DOCSLIB.ORG

Draft Tokai Cecilia MF Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

DRAFT FOR COMMENT TOKAI/CECILIA Management Framework Prepared for SANParks Table Mountain National Park By: GEOSTRATICS CC TMNP-003-01 18 October 2006 Tokai Cecilia Management Framework: i TABLE OF CONTENTS C HAPTER 1:BACKGROUND .............................................................................................. 1 1 .1Brief history .................................................................................................................. 1 1 .2Process and purpose of this report .............................................................................. 1 1 .3Background information ............................................................................................... 2 C HAPTER 2:THE VISION ................................................................................................... 3 2 .1The approach ............................................................................................................... 3 2 .2The vision statement .................................................................................................... 3 C HAPTER 3:Objectives ...................................................................................................... 5 3 .1Biodiversity .................................................................................................................. 5 3 .2Heritage ....................................................................................................................... 6 3 .3Recreational Activities .................................................................................................. 7 3 .4Ecotourism Development ............................................................................................. 8 3 .5Management and monitoring ....................................................................................... 9 C HAPTER 4:STRATEGIES, ACTIONS AND TIMEFRAME .............................................. 1 0 4 .1Biodiversity ................................................................................................................ 1 0 4 .2Heritage ..................................................................................................................... 1 8 4 .3Recreational Activities ................................................................................................ 2 2 4 .4Ecotourism development ........................................................................................... 2 6 4 .4.1Tokai ................................................................................................................... 2 8 4 .4.1.1Tokai Manor Precinct: ................................................................................... 3 0 4 .4.2Cecilia ................................................................................................................. 3 1 4 .5Management and monitoring ..................................................................................... 3 2 4 .5.1Visitor surveys: .................................................................................................... 3 2 4 .5.2Monitoring and auditing ...................................................................................... 3 2 4 .5.3Partnerships ........................................................................................................ 3 2 4 .5.4Research and Research Centre .......................................................................... 3 2 4 .5.5Public communication ......................................................................................... 3 2 4 .5.6Visitor safety ........................................................................................................ 3 2 4 .5.7Clean-up of site ................................................................................................... 3 3 C HAPTER 5:SPATIAL PROPOSALS ............................................................................... 3 4 Prepared by Geostratics CC Draft for Public comment: 18 October 2006 Comments close 18 November 2006 Tokai Cecilia Management Framework: ii 5 .1CDF zoning ................................................................................................................ 3 4 5 .2Landscape ................................................................................................................. 3 4 5 .2.1Tokai Landscape Proposals ................................................................................ 3 4 5 .2.2Cecilia Landscape proposals .............................................................................. 3 5 5 .3Recreational Activities ................................................................................................ 3 6 5 .3.1Tokai recreational activities ................................................................................. 3 6 5 .3.2Cecilia Recreational areas .................................................................................. 3 6 5 .4Access alternatives for Tokai ..................................................................................... 3 7 Prepared by Geostratics CC Draft for Public comment: 18 October 2006 Comments close 18 November 2006 Tokai Cecilia Management Framework: iii Figure 1a -d Tokai: Broad landscape proposals 2 Tokai: Recreational-use areas 3 Tokai: CDF zoning 4 Tokai: Visitor site concept 5 Tokai Alternatives access routes 6a-d Cecilia: Broad landscape proposals 7 Cecilia: Recreational-use areas 8 Cecilia: CDF zoning TABLES 1 Tokai infrastructure and facilities 2 Tokai Manor Precinct 3 Cecilia infrastructure and facilities ANNEXURE REPORT Annexure A: Heritage assessment Annexure B: Guidelines for Sandplain fynbos rehabilitation and species lists Annexure C: History of forestry : Tokai and Cecilia plantations Annexure D: Guidelines for replanting of trees and New picnic area tree list Annexure E: Guidelines for Recreational Activities Annexure F: Guidelines for Rehabilitation of freshwater systems Prepared by Geostratics CC Draft for Public comment: 18 October 2006 Comments close 18 November 2006 Tokai Cecilia Management Framework: iv GLOSSARY OF ABBREVIATIONS CARA: Conservation of Agricultural Resources Act CCT: City of Cape Town CDF: Conservation Development Framework CMP: Conservation Management Plan CPNP: Cape Peninsula National Park CPPNE: Cape Peninsula Protected Natural Environment DWAF: Department of Water Affairs and Forestry EPWP: Extended Public Works Programme EMP: Environment Management Plan IEMS: Integrated Environmental Management System MTO: Mountain to Ocean Pty (Ltd) NSBA: National Spatial Biodiversity Assessment PAWC: Provincial Administration: Western Cape SANBI: South African National Botanical Institute SANParks: South African National Parks TMNP: Table Mountain National Park Prepared by Geostratics CC Draft for Public comment: 18 October 2006 Comments close 18 November 2006 Tokai Cecilia Management Framework: v Structure of report This report represents the draft proposal for the future management of Tokai and Cecilia as an integral part of the Table Mountain National Park. It formulates the vision for Tokai and Cecilia and then focuses on the finer detail of management actions. The report is accompanied by plans indicating the spatial implications and proposals set out in the vision. Chapter 1: Background The background to compiling a Management Framework is briefly explained in this chapter. It further outlines the process of compiling this report and provides a summary of information presented in the Base Information Report. Chapter 2: The vision The proposed overall vision for Tokai and Cecilia is aligned to the Park Management Plan and CDF proposals and refined into broad themes for biodiversity, heritage, ecotourism development, recreational activities and management. Chapter 3: Objectives This chapter developes the themes into more detailed objectives as a means to guide the following chapter dealing with detailed management strategies.. For each theme a broad description of the issues, informing that specific theme, is provided as a basis for formulating specific objectives. Chapter 4: Strategies, actions and time frame The detailed actions and their scheduling to achieve the objectives of chapter 3 are set out in this chapter. The intention is to guide management and link the Management Framework to SANParks’ operational and financial management systems in five-yearly phases. Both strategic and landscape proposals are thus made for the first five year period up to 2010 and then four further 5-year phases namely 2011 to 2015; 2016 -2020 and 2021 to 2025 to reflect the 20 year vision. The intention is for this chapter to be updated on an annual to 5-year basis to monitor progress. Chapter 5: Spatial Proposals The purpose of this section is to explain the spatial configuration of the management framework, i.e. the spatial vision and future use of areas. The previous sections refer to the figures in these sections and should thus be read as an integral part of the previous sections. The landscape plan for each phase illustrates the landscape and spatial use implications for that specific period. The 20-year vision is illustrated in the final phase i.e. the 2025 plan for Tokai and for Ceclia. The CDF zoning indicates the proposed broad use zones which would guide future management and development decisions. Prepared by Geostratics CC Draft for Public comment: 18 October 2006 Comments close 18 November 2006 Tokai Cecilia Management Framework: vi Annexure Report The annexure report provides useful information gathered through
Recommended publications
  • Summary of Offerings in the PBS Bulb Exchange, Dec 2012- Nov 2019

    Summary of Offerings in the PBS Bulb Exchange, Dec 2012- Nov 2019

    Summary of offerings in the PBS Bulb Exchange, Dec 2012- Nov 2019 3841 Number of items in BX 301 thru BX 463 1815 Number of unique text strings used as taxa 990 Taxa offered as bulbs 1056 Taxa offered as seeds 308 Number of genera This does not include the SXs. Top 20 Most Oft Listed: BULBS Times listed SEEDS Times listed Oxalis obtusa 53 Zephyranthes primulina 20 Oxalis flava 36 Rhodophiala bifida 14 Oxalis hirta 25 Habranthus tubispathus 13 Oxalis bowiei 22 Moraea villosa 13 Ferraria crispa 20 Veltheimia bracteata 13 Oxalis sp. 20 Clivia miniata 12 Oxalis purpurea 18 Zephyranthes drummondii 12 Lachenalia mutabilis 17 Zephyranthes reginae 11 Moraea sp. 17 Amaryllis belladonna 10 Amaryllis belladonna 14 Calochortus venustus 10 Oxalis luteola 14 Zephyranthes fosteri 10 Albuca sp. 13 Calochortus luteus 9 Moraea villosa 13 Crinum bulbispermum 9 Oxalis caprina 13 Habranthus robustus 9 Oxalis imbricata 12 Haemanthus albiflos 9 Oxalis namaquana 12 Nerine bowdenii 9 Oxalis engleriana 11 Cyclamen graecum 8 Oxalis melanosticta 'Ken Aslet'11 Fritillaria affinis 8 Moraea ciliata 10 Habranthus brachyandrus 8 Oxalis commutata 10 Zephyranthes 'Pink Beauty' 8 Summary of offerings in the PBS Bulb Exchange, Dec 2012- Nov 2019 Most taxa specify to species level. 34 taxa were listed as Genus sp. for bulbs 23 taxa were listed as Genus sp. for seeds 141 taxa were listed with quoted 'Variety' Top 20 Most often listed Genera BULBS SEEDS Genus N items BXs Genus N items BXs Oxalis 450 64 Zephyranthes 202 35 Lachenalia 125 47 Calochortus 94 15 Moraea 99 31 Moraea
  • R Conradie Orcid.Org 0000-0002-8653-4702

    R Conradie Orcid.Org 0000-0002-8653-4702

    Influence of the invasive fish, Gambusia affinis, on amphibians in the Western Cape R Conradie orcid.org 0000-0002-8653-4702 Dissertation submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree Master of Science in Zoology at the North-West University Supervisor: Prof LH du Preez Co-supervisor: Prof AE Channing Graduation May 2018 23927399 “The whole land is made desolate, but no man lays it to heart.” JEREMIAH 12:11 i DECLARATION I, Roxanne Conradie, declare that this dissertation is my own, unaided work, except where otherwise acknowledged. It is being submitted for the degree of M.Sc. to the North-West University, Potchefstroom. It has not been submitted for any degree or examination at any other university. ____________________ (Roxanne Conradie) ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to express my gratitude to the following persons and organisations, without whose assistance this study would not have been possible: My supervisor Prof. Louis du Preez and co-supervisor Prof. Alan Channing, for guidance, advice, support, and encouragement throughout the duration of this study. Prof Louis, your passion for the biological sciences has been an inspiration to me since undergraduate Zoology classes five years ago. Prof Alan, you were a vital pillar of support for me in the Cape and I am incredibly grateful towards you. Thank you both for all the time and effort you have put into helping me with my work, for all your honest and detailed advice, as well as practical help. It is truly a privilege to have had such outstanding biologists as my mentors. My husband Louis Conradie, for offering up so many weekends in order to help me with fieldwork.
  • (March 2021) Southern District Spatial Development Framework Page No. I

    (March 2021) Southern District Spatial Development Framework Page No. I

    Draft 1 (March 2021) Southern District Spatial Development Framework Page No. i PREFACE WITH INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMMENTING ON THIS DOCUMENT 1. You are requested to comment on this document that contains the Integrated Spatial Development Framework (SDF) and Environmental Management Framework (EMF) for the SOUTHERN PLANNING DISTRICT. 2. The Integrated SDF and EMF suite of documents comprise the following: a. Volume I: Baseline and Analysis Report b. Volume II: Integrated District SDF and EMF (containing the vision and spatial guidelines) c. Volume III: Implementation Plan (containing the prioritisation framework; projects and proposals for spatial restructuring and upgrading) d. Volume IV: Annexures 3. Also included for comment in the Integrated District SDF and EMF, in the Annexures, are the proposals in accordance with the National Environmental Management Act, Act 107 of 1998 (NEMA) for the: a. The proposed Exclusions from the Trigger Activities listed in section 24 of NEMA for the Southern district and other designated areas; b. The proposed Exclusions Instrument to manage the environmental processes related to the proposed Exclusions; and c. The delineation of the Urban Areas. 4. You are invited, prior to working your way through the documentation, to consult the supporting summary introductory and background material in the form of summary presentations and videos. 5. You may comment from 6 April 2021 to 6 June 2021. Any comments received after the specified 60-day period may be ignored. 6. Comments and queries, preferably via e-mail, given our need to comply with Covid-19 protocols, may be forwarded to: a. [email protected] b.
  • Download Passv146.Pdf

    Download Passv146.Pdf

    EM AD IA C S A C I A E SCRIPTA VARIA 146 I N C T I I F A I R T V N M O P Edited by JOACHIM VON BRAUN, THOMAS KAUFFELS, PETER RAVEN, JOHANNES VOGEL, MARCELO SÁNCHEZ SORONDO SCIENCE AND ACTIONS SCIENCE AND ACTIONS FOR SPECIES PROTECTION ACTIONS AND SCIENCE FOR SPECIES PROTECTION Noah’s Arks for the 21st Century Noah’s Arks for the 21st Century the 21st for Arks Noah’s Libreria Editrice Vaticana Vatican City 2020 Science and Actions for Species Protection. Noah’s Arks for the 21st Century Pontificiae Academiae Scientiarvm Scripta Varia 146 The Proceedings of the Conference on Science and Actions for Species Protection. Noah’s Arks for the 21st Century 13-14 May 2019 Edited by Joachim von Braun Thomas Kauffels Peter Raven Johannes Vogel Marcelo Sánchez Sorondo EX AEDIBVS ACADEMICIS IN CIVITATE VATICANA • MMXX The Pontifical Academy of Sciences Casina Pio IV, 00120 Vatican City Tel: +39 0669883195 • Fax: +39 0669885218 Email: [email protected] • Website: www.pas.va The opinions expressed with absolute freedom during the presentation of the papers of this meeting, although published by the Academy, represent only the points of view of the participants and not those of the Academy. ISBN 978-88-7761-098-0 © Copyright 2020 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form, or by any means, electronic, mechanical, recording, pho- tocopying or otherwise without the expressed written permission of the publisher. PONTIFICIA ACADEMIA SCIENTIARVM LIBRERIA EDITRICE VATICANA VATICAN CITY “The earth’s resources are also being plundered because of short-sighted approaches to the economy, commerce and pro- duction.
  • Lenka Kočková

    Lenka Kočková

    MASARYKOVA UNIVERZITA PŘÍRODOVĚDECKÁ FAKULTA ÚSTAV BOTANIKY A ZOOLOGIE Velikost genomu a poměr bazí v genomu v čeledi Ranunculaceae Diplomová práce Lenka Kočková Vedoucí práce: Doc. RNDr. Petr Bureš, Ph. D. Brno 2012 Bibliografický záznam Autor: Bc. Lenka Kočková Přírodovědecká fakulta, Masarykova univerzita, Ústav botaniky a zoologie Název práce: Velikost genomu a poměr bazí v genomu v čeledi Ranunculaceae Studijní program: Biologie Studijní obor: Systematická biologie a ekologie (Botanika) Vedoucí práce: Doc. RNDr. Petr Bureš, Ph. D. Akademický rok: 2011/2012 Počet stran: 104 Klíčová slova: Ranunculaceae, průtoková cytometrie, PI/DAPI, DNA obsah, velikost genomu, GC obsah, zastoupení bazí, velikost průduchů, Pignattiho indikační hodnoty Bibliographic Entry Author: Bc. Lenka Kočková Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Department of Botany and Zoology Title of Thesis: Genome size and genomic base composition in Ranunculaceae Programme: Biology Field of Study: Systematic Biology and Ecology (Botany) Supervisor: Doc. RNDr. Petr Bureš, Ph. D. Academic Year: 2011/2012 Number of Pages: 104 Keywords: Ranunculaceae, flow cytometry, PI/DAPI, DNA content, genome size, GC content, base composition, stomatal size, Pignatti‘s indicator values Abstrakt Pomocí průtokové cytometrie byla změřena velikost genomu a AT/GC genomový poměr u 135 druhů z čeledi Ranunculaceae. U druhů byla naměřena délka a šířka průduchů a z literatury byly získány údaje o počtu chromozomů a ekologii druhů. Velikost genomu se v rámci čeledi liší 63-krát. Nejmenší genom byl naměřen u Aquilegia canadensis (2C = 0,75 pg), největší u Ranunculus lingua (2C = 47,93 pg). Mezi dvěma hlavními podčeleděmi Ranunculoideae a Thalictroideae je ve velikosti genomu markantní rozdíl (2C = 2,48 – 47,94 pg a 0,75 – 4,04 pg).
  • South Africa) Over a Two-Year Period

    South Africa) Over a Two-Year Period

    Retrospective analysis of blunt force trauma associated with fatal road traffic accidents in Cape Town (South Africa) over a two-year period. by T. A Tiffany Majero (MJRTIN002) Town SUBMITTED TO THE UNIVERSITYCape OF CAPE TOWN In partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of MPhil (Biomedical Forensic Science) Faculty of Health Sciences UNIVERSITY OF CAPE TOWN University November 2017 Supervisors: Calvin Mole Department of Pathology Division of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology University of Cape Town The copyright of this thesis vests in the author. No quotation from it or information derived from it is to be published without full acknowledgementTown of the source. The thesis is to be used for private study or non- commercial research purposes only. Cape Published by the University ofof Cape Town (UCT) in terms of the non-exclusive license granted to UCT by the author. University TURNIT IN REPORT ii | P a g e DECLARATION I, T. A. Tiffany Majero, hereby declare that the work on which this dissertation/thesis is based is my original work (except where acknowledgements indicate otherwise) and that neither the whole work nor any part of it has been, is being, or is to be submitted for another degree in this or any other university. I empower the university to reproduce for the purpose of research either the whole or any portion of the contents in any manner whatsoever. Signature : Date : February 2018 iii | P a g e ABSTRACT Road transportation systems are a global developmental achievement. However, with them comes increased morbidity and mortality rates in the form of road traffic accidents.
  • TC MF Working Document

    TC MF Working Document

    Tokai Cecilia Management Framework: 1 INTRODUCTION . .2 1.1 Management ...................................................................... .2 1.2 Alien plant control . .2 1.3 Preparation after harvesting . .3 1.4 Fire management . .3 1.5 Restoration in terrestrial areas .................................................................................................... 5 1.6 Restoration in wetland and riparian areas ........................................................................... .6 1.7 Long-term planning for a restored vegetation network in Tokai . .7 1.8 Replanting . .8 TABLE 1. LIST OF INAPPROPRIATE ALIEN SPECIES AND SUGGESTED METHODS O F CONTROL. .9 TABLE 2. LIST OF LOCAL INDIGENOUS HIGHER PLANT SPECIES FOR TERRESTRIAL (SANDPLAIN & FOOTHILL) AND WETLAND/ RIPARIAN HABITATS IN T HE TOKAI AREA. .1 1 1 Tokai Cecilia Management Framework: 1 Introduction The following guidelines are applicable to restoration and rehabilitation initiatives of the sand-plain Fynbos in the lower Tokai area. The guidelines are based on: 1) Dr. Patricia M. Holmes, 2003. Management and Restoration Plan for an Area of Tokai Plantation East of Orpen Road and between the Two Car Park Areas. 2) Dr. Patricia M. Holmes, 2004. Management Plan for the Extension of the Core Cape Flats Flora Conservation Site in the Lower Tokai Forest. 3) De Villiers et al, 2005. Ecosystem Guidelines for Environmental Assessment in the Western Cape, 4) Forestry Industry Environmental Committee, 2002. Environmental Guidelines for Commercial Forestry Plantations in South Africa. 5) Conservation of Agricultural Resources Act (Act No. 43 of 1983). 6) National Water Act (Act No. 36 of 1998). 1.1 Management It should be appreciated that restoration is a process that does not happen in one step, but rather in several steps of recovery along a course of natural repair, with occasional interventions being required to redirect this trajectory along the desired path.
  • The Youth Book. a Directory of South African Youth Organisations, Service Providers and Resource Material

    The Youth Book. a Directory of South African Youth Organisations, Service Providers and Resource Material

    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 432 485 SO 029 682 AUTHOR Barnard, David, Ed. TITLE The Youth Book. A Directory of South African Youth Organisations, Service Providers and Resource Material. INSTITUTION Human Sciences Research Council, Pretoria (South Africa). ISBN ISBN-0-7969-1824-4 PUB DATE 1997-04-00 NOTE 455p. AVAILABLE FROM Programme for Development Research, Human Sciences Research Council, P 0 Box 32410, 2017 Braamfontein, South Africa; Tel: 011-482-6150; Fax: 011-482-4739. PUB TYPE Reference Materials - Directories/Catalogs (132) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC19 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Developing Nations; Educational Resources; Foreign Countries; Schools; Service Learning; *Youth; *Youth Agencies; *Youth Programs IDENTIFIERS Service Providers; *South Africa; Youth Service ABSTRACT With the goal of enhancing cooperation and interaction among youth, youth organizations, and other service providers to the youth sector, this directory aims to give youth, as well as people and organizations involved and interested in youth-related issues, a comprehensive source of information on South African youth organizations and related relevant issues. The directory is divided into three main parts. The first part, which is the background, is introductory comments by President Nelson Mandela and other officials. The second part consists of three directory sections, namely South African youth and children's organizations, South African educational institutions, including technical training colleges, technikons and universities, and South African and international youth organizations. The section on South African youth and children's organizations, the largest section, consists of 44 sectoral chapters, with each organization listed in a sectoral chapter representing its primary activity focus. Each organization is at the same time also cross-referenced with other relevant sectoral chapters, indicated by keywords at the bottom of an entry.
  • The Naturalized Vascular Plants of Western Australia 1

    The Naturalized Vascular Plants of Western Australia 1

    12 Plant Protection Quarterly Vol.19(1) 2004 Distribution in IBRA Regions Western Australia is divided into 26 The naturalized vascular plants of Western Australia natural regions (Figure 1) that are used for 1: Checklist, environmental weeds and distribution in bioregional planning. Weeds are unevenly distributed in these regions, generally IBRA regions those with the greatest amount of land disturbance and population have the high- Greg Keighery and Vanda Longman, Department of Conservation and Land est number of weeds (Table 4). For exam- Management, WA Wildlife Research Centre, PO Box 51, Wanneroo, Western ple in the tropical Kimberley, VB, which Australia 6946, Australia. contains the Ord irrigation area, the major cropping area, has the greatest number of weeds. However, the ‘weediest regions’ are the Swan Coastal Plain (801) and the Abstract naturalized, but are no longer considered adjacent Jarrah Forest (705) which contain There are 1233 naturalized vascular plant naturalized and those taxa recorded as the capital Perth, several other large towns taxa recorded for Western Australia, com- garden escapes. and most of the intensive horticulture of posed of 12 Ferns, 15 Gymnosperms, 345 A second paper will rank the impor- the State. Monocotyledons and 861 Dicotyledons. tance of environmental weeds in each Most of the desert has low numbers of Of these, 677 taxa (55%) are environmen- IBRA region. weeds, ranging from five recorded for the tal weeds, recorded from natural bush- Gibson Desert to 135 for the Carnarvon land areas. Another 94 taxa are listed as Results (containing the horticultural centre of semi-naturalized garden escapes. Most Total naturalized flora Carnarvon).
  • Technical Report Series No. 287 Advisory List of Environmental Weeds in Victoria

    Technical Report Series No. 287 Advisory List of Environmental Weeds in Victoria

    Advisory list of environmental weeds in Victoria M. White, D. Cheal, G.W. Carr, R. Adair, K. Blood and D. Meagher April 2018 Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research Technical Report Series No. 287 Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning PO Box 137 Heidelberg, Victoria 3084 Phone (03) 9450 8600 Website: www.ari.vic.gov.au Citation: White, M., Cheal, D., Carr, G. W., Adair, R., Blood, K. and Meagher, D. (2018). Advisory list of environmental weeds in Victoria. Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research Technical Report Series No. 287. Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning, Heidelberg, Victoria. Front cover photo: Ixia species such as I. maculata (Yellow Ixia) have escaped from gardens and are spreading in natural areas. (Photo: Kate Blood) © The State of Victoria Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning 2018 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia licence. You are free to re-use the work under that licence, on the condition that you credit the State of Victoria as author. The licence does not apply to any images, photographs or branding, including the Victorian Coat of Arms, the Victorian Government logo, the Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning logo and the Arthur Rylah Institute logo. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au/deed.en Printed by Melbourne Polytechnic, Preston Victoria ISSN 1835-3827 (print) ISSN 1835-3835 (pdf)) ISBN 978-1-76077-000-6 (print) ISBN 978-1-76077-001-3 (pdf/online) Disclaimer This publication may be of assistance to you but the State of Victoria and its employees do not guarantee that the publication is without flaw of any kind or is wholly appropriate for your particular purposes and therefore disclaims all liability for any error, loss or other consequence which may arise from you relying on any information in this publication.
  • Vegetation Flora and Black Cockatoo Assessment.Pdf

    Vegetation Flora and Black Cockatoo Assessment.Pdf

    Perth Children’s Hospital Pedestrian Bridge Vegetation, Flora and Black cockatoo Assessment Prepared for Main Roads WA March 2020 PCH Pedestrian Bridge Vegetation, Flora and Black-cockatoo Assessment © Biota Environmental Sciences Pty Ltd 2020 ABN 49 092 687 119 Level 1, 228 Carr Place Leederville Western Australia 6007 Ph: (08) 9328 1900 Fax: (08) 9328 6138 Project No.: 1453 Prepared by: A. Lapinski, S. Werner, V. Ford, J. Graff Document Quality Checking History Version: Rev 0 Peer review: V. Ford, S. Werner Director review: M. Maier Format review: M. Maier Approved for issue: M. Maier This document has been prepared to the requirements of the client identified on the cover page and no representation is made to any third party. It may be cited for the purposes of scientific research or other fair use, but it may not be reproduced or distributed to any third party by any physical or electronic means without the express permission of the client for whom it was prepared or Biota Environmental Sciences Pty Ltd. This report has been designed for double-sided printing. Hard copies supplied by Biota are printed on recycled paper. Cube:Current:1453 (Kings Park Link Bridge):Documents:1453 Kings Park Link Bridge_Rev0.docx 3 PCH Pedestrian Bridge Vegetation, Flora and Black-cockatoo Assessment 4 Cube:Current:1453 (Kings Park Link Bridge):Documents:1453 Kings Park Link Bridge_Rev0.docx PCH Pedestrian Bridge Vegetation, Flora and Black-cockatoo Assessment PCH Pedestrian Bridge Vegetation, Flora and Black-cockatoo Assessment Contents 1.0 Executive
  • People Making Biodiversity Work  C.A.P.E

    People Making Biodiversity Work  C.A.P.E

    SANBI Biodiversity Series 4 (2006) people making biodiversity work C.A.P.E. Table Mountain Fund Signatory Partners SANBI Biodiversity Series 4 Fynbos Fynmense: people making biodiversity work Ally Ashwell Trevor Sandwith Mandy Barnett Asiza Parker Fumanekile Wisani Pretoria 2006 SANBI Biodiversity Series The South African National Biodiversity Institute (SANBI) was established on 1 Sep- tember 2004 through the signing into force of the National Environmental Manage- ment: Biodiversity Act (NEMBA) No. 10 of 2004 by President Thabo Mbeki. The Act expands the mandate of the former National Botanical Institute to include respon- sibilities relating to the full diversity of South Africa’s fauna and flora, and builds on the internationally respected programmes in conservation, research, education and visitor services developed by the National Botanical Institute and its predecessors over the past century. The vision of SANBI is to be the leading institution in biodiversity science in Africa, facilitating conservation, sustainable use of living resources, and human well-being. SANBI’s mission is to promote the sustainable use, conservation, appreciation and enjoyment of the exceptionally rich biodiversity of South Africa, for the benefit of all people. SANBI Biodiversity Series publishes occasional reports on projects, technologies, workshops, symposia and other activities initiated by or executed in partnership with SANBI. Design & layout: Sandra Turck Cover design: Sandra Turck How to cite this publication ASHWELL, A., SANDWITH, T., BARNETT, M., PARKER, A. & WISANI, F. 2006. Fynbos Fynmense: people making biodiversity work. SANBI Biodi- versity Series 4. South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria. ISBN 1-919976-29-9 © Published by: South African National Biodiversity Institute.