DOCSLIB.ORG

Change Management in an Economy of Speed

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Change Management in an Economy of Speed Change management in an Economy of Speed APO Study meeting June 23, 2004 Hyderabad India Risaburo NEZU Fujitsu Research Institute Growth of high- and medium-high-technology exports, annual average growth rate, 1992-2001 or closest available years Japan Italy Switzerland Norway High- Manufacturing Sweden technology France Denmark industries Germany Australia OECD Spain New Zealand United States Korea EU Slovak Republic Austria Portugal United Kingdom Canada Netherlands Belgium Finland Ireland Greece Turkey Mexico Poland Czech Republic Hungary Iceland 40 30 20 10 0 0 10203040 *OECD total excludes Czech Republic, Luxembourg, Korea and Slovak Republic. Czech 93-, Slovak 97-, Korea 94- 1 Source; OECD, STAN database, May 2003. <#> Share of semiconductor in the ％ world market 60 50 40 30 US Japan 20 Europe Asia (Except Japan) 10 0 1 85 87 89 91 93 95 97 99 200 Gartner/Data Quest 2 Japanese position in international trade （％） 14 12 US 10 Canada 8 Mexico 6 Japan Germany 4 China 2 0 '92 '93 '94 '95 '96 '97 '98 '99 '00 '01 '02 Source; US Department of Commerce 3 <#> Value-chain of IT equipments -Integrated approach VS Modular approach - US Fabless (silicon valley) and Foundry (Taiwan) - Japan does everything at home. profitability 【Structure of value chain】 After-sales, R&D, D&D Service, Support Procurement Logistics Manufacturing TIME 4 Source: Nikkei Business July 8, 2002 ComparisonComparison ofof IndustryIndustry StructureStructure (( METI)METI) ・ US and Asia realized high profitability by focusing on the areas of strength ・ Japan marked low profit as it spread its resources to all fields - As a result, Japan was driven into a vicious circle of low investment and poor competitiveness IndustryIndustry structure structure Design Houses Japan USA Asia Semiconductor Intel Samsung TSMC ( foundry ) Hitachi Fujitsu NEC IBM Software Microsoft Computer Sun Microsystems Network cisco Lucent Matsushita Sony Digital Motorola Samsung Appliances 5 <#> Semiconductor product mix (2000) JPN US Europe Korea 100% Mos memory 80% Mi com. Logic 60% Linear 40% Digital CCD 20% OPT 0% Discrete HIC IBM INTEL Fujitsu Micron Hitachi Philips Toshiba Infenion Hyundai ST micro Samsung 6 Source: Semiconductor Industry Research Institute Japan Procurement of components from Taiwan Total of top 10 Total of top 5 $100M Companies Companies 350 300 US 250 US JPN EU 200 150 100 JPN 50 0 EU 95 96 97 98 99 '00 '01 Source:adapted from Ministry of Economic Affairs ( Taiwan ) 7 <#> US Trade in IT products (millions of Dollars) 2001 2002 2003 Exports of goods, balance of payments basis, excluding 718,712 681,874 713,761 military Computers, peripherals, and parts 47,555 38,553 39,928 Semiconductors 45,066 42,235 46,158 Telecommunications equipment 27,874 22,208 20,748 Other office and business machines 2,894 2,023 1,924 Imports of goods, balance of payments basis, excluding 1,145,927 1,164,746 1,263,170 military Computers, peripherals, and parts 74,001 75,150 76,522 Semiconductors 30,422 26,015 24,608 Telecommunications equipment 24,632 23,135 24,766 Other office and business machines 4,864 4,468 7,136 Source; US Department of Commerce 8 Shares in the global server market (2002) HP Dell IBM Sun Microsystems NEC Fujitsu Hitachi Gateway Siemens Solectron Flextronics Acer Quanta Others 2.92.4 the volume of 3.44.4 8 3.4 14.1 87.5 4.6 41.3 shipments 2.2 Brand 31.1 18 15 6.13.4 16.7 2.42.2 2.9 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 9 Source; The Semiconductor Industry News, 26 November, 2003 <#> Shares in the global mobile phone market (2002) Nokia Motorola Samsung Siemens Sony Ericsson LG Electronics Alcatel Panasonic Mobile Communications Kyocera Phillips Others Flextronics Hon-Hai Solectron NEC the volume of 29 5.3 16.7 4.3 6.9 5.3 4.7 11.4 6.4 5.5 4.4 shipments 2.9 2.7 Brand 35.8 15.3 9.9 8.1 5.5 9.8 3.1 2.8 4.1 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 10 Source; The Semiconductor Industry News, 5 November, 2003 MarketMarket reorganizationreorganization inin SemiconductorSemiconductor fieldsfields Memory (DRAM) ＤＲＡＭ Two top companies were integrated into globally competitive System ＬＳＩ one. Others withdrew from the market. (1999) Joint 2002 investment in kind ・Appointing former president ＤＲＡＭ of Japan TI to CEO. (April 2003) transfer of business ・ System ＬＳＩ Investment from Intel System LSI ＤＲＡＭ Withdrawal System ＬＳＩ (November 2002) Partition ＤＲＡＭ Withdrawal Group System ＬＳＩ (April 2003) Jointly Flash memory newly-established firm FUJITSU Semiconductor Division ＡＭＤ Comprehensive Group alliance Toshiba Semiconductor ＤＲＡＭ Withdrawal Company System ＬＳＩ Competitive Projects of Public and Private ( HALCA, MIRAI, ASPLA ） Adapted from METI report 11 <#> Fortune 500 Computer and Office equipment 1982 ( Mainframe ) 1992 ( Mini-Computer ) 2002 ( PC ) 1 IBM IBM IBM 2 Sperry Hewlett-Packard Hewlett-Packard 3 Honeywell Digital Equipment Compaq Computer 4 NCR Unisys Dell Computer 5 Burroughs Apple Computer Sun Microsystems 6 Digital Equipment Pitney Bowes Xerox 7 Control Data Compaq Computer Gateway 8 Pitney Bowes Sun Microsystems NCR 9 Wang Laboratories Seagate Technology Apple Computer 10 Wang Laboratories Pitney Bowes 12 Top 10 Japanese IT companies 1981 2001 Matsushita Hitachi Hitachi Sony Toshiba Matsushita Mitsubishi Electric Toshiba Nihon Electric NEC （Nihon Electric） Sony Fujitsu SANYO Mitsubishi Fujitsu Source; Fortune Global 500, 13 <#> Evolution of IT industry -1995 1995-2000 2000-2003 2004-? Mainframe/ PC/Internet Mobile phone Digital home Minicon (US) (Europe) electronics, PSTN Ubiquitous computing (Japan ?) IBM, ATT, DELL,SUN, NOKIA, Sharp, Sony, Alcatel, CISCO, HP ERICSSON, Matsushita Siemens, NTT, INTEL MOTOROLA, (convergence of Fujitsu, NEC SAMSON AV, computer ST Micro, TI and Telecom) Proprietary OS UNIX, Windows Simbian, TRON ,Linux ? 14 Two opposing views TOYOTA SONY Continuous Improvement 15 <#> Americanization of Toyota Japan North 28% America 34% Latin Total America 6.04million 2% US$ Africa 2003 3% Oceania 4% Asia Europe Middle East excluding 14% 5% Japan 10% 16 Source; Asahi shimbun Smile curves applied to automobile and computer industries Automobile Computer and peripherals 14% 14% 12% 12% 10% 10% 8% 8% 6% 6% 85 4% 85 90 95 4% 90 95 97 99 2002 2% 2% 97 99 0% 0% Materials Fabrication Service Materials Fabrication Service And Parts And Parts produced from input and output table by Fujitsu Research institute 17 <#> 18 Another evidence of “doing 16 (%) 14 as others do” strategy (2001) 12 10 8 6 4 US 2 US 0 Lucent Intel Source Motorola ： Japan Research Industries Association EU IBM EU GE Dell Computer Philips Siemens Japan Abb Asea Brown Boveri Where Japanese strength lies in Sony Fujitsu Matsushita 【 NEC number of parts terms of number of parts Toshiba 1 10 100 1,000 10,000 100,000 1,000,000 Hitachi 【 strength Mitsubishi 【 】 weakness 】 chemical catalyst biotec 18 】 Camera, machine tools, TV, auto Air craft, space OS 19 <#> New product areas Japanese share％ （2000） 80 70 VTR Japanese 60 strength 50 Color TV 40 Japanese 30 weakness 20 PDA Mobile 10 Desktop PC Note PC phone 0 0 10203040506070 2000/1995 growth rates % 20 Number of patents granted in the US (2003) Rank Company No Rank Company No 1 IBM (US) 3,439 11 Samsung (Korea) 1,316 2 Canon(JPN) 1,997 12 Mitsubishi (JPN) 1,265 3 Hitachi (JPN) 1,906 13 Toshiba (JPN) 1,217 4 Matsushita (JPN) 1,821 14 NEC (JPN) 1,198 5 Hewlett-Packard (US) 1,763 15 General Electric (US) 1,139 6 Micron Technology (US) 1,708 16 AMD(US) 908 7 Intel (US) 1,595 17 Fuji Photo Film (JPN) 809 8 Phillips (Holland) 1,355 18 Seiko Epson (JPN) 779 9 Sony (JPN) 1,354 19 TI (US) 771 10 Fujitsu (JPN) 1,338 20 Bosch (Germany) 758 21 Source; Denpa Shimbun January 14, 2004 <#> Share of semiconductor in the world Top 20 2003 Company Name 2003 Revenue (Millions of US$) Percent Change Percent Total Intel 27,036 14.1% 14.9% Samsung Electronics 9,675 10.6% 5.3% Renesas Technology 7,971 NM 4.4% Texas Instruments 7,850 20.2% 4.3% Toshiba 7,571 17.9% 4.2% STMicroelectronics 7,238 13.9% 4.0% Infineon Technologies 7,109 32.3% 3.9% NEC Electronics 5,705 8.7% 3.1% Freecale Semiconductor (Motorola) 4,629 -3.7% 2.5% Philips Semiconductors 4,512 3.5% 2.5% Matsushita Electric 4,016 22.4% 2.2% Advanced Micro Devices ( AMD ) / Spansion 3,939 48.0% 2.2% Sony 3,558 27.5% 2.0% Micron Technology 3,418 18.1% 1.9% Sharp Electronics 3,075 35.6% 1.7% Hynix 3,071 28.4% 1.7% Fujitsu 2,605 -16.0% 1.4% IBM Microelectronics 2,515 -10.4% 1.4% Qualcomm 2,466 27.0% 1.4% Rohm 2,398 1.5% 1.3% Others 61,368 0.5% 33.8% Total Revenue 181,725 14.2% 100.0% Source ：iSuppli Corporation, March 2004 22 World semiconductor market ($billion ) (2002-2007) 250 (CAGR % ) 200 opt (9.7) discrete (6.0) 150 analog (5.9) logic (10.8) 100 MPU (8.4) memory (11.7) 50 0 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Source JEITA 23 <#> The distribution of major electric device- semiconductor market (Forecast) 100,000 consumer electronics ） M$ computer CELLULAR （ DESK TOP PC communication NOTE BOOK PC automobile 10,000 CAR (BODY) CAR(DRIVE) PC SERVER TV GAME DSC CAR(INFO.) LCD MONITOR DVD RECORDER HDD ANALOG TV DIJITAL STB DVD BURNER DIGITAL TV INK-JET MFP DVC AV 1,000 RECEIVER DVD PLAYER LASER MFP INK JET PRINTER DVD-ROM（Comb.） CAR(ELECTRIC) HYBRID CAR LASER BEAM PRINTER Market of semiconductor IP TELEPHONE DVD-ROM CAGR(03-07)=9% PDA (Stand-alone) Themarket sizeof semiconductor of2007 100 -20% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% CAGR ( Compound Annual Growth Rate ) 2003-2007 Source:JEITA, MAY2004 24 Production of key IT products and components Jan-March 2004 change from weight(2000) 2000average Jan-March 2003 Lithium ion battery 41.9 217 123 telecom relay station 5.5 143 51
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ED-7311-20.Pdf
    EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 1 - EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 2 - EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 3 - EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 4 - EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 5 - EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 6 - EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 7 - EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 8 - EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 9 - EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 10 - EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 11 - EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 12 - EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 13 - EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 14 - EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 15 - EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 16 - EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 17 - EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 18 - EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 19 - EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 20 - EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 21 - EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 22 - EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 23 - EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 24 - EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 25 - EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 26 - EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 27 - EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 28 - EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 29 - EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 30 - EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 31 - EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 32 - EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 33 - EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 34 - EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 35 - EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 36 - EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 37 - EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 38 - EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 39 - EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 40 - EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 41 - EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 42 - EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 43 - EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 44 - EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 45 - EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 46 - EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 47 - EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 48 - EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 49 - EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 50 - EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 51 - EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 52 - EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 53 - EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 54 - EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 55 - EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 56 - EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 57 - EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 58 - EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 59 - EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 60 - EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 61 - EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 62 - EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 63 - EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 64 - EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 65 - EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 66 - EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 67 - EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 68 - EIAJ
    [Show full text]
  • FY2008 Results Meeting
    FY200FY20088 ResultsResults MeetingMeeting FY2008 : Year ended March 31, 2009 May 14, 2009 Ryosan Company, Limited Code : 8140 / Stock listings: Tokyo Stock Exchange (First Section) URL : http://www.ryosan.co.jp/eng/ Notice This presentation contains forward-looking statements regarding business performance, which may differ substantially from actual results, depending on certain risks and uncertainties, the most significant of which are listed below. z Economic conditions in key markets (Japan and the rest of Asia), rapid changes in consumption patterns and supply-demand balance for products z Sharp fluctuations in the ¥/$ exchange rate z Substantial fluctuation in prices in capital markets Consolidated results for FY 2008 FY2007 FY2008 FY2009(Forecasts) Of Total Of Total % Chg. YoY Of Total % Chg. YoY ¥ 100 million％ ¥ 100 million％％ ¥ 100 million ％％ Net sales 2,860 2,208 (22.8) 1,700 (23.0) Gross margin 251 8.8 196 8.9 (22.1) 149 8.8 (24.1) SG&A expenses 144 5.0 134 6.1 (6.8) 115 6.8 (14.7) Operating income 107 3.8 61 2.8 (42.8) 34 2.0 (44.7) Ordinary income 112 3.9 72 3.3 (35.6) 38 2.2 (47.7) Net income 67 2.4 39 1.8 (41.8) 22 1.3 (43.9) Earnings per share ¥187.15 ¥111.83 (¥75) ¥63.83 (¥48) 1 Segment results for FY2008 Unit : ¥ 100 million FY2007 FY2008 FY2009(Forecasts) OP OP OP Margin Margin % Chg. YoYMargin % Chg. YoY ％ ％ Sales 1,489 1,169 (21.5) 808 (30.9) Semiconductors Operating income 724.9% 48 4.2%(32.7) 28 3.5% (42.7) Electronic Sales 1,031 759 (26.4) 584 (23.1) Components Operating income 444.3 28 3.7 (35.9) 22 3.8 (22.1)
    [Show full text]
  • 1332:Xtks Nippon Suisan Kaisha Ltd 3 4 1 1334:Xtks Maruha Nichiro Holdings Inc. 3 4 1 1377:Xtks Sakata Seed Corp. 3 5 2 1414:Xtks SHO-BOND Holdings Co
    Symbol Code Description Current Rating New rating Diff 1332:xtks Nippon Suisan Kaisha Ltd 3 4 1 1334:xtks Maruha Nichiro Holdings Inc. 3 4 1 1377:xtks Sakata Seed Corp. 3 5 2 1414:xtks SHO-BOND Holdings Co. Ltd 3 6 3 1766:xtks TOKEN Corp. 3 6 3 1801:xtks Taisei Corp. 3 5 2 1803:xtks Shimizu Corp. 3 4 1 1808:xtks Haseko Corp. 3 4 1 1812:xtks Kajima Corp. 3 5 2 1820:xtks Nishimatsu Construction Co. Ltd 3 6 3 1824:xtks Maeda Corp. 3 6 3 1833:xtks Okumura Corp. 3 6 3 1860:xtks Toda Corp. 3 5 2 1861:xtks Kumagai Gumi Co. Ltd 3 8 5 1865:xtks Asunaro Aoki Construction Co. Ltd 3 6 3 1870:xtks Yahagi Construction Co. Ltd 3 4 1 1881:xtks NIPPO Corp. 3 6 3 1883:xtks Maeda Road Construction Co. Ltd 3 6 3 1911:xtks Sumitomo Forestry Co Ltd 3 4 1 1924:xtks PanaHome Corp. 3 4 1 1925:xtks Daiwa House Industry Co. Ltd 3 4 1 1928:xtks Sekisui House Ltd 3 4 1 1934:xtks YURTEC Corp. 3 6 3 1945:xtks Tokyo Energy & Systems Inc. 3 4 1 1961:xtks Sanki Engineering Co. Ltd 3 4 1 1963:xtks JGC Corporation 3 4 1 1968:xtks Taihei Dengyo Kaisha Ltd 3 4 1 1969:xtks Takasago Thermal Engineering Co. Ltd 3 4 1 1973:xtks NEC Networks & System Integration Corp. 3 5 2 1979:xtks Taikisha Ltd 3 4 1 1983:xtks TOSHIBA PLANT SYSTEMS & SERVICES Corp.
    [Show full text]
  • UNO Template
    01 July 2013 Global Securities Research & Analytics Yen and You Connections Series The competitive edge Figure 1: Yen 'normalisation'—only halfway there 160 USDJPY Average 1990-2008 Forecast 150 140 130 120 110 100 The Credit Suisse Connections Series 90 leverages our exceptional breadth of 80 macro and micro research to deliver 70 incisive cross-sector and cross-border 1990 1992 1994 1997 1999 2001 2004 2006 2008 2011 2013 thematic insights for our clients. Source: Credit Suisse Commodities research, the BLOOMBERG PROFESSIONAL™ service The impact on competitiveness: Our global Yen and You series has been SECURITIES RESEARCH & ANALYTICS examining themes stemming from the 'shock therapy' the Bank of Japan Please see inside for contributors to each section initiated earlier this year. In a parallel report published today (Global Equity Strategy - Japan: The sun is still rising), our Global Equity Strategy team revisit their overweight stance on Japanese equities. Here we focus on a key component of that view—a structurally weak yen (our FX team has a 12-month target of JPY120/USD1) and the resulting competitiveness issues. The significance of this theme is underlined by Japan's wide range of high value-add industry segments—starkly highlighted by Fukushima and the 2011 tsunami. Alongside the work of our analysts and strategists, we leverage our proprietary PEERs supply chain framework to highlight company-specific competition. The added topical relevance of this is the number of 'head-to- heads' with the current embattled emerging markets. This report analyses the relative sensitivity within key tradeable sectors such as technology, autos, steel and capital goods.
    [Show full text]
  • Division of Investment Department of the Treasury State of New Jersey Pension Fund June 30, 2009 and 2008 (With Independent Auditors’ Report Thereon)
    F INANCIAL S TATEMENTS, M ANAGEMENT’ S D ISCUSSION AND A NALYSIS AND S UPPLEMENTAL S CHEDULES Division of Investment Department of the Treasury State of New Jersey Pension Fund June 30, 2009 and 2008 (With Independent Auditors’ Report Thereon) Division of Investment Department of the Treasury State of New Jersey Pension Fund Financial Statements June 30, 2009 and 2008 Contents Independent Auditors’ Report ..........................................................................................................1 Management’s Discussion and Analysis .........................................................................................3 Basic Financial Statements: Statements of Net Assets .................................................................................................................7 Statements of Changes in Net Assets...............................................................................................8 Notes to Financial Statements ..........................................................................................................9 Supplemental Schedules: Schedule 1 – Combining Schedule of Net Assets ..........................................................................31 Schedule 2 – Combining Schedule of Changes in Net Assets .......................................................32 Schedule 3 – Portfolio of Investments – Common Fund A ...........................................................33 Schedule 4 – Portfolio of Investments – Common Fund B ...........................................................57
    [Show full text]
  • Delaware, 1:11-Cv-00770
    IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE HSM PORTFOLIO LLC AND § TECHNOLOGY PROPERTIES § LIMITED LLC, § § Plaintiffs, § § v. § C.A. No. 1:11-cv-00770-RGA § FUJITSU LIMITED, § JURY TRIAL DEMANDED FUJITSU AMERICA, INC., § FUJITSU SEMICONDUCTOR § AMERICA, INC., § § ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC., § § QUALCOMM INCORPORATED, § § ELPIDA MEMORY, INC., § ELPIDA MEMORY (USA) INC., § § SK HYNIX INC., § SK HYNIX AMERICA INC., § HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR § MANUFACTURING AMERICA INC., § § MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC., § § PROMOS TECHNOLOGIES INC., § § SANDISK CORPORATION, § § SONY CORPORATION, § SONY CORPORATION OF AMERICA, § SONY ELECTRONICS INC., § SONY COMPUTER § ENTERTAINMENT INC., § SONY COMPUTER § ENTERTAINMENT AMERICA LLC, § § STMICROELECTRONICS N.V., § STMICROELECTRONICS, INC., § § PAGE 1 TOSHIBA CORPORATION, § TOSHIBA AMERICA, INC., § TOSHIBA AMERICA ELECTRONIC § COMPONENTS, INC., § § ON SEMICONDUCTOR § CORPORATION, § § ZORAN CORPORATION, § § Defendants. § PLAINTIFFS’ THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT Plaintiffs HSM Portfolio LLC and Technology Properties Limited LLC (collectively “Plaintiffs”) by and through their undersigned counsel, file this Third Amended Complaint against Defendants Fujitsu Limited, Fujitsu America, Inc., Fujitsu Semiconductor America, Inc. (collectively “Fujitsu”), Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (“AMD”), Qualcomm Incorporated (“Qualcomm”), Elpida Memory, Inc., Elpida Memory (USA) Inc. (collectively “Elpida”),1 SK Hynix Inc., SK Hynix America Inc., Hynix Semiconductor Manufacturing America Inc. (collectively “SK Hynix”),
    [Show full text]
  • 2008 International Symposium on Semiconductor Manufacturing
    2008 International Symposium on Semiconductor Manufacturing (ISSM 2008) Tokyo, Japan 27 – 29 October 2008 IEEE Catalog Number: CFP08SSM-PRT ISBN: 978-1-61284-948-5 ISSM 2008 Program Schedule The 1st day (Monday, October 27) Tutorial Session Room: Century A/B 9:30 Tutorial Session AEC/APC Introduction of AEC/APC's history Mr. Toshihiko Osada, Senior Manager, Fujitsu Microelectronics Limited Manufacturing engineering and AEC/APC Mr. Kensuke Uriga, CEO/President, Dura Systems Corporation Application of control theory for AEC/APC in semiconductor fabrication Mr. Hiroshi Shimizu, Director/Advanced Solution Department, Advance Automation Company, Yamatake Corporation 9:00 Tutorial Session ESH SUSTAINABILITY AND ESH ASPECTS OF ADVANCED SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING Prof. Farhang Shadman, Regents Professor of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, the University of Arizona Opening Remarks Room: Century 13:00 Keynote Speech Session Room: Century 13:20 Challenges in The DRAM Business Mr.Yukio Sakamoto, President&CEO, Elpida Memory,Inc. 14:10 The New Dynamics of Semiconductor Industry Dr. Tien Wu, Chief Operating Officer, Board of Directors, Advanced Semiconductor Engineering Inc.(ASE) 15:00 Break Oral Session Room: Century A Highlight Session <Advanced Lithography Session> 15:10 PE-O-097 Phenomenology of ArF Photoresist Shrinkage Trends ..........................................................3 Benjamin Bunday, ISMI 15:30 PE-O-044 Lithography Hotspot Discovery at 70nm DRAM 300mm Fab : Process Window Qualification Using Design Based Binning...............................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • Top 300 Organizations Granted U.S. Patents in 2007
    Top 300 Organizations Granted U.S. Patents in 2007 NOTE: IPO DOES NOT INTEND TO ENCOURAGE MORE PATENTING IN U.S. This annual report listing the organizations that received the most U.S. utility patents is being published by fO kramedarT & tnetaP .S.U eht morf deniatbo atad no desab si tI .raey evitucesnoc ht52 eht rof OPI rof eht ht52 evitucesnoc .raey tI si desab no atad deniatbo morf eht .S.U tnetaP & kramedarT fO fi .ec Patents granted to parent and subsidiary companies are combined in some instances. See the end notes for background on how the report was prepared. IPO does not intend for this report to encourage or discourage patenting. Some critics believe companies are applying for too many patents. In 2007 the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office announced that it would no longer publish its own report on organizations receiving the most patents, because it wanted to discour- age “any perception that we believe more is better.” IPO has opted to continue publishing this IPO report, however, because the number of patents granted is one of the few objective measures of the patent system as a whole and the patenting activities of individual industries and companies. IPO and others are study- ing ways to develop more reliable measures of patent quality. May 21, 2008 Contents: Numerical Listing . 2 Alphabetical Listing . 6 Notes . 10 © Copyright 2008 Intellectual Property Owners Association 1 2007 Patent Owners Numerical Listing Rank Organization Patent Rank Organization Patent 1 International Business Machines Corp. 3,125 45 Sanyo Electric Co., Ltd. 454 2 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • Respondents(Eng)
    JCGR JCGIndex Survey 2008 List of 252 responding firms Mining （1） House Foods Corporation (03)(05)(06) INPEX Corporation (07) (07) Nichirei Corporation (02)(03)(04)(05)(06) Construction （13） (07) Taisei Corporation (05)(06)(07) Fujicco Co., Ltd. ((07) OBAYASHI CORPORATION (04)(05)(06) (07) Textiles & Apparel （6） HASEKO Corporation Gunze Limited (02)(03)(04)(05)(06)(07) KAJIMA Corporation Japan Wool Textile Co., Ltd. (04)(05) Maeda Corporation (02)(03)(04)(05)(06) (06)(07) (07) Teijin Limited (03)(04)(05)(06)(07) Totetsu Kogyo Co., Ltd. (04)(05)(06)(07) Toray Industries, Inc. (03)(05)(06) TOA CORPORATION Japan Vilene Company, Ltd. (05)(07) Daiwa House Industry Co., Ltd. (05)(06) Wacoal Holdings Corp. (02)(04)(05)(06) (07) (07) Sekisui House, Ltd. (05)(06)(07) Nippon Densetsu Kogyo Co., Ltd. (04) Pulp and Paper （2） (05)(07) Rengo Co., Ltd. (02)(04)(05)(06)(07) Takasago Thermal Engineering Co., Ltd. The Pack Corporation (06) DAI-DAN Co., Ltd. (04)(05)(06) Chemicals （20） Toyo Engineering Corporation Asahi Kasei Corporation (05)(06)(07) Showa Denko K.K (04)(05)(06)(07) Foods （10） Nippon Soda Co., Ltd. (03)(04)(05)(06) Morozoff Limited (07) (07) NH Foods Ltd. (04)(05)(06)(07) Tokuyama Corpo (02)(04)(05)(06)(07) Asahi Breweries, Ltd. (02)(03)(04)(05) Kanto Denka Kogyo Co., Ltd. (04)(05)(06) (06)(07) (07) The Nisshin OilliO Group, Ltd. (05)(06) Shin-Etsu Chemical Co., Ltd. (05)(06) (07) Mitsubishi Chemical Holdings Fuji Oil Co., Ltd. (03)(04) Corporation (04)(05)(06) Kikkoman Corporation (07) JSR Corporation (04)(05)(06)(07) Ajinomoto Co., Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Green Fab1—Requirements for a Good Semiconductor Factory
    HIGHLIGHT Roundtable Meeting with Stakeholders Green Fab1—Requirements for a Good Semiconductor Factory On June 27, 2007, we invited some of our stakeholders to a roundtable meeting to discuss the requirements for a good semiconductor factory. Specifically, we invited representatives of the fol- lowing companies engaged in the upstream and downstream semiconductor manufacturing processes: semiconductor manufacturers, relevant equipment and component manufacturers, and a company engaged in the design and construction of clean rooms. 1. Green Fab: Meaning a factory/manufacturing process that is comprehensively environment-conscious Collaboration from the Upstream through manufacturers. However, when we have the rare opportunity to visit Downstream Processes Is Essential the factory of a semiconductor manufacturer, we often find room Mr. Honma: I would like to comment in my capacity as someone for improvement at the factory, something which only component engaged in building semiconductor factories and production manufacturers would be able to see. For example, the pipe on a systems. As a result of the shift from 200-millimeter wafers to 300- freezer might be too long and coiled up. Although the freezer is millimeter wafers, the power consumed by semiconductor produc- working hard to keep the temperature below zero, the long pipe is tion equipment is increasing, and we are now required to save even continuously giving out heat beside the freezer. Reducing this type more energy. For the environment, it is important to eliminate of waste would help reduce the environmental impact of the factory, HIGHLIGHT duplication and waste in semiconductor factories from a compre- and roundtable meetings like this one are very useful for this hensive viewpoint, but the environmental efficiency of individual purpose.
    [Show full text]
  • News Release
    News Release INCJ Announces Appointment of CEO of Japan Display TOKYO, November 15, 2011—Innovation Network Corporation Japan (“INCJ”) announced today the appointment of Shuichi Otsuka as CEO of Japan Display Inc. (“Japan Display”), a new company scheduled for establishment in Spring of 2012 that will specialize in the development and production of small- and medium-sized displays for the global market. Japan Display is being formed through the integration of display businesses currently being operated by subsidiaries of Hitachi, Sony and Toshiba, with capital backing and management control by INCJ. Shuichi Otsuka will formally assume the position of CEO following completion of the required procedures, until which time he will maintain his present role as a senior advisor to the INCJ engaged in preparations for the launch of Japan Display. Background of Shuichi Otsuka 1980 Joined Texas Instruments Japan K.K. 1998 Joined Sony Corporation 2002 Joined Elpida Memory, Inc. 2004 Appointed COO, Elpida Memory, Inc. 2011 Resigned as director, Elpida Memory, Inc. Appointed CEO, Japan Display Inc. (designated) Comments on leadership announcement Shuichi Otsuka, CEO (designated), Japan Display Inc. “All of us participating in this integration have a shared sense of its significance and a strong determination to ensure that it succeeds. I see it as my mission to channel that ambition, through decisive leadership from a neutral and balanced perspective, to develop Japan Display into a world leader in small- and medium-sized displays.” Kimikazu Noumi, CEO, Innovation Network Corporation Japan “Shuichi Otsuka has extensive experience in developing cutting-edge technology and making major investment decisions at global corporations.
    [Show full text]
  • STATEMENT of INVESTMENTS Dreyfus Premier Total Return Advantage Fund July 31, 2007 (Unaudited)
    STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS Dreyfus Premier Total Return Advantage Fund July 31, 2007 (Unaudited) Coupon Maturity Principal Bonds and Notes--103.6% Rate (%) Date Amount ($) Value ($) Asset-Backed Ctfs./Auto Receivables--4.6% Capital One Auto Finance Trust, Ser. 2005-C, Cl. A3 4.61 7/15/10 57,941 57,806 Chase Manhattan Auto Owner Trust, Ser. 2003-C, Cl. A4 2.94 6/15/10 47,229 47,018 Daimler Chrysler Auto Trust, Ser. 2004-A, Cl. A4 2.58 4/8/09 40,568 40,391 Harley-Davidson Motorcycle Trust, Ser. 2004-1, Cl. A2 2.53 11/15/11 58,861 57,503 Honda Auto Receivables Owner Trust, Ser. 2005-5, Cl. A4 4.69 2/15/11 140,000 139,153 Household Automotive Trust, Ser. 2003-2, Cl. A4 3.02 12/17/10 49,853 49,489 USAA Auto Owner Trust, Ser. 2004-3, Cl. A4 3.53 6/15/11 100,000 98,865 WFS Financial Owner Trust, Ser. 2004-2, Cl. A4 3.54 11/21/11 62,435 61,869 552,094 Asset-Backed Ctfs./Credit Cards--3.3% Capital One Multi-Asset Execution Trust, Ser. 2005-A2, Cl. A2 4.05 2/15/11 100,000 99,216 Chase Issuance Trust, Ser. 2005-A10, Cl. A10 4.65 12/17/12 100,000 98,732 Citibank Credit Card Issuance Trust, Ser. 2003-A8, Cl. A8 3.50 8/16/10 100,000 98,317 MBNA Master Credit Card Trust, Ser. 2000-L, Cl. A 6.50 4/15/10 100,000 100,382 396,647 Asset-Backed Ctfs./Home Equity Loans--2.5% MASTR Asset-Backed Securities Trust, Ser.
    [Show full text]