NASA Non-Procurement Partnerships Joe Kroener Director, NASA Partnership Office What Are NASA Partnerships?

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

NASA Non-Procurement Partnerships Joe Kroener Director, NASA Partnership Office What Are NASA Partnerships? NASA Non-Procurement Partnerships Joe Kroener Director, NASA Partnership Office What are NASA Partnerships? • NASA regularly engages in a wide range of activities with a multitude of external entities; in a broad sense, all of these activities can be considered “partnerships” • Space Act Agreements (SAAs): A specific type of partnership instrument done under NASA’s “other transactions” authority under the Space Act • Other partnering authorities: üEconomy Act üCommercial Space Launch Act üFederal Technology Transfer Act ü…and more! 2 What are NASA Partnerships? NASA partnership agreements are typically one of the following types: • Reimbursable (partner reimburses NASA, in full or in part, for access to unique NASA resources); • Non-reimbursable (no exchange of funds collaborations); or • Unfunded (NASA provides resources other than funding to the partner) to help advance a technology or area of interest relevant to NASA’s missions • Partnership agreements such as SAAs are not procurement instruments; NASA does not procure goods or services for the benefit of the Agency through partnership agreements 3 NASA’s Partnership Portfolio The U.S. private sector Number of Active Agreements and % of is NASA’s largest partner Total by Partner Segment segment by # of International U.S. Federal agreements, accounting for Partners… Agencies more than a third of 755 (26%) NASA’s 2,866 active U.S. State & Local agreements. Govt. 84 (3%) U.S. Academic & U.S. Private Education Source: NASA Partnership Agreement Maker Sector 337 (12%) (PAM) system and NASA System for International 1,009 (35%) and External Relations Agreements (SIERA) database as of 9/30/2019 4 NASA Partnership Engagement: Why? • Facilitates collaborative opportunities with domestic and international partners • Helps NASA resolve gaps in technical capabilities helping us meet our mission objectives • Supports U.S. economic innovation and industrial competitiveness • Meets NASA’s mandate under the Space Act of stimulating the “fullest commercial use of space” and transferring NASA-developed technologies • Helps maintain essential NASA expertise and facilities • Facilitates NASA’s education and outreach goals 5 Partner Benefits • Access to unique NASA assets (e.g., specialized clean room, testing facilities/equipment) without incurring a large capital expenditure • Access to unique NASA technical expertise (e.g., specialized consulting and analyses), software, and licensing opportunities • Opportunity to leverage resources by co-funding technology development of mutual interest, while retaining commercial IP rights to partner-developed technologies • NASA brand recognition (Note: NASA does not endorse commercial products or services) 6 Mission Support Enables Commercial Space Partnerships: Moving the U.S. Forward to the Moon, Mars, and Beyond Marshall Space Flight Center – provides Kennedy Space Center – design, development, testing and renewed a five-year evaluation, support to Virgin Orbit for their reimbursable Commercial LauncherOne rocket program Space Launch Act (CSLA) development. agreement with SpaceX to provide access to KSC’s unique services in support of commercial launch and Johnson Space Center – provides training services to reentry operations. Axiom private astronauts using unique training facilities and associated JSC vendor partners, in support of commercial development activities including pre-flight mission planning for prospective private astronaut trainees to facilitate the commercialization of low earth orbit operations and training. Goddard Space Flight Center – NASA competitively awarded 19 collaborative provides Space Communications non-reimbursable partnership agreements to Navigation (SCaN) launch and mature industry-developed space reentry services to United Space technologies and help maintain American Alliance, LLC (ULA) for their leadership in space. NASA Centers are commercial, non-Federal partnering with small and large aerospace Launches. companies to provide expertise, hardware and software. These partnerships will advance the commercial space sector and help bring new capabilities to market that could benefit future NASA missions. The following are examples of agreements focused specifically on enabling commercial space to get to the Moon: JSC and GSFC are working with Blue Origin to mature a navigation and guidance system for safe and precise landing on the Moon; KSC is working with SpaceX to advance their technology to vertically land large rockets on the Moon. 7 KSC is partnering with Lockheed Martin to test in-space plant growth systems that could help NASA harvest plants in deep space. Mission Support Enables Commercial Space Partnerships: Moving the U.S. Forward to the Moon, Mars, and Beyond Marshall Space Flight Center – Stennis Space Center – expanded its provides long-term usage of agreements with Relativity Space Test Stand 4670, the Saturn V (RSI) to include use of an additional first stage engine test stand, to facility for the purpose of launch Blue Origin for development system manufacture and assembly. and certification testing of their BE3, BE3U, and BE4 engines. Johnson Space Center – preparing Mission Control Center facilities at JSC in advance of testing hardware, known as Crew Interface Technology Payload, which Ames Research Center – Lockheed Martin will fly on Artemis I to provides wind tunnel testing of evaluate ground to space telephony spacecraft configurations in applications using COTS devices in a deep order to obtain aerodynamic space environment. performance data of launch vehicles for commercial space capabilities. Kennedy Space Center – provides Orbital Sciences Corporation (OSC) use of High Bay 2 in the Vehicle Assembly Building (VAB) and Mobile Launcher Platform 3 (MLP-3) under a reimbursable agreement. 8 NASA Partnership Trends & Future Focus Areas • NASA Partnerships are ever-evolving and continue to diversify! • External partners and their capabilities are expanding; continuing to make breakthroughs in exploration technology and science that are pertinent to NASA’s missions • Effective partnerships will be vital for successfully accomplishing exciting NASA missions such as Artemis that will enable the first woman and next man on the Moon by 2024! NASA is committed to continuously improving and streamlining partnership processes to maximize flexibility and minimize burden for the Agency and our partners. 9 THANK YOU! Visit us at: Questions? http://www.nasa.gov/partnerships.html Joe Kroener Director, NASA Partnership Office [email protected] 10.
Recommended publications
  • Cape Canaveral Air Force Station Support to Commercial Space Launch
    The Space Congress® Proceedings 2019 (46th) Light the Fire Jun 4th, 3:30 PM Cape Canaveral Air Force Station Support to Commercial Space Launch Thomas Ste. Marie Vice Commander, 45th Space Wing Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.erau.edu/space-congress-proceedings Scholarly Commons Citation Ste. Marie, Thomas, "Cape Canaveral Air Force Station Support to Commercial Space Launch" (2019). The Space Congress® Proceedings. 31. https://commons.erau.edu/space-congress-proceedings/proceedings-2019-46th/presentations/31 This Event is brought to you for free and open access by the Conferences at Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Space Congress® Proceedings by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Cape Canaveral Air Force Station Support to Commercial Space Launch Colonel Thomas Ste. Marie Vice Commander, 45th Space Wing CCAFS Launch Customers: 2013 Complex 41: ULA Atlas V (CST-100) Complex 40: SpaceX Falcon 9 Complex 37: ULA Delta IV; Delta IV Heavy Complex 46: Space Florida, Navy* Skid Strip: NGIS Pegasus Atlantic Ocean: Navy Trident II* Black text – current programs; Blue text – in work; * – sub-orbital CCAFS Launch Customers: 2013 Complex 39B: NASA SLS Complex 41: ULA Atlas V (CST-100) Complex 40: SpaceX Falcon 9 Complex 37: ULA Delta IV; Delta IV Heavy NASA Space Launch System Launch Complex 39B February 4, 2013 Complex 46: Space Florida, Navy* Skid Strip: NGIS Pegasus Atlantic Ocean: Navy Trident II* Black text – current programs;
    [Show full text]
  • Small Satellite Launchers
    SMALL SATELLITE LAUNCHERS NewSpace Index 2020/04/20 Current status and time from development start to the first successful or planned orbital launch NEWSPACE.IM Northrop Grumman Pegasus 1990 Scorpius Space Launch Demi-Sprite ? Makeyev OKB Shtil 1998 Interorbital Systems NEPTUNE N1 ? SpaceX Falcon 1e 2008 Interstellar Technologies Zero 2021 MT Aerospace MTA, WARR, Daneo ? Rocket Lab Electron 2017 Nammo North Star 2020 CTA VLM 2020 Acrux Montenegro ? Frontier Astronautics ? ? Earth to Sky ? 2021 Zero 2 Infinity Bloostar ? CASIC / ExPace Kuaizhou-1A (Fei Tian 1) 2017 SpaceLS Prometheus-1 ? MISHAAL Aerospace M-OV ? CONAE Tronador II 2020 TLON Space Aventura I ? Rocketcrafters Intrepid-1 2020 ARCA Space Haas 2CA ? Aerojet Rocketdyne SPARK / Super Strypi 2015 Generation Orbit GoLauncher 2 ? PLD Space Miura 5 (Arion 2) 2021 Swiss Space Systems SOAR 2018 Heliaq ALV-2 ? Gilmour Space Eris-S 2021 Roketsan UFS 2023 Independence-X DNLV 2021 Beyond Earth ? ? Bagaveev Corporation Bagaveev ? Open Space Orbital Neutrino I ? LIA Aerospace Procyon 2026 JAXA SS-520-4 2017 Swedish Space Corporation Rainbow 2021 SpinLaunch ? 2022 Pipeline2Space ? ? Perigee Blue Whale 2020 Link Space New Line 1 2021 Lin Industrial Taymyr-1A ? Leaf Space Primo ? Firefly 2020 Exos Aerospace Jaguar ? Cubecab Cab-3A 2022 Celestia Aerospace Space Arrow CM ? bluShift Aerospace Red Dwarf 2022 Black Arrow Black Arrow 2 ? Tranquility Aerospace Devon Two ? Masterra Space MINSAT-2000 2021 LEO Launcher & Logistics ? ? ISRO SSLV (PSLV Light) 2020 Wagner Industries Konshu ? VSAT ? ? VALT
    [Show full text]
  • Space Coast Is Getting Busy: 6 New Rockets Coming to Cape Canaveral, KSC
    4/16/2019 Space Coast is getting busy: 6 new rockets coming to Cape Canaveral, KSC Space Coast is getting busy: 6 new rockets coming to Cape Canaveral, Kennedy Space Center Emre Kelly, Florida Today Published 4:04 p.m. ET April 11, 2019 | Updated 7:53 a.m. ET April 12, 2019 COLORADO SPRINGS, Colo. – If schedules hold, the Space Coast will live up to its name over the next two years as a half-dozen new rockets target launches from sites peppered across the Eastern Range. Company, government and military officials here at the 35th Space Symposium, an annual space conference, have reaffirmed their plans to launch rockets ranging from more traditional heavy-lift behemoths to smaller vehicles that take advantage of new manufacturing technologies. Even if some of these schedules slip, at least one thing is apparent to several spaceflight experts here: The Eastern Range is seeing an unprecedented growth in commercial space companies and efforts. Space Launch System: 2020 NASA's Space Launch System rocket launches from Kennedy Space Center's pad 39B in this rendering by the agency. (Photo: NASA) NASA's long-awaited SLS, a multibillion-dollar rocket announced in 2011, is slated to become the most powerful launch vehicle in history if it can meet a stringent late 2020 deadline. The 322-foot-tall rocket is expected to launch on its first flight – Exploration Mission 1 – from Kennedy Space Center with an uncrewed Orion capsule for a mission around the moon, which fits in with the agency's wider goal of putting humans on the surface by 2024.
    [Show full text]
  • Espinsights the Global Space Activity Monitor
    ESPInsights The Global Space Activity Monitor Issue 6 April-June 2020 CONTENTS FOCUS ..................................................................................................................... 6 The Crew Dragon mission to the ISS and the Commercial Crew Program ..................................... 6 SPACE POLICY AND PROGRAMMES .................................................................................... 7 EUROPE ................................................................................................................. 7 COVID-19 and the European space sector ....................................................................... 7 Space technologies for European defence ...................................................................... 7 ESA Earth Observation Missions ................................................................................... 8 Thales Alenia Space among HLS competitors ................................................................... 8 Advancements for the European Service Module ............................................................... 9 Airbus for the Martian Sample Fetch Rover ..................................................................... 9 New appointments in ESA, GSA and Eurospace ................................................................ 10 Italy introduces Platino, regions launch Mirror Copernicus .................................................. 10 DLR new research observatory ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Right Rocket for the Job: Small Launch Providers Target Small Satellites
    The Right Rocket for the Job: Small Launch Providers Target Small Satellites An STS Research Paper presented to the faculty of the School of Engineering and Applied Science University of Virginia by Gabriel Norris May 11, 2020 On my honor as a University student, I have neither given nor received unauthorized aid on this assignment as defined by the Honor Guidelines for Thesis-Related Assignments. Signed: _________________________________________________ Approved: _______________________________________ Date ________________________ Peter Norton, Department of Engineering and Society 2 The University of Virginia Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering has its first satellite, Libertas, now in orbit and plans to launch two more within the next three years. This sudden activity is representative of the vastly increased smallsat1 launch cadence by a variety of groups around the world. The trend is facilitated by the reduced cost and relative ease of assembly conferred by CubeSats, which collectively make up 70 percent of satellites launched today (Halt & Wieger, 2019). Startups, underdeveloped countries, and universities that, just ten years ago, would have been incapable of any kind of space mission are now launching several. From 2012 to 2019, 663 CubeSats were manufactured by private companies, nearly 300 by governments or militaries, and 371 by academic institutions. Yearly satellite launches have increased six-fold in this time (Halt & Wieger, 2019; fig. 1). This marked increase in customers underscores a sociotechnical problem in the rocketry industry: most rockets are fairly large and cater primarily to large satellites, leaving behind a large number of customers in the smallsat domain. Satellites broadly fall within four categories of use: remote sensing, communication, technology demonstration, and scientific investigation.
    [Show full text]
  • Undergraduate Thesis Prospectus Design And
    Undergraduate Thesis Prospectus Design and Construction of an Amateur Radio CubeSat (technical research project in Aerospace Engineering) The Right Rocket for the Job: Small Launch Providers Target Small Satellites (STS research project) by Gabriel Norris October 31, 2019 technical project collaborators: MAE 4690/4700 Spacecraft Design Team On my honor as a University student, I have neither given nor received unauthorized aid on this assignment as defined by the Honor Guidelines for Thesis-Related Assignments. signed: __________________________________________ date: ________________ approved: ________________________________________ date: ________________ Peter Norton, Department of Engineering and Society approved: ________________________________________ date: ________________ Christopher Goyne, Department of Aerospace Engineering 2 General Research Problem: Small Satellites in Low Earth Orbit How can we efficiently and reliably put scientific and communications equipment into orbit? The development of radio telecommunications transformed human communication. The line-of-sight propagation of most radio signals, however, kept the technology from enabling truly global communication for some time. By 1927, it was possible to bounce high-energy radio waves off the ionosphere, which enabled transcontinental radiotelephony, but at a very high cost and with poor signal quality. In October 1945, Arthur C. Clarke published an article proposing the concept of a satellite constellation for the purpose of relaying signals around the world, a full twelve years before the launch of Sputnik 1 (Clarke, 1945). In 1958, Clarke’s vision came to pass with the launch of the first communications satellite SCORE, which broadcast a Christmas greeting from President Eisenhower to the entire world (Martin, 2007). Now over 2,000 satellites orbit the Earth and the world is more interconnected than ever.
    [Show full text]
  • Systems-Theoretic Process Analysis of Space Launch Vehicles ⁎ John M
    The Journal of Space Safety Engineering xxx (xxxx) xxx–xxx Contents lists available at ScienceDirect The Journal of Space Safety Engineering journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jsse Systems-Theoretic Process Analysis of space launch vehicles ⁎ John M. Risinga, , Nancy G. Levesonb a Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA b Aeronautics and Astronautics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA ABSTRACT This article demonstrates how Systems-Theoretic Process Analysis (STPA) can be used as a powerful tool to identify, mitigate, and eliminate hazards throughout the space launch system lifecycle. Hazard analysis tech- niques commonly used to evaluate launch vehicle safety use reliability theory as their foundation, but most modern space launch vehicle accidents have resulted from design errors or other factors independent of com- ponent reliability. This article reviews safety analysis methods as they are applied to space launch vehicles, and demonstrates that they are unable to treat many of the causal factors associated with modern launch accidents. Next, it describes how STPA can be applied to the design of space launch vehicles to treat these casual factors. Safety-guided design with STPA is then demonstrated with a hypothetical small-lift launch vehicle, launch safety system, and upper stage propulsion system. 1. Introduction reliability-based tools often used to evaluate safety are unable to predict or analyze software and component interactions. Furthermore, the 1.1. Motivation growing popularity of autonomous flight termination systems (AFTS) reinforces the need for software safety analysis tools. Designers of The causal factors of launch vehicle accidents are changing. Early launch systems need hazard analysis tools that are better equipped to accidents were often caused by electromechanical component failures, handle these new causes of launch vehicle accidents.
    [Show full text]
  • Start-Up Space Report 2020
    Start-Up Space Update on Investment in Commercial Space Ventures 2020 i Bryce Space and Technology brycetech.com CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................... III INTRODUCTION. 1 Purpose and Background . 1 Methodology ...................................................1 OVERVIEW OF START-UP SPACE VENTURES. 3 TYPES OF SPACE INVESTOR ......................................4 SPACE INVESTMENT BY THE NUMBERS ...........................11 Seed Funding . 15 Venture Capital . 16 Private Equity . 17 Acquisition ...................................................18 Public Offering ................................................19 Debt Financing . 19 Investment Across All Types .....................................19 Valuation ....................................................21 Casualties ...................................................22 SPACE INVESTORS BY THE NUMBERS ............................23 Overall ......................................................23 Angels ......................................................27 Venture Capital Firms . 28 Private Equity Groups ..........................................31 Corporations . 32 Banks and Other Financial Institutions .............................33 SPECIAL TOPIC: CHINESE ACTIVITY IN START-UP SPACE VENTURES. 35 START-UP SPACE: WHAT’S NEXT?. 38 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS. 41 ii brycetech.com Bryce Space and Technology EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Three significant trends are shaping the start-up space environment as we enter the 2020s. First, investors continue to pour large amounts
    [Show full text]
  • CONTINGENCY in POSTSITUATIONIST ARCHITECTURE Phd Thesis
    UNIVERSIDAD POLITÉCNICA DE MADRID ESCUELA TÉCNICA SUPERIOR DE ARQUITECTURA DE MADRID DEPARTAMENTO DE PROYECTOS ARQUITECTÓNICOS CONTINGENCY IN POSTSITUATIONIST ARCHITECTURE PhD thesis IGNACIO PEYDRO DUCLOS Arquitecto ETSAM, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid Master of Science in Architecture Studies Massachusetts Institute of Technology January 2016 DIRECTOR: EMILIO TUÑÓN ÁLVAREZ DOCTORAL PROGRAM: Teoría y Práctica del Proyecto RD778/1998 AUTHOR: Ignacio Peydro Duclos DNI: 50320954-J TITLE: Contingency in Postsituationist Architecture DIRECTOR: Emilio Tuñón Álvarez, PhD architect PROGRAM: Theory and Practice of Architecture Design (Teoría y Práctica del Proyecto (RD778/1998)) UNIVERSITY: Universidad Politécnica de Madrid SCHOOL: Escuela Técnica Superior de Arquitectura de Madrid DEPARTMENT: Architecture Design (Proyectos Arquitectónicos) PhD Thesis committee José Ballesteros Raga (Universidad Politécnica de Madrid) Luis Rojo de Castro (Universidad Politécnica de Madrid) Antón García-Abril (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) José Vela Castillo (IE University) Juana Sánchez Gómez (Universidad de Málaga) Deputy members: Jesús Vassallo (Rice University) Santiago de Molina (Universidad San Pablo CEU) Contents Abstract 15 Methodology of the Thesis 21 Acknowledgements 25 Introduction 27 Background Time and Space before relativity 57 Geometry in Architecture Design 59 Special Theory of Relativity: 61 Contributions of the Special Theory of Relativity: 65 General Theory of Relativity: 69 Sigfried Giedion. Space, Time, Architecture. 72 CONTINGENCY
    [Show full text]
  • Tough Crowd: Small Launch Vehicles Seek Niche in Ultra-Competitive Market
    Tough crowd: Small launch vehicles seek niche in ultra-competitive market Date Posted: 13-Aug-2020 Author: Pat Host, Washington, DC Publication: Jane's International Defence Review More companies than ever are developing small launch vehicles, but must address market economics and an industry behemoth that could undercut them. Pat Host reports The small launch vehicle market, roughly defined as rockets carrying payloads of 250 kg or less, is as competitive as ever. About 100 companies are developing small rockets, and many started years ago to fulfill an expected demand for hundreds of launches per day of disaggregated low Earth orbit (LEO) satellites. This market failed to develop. Janes analysis suggests the small launch market can support two to three, maybe four companies. In addition, industry behemoth Space Exploration Technologies Corp (SpaceX), is now offering rideshare opportunities on its Falcon 9 rocket at USD5,000 per kg. An industry executive, who was given anonymity to discuss market pricing, told Janes in May that this may be 10-times cheaper than custom launches being offered by existing small launch providers. The executive said the challenge facing small rocket developers is that large vehicles, such as SpaceX’s Falcon 9, can launch 50-times as many satellites as a small vehicle, while costing only five times as much to make the rocket. Planet, a satellite imagery provider, signed contracts for multiple launches of three 115 kg spacecraft at a time on Falcon 9 as a ride share. © 2020 Jane’s Group UK Limited. No portion of this report may be reproduced, reused, or otherwise distributed in any form Page 1 of 16 without prior written consent, with the exception of any internal client distribution as may be permitted in the license agreement between client and Jane’s.
    [Show full text]
  • Espinsights the Global Space Activity Monitor
    ESPInsights The Global Space Activity Monitor Issue 5 January-March 2020 CONTENTS FOCUS ..................................................................................................................... 1 The COVID-19 pandemic crisis: the point of view of space ...................................................... 1 SPACE POLICY AND PROGRAMMES .................................................................................... 3 EUROPE ................................................................................................................. 3 Lift-off for ESA Sun-exploring spacecraft ....................................................................... 3 ESA priorities for 2020 ............................................................................................. 3 ExoMars 2022 ........................................................................................................ 3 Airbus’ Bartolomeo Platform headed toward the ISS .......................................................... 3 A European Coordination Committee for the Lunar Gateway ................................................ 4 ESA awards contract to drill and analyse lunar subsoil ........................................................ 4 EU Commission invests in space .................................................................................. 4 Galileo’s Return Link Service is operational .................................................................... 4 Quality control contract on Earth Observation data ..........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Space Portal Edgar Zapata.Pdf
    • • ABOUT ME PUBLICATIONS MORE • NASA NIAC EXTERNAL COUNCIL • [email protected] • ZAPATATALKSNASA.COM 2 • ONLY PART OF THE TOTAL COST TO NASA, DOD, GOVERNMENT (CLOSER TO “PRICE”) • OTHER PUBLIC DATA FOR PERSONNEL/GOVERNMENT AND OTHER PROGRAM/PROJECT RELATED PROCUREMENT COSTS WITH PRIOR, GETS NEAR TO “TOTAL COST” • THE BENEFIT ACROSS TIME, THE CUMULATIVE BENEFIT PRODUCED FOR THAT PRICE/COST, LONG TERM 4 • • • • • • • 5 • • • • • • • • • • • 6 Zapata 4/6/2021 The NASA Budget Education & IG, then Cross Agency Support '07 fwd NASA budget increases = ~ 1.8 % per year average 1995-2020 $24,000 Aerospace incl. R&D to '02 / Aeronautics '03 fwd Science $22,000 Space Flight Support (incl. Payload/Util., LSP, Comm., & SMA) $20,000 Cx '05 Fwd, SLS + Orion + Grd.Sys. '11 Fwd $18,000 NASA BUDGET Expl. R&D: Gateway $16,000 Purchase Power Expl. R&D: Advanced Cis-lunar/Landers, HRT, & Commercial LEO 19% Drop 1995-2021 Purchase Power $14,000 R&D (Many) & LifeSci; now Expl. R&D: AES Science Drop 1995 to 2021 = Space Tech. & Aero-Tech. Space Technology '10 Fwd $12,000 19% ISS R&D $10,000 ISS (Construction to '11, then Ops & Maint.) $8,000 Shift to (Cx/Ares I Cross-cutting Research Constellation canceled) Orion, SLS US Commercial Crew for ISS & Program Budget Begins & Ground Sys. Development $6,000 Management + LifeSci ISS Crew (Soyuz) & Cargo (US Commercial) << ISS 1st ISS Element $4,000 Development Launched Space Shuttle Production, Operations & Upgrades Begins 1985 (Russian) 1998 & Construction >> <-- Shuttle Shuttle Production, Earmarks $2,000 $Millions NASA Budget (Nominal Dollars) (Nominal Budget NASA $Millions Development Begins Operations 1972 & Upgrades Rescissions (2012a) $- 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Rescissions (2012b) Return To Flight Last Shuttle Columbia Purchase Power (PP) in 1995 $ Decision: End Shuttle post-ISS Flight 2011 Dragon/Cargo Cygnus/Cargo Dragon/Crew & Falcon 9 & Antares to ISS May 8 May 2012 Sept.
    [Show full text]