DOCSLIB.ORG

Translation Training Manual for Mother Tongue Translators

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

TRANSLATION TRAINING MANUAL FOR MOTHER TONGUE TRANSLATORS Edited and Adapted by Mark Wannemacher November 1998, Revised 2016 TRANSLATION TRAINING MANUAL FOR MOTHER TONGUE TRANSLATORS The book "Translation Training Manual for Mother Tongue Translators" was primarily adapted from the book "Translation Time" by Chris Kilham, with additional units adapted from "Handbook for Mother Tongue Translator Programs" by Jerry Allen, and "Bible Translation" by Katy Barnwell. Edited and Adapted by Mark Wannemacher This book was prepared for use by second language English speakers. November 1998, Revised 2016 Translation Training Manual for Mother Tongue Translators Table of Contents INTRODUCTION, PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT, AND BACKGROUND Introduction for Bible Translators .............................................................................................. 1 How The Bible Came To Us ...................................................................................................... 3 Planning a Mother Tongue Translation Program ..................................................................... 13 Stages of a Bible Translation Project ....................................................................................... 17 Training For A Mother Tongue Translation Program .............................................................. 21 Personnel for a Translation Project .......................................................................................... 23 Bible Translator’s Library ........................................................................................................ 29 Living and Working in Another Culture .................................................................................. 31 Written Language And Punctuation ......................................................................................... 41 An Introduction To Grammar .................................................................................................. 47 Finding And Organizing Information ...................................................................................... 59 Bible Overview and Structure .................................................................................................. 63 TRANSLATION TRAINING UNITS 1-25 Unit 1 Different Languages Arrange Words Differently ......................................................... 71 Unit 2 Different Languages Use A Different Number of Words ............................................. 75 Unit 3 A Translation Must Be Accurate, Clear and Natural .................................................... 79 Unit 4 Different Kinds of Stories ............................................................................................. 85 Unit 5 Know the Whole Story.................................................................................................. 93 Unit 6 More to Know About the Whole Story ......................................................................... 99 Unit 7 How to Translate New or Difficult Words ................................................................. 105 Unit 8 All Languages Have Similar Words, but the Exact Meanings Might be Different .... 111 Unit 9 How to Choose the Best Word for Translation ........................................................... 119 Unit 10 Putting Words Together ............................................................................................ 123 Unit 11 How to Translate More Accurately ........................................................................... 129 Unit 12 How to Identify and Translate Abstract Nouns......................................................... 137 Unit 13 Translating the Order of Events in a Story ............................................................... 143 Unit 14 How To Translate Passive Sentences ....................................................................... 149 Unit 15 Introduction to Figurative Language ......................................................................... 157 Unit 16 How to Translate Figurative Language ..................................................................... 163 Unit 17 How to Translate Idioms ........................................................................................... 169 Unit 18 Rhetorical Questions ................................................................................................. 177 Unit 19 Translating Words About Feelings and Non-Direct Language ................................. 187 Unit 20 Actions In Different Cultures Have Different Meanings .......................................... 195 Unit 21 Adding Known Information to Your Translation ..................................................... 199 Unit 22 Sentence Structure .................................................................................................... 209 Unit 23 Mainline and Supportive Information ....................................................................... 219 Unit 24 Who is the Bible Written For? .................................................................................. 227 Unit 25 Translating Different Styles of Language ................................................................. 233 APPENDICES 1-9 Appendix 1 The Steps of Translation for the First Draft of the Books of the Bible .............. 241 Appendix 2 Two Steps In Translating ................................................................................... 243 Appendix 3 Review of the Translation Process ..................................................................... 245 Appendix 4 Translation Progress Chart ................................................................................. 247 Appendix 5 How to Test the Translation ............................................................................... 249 Appendix 6 How to Use Comprehension Questions to Test Translation for Understanding 253 Appendix 7 Getting Ready for the Consultant ....................................................................... 257 Appendix 8 Reviewing Translation ....................................................................................... 259 Appendix 9 Other Helpful Information for Bible Translators ............................................... 263 Introduction For Bible Translators 1 INTRODUCTION FOR BIBLE TRANSLATORS THE LANGUAGES OF THE BIBLE A long time ago men wrote God's words on paper. They wrote in two different languages. One language is called Hebrew. This was the language of the Israelites. God spoke to them in their own language, and they wrote down what He said in their own language. The books they wrote were put together and called the Old Testament. Here is Genesis 11:1-9 in Hebrew: Later on many of the Israelites forgot their language. Once men from the place called Babylon came and fought the Israelites. They beat the Israelites and took them back to their country to work for them. At another time men from Assyria did this same thing to the Israelites again. Both times the Israelites lost their land and they had to learn the languages of the people who lived in Assyria and Babylon. Many many years later, one of the Kings named Cyrus let the Israelites go back to their land. We read about this in the book Ezra in the Bible. Most of the people did not speak Hebrew anymore, they spoke a language called Aramaic. Then later on the King of Greece, Alexander the Great, sent his armies to many countries. They came to Israel and conquered the Israelites and became rulers over them. Most of the Israelites had to learn the Greek language. Greek was a very important language at that time and many people in lots of different countries could speak Greek. By the time Jesus came to earth, the Romans were the rulers in Israel, but Greek was still the international language, like English is today. So when men wrote the New Testament, they wrote it in the Greek language. Look at how Greek is written below. This is Mark 4:37-39 in Greek. 2 WHY IS IT IMPORTANT TO TRANSLATE THE BIBLE? In the Bible we read that God's word is very important. In Psalm 119, verse 105, we read that it is like a lamp to guide us, and a light for our path. If we walk around without a lamp when it is really dark, we might lose our way or stumble or fall down. It is the same with our lives. But God's word is like a very bright light. It shows us what God is like and how we should live. Also, in 1 Peter 1:24-25a, we read: All people are like the grass. And all their strength is like the flowers of the field. The grass dies and the flowers fall. But the word of the Lord will live forever. Also in 2 Timothy 3:15-17, we read: The Scriptures are able to make you wise. And that wisdom leads to salvation through faith in Christ Jesus. All Scripture is given by God and is useful for teaching and for showing people what is wrong in their lives. It is useful for correcting faults and teaching how to live right. Using the Scriptures, the person who serves God will be ready and will have everything he needs to do every good work. The Israelite people and the people who lived after Jesus came heard God's word in their own languages. We must translate the Bible so that people today can hear God speaking to them in their own language. Then they will have the opportunity to really understand God's word and think about it for themselves. They will know what God says about being in His family. In Revelation 7:9-10 it says that in heaven we will hear people praising God in every language: Then I looked, and there was a great number of people.
Recommended publications
  • The Lexicon of Proto Oceanic the Culture and Environment of Ancestral Oceanic Society

    The Lexicon of Proto Oceanic the Culture and Environment of Ancestral Oceanic Society

    The lexicon of Proto Oceanic The culture and environment of ancestral Oceanic society 2 The physical environment Pacific Linguistics 545 Pacific Linguistics is a publisher specialising in grammars and linguistic descriptions, dictionaries and other materials on languages of the Pacific, Taiwan, the Philippines, Indonesia, East Timor, southeast and south Asia, and Australia. Pacific Linguistics, established in 1963 through an initial grant from the Hunter Douglas Fund, is associated with the Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies at The Australian National University. The authors and editors of Pacific Linguistics publications are drawn from a wide range of institutions around the world. Publications are refereed by scholars with relevant expertise, who are usually not members of the editorial board. FOUNDING EDITOR: Stephen A. Wurm EDITORIAL BOARD: John Bowden, Malcolm Ross and Darrell Tryon (Managing Editors), I Wayan Arka, David Nash, Andrew Pawley, Paul Sidwell, Jane Simpson EDITORIAL ADVISORY BOARD: Karen Adams, Arizona State University Lillian Huang, National Taiwan Normal Alexander Adelaar, University of Melbourne University Peter Austin, School of Oriental and African Bambang Kaswanti Purwo, Universitas Atma Studies Jaya Byron Bender, University of Hawai‘i Marian Klamer, Universiteit Leiden Walter Bisang, Johannes Gutenberg- Harold Koch, The Australian National Universität Mainz University Robert Blust, University of Hawai‘i Frantisek Lichtenberk, University of David Bradley, La Trobe University Auckland Lyle Campbell, University of Utah John Lynch, University of the South Pacific James Collins, Universiti Kebangsaan Patrick McConvell, Australian Institute of Malaysia Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Bernard Comrie, Max Planck Institute for Studies Evolutionary Anthropology William McGregor, Aarhus Universitet Soenjono Dardjowidjojo, Universitas Atma Ulrike Mosel, Christian-Albrechts- Jaya Universität zu Kiel Matthew Dryer, State University of New York Claire Moyse-Faurie, Centre National de la at Buffalo Recherche Scientifique Jerold A.
  • Papers on Six Languages of Papua New Guinea

    Papers on Six Languages of Papua New Guinea

    Papers on six languages of Papua New Guinea Pacific Linguistics 616 Pacific Linguistics is a publisher specialising in grammars and linguistic descriptions, dictionaries and other materials on languages of the Pacific, Taiwan, the Philippines, Indonesia, East Timor, southeast and south Asia, and Australia. Pacific Linguistics, established in 1963 through an initial grant from the Hunter Douglas Fund, is associated with the School of Culture, History and Language in the College of Asia and the Pacific at The Australian National University. The authors and editors of Pacific Linguistics publications are drawn from a wide range of institutions around the world. Publications are refereed by scholars with relevant expertise, who are usually not members of the editorial board. FOUNDING EDITOR: Stephen A. Wurm EDITORIAL BOARD: I Wayan Arka and Malcolm Ross (Managing Editors), Mark Donohue, Nicholas Evans, David Nash, Andrew Pawley, Paul Sidwell, Jane Simpson, and Darrell Tryon EDITORIAL ADVISORY BOARD: Karen Adams, Arizona State University Marian Klamer, Universiteit Leiden Alexander Adelaar, University of Melbourne Harold Koch, The Australian National Peter Austin, School of Oriental and African University Studies Frantisek Lichtenberk, University of Byron Bender, University of Hawai‘i Auckland Walter Bisang, Johannes Gutenberg- John Lynch, University of the South Pacific Universität Mainz Patrick McConvell, Australian Institute of Robert Blust, University of Hawai‘i Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander David Bradley, La Trobe University Studies Lyle Campbell, University of Utah William McGregor, Aarhus Universitet James Collins, Universiti Kebangsaan Ulrike Mosel, Christian-Albrechts- Malaysia Universität zu Kiel Bernard Comrie, Max Planck Institute for Claire Moyse-Faurie, Centre National de la Evolutionary Anthropology Recherche Scientifique Matthew Dryer, State University of New York Bernd Nothofer, Johann Wolfgang Goethe- at Buffalo Universität Frankfurt am Main Jerold A.
  • Library of Congress Subject Headings for the Pacific Islands

    Library of Congress Subject Headings for the Pacific Islands

    Library of Congress Subject Headings for the Pacific Islands First compiled by Nancy Sack and Gwen Sinclair Updated by Nancy Sack Current to January 2020 Library of Congress Subject Headings for the Pacific Islands Background An inquiry from a librarian in Micronesia about how to identify subject headings for the Pacific islands highlighted the need for a list of authorized Library of Congress subject headings that are uniquely relevant to the Pacific islands or that are important to the social, economic, or cultural life of the islands. We reasoned that compiling all of the existing subject headings would reveal the extent to which additional subjects may need to be established or updated and we wish to encourage librarians in the Pacific area to contribute new and changed subject headings through the Hawai‘i/Pacific subject headings funnel, coordinated at the University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa.. We captured headings developed for the Pacific, including those for ethnic groups, World War II battles, languages, literatures, place names, traditional religions, etc. Headings for subjects important to the politics, economy, social life, and culture of the Pacific region, such as agricultural products and cultural sites, were also included. Scope Topics related to Australia, New Zealand, and Hawai‘i would predominate in our compilation had they been included. Accordingly, we focused on the Pacific islands in Melanesia, Micronesia, and Polynesia (excluding Hawai‘i and New Zealand). Island groups in other parts of the Pacific were also excluded. References to broader or related terms having no connection with the Pacific were not included. Overview This compilation is modeled on similar publications such as Music Subject Headings: Compiled from Library of Congress Subject Headings and Library of Congress Subject Headings in Jewish Studies.
  • Nomenclature Abbreviations

    Nomenclature Abbreviations

    Abbreviations * As a prefix, indicates a proto language word /?/ glottal stop 2′ compound for 3 = 2 + 1 or rarely 1 + 1 + 1 but numeral for 4 2″ distinct numeral for 3 but 4 is a compound, usually 2 + 2, rarely 5 - 1 or 2 + 1 + 1 AN Austronesian languages BC or BCE Before Christ, that is before the Current Era taken as before the period of Christ BP Before the present CE or AD In the current era, that is after the year of the Lord (Domino/Dominum) Christ CSQ, MQ Counting System Questionnaire; Measurement Questionnaire d. dialect IMP Indigenous Mathematics Project Manus type Lean used this to refer to counting systems that used subtraction from 10 such as 7=10-3, 8=10-2, 9=10-1, often with the meaning e.g. for 7 as 3 needed to com- plete the group MC Micronesian Motu type Lean used this to refer to counting systems that used pairs such as 6=2x3, 7=2x3+1, 8=2x4, 9=2x4+1 NAN Non-Austronesian (also called Papuan) languages NCQ, CQN Noun, classifier, quantifier; classifier, quantifier, noun NQC, QCN Noun, quantifier, classifier; quantifier, classifier, noun NTM New Tribes Mission, PNG PAN Proto Austronesian PN Polynesian PNG Papua New Guinea POC Proto Oceanic QC, CQ Order of quantifier-classifier; classifier-quantifier respectively SHWNG South Halmahera West New Guinea (AN Non-Oceanic language of the Central- Eastern Malayo-Polynesian, a subgroup of Proto-Malayo-Polynesian) after Tryon (2006) SIL Summer Institute of Linguistics SOV Order of words in a sentence: Subject Object Verb SVO Order of words in a sentence: Subject Verb Object TNG Trans New Guinea Phylum Nomenclature The Australian system of numbering is used.
  • Аlexander А. KAZANKOV Center of History and Cultural Anthropology Institute for African Studies Russian Academy of Sciences Moscow E�Mail: Akazankov@Inafr.Ru

    Аlexander А. KAZANKOV Center of History and Cultural Anthropology Institute for African Studies Russian Academy of Sciences Moscow EMail: [email protected]

    Аlexander А. KAZANKOV Center of History and Cultural Anthropology Institute for African Studies Russian Academy of Sciences Moscow e-mail: [email protected] PROTO-WORLD LANGUAGE I. INTRODUCTION Originally the present paper was devoted to the comparison of the NASCA (Nostratic, Semito-Hamitic, Sino-Caucasian), Bushmen (Khoisan) and South Bahnaric (belongs to Austroasiatic philae) proto- languages. Then the additional material was added from some other language families with the aim of tentative reconstruction of the Proto- World language’ s basic word list. In this paper Proto-World language will be called Ur Lasnguage (UL). It existed around 45-40 thousand years ago. All known human languages (or language families) ultimately stem from this original language. NASCA is an abbreviation [suggested by A.V. Korotayev (Kazankov, Korotayev, 2000)] for the unit of Nostratic, Afrasian, and Sino-CA ucasian. Alternative names are Eurasian ( Starostin 1989) and Paleolithic (Orel 1995a). Evidence for the genetic relatedness of the SH, Nostr., and SC was presented by S.A.Starostin (Starostin 1989), V.Orel Orel, 1995a), and A. Kazankov (Kazankov, Korotayev, 2000). South Bahnaric is a branch of Austroasiatic and belongs, more specifically, to the Mon-Khmer linguistic family. South Bahnaric reconstructions were 1 made by Yefimov (E) on the basis of Bahnar, Stieng, Mnong, Ma and Chrau (Yefimov 1990). Austroasiatic is genetically related to Austronesian, (Reid 1980; Blust 1996) the two comprising Austric. The data will be taken from both reconstructed proto-languages of various levels and from living languages. Abbreviations and reconstruction symbols Alt. – Altaic proto-language Amerind. – Proto-Amerindian AS – Anglo-Saxon AT – Proto Austro-Thai Av.-And.
  • A Linguistic Field Guide to the Morobe Province, Papua New Guinea

    A Linguistic Field Guide to the Morobe Province, Papua New Guinea

    PACIFIC LINGUISTICS Series D - No. 57 A LINGUISTIC FIELD GUIDE TO THE MOROBE PROVINCE, PAPUA NEW GUINEA by K.A. McElhanon Department of Linguistics Research School of Pacific Studies THE AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY McElhanon, K.A. A linguistic field guide to the Morobe Province, Papua New Guinea. D-57, iv + 80 pages. Pacific Linguistics, The Australian National University, 1984. DOI:10.15144/PL-D57.cover ©1984 Pacific Linguistics and/or the author(s). Online edition licensed 2015 CC BY-SA 4.0, with permission of PL. A sealang.net/CRCL initiative. PACIF.IC LINGUISTICS is issued �hrough the Linguistic Circle of Canberra and consists of four series: SERIES A - Occasional Papers SERIES B - Monographs SERIES C - Books SERIES D - Special Publications EDITOR: S.A. Wurm ASSOCIATE EDITORS: D.C. Laycock, C.L. Voorhoeve, D.T. Tryon, T.E. Dutton EDITORIAL ADVISERS: B.W. Bender K.A. McElhanon University of Hawaii University of Texas David Bradley H.P. McKaughan La Trobe U niversi ty University of Hawaii A. Capell P. MUhlhiiusler University of Sydney Linacre College, Oxford Michael G. Clyne G.N. O'Grady Monash University University of Victoria, B.C. S.H. Elbert A.K. Pawley University of Hawaii University of Auckland K.J. Franklin K.L. Pike University of Michigan; Summer Institute of Linguistics Summer Institute of Linguistics W.W. Glover E.C. Polome Summer Institute of Linguistics University of Texas G.W. Grace Malcolm Ross University of Hawaii University of Papua New Guinea M.A.K. Halliday Gillian Sankoff University of Sydney University of Pennsylvania E. Haugen W.A.L.

  • LLO Vol.5 2013

    SIL and its contribution to Oceanic linguistics1 René van den Berg SIL International Abstract:53? %/3/ %%%5%%%/ /?/%%5 paper also discusses avenues for future research and collaboration between SIL and Key words: SIL, Oceanic linguistics, collaboration Fifty years ago Arthur Capell’s article ‘Oceanic Linguistics today’ was published (Capell '*+-//3/[5 article is still worth reading, if only to get an idea of the progress made in the intervening /%678 his article by stressing the need for recording undescribed languages, collecting vernacular oral literature, doing ‘deep analysis’ of phonemic and morphological structures, as well %/3% In many respects – and this is somewhat sobering – those needs have not much changed %/ the number of languages in the Pacific is much bigger than previously estimated, while the task of describing a single language has been expanded with the need to include full In this article I discuss and evaluate the contribution of SIL to Oceanic linguistics %;;</= >?>% means presenting a personal perspective, I have tried to be objective and have taken into 3%5 /%[5[ René van den Berg //-@/ the question: to what extent has the descriptive work of SIL been informed by the various linguistic layers of linguistic research (description, documentation, typology, formal theory)? Also, to what extent can the work of SIL be expected to integrate with the work %D;E5 /=+ /J3% Although most linguists working in Oceanic languages have heard about SIL or have /3//% 3 /[/ % ・ International: members come from a variety

  • Mapos Buang Dictionary Page 1

    Mapos Buang Dictionary Page 1 NOTE: 'This is work in progress being made available for the use of anyone interested. I am continuing to work on this dictionary, and anticipate making updated versions available from time to time. Bruce Hooley, April 27, 2006. INTRODUCTION Bruce A. Hooley Central Buang is an Austronesian language spoken in the central part of the Snake River Valley in the Mumeng sub-Province, Morobe Province, Papua New Guinea. The term Buang is not a local one, although it is generally accepted by them. Bu is the Busama word for water or river, and the Ang is a stream which flows into the ocean on the coastal side of the range. It was along this stream that the Buangs used to travel to reach the coast if they ventured that far afield in pre-contact days. The other term used by coastal people for the Buangs was Kaidemoe, which sometimes appears in the literature as Gaidemoe. This was a somewhat derogatory term akin to 'bush kanaka'. The Buang language family is a close-knit group of four major and two minor languages ranging from Buasi on the coast to Piu in the middle Watut. There are three major groups in the Snake River valley, the headwaters, the central villages, and the Mangga Buang. These three parts correspond to linguistic divisions also—the first two being considered dialects, and the third a distinct language. For further details of the linguistic situation in the area see Hooley (1970). The data recorded in this dictionary is based principally on the speech of Mapos I and the nearby villages.
  • Supplementary Module 2.4 Language Ecology an Introduction to The

    Supplementary Module 2.4 Language Ecology an Introduction to The

    Language Strand Unit 2: The Nature of Language Supplementary Module 2.4 Language Ecology An Introduction to the Ecology of PNG Community Languages Student Support Material LA 2.4 Language Ecology ii Acknowledgements Materials written and compiled by Dr Steve Pickford in consultation with Elizabeth Topa, Holy Trinity PTC, Ben Tamengit, Gaulim PTC and George Kinavai, Madang PTC. Layout and diagrams supported by Nick Lauer. Date: 4 August 2003 PASTEP Primary and Secondary Teacher Education Project Australian Agency for International Development (AusAID) GRM International Papua New Guinea-Australia Development Cooperation Program Additional Student Support Material LA 2.4 Language Ecology iii Unit outline Unit # Modules 1 Language Families (Core) Unit 2 2 Spoken and Written Language (Core) The Nature of Language 3 Language Structure (Core) 4 Language Ecology (Optional) Icons Read or research Write or summarise Activity or discussion Additional Student Support Material LA 2.4 Language Ecology iv Contents Part A: An Introduction to the Ecology of PNG Community Languages Introduction: Language Ecology………………………………………………….….1 Reading 1: Vanishing voices – the ecology of language …………………………5 Languages as Memories…………………………………………………………....13 Language as Identities……………………………………………………………....14 Language Ecology and the impact of literacy………………………………….….16 Selecting and encoding a language ……………………………………………….17 Problems of standardisation……………………………………………………...…17 Language Shift……………………………………………………………………….18 Types of Languages……………………………………………………………...….19 Why is it important?………………………………………………………………….21 Appendix 1: Languages of Papua New Guinea List ……………………………..22 Additional Student Support Material LA 2.4 Language Ecology 1 Part A: An Introduction to the Ecology of PNG Community Languages Prerequisites An Introduction to the Ecology of PNG Community Languages (3.3a) is the first of two modules on the topic of Language at Home and at School, within Unit 3: Language as Social Practice.
  • Nukna Grammar Sketch

    Nukna Grammar Sketch

    Data Papers on Papua New Guinea Languages Volume 61 Nukna Grammar Sketch Matthew A. Taylor 2015 SIL-PNG Academic Publications Ukarumpa, Papua New Guinea Papers in the series Data Papers on Papua New Guinea Languages express the authors’ knowledge at the time of writing. They normally do not provide a comprehensive treatment of the topic and may contain analyses which will be modified at a later stage. However, given the large number of undescribed languages in Papua New Guinea, SIL-PNG feels that it is appropriate to make these research results available at this time. René van den Berg, Series Editor Copyright © 2015 SIL-PNG Papua New Guinea [email protected] Published 2015 Printed by SIL Printing Press Ukarumpa, Eastern Highlands Province Papua New Guinea ISBN 9980 0 3990 6 Table of Contents List of maps and tables .............................................................................ix Abbreviations .......................................................................................... xii Acknowledge ments ................................................................................ xiii 1. Introduction.........................................................................................1 1.1 Location and population ................................................................. 1 1.2 Language name.............................................................................. 2 1.3 Classification and earlier studies ..................................................... 2 1.4 Dialects ........................................................................................
  • Missing Languages

    Missing Languages

    Country Official Name Language Afghanistan Islamic Republic of Afghanistan Aimaq Afghanistan Islamic Republic of Afghanistan Ashkun Afghanistan Islamic Republic of Afghanistan Brahui Afghanistan Islamic Republic of Afghanistan Dari Persian Afghanistan Islamic Republic of Afghanistan Darwazi Afghanistan Islamic Republic of Afghanistan Domari Afghanistan Islamic Republic of Afghanistan Eastern Farsi Afghanistan Islamic Republic of Afghanistan Gawar-Bati Afghanistan Islamic Republic of Afghanistan Grangali Afghanistan Islamic Republic of Afghanistan Gujari Afghanistan Islamic Republic of Afghanistan Hazaragi Afghanistan Islamic Republic of Afghanistan Jakati Afghanistan Islamic Republic of Afghanistan Kamviri Afghanistan Islamic Republic of Afghanistan Karakalpak Afghanistan Islamic Republic of Afghanistan Kati Afghanistan Islamic Republic of Afghanistan Kazakh Afghanistan Islamic Republic of Afghanistan Kirghiz Afghanistan Islamic Republic of Afghanistan Malakhel Afghanistan Islamic Republic of Afghanistan Mogholi Afghanistan Islamic Republic of Afghanistan Munji Afghanistan Islamic Republic of Afghanistan Northeast Pashayi Afghanistan Islamic Republic of Afghanistan Northern Pashto Afghanistan Islamic Republic of Afghanistan Northwest Pashayi Afghanistan Islamic Republic of Afghanistan Ormuri Afghanistan Islamic Republic of Afghanistan Pahlavani Afghanistan Islamic Republic of Afghanistan Parachi Afghanistan Islamic Republic of Afghanistan Parya Afghanistan Islamic Republic of Afghanistan Prasuni Afghanistan Islamic Republic of Afghanistan
  • Some Principles on the Use of Macro-Areas in Typological Comparison

    Some Principles on the Use of Macro-Areas in Typological Comparison

    Language Dynamics and Change 4 (2014) 167–187 brill.com/ldc Some Principles on the Use of Macro-Areas in Typological Comparison Harald Hammarström Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics & Centre for Language Studies, Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen, The Netherlands [email protected] Mark Donohue Department of Linguistics, Australian National University, Australia [email protected] Abstract While the notion of the ‘area’ or ‘Sprachbund’ has a long history in linguistics, with geographically-defined regions frequently cited as a useful means to explain typolog- ical distributions, the problem of delimiting areas has not been well addressed. Lists of general-purpose, largely independent ‘macro-areas’ (typically continent size) have been proposed as a step to rule out contact as an explanation for various large-scale linguistic phenomena. This squib points out some problems in some of the currently widely-used predetermined areas, those found in the World Atlas of Language Struc- tures (Haspelmath et al., 2005). Instead, we propose a principled division of the world’s landmasses into six macro-areas that arguably have better geographical independence properties. Keywords areality – macro-areas – typology – linguistic area 1 Areas and Areality The investigation of language according to area has a long tradition (dating to at least as early as Hervás y Panduro, 1971 [1799], who draws few historical © koninklijke brill nv, leiden, 2014 | doi: 10.1163/22105832-00401001 168 hammarström and donohue conclusions, or Kopitar, 1829, who is more interested in historical inference), and is increasingly seen as just as relevant for understanding a language’s history as the investigation of its line of descent, as revealed through the application of the comparative method.