Peace Prize 2014 Speeches

Jaron Lanier 2014 Alexiev ich 2013 Liao 2012 Sansal 2011 Grossman 2010 Magris 2009 Kiefer 2008 Friedländer 2007 Lepenies 2006 Pamuk 2005 Esterházy 2004 Sontag 2003 Achebe 2002 Habermas 2001 Djebar 2000 Stern 1999 Walser 1998 Kemal 1997 Vargas Llosa 1996 Schimmel 1995 Semprún 1994 Schorlemmer 1993 Oz 1992 Peace Prize of the German Book Trade 2014 Konrád 1991 Conferment Speeches Dedecius 1990 Havel 1989 Lenz 1988 Jonas 1987 Bartoszewski 1986 Kollek 1985 Paz 1984 Sperber 1983 Kennan 1982 Kopelew 1981 Cardenal 1980 Menuhin 1979 Lindgren 1978 Kołakowski 1977 Frisch 1976 Grosser 1975 Frère Roger 1974 The Club of Rome 1973 Korczak 1972 Dönhoff 1971 Myrdal 1970 Mitscherlich 1969 Senghor 1968 Bloch 1967 Bea/Visser 't Hooft 1966 Sachs 1965 Marcel 1964 Weizsäcker 1963 Tillich 1962 Radhakrishnan 1961 Gollancz 1960 Heuss 1959 Jaspers 1958 Wilder 1957 Schneider 1956 Hesse 1955 Burckhardt 1954 Buber 1953 Guardini 1952 Schweitzer 1951 Tau 1950 Peace Prize of the German Book Trade 2014 Heinrich Riethmüller , President of the German Publishers and Booksellers Association Greeting This year, the Börsenverein is awarding the Peace Prize to the American musician, artist and computer scientist Jaron Lanier, one of the fiercest critics of digital “The sick butterfly will soon recall the sea, capitalism. This choice stands in stark contrast to prior this stone with the inscription of the fly has given itself decisions, and yet it is also entirely consistent with into my hand. them. Instead of home, I hold the transformations of the Jaron Lanier shows clearly that we are in one of world.” modern mankind’s decisive epochs. We all make use of the seemingly free and all-embracing wealth of information so as to communicate and further our It was fifty years ago that the poet Nelly Sachs stood knowledge. For the first time in human history, it takes on this very site and read her poetry aloud. In those us only seconds to arrive at conclusions and satisfy our days, the discussion was still determined by Adorno’s material and virtual desires at just one click. For dictum that it would be barbaric to write poetry after oppressed individuals and peoples, these new Auschwitz. Whether consciously or subconsciously—this communication platforms hold the promise of liberation; endowed Nelly Sachs’s speech with highly topical and to start revolutions and topple dictators. Democratic lasting relevance. societies, meanwhile, profit from informational diversity and new decision-making processes. * This brave new world makes us self-sufficient and Recipients of the Peace Prize bear witness to their independent; it represents progress, security and times. They advocate peace and freedom, they conceive prosperity. But as we surf the Internet, place orders ideas for a peaceful world, they overcome obstacles and online, keep up with old friends and voice our opinions, break alleged taboos: we leave traces and data to be collected and analysed by international corporations. We make ourselves There are the recipients of the early 1950s—Max Tau, dependent upon the global monopolists who evade not Albert Schweitzer, and Martin Buber—all of whom hold a just federal and social scrutiny but, indeed, the very mirror to their German heritage; one that was to break conversation about these matters. the mould of the country’s cultural and social isolation. Those who conceived of this new world succumb to There are scientists, political scientists and philosophers the fantasy—indeed, the certainty—that human beings, in such as Carl Friedrich von Weizsäcker, Alexander their words and deeds, are predictable and calculable, Mitscherlich and Ernst Bloch, whose utopias turn into that all the world’s problems can be solved and that hope, who reveal that which is inhumane, who draw up there are models for everything. Servers, databases and blueprints for a peaceful future. giant machines rule the world; they are superior to people in many ways. He who owns the greatest data There are the victims and witnesses of Germany’s storage, claims Jaron Lanier, is the most powerful. And ghastly and violent past, such as Janusz Korczak, Fritz he who is the most powerful determines the way of the Stern, and Saul Friedländer—whom we meet with world. humility—and who, in spite of all the inflicted suffering, continue to act in the spirit of reconciliation. Are human beings in the process of doing away with themselves and are we about to give up on the values There are Astrid Lindgren, the author of children’s we had hitherto deemed important? What is the price books, Yehudi Menuhin, the musician, and Siegfried that we will have to pay for being so insouciant, so Lenz, who passed away this week. He was one of the complacent? Will we be able to tame the spirits we’ve most important writers for me. summoned? Will artificial intelligence develop in the All of them, alongside the recipients in most recent service of mankind or will we soon live in the sort of years—David Grossman, Liao Yiwu, Boualem Sansal, and society that even Aldous Huxley or George Orwell could Svetlana Alexiyevitch, whose books all deal with the not have imagined? subject of war and oppression—have left a decisive imprint upon the history of the Peace Prize, which is also the history of Germany and its neighbours. 2 Peace Prize of the German Book Trade 2014 At the heart of the debate sparked by Jaron Lanier When our world is described in terms that are all too some years ago lies the question as to whether huma- beautiful, when those in power—and in our day and age nity will be able to uphold the individuality — and thus they are often no longer politicians—potently suggest the personal freedom—of each single person, without that we do not live in fear but in the belief in progress, foregoing the advantages of the digital world, or then a poem by one of Nelly Sachs’s contemporaries whether we will enter into an ever-increasing dependen- comes to mind. Günter Eich wrote his famous “Wacht cy on machines, making man himself into an algorithm, Auf” ("Wake Up") over 60 years ago. It reads: into a mathematical model. Jaron Lanier does not "No, sleep not, while the masters of the world get to content himself with the role of analyst and admonisher, business! but he develops strategies that may enable us to Be wary of the might to which they claim to be entitled surmount the danger of becoming altogether dependent on your behalf. on technology and machines. Take caution that your hearts be not empty when their Everyone who looks into these matters and gives emptiness is presumed! thought to the dangers of our new world runs the risk of Take to folly, sing songs not expected from your being labelled a cultural pessimist, a luddite. There is mouths! little pleasure in questioning modernity; complacency’s Be nuisances, be sand, not oil in the wheels of the sweet poison seeps through us. But critical engagement world." is not to be confused with pessimism, nor with Jarod Larnier once said in an interview: “People are pathological resistance towards progress. not computers. People have a mystical quality. If you Does the diversity promised by digital life not turn lose faith in humanity, you lose faith in a society that into uniformity if we consent to being reduced to acts in the service of humanity.” It is his struggle for a “gadgets” and if we allow our virtual selves to be based society in the service of humanity that connects him on the trail of data we have left online? Are we not with other Peace Prize recipients. In this sense, Lanier’s relinquishing something that is fundamental to our views on digital humanism are reminiscent of Martin humanity and our capacity for growth? Do we not, in Buber, who considered a real dialogue between two fact, give up a part of our personality—steeped as it is in people to be feasible only if neither one sees the other our imagination, our capability of abstraction, our as an object—or, in the parlance of our times—as a creativity, and, not least, in our inadequacies? gadget. It is already possible today to analyse someone’s reading habits on the basis of data stored in e-book * readers. It is already possible today to coerce authors to write books based on these insights. It would also be Ladies and gentleman, if we succeed in not being possible today to offer readers a book that meets exactly blinded by the self-proclaimed designers of our world, if the wishes and expectations wrested from their e-book we question critically what modernity has in store for readers. But isn’t this alleged gourmet menu in fact just us, if we accept ideas that are controversial and that fast food, fully seasoned yet mind-numbingly boring? seek to sustain our individuality, then I am not worried about our future. But for such a future we need Do we want authors to pander to an audience, or do convincing and optimistic thinkers. Thinkers such as we want artists to give voice, in writing, to their true Jaron Lanier. concerns? Ein Mensch ist ein Mensch ist ein Mensch ; all human beings are full of errors and shortcomings. This Translated into English by The Hagedorn Group. is why there is personal growth—in which technology should aid but not command us. Only then can the advantages inherent to it become ours. 3 Peace Prize of the German Book Trade 2014 Peter Feldmann, Lord Mayor of the City of Frankfurt Greeting We are proud that this distinguished award is pre- tures of cities – which were built up over the course of sented here each year on the occasion of the Frankfurt many centuries – have become highly attractive once Book Fair.

Load more