DOCSLIB.ORG

Lng Map 2015

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Hammerfest (Melkoya Island) SHTOKMAN SNØHVIT Pechora Sea NGT ASKELADD MELKØYA ALBATROSS BBL KEY DATA Hammerfest Zeebrugge BELGIUM Barcelona SPAIN Salekhard Start-up : 1987 Start-up : 1969 A6 KILDIN N WGT Installations per type Installations per country (Top 10) Barents Oude Statenzijl ADDITIONAL SERVICES STATUS MIN. SHIP SIZE CAPACITY (LNG) Sea ADDITIONAL SERVICES STATUS MIN. SHIP SIZE CAPACITY (LNG) Kirkenes Bunde 3 3 MURMAN Balgzand RELOADING YES 7.000 m LNG 5.000 m /h 3 3 RELOADING YES 2.000 m LNG 3.500 m /h Status Number of Installations* Julianadorp 3 by 2015 2.000 m LNG Wijster TRANSHIPMENT NO INTERCONNECTOR Amsterdam 2016 TRANSHIPMENT YES 2.000 m3 LNG 14.000 m3/h under under BUNKERSHIP LOADING under construction operational planned operational planned Pomorskiy Pesse 2015 BUNKERSHIP LOADING YES 7.000 m3 LNG 5.000 m3/h construction construction B 3 Rotterdam 3 TRUCK LOADING YES 3 x 91 m /h Strait by 2015 2.000 m LNG Murmansk 3 RAIL LOADING NO LNG terminals (large + small): 1. Spain 35 3 11 TRUCK LOADING YES 75 m /h Lødingen RAIL LOADING NO Reloading 14 2 12 2. Norway 35 - - Vlieghuis REYKJAVIK 2015 Huelva SPAIN Transhipment 3 2 3 3. UK 22 2 9 Moskenes Start-up : 1988 ICELAND B B 2016 AMSTERDAM Zwolle Fos Tonkin FRANCE Bunkership loading 9 7 10 4. Netherlands 17 5 6 Start-up : 1972 Truck loading 18 7 6 5. Sweden 13 - 10 THE NETHERLANDS ADDITIONAL SERVICES STATUS MIN. SHIP SIZE CAPACITY (LNG) Rail loading - - 4 Bodø Delfgauw Utrecht Emsbüren RELOADING YES 7.500 m3 LNG 3.700 m3/h 6. France 11 4 11 ADDITIONAL SERVICES STATUS MIN. SHIP SIZE CAPACITY (LNG) future smaller vessels Liquefaction plants 22 n.a. 2 under study 7. Belgium 7 5 1 Enschede RELOADING YES 5.000 m3 LNG 1.000 m3/h TRANSHIPMENT NO Bunkering facilities for vessels 26 5 22 8. Germany 5 3 9 Rotterdam Avenue de Cortenbergh 100 Tel +32 2 209 05 00 [email protected] TRANSHIPMENT NO Port Vitino BUNKERSHIP LOADING under study Duiven 5.000 m3 LNG 3 Bunker ships 5 4 6 9. Portugal 4 1 4 Moerdijk Winterswijk 1000 Brussels - BELGIUM Fax +32 2 209 05 01 www.gie.eu BUNKERSHIP LOADING YES 1.000 m /h 3 TRUCK LOADING YES 3 x 91 m /h Zevenaar 3 TRUCK LOADING YES 1 x 100 m /h Refuelling stations for trucks 70 14 19 10. Finland 2 8 5 Zeebrugge 3 RAIL LOADING NO Münster future 3 x 100 m /h Sandnessjøen Roosendael 2015 Satellite Storages >1000 n.a. n.a. Nijmegen 2014 RAIL LOADING NO * excl. satellite storages Oss Veurne Cartagena SPAIN Hilvarenbeek Dortmund 2015 B Start-up : 1989 Tornio Manga 2018 Poppel Berkel-Enschot Montoir de Bretagne FRANCE Zandvliet Antwerp NORNE Zeebrugge 2015 Mosjoen Zelzate Start-up : 1980 / Mosjøen White Sea Dortmund ADDITIONAL SERVICES STATUS MIN. SHIP SIZE CAPACITY (LNG) Tornio Manga LNG Essen B 3 3 2015 RELOADING YES 7.500 m LNG 3.500 m /h Alveringem future smaller vessels HELDRUN small scale ADDITIONAL SERVICES STATUS MIN. SHIP SIZE CAPACITY (LNG) ASGARD under study 2016 3 3 RELOADING YES 20.000 m LNG 4.000 m /h TRANSHIPMENT YES 7.500 m3 LNG 1.800 m3/h KRISTIN 3 3 Obbicht TRANSHIPMENT YES 20.000 m LNG 5.000 m /h HALTENPIPE BUNKERSHIP LOADING under study NJORD Dilsen future 14.000 m3/h BRUSSELS TRUCK LOADING YES 3 x 91 m3/h FAROE 3 3 ISLANDS BUNKERSHIP LOADING YES 20.000 m LNG 4.000 m /h (DK) RAIL LOADING under study DRAUGEN T Lille Broichweiden LNG MAP 2015 3 Brussels 2015 NORTHERN LIGHTS existing & planned infrastructure future 5.000 m LNG Haanrade Nievenheim for sea-road-waterways transport TRUCK LOADING YES 1 x 100 m3/h Bocholtz future 3 x 100 m3/h Bilbao SPAIN BELGIUM ‘s-Gravenvoeren Stolberg TRANSPORT Raeren / Lichtenbusch Start-up : 2003 Eynatten RAIL LOADING NO Tjeldbergodden ORMEN LANGE Trondheim BRETELLA In cooperation with : Quévy BRENT Blaregnies Taisnières ASGARD Fos Cavaou FRANCE ADDITIONAL SERVICES STATUS MIN. SHIP SIZE CAPACITY (LNG) MAGNUS Tampen Link MURCHINSON STATFJORD Tjeldbergodden 3 3 Kristiansund Start-up : 2010 RELOADING YES 65.000 m LNG 3.000 m /h SNORRE Nyhamna Gulf of Bothnia VISUND TRANSHIPMENT NO TERN Sundsvall KVITEBJØRN LANGELED NORTH GLE IS REPRESENTING 17 MEMBERS IN 9 COUNTRIES AND 1 OBSERVER BUNKERSHIP LOADING NO SHETLANDS GULLFAKS ADDITIONAL SERVICES STATUS MIN. SHIP SIZE CAPACITY (LNG) TRUCK LOADING YES 2 x 27 m3/h HEATHER MEMBERS 3 3 RELOADING YES 15.000 m LNG 4.000 m /h RAIL LOADING NO ALWYN HULDRA VESLEFRIKK Florø TRANSHIPMENT NO under study under study BRAGE 3 3 Petrozavodsk BUNKERSHIP LOADING YES 15.000 m LNG 4.000 m /h TUNE TROLL Tahkoluoto/Pori 2016 3 Sagunto SPAIN future 5.000 m LNG OSEBERG TOGI NORWAY SWEDEN FINLAND BELGIUM Kyroskoski NETHERLANDS Start-up : 2006 Tahkoluotot/Pori LNG TRUCK LOADING YES through Tampere Nokia Fos Tonkin Raum Pori2017 Ågotnes RAIL LOADING NO CoralOGT Methane Raum POLAND ADDITIONAL SERVICES STATUS MIN. SHIP SIZE CAPACITY (LNG) Gaevle 2017 Imatra Vyborg B Lahti Lappeenranta 3 3 STATPIPE Hordvikneset Hameenlinna RELOADING YES 30.000 m LNG 3.000 m /h Kouvola Kirov HEIMDAL Bergen Mannsverk Gaevle Pansio 2017 future smaller vessels BERYL Dunkerque LNG FRANCE FLAGS NLGP JOTUN Vyborg under study OUTER FUKA Kollsnes Hamina-Kotka 2018 HEBRIDES Mäntsälä Kotka PORTUGAL Start-up : 2015 TRANSHIPMENT NO Turku Primorsk Oslo Pansio LNG Finngulf LNG HELSINKI STATPIPE Tolkkinen FRANCE BUNKERSHIP LOADING future under study Kollsnes OSLO Lohja Primorsk VESTERLED Os Espoo 3 Hamina-Kotka TRUCK LOADING YES 2 x 70 m /h MILLER ZEEPIPE IIA Halhjem Porvoo Primorsk ADDITIONAL SERVICES STATUS MIN. SHIP SIZE CAPACITY (LNG) Bygnes Haugesund Stockholm Turku St. Petersburg RUSSIA RAIL LOADING NO SLEIPNER Örebro - Pilängen Karmøy Fredrikstad RELOADING YES 20.000 m3 LNG 4.500 m3/h PIPER Hanko Finngulf LNG Helsinki Ust-Luga ZEEPIPE IIB Kårstø B B B Fjusö, Ingå Muuga Gulf of Finland GREECE SAGE STATPIPE B CIS TRANSHIPMENT NO Avaldsnes SLEIPNER CONDENSATE Haukas BALTIC CONNECTOR Petrodvorets SPAIN Stavanger Järna (Södertälje) BUNKERSHIP LOADING under study Mugardos SPAIN St. Fergus Rafnes STOCKHOLM Narva Sea of the HebridesINNER FORTIES DRAUPNER Ora/ LNG Padalski Kingisepp TRUCK LOADING under study Start-up : 2007 HEBRIDES FUKA BRITTANNIA Pioneer KnutsenSkangass (Fredrikstad) Risavika TALLINN RAIL LOADING NO Muuga Tallinn EVEREST Brunnsviksholmen Padalski 2015 Risavika (Stavanger) (Nynäshamn) NELSON Lysekil ESTONIA ADDITIONAL SERVICES STATUS MIN. SHIP SIZE CAPACITY (LNG) Lysekil STATPIPE EUROPIPE I Nikolskoye EUROPIPE II EUROPIPE Nynashamn Revithoussa GREECE RELOADING YES 7.500 m3 LNG 2.000 m3/h Lysekil North Stenungsund Yaroslavl Cheboksary Kazan by 2017 1.500 m3 LNG Jonköping ITALY UNITED KINGDOM Start-up : 2000 Vallby Kile ELGIN Pärnu TRANSHIPMENT under study North Channel Glasgow Edinburgh Sea FRANKLIN Göteborg 2015 JönKöping 3 3 Skagerrak Göteborg Nizhny Novgorod BUNKERSHIP LOADING YES 7.500 m LNG 2.000 m /h ULA Hirtshals 2015 OBSERVERS Göteborg LNG Värska Pskov 3 Kattegat Karksi ADDITIONAL SERVICES STATUS MIN. SHIP SIZE CAPACITY (LNG) TRUCK LOADING YES 2 x 75 m /h GYDA Gulf of Misso Aalborg Gislaved Gnosjö IRELAND RELOADING planned in 5-10 years RAIL LOADING NO Nerston, Glasgow Livingstone 2015 LULITA Riga Izborsk EKOFISK NORD STREAM HARALD Göteborg TRANSHIPMENT NO Moat FULMAR Korneti VALHALL Varberg BUNKERSHIP LOADING planned in 5-10 years Cluden EUROPIPE II Londonderry SNIP Gijón (Musel) SPAIN Twynholm HOD TRUCK LOADING NO / Derry CATS SYD Halmstad Ballylumford ARNE Riga Start-up : * CORRIB Londonderry Nortallerton RAIL LOADING NO Brighouse Bay SOURCE DATABASE Belfast DENMARK Bellanaboy Teesside TYRA RIGA LATVIA Details for all installations are provided in the corresponding database published on : Teesport 2016 Helsingborg SEAL EUROPIPE Samara Teesside Rezekne MOSCOW ISLE OF MAN LANGELED SOUTH www.gie.eu/maps-data Panigaglia ITALY ADDITIONAL SERVICES STATUS MIN. SHIP SIZE CAPACITY (LNG) Tebay (M6) Copenhagen Malmö Liepaja Iecava PortMeridian Nybro Start-up : 1971 RELOADING NO Barrow Aarhus Teesport, Middlesbrough Fredericia Klaipéda INTERCONNECTOR 2 Malmö v Kieménai MAP LEGEND TRANSHIPMENT NO Egtved COPENHAGEN FSRU Independence Kuršėnai IRELAND Gormanston Castleford F3 Trelleborg INTERCONNECTOR 1 Wakeeld 2015 Daugavpils Irish MURDOCH NORPIPE Dragør v BUNKERSHIP LOADING NO Loughshinny Avedore Siauliai the indication of interconnection points is consistent with all other GIE grid maps Sea Leeds FRANPIPE NORD STREAM FSRU Independence KKP ADDITIONAL SERVICES STATUS MIN. SHIP SIZE CAPACITY (LNG) Galway ZEEPIPE Trelleborg TRUCK LOADING NO DUBLIN Anglesey Bawtry Yorkshire Klaipéda W. SOLE Baltic Sea Panevėžys GIE Member Countries Other Countries RELOADING NO RAIL LOADING NO Manchester MARKHAM Ellund Visaginas Penza ROUGH NOGAT Orsha TRANSHIPMENT NO Warrington Easington (*) The start-up of El Musel LNG plant is conditioned to authorisation Point of Ayr BALTIC PIPE LITHUANIA METHYS Small Scale LNG Infrastructure BUNKERSHIP LOADING internal discussion started by the Government South Manchester 2015 Jurbarkas AUDREY DEUDAN Rostock Limerick Lymm Kaliningrad Jauniunai TRUCK LOADING internal discussion started Nottingham Theddlethorpe SEAL HEWETT under construction planned Brunsbüttel 2015 in operation Shannon LNG Shareshill LOGGS Šakiai Kaunas VILNIUS RAIL LOADING NO Isle of Grain UNITED KINGDOM Shepshed Leicestershire GALLION Kotlovka Lübeck 2016 Rostock Rotterdam Hamburg 2016 YAMAL Start-up : 2005 Waterford UNITED Bacton LEMAN Kaliningrad LNG import terminal oering new LNG services Birmingham Dornum Greifswald Świnoujście LNG Kaliningrad Daventry / DIRFT Gdansk RUSSIA AmsterdamNGT 2016 Groningen Quarnstedt Niechorze South Hook LNG Emden Porto Levante ITALY Cork KINGDOMDroitwich Warwick Wellingborough Hamburg Inch LNG liquefaction plant / liquefaction station BBL A6 Saratov Lutterworth 2015 INTERCONNECTOR WGT B Świnoujście Start-up : 2009 MilfordMilford Haven Haven Wijster Bremen 2015 NEL ADDITIONAL SERVICES STATUS MIN. SHIP SIZE CAPACITY (LNG) South Hook LNG 2015 Kamminke MINSK Dragon LNG Avonmouth M42/M6 interchange 2015 Oude Statenzijl B B Płoty 3 Pesse 2015 Olsztyn LNG bunker facility for vessels / fuel loading ship (on-shore) RELOADING YES 60.000 m LNG ship dep.
Recommended publications
  • Northern Sea Route Cargo Flows and Infrastructure- Present State And

    Northern Sea Route Cargo Flows and Infrastructure- Present State And

    Northern Sea Route Cargo Flows and Infrastructure – Present State and Future Potential By Claes Lykke Ragner FNI Report 13/2000 FRIDTJOF NANSENS INSTITUTT THE FRIDTJOF NANSEN INSTITUTE Tittel/Title Sider/Pages Northern Sea Route Cargo Flows and Infrastructure – Present 124 State and Future Potential Publikasjonstype/Publication Type Nummer/Number FNI Report 13/2000 Forfatter(e)/Author(s) ISBN Claes Lykke Ragner 82-7613-400-9 Program/Programme ISSN 0801-2431 Prosjekt/Project Sammendrag/Abstract The report assesses the Northern Sea Route’s commercial potential and economic importance, both as a transit route between Europe and Asia, and as an export route for oil, gas and other natural resources in the Russian Arctic. First, it conducts a survey of past and present Northern Sea Route (NSR) cargo flows. Then follow discussions of the route’s commercial potential as a transit route, as well as of its economic importance and relevance for each of the Russian Arctic regions. These discussions are summarized by estimates of what types and volumes of NSR cargoes that can realistically be expected in the period 2000-2015. This is then followed by a survey of the status quo of the NSR infrastructure (above all the ice-breakers, ice-class cargo vessels and ports), with estimates of its future capacity. Based on the estimated future NSR cargo potential, future NSR infrastructure requirements are calculated and compared with the estimated capacity in order to identify the main, future infrastructure bottlenecks for NSR operations. The information presented in the report is mainly compiled from data and research results that were published through the International Northern Sea Route Programme (INSROP) 1993-99, but considerable updates have been made using recent information, statistics and analyses from various sources.
  • Indictment Presented to the International Military Tribunal (Nuremberg, 18 October 1945)

    Indictment Presented to the International Military Tribunal (Nuremberg, 18 October 1945)

    Indictment presented to the International Military Tribunal (Nuremberg, 18 October 1945) Caption: On 18 October 1945, the International Military Tribunal in Nuremberg accuses 24 German political, military and economic leaders of conspiracy, crimes against peace, war crimes and crimes against humanity. Source: Indictment presented to the International Military Tribunal sitting at Berlin on 18th October 1945. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office, November 1945. 50 p. (Cmd. 6696). p. 2-50. Copyright: Crown copyright is reproduced with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office and the Queen's Printer for Scotland URL: http://www.cvce.eu/obj/indictment_presented_to_the_international_military_tribunal_nuremberg_18_october_1945-en- 6b56300d-27a5-4550-8b07-f71e303ba2b1.html Last updated: 03/07/2015 1 / 46 03/07/2015 Indictment presented to the International Military Tribunal (Nuremberg, 18 October 1945) INTERNATIONAL MILITARY TRIBUNAL THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, THE FRENCH REPUBLIC, THE UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND, AND THE UNION OF SOVIET SOCIALIST REPUBLICS — AGAINST — HERMANN WILHELM GÖRING, RUDOLF HESS, JOACHIM VON RIBBENTROP, ROBERT LEY, WILHELM KEITEL, ERNST KALTEN BRUNNER, ALFRED ROSENBERG, HANS FRANK, WILHELM FRICK, JULIUS STREICHER, WALTER FUNK, HJALMAR SCHACHT, GUSTAV KRUPP VON BOHLEN UND HALBACH, KARL DÖNITZ, ERICH RAEDER, BALDUR VON SCHIRACH, FRITZ SAUCKEL, ALFRED JODL, MARTIN BORMANN, FRANZ VON PAPEN, ARTUR SEYSS INQUART, ALBERT SPEER, CONSTANTIN VON NEURATH, AND HANS FRITZSCHE,
  • Comparative Analysis of the Historical Circumstances Surrounding the Emergence and Activities of the Czechoslovak, Slovenian and Croatian Orel/Orao Movements

    Comparative Analysis of the Historical Circumstances Surrounding the Emergence and Activities of the Czechoslovak, Slovenian and Croatian Orel/Orao Movements

    UDK: 796:061.1(497.5)‘‘18/19‘‘ 929 Merz, I. Izvorni znanstveni članak Received: June 21, 2013 Accepted: October 10, 2013 COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE HISTORICAL CIRCUMSTANCES SURROUNDING THE EMERGENCE AND ACTIVITIES OF THE CZECHOSLOVAK, SLOVENIAN AND CROATIAN OREL/ORAO MOVEMENTS Saša CERAJ* Th e beginnings of the Orel movement can be found in the Czech lands and Slovakia at the end of the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, where it was a response to liberal trends and the Sokol organization, but also a move- ment founded in the Slav/cultural discourse which aspired to Orel mutual- ism, cultural unity and equal status as creators of European thought and socio-cultural renewal. Th e Orel movement came via Slovenia to Croatia, where the unifi ed orientation of the Croatian Orao movement was deter- mined by Ivan Merz through the introduction of the a specifi c course for the Croatian Orao movement, particularly apparent in the guidelines set forth in the encyclical Ubi Arcano Dei: political neutrality, a new approach to physical culture and comprehensive personal growth. Th is article ana- lyzes the activity of the Orel/Orao movement in Czechoslovakia, Slovenia and Croatia and ascertains the specifi c aspects of the Croatian Orao Fed- eration, summarizing them under the term Croatian Orao specifi cum. Key words: Czechoslovak Orel movement, Slovenian Orel movement, Croatian Orao movement, Croatian Orao Federation, Croatian Orao spe- cifi cum. ∗ Saša Ceraj, Ph.D., Croatian Olympic Academy, Zagreb, Croatia. 77 S. CERAJ, Comparative Analysis of the Historical Circumstances Surrounding the Emergence and Activities Introduction Th e beginnings of the Orel/Orao (‘eagle’) movement can be found in the Czech at the end of the nineteenth and very early twentieth centuries, where it constituted something of a response to the appearance and infl uence of liberal trends and the Sokol organization, and it began to spread to Slovenia, whence it also made its way to Croatia, where, under the infl uence of Dr.
  • Joint Barents Transport Plan Proposals for Development of Transport Corridors for Further Studies

    Joint Barents Transport Plan Proposals for Development of Transport Corridors for Further Studies

    Joint Barents Transport Plan Proposals for development of transport corridors for further studies September 2013 Front page photos: Kjetil Iversen, Rune N. Larsen and Sindre Skrede/NRK Table of Contents Table Summary 7 1 Introduction 12 1.1 Background 12 1.2 Objectives and members of the Expert Group 13 1.3 Mandate and tasks 14 1.4 Scope 14 1.5 Methodology 2 Transport objectives 15 2.1 National objectives 15 2.2 Expert Group’s objective 16 3 Key studies, work and projects of strategic importance 17 3.1 Multilateral agreements and forums for cooperation 17 3.2 Multilateral projects 18 3.4 National plans and studies 21 4 Barents Region – demography, climate and main industries 23 4.1 Area and population 23 4.2 Climate and environment 24 4.3 Overview of resources and key industries 25 4.4 Ores and minerals 25 4.5 Metal industry 27 4.6 Seafood industry 28 4.7 Forest industry 30 4.8 Petroleum industry 32 4.9 Tourism industry 35 4.10 Overall transport flows 37 4.11 Transport hubs 38 5 Main border-crossing corridors in the Barents Region 40 5.1 Corridor: “The Bothnian Corridor”: Oulu – Haparanda/Tornio - Umeå 44 5.2 Corridor: Luleå – Narvik 49 5.3 Corridor: Vorkuta – Syktyvkar – Kotlas – Arkhangelsk - Vartius – Oulu 54 5.4 Corridor: “The Northern Maritime Corridor”: Arkhangelsk – Murmansk – The European Cont. 57 5.5 Corridor: “The Motorway of the Baltic Sea”: Luleå/Kemi/Oulu – The European Continent 65 5.6 Corridor: Petrozavodsk – Murmansk – Kirkenes 68 5.7 Corridor: Kemi – Salla – Kandalaksha 72 5.8 Corridor: Kemi – Rovaniemi – Kirkenes 76
  • MARITIME ACTIVITY in the HIGH NORTH – CURRENT and ESTIMATED LEVEL up to 2025 MARPART Project Report 1

    MARITIME ACTIVITY in the HIGH NORTH – CURRENT and ESTIMATED LEVEL up to 2025 MARPART Project Report 1

    MARITIME ACTIVITY IN THE HIGH NORTH – CURRENT AND ESTIMATED LEVEL UP TO 2025 MARPART Project Report 1 Authors: Odd Jarl Borch, Natalia Andreassen, Nataly Marchenko, Valur Ingimundarson, Halla Gunnarsdóttir, Iurii Iudin, Sergey Petrov, Uffe Jacobsen and Birita í Dali List of authors Odd Jarl Borch Project Leader, Nord University, Norway Natalia Andreassen Nord University, Norway Nataly Marchenko The University Centre in Svalbard, Norway Valur Ingimundarson University of Iceland Halla Gunnarsdóttir University of Iceland Iurii Iudin Murmansk State Technical University, Russia Sergey Petrov Murmansk State Technical University, Russia Uffe Jakobsen University of Copenhagen, Denmark Birita í Dali University of Greenland 1 Partners MARPART Work Package 1 “Maritime Activity and Risk” 2 THE MARPART RESEARCH CONSORTIUM The management, organization and governance of cross-border collaboration within maritime safety and security operations in the High North The key purpose of this research consortium is to assess the risk of the increased maritime activity in the High North and the challenges this increase may represent for the preparedness institutions in this region. We focus on cross-institutional and cross-country partnerships between preparedness institutions and companies. We elaborate on the operational crisis management of joint emergency operations including several parts of the preparedness system and resources from several countries. The project goals are: • To increase understanding of the future demands for preparedness systems in the High North including both search and rescue, oil spill recovery, fire fighting and salvage, as well as capacities fighting terror or other forms of destructive action. • To study partnerships and coordination challenges related to cross-border, multi-task emergency cooperation • To contribute with organizational tools for crisis management Project characteristics: Financial support: -Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, -the Nordland county Administration -University partners.
  • Argus Nefte Transport

    Argus Nefte Transport

    Argus Nefte Transport Oil transportation logistics in the former Soviet Union Volume XVI, 5, May 2017 Primorsk loads first 100,000t diesel cargo Russia’s main outlet for 10ppm diesel exports, the Baltic port of Primorsk, shipped a 100,000t cargo for the first time this month. The diesel was loaded on 4 May on the 113,300t Dong-A Thetis, owned by the South Korean shipping company Dong-A Tanker. The 100,000t cargo of Rosneft product was sold to trading company Vitol for delivery to the Amsterdam-Rotter- dam-Antwerp region, a market participant says. The Dong-A Thetis was loaded at Russian pipeline crude exports berth 3 or 4 — which can handle crude and diesel following a recent upgrade, and mn b/d can accommodate 90,000-150,000t vessels with 15.5m draught. 6.0 Transit crude Russian crude It remains unclear whether larger loadings at Primorsk will become a regular 5.0 occurrence. “Smaller 50,000-60,000t cargoes are more popular and the terminal 4.0 does not always have the opportunity to stockpile larger quantities of diesel for 3.0 export,” a source familiar with operations at the outlet says. But the loading is significant considering the planned 10mn t/yr capacity 2.0 addition to the 15mn t/yr Sever diesel pipeline by 2018. Expansion to 25mn t/yr 1.0 will enable Transneft to divert more diesel to its pipeline system from ports in 0.0 Apr Jul Oct Jan Apr the Baltic states, in particular from the pipeline to the Latvian port of Ventspils.
  • Years of Sustainable Development

    Years of Sustainable Development

    Years of Sustainable 20 Development NOVATEK Sustainability Report for 2014 CONTENTS Letter from the Chief Executive Officer 3 Preserving Cultural Heritage 52 Sports 52 Report and Reporting Process 6 Volunteering 53 NOVATEK`s Social Reporting Development 6 NOVATEK-Veteran Program 53 Principles for Defining Report Content 6 Report Boundary 8 Employment Practices 55 NOVATEK Group’s Structure Changes 8 Personnel 55 Corporate Technical Competency Assessment System 58 Company Profile 10 Personnel Training and Development 58 The Company’s Scope and Key Lines of Business 10 Trade Union Relations 59 Geography 10 Social Policy 59 The Company’s Structure as at 31 December 2014 13 Our Business Model 14 Procurement Practices 64 Share Capital 15 Key Approaches 64 Membership in Trade Associations 16 Supply Chain Management 64 Awards 16 Import Substitution Policy 64 Key Performance Indicators 16 Occupational Health and Safety 66 Sustainability Strategy 18 Occupational Health and Safety Goals and Objectives 66 Special Assessment of Working Conditions 66 Stakeholder Engagement 21 Operational Control 66 Basics of Stakeholder Engagement 21 Fire Safety 68 Stakeholder Engagement Matrix 23 Accidents and Incidents 68 Corporate Governance 29 Contractor Engagement 68 Corporate Governance Principles 29 Workplace Injury Rate 68 Corporate Governance Structure 29 OHS Training 68 BoD and Management Board Remuneration Packages 34 Environmental Protection 70 Internal Control and Audit 35 Environmental Vision 70 Risk Management 36 Environmental Monitoring and Industrial
  • Russia and the Arctic: the New Great Game 1 Dr Mark a Smith

    Russia and the Arctic: the New Great Game 1 Dr Mark a Smith

    Advanced Research and Assessment Group Russi an Series 07/26 Defence Academy of the United Kingdom The Last Dash North Dr Mark A Smith & Keir Giles Contents Russia and the Arctic: The New Great Game 1 Dr Mark A Smith Looking North 10 Keir Giles Key Points * The belief that the North Pole region could contain large quantities of oil and gas is one of the major forces driving Russian policy. The North Pole expedition of July-August 2007 is laying the ground for submitting a claim to the UN Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf that the Lomonosov Ridge belongs to Russia. * Russia’s claims will be challenged by Canada, the USA and Denmark. The Arctic region is likely to become a region of geopolitical competition later in the 21st century as the ice cap melts. * There is a widespread view in Russia that its claim to Arctic territory is not speculative, but rightful compensation for territorial losses in Europe. * Any foreign interest in the area, government, commercial or environmental, is seen as hostile intent. * Armed action by NATO to contest Russia’s Arctic claims is discussed as a serious possibility. * Reports of the death of the Russian North are greatly exaggerated, as they take no account of commercial rebirth based on the oil industry. * Russia has a well-developed commercial and transport infrastructure to take advantage of opportunities offered by the retreating icecap, in contrast to other littoral states. * Naval re-armament and increased military activity mean the same applies to capacity for military action. This map has been supplied courtesy of the University of Texas Libraries, The Univeristy of Texas at Austin.
  • The European Natural Gas Network

    The European Natural Gas Network

    SHTOKMAN SNØHVIT Pechora Sea ASKELADD MELKØYA TRADING POINTS / MARKET AREAS KEYS ALBATROSS Hammerfest Salekhard (DK) (IE) Nr Location System Operators : logos Barents 400 NPTF 407 IBP 01 Trading Points / Market Areas KILDIN N (CH-IT) Sea (DK) (FR-N) 027 Griespass (CH) / Passo Gries (IT) 401 GTF (Bilateral Trading Point) 408 PEG NORD Cross-border interconnection point Cross-border Europe 001 1A 1A within Europe Under construction or Planned MURMAN (NL) (IT) FluxSwiss Snam Rete Gas Y B 11,349 11,349 402 TTF 411 PSV 634,7 001 Cross-border interconnection point Cross-border third country import/export Swissgas Snam Rete Gas N B 11,349 11,349 with third country (import/export) Under construction or Planned (DE) (ES) Min Max Pomorskiy 403 VHP GASPOOL 412 PVB System Operators Capacity Flow GCV 001 LNG Terminals’ entry point LNG Import Terminal 1C Strait (HU) intro transmission system Under construction or Planned Murmansk 413 MGP Capacity 622,6 Max. technical physical capacity in GWh/d LNG Export Terminal 1C LNG Export Terminal (AT ) Under construction or Planned Where dierent Maximum Technical Capacities are dened by the neighbouring 414 CEGH TSOs for the same Interconnection Point, the lesserREYKJAVIK rule is applied. Small scale LNG liquefaction plant Small scale LNG liquefaction plant If capacity information is available only on one side of the border (BE) 415 ZTP (Zeebrugge Trading Point H-Zone) Under construction or Planned due to condentiality reasons, the available gure is selected for publication. Interconnections shown on map only
  • Development of the Russian Sea Port Infrastructure. Automotive Logistics

    Development of the Russian Sea Port Infrastructure. Automotive Logistics

    Development of the Russian Sea Port Infrastructure. Automotive Logistics. Container Logistics in Russia. ɝ. ɋɚɧɤɬ-ɉɟɬɟɪɛɭɪɝ, ɭɥ. ɉɨɥɢɬɟɯɧɢɱɟɫɤɚɹ, ɞ. 29 Ɍɟɥɟɮɨɧ: (812) 333-13-10, Ɏɚɤɫ: (812) 333-13-11 e-mail: [email protected] www.morproekt.ru 1 Morstroytechnology, LLC (MST for short) Our engineering background contributes to the approach to logistic analysis. We focus on: Pre-Design Research: Feasibility Study, Business Planning, Development Concepts etc. ; Engineering and Design: • universal and dedicated port terminals (general cargo, container, dry bulk, liquid bulk etc.); • logistic centers and related infrastructure; • optimization of hydraulic constructions Supervision; General Design; Consulting and Engineering; Berths and Buildings Survey; Engineering Survey; Marketing Research, traffic forecasting; Logistic Strategy; Logistic Optimization; Feasibility Study http://www.morproekt.ru/ 2 Plan Changes in Logistic and Infrastructure. Transformation of the Soviet Transport System «Renaissance» of Port Construction in 1990-2000. Growth Factors Review of Cargo Flows. Modal Split Russian Transport System Geography Baltic Sea. Throughput of the Baltic Sea Ports Main Development Projects in the Inner Harbors of St. Petersburg St. Petersburg Outer Ports Development Projects Ports Ust-Luga, Vysotsk, Kaliningrad Russian Transport System Geography – Arctic. Throughput of the Arctic Ports Murmansk Transport Node. Development of SCP Murmansk, Lavna, Sabetta Terminal at Cape Kamenniy – Branch of Sabetta Port Black and Azov Seas. Ports’ Throughput Ports Taman, Novorossiysk Caspian Sea. Ports’ Throughput Far Eastern Ports. Ports’ Throughput Coal terminals at the Far East – Vostochny, Vanino, others Oil and oil products terminals on the Far East of Russia Disproportion of Sea Port and Railway Infrastructure Russian Automotive Logistics Market Russian Container Market http://www.morproekt.ru/ 3 Long-period Changes in Logistic and Infrastructure.
  • Toward the Great Ocean—2, Or Russia's Breakthrough to Asia

    Toward the Great Ocean—2, Or Russia's Breakthrough to Asia

    Moscow, February 2014 valdaiclub.com Toward the Great Ocean—2, or Russia’s Breakthrough to Asia Valdai Discussion Club Report Toward the Great Ocean—2, or Russia’s Breakthrough to Asia Valdai Discussion Club Report Moscow, February 2014 valdaiclub.com Executive Editor and Head Authors of the Authors’ Group Igor Makarov Sergei Karaganov principal author, lecturer at the Department of Dean of the Faculty of World Economy World Economy, National Research University and International Affairs at the National Higher School of Economics; Research University — Higher School of Ph.D. in Economics Economics; Honorary Chairman of the Presidium of the Council on Foreign and Oleg Barabanov Defense Policy (CFDP); D.Sc. in History Head of the Department of Policy and Functioning of the European Union and the European Council, Moscow State Institute of International Relations; professor at the Project scientific supervisors Department of International Affairs, National Research University — Higher School of Sergei Karaganov Economics; D.Sc. in Political Science Dean of the Faculty of World Economy and International Affairs at the National Timofei Bordachev Research University — Higher School of Director of the Center for Comprehensive Economics; Honorary Chairman of the European and International Studies, National Presidium of the Council on Foreign and Research University — Higher School of Defense Policy (CFDP); D.Sc. in History Economics; Ph.D. in Political Science Victor Larin Evgeny Kanaev Director of the Institute of History, professor at the Department of International Archaeology and Ethnography of the Affairs, National Research University — Higher Peoples of the Far East, Far Eastern School of Economics; D.Sc. in History Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences; D.Sc.
  • DEVELOPMENT of MARINE RUSSIAN-NORWEGIAN TRADE FACILITIES in NORTHERN NORWAY Prefeasibility Study

    DEVELOPMENT of MARINE RUSSIAN-NORWEGIAN TRADE FACILITIES in NORTHERN NORWAY Prefeasibility Study

    DEVELOPMENT OF MARINE RUSSIAN-NORWEGIAN TRADE FACILITIES IN NORTHERN NORWAY Prefeasibility study Akvaplan-niva AS Report: 4673-01 This page is intentionally left blank Cover page photo: Yenisey – newly built ice-class tanker of Norilsk Nickel in Murmansk port on her way to Dudinka, October 2011. Photo by Bjørn Franzen, Bioforsk Svanhovd. Akvaplan-niva AS Rådgivning og forskning innen miljø og akvakultur Org.nr: NO 937 375 158 MVA Framsenteret, 9296 Tromsø, Norge Tlf: +47 7775 0300, Fax: +47 7775 0301 www.akvaplan.niva.no Report title Development of marine Russian-Norwegian trade facilities in Northern Norway. Prefeasibility study Author(s) Akvaplan-niva report number Alexei Bambulyak, Akvaplan-niva 4673-01 Rune Rautio, Akvaplan-niva Mikhail Grigoriev, Gecon Date 07.03.2012 No. of pages 48 Distribution open Client Client’s reference Norwegian Barents Secretariat Rune Rafaelsen Maritimt Forum Nord SA Tor Husjord Summary This report presents the results of the preliminary evaluations of feasibilities and a potential for development of trade and transport communication between Russia and Norway with focus on possibilities and needs for increased marine infrastructure and harbors in the Northern Norway for transshipment of oil, coal and metals for international markets, and establishment of a hub for trading the goods internationally. This project discusses different aspects of establishing trade port facilities in the Northern Norway which may be of interest and benefit for all stakeholders – Russian, Norwegian and international businesses. Project manager Quality controller __________________________ __________________________ Alexei Bambulyak Salve Dahle © 2012 Akvaplan-niva AS & Clients. This report may only be copied as a whole. Copying of part of this report (sections of text, illustrations, tables, conclusions, etc.) and/or reproduction in other ways, is only permitted with written consent from Akvaplan-niva AS and Clients.