1 Coastal and Halophytic Habitats 2 Coastal Sand Dunes and Inland

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

1 Coastal and Halophytic Habitats 2 Coastal Sand Dunes and Inland 1 Coastal and halophytic habitats 2 Coastal sand dunes and inland dunes 3 Freshwater habitats 4 Temperate heath and scrub 5 Sclerophyllous scrub (matorral) 6 Natural and semi-natural grassland formations 7 Raised bogs and mires and fens 8 Rocky habitats and caves 9 Forests 1 Coastal and halophitic communities 2 Non-marine waters 3 Scrub and grasslands 4 Woodland 5 Bogs and marshes 6 Rocky habitats 7 Agriculture land and highly artificial landscapes 1 INTRODUCTION The habitat classification of Georgia is based on the Interpretation Manual of European Union Habitats - EUR27. The "Habitats" Directive (Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora, O.J. L206) is a Community legislative instrument in the field of nature conservation that establishes a common framework for the conservation of wild animal and plant species and natural habitats of Community importance; it provides for the creation of a network of special areas of conservation, called Natura 2000, to "maintain and restore, at favourable conservation status, natural habitats and species of wild fauna and flora of Community interest". The Directive is developed on the bases of CORINE biotope classification (1989, 1991) determining codes and habitat types of Europe, in particular involving the division of the latter into sub-types. To avoid the difficulties of classification of the habitat types in different countries the Scientific Working Group, set up by the Habitats Committee (established by Directive 92/43/EEC), expressed in May 1992 the need to prepare a manual for the interpretation of Annex I including habitat type classification. The results of the commission work were development of the two following points with the national experts: (1) The interpretation work on Annex I should primarily focus on the priority habitat types. (2) The CORINE classification (1991 version) provides a basis for a description of the Annex I habitat types; where the experts feel that it is not suitable, an operational scientific description should be produced from the contributions of the national experts. The aim to develop habitat classification in countries of European continent based on the standards of the EUR27 version of the Interpretation Manual includes descriptions of new habitats, which are characteristics to concrete countries. These new habitat types should be accepted by the Commission and to be added to Annex I. Georgia is a country hosting highly diverse habitat types. Some of those are identical to the habitats, which are already included in the Annex I of the Interpretation Manual v. EUR27. Others, such as Colchic broad-leaved mixed forest, dry open woodland, sub-alpine tall herbaceous vegetation, sub-alpine birch krummholz or Caucasian rhododendron shrubbery, should potentially be included in the Annex I as additional habitat types. According to Interpretation Manual habitat classification is based on plant community types. Georgian vegetation is well studied by Georgian botanists (Grossheim et al., 1928; Ketskhoveli, 1959; Kimeridze, 1965, 1966; Dolukhanov, 1989; Nakhutsrishvili, 1999, Kvachakidze, 2009). The information used in this document is obtained by literature indicated in the bibliography section for each habitat type. It is important that habitat types, based on the CORINE biotope classification, are identified based on the vegetation/ plant species composition, and animal communities of the individual habitats provide additional rather than the basic information. For distribution of the most of animal species (excluding highly specialized insect pollinators) more inclusive habitat types are important rather than individual subtypes of vegetation, hence “Biotops”, according to the EU habitat directive terminology. On the other hands, geographic position of an area is more important for many animals with a limited distribution rather than vegetation specifics, due to a more limited population dispersal, especially of small-bodied terrestrial vertebrates, related to the plant species. By this reason, we not only supplied individual habitat types by lists of the most important animal species, but included in addition biotope and geography - based classification of animal habitats, with brief description of inclusive plant communities where applicable. 2 Bibliography: 1. Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora, O.J. L206, 22.07.92. 2. CORINE Biotopes - Technical Handbook, volume 1, p. 73-109, Corine/Biotopes/89-2.2, 19 May 1988. 3. CORINE Biotopes manual, Habitats of the European Community. EUR 12587/3, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 1991. 4. Relation between the Directive 92/43/EEC Annex I habitats and the CORINE habitat list 1991 (EUR 12587/3). 5. Grossheim, A.A., Sosnovski, D.I., Troytski, N.A. 1928. Vegetation of Georgia. Tbilisi, Publishhouse Georg. SSR Planing Commision. 6. Ketskhoveli, N. 1959. Sakartvelos mtsenareuli safari. (Vegetation of Georgia). Publish. Acad. Scien. Georgia, Tbilisi. 7. Kimeridze, K. 1965. Kavkasionis lertsamkuchiani mdeloebi (Festuca varia meadows of the Caucasus). Tbilisi. 8. Dolukhanov, A. 1989. Rastitel’nost’ Gruzii (Vegetation of Georgia). v. 1. Metsniereba, Tbilisi. 9. Nakhutsrishvili G. 1999. The vegetation of Georgia (Caucasus). - Braun-Blanquetia 15:1-74. 10. Kvachakidze, R. 2009. Vegetation of Georgia. Tbilisi, TBG&IB. 11. Tarkhnishvili, D. Kikodze D., eds., Principal characteristics of Georgian Biodiversity. In Natura Caucasica (publication of the NGO CUNA Georgica) vol. 1. No 2. 12. Chatwin, M.E., Kikodze, D., Svanidze, T., Chikvaidze, J., Gvritishvili, M., and Tarkhnishvili, D.N. (Eds.), Georgian Country Biological Diversity Study Report, (1996., Program "Assistance for preparation of Biodiversity Country Study in the Republic of Georgia"), UNEP, Ministry of Environment of Georgia, Noah's Ark Centre for Recovery of Endangered Species; 1997, Tbilisi, Georgia : 74-82. (in Georgian) 13. Tarkhnishvili, D., A. Kandaurov, Z. Gurielidze, and I. Matcharashvili. 1996. Review of Literature and Other Sources about Condition of the Environment on the Territory of Georgia along the Early Oil Transportation Pipeline Corridor and Adjacent Territories from Georgia-Azerbaijan Border to Supsa Terminal. Zoology. pp. 1-53, Tbilisi, GPC: 1-53. 14. Gabrielian, G. (ed.) 1986. Physical Geography of the Caucasus. Yerevan, Publ. Yerevan State Univ. (in Russian). 15. Расс Т.С. – Современные представления о составе ихтиофауны Черного моря и его изменениях. Вопросы ихтиологии, 1987, т. 27, вып.2, изд. «Наука». М. с.179-187. 16. Georgian National Report Black Sea Biological Diversity Georgia, United National Publications, New York, 1998, p.101-106 3 Biotope 1: Coastal and halophitic communities (Habitat categories: Coastal and halophytic habitats and Coastal sand dunes and inland dunes) Black Sea coastline of Georgia stretches at ca. 315 km. Animal composition, to some extent, differs between halophytic, sand, and rocky coastal communities. None of these habitats harbor large mammal species, some of that provide stopover sites for migratory birds. Presence of birds and other vertebrates does not depend on the particular type of the coastal substrate, therefore the species composition is given here irrespective to a particular habitat type. Animal species characteristic for the coastal habitats Nesting and migratory birds (spring counts data): Podiceps cristatus, Podiceps auritus, Puffinus yelkouan, Phalacrocorax carbo, Egretta garzetta, Ardea cinerea, Ardea purpurea, Cosmerodius albus, Plegadis falcinellus, Anas platyrhynchos, Anas acuta, Anas crecca, Anas querquedula, Aythya fuligula, Milvus migrans, Haliaeetus albicilla, Circus aeruginosus, Circus pygargus, Accipiter nisus, Accipiter gentilis, Buteo buteo, Falco tinnunculus, Falco vespertinus, Pluvialis apricaria, Charadrius dubius, Numenius arquata, Calidris alba, Glareola nordmanni, Stercorarius parasiticus, Larus ridibundus, Larus minutus, Sterna sandvicensis., Chlidonias leucopterus, Apus apus, Upupa epops, Alauda arvensis, Hirundo rustica, Delichon urbica, Motacilla alba, Motacilla flava, Turdus merula, Oenanthe oenanthe, Emberiza hortulana, Miliaria calandra, Lanius collurio, L. excubitor, Carduelis chloris, Carduelis spinus, Carduelis carduelis, Passer domesticus, Sturnus vulgaris, Garrulus glandarius, Corvus frugilegus, Corvus corone, Corvus corax,. Terrestrial vertebrates: lake frog (Rana ridibunda), green toad (Bufo viridis), common treefrog (Hyla arborea), in small freshwater bodies entering the channel – smooth and crested newts (Triturus karelinii, Lissotriton vulgaris), sand lizard (Lacerta agilis), ring and dice snakes (Natrix natrix, N. tesselata), European marsh turtle (Emys orbicularis), Caucasian mole (Talpa caucasica), feral cats and dogs, jackal (Canis aureus), feral dogs and cats. Fish species found in the eastern coastal area of the Black Sea: Lampetra mariae, Squalus acanthias, Raja clavata, Dasyatis pastinaca, Huso huso, Acipenser nudiventris, Acipenser guldenstadti, Acipenser sturio, Acipenser stellatus, Sprattus sprattus, Clupeonella cultriventris, Alosa caspia palaeostomi, Alosa pontica, Engraulis encrasicolus, Salmo trutta labrax, Esox lucius, Rutilus rutilus, Leuciscus cephalus, Scardinius erythrophtalmus, Ctenopharyngodon idella, Tinca tinca, Chondrostoma colchicum, Gobio gobio, Varicorhinus sieboldi, Barbus tauricus, Chalcalburnus chalcoides, Alburnus alburnus, Alburnoides bipunctatus, Blicca
Recommended publications
  • Unofficial Working Translation
    UNOFFICIAL WORKING TRANSLATION SETTING OF TARGETS AND EVALUATION OF A PROGRESS TOWARD THE PROTOCOL ON WATER AND HEALTH (GEORGIA) BRIEF REPORT TBILISI 2010 INTRODUCTION A present report has a goal to provide a preliminary assessment of the current situation under requirements of the Protocol on Water and Health in Georgia. It is assumed, that a report would be a source of succinct and useful information allowing an evaluation of a progress on implementation of provisions of the Protocol. It is expected, that a present report will give a chance to evaluate a progress and results of works held in the country and more precisely formulate the particular goals for the future. An approach for the present report is in using of the information stored in different ministries and agencies. Its info is combined from both the public database and the data which is rarely known and taken into account. An additional value of the present report is in its sphere of coverage and a laconism. It means that, despite a report is based on using characteristics, only a limited number of them are included. This is a first report composed similar to the brief reports under the Protocol on Water and Health in compliance with the guidelines on setting of targets, evaluation of progress and reporting for reviewing the issues mentioned in such documents. But, it should be noted, that some issues from the above mentioned documents are not considered in this report due to an absence of the relevant information. The generalised analysis of the issues mentioned in the brief reports is provided within the chapters 1-20.
    [Show full text]
  • Status and Protection of Globally Threatened Species in the Caucasus
    STATUS AND PROTECTION OF GLOBALLY THREATENED SPECIES IN THE CAUCASUS CEPF Biodiversity Investments in the Caucasus Hotspot 2004-2009 Edited by Nugzar Zazanashvili and David Mallon Tbilisi 2009 The contents of this book do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of CEPF, WWF, or their sponsoring organizations. Neither the CEPF, WWF nor any other entities thereof, assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, product or process disclosed in this book. Citation: Zazanashvili, N. and Mallon, D. (Editors) 2009. Status and Protection of Globally Threatened Species in the Caucasus. Tbilisi: CEPF, WWF. Contour Ltd., 232 pp. ISBN 978-9941-0-2203-6 Design and printing Contour Ltd. 8, Kargareteli st., 0164 Tbilisi, Georgia December 2009 The Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund (CEPF) is a joint initiative of l’Agence Française de Développement, Conservation International, the Global Environment Facility, the Government of Japan, the MacArthur Foundation and the World Bank. This book shows the effort of the Caucasus NGOs, experts, scientific institutions and governmental agencies for conserving globally threatened species in the Caucasus: CEPF investments in the region made it possible for the first time to carry out simultaneous assessments of species’ populations at national and regional scales, setting up strategies and developing action plans for their survival, as well as implementation of some urgent conservation measures. Contents Foreword 7 Acknowledgments 8 Introduction CEPF Investment in the Caucasus Hotspot A. W. Tordoff, N. Zazanashvili, M. Bitsadze, K. Manvelyan, E. Askerov, V. Krever, S. Kalem, B. Avcioglu, S. Galstyan and R. Mnatsekanov 9 The Caucasus Hotspot N.
    [Show full text]
  • Institutionalization of Climate Change Adaptation and Mitigation in The
    Institutionalization of Climate Change Adaptation and Mitigation in the Georgian Regions (ICCAMGR) Analysis of the Capacities of the Local Authorities: Environmental and Climate Change Management April 22, 2016 This publication was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development. ANALYSIS OF THE CAPACITIES OF LOCAL AUTHORITIES 2 This Analysis of the Capacities of the Local Authorities: Environmental and Climate Change Management was developed by the Institutionalization of Climate Change Adaptation and Mitigation in Georgian Regions (ICCAMGR) program implemented by the National Association of the Local Authorities of Georgia (NALAG). It falls under Agreement Number AID-114-A-12-00001. This report was made possible through the support of the American people through USAID/Caucasus. Its contents are the sole responsibility of National Association of the Local Authorities of Georgia (NALAG) and ACT and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States Government. Prepared for: USAID/Caucasus American Embassy 11 George Balanchine Street Tbilisi 0131 Georgia Tel: + 995 (32) 254 4147 www.usaid.gov ANALYSIS OF THE CAPACITIES OF LOCAL AUTHORITIES 3 1. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of the United States Agency for International Development’s Georgia Mission (USAID/Caucasus) for this project. In addition, the authors would like to thank the ICCAMGR’s partners and governmental counterparts, the Ministry of Energy and the Ministry of Environment and Resource Protection,
    [Show full text]
  • СИСТЕМАТИКА ТА ФІЛОГЕНЕТИЧНІ ЗВ'язки РОДУ ULMUS L. За Літературними Джерелами Досліджено Філогенетичні Зв'язки Роду Ulmus L
    https://nv.nltu.edu.ua https://doi.org/10.15421/40290510 Article received 22.05.2019 р. S. A. Maslovata Article accepted 30.05.2019 р. [email protected] УДК 582.637.1:57.065 С. А. Масловата, В. Л. Кульбіцький, М. Ю. Осіпов Уманський національний університет садівництва, м. Умань, Україна СИСТЕМАТИКА ТА ФІЛОГЕНЕТИЧНІ ЗВ'ЯЗКИ РОДУ ULMUS L. За літературними джерелами досліджено філогенетичні зв'язки роду Ulmus L. Встановлено за даними бази GRIN, що у світі всього нараховується понад 30 видів роду Ulmus, поширених переважно в помірній зоні північної півкулі. З них 10 трапляються на території України, в помірній зоні європейської частини, на Північному Кавказі, в Забайкаллі та на Дале- кому Сході в широколистяних і хвойно-широколистяних лісах. По берегах річок на півночі зони зростання вклинюються у європейську темнохвойну тайгу, а на півдні – у Степову та Лісостепову зони. Як типові супутні породи мішаних лісів Євро- пи найпоширеніші такі представники роду Ulmus: U. laevis Pall., U. glabra HuDs., U. suberosa moench, U. elliptica K. Koch; в Азії – U. propinqua, U. laciniata (Trautv.) mayr та U. pumila L; у Північній Америці – U. americana L. На території України поширені сім аборигенних видів U. androssowii Litv., U. minor mill., U. glabra HuDs., U. laciniata (Trautv.) mayr, U. laevis Pall., U. macrocarpa Hance, U. pumila L. та три інтродукованих види: U. japonica (RehD.) Sarg., U. americana L. та U. densa Litw. З'ясовано, що номенклатура видів роду Ulmus складна і заплутана. Складність полягає не тільки в народних, але й у латинських назвах. Так, у літературних джерелах виявлено безліч синонімів латинських назв. Причиною, яка ускладнює таксономію в'язів, є поширення процесів природної гібридизації в межах роду Ulmus.
    [Show full text]
  • River Systems and Their Water and Sediment Fluxes Towards the Marine Regions of the Mediterranean Sea and Black Sea Earth System: an Overview
    Review Article Mediterranean Marine Science Indexed in WoS (Web of Science, ISI Thomson) and SCOPUS The journal is available on line at http://www.medit-mar-sc.net DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12681/mms.19514 River systems and their water and sediment fluxes towards the marine regions of the Mediterranean Sea and Black Sea earth system: An overview Serafeim E. POULOS Laboratory of Physical Geography, Section of Geography & Climatology, Department of Geology & Geoenvironment, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, Panepistimioupolis-Zografou, 10584, Attiki Corresponding author: [email protected] Handling Editor: Argyro ZENETOS Received: 22 January 2019; Accepted: 6 July 2019; Published on line: 5 September 2019 Abstract A quantitative assessment of the riverine freshwater, suspended and dissolved sediment loads is provided for the watersheds of the four primary (Western Mediterranean-WMED, Central Mediterranean-CMED, Eastern Mediterranean-EMED and Black Sea- BLS) and eleven secondary marine regions of the Mediterranean and Black Sea Earth System (MBES). On the basis of measured values that cover spatially >65% and >84% of MED and BLS watersheds, respectively, water discharge of the MBES reaches annually almost the 1 million km3, with Mediterranean Sea (including the Marmara Sea) providing 576 km3 and the Black Sea (included the Azov Sea) 418 km3. Among the watersheds of MED primary marine regions, the total water load is distributed as follows: WMED= 180 km3; CMED= 209 km3; and EMED= 187 km3. The MBES could potentially provide annually some 894 106 t of suspended sediment load (SSL), prior to river damming, most of which (i.e., 708 106 t is attributed to MED).
    [Show full text]
  • The Upper Tisa Valley. Preparatory Proposal for Ramsar Site Designation and an Ecological Background Hungarian, Romanian, Slovakian and Ukrainian Co- Operation
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/286732427 The Upper Tisa Valley. Preparatory Proposal for Ramsar Site Designation and an Ecological Background Hungarian, Romanian, Slovakian and Ukrainian co- operation. Book · December 1999 DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.1.3000.3281 CITATIONS READS 14 681 32 authors, including: Ákos Harka Andrey Kovalchuk Hungarian Ichthyological Society Uzhhorod National University 39 PUBLICATIONS 395 CITATIONS 324 PUBLICATIONS 141 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Andriy Mihaly Constantin Drăgulescu Uzhhorod National University Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu 35 PUBLICATIONS 74 CITATIONS 19 PUBLICATIONS 129 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: The Conservation of Insects and Their Habitats View project Environmental history of Hortobágy, Hungary View project All content following this page was uploaded by Andrey Kovalchuk on 13 December 2015. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. monograph series TISCIA The Upper Tisa Valley Preparatory proposal for Ramsar site designation and an ecological background Hungarian, Romanian, Slovakian and Ukrainian co-operation Editors Hamar, J. & A. Sárkány-Kiss Szeged 1999 The Upper Tisa Valley TISCIA monograph series 1. J. Hamar and A. Sárkány-Kiss (eds.): The Maros/Mureş River Valley. A Study of the Geography, Hydrobiology and Ecology of the River and its Environment, 1995. 2. A. Sárkány-Kiss and J. Hamar (eds.): The Criş/Körös Rivers’ Valleys. A Study of the Geography, Hydrobiology and Ecology of the River and its Environment, 1997. 3. A. Sárkány-Kiss and J. Hamar (eds.): The Someş/Szamor River Valleys.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Resources of Georgia and Environmental Protection 2018
    STATISTICAL PUBLICATION | 2018 NATIONAL STATISTICS OFFICE OF GEORGIA Natural Resources of Georgia and Environmental Protection 2018 Statistical Publication TBILISI 2019 1 STATISTICAL PUBLICATION | 2018 Editors: Gogita Todradze Lia Dzebisauri Person responsible for the publication: Irakli Tsikhelashvili Persons worked on the publication: Tamar Tarashvili Nino Zurabishvili Notation keys: ... Data are not available - Magnitude nil Negligible 0.0 magnitude The discrepancy between the totals and the sum in some cases can be explained by using rounded data The data in this publication do not cover uccupied territories of Georgia (Autonomous Republic of Abkhazia and Tskhinvali region) © National Statistic Office of Georgia 30, Tsotne Dadiani Str., 0180, Tbilisi, Georgia Phone/Fax: (+995 32) 2 36 72 10 (500) E-mail: [email protected] Web-page: www.geostat.ge 2 STATISTICAL PUBLICATION | 2018 Foreword Statistical publication "Natural Resources and Environmental Protection of Georgia" presents information on the use of land, forest and water resources, ambient air protection, protected areas, natural disasters and environ- mental violations. It also includes methodological explanations and information from different reference and scien- tific sources. The preparation of this publication is based on the growing interest of a wide range of users, however, the in- formation collected in it, presents the best way of policy planning at local or global levels. In addition, the need to produce environmental indicators is related to the most important issues of global policy, such as climate change and environmental security. The data in the publication reflects the natural resources of Georgia and developed trends of environmental activities in 2000-2018. Substantive comments and suggestions on the format and content of the publication will be highly appreciated by the group of authors.
    [Show full text]
  • Wikivoyage Georgia.Pdf
    WikiVoyage Georgia March 2016 Contents 1 Georgia (country) 1 1.1 Regions ................................................ 1 1.2 Cities ................................................. 1 1.3 Other destinations ........................................... 1 1.4 Understand .............................................. 2 1.4.1 People ............................................. 3 1.5 Get in ................................................. 3 1.5.1 Visas ............................................. 3 1.5.2 By plane ............................................ 4 1.5.3 By bus ............................................. 4 1.5.4 By minibus .......................................... 4 1.5.5 By car ............................................. 4 1.5.6 By train ............................................ 5 1.5.7 By boat ............................................ 5 1.6 Get around ............................................... 5 1.6.1 Taxi .............................................. 5 1.6.2 Minibus ............................................ 5 1.6.3 By train ............................................ 5 1.6.4 By bike ............................................ 5 1.6.5 City Bus ............................................ 5 1.6.6 Mountain Travel ....................................... 6 1.7 Talk .................................................. 6 1.8 See ................................................... 6 1.9 Do ................................................... 7 1.10 Buy .................................................. 7 1.10.1
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Fisheries and Aquaculture Development Potentials in Georgia
    FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Circular No. 1055/1 REU/C1055/1(En) ISSN 2070-6065 REVIEW OF FISHERIES AND AQUACULTURE DEVELOPMENT POTENTIALS IN GEORGIA Copies of FAO publications can be requested from: Sales and Marketing Group Office of Knowledge Exchange, Research and Extension Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations E-mail: [email protected] Fax: +39 06 57053360 Web site: www.fao.org/icatalog/inter-e.htm FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Circular No. 1055/1 REU/C1055/1 (En) REVIEW OF FISHERIES AND AQUACULTURE DEVELOPMENT POTENTIALS IN GEORGIA by Marina Khavtasi † Senior Specialist Department of Integrated Environmental Management and Biodiversity Ministry of the Environment Protection and Natural Resources Tbilisi, Georgia Marina Makarova Head of Division Water Resources Protection Ministry of the Environment Protection and Natural Resources Tbilisi, Georgia Irina Lomashvili Senior Specialist Department of Integrated Environmental Management and Biodiversity Ministry of the Environment Protection and Natural Resources Tbilisi, Georgia Archil Phartsvania National Consultant Thomas Moth-Poulsen Fishery Officer FAO Regional Office for Europe and Central Asia Budapest, Hungary András Woynarovich FAO Consultant FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS Rome, 2010 The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity Assessment for Georgia
    Biodiversity Assessment for Georgia Task Order under the Biodiversity & Sustainable Forestry IQC (BIOFOR) USAID C ONTRACT NUMBER: LAG-I-00-99-00014-00 SUBMITTED TO: USAID WASHINGTON E&E BUREAU, ENVIRONMENT & NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION SUBMITTED BY: CHEMONICS INTERNATIONAL INC. WASHINGTON, D.C. FEBRUARY 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION I INTRODUCTION I-1 SECTION II STATUS OF BIODIVERSITY II-1 A. Overview II-1 B. Main Landscape Zones II-2 C. Species Diversity II-4 SECTION III STATUS OF BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION III-1 A. Protected Areas III-1 B. Conservation Outside Protected Areas III-2 SECTION IV STRATEGIC AND POLICY FRAMEWORK IV-1 A. Policy Framework IV-1 B. Legislative Framework IV-1 C. Institutional Framework IV-4 D. Internationally Supported Projects IV-7 SECTION V SUMMARY OF FINDINGS V-1 SECTION VI RECOMMENDATIONS FOR IMPROVED BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION VI-1 SECTION VII USAID/GEORGIA VII-1 A. Impact of the Program VII-1 B. Recommendations for USAID/Georgia VII-2 ANNEX A SECTIONS 117 AND 119 OF THE FOREIGN ASSISTANCE ACT A-1 ANNEX B SCOPE OF WORK B-1 ANNEX C LIST OF PERSONS CONTACTED C-1 ANNEX D LISTS OF RARE AND ENDANGERED SPECIES OF GEORGIA D-1 ANNEX E MAP OF LANDSCAPE ZONES (BIOMES) OF GEORGIA E-1 ANNEX F MAP OF PROTECTED AREAS OF GEORGIA F-1 ANNEX G PROTECTED AREAS IN GEORGIA G-1 ANNEX H GEORGIA PROTECTED AREAS DEVELOPMENT PROJECT DESIGN SUMMARY H-1 ANNEX I AGROBIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION IN GEORGIA (FROM GEF PDF GRANT PROPOSAL) I-1 SECTION I Introduction This biodiversity assessment for the Republic of Georgia has three interlinked objectives: · Summarizes the status of biodiversity and its conservation in Georgia; analyzes threats, identifies opportunities, and makes recommendations for the improved conservation of biodiversity.
    [Show full text]
  • National Report on the State of the Environment of Georgia
    National Report on the State of the Environment of Georgia 2007 - 2009 FOREWORD This National Report on the State of Environment 2007-2009 has been developed in accordance with the Article 14 of the Law of Georgia on Environmental Protection and the Presidential Decree N 389 of 25 June 1999 on the Rules of Development of National Report on the State of Environment. According to the Georgian legislation, for the purpose of public information the National Report on the State of Environment shall be developed once every three years. 2007-2009 National Report was approved on 9 December 2011. National Report is a summarizing document of all existing information on the state of the environment of Georgia complexly analyzing the state of the environment of Georgia for 2007-2009. The document describes the main directions of environmental policy of the country, presents information on the qualita- tive state of the environment, also presents information on the outcomes of the environmental activities carried out within the frames of international relations, and gives the analysis of environmental impact of different economic sectors. National Report is comprised of 8 Parts and 21 chapters: • Qualitative state of environment (atmospheric air, water resources, land resources, natural disasters, biodiversity, wastes and chemicals, ionizing radiation), • Environmental impact of different economic sectors (agriculture, forestry, transport, industry and en- ergy sector), • Environmental protection management (environmental policy and planning, environmental regula- tion and monitoring, environmental education and awareness raising). In the development of the present State of Environment (SOE) the Ministry of Environment Protection was assisted by the EU funded Project Support to the Improvement of the Environmental Governance in Georgia.
    [Show full text]
  • In This Issue
    No. 41 Spring/Summer 2006 In this Issue: • Climate Change Stories from the Russian Arctic • Studying the Impacts of a Chinese Chemical Spill in Bolonsky Zapovednik • Abkhazia's Ritsinsky Relict National Park • Avian Flu: Russian Policies Raise Concerns PROMOTING BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION IN RUSSIA AND THROUGHOUT NORTHERN EURASIA CONTENTS CONTENTS Voice from the Wild ECOLOGICAL TOURISM (A Letter from the Editors)........................................................1 Encouraging Whale Watching and Marine PROTECTED AREAS Ecotourism in Russia...................................................................15 Bolonsky Zapovednik Studying the Impacts The Great Baikal Trai........................………………………………....18 of a Chinese Chemical Spill ................................………………...2 FOR DISCUSSION Developing and Regulating Tourism: Striking a Delicate Balance in Abkhazia's Avian Flu: Russian Official Ritsinsky Relict National Park.............................……………….5 Policies Raise Concerns................………….………………………..21 ENDANGERED ECOSYSTEMS CONSERVATION HISTORY Pleistocene Park: Return of the Reflections on the Social History Mammoth's Ecosystem.................................................................8 of Pechoro-Ilychsky Zapovednik...........…………………….25 Coastal Dwellers on Russia's ABSTRACTS IN RUSSIAN...............................................29 Chukotka Peninsula Report the Effects of Climate Change...........................12 CONSERVATION CONTACTS..............Back Cover Russian Conservation News is produced with
    [Show full text]