DOCSLIB.ORG

2015.11.16 EIA Lakhami HPP Cascade Engl

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2015.11.16 EIA Lakhami HPP Cascade Engl EIA Lakhami 1-2 HPP 1/ 384 “Austrian Georgian Development” LLC Construction and Operation Project of HPP Cascades (Lakhami 1 HPP with installed capacity of 6,4 MW, Lakhami 2 HPP with installed capacity of 9,5 MW) on the riv. Lakhami in Mestia Municipality Environmental Impact Assessment Report (Preliminary Version) Executor “Gamma Consulting” Ltd. Director V. Gvakharia Tbilisi 2015 Gamma Consulting EIA Lakhami 1-2 HPP 2/ 384 GAMMA Consulting Ltd. 17a. Guramishvili av, 0192, Tbilisi, Georgia Tel: +(995 32) 260 44 33 +(995 32) 260 15 27 E-mail: [email protected] www.gamma.ge; www.facebook.com/gammaconsultingGeorgia Table of Contents 1 Introduction ...................................................................................................... 10 1.1 General Review ................................................................................................................................................ 10 1.2 EIA Preparation Basis ...................................................................................................................................... 11 1.3 Objectives of the EIA ...................................................................................................................................... 11 2 Legislative Framework ....................................................................................... 12 2.1 Environmental Legislation of Georgia ............................................................................................................ 12 2.2 Environmental Standards of Georgia ............................................................................................................. 13 2.3 International Agreements ............................................................................................................................... 14 3 Project Description ............................................................................................ 15 3.1 General Review ................................................................................................................................................ 15 3.2 Brief Description of Infrastructural Facilities of the HPP Cascade .............................................................. 21 3.2.1 Lakhami 1 HPP ............................................................................................................................................ 21 3.2.2 Lakhami 2 HPP ............................................................................................................................................ 28 3.3 Fishway ............................................................................................................................................................ 30 3.4 Organization of Construction Works ............................................................................................................. 32 3.4.1 General Review ........................................................................................................................................... 32 3.4.2 Construction Camps .................................................................................................................................... 32 3.4.2.1 Concrete Plant .................................................................................................................................... 35 3.4.3 Access Roads ................................................................................................................................................ 35 3.4.3.1 Brief Description of the Project on Rehabilitation of Existing Road and Bridges within Lakhami River Valley .......................................................................................................................................................... 36 3.4.4 Removal of Vegetation Cover and Humus Layer of Soil .......................................................................... 37 3.4.5 Personnel Training and Qualification ........................................................................................................ 37 3.4.6 Local Construction Materials ...................................................................................................................... 38 3.4.7 Description of Main Construction Works and Relevant Requirements .................................................. 38 3.4.7.1 Ground Works .................................................................................................................................... 38 3.4.7.2 Concrete Works .................................................................................................................................. 40 3.4.8 Occupational Safety .................................................................................................................................... 43 3.4.9 Recultivation Works ................................................................................................................................... 44 3.5 Water Supply and Sewage System .................................................................................................................. 44 3.5.1 Construction Phase ..................................................................................................................................... 44 3.5.2 Operation Phase .......................................................................................................................................... 45 3.6 Power Supply ................................................................................................................................................... 46 3.7 Expected Waste ................................................................................................................................................ 46 3.7.1 Waste Expected on Construction Phase .................................................................................................... 46 3.7.2 Waste Expected on Operation Phase ......................................................................................................... 47 4 Environmental Baseline Conditions .................................................................... 47 Gamma Consulting EIA Lakhami 1-2 HPP 3/ 384 4.1 General Review ................................................................................................................................................ 47 4.2 Description of Physical-Geographical Environment ..................................................................................... 49 4.2.1 Climate and Meteorological Conditions .................................................................................................... 49 4.2.1.1 Ambient Air Temperature (0C) .......................................................................................................... 50 4.2.1.2 Relative Humidity (%) ....................................................................................................................... 50 4.2.1.3 Precipitation, mm ............................................................................................................................... 51 4.2.1.4 Snow Cover ......................................................................................................................................... 51 4.2.1.5 Wind Characteristics .......................................................................................................................... 51 4.2.1.6 Normative Depth of Seasonal Freezing of Soils, cm ......................................................................... 52 4.2.2 Geological Environment ............................................................................................................................. 53 4.2.2.1 Geomorphology .................................................................................................................................. 53 4.2.2.2 General Geological Composition of the Region ............................................................................... 54 4.2.2.3 Engineering Geological Conditions ................................................................................................... 56 4.2.2.3.1 Engineering Geological Survey – I Phase .................................................................................... 56 4.2.2.3.1.1 Construction Site of Lakhami 1 HPP Headworks ................................................................ 57 4.2.2.3.1.2 Penstock Corridor of Lakhami 1 HPP .................................................................................. 58 4.2.2.3.1.3 Lakhami 1 HPP Building and Lakhami 2 HPP Headworks ................................................ 58 4.2.2.3.1.4 Penstock Corridor of Lakhami 2 HP ..................................................................................... 59 4.2.2.3.1.5 Lakhami 2 HPP Building ....................................................................................................... 60 4.2.2.3.1.6 Conclusions ............................................................................................................................ 61 4.2.2.3.2 Phase II of the Engineering-Geological Survey (Detailed Study) .............................................. 62 4.2.2.3.2.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 62 4.2.2.3.2.2 Lakhami HPP 1 .....................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Some Remarks on the Current Efforts for Future Protection of the Kura Water Resources Through Trans-Boundary Cooperation and Modernized National Policy Measures
    International Journal of Hydrology Case Report Open Access Some remarks on the current efforts for future protection of the kura water resources through trans-boundary cooperation and modernized national policy measures Abstract Volume 1 Issue 4 - 2017 Azerbaijan locates in the downstream of the Kura river basin. Protection of the bio- Mehman Agarza Oglu Rzayev resources of the Kura River is important for the future welfare and health of the Department of Agricultural Water and Soil, Azerbaijan Scientific- population living in this basin. Therefore coordinated action for the rational use of Production Association of Hydraulic Engineering and Amelioration, the water resources between basin countries is necessary to mitigate main trans- Azerbaijan boundary problems of changes in hydrological flows, worsening of the river water quality, degradation of the ecosystem and intensified flooding due to the observed Correspondence: Mehman Agarza oglu Rzayev, Department consequence of global climate changes taking place in the recent period. This of Agricultural Water and Soil, Azerbaijan Scientific-Production manuscript outlines the proposals within UNDP-GEF Kura - Araz Project ((Kura II Association of Hydraulic Engineering and Amelioration, Project) to improve interaction and cooperation between Azerbaijan and Georgia as a Azerbaijan, Tel +994503246061, Email [email protected] model for future deepening of the relationship between all basin countries to protect fresh water resources and ecological safety of the entire river ecosystem. Received: September 04, 2017 | Published: November 10, 2017 Introduction industrial wastewaters and return flow from agriculture, imposing health, ecological and aesthetic threats. Water pollution takes place Kura River is the main waterway in Caucasus area, originates from due to the mining industry, agriculture and livestock activities starting eastern Turkey, with the total length of 1515 km and inflow to the from the upstream basin countries.4,5 The cooperation between the Caspian Sea through Georgia and Azerbaijan.
    [Show full text]
  • Status and Protection of Globally Threatened Species in the Caucasus
    STATUS AND PROTECTION OF GLOBALLY THREATENED SPECIES IN THE CAUCASUS CEPF Biodiversity Investments in the Caucasus Hotspot 2004-2009 Edited by Nugzar Zazanashvili and David Mallon Tbilisi 2009 The contents of this book do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of CEPF, WWF, or their sponsoring organizations. Neither the CEPF, WWF nor any other entities thereof, assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, product or process disclosed in this book. Citation: Zazanashvili, N. and Mallon, D. (Editors) 2009. Status and Protection of Globally Threatened Species in the Caucasus. Tbilisi: CEPF, WWF. Contour Ltd., 232 pp. ISBN 978-9941-0-2203-6 Design and printing Contour Ltd. 8, Kargareteli st., 0164 Tbilisi, Georgia December 2009 The Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund (CEPF) is a joint initiative of l’Agence Française de Développement, Conservation International, the Global Environment Facility, the Government of Japan, the MacArthur Foundation and the World Bank. This book shows the effort of the Caucasus NGOs, experts, scientific institutions and governmental agencies for conserving globally threatened species in the Caucasus: CEPF investments in the region made it possible for the first time to carry out simultaneous assessments of species’ populations at national and regional scales, setting up strategies and developing action plans for their survival, as well as implementation of some urgent conservation measures. Contents Foreword 7 Acknowledgments 8 Introduction CEPF Investment in the Caucasus Hotspot A. W. Tordoff, N. Zazanashvili, M. Bitsadze, K. Manvelyan, E. Askerov, V. Krever, S. Kalem, B. Avcioglu, S. Galstyan and R. Mnatsekanov 9 The Caucasus Hotspot N.
    [Show full text]
  • Institutionalization of Climate Change Adaptation and Mitigation in The
    Institutionalization of Climate Change Adaptation and Mitigation in the Georgian Regions (ICCAMGR) Analysis of the Capacities of the Local Authorities: Environmental and Climate Change Management April 22, 2016 This publication was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development. ANALYSIS OF THE CAPACITIES OF LOCAL AUTHORITIES 2 This Analysis of the Capacities of the Local Authorities: Environmental and Climate Change Management was developed by the Institutionalization of Climate Change Adaptation and Mitigation in Georgian Regions (ICCAMGR) program implemented by the National Association of the Local Authorities of Georgia (NALAG). It falls under Agreement Number AID-114-A-12-00001. This report was made possible through the support of the American people through USAID/Caucasus. Its contents are the sole responsibility of National Association of the Local Authorities of Georgia (NALAG) and ACT and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States Government. Prepared for: USAID/Caucasus American Embassy 11 George Balanchine Street Tbilisi 0131 Georgia Tel: + 995 (32) 254 4147 www.usaid.gov ANALYSIS OF THE CAPACITIES OF LOCAL AUTHORITIES 3 1. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of the United States Agency for International Development’s Georgia Mission (USAID/Caucasus) for this project. In addition, the authors would like to thank the ICCAMGR’s partners and governmental counterparts, the Ministry of Energy and the Ministry of Environment and Resource Protection,
    [Show full text]
  • СИСТЕМАТИКА ТА ФІЛОГЕНЕТИЧНІ ЗВ'язки РОДУ ULMUS L. За Літературними Джерелами Досліджено Філогенетичні Зв'язки Роду Ulmus L
    https://nv.nltu.edu.ua https://doi.org/10.15421/40290510 Article received 22.05.2019 р. S. A. Maslovata Article accepted 30.05.2019 р. [email protected] УДК 582.637.1:57.065 С. А. Масловата, В. Л. Кульбіцький, М. Ю. Осіпов Уманський національний університет садівництва, м. Умань, Україна СИСТЕМАТИКА ТА ФІЛОГЕНЕТИЧНІ ЗВ'ЯЗКИ РОДУ ULMUS L. За літературними джерелами досліджено філогенетичні зв'язки роду Ulmus L. Встановлено за даними бази GRIN, що у світі всього нараховується понад 30 видів роду Ulmus, поширених переважно в помірній зоні північної півкулі. З них 10 трапляються на території України, в помірній зоні європейської частини, на Північному Кавказі, в Забайкаллі та на Дале- кому Сході в широколистяних і хвойно-широколистяних лісах. По берегах річок на півночі зони зростання вклинюються у європейську темнохвойну тайгу, а на півдні – у Степову та Лісостепову зони. Як типові супутні породи мішаних лісів Євро- пи найпоширеніші такі представники роду Ulmus: U. laevis Pall., U. glabra HuDs., U. suberosa moench, U. elliptica K. Koch; в Азії – U. propinqua, U. laciniata (Trautv.) mayr та U. pumila L; у Північній Америці – U. americana L. На території України поширені сім аборигенних видів U. androssowii Litv., U. minor mill., U. glabra HuDs., U. laciniata (Trautv.) mayr, U. laevis Pall., U. macrocarpa Hance, U. pumila L. та три інтродукованих види: U. japonica (RehD.) Sarg., U. americana L. та U. densa Litw. З'ясовано, що номенклатура видів роду Ulmus складна і заплутана. Складність полягає не тільки в народних, але й у латинських назвах. Так, у літературних джерелах виявлено безліч синонімів латинських назв. Причиною, яка ускладнює таксономію в'язів, є поширення процесів природної гібридизації в межах роду Ulmus.
    [Show full text]
  • River Systems and Their Water and Sediment Fluxes Towards the Marine Regions of the Mediterranean Sea and Black Sea Earth System: an Overview
    Review Article Mediterranean Marine Science Indexed in WoS (Web of Science, ISI Thomson) and SCOPUS The journal is available on line at http://www.medit-mar-sc.net DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12681/mms.19514 River systems and their water and sediment fluxes towards the marine regions of the Mediterranean Sea and Black Sea earth system: An overview Serafeim E. POULOS Laboratory of Physical Geography, Section of Geography & Climatology, Department of Geology & Geoenvironment, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, Panepistimioupolis-Zografou, 10584, Attiki Corresponding author: [email protected] Handling Editor: Argyro ZENETOS Received: 22 January 2019; Accepted: 6 July 2019; Published on line: 5 September 2019 Abstract A quantitative assessment of the riverine freshwater, suspended and dissolved sediment loads is provided for the watersheds of the four primary (Western Mediterranean-WMED, Central Mediterranean-CMED, Eastern Mediterranean-EMED and Black Sea- BLS) and eleven secondary marine regions of the Mediterranean and Black Sea Earth System (MBES). On the basis of measured values that cover spatially >65% and >84% of MED and BLS watersheds, respectively, water discharge of the MBES reaches annually almost the 1 million km3, with Mediterranean Sea (including the Marmara Sea) providing 576 km3 and the Black Sea (included the Azov Sea) 418 km3. Among the watersheds of MED primary marine regions, the total water load is distributed as follows: WMED= 180 km3; CMED= 209 km3; and EMED= 187 km3. The MBES could potentially provide annually some 894 106 t of suspended sediment load (SSL), prior to river damming, most of which (i.e., 708 106 t is attributed to MED).
    [Show full text]
  • The Upper Tisa Valley. Preparatory Proposal for Ramsar Site Designation and an Ecological Background Hungarian, Romanian, Slovakian and Ukrainian Co- Operation
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/286732427 The Upper Tisa Valley. Preparatory Proposal for Ramsar Site Designation and an Ecological Background Hungarian, Romanian, Slovakian and Ukrainian co- operation. Book · December 1999 DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.1.3000.3281 CITATIONS READS 14 681 32 authors, including: Ákos Harka Andrey Kovalchuk Hungarian Ichthyological Society Uzhhorod National University 39 PUBLICATIONS 395 CITATIONS 324 PUBLICATIONS 141 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Andriy Mihaly Constantin Drăgulescu Uzhhorod National University Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu 35 PUBLICATIONS 74 CITATIONS 19 PUBLICATIONS 129 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: The Conservation of Insects and Their Habitats View project Environmental history of Hortobágy, Hungary View project All content following this page was uploaded by Andrey Kovalchuk on 13 December 2015. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. monograph series TISCIA The Upper Tisa Valley Preparatory proposal for Ramsar site designation and an ecological background Hungarian, Romanian, Slovakian and Ukrainian co-operation Editors Hamar, J. & A. Sárkány-Kiss Szeged 1999 The Upper Tisa Valley TISCIA monograph series 1. J. Hamar and A. Sárkány-Kiss (eds.): The Maros/Mureş River Valley. A Study of the Geography, Hydrobiology and Ecology of the River and its Environment, 1995. 2. A. Sárkány-Kiss and J. Hamar (eds.): The Criş/Körös Rivers’ Valleys. A Study of the Geography, Hydrobiology and Ecology of the River and its Environment, 1997. 3. A. Sárkány-Kiss and J. Hamar (eds.): The Someş/Szamor River Valleys.
    [Show full text]
  • Kırklareli İlinde 2016 Yılında Evsel Isınmada Kullanılan Katı Yakıtların Cinsi, Yakıtların Özellikleri Ve Bu Yakıtların Temin Edildiği Yerler
    T.C KIRKLARELİ VALİLİĞİ ÇEVRE VE ŞEHİRCİLİK İL MÜDÜRLÜĞÜ KIRKLARELİ İLİ 2016 YILI ÇEVRE DURUM RAPORU HAZIRLAYAN : T.C. KIRKLARELİ VALİLİĞİ ÇEVRE VE ŞEHİRCİLİK İL MÜDÜRLÜĞÜ ÇED, İZİN VE DENETİM ŞUBE MÜDÜRLÜĞÜ KIRKLARELİ-2017 ÖNSÖZ Çevre kirliliği, her anımızı etkileyen sağlıklı bir yaşam konusudur. Bu nedenle çevrenin korunmasına yönelik yapılacak her faaliyet, atılacak her adım insanlık için çok önemlidir. Çevre kirliliğinin ve çevresel tahribatın önlenmesi yönünde, İl Müdürlüğümüz tarafından, çevre mevzuatı kapsamındaki denetim/kontrol faaliyetlerine titizlikle devam edilmekte, özellikle, hava, su, toprak ve gürültü kirliliğinin önlenmesi, kırsal ve kentsel alanda arazinin ve doğal kaynakların en uygun şekilde kullanılması ve korunması için çalışmalar sürmektedir. Bu çalışmalar kapsamında, hava kalitesini korumak ve kirliliği önlemek amacıyla ilimizdeki kömür satıcıları ve satılan kömürlerin kontrol/ denetimleri yapılmakta, yetkisiz kömür satışına izin verilmemektedir. İlgili yönetmelik kapsamındaki sanayi tesislerince, periyodik olarak sunulan baca gazı çıkış değerlerinin mevzuata uygunluğu değerlendirilmektedir. Yer seçimi çalışması tamamlanan ve Şubat 2007’de hizmete giren Hava Kalitesi Ölçüm İstasyonu ile yapılacak sürekli ölçümlerle, havadaki SO2 (kükürtdioksit) ve partikül madde (toz) miktarı ölçülerek ve gerekli tedbirlerin zaman kaybetmeden alınması sağlanmaktadır. Ergene Nehri kirliliğinin izleme ve kontrol çalışmaları kapsamında; her yıl nehrin ilimize giriş ve çıkış noktalarından su numuneleri alınarak, sonuçları izlenmektedir.
    [Show full text]
  • Double Origin of the Racer Goby (Babka Gymnotrachelus) in Poland Revealed with Mitochondrial Marker
    J. Limnol., 2016; 75(1): 101-108 ORIGINAL ARTICLE DOI: 10.4081/jlimnol.2015.1253 Double origin of the racer goby (Babka gymnotrachelus) in Poland revealed with mitochondrial marker. Possible implications for the species alien/native status Michał GRABOWSKI,1* Kamil HUPAŁO,1 Aneta BYLAK,2 Krzysztof KUKUŁA,2 Joanna GRABOWSKA3 1Department of Invertebrate Zoology and Hydrobiology, University of Lodz, Banacha 12/16, 90-237 Lodz; 2Department of Environmental Biology, University of Rzeszow, Zelwerowicza 4, 35-601 Rzeszow; 3Department of Ecology and Vertebrate Zoology, University of Lodz, Banacha 12/16, 90-237 Lodz, Poland *Corresponding author: [email protected] ABSTRACT In mid-1990s racer goby (Babka gymnotrachelus) penetrated to the Vistula and Western Bug rivers in Poland through the canal connecting the Baltic and the Black Sea basins, namely the Vistula and Dnieper drainages. In early 2000s, the species was reported from Polish section of the Strwiąż River that is an affluent of the Dniester River that drains to the Black Sea basin. According to the Polish legislation, the racer goby has been enlisted as an alien invasive species that may pose threat to local biota. Our analysis of the mtDNA cytochrome b diversity revealed that the Vistula/Western Bug and Strwiąż populationsonly are different genetic units. First one orig- inated from the Dnieper River, while the second derives from the Dniester River. According to the results of mismatch analysis, both are in the stage of demographic and spatial expansion. The haplotype frequencies in population from the Vistula/Western Bug differ signif- icantly from those in the source population in Dnieper, suggesting founder effect, possibly due to human-mediated introduction of low number of individuals.
    [Show full text]
  • A Dissertation Entitled Evolution, Systematics
    A Dissertation Entitled Evolution, systematics, and phylogeography of Ponto-Caspian gobies (Benthophilinae: Gobiidae: Teleostei) By Matthew E. Neilson Submitted as partial fulfillment of the requirements for The Doctor of Philosophy Degree in Biology (Ecology) ____________________________________ Adviser: Dr. Carol A. Stepien ____________________________________ Committee Member: Dr. Christine M. Mayer ____________________________________ Committee Member: Dr. Elliot J. Tramer ____________________________________ Committee Member: Dr. David J. Jude ____________________________________ Committee Member: Dr. Juan L. Bouzat ____________________________________ College of Graduate Studies The University of Toledo December 2009 Copyright © 2009 This document is copyrighted material. Under copyright law, no parts of this document may be reproduced without the expressed permission of the author. _______________________________________________________________________ An Abstract of Evolution, systematics, and phylogeography of Ponto-Caspian gobies (Benthophilinae: Gobiidae: Teleostei) Matthew E. Neilson Submitted as partial fulfillment of the requirements for The Doctor of Philosophy Degree in Biology (Ecology) The University of Toledo December 2009 The study of biodiversity, at multiple hierarchical levels, provides insight into the evolutionary history of taxa and provides a framework for understanding patterns in ecology. This is especially poignant in invasion biology, where the prevalence of invasiveness in certain taxonomic groups could
    [Show full text]
  • Development of Draft the River Basin Management Plan for Khrami-Debeda River Basin
    European Union Water Initiative Plus for Eastern Partnership Countries (EUWI+) Results 2 and 3 DEVELOPMENT OF DRAFT THE RIVER BASIN MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR KHRAMI-DEBEDA RIVER BASIN CONSULTATION ON THE PROGRAMME OF MEASURES REPORT 1 October 2020 Beneficiaries Ministry of Environmental Protection and Agriculture of Georgia (MEPA) Responsible EU member state consortium project leader Mr Alexander Zinke, Umweltbundesamt GmbH (AT) EUWI+ country representative in Georgia Zurab Jincharadze Responsible international thematic lead expert Yannick Pochon; Office International de l’Eau (FR) Responsible Georgian thematic lead expert Mariam Makarova, MEPA Author Keti Jibladze, the Regional Environmental Centre for the Caucasus Disclaimer: The EU-funded programme European Union Water Initiative Plus for Eastern Partnership Countries (EUWI+) is implemented by the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE), the Organisation for Eco- nomic Co-operation and Development (OECD), both responsible for the implementation of Result 1, and an EU member state consortium comprising the Environment Agency Austria (UBA, Austria), the lead coordinator, and the International Office for Water (OiEau, France), both responsible for the implementation of Results 2 and 3. The programme is co-funded by Austria and France through the Austrian Development Agency and the French Artois-Picardie Water Agency. This document was produced with the financial assistance of the European Union. The views expressed herein can in no way be taken to reflect the official opinion of the European Union or the governments of the Eastern Partnership Countries. This document and any map included herein are without prejudice to the status of, or sovereignty over, any territory, to the delimitation of international frontiers and boundaries, and to the name of any territory, city or area.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecologia Balkanica
    ECOLOGIA BALKANICA International Scientific Research Journal of Ecology Volume 5, Issue 2 December 2013 UNION OF SCIENTISTS IN BULGARIA – PLOVDIV UNIVERSITY OF PLOVDIV PUBLISHING HOUSE ii International Standard Serial Number Print ISSN 1314-0213; Online ISSN 1313-9940 Aim & Scope „Ecologia Balkanica” is an international scientific journal, in which original research articles in various fields of Ecology are published, including ecology and conservation of microorganisms, plants, aquatic and terrestrial animals, physiological ecology, behavioural ecology, population ecology, population genetics, community ecology, plant-animal interactions, ecosystem ecology, parasitology, animal evolution, ecological monitoring and bioindication, landscape and urban ecology, conservation ecology, as well as new methodical contributions in ecology. Studies conducted on the Balkans are a priority, but studies conducted in Europe or anywhere else in the World is accepted as well. Published by the Union of Scientists in Bulgaria – Plovdiv and the University of Plovdiv Publishing house – twice a year. Language: English. Peer review process All articles included in “Ecologia Balkanica” are peer reviewed. Submitted manuscripts are sent to two or three independent peer reviewers, unless they are either out of scope or below threshold for the journal. These manuscripts will generally be reviewed by experts with the aim of reaching a first decision as soon as possible. The journal uses the double anonymity standard for the peer-review process. Reviewers do not have to sign their reports and they do not know who the author(s) of the submitted manuscript are. We ask all authors to provide the contact details (including e-mail addresses) of at least four potential reviewers of their manuscript.
    [Show full text]
  • Overview of the Armenian-Georgian Water Cooperation
    Bi-lateral Meeting between Armenia and Georgia on Cooperation in the Khrami-Debed River Basin OVERVIEW OF THE ARMENIAN-GEORGIAN WATER COOPERATION Vahagn Tonoyan EUWI+ Project Local Representative in Armenia Yerevan, 14 October 2019 REGIONAL/TRANSBOUNDARY PROJECTS • Water Management in the South Caucasus (USAID, 2001-2004) • Joint River Management Programme on Monitoring and Assessment of Water Quality on Transboundary Rivers (EU TACIS, 2002-2003) • Trans-boundary Cooperation for Hazard Prevention in the Kura-river Basin (Federal Environmental Agency of Germany, 2003-2006) • Science for Peace Program - South Caucasus River Monitoring (NATO/ OSCE, 2002-2008) • Development of Transboundary Cooperation for Hazard Prevention in Kura-Aras Basin countries (German Ministry of Environment, 2003- 2006) • Reducing Transboundary Degradation in the Kura-Aras Basin. UNDP/GEF. 2003-2008 • South Caucasus Water Program (USAID, 2005-2008) 2 REGIONAL/TRANSBOUNDARY PROJECTS (CONTINUED) • Water Governance Project (EU/TACIS, 2008-2010) • Trans Boundary River Management Phase II for the Kura River (EU/TACIS, 2008-2011) • Fostering Transboundary Cooperation in the Kura-Aras River Basin (UNDP/ENVSEC, 2010-2011) • Trans Boundary River Management Phase III for the Kura River (EU/TACIS, 2012-2013) • Reducing Transboundary Degradation in the Kura-Aras Basin (UNDP/GEF, 2011-2014) • Environmental Protection for International River Basins (EU, 2012- 2016) • European Union Water Initiative Plus for Eastern Partnership (EU, 2016-2020) 3 STRATEGIES FOR PROMOTING TRANSBOUNDARY
    [Show full text]