UNO Template

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

UNO Template 01 July 2013 Global Securities Research & Analytics Yen and You Connections Series The competitive edge Figure 1: Yen 'normalisation'—only halfway there 160 USDJPY Average 1990-2008 Forecast 150 140 130 120 110 100 The Credit Suisse Connections Series 90 leverages our exceptional breadth of 80 macro and micro research to deliver 70 incisive cross-sector and cross-border 1990 1992 1994 1997 1999 2001 2004 2006 2008 2011 2013 thematic insights for our clients. Source: Credit Suisse Commodities research, the BLOOMBERG PROFESSIONAL™ service The impact on competitiveness: Our global Yen and You series has been SECURITIES RESEARCH & ANALYTICS examining themes stemming from the 'shock therapy' the Bank of Japan Please see inside for contributors to each section initiated earlier this year. In a parallel report published today (Global Equity Strategy - Japan: The sun is still rising), our Global Equity Strategy team revisit their overweight stance on Japanese equities. Here we focus on a key component of that view—a structurally weak yen (our FX team has a 12-month target of JPY120/USD1) and the resulting competitiveness issues. The significance of this theme is underlined by Japan's wide range of high value-add industry segments—starkly highlighted by Fukushima and the 2011 tsunami. Alongside the work of our analysts and strategists, we leverage our proprietary PEERs supply chain framework to highlight company-specific competition. The added topical relevance of this is the number of 'head-to- heads' with the current embattled emerging markets. This report analyses the relative sensitivity within key tradeable sectors such as technology, autos, steel and capital goods. A common theme that emerges is that markets (and consensus forecasts) may have moved to discount price effects but rarely potential market share shifts—we fear a degree of complacency. Few non-Japanese companies seem to think a price threat will emerge at all, but that is not how devaluations typically work. We also highlight airlines which, while not a pure competitiveness story, display leverage to the currency and also a read-through to the impact the currency is having from a trade perspective. The early evidence already suggests a material impact. DISCLOSURE APPENDIX CONTAINS IMPORTANT DISCLOSURES, ANALYST CERTIFICATIONS, INFORMATION ON TRADE ALERTS, ANALYST MODEL PORTFOLIOS AND THE STATUS OF NON-U.S ANALYSTS. FOR OTHER IMPORTANT DISCLOSURES, visit www.creditsuisse.com/researchdisclosures or call +1 (877) 291-2683 for Credit Suisse Equity Research disclosures and visit https://firesearchdisclosure.credit-suisse.com or call +1 (212) 538- 7625 for Credit Suisse Fixed Income Research disclosures. US Disclosure: Credit Suisse does and seeks to do business with companies covered in its research reports. As a result, investors should be aware that the Firm may have a conflict of interest that could affect the objectivity of this report. Investors should consider this report as only a single factor in making their investment decision. CREDIT SUISSE SECURITIES RESEARCH & ANALYTICS BEYOND INFORMATION® Client-Driven Solutions, Insights, and Access 01 July 2013 Table of Contents Related research 3 Key charts 4 Executive summary 5 Key stocks 7 Global competitors and suppliers 10 FX Strategy: The yen—the macro story 12 Japan Economics: Why we expect USDJPY to hit 120 in 12 months 13 Global Equity Strategy 15 Equity Research: Global Technology 24 Key global takeaways 24 Japan: A major player across the tech supply chain 25 Global semis: Revenue, cost, and competitive Implications 32 Yen move does not seem to be fully in consensus numbers 35 Impact on US tech hardware names—focus on printing 38 Impact on European tech hardware names 39 Equity Research: Global Autos 43 Key global takeaways 43 Japanese point of view: Weaker yen to trigger virtuous cycle 44 US: The weak yen is only one factor 46 The European story 50 Japan vs. Korea? 54 A closer look at India 55 Equity Research: Steel 59 Key global takeaways 59 Japan in the context of Global steel 62 Japan’s key products 65 Empirical evidence – a mixed picture 66 The Asia landscape 73 Equity Research: Global Industrials 84 Key global takeaways 84 Perspective on Japanese industrials 84 Implications outside Japan 88 What are the key end markets? 90 A focus on Chinese industrials 92 Equity Research: Airlines 97 Key global takeaways 97 Inbound vs Outbound drivers 97 Appendix 1 – PEERs Relationships 104 Appendix 2 – FX forecasts 110 Yen and You 2 01 July 2013 Related research Cross-Asset Bank of Japan’s shock therapy: Impact on flows across asset classes, 1 May 2013 Economics New BOJ but old fashioned QE, 4 April 2013 The BOJ’s new measure: negative real interest rate shock therapy?, 5 April 2013 Bank of Japan widens its lead on innovation, 8 April 2013 Three years to go for CPI to rise +2%, but…, 11 April 2013 A monetary shock and the Japanese economy, 23 April 2013 Should we worry about rising long-term interest rates?, 16 May 2013 Zero-inflation output gap would turn positive around the middle of this year, 28 May 2013 Will the third arrow of Abenomics be encouraging?, 31 May 2013 Pulse of Global Industry: Further confirmation of tepid growth outlook, 26 June 2013 FX Strategy Bank of Japan "Shock And Awe ...", 4 April 2013 Japanese portfolio flow monitor, 16 May 2013 FX Compass: The Yen Trend is Still Your Friend, 5 June 2013 Equity Research Global Equity Strategy - Japan: add to overweight and implications, 16 April 2013 Global Equity Strategy - Only a mild slowdown: become more cyclical, 17 May 2013 Global Themes: Thematic Trade Ideas - Spring - Policy plays, 13 May 2013 Asia Technology Strategy: Yen and you: What JPY move means for the tech sector, 20 May 2013 Asia Steel Sector: Yen and you: How a falling Yen impacts Asian steel companies, 8 May 2013 Global Industrials: Push by Japan, China into 3D printing; more competition in industrial automation software, 3 June 2013 Global Industrials: More signs of Japanese manufacturing renaissance; rising competition in industrial automation, but bottoming demand, 28 May 2013 Global Automotive Sector: Weak Yen Is One Factor in Price/Share Equation; Nissan Looks Well Positioned, 25 February 2013 Japan Auto Sector; Weak Yen changing global outlook, 21 January 2013 Bridgestone: Yen weakness to boost competitiveness, also market share, 9 April 2013 Korea Auto Sector: JPYUSD – Where is the price war?, 3 May 2013 Yen and You 3 01 July 2013 Key charts Figure 2: Yen 'normalisation'— We forecast a rate of ¥ / $ Figure 3: We believe the market is not fully building in the of 120, which would be nearer to the 20-year average. We impact of currency on earnings - OP for some tech stocks currently stand some way from that level. should have been revised up by 30-60% in our estimates 10 8 6 4 2 0 -2 -4 160 USDJPY-6 Average 1990-2008 Forecast 150 -8 140 -10 Jul-10 Jul-11 Jul-12 Oct-11 Apr-10 Oct-10 Apr-11 Apr-12 Oct-12 Apr-13 Jan-11 Jan-12 Jan-13 130 Jan-10 120 MSCI Japan Tech:1M change (%) in 12M Fwd EPS Source: Thomson Reuters, Credit Suisse Equity Research110 Source: Company data, Credit Suisse Equity Research estimates 100 Figure 4: Japanese OEMs have taken steps to mitigate Figure 5: The inverse relationship between currency and 90 Yen exposure by increasing ‘local’ capacity & restricting travel demand has been intensifying for the past year – 80 component sourcing - 66% of Honda’s N America sourced bad news for Japanese airlines, but good for foreign 70 vehicles contain components from the region1990 itself 1992 1994carriers1997 with1999 exposures2001 to2004 that market2006 2008 2011 2013 80% 50% 25% 70% 70% 66% 20% 70% 62% 40% 59% 59% 15% 60% 30% 49% 10% 50% 20% 5% 40% 10% 0% -5% 30% 0% 20% -10% 20% -10% -15% 10% -20% -20% 0% -30% -25% Honda Nissan Toyota FHI Jan-05 Sep-05 May-06 Jan-07 Sep-07 May-08 Jan-09 Sep-09 May-10 Jan-11 Sep-11 May-12 Jan-13 2007 2012 Japanese outbound passengers YoY% JPY/USD YoY% Source: Company data, Credit Suisse Equity Research estimates Source: Thomson Reuters, Credit Suisse Equity Research estimates Figure 6: Companies whose Japanese competitors have a Figure 7: Whether the impact of weaker currency is a high global market share and a substantial share of price or cost advantage, Japanese steel exporters should production domiciled in Japan are set to suffer the most see an improved position on the cost curve globally 60% 1000 THK 900 50% Nabtesco 90% Daikin 800 40% Fanuc 80% Tsubakimoto 700 Chain 30% SMC Amada 600 Komatsu HCM Yaskawa Global Market ShareMarket Global 20% Makita 500 Electric Mitsubishi Kubota Heavy NTN NSK 10% 400 Ebara JTEKT Okuma Mori Seiki 300 0% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 120% 200 Domestic Production Ratio 1.0 6.3 11.3 18.4 22.8 32.0 39.2 44.5 48.1 54.1 59.9 63.8 67.9 71.7 78.8 84.5 91.9 96.4 99.3 Source: Company data, Credit Suisse Equity Research estimates Source: Company data, Credit Suisse Equity Research estimates Yen and You 4 01 July 2013 Executive summary A structurally weak yen is a core view of our Japanese Economics and Global Foreign Richard Kersley Exchange teams as the BoJ seeks to raise inflation expectations. As the previously highly Head of Global Research profitable long Nikkei/short yen trade became June’s pain trade, this view looked more Product and Thematic questionable. However, post the signalling of the direction of US money policy emerging Research from the latest FOMC, nearer term news provides added relevance to our structural story.
Recommended publications
  • ED-7311-20.Pdf
    EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 1 - EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 2 - EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 3 - EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 4 - EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 5 - EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 6 - EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 7 - EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 8 - EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 9 - EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 10 - EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 11 - EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 12 - EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 13 - EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 14 - EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 15 - EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 16 - EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 17 - EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 18 - EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 19 - EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 20 - EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 21 - EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 22 - EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 23 - EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 24 - EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 25 - EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 26 - EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 27 - EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 28 - EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 29 - EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 30 - EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 31 - EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 32 - EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 33 - EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 34 - EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 35 - EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 36 - EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 37 - EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 38 - EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 39 - EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 40 - EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 41 - EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 42 - EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 43 - EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 44 - EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 45 - EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 46 - EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 47 - EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 48 - EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 49 - EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 50 - EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 51 - EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 52 - EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 53 - EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 54 - EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 55 - EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 56 - EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 57 - EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 58 - EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 59 - EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 60 - EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 61 - EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 62 - EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 63 - EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 64 - EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 65 - EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 66 - EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 67 - EIAJ ED-7311-20 - 68 - EIAJ
    [Show full text]
  • FY2008 Results Meeting
    FY200FY20088 ResultsResults MeetingMeeting FY2008 : Year ended March 31, 2009 May 14, 2009 Ryosan Company, Limited Code : 8140 / Stock listings: Tokyo Stock Exchange (First Section) URL : http://www.ryosan.co.jp/eng/ Notice This presentation contains forward-looking statements regarding business performance, which may differ substantially from actual results, depending on certain risks and uncertainties, the most significant of which are listed below. z Economic conditions in key markets (Japan and the rest of Asia), rapid changes in consumption patterns and supply-demand balance for products z Sharp fluctuations in the ¥/$ exchange rate z Substantial fluctuation in prices in capital markets Consolidated results for FY 2008 FY2007 FY2008 FY2009(Forecasts) Of Total Of Total % Chg. YoY Of Total % Chg. YoY ¥ 100 million% ¥ 100 million%% ¥ 100 million %% Net sales 2,860 2,208 (22.8) 1,700 (23.0) Gross margin 251 8.8 196 8.9 (22.1) 149 8.8 (24.1) SG&A expenses 144 5.0 134 6.1 (6.8) 115 6.8 (14.7) Operating income 107 3.8 61 2.8 (42.8) 34 2.0 (44.7) Ordinary income 112 3.9 72 3.3 (35.6) 38 2.2 (47.7) Net income 67 2.4 39 1.8 (41.8) 22 1.3 (43.9) Earnings per share ¥187.15 ¥111.83 (¥75) ¥63.83 (¥48) 1 Segment results for FY2008 Unit : ¥ 100 million FY2007 FY2008 FY2009(Forecasts) OP OP OP Margin Margin % Chg. YoYMargin % Chg. YoY % % Sales 1,489 1,169 (21.5) 808 (30.9) Semiconductors Operating income 724.9% 48 4.2%(32.7) 28 3.5% (42.7) Electronic Sales 1,031 759 (26.4) 584 (23.1) Components Operating income 444.3 28 3.7 (35.9) 22 3.8 (22.1)
    [Show full text]
  • 1332:Xtks Nippon Suisan Kaisha Ltd 3 4 1 1334:Xtks Maruha Nichiro Holdings Inc. 3 4 1 1377:Xtks Sakata Seed Corp. 3 5 2 1414:Xtks SHO-BOND Holdings Co
    Symbol Code Description Current Rating New rating Diff 1332:xtks Nippon Suisan Kaisha Ltd 3 4 1 1334:xtks Maruha Nichiro Holdings Inc. 3 4 1 1377:xtks Sakata Seed Corp. 3 5 2 1414:xtks SHO-BOND Holdings Co. Ltd 3 6 3 1766:xtks TOKEN Corp. 3 6 3 1801:xtks Taisei Corp. 3 5 2 1803:xtks Shimizu Corp. 3 4 1 1808:xtks Haseko Corp. 3 4 1 1812:xtks Kajima Corp. 3 5 2 1820:xtks Nishimatsu Construction Co. Ltd 3 6 3 1824:xtks Maeda Corp. 3 6 3 1833:xtks Okumura Corp. 3 6 3 1860:xtks Toda Corp. 3 5 2 1861:xtks Kumagai Gumi Co. Ltd 3 8 5 1865:xtks Asunaro Aoki Construction Co. Ltd 3 6 3 1870:xtks Yahagi Construction Co. Ltd 3 4 1 1881:xtks NIPPO Corp. 3 6 3 1883:xtks Maeda Road Construction Co. Ltd 3 6 3 1911:xtks Sumitomo Forestry Co Ltd 3 4 1 1924:xtks PanaHome Corp. 3 4 1 1925:xtks Daiwa House Industry Co. Ltd 3 4 1 1928:xtks Sekisui House Ltd 3 4 1 1934:xtks YURTEC Corp. 3 6 3 1945:xtks Tokyo Energy & Systems Inc. 3 4 1 1961:xtks Sanki Engineering Co. Ltd 3 4 1 1963:xtks JGC Corporation 3 4 1 1968:xtks Taihei Dengyo Kaisha Ltd 3 4 1 1969:xtks Takasago Thermal Engineering Co. Ltd 3 4 1 1973:xtks NEC Networks & System Integration Corp. 3 5 2 1979:xtks Taikisha Ltd 3 4 1 1983:xtks TOSHIBA PLANT SYSTEMS & SERVICES Corp.
    [Show full text]
  • Division of Investment Department of the Treasury State of New Jersey Pension Fund June 30, 2009 and 2008 (With Independent Auditors’ Report Thereon)
    F INANCIAL S TATEMENTS, M ANAGEMENT’ S D ISCUSSION AND A NALYSIS AND S UPPLEMENTAL S CHEDULES Division of Investment Department of the Treasury State of New Jersey Pension Fund June 30, 2009 and 2008 (With Independent Auditors’ Report Thereon) Division of Investment Department of the Treasury State of New Jersey Pension Fund Financial Statements June 30, 2009 and 2008 Contents Independent Auditors’ Report ..........................................................................................................1 Management’s Discussion and Analysis .........................................................................................3 Basic Financial Statements: Statements of Net Assets .................................................................................................................7 Statements of Changes in Net Assets...............................................................................................8 Notes to Financial Statements ..........................................................................................................9 Supplemental Schedules: Schedule 1 – Combining Schedule of Net Assets ..........................................................................31 Schedule 2 – Combining Schedule of Changes in Net Assets .......................................................32 Schedule 3 – Portfolio of Investments – Common Fund A ...........................................................33 Schedule 4 – Portfolio of Investments – Common Fund B ...........................................................57
    [Show full text]
  • Delaware, 1:11-Cv-00770
    IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE HSM PORTFOLIO LLC AND § TECHNOLOGY PROPERTIES § LIMITED LLC, § § Plaintiffs, § § v. § C.A. No. 1:11-cv-00770-RGA § FUJITSU LIMITED, § JURY TRIAL DEMANDED FUJITSU AMERICA, INC., § FUJITSU SEMICONDUCTOR § AMERICA, INC., § § ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC., § § QUALCOMM INCORPORATED, § § ELPIDA MEMORY, INC., § ELPIDA MEMORY (USA) INC., § § SK HYNIX INC., § SK HYNIX AMERICA INC., § HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR § MANUFACTURING AMERICA INC., § § MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC., § § PROMOS TECHNOLOGIES INC., § § SANDISK CORPORATION, § § SONY CORPORATION, § SONY CORPORATION OF AMERICA, § SONY ELECTRONICS INC., § SONY COMPUTER § ENTERTAINMENT INC., § SONY COMPUTER § ENTERTAINMENT AMERICA LLC, § § STMICROELECTRONICS N.V., § STMICROELECTRONICS, INC., § § PAGE 1 TOSHIBA CORPORATION, § TOSHIBA AMERICA, INC., § TOSHIBA AMERICA ELECTRONIC § COMPONENTS, INC., § § ON SEMICONDUCTOR § CORPORATION, § § ZORAN CORPORATION, § § Defendants. § PLAINTIFFS’ THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT Plaintiffs HSM Portfolio LLC and Technology Properties Limited LLC (collectively “Plaintiffs”) by and through their undersigned counsel, file this Third Amended Complaint against Defendants Fujitsu Limited, Fujitsu America, Inc., Fujitsu Semiconductor America, Inc. (collectively “Fujitsu”), Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (“AMD”), Qualcomm Incorporated (“Qualcomm”), Elpida Memory, Inc., Elpida Memory (USA) Inc. (collectively “Elpida”),1 SK Hynix Inc., SK Hynix America Inc., Hynix Semiconductor Manufacturing America Inc. (collectively “SK Hynix”),
    [Show full text]
  • 2008 International Symposium on Semiconductor Manufacturing
    2008 International Symposium on Semiconductor Manufacturing (ISSM 2008) Tokyo, Japan 27 – 29 October 2008 IEEE Catalog Number: CFP08SSM-PRT ISBN: 978-1-61284-948-5 ISSM 2008 Program Schedule The 1st day (Monday, October 27) Tutorial Session Room: Century A/B 9:30 Tutorial Session AEC/APC Introduction of AEC/APC's history Mr. Toshihiko Osada, Senior Manager, Fujitsu Microelectronics Limited Manufacturing engineering and AEC/APC Mr. Kensuke Uriga, CEO/President, Dura Systems Corporation Application of control theory for AEC/APC in semiconductor fabrication Mr. Hiroshi Shimizu, Director/Advanced Solution Department, Advance Automation Company, Yamatake Corporation 9:00 Tutorial Session ESH SUSTAINABILITY AND ESH ASPECTS OF ADVANCED SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING Prof. Farhang Shadman, Regents Professor of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, the University of Arizona Opening Remarks Room: Century 13:00 Keynote Speech Session Room: Century 13:20 Challenges in The DRAM Business Mr.Yukio Sakamoto, President&CEO, Elpida Memory,Inc. 14:10 The New Dynamics of Semiconductor Industry Dr. Tien Wu, Chief Operating Officer, Board of Directors, Advanced Semiconductor Engineering Inc.(ASE) 15:00 Break Oral Session Room: Century A Highlight Session <Advanced Lithography Session> 15:10 PE-O-097 Phenomenology of ArF Photoresist Shrinkage Trends ..........................................................3 Benjamin Bunday, ISMI 15:30 PE-O-044 Lithography Hotspot Discovery at 70nm DRAM 300mm Fab : Process Window Qualification Using Design Based Binning...............................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • Top 300 Organizations Granted U.S. Patents in 2007
    Top 300 Organizations Granted U.S. Patents in 2007 NOTE: IPO DOES NOT INTEND TO ENCOURAGE MORE PATENTING IN U.S. This annual report listing the organizations that received the most U.S. utility patents is being published by fO kramedarT & tnetaP .S.U eht morf deniatbo atad no desab si tI .raey evitucesnoc ht52 eht rof OPI rof eht ht52 evitucesnoc .raey tI si desab no atad deniatbo morf eht .S.U tnetaP & kramedarT fO fi .ec Patents granted to parent and subsidiary companies are combined in some instances. See the end notes for background on how the report was prepared. IPO does not intend for this report to encourage or discourage patenting. Some critics believe companies are applying for too many patents. In 2007 the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office announced that it would no longer publish its own report on organizations receiving the most patents, because it wanted to discour- age “any perception that we believe more is better.” IPO has opted to continue publishing this IPO report, however, because the number of patents granted is one of the few objective measures of the patent system as a whole and the patenting activities of individual industries and companies. IPO and others are study- ing ways to develop more reliable measures of patent quality. May 21, 2008 Contents: Numerical Listing . 2 Alphabetical Listing . 6 Notes . 10 © Copyright 2008 Intellectual Property Owners Association 1 2007 Patent Owners Numerical Listing Rank Organization Patent Rank Organization Patent 1 International Business Machines Corp. 3,125 45 Sanyo Electric Co., Ltd. 454 2 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • Respondents(Eng)
    JCGR JCGIndex Survey 2008 List of 252 responding firms Mining (1) House Foods Corporation (03)(05)(06) INPEX Corporation (07) (07) Nichirei Corporation (02)(03)(04)(05)(06) Construction (13) (07) Taisei Corporation (05)(06)(07) Fujicco Co., Ltd. ((07) OBAYASHI CORPORATION (04)(05)(06) (07) Textiles & Apparel (6) HASEKO Corporation Gunze Limited (02)(03)(04)(05)(06)(07) KAJIMA Corporation Japan Wool Textile Co., Ltd. (04)(05) Maeda Corporation (02)(03)(04)(05)(06) (06)(07) (07) Teijin Limited (03)(04)(05)(06)(07) Totetsu Kogyo Co., Ltd. (04)(05)(06)(07) Toray Industries, Inc. (03)(05)(06) TOA CORPORATION Japan Vilene Company, Ltd. (05)(07) Daiwa House Industry Co., Ltd. (05)(06) Wacoal Holdings Corp. (02)(04)(05)(06) (07) (07) Sekisui House, Ltd. (05)(06)(07) Nippon Densetsu Kogyo Co., Ltd. (04) Pulp and Paper (2) (05)(07) Rengo Co., Ltd. (02)(04)(05)(06)(07) Takasago Thermal Engineering Co., Ltd. The Pack Corporation (06) DAI-DAN Co., Ltd. (04)(05)(06) Chemicals (20) Toyo Engineering Corporation Asahi Kasei Corporation (05)(06)(07) Showa Denko K.K (04)(05)(06)(07) Foods (10) Nippon Soda Co., Ltd. (03)(04)(05)(06) Morozoff Limited (07) (07) NH Foods Ltd. (04)(05)(06)(07) Tokuyama Corpo (02)(04)(05)(06)(07) Asahi Breweries, Ltd. (02)(03)(04)(05) Kanto Denka Kogyo Co., Ltd. (04)(05)(06) (06)(07) (07) The Nisshin OilliO Group, Ltd. (05)(06) Shin-Etsu Chemical Co., Ltd. (05)(06) (07) Mitsubishi Chemical Holdings Fuji Oil Co., Ltd. (03)(04) Corporation (04)(05)(06) Kikkoman Corporation (07) JSR Corporation (04)(05)(06)(07) Ajinomoto Co., Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Green Fab1—Requirements for a Good Semiconductor Factory
    HIGHLIGHT Roundtable Meeting with Stakeholders Green Fab1—Requirements for a Good Semiconductor Factory On June 27, 2007, we invited some of our stakeholders to a roundtable meeting to discuss the requirements for a good semiconductor factory. Specifically, we invited representatives of the fol- lowing companies engaged in the upstream and downstream semiconductor manufacturing processes: semiconductor manufacturers, relevant equipment and component manufacturers, and a company engaged in the design and construction of clean rooms. 1. Green Fab: Meaning a factory/manufacturing process that is comprehensively environment-conscious Collaboration from the Upstream through manufacturers. However, when we have the rare opportunity to visit Downstream Processes Is Essential the factory of a semiconductor manufacturer, we often find room Mr. Honma: I would like to comment in my capacity as someone for improvement at the factory, something which only component engaged in building semiconductor factories and production manufacturers would be able to see. For example, the pipe on a systems. As a result of the shift from 200-millimeter wafers to 300- freezer might be too long and coiled up. Although the freezer is millimeter wafers, the power consumed by semiconductor produc- working hard to keep the temperature below zero, the long pipe is tion equipment is increasing, and we are now required to save even continuously giving out heat beside the freezer. Reducing this type more energy. For the environment, it is important to eliminate of waste would help reduce the environmental impact of the factory, HIGHLIGHT duplication and waste in semiconductor factories from a compre- and roundtable meetings like this one are very useful for this hensive viewpoint, but the environmental efficiency of individual purpose.
    [Show full text]
  • News Release
    News Release INCJ Announces Appointment of CEO of Japan Display TOKYO, November 15, 2011—Innovation Network Corporation Japan (“INCJ”) announced today the appointment of Shuichi Otsuka as CEO of Japan Display Inc. (“Japan Display”), a new company scheduled for establishment in Spring of 2012 that will specialize in the development and production of small- and medium-sized displays for the global market. Japan Display is being formed through the integration of display businesses currently being operated by subsidiaries of Hitachi, Sony and Toshiba, with capital backing and management control by INCJ. Shuichi Otsuka will formally assume the position of CEO following completion of the required procedures, until which time he will maintain his present role as a senior advisor to the INCJ engaged in preparations for the launch of Japan Display. Background of Shuichi Otsuka 1980 Joined Texas Instruments Japan K.K. 1998 Joined Sony Corporation 2002 Joined Elpida Memory, Inc. 2004 Appointed COO, Elpida Memory, Inc. 2011 Resigned as director, Elpida Memory, Inc. Appointed CEO, Japan Display Inc. (designated) Comments on leadership announcement Shuichi Otsuka, CEO (designated), Japan Display Inc. “All of us participating in this integration have a shared sense of its significance and a strong determination to ensure that it succeeds. I see it as my mission to channel that ambition, through decisive leadership from a neutral and balanced perspective, to develop Japan Display into a world leader in small- and medium-sized displays.” Kimikazu Noumi, CEO, Innovation Network Corporation Japan “Shuichi Otsuka has extensive experience in developing cutting-edge technology and making major investment decisions at global corporations.
    [Show full text]
  • STATEMENT of INVESTMENTS Dreyfus Premier Total Return Advantage Fund July 31, 2007 (Unaudited)
    STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS Dreyfus Premier Total Return Advantage Fund July 31, 2007 (Unaudited) Coupon Maturity Principal Bonds and Notes--103.6% Rate (%) Date Amount ($) Value ($) Asset-Backed Ctfs./Auto Receivables--4.6% Capital One Auto Finance Trust, Ser. 2005-C, Cl. A3 4.61 7/15/10 57,941 57,806 Chase Manhattan Auto Owner Trust, Ser. 2003-C, Cl. A4 2.94 6/15/10 47,229 47,018 Daimler Chrysler Auto Trust, Ser. 2004-A, Cl. A4 2.58 4/8/09 40,568 40,391 Harley-Davidson Motorcycle Trust, Ser. 2004-1, Cl. A2 2.53 11/15/11 58,861 57,503 Honda Auto Receivables Owner Trust, Ser. 2005-5, Cl. A4 4.69 2/15/11 140,000 139,153 Household Automotive Trust, Ser. 2003-2, Cl. A4 3.02 12/17/10 49,853 49,489 USAA Auto Owner Trust, Ser. 2004-3, Cl. A4 3.53 6/15/11 100,000 98,865 WFS Financial Owner Trust, Ser. 2004-2, Cl. A4 3.54 11/21/11 62,435 61,869 552,094 Asset-Backed Ctfs./Credit Cards--3.3% Capital One Multi-Asset Execution Trust, Ser. 2005-A2, Cl. A2 4.05 2/15/11 100,000 99,216 Chase Issuance Trust, Ser. 2005-A10, Cl. A10 4.65 12/17/12 100,000 98,732 Citibank Credit Card Issuance Trust, Ser. 2003-A8, Cl. A8 3.50 8/16/10 100,000 98,317 MBNA Master Credit Card Trust, Ser. 2000-L, Cl. A 6.50 4/15/10 100,000 100,382 396,647 Asset-Backed Ctfs./Home Equity Loans--2.5% MASTR Asset-Backed Securities Trust, Ser.
    [Show full text]
  • EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, PROVISIONAL NON
    EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, PROVISIONAL NON CONFIDENTIAL VERSION OF THE COMMISSION DECISION of 19 May 2010 relating to a proceeding under Article 101 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (COMP/38511 – DRAMs) N.B.: This is a provisional non confidential version. Confidentiality claims are still underdiscussion. The definitive non confidential version will be published as soon as it is available. (Only the English text is authentic) (Text with EEA relevance) - 1 - TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................................6 2. PROCEDURE .............................................................................................................7 3. THE INDUSTRY SUBJECT TO THE PROCEEDINGS...........................................8 3.1. The product concerned by the cartel .................................................................8 3.2. The companies subject to the proceedings ........................................................9 3.2.1. Micron .................................................................................................9 3.2.2. Infineon................................................................................................9 3.2.3. Hynix ...................................................................................................9 3.2.4. Samsung ..............................................................................................9 3.2.5. NEC .....................................................................................................9
    [Show full text]