The Upper Tisa Valley. Preparatory Proposal for Ramsar Site Designation and an Ecological Background Hungarian, Romanian, Slovakian and Ukrainian Co- Operation

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Upper Tisa Valley. Preparatory Proposal for Ramsar Site Designation and an Ecological Background Hungarian, Romanian, Slovakian and Ukrainian Co- Operation See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/286732427 The Upper Tisa Valley. Preparatory Proposal for Ramsar Site Designation and an Ecological Background Hungarian, Romanian, Slovakian and Ukrainian co- operation. Book · December 1999 DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.1.3000.3281 CITATIONS READS 14 681 32 authors, including: Ákos Harka Andrey Kovalchuk Hungarian Ichthyological Society Uzhhorod National University 39 PUBLICATIONS 395 CITATIONS 324 PUBLICATIONS 141 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Andriy Mihaly Constantin Drăgulescu Uzhhorod National University Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu 35 PUBLICATIONS 74 CITATIONS 19 PUBLICATIONS 129 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: The Conservation of Insects and Their Habitats View project Environmental history of Hortobágy, Hungary View project All content following this page was uploaded by Andrey Kovalchuk on 13 December 2015. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. monograph series TISCIA The Upper Tisa Valley Preparatory proposal for Ramsar site designation and an ecological background Hungarian, Romanian, Slovakian and Ukrainian co-operation Editors Hamar, J. & A. Sárkány-Kiss Szeged 1999 The Upper Tisa Valley TISCIA monograph series 1. J. Hamar and A. Sárkány-Kiss (eds.): The Maros/Mureş River Valley. A Study of the Geography, Hydrobiology and Ecology of the River and its Environment, 1995. 2. A. Sárkány-Kiss and J. Hamar (eds.): The Criş/Körös Rivers’ Valleys. A Study of the Geography, Hydrobiology and Ecology of the River and its Environment, 1997. 3. A. Sárkány-Kiss and J. Hamar (eds.): The Someş/Szamor River Valleys. A Study of the Geography, Hydrobiology and Ecology of the River and its Environment, 1999. 4. J. Hamar and A. Sárkány-Kiss (eds.): The Upper Tisa Valley. Preparatory Proposal for Ramsar Site Designation and an Ecological Background, 1999. The Upper Tisa Valley Preparatory proposal for Ramsar site designation and an ecological background Hungarian, Romanian, Slovakian and Ukrainian co-operation Editors Hamar, J. & A. Sárkány-Kiss Szeged 1999 The Upper Tisa Valley Preparatory proposal for Ramsar site designation and an ecological background Hungarian, Romanian, Slovakian and Ukrainian co-operation Contributing Organizations Ramsar Small Grants Fund for Wetland Conservation and Wise Use, Switzerland Regional Environmental Center, Budapest, Hungary Regional Water Works, Szolnok, Hungary Editors: Hamar, J. & A. Sárkány-Kiss Cover design and layout: Mária Bodolai Executive manager: József Hamar, Tisza Klub Published by Tisza Klub & Liga Pro Europa Tisza Klub for Environment and Nature 5001 Szolnok, Pf. 148, Hungary Liga Pro Europa 4300 Târgu Mureş, P.O. Box 1-154, Romania Printed by Tisza Nyomda Kft. 5000 Szolnok Himba út 5. Hungary ISSN 1418-0448 ISBN 963 03 7645 8 Preface The River Tisa catchment area is one of the most important regions in the Danube River Basin. Since 1991, we have been studying the transboundary river valleys from their headwaters to their junctions with River Tisa. The Upper Tisza region is not just a culturally and ethnically unique territory, but also has a diverse natural and life history. Prospective social and economic changes, as a result of the transition from one economic and social system to another, now threaten this region where natural resources, forests, water, are of the greatest value to the people living there. This book is a case-study of the Upper-Tisa Valley, where besides surveying the ecological background, we have completed a proposal for the establishment of a 400 km long (about 140 000 ha) transboundary Ramsar Wetland System. The Project has been carried through by non-governmental organisations of four countries: Hungary, Romania, Ukraine and Slovakia. We hope our ambition can contribute to building the Pan-European Ecological Network, furthermore the natural and cultural heritage of the regions can be components of a sustainable development. József Hamar Andrei Sárkány-Kiss Tisza Klub Liga Pro Europa, Environmental Group Szolnok, Hungary Targu Mures, Romania 5 Foreword The basic obligations of the Ramsar Convention on Wetlands are the following: - each Contracting Party shall designate suitable wetlands within its territory for inclusion on a List of Wetlands of International Importance; - the Contracting Parties shall formulate and implement their planning so as to promote the conservation of the wetlands included in the List and, as much as possible, the wise use of wetlands in their territory; - each Contracting Party shall promote the conservation of wetlands and waterfowl by establishing nature reserves in wetlands, irrespective of whether they are included in the List or not, and provide adequately for their wardening; - the Contracting Parties shall consult with each other about implementing obligations arising from the Convention especially in the case of a wetland extending over the territories of more than one Contracting Party or where a water system is shared by CPs. They shall at the same time endeavour to coordinate and support present and future policies and regulations concerning the conservation of wetlands and their flora and fauna. In order to streamline and focus the activities for the implementation of the treaty, a Strategic Plan for the Convention was introduced a few years ago. Within the framework of this Plan, international cooperation activities -inter-alia such related to transfrontier wetlands - have been intensified. It was clear also that the Plan needed even greater involvement of the commun- ity of non-governmental organizations (NGOs), for instance in identifying wetlands of international importance, including those within shared catchment/river basins. Hungary, Romania, Slovakia and Ukraine are members of the Ramsar Convention, and the NGO-s, the experts, researchers, and committed individuals of countries who compiled this book endeavoured to put into practice the fourth above obligation as well as the relevant objective of the Strategic Plan. They collected the necessary Ramsar data, carried out surveys and research in the Upper Tisa river catchment. It is encouraging that NGOs took the initiative and intensively cooperated in order to prepare a possible future transboundary Ramsar site. It is hoped that this initiative will be followed-up by the respective governments of the four involved countries. Data collection on the physical, ecological features, hydrological, biodiversity as well as social and cultural values and benefits of a wetland - in particular a 7 transboundary one - is a tedious and complicated work constituting an important first step in conserving, maintaining and wisely using this habitat type. It is well known that the success in any field depends on the willing cooperation of partners fully informed and working together to achieve shared goals. This publication significantly contributes to the revealing and better understanding of the values of the Upper Tisa region. Therefore the efforts of the authors of this book are to be highly appreciated and commended. Louise Lakos Chairperson of the Standing Committee of the Ramsar Convention on Wetlands 8 The Upper Tisa Valley Preparatory proposal for Ramsar site designation by Ruthenia Ecoclub, Uzhgorod, Ukraine Ecological Society of Maramures, Baia Mare, Romania People and Water, Košice, Slovak Republic Upper Tisza Foundation, Nyíregyháza, Hungary and compiled by Tisza Klub, Szolnok, Hungary 9 Dear Reader, The book you are keeping in your hands is the result of a work carried out with great enthusiasm by a consortium of non-governmental organizations. Tisza Klub initiated the process as early as in 1996, with the aim of bringing together people who know and love their own environment, in this particular case River Tisa. First, the aim was to compile a study which can serve as a firm base for the establishment of a protected area in the Upper Tisa catchment, crossing borders and linking regions. This part of the work was supported financially by the Regional Environmental Centre. After an intensive period of work, people concerned came together to discuss the results achieved and further tasks. During the consultations it was realized that the most convenient tool facilitating the establishment of the desired protected area would be the Ramsar Convention, namely the designation of a transboundary Ramsar site. All governments concerned were approached and each of them reacted positively and supported the idea. This gave a new momentum to the process because the consortium realized that it could produce a unique product. This uniqueness has two major features, one is that it involves a long stretch of a river (400 km) together with its floodplains, the second is that it will be a quadrilateral transboundary site (involving Romania, Ukraine, Slovakia and Hungary). No other similar Ramsar site has been established recently. At the same time the Wise Use concept of the Ramsar Convention have perfectly served the aims of the consortium, because beyond the establishment of the protected area (Ramsar site), through their studies they wanted also to introduce to the area the idea of sustainable use of the river and its catchment. On the other hand, the consortium keeping an eye on recent European developments within nature conservation, especially on ecological networks, supplemented the original idea with such further goals that will end in a design of a complex riverine
Recommended publications
  • СИСТЕМАТИКА ТА ФІЛОГЕНЕТИЧНІ ЗВ'язки РОДУ ULMUS L. За Літературними Джерелами Досліджено Філогенетичні Зв'язки Роду Ulmus L
    https://nv.nltu.edu.ua https://doi.org/10.15421/40290510 Article received 22.05.2019 р. S. A. Maslovata Article accepted 30.05.2019 р. [email protected] УДК 582.637.1:57.065 С. А. Масловата, В. Л. Кульбіцький, М. Ю. Осіпов Уманський національний університет садівництва, м. Умань, Україна СИСТЕМАТИКА ТА ФІЛОГЕНЕТИЧНІ ЗВ'ЯЗКИ РОДУ ULMUS L. За літературними джерелами досліджено філогенетичні зв'язки роду Ulmus L. Встановлено за даними бази GRIN, що у світі всього нараховується понад 30 видів роду Ulmus, поширених переважно в помірній зоні північної півкулі. З них 10 трапляються на території України, в помірній зоні європейської частини, на Північному Кавказі, в Забайкаллі та на Дале- кому Сході в широколистяних і хвойно-широколистяних лісах. По берегах річок на півночі зони зростання вклинюються у європейську темнохвойну тайгу, а на півдні – у Степову та Лісостепову зони. Як типові супутні породи мішаних лісів Євро- пи найпоширеніші такі представники роду Ulmus: U. laevis Pall., U. glabra HuDs., U. suberosa moench, U. elliptica K. Koch; в Азії – U. propinqua, U. laciniata (Trautv.) mayr та U. pumila L; у Північній Америці – U. americana L. На території України поширені сім аборигенних видів U. androssowii Litv., U. minor mill., U. glabra HuDs., U. laciniata (Trautv.) mayr, U. laevis Pall., U. macrocarpa Hance, U. pumila L. та три інтродукованих види: U. japonica (RehD.) Sarg., U. americana L. та U. densa Litw. З'ясовано, що номенклатура видів роду Ulmus складна і заплутана. Складність полягає не тільки в народних, але й у латинських назвах. Так, у літературних джерелах виявлено безліч синонімів латинських назв. Причиною, яка ускладнює таксономію в'язів, є поширення процесів природної гібридизації в межах роду Ulmus.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity Assessment for Georgia
    Biodiversity Assessment for Georgia Task Order under the Biodiversity & Sustainable Forestry IQC (BIOFOR) USAID C ONTRACT NUMBER: LAG-I-00-99-00014-00 SUBMITTED TO: USAID WASHINGTON E&E BUREAU, ENVIRONMENT & NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION SUBMITTED BY: CHEMONICS INTERNATIONAL INC. WASHINGTON, D.C. FEBRUARY 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION I INTRODUCTION I-1 SECTION II STATUS OF BIODIVERSITY II-1 A. Overview II-1 B. Main Landscape Zones II-2 C. Species Diversity II-4 SECTION III STATUS OF BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION III-1 A. Protected Areas III-1 B. Conservation Outside Protected Areas III-2 SECTION IV STRATEGIC AND POLICY FRAMEWORK IV-1 A. Policy Framework IV-1 B. Legislative Framework IV-1 C. Institutional Framework IV-4 D. Internationally Supported Projects IV-7 SECTION V SUMMARY OF FINDINGS V-1 SECTION VI RECOMMENDATIONS FOR IMPROVED BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION VI-1 SECTION VII USAID/GEORGIA VII-1 A. Impact of the Program VII-1 B. Recommendations for USAID/Georgia VII-2 ANNEX A SECTIONS 117 AND 119 OF THE FOREIGN ASSISTANCE ACT A-1 ANNEX B SCOPE OF WORK B-1 ANNEX C LIST OF PERSONS CONTACTED C-1 ANNEX D LISTS OF RARE AND ENDANGERED SPECIES OF GEORGIA D-1 ANNEX E MAP OF LANDSCAPE ZONES (BIOMES) OF GEORGIA E-1 ANNEX F MAP OF PROTECTED AREAS OF GEORGIA F-1 ANNEX G PROTECTED AREAS IN GEORGIA G-1 ANNEX H GEORGIA PROTECTED AREAS DEVELOPMENT PROJECT DESIGN SUMMARY H-1 ANNEX I AGROBIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION IN GEORGIA (FROM GEF PDF GRANT PROPOSAL) I-1 SECTION I Introduction This biodiversity assessment for the Republic of Georgia has three interlinked objectives: · Summarizes the status of biodiversity and its conservation in Georgia; analyzes threats, identifies opportunities, and makes recommendations for the improved conservation of biodiversity.
    [Show full text]
  • Türkiye Bitkileri Listesi (Damarli Bitkiler)” Adli Eserin Bilgi Kaynaği Ve Terim Yaklaşimi Üzerine Bir Değerlendirme
    Eurasscience Journals Avrasya Terim Dergisi, 2014, 2 (1): 50 - 67 “TÜRKİYE BİTKİLERİ LİSTESİ (DAMARLI BİTKİLER)” ADLI ESERİN BİLGİ KAYNAĞI VE TERİM YAKLAŞIMI ÜZERİNE BİR DEĞERLENDİRME Orhan SEVGİ1, Ünal AKKEMİK2 1) İ. Ü. Orman Fakültesi Toprak İlmi ve Ekoloji Anabilim Dalı, Bahçeköy-İstanbul; ileti: [email protected] 2) İ. Ü. Orman Fakültesi Orman Botaniği Anabilim Dalı, Bahçeköy-İstanbul; ileti: [email protected] Özet Bu çalışmada; Türkiye bitkilerini topluca detaylı bir şekilde listeleyen ve önemli bir boşluğu dolduran "Türkiye Bitkileri Listesi (Damarlı Bitkiler)" isimli eserde bilgi kaynağı ve terim açısından görülen bazı noktaların değerlendirilmesi ve bundan sonra yazılacak olan benzer eserlere yarar sağlayacak bir tartışma ortamı yaratılması amaçlanmıştır. Eser iki farklı açıdan değerlendirilmiştir. Birincisi, bazı odunsu bitkilere ilişkin örnekler verilerek Picea, Abies, Pinus, Philadelphus, Ulmus veTilia gibi bazı odunsu bitkilere ilişkin, düzeltilmesi gereken kısımlar belirtilmiş, bu hatalara yol açan nedenler irdelenmiştir. İkincisi ise Türkçe bitki adları üzerinde durulmuştur. Konu, kaynak kullanımı, düzensiz adlandırma, yanlış adlandırma ve belirsiz adlandırma başlıkları altınnda incelenmiştir. Örnekler büyük oranda Orchidaceae familyasından verilmiştir. Türkiye'nin odunsu türleriyle ilgili bilgi birikiminin kitaptaki ilgili metinlerde yeterince yansıtılmadığı ve ilgili uzmanlardan yeterince yararlanılmadığı görülmüştür. Türkçe bitki adları konusunda ise gösterilen hassasiyetin eserdeki yansımaları beklenenin
    [Show full text]
  • The Danish Botanical Society Summer Excursion 1St to 10Th June 2014
    Armenia The Danish Botanical Society Summer excursion st th 1 to 10 June 2014 Danish Botanical Society – Excursion to Armenia1st – 10th June 2014 Editorial notes Compilation of report: Peter Wind, closed at 28th April 2015. Contributors to content: Anush Nersesian, Terkel Arnfred, Irina Goldberg, Erika Groentved Christiansen, Søren Groentved Christiansen, Bjarne Green, Leif Laursen, Jytte Leopold, Claus Leopold, Inger Vedel, Thyge Enevoldsen, Birte Uhre Pedersen & Peter Wind. Number of pages: 48. Photos on front page: Upper left – Amberd Castle at Buyracan, photo: P. Wind, 10-6-2014; upper right - Phelypaea turnefortii in dry grassland at Martiros south of Vyak, photo: P. Wind, 5-6-2014; lower left - Lilium szovitsianum in the shade of a deciduous forest south of the city of Dijijan, photo: P. Wind, 3-6-2014; lower right – Ansvarkar Monastery on a little peninsula in Lake Seven, photo: P. Wind, 8-6-2014. Content Picture of participants 3 List of participants 4 Map of Armenia with administrative regions (Marz) 5 The program of the excursion – before leaving Denmark (in Danish) 6 Actual itinerary 9 The Armenian language 17 Practical notes on Armenia (in Danish) 18 Insects of Armenia 20 Flora in Armenia - Overview and Popular Spring Flora 23 Botanical notes of the flora of Armenia 27 A selction of plant species of intererest 30 Some participants in the field 32 Impressions from Yerevan, especially from the last extra day 33 Traditional use of Armenian plants 34 Vascular plant list 35 Page 2 Danish Botanical Society – Excursion to Armenia1st – 10th June 2014 The traditional line up at the small cottages (picture below) close to the Ughedzor pass.
    [Show full text]
  • Fossilium Catalogus II: Plantae
    © Biodiversity Heritage Library, http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/; 4rib©iÄ&orj of Paleö&otlanf 's Fossilium Catalogus II: Plantae. Editus a W. Jongmans. Pars 10: K. Nagalhard vorm. Nagel, Ulmaceae. / jr W. Junk Berlin W. 15 7. Yl. 1922. © Biodiversity Heritage Library, http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/; © Biodiversity Heritage Library, http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/; Fossilium Catalogus II: Plantae. Editus a W. Jongmans. Pars 10: K. Nagalhard vorm. Nagel, Ulmaeeae. W. Junk Berlin W. 15 1922 © Biodiversity Heritage Library, http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/; Druck: August Hopfer, Burg Bz. Mgdbg. © Biodiversity Heritage Library, http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/; Inhaltsübersicht. Vorbemerkungen. 1 Aphananthe Planchon.... 3 Celtidophyllum Krasser. 3 Celtis L. 4 Celtitis Tuszon.14 Hemiptelea Planchon.14 Microptelea Spach.14 Momisia F. Gr. Dietrich.15 Planera Gmel.16 Pteroceltis Maxim. .18 Ulminium Unger . •. 19 Ulmiphyllum v. Ettingsh. 20 Ulmitis Dawson.21 Ulmoxylon Kaiser.22 Ulmus L. 23 Zelcova Spach.66 Alphabetisches Verzeichnis der unter verschiedenen Namen veröffentlichten Ulmaceen-Fossilien.77 Addenda.80 Übersicht über die Gattungen. 80 © Biodiversity Heritage Library, http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/; Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2018 with funding from BHL-SIL-FEDLINK https://archive.org/details/fossiriumcatalogunse_8 © Biodiversity Heritage Library, http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/; Vorbemerkungen. Übersicht über die rezenten Gattungen der Ulmaceen und ihre Verbreitung. Ulmoideae Celtidoideae s Phyllostylon Capanema, (1) Celtis L., (60) gemäßigte Zone Brasilien und unter den Tropen beider Hemisphären [Momisia Dumortier, (18) trop. Amerika] Holoptelea Planchon, (1) Ost¬ Pteroceltis Maxim., (1) Mon¬ indien, Ceylon golei, nördl. China. Ulmus L., (16) gemäß. Region ? Ampelocera Klotzsch, (2) Peru d. nördl. Halbkugel, auch in u. Kuba (ob zur Familie ge¬ Gebirgen d.
    [Show full text]
  • Őshonos És Termesztett Szilfáink Fajai
    Őshonos és termesztett szilfáink fajai. Irta : Dr. Simonkai Lajos, egy. magántanár. A földképzés jelen, vagyis alluviumos korszakában, hazánk síkjain és hegyvidékein ősrégi időktől vadon, vagyis önként termő, úgynevezett őshonos szilfáink erdészeti fon- tásságát, valamint sokoldalú gyakorlati hasznát, eléggé részletesen vázolja az a közkézen forgó, vaskos, pályadíj­ nyertes erdészeti növénytanunk, a mely Fekete Lajos és Mágócsy-Dietz Sándor urakat vallja jeles szerzőinek. A magyar erdész jól ösmeri a szilfát, mint haszonfát; jól tudja, hogy a szilfák, legalább a nálunk őshonosak, kedvező talajviszonyok mellett, gyorsan növekedő, sok faanyagot termő fák; tudja, hogy egyik másik fajuk, főkép a folyómelléki, talajvízben nem szűkölködő erdőkben és kertesitésekben, oly hatalmas példányokká fejldikk ki, hogy koronájának csúcsa felemelkedik 33—40 méter magas­ ságra, derekának vastagsága pedig eléri vagy mégis ha­ ladhatja az 1 méternyi törzsátmérőt. Eléggé ösmeretes az is, hogy a szilfák évente dúsan virítanak és mert viráguk csak nagy ritkán fagy el, évente bőven termik hártyás- szárnyu, lapos, könnyű terméseiket és azokat éretten a légáramlatok hullámain szerteszét repíthetik. Önmaga ere­ jéből is biztosan és bőven szaporodhatik ezért a szilfa; könnyebben és bővebben, mint a tölgyfa, a melylyel egy szintájon tenyész, hol békességben, hol élet-halálküzdelem közt." Alföldi, igy folyammenti erdeinkben manapság gyak­ ran a szilfáé a győzelem; mert a hol ezekben az erde­ inkben a vénhedt tölgyes erdők pusztulásnak indulnak, a nyárfákkal és kőrisfákkal együttesen, vagy esetleg egyedül is, a szilfák szerterepülő ezernyi-ezer magva lepi el a talajt, ők magzanak fel a tölgymakknál jóval serényebben ós gyorsabb növekedésük révén ők lesznek uralkodókká az egykori tölgyes helyén. Ennyi figyelemreméltó jeles tulajdonság önként is felkölti a szilfák tanulmányozása iránt az erdész érdeklő­ dését.
    [Show full text]
  • Роль Bison Bonasus (Linnaeus, 1758) В Формировании Мозаики Природного Лесного Покрова Восточной Европы
    Vol. 1 (2), 2016 УДК 574.42 DOI: 10.21685/2500-0578-2016-2-3 REVIEW Open Access РОЛЬ BISON BONASUS (LINNAEUS, 1758) В ФОРМИРОВАНИИ МОЗАИКИ ПРИРОДНОГО ЛЕСНОГО ПОКРОВА ВОСТОЧНОЙ ЕВРОПЫ. СООБЩЕНИЕ ПЕРВОЕ. ДИНАМИКА АРЕАЛА И ОСОБЕННОСТИ ТРОФИЧЕСКОЙ И ТОПИЧЕСКОЙ ДЕЯТЕЛЬНОСТИ ЕВРОПЕЙСКОГО ЗУБРА В ПОЗДНЕМ ГОЛОЦЕНЕ НА ТЕРРИТОРИИ ВОСТОЧНОЙ ЕВРОПЫ Н. Е. Шевченко Центр по проблемам экологии и продуктивности лесов РАН, Россия, 117485, Москва, ул. Профсоюзная, 84/32, E-mail: [email protected] THE ROLE OF BISON BONASUS (LINNAEUS, 1758) IN THE MOSAIC FORMATION OF NATURAL FOREST COVER IN EASTERN EUROPE. FIRST ARTICLE. THE DYNAMICS OF THE AREA, AND FEATURES OF THE FOOD AND TOPICAL ACTIVITY OF THE EUROPEAN BISON IN THE LATE HOLOCENE IN EASTERN EUROPE N. E. Shevchenko Center for problems of ecology and productivity of forests of the Russian Academy of Sciences (CEPF), 84/32 Profsoyuznaya st., Moscow, Russia E-mail: [email protected] Аннотация. Приведен обзор опубликованных работ по динамике ареала европейского зубра (Bison bona- sos L.) в Восточной Европе с раннего голоцена до настоящего времени и определены причины его исчезно- вения. Рассмотрена трофическая и топическая деятельность европейского зубра, дана оценка его средообразующего воздействия на растительный покров. Подготовлена база видов кормовых растений, по- едаемых зубром в лесном поясе Восточной Европы, насчитывающая 624 вида сосудистых растений. Состав- лены полные списки видов кормовых растений и списки видов, имеющих высокую кормовую ценность для зубров, обитающих в польской и белорусской частях Беловежской пущи, Приокско-Террасном заповеднике и на Северном Кавказе. Ключевые слова: зубр, ареал, голоцен, история расселения и истребления зубра, трофическое и топиче- ское воздействие зубров на растения и сообщества, база кормовых растений: экологические и эколого- ценотические группы видов.
    [Show full text]
  • Een Nieuwe Toekomst Met Nieuwe Én Oude Iepen Het Geslacht Ulmus: Een Comeback
    Een nieuwe toekomst met nieuwe én oude iepen Het geslacht Ulmus: een comeback Iepen behoren tot de sterkste bomen voor stedelijke omstandigheden en open landschappen. Door de iepenziekte is het iepenbestand in de vorige eeuw enorm achteruitgegaan, maar nu is het sortiment met beschikbare resistente cultivars sterk toegenomen en er komen steeds nieuwe bij: het iepensortiment is constant in beweging. In deze special zijn de Europese soorten en de belangrijke cultivars beschreven. Het zijn de Wageningse cultivars die in Nederland het meest worden aangeplant, maar de inheemse fladderiep en een aantal Amerikaanse hybriden zijn sterk in opkomst. Auteur: Leo Goudzwaard 4 www.boomzorg.nl www. boom-in-business.nl Special Iepen Historie Zeker al vanaf de veertiende eeuw werden iepen gekweekt en aangeplant in bossen voor houtproductie. Vanaf de zestiende eeuw plantte men iepen op openbare plaatsen en vanaf de zeventiende eeuw in rijen langs akkers voor hout- productie. In die eeuwen waren iepen in omloop met namen als ‘rode iep’, ‘witte iep’ en ‘steen- olm’, geselecteerd naar de houteigenschappen, en ‘vette olm’, naar de snelle groei. Pas vanaf ca. 1750 werden aan sommige iepenklonen Latijnse namen toegekend1. Er verschenen meer gekweekte vormen met afwijkende bladkleur, kroonvorm en groei. Een chaos aan namen en synoniemen ontstond doordat er geen eendui- digheid was in het onderscheiden van soorten, ondersoorten, variëteiten, vormen en geculti- veerde klonen. De Manual of Cultivated Trees and Shrubs van A. Rehder zorgde in 1927 voor De karakteristieke scheve bladvoet van de iep. een eerste ordening. In de International Code of Nomenclature of Cultivated Plants (ICNCP) werden regels voor de naamgeving vastgelegd, waarna het Arnold Arboretum autoriteit kreeg om de juiste cultivarnamen voor iepen vast te stellen.
    [Show full text]
  • Het Geslacht Ulmus - Nieuwe Mogelijkheden
    Het geslacht Ulmus - nieuwe mogelijkheden L. Goudzwaard Iepen behoren tot sterkste bomen voor stede- lijke omstandigheden en open landschappen. Door de iepenziekte is het Iepenbestand in Nederland flink achteruitgegaan. De vorige beschrijving van Ulmus in Dendroflora 5 (1968) verscheen nog voor de verspreiding van de tweede iepenziekte-schimmel in Euro- pa en ook voor de uitgave van alle nieuwe hoogresistente selecties. Sindsdien zijn de inzichten in naamgeving en de beschikbare cultivars sterk veranderd. Het iepensortiment is constant in beweging; tijd voor een update in Dendroflora. In dit artikel de voor Nederland belangrijke soorten en cultivars. De volgorde is per werelddeel: Europa, Amerika en Azië. Daarna volgen de complexe hybriden.fraaie hopbellen. Iepen behoren tot de oudste gecultiveerde bomen tiende eeuw in rijen langs akkers voor houtpro- op aarde. De Engelse iep, U. procera ‘Atinia’, ductie. In die eeuwen waren iepen in omloop werd vanaf 1550 in meidoornhagen geplant en met namen als “rode iep”, “witte iep” en “steen- heeft het Engelse landschap eeuwenlang gedo- olm”, geselecteerd naar de houteigenschappen, mineerd (Heybroek et al, 2009) . Deze iepenkloon is al en “vette olm”, naar de snelle groei. Pas vanaf beschreven door Columella omstreeks 50 na ca. 1750 werden aan sommige iepenklonen Chr. Er zijn zelfs aanwijzingen dat hij al door Latijnse namen toegekend (Heybroek et al, 2009) . Er de Grieken was geselecteerd voor ondersteuning verschenen meer gekweekte vormen met afwij- van wijnranken en voor veevoer en in Frankrijk kende bladkleur, kroonvorm en groei. Een chaos werd ingevoerd omstreeks 600 v Chr. Iepen zijn aan namen en synoniemen ontstond doordat er belangrijke heilige bomen in de Himalaya en geen eenduidigheid was in het onderscheiden waren dat ook in Noordwest Europa.
    [Show full text]
  • 1964-24--Arnoldia.Pdf
    ARNOLD ARBORETUM HARVARD UNIVERSITY ARNOLDIA A continuation of the BULLETIN OF POPULAR INFORMATION VOLUME XXIV 1964 PUBLISHED BY THE ARNOLD ARBORETUM JAMAICA PLAIN, MASSACHUSETTS ARNOLDIA A continuation of the BULLETIN OF POPULAR INFORMATION of the Arnold Arboretum, Harvard University VOLUME 24 FEBRUARY 28, 1964 NUMBER 1 REGISTRATION LIST OF CULTIVAR NAMES OF FAGUS L. cultivars of Fagus sylvatica only are listed, since no cultivars of the other THE-t- seven species have been found. Group Names: It has become expedient to adopt the provisrons of Article 133 of the International Code of Nomenclature for Cultivated Plants, which states that "4~’ithin a species or interspecific hybrid hrch includes many cultivars - (varieties), assemblages of similar cultivars (varieties) may be designated as groups" as, for example, Fagus sylvatica Atropunicea Group ’Cuprea’. Two group names have been proposed, "Atropunicea Group" and "Variegata Group". Some of the cultivars in these groups are so similar it is most difficult to tell them apart, yet they rate individual cultivar names. Accepted cultivar names are in large and small capitals. Synonyms are listed in roman type. Plants starred with an asterisk (*) are known to be in cultivation in the United States at the present time. ’Albo-marginata’ ("E.S.", Gard. Chron. III. 26: ~3~.. 1899). "A variegated form. The silvery variegation is generally prominent on the margin of the leaf, but some leaves have blotches and streaks of the same color" = ‘Ar.eo-vnarFCATn’ Variegata Group. ‘ALBO-VARIEGATA’* Variegata Group (Weston, Bot. Univ. 1: 10; . 1770). Leaves variegated with white. ‘ANSOecH~r’* Atropunicea Group (Schwenn, Dlitt. Deutsch.
    [Show full text]
  • East Georgia, South Caucasus)
    Accepted Manuscript Conspectus of trees and shrubs of Tbilisi environs (East Georgia, South Caucasus) N.J. Lachashvili, N.V. Eradze, L.D. Khetsuriani PII: S1512-1887(16)30061-6 DOI: 10.1016/j.aasci.2016.08.008 Reference: AASCI 43 To appear in: Annals of Agrarian Sciences Received Date: 22 May 2016 Accepted Date: 25 July 2016 Please cite this article as: N.J. Lachashvili, N.V. Eradze, L.D. Khetsuriani, Conspectus of trees and shrubs of Tbilisi environs (East Georgia, South Caucasus), Annals of Agrarian Sciences (2016), doi: 10.1016/j.aasci.2016.08.008. This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Annals of Agrarian Science vol. 14, no. 3, 2016 Conspectus of trees and shrubs of Tbilisi environs (East Georgia, South Caucasus) N.J. Lachashvili *, N.V. Eradze**, L.D. K hhhetsuriani * *Ilia State University, Institute of Botany 1, Botanikuri Str., Tbilisi, 0114, Georgia ** Georgian National Botanical Garden 1. Botanikuri Str., Tbilisi, 0114, Tbilisi, Georgia Received 22 May 2016, Accepted 25 July 2016 Corresponding author: N.J. Lachashvili [email protected] Abstract Floristic composition of Tbilisi environs trees and shrubs are studied. On the one hand, variety of physical-geographical conditions and ecosystem of Tbilisi, and on the other hand, its location conditioned either floristic or bioecological diversity of the trees and the shrubs.
    [Show full text]
  • Uradalmi Kertészetek a 19. Századi Magyarországon
    10.14751/SZIE.2017.050 SZENT ISTVÁN EGYETEM URADALMI KERTÉSZETEK A 19. SZÁZADI MAGYARORSZÁGON DOKTORI ÉRTEKEZÉS TAKÁCS KATALIN GÖDÖLLŐ 2017. 10.14751/SZIE.2017.050 A doktori iskola megnevezése: Szent István Egyetem Tájépítészeti és Tájökológiai Doktori Iskola tudományága: agrár-műszaki vezetője: Dr. Bozó László egyetemi tanár, DSc / MHAS Szent István Egyetem Kertészettudományi Kar Talajtan és Vízgazdálkodási Tanszék Témavezető: Dr. Fatsar Kristóf egyetemi tanár, PhD habil. Szent István Egyetem Tájépítészeti és Településtervezési Kar Kertművészeti és Kerttechnikai Tanszék A jelölt a Szent István Egyetem Doktori Szabályzatában előírt valamennyi feltételnek eleget tett, az értekezés műhelyvitájában elhangzott észrevételeket és javaslatokat az értekezés átdolgozásakor figyelembe vette, ezért az értekezés nyilvános vitára bocsátható. ........................................................... .......................................................... Az iskolavezető jóváhagyása A témavezető jóváhagyása 10.14751/SZIE.2017.050 TARTALOMJEGYZÉK BEVEZETÉS .................................................................................................................................. 3 Kutatási célkitűzések ................................................................................................................ 4 Témalehatárolás ....................................................................................................................... 5 1. KUTATÁSTÖRTÉNET .........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]