DOCSLIB.ORG

Prehistory of Uralic Studies Mediaeval Sources First Texts Renaissance: Finno-Ugrians Enter the European Learning First Comparis

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Prehistory of Uralic Studies Mediaeval Sources First Texts Renaissance: Finno-Ugrians Enter the European Learning First Comparis http://homepage.univie.ac.at/Johanna.Laakso/Padova2006/ Prehistory of Uralic studies First accounts on Uralic peoples (?) – Pytheas of Massilia (ca. 380–310 BC): Thule – in Norway or in Estonia (tule- ‘fire’)?? – Tacitus: Germania (98 AD): Fenni etc. (cetera iam fabulosa... Tuomo Pekkanen: Hellusi and Oxiones as shamans with elk or bear (Fi. *oksi) masks?) Jordanes: Getica (551 AD): Thiudos Inaunxis, Vasinabroncae, Merens, Mordens, Imniscaris... Screrefennae, Finni mitissimi... – Ottar of Hålogaland (ca. 890 AD): travels to Finnas, Terfinnas, Beormas Mediaeval sources • Old Russian chronicles (Nestor ca. 1100 AD &c): Finnic (Sum, Jam, Korela) and other FU tribes (Merja, Muroma, Meščera) • Heinrici Chronicon Lyvoniae (12th-13th century): Estonian & Livonian names, some words and phrases • First accounts on Hungarians in old Arabic, Persian & Byzantine sources • early travellers in Russia (Brother Julianus in Magna Hungaria in the 1230s &c) First texts • Hungarian: Funeral sermon (Halotti Beszéd) ca. 1200 • Permic/Komi: Old Komi literary language (14th – 17th/18th century?) • Finnic: Novgorod birchbark letter 292 (early 13th century) Renaissance: Finno-Ugrians enter the European learning • Humanism, Reformation, interest in vernacular languages • Reformation: new literary languages (Finnish, Estonian) • Diplomacy and business relations with Russia > information about Russian minorities First Comparisons: Background • Many loanwords (e.g. Germanic > Finnic, Slavic > Hungarian) correctly identified already in the 16th and 17th century • Ideological background – Early Nationalism > search for classical or biblical origins of the national language – search for national origins and primeval homes – Reformation > cultivation of vernacular languages > interest in language teaching and multilingualism (J. A. Comenius/Komenský 1592–1670 &c), first attempts at European language typology Guesses at FU relatedness • Bengt Skytte (1614–1683): contacts with Comenius, Fi.-Hu. lexical comparisons • Martin Fogel (1635–1675): De Finnicae Linguae Indole Observationes (published 1893): lex. & gramm. comparisons between Finnish and Hungarian • Georg Stiernhielm (1598–1672) in his edition of “Codex argenteus”: bene multa vocabula Ungarica... Finnis communia • Spontaneous observations by 16th-17th century travellers, diplomats etc. Focus on Field Linguistics • Projects initiated at European universities (G. W. von Leibniz &c) • Projects initiated in Russia (D. G. Messerschmidt, P. S. Pallas &c), missionary work in Russia http://homepage.univie.ac.at/Johanna.Laakso/Padova2006/ in the late 18th century • The Carolins (Ph. J. v. Strahlenberg &c) The Founding Fathers • János Sajnovics: Demonstratio idioma Ungarorum et Lapponum idem esse 1770 • Sámuel Gyarmathi: Affinitas linguae Hungaricae cum linguis Fennicae originis grammatice demonstrata 1799 • contemporary phenomena: – Indo-European language relatedness discovered, birth of comparative-historical linguistics – Romantic Nationalism, national revival and language reform in Hungary Institutionalization of FU Studies • First university chairs for national philologies: Hungarian 1791, Finnish 1850 > gradual professionalization of Finno-Ugristics • Dramatic increase in dictionaries, grammars, textbooks etc.; first etymological dictionaries appear (Budenz 1873–81, Donner 1874–88) • FU relatedness and status as discipline established; Indo-Europeanists sporadically interested The First Field Linguists • A. J. Sjögren (1794–1855): Finno-Ugrist and Caucasologist (St. Petersburg Academy) • M. A. Castrén (1813–1852): First Professor of Finnish in Helsinki, founding father of Sibirology and Samoyedology • Antal Reguly (1819–1858): expeditions to Russia and Siberia, most material edited and published only posthumously The Golden Era of FU Field Linguistics in Russia • State support programmes, Finno-Ugrian Society (Helsinki, 1883–) • From ca. 1890 until World War I: stipendiates collecting language, folklore & ethnological observations among the Finno-Ugrians of Russia • Large materials and publication efforts (until late 20th century!): chrestomathies, dictionaries, text samples, folklore Neogrammarian Historical Linguistics • Positivism > focus on material & dialectology • Linguistics as a nature science, sound laws as laws of nature > focus on Lautgeschichte, meticulous phonetic transcription (FU transcription!) • Focus on phonology and lexicology (etymology, Wörter und Sachen), neglect of syntax (and morphology?) 20th-century FU Studies • Paradigm change in linguistics: Separation of comparative-historical Finno-Ugristics from national philologies, marginalization of historical linguistics • Rise and fall of the Soviet Union: – West of the Iron Curtain, Finno-Ugristics becomes an “archive science” – From massive language planning experiments in the 1920s to the Great Terror in the 1930s and increasing silent assimilation after WW II .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Haplotype Frequencies at the DRD2 Locus in Populations of the East European Plain
    BMC Genetics BioMed Central Research article Open Access Haplotype frequencies at the DRD2 locus in populations of the East European Plain Olga V Flegontova*1, Andrey V Khrunin1, OlgaILylova1, Larisa A Tarskaia1, Victor A Spitsyn2, Alexey I Mikulich3 and Svetlana A Limborska1 Address: 1Department of Human Molecular Genetics, Institute of Molecular Genetics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia, 2Medical and Genetics Scientific Centre, Russian Academy of Medical Sciences, Moscow, Russia and 3Institute of Arts, Ethnography and Folklore, National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, Minsk, Belarus Email: Olga V Flegontova* - [email protected]; Andrey V Khrunin - [email protected]; Olga I Lylova - [email protected]; Larisa A Tarskaia - [email protected]; Victor A Spitsyn - [email protected]; Alexey I Mikulich - [email protected]; Svetlana A Limborska - [email protected] * Corresponding author Published: 30 September 2009 Received: 9 March 2009 Accepted: 30 September 2009 BMC Genetics 2009, 10:62 doi:10.1186/1471-2156-10-62 This article is available from: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2156/10/62 © 2009 Flegontova et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Abstract Background: It was demonstrated previously that the three-locus RFLP haplotype, TaqI B-TaqI D-TaqI A (B-D-A), at the DRD2 locus constitutes a powerful genetic marker and probably reflects the most ancient dispersal of anatomically modern humans. Results: We investigated TaqI B, BclI, MboI, TaqI D, and TaqI A RFLPs in 17 contemporary populations of the East European Plain and Siberia.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethnic and Linguistic Context of Identity: Finno-Ugric Minorities
    ETHNIC AND LINGUISTIC CONTEXT OF IDENTITY: FINNO-UGRIC MINORITIES Uralica Helsingiensia5 Ethnic and Linguistic Context of Identity: Finno-Ugric Minorities EDITED BY RIHO GRÜNTHAL & MAGDOLNA KOVÁCS HELSINKI 2011 Riho Grünthal, Magdolna Kovács (eds): Ethnic and Linguistic Context of Identity: Finno-Ugric Minorities. Uralica Helsingiensia 5. Contents The articles in this publication are based on presentations given at the sympo- sium “Ethnic and Linguistic Context of Identity: Finno-Ugric Minorities” held at the University of Helsinki in March, 2009. Layout, cover Anna Kurvinen Riho Grünthal & Magdolna Kovács Cover photographs Riho Grünthal Introduction 7 Map on page 269 Arttu Paarlahti Maps on pages 280, 296, and 297 Anna Kurvinen Johanna Laakso Being Finno-Ugrian, Being in the Minority ISBN 978-952-5667-28-8 (printed) – Reflections on Linguistic and Other Criteria 13 ISBN 978-952-5667-61-5 (online) Orders • Tilaukset Irja Seurujärvi-Kari ISSN 1797-3945 Tiedekirja www.tiedekirja.fi “We Took Our Language Back” Vammalan Kirjapaino Oy Kirkkokatu 14 [email protected] – The Formation of a Sámi Identity within the Sámi Sastamala 2011 FI-00170 Helsinki fax +358 9 635 017 Movement and the Role of the Sámi Language from the 1960s until 2008 37 Uralica Helsingiensia Elisabeth Scheller Uralica Helsingiensia is a series published jointly by the University of Helsinki Finno-Ugric The Sámi Language Situation Language Section and the Finno-Ugrian Society. It features monographs and thematic col- in Russia 79 lections of articles with a research focus on Uralic languages, and it also covers the linguistic and cultural aspects of Estonian, Hungarian and Saami studies at the University of Helsinki.
    [Show full text]
  • Proto Baltic & Baltic Languages
    PROTO-BALTIC >>>|||<<< An excerpt of text from Virdainas © Jos. Pashka 2012 * Warning - RWA xenophobes may find this content emotionally disturbing. > Link to Google Translate URL < "People lie. The evidence doesn't lie " - Grissom. The IE Satem poly-ethnic Middle Dnieper Culture ( R1a1a1, Z280 w/ multiple variants ) appeared well over five thousand years ago in forested regions by the Middle & Upper Dnieper river and it's tributaries - also including a wide area extending East towards the Don, along with an early Northeastern variant (LWb allele, R1a1a1, Z280 Northern variants & Z92, L235 ) which developed of related East Baltic speaking forest-zone Fatyanovo-Balanovo cultures that spread North and East, up to the Ural Mountains, together are seen as Northern extensions ( 3300 - 1800 BCE, Loze 1992, Tab.1 ) of the poly-ethnic Corded Ware ( R1a- M417, Z283 ) culture horizon (re: mtDNA N1a1). [ Note - the (DNA) citations are only partial / general indicators.] There were altogether really quite a few (R1a1a1, Z280 Northern variants ) Baltic Satem speaking cultures - the early West Baltic ( Pamariai / Bay Coast ) Barrow culture in the West - the growing Middle Dnieper in the middle / with a Dnieper-Desna variant - and the geographically immense East Baltic speaking Fatyanovo-Balanovo cultures, settled among (and eventually merging with, among others) neighboring Finno-Ugrics ( N1c1) and Narva substratum on territory in the North & East - up to the Ural mountains and Kama-Volga rivers. A later phase of the Catacomb ( MVK - Mnogovalikovo ) & Pit- grave ( Poltavka ) influenced border Fatyanovo-Balanovo was the Corded Ware Abashevo culture. To the South of these bordered complexes like Sosnica, that later became the Baltic-type Milograd & Bondarikha ( > Jukhnovo ) cultures.
    [Show full text]
  • Book of Abstracts
    Congressus Duodecimus Internationalis Fenno-Ugristarum, Oulu 2015 Book of Abstracts Edited by Harri Mantila Jari Sivonen Sisko Brunni Kaisa Leinonen Santeri Palviainen University of Oulu, 2015 Oulun yliopisto, 2015 Photographs: © Oulun kaupunki ja Oulun yliopisto ISBN: 978-952-62-0851-0 Juvenes Print This book of abstracts contains all the abstracts of CIFU XII presentations that were accepted. Chapter 1 includes the abstracts of the plenary presentations, chapter 2 the abstracts of the general session papers and chapter 3 the abstracts of the papers submitted to the symposia. The abstracts are presented in alphabetical order by authors' last names except the plenary abstracts, which are in the order of their presentation in the Congress. The abstracts are in English. Titles in the language of presentation are given in brackets. We have retained the transliteration of the names from Cyrillic to Latin script as it was in the original papers. Table of Contents 1 Plenary presentations 7 2 Section presentations 19 3 Symposia 199 Symp. 1. Change of Finnic languages in a multilinguistic environment .......................................................................... 201 Symp. 2. Multilingual practices and code-switching in Finno-Ugric communities .......................................................................... 215 Symp. 3. From spoken Baltic-Finnic vernaculars to their national standardizations and new literary languages – cancelled ...... 233 Symp. 4. The syntax of Samoyedic and Ob-Ugric languages ...... 233 Symp. 5. The development
    [Show full text]
  • Counting Bases in the Samoyedic Languages: the Present and the Past
    UNIVERSITEIT VAN AMSTERDAM Graduate School for Humanities MA Program in General Linguistics MA Thesis Counting bases in the Samoyedic Languages: the present and the past Amsterdam 2016 Contents Preface 3 Acknowledgements 4 1. Introduction 5 2. Theoretical framework 7 2.1. Numeral systems and counting bases 7 2.2. Historical typology of numeral systems 8 2.3. Structural typology of numeral systems 9 3. Overview of characteristics of the Samoyedic languages 15 3.1 Samoyedic languages' ancestry and modern taxonomy 15 3.2 Sociolinguistic situation and documentation 18 3.3 Overview of linguistic characteristics of the Samoyedic languages 21 4. Samoyedic numerals 22 4.1 Proto-Uralic, proto-Finno-Ugric and proto-Samoyedic numerals 22 4.2. Samoyedic numerals: present state 28 4.3 Counting bases in the Samoyedic languages 31 4.3.1 Quaternary system 31 4.3.2 Septimal system 34 4.3.3 Nonary system 36 4.3.4 Decimal system 37 4.3.5 Vigesimal system 39 5. Discussion 40 6. Conclusion 42 References 43 !2 Preface Numeral systems seem to be one of the most captivating linguistic topics I have ever come across. I have started studying numerals just recently; however, I found this subject extremely interesting from the very beginning. People always had to count: the days, the food, each other, so numerals represent the material for both comparative and historical linguistics. I have chosen to work with the Uralic, more specifically Samoyedic numerals, as 3 years ago I took part in an expedition to the Yamal Nenets Autonomous District, where I studied Selkup and since then I have been working mostly on the Uralic languages and have never regretted this: the Uralic language family is for now my main linguistic interest.
    [Show full text]
  • The Origin of the Magyar-Hungarians, Language, Homeland, Migrations and Legends to the Conquest
    The Origin of The Magyar-Hungarians, Language, Homeland, Migrations • and Legends to the Conquest By Richard R. Perry Prof(' ~~() r. Higher Edu c:ll io n Margaret M. (Papp) Perry Assbtant Profcs.,or of Library Admill istrntioll THE ORIGIN OF THE MAGYAR­ HUNGARIANS, LANGUAGE, HOMELAND, MIGRATIONS AND LEGENDS TO THE CONQUEST This doclD7lent is not for sale. No part of the text , maps, or art work may be reproduced in any form without permission of the original authors and/ or publishers as listed in the Selected References. • Cover art Richard R. Perry by Professor, Higher Education Steve n Pecsenye Margaret M. (Papp) Perry Assistant Professor of Library Administration PREFACE This brief manuscript was prepared at the request of interested citizens of the Birmingham neighborhood of Toledo. Ohio for presentation as port of a lecture-seminar series associated with efforts to organize a Hungarian ethnic cultural center in that neighborhood. Many of the citizens are descendents of. and In the instance of the older persons themselves were, immigrants trom Hungary. Their knowledge of the early history of their homeland was sketchy; based in large part on oral traditions, folklore and almost void of any Information about their origins prior to the years 900 A .0. to 1,000 A .0. My interest in gathering and presenting this account stems from a long friendship with many of the people of the neighborhood resulting from my marriage to the former Margaret M. Papp who has coauthored this work and whose mother Katie Toth Papp and father Imre Papp immigrated to the United States in 1909 and 1910.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressus Duodecimus Internationalis Fenno-Ugristarum, Oulu 2015
    Congressus Duodecimus Internationalis Fenno-Ugristarum, Oulu 2015 Plenary Papers Edited by Harri Mantila Kaisa Leinonen Sisko Brunni Santeri Palviainen Jari Sivonen University of Oulu, 2015 Oulun yliopisto, 2015 Photographs: © Oulun kaupunki, Oulun yliopisto ISBN: 978-952-62-1071-1 Juvenes Print Preface The current volume contains the plenary papers of the XII Congress for Finno- Ugric Studies, held in Oulu, Finland in August 17–21, 2015. The congress did not have a specific theme, but the seven plenum papers represent all the traditional branches of Finno-Ugric scholarship: linguistics, culture and literature, archaeology, and cultural anthropology. In this volume, the papers are presented in alphabetical order. The volume is available in the Internet as well on the conference webpage. The congress had approximately 380 participants from 21 countries, and altogether 276 presentations were given. The Congress for Finno-Ugric Studies, Congressus Internationalis Fenno-Ugristarum, has been organized every five years since 1960, and in Finland it has formerly been held in Helsinki, Turku, and Jyväskylä. In accordance with other international congresses of today, the section papers are not published by the organizing institution, although this has been the practice in the previous Finno-Ugric congresses. In addition to the plenary sessions and sections, there were also 19 symposia in the congress, and many of them will produce their own publications. All abstracts are nevertheless published in the Book of Abstracts, available on the conference webpage. Harri Mantila President of XII Congress for Finno-Ugric Studies Contents Preface 3 Contents 5 Language endangerment and endangered Uralic languages 7 Lyle Campbell and Bryn Hauk, with Panu Hallamaa The Finno-Ugric message.
    [Show full text]
  • Sámi Prehistories: the Politics of Archaeology and Identity In
    OCCASIONAL PAPERS IN ARCHAEOLOGY 47 Carl-Gösta Ojala Sámi Prehistories The Politics of Archaeology and Identity in Northernmost Europe INSTITUTIONEN FÖR ARKEOLOGI OCH ANTIK HISTORIA UPPSALA UNIVERSITET 2009 Dissertation presented at Uppsala University to be publicly examined in Geijersalen, Centre for the Humanities, English Park Campus, Uppsala, Saturday, November 14, 2009 at 10:00 for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. The examination will be conducted in English. Abstract Ojala, C-G. 2009. Sámi Prehistories. The Politics of Archaeology and Identity in Northernmost Europe. Department of Archaeology and Ancient History. Occasional papers in archaeology 47. 353 pp. Uppsala. ISBN 978-91-506-2096-2. Throughout the history of archaeology, the Sámi (the indigenous people in northern Norway, Sweden, Finland and the Kola Peninsula in the Russian Federation) have been conceptualized as the “Others” in relation to the national identity and (pre)history of the modern states. It is only in the last decades that a field of Sámi archaeology that studies Sámi (pre)history in its own right has emerged, parallel with an ethnic and cultural revival among Sámi groups. This dissertation investigates the notions of Sámi prehistory and archaeology, partly from a research historical perspective and partly from a more contemporary political perspective. It explores how the Sámi and ideas about the Sámi past have been represented in archaeological narratives from the early 19th century until today, as well as the development of an academic field of Sámi archaeology. The study consists of four main parts: 1) A critical examination of the conceptualization of ethnicity, nationalism and indigeneity in archaeological research.
    [Show full text]
  • Mythic Discourses Studies in Uralic Traditions
    Mythic Discourses Studies in Uralic Traditions Edited by Frog, Anna-Leena Siikala and Eila Stepanova Studia Fennica Folkloristica The Finnish Literature Society (SKS) was founded in 1831 and has, from the very beginning, engaged in publishing operations. It nowadays publishes literature in the fields of ethnology and folkloristics, linguistics, literary research and cultural history. The first volume of the Studia Fennica series appeared in 1933. Since 1992, the series has been divided into three thematic subseries: Ethnologica, Folkloristica and Linguistica. Two additional subseries were formed in 2002, Historica and Litteraria. The subseries Anthropologica was formed in 2007. In addition to its publishing activities, the Finnish Literature Society maintains research activities and infrastructures, an archive containing folklore and literary collections, a research library and promotes Finnish literature abroad. Studia fennica editorial board Markku Haakana, professor, University of Helsinki, Finland Timo Kaartinen, professor, University of Helsinki, Finland Kimmo Rentola, professor, University of Turku, Finland Riikka Rossi, docent, University of Helsinki, Finland Hanna Snellman, professor, University of Helsinki, Finland Lotte Tarkka, professor, University of Helsinki, Finland Tuomas M. S. Lehtonen, Secretary General, Dr. Phil., Finnish Literature Society Pauliina Rihto, secretary of the board, M. A., Finnish Literature Society, Finland Editorial Office SKS P.O. Box 259 FI-00171 Helsinki www.finlit.fi Luvun otsikko Mythic Discourses Studies in Uralic Traditions Edited by Frog, Anna-Leena Siikala & Eila Stepanova Finnish Literature Society · Helsinki 3 Studia Fennica Folkloristica 20 The publication has undergone a peer review. The open access publication of this volume has received part funding via a Jane and Aatos Erkko Foundation grant.
    [Show full text]
  • The Prehistoric Context of the Oldest Contacts Between Baltic and Finnic Languages
    Santeri Junttila Department of Finnish, Finno-Ugrian and Scandinavian Studies University of Helsinki The prehistoric context of the oldest contacts between Baltic and Finnic languages Dating and locating the ancient contacts between Baltic and Finnic is a cru- cial question when searching for the origins of the Finnic languages. Evidence gained from linguistic palaeontology seems to place Proto-Uralic in the Volga- Kama Basin, some 2000 kilometres east of the Baltic, in a region where the Uralic Mari and Udmurt languages are still spoken today (see Toivonen 1952 for a well-detailed study of the fi eld and Häkkinen 2009 for a somewhat revised view). However, there is no clear linguistic or archaeological evidence to tell us when Proto-Uralic broke down into its different daughter languages and when one of these, Proto-Finnic, had left this eastern area and spread to the shores of the Baltic Sea. In order to reconstruct the process and its different stages we require information that can be provided by the Baltic loanwords. As the Baltic loanwords are not attested in the more eastern Uralic branches, with the exception of a relatively few lexical items in Mordvinic (cf. van Pareren 2008 and Grünthal, this volume, for a recent detailed overview of the question), we must assume that the contacts took place when Finnic already was an inde- pendent branch within the Uralic language family or was at least in the process of breaking off. The contacts cannot be located far away from where the Baltic languages are or have been spoken. The area in which the Baltic languages were spoken was prehistorically much wider than it is today, since the major hydro- nyms of a vast area between Moscow and the mouth of the Vistula are of Baltic origin (Toporov – Trubačev 1962).
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Report on Endangered Uralic Minority Cultures Rapporteur
    Ut i PACECOM0959641 Council of Europe / Conseil de l'Europe *** F-67075 Strasbourg cedex (France) Tel :+33/388 41 3081 * * Fax : +33 / 3 88 41 27 97 COUNCIL * * CONSEIL Email : [email protected] http://stars.coe.fr/ OF EUROPE * *DE L'EUROPE *** Parliamentary Assembly Assemblée parlementaire AS/Cult(1998)9rev. Cult98/full/aac9.98rev 6 May 1998 COMMITTEE ON CULTURE AND EDUCATION DRAFT REPORT ON ENDANGERED URALIC MINORITY CULTURES Rapporteur/ Mrs Isohookana-Asunmaa (Finland, LDR) Summary The Assembly wishes to draw attention to the endangered status of Uralic languages and cultures. More than 23 million people in the world speak languages belonging to the Uralic family. Most of them live in nation-states of their own. In Russia, they include the speakers of more than a dozen Uralic languages totalling some 3.3 million living as scattered minorities. In addition, there are the Sámi living both in Russia and in northern regions of Norway, Sweden and Finland as well as a now very small number of Livonians in Latvia. There are also the Ingrians, who are classed as Finns, and the Setus, a branch of the Estonians, also living in Russia. In order to preserve the Uralic languages and culture, thereby enriching a developing Europe, the Assembly should urge the Russian Federation and the other countries where these are present to support these people's languages, cultures and traditions, through education their own mother tongues and through publications and mass media in their languages. AS/Cult(1998)9 I. Preliminary draft recommendation 1. The Assembly is concerned at the endangered status of Uralic languages and cultures in Russia.
    [Show full text]
  • S13059-018-1522-1.Pdf
    Tambets et al. Genome Biology (2018) 19:139 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-018-1522-1 RESEARCH Open Access Genes reveal traces of common recent demographic history for most of the Uralic- speaking populations Kristiina Tambets1* , Bayazit Yunusbayev1,2, Georgi Hudjashov1,3, Anne-Mai Ilumäe1, Siiri Rootsi1, Terhi Honkola4,5, Outi Vesakoski4, Quentin Atkinson6,7, Pontus Skoglund8, Alena Kushniarevich1,9, Sergey Litvinov1,10, Maere Reidla1,11, Ene Metspalu1, Lehti Saag1,11, Timo Rantanen12, Monika Karmin1, Jüri Parik1,11, Sergey I. Zhadanov1,13, Marina Gubina1,14, Larisa D. Damba1,15, Marina Bermisheva1,10, Tuuli Reisberg1, Khadizhat Dibirova1,16, Irina Evseeva17,18, Mari Nelis19, Janis Klovins20, Andres Metspalu19, Tõnu Esko19, Oleg Balanovsky16,21, Elena Balanovska16, Elza K. Khusnutdinova10,22, Ludmila P. Osipova14,23, Mikhail Voevoda14,23,24, Richard Villems1,11, Toomas Kivisild1,11,25,26 and Mait Metspalu1 Abstract Background: The genetic origins of Uralic speakers from across a vast territory in the temperate zone of North Eurasia have remained elusive. Previous studies have shown contrasting proportions of Eastern and Western Eurasian ancestry in their mitochondrial and Y chromosomal gene pools. While the maternal lineages reflect by and large the geographic background of a given Uralic-speaking population, the frequency of Y chromosomes of Eastern Eurasian origin is distinctively high among European Uralic speakers. The autosomal variation of Uralic speakers, however, has not yet been studied comprehensively. Results: Here, we present a genome-wide analysis of 15 Uralic-speaking populations which cover all main groups of the linguistic family. We show that contemporary Uralic speakers are genetically very similar to their local geographical neighbours.
    [Show full text]