 million people. The municipalities appoint a Passenger Transport Authority (PTA) for the Figure 1 Metrolink Future Network whole area to set policies and the Greater 1 Victoria Manchester Passenger Transport Executive 2 Shudehill 3 Market Street Rochdale Town Centre 4 Mosley Street (GMPTE) to implement them. Buses Newbold Manchester 5 Piccadilly Gardens Drake Street Piccadilly Kingsway Business Park 6 Rochdale provide most public transport. They are 7 St Peter's Square Railway Milnrow Station deregulated and can compete with each 8 G-Max (for Castlefield) Newhey London 9 Cornbrook other and with other modes. There is a 0 Pomona Bury - Exchange Quay local rail network serving Manchester, and = Salford Quays Buckley Wells ~ Anchorage ! Harbour City linking it with the surrounding areas and @ Broadway Shaw and Crompton # Langworthy also other regions of the country. Street $ Tradfford Bar trams vanished from Greater Manchester % Old Trafford Radcliffe ^ Wharfside* & Manchester United* in 1951, but returned in a very different * Imperial War Museum for the North* ( Lowry Centre form in 1992.
    [Show full text]
  • Submission Cover Sheets
    Submission Cover Sheet North East Link Project EES IAC 402 Request to be heard?: No, but please email me th Full Name: Phil Turner Organisation: Maroondah City Council Affected property: Attachment 1: Maroondah_Coun Attachment 2: Maroondah_Coun Attachment 3: Comments: To the North East Link Inquiry & Advisory Committee (IAC) Maroondah Council provides the following submission to the IAC, in relation to the EES for the North East Link project. While Council formally supports the objectives of the NEL project, I advise that the support of Maroondah Council has been conditional on appropriate traffic considerations being made with regard to the impact of the project on the Eastlink tunnels, the Ringwood Bypass and by extension the Ringwood Metropolitan Activity Centre. Council previously commissioned a review by O’Brien Traffic that considered the project in the context of the tunnels and impacts on Ringwood, and it was determined that without ancillary works to take traffic pressure off the Eastlink tunnels and the Ringwood Bypass, the project would potentially fail and have a major detrimental impact on the viability of the Ringwood Metropolitan Activity Centre. The O’Brien Traffic report attached to this submission details the basis for those concerns. Council’s concerns were previously forwarded to NELA and Council officers have met with NELA officers on these matters, however, to date Council has not received an appropriate response that addresses these concerns, including within the ESS. In support of this submission, the following documents have also been uploaded: o A submission letter signed by Council’s Mayor Rob Steane documenting the history of Council’s dealings regarding NEL, and outlining Council’s concerns current with the project; o Council Report September 2018; o O’Brien Traffic Review dated 12 September 2017; o Council letter to NELA (26 February 2018) and NELA response (14 March 2018); o Correspondence from Council on Bypass concerns (including technical reports); and o Minutes from MCC / NELA meetings 6 April 2018 and 30 April 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • NORTH WEST Freight Transport Strategy
    NORTH WEST Freight Transport Strategy Department of Infrastructure NORTH WEST FREIGHT TRANSPORT STRATEGY Final Report May 2002 This report has been prepared by the Department of Infrastructure, VicRoads, Mildura Rural City Council, Swan Hill Rural City Council and the North West Municipalities Association to guide planning and development of the freight transport network in the north-west of Victoria. The State Government acknowledges the participation and support of the Councils of the north-west in preparing the strategy and the many stakeholders and individuals who contributed comments and ideas. Department of Infrastructure Strategic Planning Division Level 23, 80 Collins St Melbourne VIC 3000 www.doi.vic.gov.au Final Report North West Freight Transport Strategy Table of Contents Executive Summary ......................................................................................................................... i 1. Strategy Outline. ...........................................................................................................................1 1.1 Background .............................................................................................................................1 1.2 Strategy Outcomes.................................................................................................................1 1.3 Planning Horizon.....................................................................................................................1 1.4 Other Investigations ................................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • Locolines Edition 68
    LOCOLINES Contents EDITION 68 APR 2017 Loco Lines is published by the Locomotive Secretary’s Report 3 Division of the Australian Rail, Tram & Bus Industry Union – Victorian Branch. Presidents Report 8 Loco Lines is distributed free to all financial Assistant Sec Report 10 members of the Locomotive Division. Retired Enginemen also receive the V/Line S.C.S Report 13 magazine for free. It is made available to non-members at a cost of $20.00 per year. V/Line Stranded Gauge 15 Advertisements offering a specific benefit to Locomotive Division members are Where is it? 1 6 published free of charge. Heritage groups are generally not charged for advertising or ‘A special train in half an hour’ Article 1 8 tour information. Maurice Blackburn 21 Views or opinions expressed in published contributions to Loco Lines are not necessarily those of the Union Office. V/Line Cab Committee Report 28 We also reserve the right to alter or delete text for legal or other purposes. ‘Livestock Traffic’ Article 30 Contributions are printed at the discretion Talkback with Hinch 3 2 of the publisher. Signal Sighting V/line 35 Loco Lines, or any part thereof, cannot be reproduced or distributed without the Nelsons Column 3 6 written consent of the Victorian Locomotive Division. ‘Australia’s forgotten Volunteers’ 38 Publisher Marc Marotta Retirements/ Resignations 40 Have your Say 4 1 Membership form 44 Locomotive Division Representatives Divisional Executive Divisional Councillors Secretary: ...........Marc Marotta 0414 897 314 Metropolitan : ……….......Paris Jolly 0422 790 624 Assist. Sec: ...Jim Chrysostomou 0404 814 141 Metropolitan :…….... President: .............Wayne Hicks 0407 035 282 Metropolitan : …....
    [Show full text]
  • Public Transport Partnerships
    PUBLIC TRANSPORT PARTNERSHIPS An Overview of Passenger Rail Franchising in Victoria March 2005 Department of Infrastructure PUBLIC TRANSPORT PARTNERSHIPS An Overview of Passenger Rail Franchising in Victoria March 2005 Public Transport Division Department of Infrastructure © State of Victoria 2005 Published by Public Transport Division Department of Infrastructure 80 Collins Street, Melbourne March 2005 www.doi.vic.gov.au This publication is copyright. No part may be reproduced by any process except in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968. Authorised by the Victorian Government, 80 Collins Street, Melbourne. Minister’s Foreword In February 2004, after the failure of the original privatisation framework, the Victorian Government entered into new franchise agreements with Melbourne’s public transport companies, Yarra Trams and Connex. These partnership agreements find the balance between government support for public transport in Melbourne and the operational expertise provided by experienced private rail operators. Almost one year on, the new arrangements are running smoothly, providing stability across the public transport system and giving a solid foundation for a range of improvements in service delivery. Some of the other benefits to passengers that stem from these agreements include: • Additional front-line customer service staff; • Increased security patrols; • Improved driver training programs; • All night New Year’s Eve services; • Additional rolling stock; and • Improved standards for the upkeep of transport facilities. The key themes of this summary report include the background to the failure of the original contracts, the renegotiations, the nature of the new partnership agreements and the challenges of the refranchising process. You can obtain the latest information about Melbourne’s public transport by visiting www.doi.vic.gov.au/transport I commend this report to you.
    [Show full text]
  • Rail Accident Report
    Rail Accident Report Derailment of a tram at Pomona, Manchester 17 January 2007 Report 09/2008 April 2008 This investigation was carried out in accordance with: l the Railway Safety Directive 2004/49/EC; l the Railways and Transport Safety Act 2003; and l the Railways (Accident Investigation and Reporting) Regulations 2005. © Crown copyright 2008 You may re-use this document/publication (not including departmental or agency logos) free of charge in any format or medium. You must re-use it accurately and not in a misleading context. The material must be acknowledged as Crown copyright and you must give the title of the source publication. Where we have identified any third party copyright material you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. This document/publication is also available at www.raib.gov.uk. Any enquiries about this publication should be sent to: RAIB Email: [email protected] The Wharf Telephone: 01332 253300 Stores Road Fax: 01332 253301 Derby UK Website: www.raib.gov.uk DE21 4BA This report is published by the Rail Accident Investigation Branch, Department for Transport. Derailment of a tram at Pomona, Manchester 17 January 2007 Contents Introduction 4 Summary of the report 5 Key facts about the accident 5 Identification of immediate cause, causal and contributory factors and underlying causes 6 Recommendations 6 The Accident 7 Summary of the accident 7 The parties involved 8 Location 9 The tram 9 Events during the accident 9 Events following the accident 10 The Investigation 11 Sources of
    [Show full text]
  • Level Crossing Collision Between Steam Passenger Train 8382 and Loaded B-Double Truck
    RAIL SAFETY INVESTIGATION 2002/0003 Level Crossing Collision Between Steam Passenger Train 8382 and Loaded B-double Truck Benalla, Victoria 13 October 2002 RAIL SAFETY INVESTIGATION 2002/0003 Level Crossing Collision Between Steam Passenger Train 8382 and Loaded B-double Truck Benalla, Victoria, 13 October 2002 The map section identified in this publication is reproduced by permission of Geoscience Australia, Canberra. Crown Copyright ©. All rights reserved. www.ga.gov.au Other than for the purposes of copying this publication for public use, the map information from the map section may not be extracted, translated, or reduced to any electronic medium or machine readable form for incorpora- tion into a derived product, in whole or part, without prior written consent of Geoscience Australia, Canberra. Rail enthusiast photographs identified in this publication are reproduced by permission of the owners K. Lofhelm and R. Taylor Copyright ©. All rights reserved. Other than for the purposes of copying this publication for public use, the rail enthusiast photographs may not be extracted, translated, or reduced to any electronic medium or machine readable form for incorporation into a derived product, in whole or part, without prior written consent of the owner/s. ISBN 18 77071 81 1 September 2004 Readers are advised that the Australian Transport Safety Bureau investigates for the sole purpose of enhancing transport safety. Consequently, Bureau reports are confined to matters of safety significance and may be misleading if used for other purposes. It is ATSB policy to publish and widely distribute in full such reports as an educational tool to increase awareness of the causes of rail accidents so as to improve rail safety.
    [Show full text]
  • I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~I 1Frastructure Library I Contents I Executive Summary
    I Department of Planning & Development I Department of Housing and Regional Development MELBOURNE METROPOLITAN STRATEGY I STRATEGIC INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS & PROGRAMS I FINAL REPORT I SOUTH EAST REGION I I I I I I I I I I SINCLAIR KNIGHT MERZ/ N I E I R in association with I Spiller Gibbins Swan Pty Ltd · · Travers Morgan Ply Ltd I Loder & Bayly Consulting Group October 1995 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~I 1frastructure Library I Contents I Executive Summary I 1. Introduction 1 1.1 Purpose of Study 1 1.2 Definition of Region 2 I 1.3 Study Context 3 I 2. Study Process 5 3. Development of a Strategic Framework 7 3.1 Policy Analysis/Context 7 I 3.2 Region Description 8 3.3 Views of Stakeholders 16 3.3.1 Industry Surveys 16 I 3.3.2 Agency, Institution and Local Government Survey Responses 17 3.3.3 Responses to Advertisements 19 3.3.4 Regional Workshop 1 19 'I 3.3.6 Regional Workshop 2 22 3.4 Future Changes 23 3.4.1 Current Trends and Expected Growth 23 I 3.4.2 Other Drivers of Change 28 3.5 Regional Objectives, Vision and Projects 30 3.6 Economic Development Strategy Framework 33 I 3.6.1 Regional Competitive Strengths and Weaknesses 33 3.6.2 Regional Economic Strategy Framework 36 I 3.6.3 Summary 38 4. Projects and Project Packages 40 I 4.1 Project Selection 40 4.2 Project Descriptions 44 I 5.
    [Show full text]
  • North East Link Melways Map April 2019
    d Cal Donnybr der Fwy ook R d enty R Pl d m R E y p w p H eha i n a L g b a l R n e d c Mickl e M Ridd f i e l le d R d R d Pascoe Vale Rd Yan Yean Rd Plenty Rd Craigieburn R d d t-Coimadai R s Res Gisbourne-Mel Hume Hwy Digger Sydney Rd d ean R t Some Melbourne on R rton R d an Y Y A new traffic light free connection for the Ring Road, Airport d 1 EPPING Hume Fwy Greensborough Bypass, Greensborough Road Dalton Rd M80 Ring Road Ryans Rd Tul lamarine Fwy d Melbourne Airport enty R Metrpolitan Ring Rd Pl Maroondah Hwy and North East Link. Camp Rd Melton Hwy Cal Camp Rd der Fwy S BUNDOORA ELTHAM y W oad dne es SYDENHAM t ern Fwy y R GLENROY d RESERVOIR tern Ring R Greensborough Road rebuilt on both sides of North East pass Essendon 2 1 es Airport gh By W ou W Murr bor ay Rd oad Bell St High St Greens Link for local, toll-free trips. R attle Main Rd d CityLink Settlement Rd k d ROSANNA e R ST ALBANS Buckl Mahoneys Rd ey St d e R r ation R St ges t T d S ena r Brunswick R St Geor ee d Through traffic on North East Link and Greensborough n mond C 3 o ia Hopkins R SUNSHINE t Hel R DONCASTER s D Eastern Fwy p St d BALWYN Eastern Fwy Road under Grimshaw Street to keep traffic flowing and 2 m e RINGWOOD FOOTSCRAY oondah Hwy Bal KEW K Mar lan R BOX HILL d St Helena Rd CBD y Rd RICHMOND erbur cut congestion in all directions.
    [Show full text]
  • Manchester Metrolink – Operator Maintainer • the Challenges • Next Steps Metrolink
    Keolis Amey Metrolink Jen McKinney Summary • Manchester Metrolink – Operator Maintainer • The Challenges • Next Steps Metrolink • Keolis Amey Joint Venture - KAM • Keolis international passenger transport business • Amey leading supplier of consulting and infrastructure support services UK and internationally • Involved in 3 JV’s – Metrolink, London Docklands Light Railway, and Wales and Borders • Manchester Metrolink owned by Transport for Greater Manchester (TfGM) • 2017 appointed KAM as Operator and Maintainer of Metrolink - 10 years • The UK’s largest tramway Manchester Metrolink • 7 routes • +800 staff • 93 stops • 2 depots • 120 trams • Trafford Park line (2020) adds 6 more stops (from Pomona to • +37 million passengers a year intu Trafford Park) Metrolink • Opened in 1992 31 km and subsequently expanded • Bombardier M5000 high floor tram, operating as singles or doubles • 750v dc • Two depots - Queens Rd and Trafford • 95km track – mostly double track • Utilises combination of ex heavy rail corridor and on street routes • Ballasted track and street running embedded track • Vignole and grooved rail • OLE – mix of twin and single contact wire The Challenges - Track • Ride Quality – temporary speed restrictions • Rail breaks - Suspended Gauge Corner Restoration Welding OLE – Corporation St – Ferrule Event: Failure of copper ferrule on span wire. This secures the steel wire in a loop at its end to attach to other components. Cause: Lab testing confirmed incorrect grade of copper used for ferrule at installation. Ferrule Impact: 1CC closed for whole day Action: All ferrules inspected, but fatigue is hidden on the inside. Clamps as “belt and braces” trialled. Renewal proposal for further clamps to be Clamp installed. OLE – Weaste – Parafil Rope Event: Failure of parafil rope - insulated supporting rope.
    [Show full text]
  • Tfgm Blank Document Template
    Monitoring and Evaluation Second Report March 2021 1 Table of Contents 1 Executive Summary .................................................................................................... 4 1.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................... 4 1.2 Findings in relation to transport objectives ...................................................... 4 1.3 Findings in relation to economic and social objectives ..................................... 6 1.4 Next steps .......................................................................................................... 7 2 Introduction ................................................................................................................ 8 2.1 Purpose of this report ........................................................................................ 8 2.2 Research questions ............................................................................................ 8 2.3 Structure of this report .................................................................................... 10 3 Achievement of transport-related objectives .......................................................... 11 3.1 Make-up of usage of Phase 3 lines .................................................................. 11 3.2 Attractiveness to car available travellers and modal shift evidence............... 12 3.3 Implications of mode shift evidence ............................................................... 13 3.4 Explanatory factors
    [Show full text]