Archaeology and Development / Peter G. Gould
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Reviews Skeleton: Some Thoughts on the Relocation of Cultural Heritage Disputes” (Gerstenblith)
159 Reviews Skeleton: Some Thoughts on the Relocation of Cultural Heritage Disputes” (Gerstenblith). Douglas Owsley and Richard Jantz interpret the Kennewick case as “a clash Edited by Charles R. Ewen between two systems of conceptualizing and tracing human history” (p. 141), although they assert that the origin of the lawsuit lies more with a lack of compliance with existing laws than with the ideological battle. In their chapter they Claiming the Stones/Naming the Bones: describe in great detail the myriad of research questions that Cultural Property and the Negotiation of the Kennewick skeleton raises and could potentially answer National and Ethnic Identity with further scientifi c study. ELAZAR BARKAN AND RONALD BUSH Patty Gerstenblith’s article, on the other hand, frames (EDITORS) the Kennewick case (and NAGPRA as a whole) in terms of social justice—returning to marginalized groups some Getty Research Institute, Los Angeles, control over their own pasts (and thus their cultural identi- CA, 2003. 384 pp., 33 illus., index. $50.00 ties). She argues from a particularistic stance, outlining the paper. long history that has served to disconnect Native American groups from their cultural patrimony through a privileging Claiming the Stones/Naming the Bones is a timely volume of scientifi c evidence while simultaneously, through displace- that attempts to crosscut multiple disciplines (including ment and policies of cultural eradication, making it diffi cult archaeology, physical anthropology, literature, cultural stud- obtain such evidence. ies, ethnomusicology, and museum studies) and offer per- Neither Owsley and Jantz nor Gerstenblith overtly draw spectives regarding disputes over the defi nition and owner- attention to global vs. -
Program of the 76Th Annual Meeting
PROGRAM OF THE 76 TH ANNUAL MEETING March 30−April 3, 2011 Sacramento, California THE ANNUAL MEETING of the Society for American Archaeology provides a forum for the dissemination of knowledge and discussion. The views expressed at the sessions are solely those of the speakers and the Society does not endorse, approve, or censor them. Descriptions of events and titles are those of the organizers, not the Society. Program of the 76th Annual Meeting Published by the Society for American Archaeology 900 Second Street NE, Suite 12 Washington DC 20002-3560 USA Tel: +1 202/789-8200 Fax: +1 202/789-0284 Email: [email protected] WWW: http://www.saa.org Copyright © 2011 Society for American Archaeology. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reprinted in any form or by any means without prior permission from the publisher. Program of the 76th Annual Meeting 3 Contents 4................ Awards Presentation & Annual Business Meeting Agenda 5………..….2011 Award Recipients 11.................Maps of the Hyatt Regency Sacramento, Sheraton Grand Sacramento, and the Sacramento Convention Center 17 ................Meeting Organizers, SAA Board of Directors, & SAA Staff 18 ............... General Information . 20. .............. Featured Sessions 22 ............... Summary Schedule 26 ............... A Word about the Sessions 28…………. Student Events 29………..…Sessions At A Glance (NEW!) 37................ Program 169................SAA Awards, Scholarships, & Fellowships 176................ Presidents of SAA . 176................ Annual Meeting Sites 178................ Exhibit Map 179................Exhibitor Directory 190................SAA Committees and Task Forces 194…….…….Index of Participants 4 Program of the 76th Annual Meeting Awards Presentation & Annual Business Meeting APRIL 1, 2011 5 PM Call to Order Call for Approval of Minutes of the 2010 Annual Business Meeting Remarks President Margaret W. -
Minjiwarra : Archaeological Evidence of Human Occupation of Australia's
This is a repository copy of Minjiwarra : archaeological evidence of human occupation of Australia’s northern Kimberley by 50,000 BP. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/161242/ Version: Accepted Version Article: Veth, P., Ditchfield, K., Bateman, M. orcid.org/0000-0003-1756-6046 et al. (5 more authors) (2019) Minjiwarra : archaeological evidence of human occupation of Australia’s northern Kimberley by 50,000 BP. Australian Archaeology, 85 (2). pp. 115-125. ISSN 0312-2417 https://doi.org/10.1080/03122417.2019.1650479 This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Australian Archaeology on 19th August 2019, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/03122417.2019.1650479. Reuse Items deposited in White Rose Research Online are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved unless indicated otherwise. They may be downloaded and/or printed for private study, or other acts as permitted by national copyright laws. The publisher or other rights holders may allow further reproduction and re-use of the full text version. This is indicated by the licence information on the White Rose Research Online record for the item. Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ Minjiwarra: archaeological evidence of human occupation of Australia’s northern Kimberley by 50,000 BP Peter Veth1, Kane Ditchfield1, Mark Bateman2, Sven Ouzman1, Marine Benoit1, Ana Paula Motta1, Darrell Lewis3, Sam Harper1, and Balanggarra Aboriginal Corporation4. -
Anthropology (AN) 1
Anthropology (AN) 1 AN-262 Primate Behavior, Evolution and Ecology Credits: 3 ANTHROPOLOGY (AN) Term Offered: Spring Term Course Type(s): None AN-103 Cultural Anthropology Credits: 3 The study of primatology, which examines the lifeways, biology, and Term Offered: All Terms behavior of our closest living relatives. Various topics will be explored Course Type(s): SS.SV including taxonomy and classification, diet, behavior, grouping patterns, Introduction to comparative study of human beliefs and behavior. locomotion, and land usage patterns of monkeys, apes and prosimians. Emphasis on the concepts used in studying human culture; analysis These topics will be explored within the frameworks of natural selection, of non-Western societies with respect to ecology, economy, social and sexual selection, and evolution. Also listed as BY-262. political organization, religion, and art; implications for American society. AN-263 Peoples and Cultures of South America Credits: 3 AN-104 Introduction to Biological Anthropology Credits: 3 Prerequisite(s): AN-103 or AN-113 Term Offered: All Terms Course Type(s): RE Course Type(s): HE.EL, HEPE, SS.SV A social and cultural survey of representative peoples in South America Introduction to physical anthropology; racial variation and the and the Caribbean, emphasizing the comparative study of economic, evolutionary origins of the human species; concepts and principles used political, social, and religious organization. in the study of living and fossil evidence for human evolution and genetic AN-264 North American Indians Credits: 3 diversity; unique influence of culture on human biology; human evolution Term Offered: All Terms in the present and future. Course Type(s): GU, RE AN-107 Introduction to Archaeology Credits: 3 A survey of the cultural, social and linguistic diversity of Pre-Columbian Term Offered: All Terms North American societies; problems of contemporary Indian groups. -
Issue Information
Juengst and Becker, Editors Editors and Becker, Juengst of Community The Bioarchaeology 28 AP3A No. The Bioarchaeology of Community Sara L. Juengst and Sara K. Becker, Editors Contributions by Sara K. Becker Deborah Blom Jered B. Cornelison Sylvia Deskaj Lynne Goldstein Sara L. Juengst Ann M. Kakaliouras Wendy Lackey-Cornelison William J. Meyer Anna C. Novotny Molly K. Zuckerman 2017 Archeological Papers of the ISSN 1551-823X American Anthropological Association, Number 28 aapaa_28_1_cover.inddpaa_28_1_cover.indd 1 112/05/172/05/17 22:26:26 PPMM The Bioarchaeology of Community Sara L. Juengst and Sara K. Becker, Editors Contributions by Sara K. Becker Deborah Blom Jered B. Cornelison Sylvia Deskaj Lynne Goldstein Sara L. Juengst Ann M. Kakaliouras Wendy Lackey-Cornelison William J. Meyer Anna C. Novotny Molly K. Zuckerman 2017 Archeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association, Number 28 ARCHEOLOGICAL PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN ANTHROPOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION Lynne Goldstein, General Series Editor Number 28 THE BIOARCHAEOLOGY OF COMMUNITY 2017 Aims and Scope: The Archaeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association (AP3A) is published on behalf of the Archaeological Division of the American Anthropological Association. AP3A publishes original monograph-length manuscripts on a wide range of subjects generally considered to fall within the purview of anthropological archaeology. There are no geographical, temporal, or topical restrictions. Organizers of AAA symposia are particularly encouraged to submit manuscripts, but submissions need not be restricted to these or other collected works. Copyright and Copying (in any format): © 2017 American Anthropological Association. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored or transmitted in any form or by any means without the prior permission in writing from the copyright holder. -
The Rock Art of Madjedbebe (Malakunanja II)
5 The rock art of Madjedbebe (Malakunanja II) Sally K. May, Paul S.C. Taçon, Duncan Wright, Melissa Marshall, Joakim Goldhahn and Inés Domingo Sanz Introduction The western Arnhem Land site of Madjedbebe – a site hitherto erroneously named Malakunanja II in scientific and popular literature but identified as Madjedbebe by senior Mirarr Traditional Owners – is widely recognised as one of Australia’s oldest dated human occupation sites (Roberts et al. 1990a:153, 1998; Allen and O’Connell 2014; Clarkson et al. 2017). Yet little is known of its extensive body of rock art. The comparative lack of interest in rock art by many archaeologists in Australia during the 1960s into the early 1990s meant that rock art was often overlooked or used simply to illustrate the ‘real’ archaeology of, for example, stone artefact studies. As Hays-Gilpen (2004:1) suggests, rock art was viewed as ‘intractable to scientific research, especially under the science-focused “new archaeology” and “processual archaeology” paradigms of the 1960s through the early 1980s’. Today, things have changed somewhat, and it is no longer essential to justify why rock art has relevance to wider archaeological studies. That said, archaeologists continued to struggle to connect the archaeological record above and below ground at sites such as Madjedbebe. For instance, at this site, Roberts et al. (1990a:153) recovered more than 1500 artefacts from the lowest occupation levels, including ‘silcrete flakes, pieces of dolerite and ground haematite, red and yellow ochres, a grindstone and a large number of amorphous artefacts made of quartzite and white quartz’. The presence of ground haematite and ochres in the lowest deposits certainly confirms the use of pigment by the early, Pleistocene inhabitants of this site. -
Rivers of Peace: Restructuring India Bangladesh Relations
C-306 Montana, Lokhandwala Complex, Andheri West Mumbai 400053, India E-mail: [email protected] Project Leaders: Sundeep Waslekar, Ilmas Futehally Project Coordinator: Anumita Raj Research Team: Sahiba Trivedi, Aneesha Kumar, Diana Philip, Esha Singh Creative Head: Preeti Rathi Motwani All rights are reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or utilised in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, without prior permission from the publisher. Copyright © Strategic Foresight Group 2013 ISBN 978-81-88262-19-9 Design and production by MadderRed Printed at Mail Order Solutions India Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai, India PREFACE At the superficial level, relations between India and Bangladesh seem to be sailing through troubled waters. The failure to sign the Teesta River Agreement is apparently the most visible example of the failure of reason in the relations between the two countries. What is apparent is often not real. Behind the cacophony of critics, the Governments of the two countries have been working diligently to establish sound foundation for constructive relationship between the two countries. There is a positive momentum. There are also difficulties, but they are surmountable. The reason why the Teesta River Agreement has not been signed is that seasonal variations reduce the flow of the river to less than 1 BCM per month during the lean season. This creates difficulties for the mainly agrarian and poor population of the northern districts of West Bengal province in India and the north-western districts of Bangladesh. There is temptation to argue for maximum allocation of the water flow to secure access to water in the lean season. -
A Call to Action: the Past and Future of Historical Archaeology
A Call to Action: The Past and Future of Historical Archaeology FINAL PROGRAM 49th Annual Conference on Historical and Underwater Archaeology January 6-9, 2016 • Washington, D.C. OMNI SHOREHAM HOTEL FLOOR PLAN LOWER LEVEL 2 B Terrace Health Veranda Empire Club To Room Parkview Rooms Robert’s ADA Elevator Private Blue Room Blue Robert’s Restaurant Dining Palladian Diplomat to Blue Room Prefunction Room Room Room Room & Parkview Building Empire Foyer Sales Conference Room Parking Lot Rest Bird Cage Walk Rooms Women’s Lounge ADA Lift to (Lower Level) Ambassador and Little Something Men’s Clothing Executive Regency Ball Rooms Capitol East Registration Gormet ADA Elevator Store Room Telephones ATM to Roberts Restaurant Committee Level 1B Room Director’s Room East and Palladian Room WEST LOBBY West Room Elevators EAST LOBBY Elevators Coat Check Stairs Embassy Room AMBASSADOR Telephones Women’s News Stand Men’s Business West BALLROOM Gift Shop MAIN LOBBY Jewelry Restroom Center Registration Lounge Store Men’s Women’s Men’s Lounge Concerge Telephones Restroom Restroom President’s Desk (Lower Level) Hampton Room Board Room Front Desk Council Regency Gallery Room Senate Room Chairman’s & Reception Board Room Room Forum Room East Congressional West Conference Calvert Conference Governors Marquee Lounge Center Room Cabinet Center Board Room Room REGENCY BALLROOM EAST LOBBY MAIN ENTRANCE Calvert Room For Access to Diplomat ballrooms Capitol Room BALLROOMS (East Lobby) ADA Ramp Chairman’s Boardroom To Lobby Please use elevators on the West Side Embassy Room Blue Room and go to level 1B. Governor’s Boardroom Blue Pre-Function Hampton Room Hampton For Access to the Empire Ballroom President’s Boardroom and Health Club/Outdoor Pool East Registration Please use elevators on the West Side BALLROOMS (West Lobby) of the Hotel and go to level 2B. -
Courage and Thoughtful Scholarship = Indigenous Archaeology Partnerships
FORUM COURAGE AND THOUGHTFUL SCHOLARSHIP = INDIGENOUS ARCHAEOLOGY PARTNERSHIPS Dale R. eroes Robert McGhee's recent lead-in American Antiquity article entitled Aboriginalism and Problems of Indigenous archaeology seems to emphasize the pitfalls that can occur in "indige nolls archaeology." Though the effort is l1ever easy, I would empha size an approach based on a 50/50 partnership between the archaeological scientist and the native people whose past we are attempting to study through our field alld research techniques. In northwestern North America, we have found this approach important in sharillg ownership of the scientist/tribal effort, and, equally important, in adding highly significant (scientif ically) cullUral knowledge ofTribal members through their ongoing cultural transmission-a concept basic to our explana tion in the field of archaeology and anthropology. Our work with ancient basketry and other wood and fiber artifacts from waterlogged Northwest Coast sites demonstrates millennia ofcultl/ral cOlltinuity, often including reg ionally distinctive, highly guarded cultural styles or techniques that tribal members continue to use. A 50/50 partnership means, and allows, joint ownership that can only expand the scientific description and the cultural explanation through an Indigenous archaeology approach. El artIculo reciente de Robert McGhee en la revista American Antiquity, titulado: Aborigenismo y los problemas de la Arque ologia Indigenista, pC/recen enfatizar las dificultades que pueden ocurrir en la "arqueologfa indigenista -
The Origins of Japanese Culture Uncovered Using DNA ―What Happens When We Cut Into the World of the Kojiki Myths Using the Latest Science
The Origins of Japanese Culture Uncovered Using DNA ―What happens when we cut into the world of the Kojiki myths using the latest science Miura Sukeyuki – Professor, Rissho University & Shinoda Kenichi – Director, Department of Anthropology, Japanese National Museum of Nature and Science MIURA Sukeyuki: The Kojiki (Records of Ancient Matters) has one distinguishing feature in the fact it includes a mixture of both Southern and Northern style myths. This is proof that Japanese culture was originally not only one culture, but rather came into existence while being influenced by its various surroundings; but when it comes to trying to seek out the origins of that culture, as we would expect, there are limits to how far we can get using only an arts and humanities-based approach. That’s where your (Professor Shinoda’s) area of expertise— molecular anthropology—comes in and corroborates things scientifically for us. Miura Sukeyuki , Professor, Rissho By analyzing the DNA remaining in ancient human skeletal remains, University your research closing in on the origins of the Japanese people is beginning to unravel when the Jomon and Yayoi peoples and so on came to the Japanese archipelago, where they came from, and the course of their movements, isn’t it? In recent times we’ve come to look forward to the possibility that, by watching the latest developments in scientific research, we may be able to newly uncover the origins of Japanese culture. SHINODA Kenichi: Speaking of the Kojiki , during my time as a student my mentor examined the bones of O-no-Yasumaro, who is regarded as being the person who compiled and edited it. -
This Study Was Held from December'2007 to Septrmber'2008
Bangladesh Journal of Environmental Research, Vol. 11, 94-110, 2020 ISSN: 1996-8914 Application of Environmental Remote Sensing for Updating Geo- Archaeological Records Mizanur Rahman1*, Md Saifuzzaman2, S. Dara Shamsuddin2 1 United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), Cox's Bazar-4700, Bangladesh 2 Department of Geography & Environment, Jahangirnagar University, Savar, Dhaka-1342, Bangladesh (Received: 20 March 2020, Revised: 25 June 2020, Accepted: 28 June 2020, Online: 30 June 2020) Abstract Documentation, conservation, and preservation of archaeological sites and artefacts in Bangladesh call for rapid non-invasive methods of scientific investigation in order not to disturb the sites and situation in a densely populated country with considerable fluvio-geomorphological changes. Remote Sensing (RS) and GIS with appropriate use of other supplementary information is an advantageous method of identification and analysis of archaeological features and environmental characteristics of archaeological sites. We had earlier proposed a five-step methodological approach to developing a geospatial database on the physical and cultural aspects of archaeological sites using RS and GIS technologies and tested in six archaeological sites of various sizes, periods, and environmental conditions. The current study is a further exploration of the proposed method in two little known archaeological sites, namely Mainamatir Garh (or Mainamatir Kot) and Dharmapaler Garh, less than 4 km apart in Domar and Jaldhaka Upazilas of Nilphamari District. The local inhabitants have encroached the sites and divided up into plots for their settlements. Consequently, the ramparts of the mud fort are threatened by massive human disturbance. It is also under threat of river erosion flowing along Mainamatir Garh. Freely available multispectral and high-spatial remote sensing data provided additional measurement capabilities of various artefacts in the sites. -
Inclusion, Collaboration & Engagement
American Anthropological Association 107th Annual Meeting November 19–23, 2008 San Francisco, California Inclusion, Collaboration & Engagement Preliminary Program 2008 PRELIMINARY PROGRAM COUNTDOWN TO SAN FRAN C IS C O 107th AAA Annual Meeting | November 19–23, 2008 | San Francisco Hilton and Towers Inclusion, Collaboration & Engagement “Graduate Student Collaborations and tional labor politics and help us delineate an ethnol- Engagements in Environmental Change ogy of labor struggles. Research,” will stress how graduate students can The newly formed Society for Anthropological NOEL J CHRISMAN collaborate on integrative research programs Sciences will sponsor its first AAA sessions, AAA EXECUTIVE PROGRAM CHAIR focused on the human dimensions of environ- which will highlight various formal methods of mental change. collecting, analyzing and visualizing data from It is time to make your final plans for the annu- The Society for the Anthropology of the field, in particular methods of cognitive al meeting, November 19-23 in San Francisco, Consciousness and the Society for Latin anthropology and social network analysis. a beautiful city with much to offer. The Annual American and Caribbean Anthropology will The Society of Lesbian and Gay Meeting Program cosponsor the invited session “Black Atlantic Anthropologists will co-sponsor, with the Committee accepted and Caribbean Religions: Transnational Flows Executive Program Committee, a session titled more than 500 sessions and Local Histories.” This session will bring “Anthropology and Transgender: Rethinking this year. As always, the together researchers documenting the histories Inclusion, Collaboration and Engagement.” annual meeting promises of specific religious communities throughout Trans and non-trans anthropologists, historians, to be a great opportunity the region.