Sámi Prehistories: the Politics of Archaeology and Identity In

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Sámi Prehistories: the Politics of Archaeology and Identity In OCCASIONAL PAPERS IN ARCHAEOLOGY 47 Carl-Gösta Ojala Sámi Prehistories The Politics of Archaeology and Identity in Northernmost Europe INSTITUTIONEN FÖR ARKEOLOGI OCH ANTIK HISTORIA UPPSALA UNIVERSITET 2009 Dissertation presented at Uppsala University to be publicly examined in Geijersalen, Centre for the Humanities, English Park Campus, Uppsala, Saturday, November 14, 2009 at 10:00 for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. The examination will be conducted in English. Abstract Ojala, C-G. 2009. Sámi Prehistories. The Politics of Archaeology and Identity in Northernmost Europe. Department of Archaeology and Ancient History. Occasional papers in archaeology 47. 353 pp. Uppsala. ISBN 978-91-506-2096-2. Throughout the history of archaeology, the Sámi (the indigenous people in northern Norway, Sweden, Finland and the Kola Peninsula in the Russian Federation) have been conceptualized as the “Others” in relation to the national identity and (pre)history of the modern states. It is only in the last decades that a field of Sámi archaeology that studies Sámi (pre)history in its own right has emerged, parallel with an ethnic and cultural revival among Sámi groups. This dissertation investigates the notions of Sámi prehistory and archaeology, partly from a research historical perspective and partly from a more contemporary political perspective. It explores how the Sámi and ideas about the Sámi past have been represented in archaeological narratives from the early 19th century until today, as well as the development of an academic field of Sámi archaeology. The study consists of four main parts: 1) A critical examination of the conceptualization of ethnicity, nationalism and indigeneity in archaeological research. 2) A historical analysis of the representations and debates on Sámi prehistory, primarily in Sweden but also to some extent in Norway and Finland, focusing on four main themes: the origin of the Sámi people, South Sámi prehistory as a contested field of study, the development of reindeer herding, and Sámi pre- Christian religion. 3) An analysis of the study of the Sámi past in Russia, and a discussion on archaeological research and constructions of ethnicity and indigeneity in the Russian Federation and the Soviet Union. 4) An examination of the claims for greater Sámi self-determination concerning cultural heritage management and the debates on repatriation and reburial in the Nordic countries. In the dissertation, it is argued that there is a great need for discussions on the ethics and politics of archaeological research. A relational network approach is suggested as a way of opening up some of the black boxes and bounded, static entities in the representations of people in the past in the North. Keywords: Sámi, Sápmi, Sweden, Norway, Finland, Russian Federation, Soviet Union, history of archaeology, ethnogenesis, origins, South Sámi prehistory, ethnicity, nationalism, indigeneity, indigenous archaeology, ethnopolitics, cultural heritage management, repatriation, reburial, ethics, actor-network theory Carl-Gösta Ojala, Archaeology, Department of Archaeology and Ancient History, Box 626, Uppsala University, SE-75126 Uppsala, Sweden © Carl-Gösta Ojala 2009 ISSN 1100-6358 ISBN 978-91-506-2096-2 urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-108857 (http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-108857) Cover illustration: Lake Lovozero on the Kola Peninsula. Photograph by author. Printed in Sweden by Edita Västra Aros, Västerås 2009. Contents Acknowledgements....................................................................................................... 9 A note on language ..................................................................................................... 13 Introduction to the dissertation ................................................................................ 15 Aims ......................................................................................................................... 16 Outline of the dissertation.................................................................................... 17 About the structure of the study ......................................................................... 19 PART I: Networks of Archaeology Chapter 1. Ethnicity and identity in archaeological research ............................... 25 “One-entities” and “black boxes”: the delimiting of culture and people ..... 26 Approaches to ethnicity ........................................................................................ 28 Ethnicity as an archaeological concept............................................................... 30 Ethnicity and other forms of identity ................................................................. 32 Chapter 2. Nationalist, internationalist and indigenous archaeologies ............... 34 Nationalism and internationalism in archaeology............................................. 34 Indigenism in archaeology.................................................................................... 37 Discussion and critique of the concept of indigenism ............................... 40 Indigenous archaeology ................................................................................... 44 Chapter 3. Outline of a network approach to archaeology and identity ............ 47 Actor-Network Theory (ANT) and archaeology.............................................. 48 Archaeological networks....................................................................................... 50 A network approach to identity and ethnicity in archaeological research .... 52 Networks of Archaeology – Discussion.................................................................. 55 PART II: Mapping the North in the West Chapter 4. The North – cartographies of prehistory and identity....................... 64 Norrland, the North Calotte and the Barents Region...................................... 66 Northern Sweden as an archaeological field of study ...................................... 67 Sápmi – land and culture....................................................................................... 71 Who is Sámi?........................................................................................................... 74 Sámi prehistory and the Kven movement ......................................................... 78 Chapter 5. Representing the Sámi – a short historical outline............................. 82 Early written sources: ethnonyms and the Sámi people .................................. 83 The missionary accounts from the 17th and 18th centuries...................... 86 Lapponia by Johannes Schefferus.................................................................... 88 Colonization, missionary activities and exploitation of natural resources .... 89 Views on the Sámi in the late 19th and early 20th century ............................. 94 Revitalization, cooperation and globalization.................................................... 97 Chapter 6. Scientific discourses on Sámi prehistory and Sámi archaeology .... 103 The 19th century and early 20th century: from an indigenous to a foreign people....................................................................................................... 104 After the Second World War: modernization and assimilation.................... 106 Sámi prehistory in the 1980s: new debates on ethnicity and archaeology .. 109 Sámi archaeology in recent years: pluralism and internationalization.......... 112 Chapter 7. Debates in Sámi archaeology ............................................................... 115 The origin of the Sámi – the search for origins and authenticity................. 115 Autochthons or immigrants? ........................................................................ 116 The debates from the 1980s: the emergence of Sámi ethnicity............... 129 Sámi languages and Sámi origins.................................................................. 134 Genes, origins and ethnicity.......................................................................... 137 Sámi perspectives? .......................................................................................... 139 South Sámi prehistory – contested archaeology ............................................. 141 The theory of the late arrival of Sámi groups in the South Sámi area.... 143 Vivallen............................................................................................................. 145 Hunting-ground graves.................................................................................. 148 Archaeology in the legal courtrooms: The Härjedalen case..................... 155 New perspectives on South Sámi (pre)history........................................... 160 The emergence and development of reindeer herding and pastoralism ..... 164 Stalo-foundations and social change............................................................ 165 Sámi pre-Christian religion................................................................................. 169 Mapping the North in the West: Discussion ........................................................ 173 PART III: Mapping the North in the East Chapter 8. Identity, archaeology and the peoples of the North ........................ 182 The indigenous peoples of the North............................................................... 182 Archaeology and conceptions of the Northern peoples in pre-revolutionary Russia ..................................................................................... 188 Archaeological research
Recommended publications
  • Thesis.Pdf (4.587Mb)
    TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents INTRODUCTION................................................................................................1 Research Problem....................................................................................................................................1 My Study Cases........................................................................................................................................3 THEORY AND METHODOLOGY.....................................................................5 Overview...................................................................................................................................................6 Mapping the Concept of ‘Discourse’......................................................................................................7 The Ethics of Autobiography3................................................................................................................9 Making Meaning of My Experience in Tromsø, Sapmi and Norway................................................11 Focusing on Tromsø Indigenous Academia .......................................................................................12 International Indigenous Discourse. Political and Juridical Dimensions. .......................................14 Indigenous Movement and ‘Symbolic Action’ Strategy. A Sami Case.............................................16 Indigenous Academic Discourse6 in terms of Symbolic Action ........................................................20
    [Show full text]
  • A Critical Review of Norway's Policy on Sámi Language Maintenance
    Journal of Home Language Research (JHLR) Volume 1, 2016, pages 1-16 http://hdl.handle.net/10092/12906 Holding them at arm’s length: A critical review of Norway’s policy on Sámi language maintenance Nathan John Albury Center for Multilingualism in Society across the Lifespan, University of Oslo. Abstract Norway’s policy on its indigenous Sámi minority is oftentimes heralded as best practice in fostering self-determination and home language maintenance. Norway’s policy rhetoric indeed promises that all Sámi have a right to develop their home language, and that all Norwegian children will become familiar with Sámi languages and culture. However, this paper takes a more critical perspective of Norway’s policy. It argues that rhetoric has not been operationalised to benefit all Sámi nor promote Norwegian familiarity with the languages. Instead, the state appears to juggle its legislative obligations to promote the Sámi languages with an ongoing ideology in the community that the Sámi languages cannot be seen as contributing to the contemporary Norwegian nation. To make this argument, the paper firstly reviews the state’s Sámi language policy to discuss fractures between rhetoric and policy. It then reports the findings of a case study whereby public online debates over the past five years about the Sámi languages in a national context were critically analysed. The case study indeed reveals a vigorous preference to hold the Sámi languages at arm’s length, for reasons such as that the languages endanger Norwegian identity, that the Sámi do not deserve an indigenous status, that the Sámi are foreign to Norway and, conversely, that the Sámi do not fulfil their responsibilities as Norwegian citizens.
    [Show full text]
  • Border Fence Presentation
    Secura Fence System by Alabama Metal Industries Corporation U.S. / Mexico Border San Diego, CA Sector Pacific Ocean to the Otey Mesa Crossing Retired General Michael Hayden recently addressed a meeting of the Metals Service Center Institute. General Hayden was appointed to the post of the Director of National Security Agency and served from 1999- 2005. From April 2005 to May 2006 General Hayden was the number one intelligence officer in the country and in this capacity he oversaw the entire intelligence community, including the CIA, NSA, the National Geospatial – Intelligence Agency and the National Reconnaissance Office. In 2006 General Hayden served as the Director of the CIA. General Hayden addressed the Institute on the four hot spots in the world that jeopardize the security of the United States. Number one on his list was Iran. Number two, and this came as a real surprise to the Institute was Mexico, followed by Al Qaeda, and then North Korea. Mexico being so close to the United States and so high on his list of hot spots should not be underestimated. In 1997 the San Diego Sector of the U.S. border with Mexico was the number one illegal crossing point on the entire US / Mexico border. Because of the illegal crossing activity this area was identified for the first installation of new security border fencing. The area designated actually extended 1/4-mile out in the Pacific Ocean and eastward 16 miles to the Otey Mesa Border Crossing. This new fence was designed and installed to replace the old fence made from World War II landing mats.
    [Show full text]
  • Walls and Fences: a Journey Through History and Economics
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Vernon, Victoria; Zimmermann, Klaus F. Working Paper Walls and Fences: A Journey Through History and Economics GLO Discussion Paper, No. 330 Provided in Cooperation with: Global Labor Organization (GLO) Suggested Citation: Vernon, Victoria; Zimmermann, Klaus F. (2019) : Walls and Fences: A Journey Through History and Economics, GLO Discussion Paper, No. 330, Global Labor Organization (GLO), Essen This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/193640 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. www.econstor.eu Walls and Fences: A Journey Through History and Economics* Victoria Vernon State University of New York and GLO; [email protected] Klaus F. Zimmermann UNU-MERIT, CEPR and GLO; [email protected] March 2019 Abstract Throughout history, border walls and fences have been built for defense, to claim land, to signal power, and to control migration.
    [Show full text]
  • The Geographic Limits to Modernist Theories of Intra-State Violence
    The Power of Ethnicity?: the Geographic Limits to Modernist Theories of Intra-State Violence ERIC KAUFMANN Reader in Politics and Sociology, Birkbeck College, University of London; Religion Initiative/ISP Fellow, Belfer Center, Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Box 134, 79 John F. Kennedy St., Cambridge, MA 02138 [email protected] ——————————————————————————————————————————— Abstract This paper mounts a critique of the dominant modernist paradigm in the comparative ethnic conflict literature. The modernist argument claims that ethnic identity is constructed in the modern era, either by instrumentalist elites, or by political institutions whose bureaucratic constructions give birth to new identities. Group boundary symbols and myths are considered invented and flexible. Territorial identities in premodern times are viewed as either exclusively local, for the mass of the population, or ‘universal’, for elites. Primordialists and ethnosymbolists have contested these arguments using historical and case evidence, but have shied away from large-scale datasets. This paper utilizes a number of contemporary datasets to advance a three-stage argument. First, it finds a significant relationship between ethnic diversity and three pre- modern variables: rough topography, religious fractionalization and world region. Modernist explanations for these patterns are possible, but are less convincing than ethnosymbolist accounts. Second, we draw on our own and others’ work to show that ethnic fractionalization (ELF) significantly predicts the incidence of civil conflict, but not its onset . We argue that this is because indigenous ethnic diversity is relatively static over time, but varies over space. Conflict onsets, by contrast, are more dependent on short-run changes over time than incidents, which better reflect spatially-grounded conditioning factors.
    [Show full text]
  • Issue Information
    Juengst and Becker, Editors Editors and Becker, Juengst of Community The Bioarchaeology 28 AP3A No. The Bioarchaeology of Community Sara L. Juengst and Sara K. Becker, Editors Contributions by Sara K. Becker Deborah Blom Jered B. Cornelison Sylvia Deskaj Lynne Goldstein Sara L. Juengst Ann M. Kakaliouras Wendy Lackey-Cornelison William J. Meyer Anna C. Novotny Molly K. Zuckerman 2017 Archeological Papers of the ISSN 1551-823X American Anthropological Association, Number 28 aapaa_28_1_cover.inddpaa_28_1_cover.indd 1 112/05/172/05/17 22:26:26 PPMM The Bioarchaeology of Community Sara L. Juengst and Sara K. Becker, Editors Contributions by Sara K. Becker Deborah Blom Jered B. Cornelison Sylvia Deskaj Lynne Goldstein Sara L. Juengst Ann M. Kakaliouras Wendy Lackey-Cornelison William J. Meyer Anna C. Novotny Molly K. Zuckerman 2017 Archeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association, Number 28 ARCHEOLOGICAL PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN ANTHROPOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION Lynne Goldstein, General Series Editor Number 28 THE BIOARCHAEOLOGY OF COMMUNITY 2017 Aims and Scope: The Archaeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association (AP3A) is published on behalf of the Archaeological Division of the American Anthropological Association. AP3A publishes original monograph-length manuscripts on a wide range of subjects generally considered to fall within the purview of anthropological archaeology. There are no geographical, temporal, or topical restrictions. Organizers of AAA symposia are particularly encouraged to submit manuscripts, but submissions need not be restricted to these or other collected works. Copyright and Copying (in any format): © 2017 American Anthropological Association. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored or transmitted in any form or by any means without the prior permission in writing from the copyright holder.
    [Show full text]
  • History of Inter-Group Conflict and Violence in Modern Fiji
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Sydney eScholarship History of Inter-Group Conflict and Violence in Modern Fiji SANJAY RAMESH MA (RESEARCH) CENTRE FOR PEACE AND CONFLICT STUDIES UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY 2010 Abstract The thesis analyses inter-group conflict in Fiji within the framework of inter-group theory, popularised by Gordon Allport, who argued that inter-group conflict arises out of inter-group prejudice, which is historically constructed and sustained by dominant groups. Furthermore, Allport hypothesised that there are three attributes of violence: structural and institutional violence in the form of discrimination, organised violence and extropunitive violence in the form of in-group solidarity. Using history as a method, I analyse the history of inter-group conflict in Fiji from 1960 to 2006. I argue that inter- group conflict in Fiji led to the institutionalisation of discrimination against Indo-Fijians in 1987 and this escalated into organised violence in 2000. Inter-group tensions peaked in Fiji during the 2006 general elections as ethnic groups rallied behind their own communal constituencies as a show of in-group solidarity and produced an electoral outcome that made multiparty governance stipulated by the multiracial 1997 Constitution impossible. Using Allport’s recommendations on mitigating inter-group conflict in divided communities, the thesis proposes a three-pronged approach to inter-group conciliation in Fiji, based on implementing national identity, truth and reconciliation and legislative reforms. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This thesis is dedicated to the Indo-Fijians in rural Fiji who suffered physical violence in the aftermath of the May 2000 nationalist coup.
    [Show full text]
  • Courage and Thoughtful Scholarship = Indigenous Archaeology Partnerships
    FORUM COURAGE AND THOUGHTFUL SCHOLARSHIP = INDIGENOUS ARCHAEOLOGY PARTNERSHIPS Dale R. eroes Robert McGhee's recent lead-in American Antiquity article entitled Aboriginalism and Problems of Indigenous archaeology seems to emphasize the pitfalls that can occur in "indige nolls archaeology." Though the effort is l1ever easy, I would empha­ size an approach based on a 50/50 partnership between the archaeological scientist and the native people whose past we are attempting to study through our field alld research techniques. In northwestern North America, we have found this approach important in sharillg ownership of the scientist/tribal effort, and, equally important, in adding highly significant (scientif­ ically) cullUral knowledge ofTribal members through their ongoing cultural transmission-a concept basic to our explana­ tion in the field of archaeology and anthropology. Our work with ancient basketry and other wood and fiber artifacts from waterlogged Northwest Coast sites demonstrates millennia ofcultl/ral cOlltinuity, often including reg ionally distinctive, highly guarded cultural styles or techniques that tribal members continue to use. A 50/50 partnership means, and allows, joint ownership that can only expand the scientific description and the cultural explanation through an Indigenous archaeology approach. El artIculo reciente de Robert McGhee en la revista American Antiquity, titulado: Aborigenismo y los problemas de la Arque­ ologia Indigenista, pC/recen enfatizar las dificultades que pueden ocurrir en la "arqueologfa indigenista
    [Show full text]
  • The Making and Unmaking of Ethnic Boundaries: a Multilevel Process Theory1
    The Making and Unmaking of Ethnic Boundaries: A Multilevel Process Theory1 Andreas Wimmer University of California, Los Angeles Primordialist and constructivist authors have debated the nature of ethnicity “as such” and therefore failed to explain why its charac- teristics vary so dramatically across cases, displaying different de- grees of social closure, political salience, cultural distinctiveness, and historical stability. The author introduces a multilevel process theory to understand how these characteristics are generated and trans- formed over time. The theory assumes that ethnic boundaries are the outcome of the classificatory struggles and negotiations between actors situated in a social field. Three characteristics of a field—the institutional order, distribution of power, and political networks— determine which actors will adopt which strategy of ethnic boundary making. The author then discusses the conditions under which these negotiations will lead to a shared understanding of the location and meaning of boundaries. The nature of this consensus explains the particular characteristics of an ethnic boundary. A final section iden- tifies endogenous and exogenous mechanisms of change. TOWARD A COMPARATIVE SOCIOLOGY OF ETHNIC BOUNDARIES Beyond Constructivism The comparative study of ethnicity rests firmly on the ground established by Fredrik Barth (1969b) in his well-known introduction to a collection 1 Various versions of this article were presented at UCLA’s Department of Sociology, the Institute for Migration Research and Intercultural Studies of the University of Osnabru¨ ck, Harvard’s Center for European Studies, the Center for Comparative Re- search of Yale University, the Association for the Study of Ethnicity at the London School of Economics, the Center for Ethnicity and Citizenship of the University of Bristol, the Department of Political Science and International Relations of University College Dublin, and the Department of Sociology of the University of Go¨ttingen.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Trends, Local Contradictions − Challenges of Transnational Sámi Politics in 2000S
    79 Anni-Siiri Länsman & Veli-Pekka Lehtola Global Trends, Local Contradictions − Challenges of Transnational Sámi Politics in 2000s Today the Sámi have a relatively strong status in all Nordic countries, although the situation in everyday life can be inconsistent in many ways. Active Sámi-related legislation work has resulted in multilevel and fruitful development on local and regional levels especially in 1990s. Special institutions have emerged for the Sámi self-government, such as the Sámi Parliaments in each Nordic country. Sámi culture is a matter of pride for many, because different forms of Sámi art, for example, are internationally renowned. The Sámi also have a significant role in the politics of indigenous peoples of the world.1 The success of the Sámi has been due to transnational activities, shuttling from local and national levels to the Nordic Sámi community and to the cooperation of indigenous peoples. From the beginning, Sámi politics in Nordic countries has looked for international parallels and solutions. Already in the beginning of 20th century, the civil activity through Sámi organizations in Nordic countries was strongly influenced by international labor movement and youth association movement.2 In Finland, efforts for establishing protection areas for Sámi culture in Utsjoki and Skolt Sámi community were argumented by “Sámi friends” with parallels from Indian policies in United States and European human rights movement. 3 In the same way, Nordic Sámi cooperation from 1950s on referred e.g. to European minority policies where the linguistic rights were central.4 The ethno- political movement of young Sámi activists in 1960s and 1970s, highlighting the land rights and Sámi self-determination, orientated itself more and more to global 1 See e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Chicana/Os Disarticulating Euromestizaje By
    (Dis)Claiming Mestizofilia: Chicana/os Disarticulating Euromestizaje By Agustín Palacios A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Ethnic Studies in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Laura E. Pérez, Chair Professor José Rabasa Professor Nelson Maldonado-Torres Universtiy of California, Berkeley Spring 2012 Copyright by Agustín Palacios, 2012 All Rights Reserved. Abstract (Dis)Claiming Mestizofilia: Chicana/os Disarticulating Euromestizaje by Agustín Palacios Doctor of Philosophy in Ethnic Studies University of California, Berkeley Professor Laura E. Pérez, Chair This dissertation investigates the development and contradictions of the discourse of mestizaje in its key Mexican ideologues and its revision by Mexican American or Chicana/o intellectuals. Great attention is given to tracing Mexico’s dominant conceptions of racial mixing, from Spanish colonization to Mexico’s post-Revolutionary period. Although mestizaje continues to be a constant point of reference in U.S. Latino/a discourse, not enough attention has been given to how this ideology has been complicit with white supremacy and the exclusion of indigenous people. Mestizofilia, the dominant mestizaje ideology formulated by white and mestizo elites after Mexico’s independence, proposed that racial mixing could be used as a way to “whiten” and homogenize the Mexican population, two characteristics deemed necessary for the creation of a strong national identity conducive to national progress. Mexican intellectuals like Vicente Riva Palacio, Andrés Molina Enríquez, José Vasconcelos and Manuel Gamio proposed the remaking of the Mexican population through state sponsored European immigration, racial mixing for indigenous people, and the implementation of public education as a way to assimilate the population into European culture.
    [Show full text]
  • Finland's Context and Configuration
    CHAPTER 2 The Backdrop for Success: Finland’s Context and Configuration 1 Introduction Finland’s context plays a strong role in its outcomes in PISA. Following Phillips and Schweisfurth (2006) and Halls’ (1970) approaches to comparative educa- tion, this chapter explores Finland’s historical and social context in order to better understand the country’s educational achievements. An education sys- tem, as a “living thing,” according to Sadler (in Higginson, 1979, p. 49), merits investigation within its context. The Finns need and deserve more than a brief description to explain and clarify their unique qualities. The question, “Who are the Finns?” necessitates a long answer: But where does Finland belong? Is it a Baltic state, like Estonia? Is it part of Scandinavia, like Denmark, Norway, and Sweden, with which it is linked and with which it has such close ties? Is it really a part of Russia? Or is it something different from all these? A great part of Finnish history has been devoted to trying to solve this problem. (Bacon, 1970, p. 16) This chapter strives to clarify the Finnish context, and therefore how this even- tually influenced high PISA outcomes in all administrations of the survey. It also explains the Finnish education system after exploration of “things out- side the school system” (Sadler, in Higginson, 1979, p. 49). This approach will enlighten the context in which the education system lies. 2 History of Finland to Independence The Finnish people kept to themselves throughout their early history. “Due partly to the size of the country and their own small numbers, the Finns have striven throughout their history to live their own lives, avoid assimilation with their neighbours and remain aside from the quarrels of the rest of the world” (Juva, 1968, p.
    [Show full text]