I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~I 1Frastructure Library I Contents I Executive Summary

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~I 1Frastructure Library I Contents I Executive Summary I Department of Planning & Development I Department of Housing and Regional Development MELBOURNE METROPOLITAN STRATEGY I STRATEGIC INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS & PROGRAMS I FINAL REPORT I SOUTH EAST REGION I I I I I I I I I I SINCLAIR KNIGHT MERZ/ N I E I R in association with I Spiller Gibbins Swan Pty Ltd · · Travers Morgan Ply Ltd I Loder & Bayly Consulting Group October 1995 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~I 1frastructure Library I Contents I Executive Summary I 1. Introduction 1 1.1 Purpose of Study 1 1.2 Definition of Region 2 I 1.3 Study Context 3 I 2. Study Process 5 3. Development of a Strategic Framework 7 3.1 Policy Analysis/Context 7 I 3.2 Region Description 8 3.3 Views of Stakeholders 16 3.3.1 Industry Surveys 16 I 3.3.2 Agency, Institution and Local Government Survey Responses 17 3.3.3 Responses to Advertisements 19 3.3.4 Regional Workshop 1 19 'I 3.3.6 Regional Workshop 2 22 3.4 Future Changes 23 3.4.1 Current Trends and Expected Growth 23 I 3.4.2 Other Drivers of Change 28 3.5 Regional Objectives, Vision and Projects 30 3.6 Economic Development Strategy Framework 33 I 3.6.1 Regional Competitive Strengths and Weaknesses 33 3.6.2 Regional Economic Strategy Framework 36 I 3.6.3 Summary 38 4. Projects and Project Packages 40 I 4.1 Project Selection 40 4.2 Project Descriptions 44 I 5. Project Assessment 65 5.1 Assessment Process 65 5.2 Relationship to Strategic Framework 70 II 5.3 Project Program and Costs 70 6. Implementation: Urban Management Structures 71 I 6.1 Background 71 6.2 Guiding Principles 71 6.3 Management Options 72 I 6.4 Delivery of Strategic Programs • Some Options 73 6.5 The Preferred Approach 75 I 6.6 Summary 76 I I l_.I I I I References 78 I Appendices (Bound in separate volume) Appendix A - National, State and Metropolitan Policies I Appendix 8 - Policies of Regional Organisations I Appendix C - Policies of Local Govemment Appendix D - Strategic Objectives of Service Providers I Appendix E - Detailed Description of Region I Appendix F - Industry and Business Interviews Appendix G - Long List of Projects I Appendix H - Response to Advertisement Appendix I - Workshops 1 and 2 Reports I Appendix J - SWOT Analysis I Appendix K - Project Descriptions Appendix L - Evaluation Tables - Performance Criteria I Appendix M - Special Note - Road Access I Appendix N - Study Team I I I I I I I I I I I Executive Summary I Background This report was commissioned by the Commonwealth Government I through the Department of Housing and Regional Development and the Victorian Department of Planning and Development to identify infrastructure projects In the south east region of Melbourne which would I strengthen the economic position of Australia, of Victoria and of the region. Although the focus of the study was to be based primarily on an economic framework, considerations were to include broader issues such I as quality of life (livability) and sustainability. I This report was prepared by a consortium of consultants comprising: o Sinclair Knight Merz Project management, transport planning and engineering; I o National Institute of Economic and Industry Research (NIEIR) Economic analysis and assessment, freight analysis; I o Spiller Gibbins Swan Urban economics and planning; I o Loder & Bayly Consulting Group Transport planning, urban and social planning; and I o Travers Morgan Public transport planning. I The Commonwealth selected the south east region of Melbourne together with the north west region because these regions were seen to be critical to the economic well being of Victoria and the nation. The south east I region was an area where it was recognised that the provision of infrastructure had lagged behind rapid post war urban development. The study area is shown in Figure E.1. The north west region was also I the subject of a separate and concurrent study, by Ratio Consultants in association with DJA Maunsell and others. I The Process the Study Followed This study, which extended from January to June 1995, followed a process which emphasised the following: I o Intense consultation with all the levels of government, with private industry with government agencies and regional authorities. I D The examination of a wide range of issues relating to urban development which included economic, land use, engineering services, transport, technology, recreation, conservation and social I issues. I SINClAIR KNIGHT MERZJNIEIR CONSORTJJM 5R046.102.BJF:mh:17/10/95 I I I I I o high quality tourism assets (e.g. in the outer east and peninsula). Tourism Is a strong export growth sector; I o a strong base in tertiary educational services, particularly based on Monash University (and including the Monash Medical Centre). This part of the service sector is an important export growth sector in its I own right, as well as being central to the development of regional employment skills; I o a deep water port (at Hastings). Ports are traditionally focii of economic activity and they are scarce assets; o generally good internal road connectivity. This is important in I retention of business and attraction of new businesses. Road congestion, which exists at several locations. can be a significant I reason firms relocate out of a region; o an extensive radial rail network. This gives good access opportunities for residents to work elsewhere (along or near the I radial routes), assisting development of the residential base of the region; I o a core of well developed urban centres (e.g. Ringwood, Dandenong, Glen Waverley, Knox, Frankston). Urban centres are the places where higher order services growth tends to concentrate. Without I such centres, opportunities to share in this economic growth are diminished; I o slightly higher income levels than the rest of Melbourne. This underpins a strong retail trade sector and generally high quality urban assets and also helps provide the domestic markets on which I export growth is often built; o green space and other high quality environmental assets. These are I important contributors to breathing space and to the environmental amenity of the region, an important component of high quali.ty living environments, which attract people who can build new businesses. I These competitive strengths are obviously not all unique. For example, a skilled workforce is common to many parts of Melbourne. However, taken in combination, they add up to a significant package of attractions for I business growth and help explain why the region's growth is projected to slightly exceed that of Melbourne as a whole over the period to 2011 . I See Section 3.4 and Appendix E. The analysis of the region's economic characteristics. together with consultations held during the course of the study, however, have also I indicated that the region faces some competitive weaknesses. which act I SINClAR KNIGHT MERlJNIEIR CONSORTlJM 5R046.t02.BJF:mh:17 /10/95 iii I I I I I as inhibitors of regional economic development. As with the competitive strengths, the weaknesses tend to apply to particular parts of the broader I region. The main competitive weaknesses can be summarised as follows: o poor connectivity to the main interregional, interstate and international transport nodes and links. Apart from access to/from the Gippsland I Region, these nodes and links are essentially in the central Melbourne area (e.g. Port of Melbourne, Dynon rail terminals) and in the north (Hume corridor), north-west (Tullamarine: Calder corridor) I and. west (Adelaide corridor). The region is the furthest from these nodes/links of any part of Melbourne and traffic congestion on key I access/egress links adds to the cost of this separation; o the region has large areas of relatively undifferentiated development. with little sense of place. This reduces their attraction as residential I and business locations for many owners/managers and firms; o the low density development which characterises the region mitigates against development of centres of concentrated higher-order I services employment. It should be added that this form of development is associated with high levels of dependence on car travel, the long term sustainability of which is increasingly coming I into question on greenhouse gas emission grounds; o the major Dandenong centre has a poor image and lacks the local I occupational base for growth of higher-order services employment and the local high income levels to support more extensive retail and I services development; o parts of the core region have suffered considerable manufacturing employment loss and have a perceived image as being relatively I undesirable locations; o much of the workforce in the core is not qualified for employment in I those sectors with better growth prospects; o the Port of Hastings is not able to handle non-bulk cargoes and is losing trade in its bulk markets (e.g. as Bass Strait oil supplies wind I down); ,, .I D public transport services are perceived as being unreliable and unsafe, which acts as a counter to the advantage of an extensive radial network. They are perceived to have inadequate frequency, I coverage and coordination. I I SINCtAR KNIGHT MERlJNIEIR CONSOR11UM 5R046.to2.BJF:mh:17/10/95 iv I ,....--------------------------------~~---- I I I I The Recommended Economic Strategy Framework for the Region The region has many attributes which create the potential for economic I growth. For example, overall it has high existing and projected population growth rates: in the main It is an attractive place to live and work; it has the structure in place for a comprehensive intra-regional I transport network (both radially from the central business district and for cross-regional communication); it has an extensive system of major centres of activity which provide a high order of goods and services; and I it has good access to a wide range of educational, recreational and cultural activities.
Recommended publications
  • Making the Right Choices: Options for Managing Transport Congestion
    Making the right choices: Options for managing transport congestion A draft report for further consultation and input April 2006 © State of Victoria 2006 This draft report is copyright. No part may be reproduced by any process except in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968 (Cwlth), without prior written permission from the Victorian Competition and Efficiency Commission. Cover images reproduced with the permission of the Department of Treasury and Finance, Victoria and VicRoads. ISBN 1-920-92173-7 Disclaimer The views expressed herein are those of the Victorian Competition and Efficiency Commission and do not purport to represent the position of the Victorian Government. The content of this draft report is provided for information purposes only. Neither the Victorian Competition and Efficiency Commission nor the Victorian Government accepts any liability to any person for the information (or the use of such information) which is provided in this draft report or incorporated into it by reference. The information in this draft report is provided on the basis that all persons having access to this draft report undertake responsibility for assessing the relevance and accuracy of its content. Victorian Competition and Efficiency Commission GPO Box 4379 MELBOURNE VICTORIA 3001 AUSTRALIA Telephone: (03) 9651 2211 Facsimile: (03) 9651 2163 www.vcec.vic.gov.au An appropriate citation for this publication is: Victorian Competition and Efficiency Commission 2006, Making the right choices: options for managing transport congestion, draft report, April. About the Victorian Competition and Efficiency Commission The Victorian Competition and Efficiency Commission is the Victorian Government’s principal body advising on business regulation reform and identifying opportunities for improving Victoria’s competitive position.
    [Show full text]
  • I I I I I I I I I I I
    Department of Planning & Development I. Department of Housing and Regional Development I MELBOURNE METRO PO LITAN STRATEGY I STRATEGIC INFRASTRUCTURE DEVIELOPMiENT I PROJECTS & PROGRAMS · I FINAL REPORT APPENDICES SOUTH EAST REGION I I I I I I I I I I I I SINCLAIR KNIGHT MERZ I N I E I R in association with I Spiller Gibbins Swan Pty Ltd Travers Morgan Pty Ltd I Loder & Bayly Consulting Group I October 1995 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Department of Planning & Development .I Department of Housing and Regional Developm_ent . ; •• J MELBOURNE METROPOLITAN STRATEGY STRATEGIC INFRASTRUCTURE .. I INFRASTRUCTURE LIBRARY l . DEVELOPMENT \\\i\~~~~~~~~li!~~~\11] PROJECTS & PROGRAMS ·.I ~ ~-~~ -----~---- FINAL REPORT APPENDICES I SOUTH .EAST REGION I .. ·Ii I I Transport Library I· ·I· I I ~ ·I - - - - - -- --- -- --- 711. 4099 00105983 451 MEL:M M lb t . 1 l ·I (1 995) e ourne me r~po 1tan i strategy : strateg1c v. 2 copy 2 infrastructure development projects and program~. l I South East Region : final 1 -~~---~---~~~~--~ . ~- - ) 1- SINCLAIR KNIGHT MERZ I N I E I R in association with .1 Spiller Gibbins Swan Pty_ Ltd . :J Travers Morgan Pty Ltd :I Loder & Bayly Consulting Group ·. ! . • J I October 1995 ..r l I LIST OF APPENDICES I Appendix A- National, State .. and Metropolitan Policies I· Appendix B - Policies of Regional Organisations - Appendix C - Policies of Local Government I Appendix D - Strategic Objectives of Service Providers I Appendix E -:- Detailed Description of Region Appendix F - Industry and Business Interviews I .
    [Show full text]
  • Assembly Weekly Book 10 Jul 2007-Dec 2007
    PARLIAMENT OF VICTORIA PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY FIFTY-SIXTH PARLIAMENT FIRST SESSION Thursday, 19 July 2007 (Extract from book 10) Internet: www.parliament.vic.gov.au/downloadhansard By authority of the Victorian Government Printer The Governor Professor DAVID de KRETSER, AC The Lieutenant-Governor The Honourable Justice MARILYN WARREN, AC The ministry Premier, Minister for Multicultural Affairs and Minister for Veterans’ Affairs.............................................. The Hon. S. P. Bracks, MP Deputy Premier and Minister for Water, Environment and Climate Change...................................................... The Hon. J. W. Thwaites, MP Minister for Education............................................ The Hon. J. Lenders, MLC Minister for Skills, Education Services and Employment and Minister for Women’s Affairs................................... The Hon. J. M. Allan, MP Minister for Gaming, Minister for Consumer Affairs and Minister assisting the Premier on Multicultural Affairs ..................... The Hon. D. M. Andrews, MP Minister for Victorian Communities and Minister for Energy and Resources.................................................... The Hon. P. Batchelor, MP Treasurer, Minister for Regional and Rural Development and Minister for Innovation......................................... The Hon. J. M. Brumby, MP Minister for Police and Emergency Services and Minister for Corrections................................................... The Hon. R. G. Cameron, MP Minister for Agriculture..........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Traffic Impact Assessment.Pdf
    Traffic and Transport Assessment 54-60 Cubitt Street, Cremorne – Office Development Traffic and Transport Assessment 54-60 Cubitt Street, Cremorne – Office Development V200238 Prepared for Gywnne St Developments PTY LTD 12 November 2020 12 November 2020 Cardno i Traffic and Transport Assessment 54-60 Cubitt Street, Cremorne – Office Development Contact Information Document Information Cardno Victoria Pty Ltd Prepared for Gywnne St Developments ABN 47 106 610 913 PTY LTD Project Name 54-60 Cubitt Street, Level 4 Cremorne – Office 501 Swanston Street Development Melbourne VIC 3000 Australia File Reference V200238REP001F03.docx www.cardno.com Job Reference V200238 Phone +61 3 8415 7777 Fax +61 3 8415 7788 Date 12 November 2020 Version Number F03 Author(s): James Aloi Effective Date 12/11/2020 Engineer – Traffic, Transport & Parking Approved By: Eric Kydd Date Approved 12/11/2020 Associate – Traffic, Transport & Parking Document History Version Effective Date Description of Revision Prepared by Reviewed by D01 14/05/2020 First Draft James Aloi Eric Kydd D02 26/05/2020 Final Draft James Aloi Eric Kydd F01 29/05/2020 Final Report James Aloi Eric Kydd F02 13/10/2020 Final Report - RFI Response James Aloi Eric Kydd F03 12/11/2020 Amended Final Report James Aloi Eric Kydd © Cardno. Copyright in the whole and every part of this document belongs to Cardno and may not be used, sold, transferred, copied or reproduced in whole or in part in any manner or form or in or on any media to any person other than by agreement with Cardno. This document is produced by Cardno solely for the benefit and use by the client in accordance with the terms of the engagement.
    [Show full text]
  • South East Transport Strategy South East Integrated Transport Group
    South East Transport Strategy South East Integrated Transport Group Final Transport Strategy IS220000/SETS | 4 August 2018 Final Transport Strategy South East Transport Strategy Project No: IS220000 Document Title: Final Transport Strategy Document No.: IS220000/SETS Revision: 4 Date: 8 August, 2018 Client Name: South East Integrated Transport Group Project Manager: Emily White Author: Emily White/Tabitha Yeoh File Name: J:\IE\Projects\03_Southern\IS220000\21 Deliverables\Stage 2 Report\South East Transport Strategy - V4.docx Jacobs Group (Australia) Pty Limited ABN 37 001 024 095 Floor 11, 452 Flinders Street Melbourne VIC 3000 PO Box 312, Flinders Lane Melbourne VIC 8009 Australia T +61 3 8668 3000 F +61 3 8668 3001 www.jacobs.com © Copyright 2018 Jacobs Group (Australia) Pty Limited. The concepts and information contained in this document are the property of Jacobs. Use or copying of this document in whole or in part without the written permission of Jacobs constitutes an infringement of copyright. Limitation: This document has been prepared on behalf of, and for the exclusive use of Jacobs’ client, and is subject to, and issued in accordance with, the provisions of the contract between Jacobs and the client. Jacobs accepts no liability or responsibility whatsoever for, or in respect of, any use of, or reliance upon, this document by any third party. Document history and status Revision Date Description By Review Approved 1 April 2018 Draft Transport Strategy for Client Review TY/EW KM JR 2 May 2018 Draft Transport Strategy for SEMITG Member Review EW KM JR 3 July 2018 Final Transport Strategy EW KM JR 4 August 2018 Final Transport Strategy EW KM JR South East Transport Strategy 1 Final Transport Strategy Contents Foreword .......................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 24 November 2015
    KNOX CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Ordinary Meeting of Council Held at the Civic Centre 511 Burwood Highway Wantirna South On Tuesday 24 November 2015 KNOX CITY COUNCIL MINUTES FOR THE ORDINARY MEETING OF COUNCIL HELD AT THE CIVIC CENTRE, 511 BURWOOD HIGHWAY, WANTIRNA SOUTH ON TUESDAY 24 NOVEMBER 2015 AT 7.00 P.M. PRESENT: Cr T Holland (Mayor & Chairperson) Friberg Ward Cr P Lockwood Baird Ward Cr J Mortimore Chandler Ward Cr K Orpen Dobson Ward Cr A Gill (arrived at 7.13pm) Dinsdale Ward Cr L Cooper Scott Ward Cr D Pearce Taylor Ward Cr N Seymour Tirhatuan Ward Dr G Emonson Chief Executive Officer Dr I Bell Director – Engineering & Infrastructure Mr A Kourambas Director - City Development Ms J Truman Director – Corporate Development Ms K Stubbings Director – Community Services Ms F Cousins Acting Manager - Governance & Innovation THE MEETING OPENED WITH A PRAYER, STATEMENT OF ACKNOWLEDGEMENT AND A STATEMENT OF COMMITMENT “Knox City Council acknowledges we are on the traditional land of the Wurundjeri and Bunurong people and pay our respects to elders both past and present.” BUSINESS: Page Nos. 1. APOLOGIES AND REQUESTS FOR LEAVE OF ABSENCE Cr J Cossari 2. DECLARATIONS OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST Nil. 3. CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES MOVED: CR. PEARCE SECONDED: CR. LOCKWOOD 3.1 Confirmation of Minutes of Ordinary Meeting of Council held on Tuesday 27 October 2015 CARRIED MOVED: CR. PEARCE SECONDED: CR. LOCKWOOD 3.2 Confirmation of Minutes of Strategic Planning Committee Meeting held on Tuesday 10 November 2015 CARRIED MOVED: CR. PEARCE SECONDED: CR. LOCKWOOD 3.3 Confirmation of Minutes of Statutory Meeting of Council held on Wednesday 11 November 2015 CARRIED 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Eastern Subregion Residential Zones State of Play
    Managing Residential Development Taskforce Eastern Subregion Residential Zones State of Play 29 January 2016 © The State of Victoria Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning 2015 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence. You are free to re­use the work under that licence, on the condition that you credit the State of Victoria as author. The licence does not apply to any images, photographs or branding, including the Victorian Coat of Arms, the Victorian Government logo and the Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning (DELWP) logo. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ISBN 978­1­76047­023­4 (pdf/online) Disclaimer This publication may be of assistance to you but the State of Victoria and its employees do not guarantee that the publication is without flaw of any kind or is wholly appropriate for your particular purposes and therefore disclaims all liability for any error, loss or other consequence which may arise from you relying on any information in this publication. Accessibility If you would like to receive this publication in an alternative format, please telephone DELWP Customer Service Centre 136 186, email [email protected], via the National Relay Service on 133 677 www.relayservice.com.au. This document is also available on the internet at www.delwp.vic.gov.au RESIDENTIAL ZONES STATE OF PLAY EASTERN SUBREGION CONTENTS Introduction 1 Eastern Subregion 5 Boroondara 13 Knox 19 Manningham 24 Maroondah 30 Monash
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Priorities for Melbourne's East
    Connected. Healthy. Active. Home. Regional Priorities for Melbourne’s east. Fix the Belgrave and Lilydale lines Build a new station, upgrade existing stations, duplicate single track sections Rowville line Build heavy rail to Rowville in a single stage to provide fast transport options Monash jobs precinct Fund transport projects to secure 75,000 jobs and create 70,000 new jobs Regional Trails Fund high-priority trails to boost tourism, jobs and health outcomes. MAROONDAH MELBOURNE CBD Bayswater Business Precinct Providing shuttle buses to get workers to and WHITEHORSE from a major jobs hub. MONASH KNOX 2 | Eastern Region Group Contents About the East 4 Transport 6 Fix the Belgrave and Lilydale lines 6 Rowville rail 8 Monash jobs hub 9 Regional trails 10 Bayswater jobs hub 12 Community sport 14 Women in sport 14 Regional Sports Park The Park will be a Home of Basketball and Regional sports park 15 provide facilities for other sports Oakleigh Recreation Centre 16 A home for regional cricket Support hockey's growth 17 Expand Jubilee Pavilion to cater for demand, particularly from females Regional mountain bike destination 18 A home for regional cricket 19 Oakleigh Recreation Centre Fund the Recreation Centre to boost gymnastics, volleyball and other sports Housing affordability 20 Additional funds for housing associations 20 Mountain bike destination New facility would attract 432,000 visitors creating jobs and improving health Housing affordability as a national priority 21 Support hockey's growth Youth mental health 22 Fund new hockey pitch and regional hockey feasibility study New headspace services 22 Early intervention services 23 The eastern region of Melbourne stretches from the middle and outer ring suburbs of Glen Waverley, Box Hill and Ringwood, to townships such as Yarra Junction and Olinda in the Yarra Valley and Dandenong Ranges.
    [Show full text]
  • Making the Right Choices: Options for Managing Congestion
    Making the right choices: Options for managing transport congestion A draft report for further consultation and input April 2006 © State of Victoria 2006 This draft report is copyright. No part may be reproduced by any process except in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968 (Cwlth), without prior written permission from the Victorian Competition and Efficiency Commission. Cover images reproduced with the permission of the Department of Treasury and Finance, Victoria and VicRoads. ISBN 1-920-92173-7 Disclaimer The views expressed herein are those of the Victorian Competition and Efficiency Commission and do not purport to represent the position of the Victorian Government. The content of this draft report is provided for information purposes only. Neither the Victorian Competition and Efficiency Commission nor the Victorian Government accepts any liability to any person for the information (or the use of such information) which is provided in this draft report or incorporated into it by reference. The information in this draft report is provided on the basis that all persons having access to this draft report undertake responsibility for assessing the relevance and accuracy of its content. Victorian Competition and Efficiency Commission GPO Box 4379 MELBOURNE VICTORIA 3001 AUSTRALIA Telephone: (03) 9651 2211 Facsimile: (03) 9651 2163 www.vcec.vic.gov.au An appropriate citation for this publication is: Victorian Competition and Efficiency Commission 2006, Making the right choices: options for managing transport congestion, draft report, April. About the Victorian Competition and Efficiency Commission The Victorian Competition and Efficiency Commission is the Victorian Government’s principal body advising on business regulation reform and identifying opportunities for improving Victoria’s competitive position.
    [Show full text]
  • Vision for the Future Australia's Most Liveable City
    Council Meeting Tuesday 2 October 2018 Notice and Agenda of Meeting to be held in the Function Centre, Bunjil Place, Narre Warren Commencing at 6.30 p.m. Vision for the future Australia’s most liveable city. Chairperson: Mayor, Councillor Geoff Ablett Members: Deputy Mayor Wayne Smith BJ, JP Deputy Mayor Amanda Stapledon Councillor Sam Aziz Councillor Rosalie Crestani Councillor Rex Flannery Councillor Milla Gilic Councillor Tim Jackson Councillor Gary Rowe Councillor Damien Rosario Councillor Susan Serey Chief Executive Officer: Glenn Patterson ORDER OF BUSINESS 1. Reading of the Prayer and Faith Message 2. Statement of Acknowledgement 3. Apologies 4. Confirmation of Minutes of: • Council Meeting, Tuesday 17 September 2018 5. Declaration by Councillors of any Conflict of Interest or Personal Interests pursuant to Sections 79 and 79B of the Local Government Act 1989 (the Act) in any items on the Notice Paper. (Note that Section 79(2)(a)(i) of the Act requires Councillors to disclose the nature of a Conflict of Interest or a Personal Interest immediately before the relevant consideration or discussion). Section 79B also requires that the Councillor declaring a Personal Interest must seek consent from Council to be exempt from voting on the item. 6. Officers’ Reports – Initial Consideration Item.1m Subject Council Page Plan Number Reference 6.1 South East Transport Strategy 7.1 1 6.2 219 South Gippsland Highway Cranbourne 7.3 6 6.3 Development in Werribee Regarding Small Scale 6.1 8 Agriculture and Food Tourism Opportunities 6.4 Examples of Innovative Housing Developments 5.1 13 6.5 Audit and Ethics Committee – Appointment of Interview 8.3 17 Panel to Appoint an Independent Public Member 6.6 Smart Cities Advisory Committee Meetings 1.1 18 6.7 Live Streaming of Council Meetings 8.1 21 6.8 Contract Acceptance and Sealing – Contract No 8.1 24 CT000468 6.9 Variation to Contract CT000203 Receipt & Processing 5.4 28 of Recycling Materials with SKM Industries Pty Ltd 7.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 RACV Growing Pains Brochure
    Growing OUTER Pains MELBOURNE > RACV’s blueprint for road and public transport projects needed in outer Melbourne RACV’S BLUEPRINT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC TRANSPORT PROJECTS NEEDED IN OUTER MELBOURNE AND PUBLIC TRANSPORT PROJECTS ROAD FOR BLUEPRINT RACV’S GROWING PAINS Population growth Growing pains A great place to live For Melbourne to be a world-class connected city, our transport Melbourne’s outer suburbs are a great place to live. The extra networks must reach well beyond its centre. space, proximity to nature and affordable land make the outer RACV recognises how important our outer suburbs are to the fringe an attractive place for Melburnians to buy their first Whittlesea overall health and vitality of our city, but is concerned by the home, settle or retire. But none of the financial and lifestyle Hume 4.1% following facts: benefits of living in the outer suburbs can be realised if daily 2.8% Nillumbik commutes are exhausting and even local travel is a struggle. • Victoria’s population is forecast to increase from just over 0.2% 6 million to approximately 10 million by 2050. Most will settle RACV wants outer communities to enjoy a wide range of in Greater Melbourne, many in outer suburbs. transport options that are seamlessly linked, safe, convenient, Melton efficient and affordable. To achieve these goals, RACV calls for 4.3% 6 7 17 Yarra Ranges • By 2031, our population in the outer suburbs will have 8 overtaken the total population of Melbourne’s inner and urgent upgrades to ageing and stressed transport networks 16 0.5% middle suburbs.
    [Show full text]