DOCSLIB.ORG

Development of Draft the River Basin Management Plan for Khrami-Debeda River Basin

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Development of Draft the River Basin Management Plan for Khrami-Debeda River Basin European Union Water Initiative Plus for Eastern Partnership Countries (EUWI+) Results 2 and 3 DEVELOPMENT OF DRAFT THE RIVER BASIN MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR KHRAMI-DEBEDA RIVER BASIN CONSULTATION ON THE PROGRAMME OF MEASURES REPORT 1 October 2020 Beneficiaries Ministry of Environmental Protection and Agriculture of Georgia (MEPA) Responsible EU member state consortium project leader Mr Alexander Zinke, Umweltbundesamt GmbH (AT) EUWI+ country representative in Georgia Zurab Jincharadze Responsible international thematic lead expert Yannick Pochon; Office International de l’Eau (FR) Responsible Georgian thematic lead expert Mariam Makarova, MEPA Author Keti Jibladze, the Regional Environmental Centre for the Caucasus Disclaimer: The EU-funded programme European Union Water Initiative Plus for Eastern Partnership Countries (EUWI+) is implemented by the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE), the Organisation for Eco- nomic Co-operation and Development (OECD), both responsible for the implementation of Result 1, and an EU member state consortium comprising the Environment Agency Austria (UBA, Austria), the lead coordinator, and the International Office for Water (OiEau, France), both responsible for the implementation of Results 2 and 3. The programme is co-funded by Austria and France through the Austrian Development Agency and the French Artois-Picardie Water Agency. This document was produced with the financial assistance of the European Union. The views expressed herein can in no way be taken to reflect the official opinion of the European Union or the governments of the Eastern Partnership Countries. This document and any map included herein are without prejudice to the status of, or sovereignty over, any territory, to the delimitation of international frontiers and boundaries, and to the name of any territory, city or area. Imprint Owner and Editor: EU Member State Consortium Office International de’l Eau (OiEau) 21/23 rue de Madrid 75008 Paris, FRANCE Responsible OiEau Communication officer: Chloe Dechelette [email protected] October 2020 Second Consultation Meeting for Khrami-Debeda River Basin Managent Plan CONTENTS 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................... 7 2 CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVES OF PUBLIC PARTICIPATION ......................................................... 8 2.1 General context .......................................................................................................................... 8 2.1.1 Access to information ....................................................................................................... 8 2.1.2 Public participation ........................................................................................................... 8 2.2 Objectives of public consultation for Khrami-Debeda river basin ............................................... 9 3 PUBLIC CONSULTATION MEETING .............................................................................................. 10 3.1 Summary of the meeting........................................................................................................... 10 3.1.1 First session on Programme of Measures ..................................................................... 10 3.1.2 Second session on Economic Analysis of the Programme of Measures ....................... 10 3.1.3 Questions raised............................................................................................................. 11 3.2 Social media and press coverage ............................................................................................ 11 4 PUBLIC CONSULTATION THROUGH QUESTIONNAIRES .......................................................... 14 4.1 Preparation and dissemination ................................................................................................. 14 4.2 Main outcomes of the questionnaire analysis .......................................................................... 14 5 LESSONS LEARNT FROM THE PUBLIC CONSULTATION PROCESS ....................................... 16 6 public INFORMATION CAMPAIGN.................................................................................................. 17 6.1 Objectives, material and dissemination channels .................................................................... 17 6.2 Outcomes and lessons learnt ................................................................................................... 18 7 ANNEXES ........................................................................................................................................ 19 7.1 Table “comments to the draft RBMP” ....................................................................................... 20 7.2 Agenda...................................................................................................................................... 20 7.3 List of participants ..................................................................................................................... 22 7.4 Questionnaire ........................................................................................................................... 28 3 Second Consultation Meeting for Khrami-Debeda River Basin Management Plan Abbreviations ADA ...................... Austrian Development Agency DG NEAR ............. Directorate-General for Neighbourhood and Enlargement Negotiations of the European Commission EaP ....................... Eastern Partnership EC ......................... European Commission EMBLAS ............... Environmental Monitoring in the Black Sea ESCS .................... Ecological Status Classification Systems EU ......................... European Union EU-MS .................. EU-Member States EUWI+ .................. European Union Water Initiative Plus FD ......................... Floods Directive GEF ...................... Global Environmental Fund IOWater/OIEau .... International Office for Water, France IWRM .................... Integrated Water Resources Management MSFD .................... Marine Strategy Framework Directive NESB .................... National Executive Steering Board NFP ....................... National Focal Point NGOs .................... Non-Governmental Organisations NPD ...................... National Policy Dialogue OECD ................... Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development RBC ...................... River Basin Council RBD ...................... River Basin District RBMP ................... River Basin Management Plan RBO ...................... River Basin Organisation ROM ..................... Result Oriented Monitoring SCM ...................... Steering Committee Meeting (of the EU Action EUWI+) SEIS ..................... Shared environmental information system TA ......................... Technical Assistance ToR ....................... Terms of References UBA ...................... Umweltbundesamt GmbH, Environment Agency Austria UNDP .................... United Nations Development Programme UNECE ................. United Nations Economic Commission for Europe WISE ..................... Water Information System for Europe WFD ...................... Water Framework Directive 4 Second Consultation Meeting for Khrami-Debeda River Basin Managent Plan Country Specific Abbreviations Georgia GA ......................... Georgian Amelioration MEPA .................... Ministry of Environment Protection and Agriculture NEA ...................... National Environment Agency UWSCG ................ United Water Supply Company of Georgia 5 Second Consultation Meeting for Alazani-Iori River Basin Management Plan 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report gives the main conclusions of the second public consultation process (programme of measures) for the Khrami-Debeda River Basin Management Plan (RBMP) carried out in the Khrami-Debeda river basin district from 7 July to 24 August 2020. This report includes feedback received from meetings and questionnaires, as well as the results of the information campaign carried out during this second consultation phase on the programme of measures. 27 opinions on water management were expressed by stakeholders and the public through questionnaires and online meetings. REC Caucasus Georgia, the local consultant for the EUWI+ project, conducted the consultation process and analysed the feedback received. The results of the consultation should be taken into account in the final Khrami-Debeda RBMP and during its implementation phase from 2021 to 2026. Due to the COVID-19, priority was given to online consultation (online questionnaire and mailing campaign). Physical meetings with regional authorities could not be organised in line with the health protocol required by the Georgian government at that time. Therefore, the public consultation meeting with the key stake- holders of Khrami-Debeda RBMP was held online. 7 Second Consultation Meeting for Khrami-debeda River Basin Management Plan 2 CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVES OF PUBLIC PARTICIPATION 2.1 General context According to EU WFD requirements, and particularly Article 14, all stakeholders, for example NGOs, local communities and water supply companies, should be involved in discussions leading to the formulation of the river basin management plan (RBMP) during its three phases of development: timetable and work pro- gramme, main issues, draft RBMP and programme of measures. The action required and targeted public differ, and range from public information to active
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Some Remarks on the Current Efforts for Future Protection of the Kura Water Resources Through Trans-Boundary Cooperation and Modernized National Policy Measures
    International Journal of Hydrology Case Report Open Access Some remarks on the current efforts for future protection of the kura water resources through trans-boundary cooperation and modernized national policy measures Abstract Volume 1 Issue 4 - 2017 Azerbaijan locates in the downstream of the Kura river basin. Protection of the bio- Mehman Agarza Oglu Rzayev resources of the Kura River is important for the future welfare and health of the Department of Agricultural Water and Soil, Azerbaijan Scientific- population living in this basin. Therefore coordinated action for the rational use of Production Association of Hydraulic Engineering and Amelioration, the water resources between basin countries is necessary to mitigate main trans- Azerbaijan boundary problems of changes in hydrological flows, worsening of the river water quality, degradation of the ecosystem and intensified flooding due to the observed Correspondence: Mehman Agarza oglu Rzayev, Department consequence of global climate changes taking place in the recent period. This of Agricultural Water and Soil, Azerbaijan Scientific-Production manuscript outlines the proposals within UNDP-GEF Kura - Araz Project ((Kura II Association of Hydraulic Engineering and Amelioration, Project) to improve interaction and cooperation between Azerbaijan and Georgia as a Azerbaijan, Tel +994503246061, Email [email protected] model for future deepening of the relationship between all basin countries to protect fresh water resources and ecological safety of the entire river ecosystem. Received: September 04, 2017 | Published: November 10, 2017 Introduction industrial wastewaters and return flow from agriculture, imposing health, ecological and aesthetic threats. Water pollution takes place Kura River is the main waterway in Caucasus area, originates from due to the mining industry, agriculture and livestock activities starting eastern Turkey, with the total length of 1515 km and inflow to the from the upstream basin countries.4,5 The cooperation between the Caspian Sea through Georgia and Azerbaijan.
    [Show full text]
  • Overview of the Armenian-Georgian Water Cooperation
    Bi-lateral Meeting between Armenia and Georgia on Cooperation in the Khrami-Debed River Basin OVERVIEW OF THE ARMENIAN-GEORGIAN WATER COOPERATION Vahagn Tonoyan EUWI+ Project Local Representative in Armenia Yerevan, 14 October 2019 REGIONAL/TRANSBOUNDARY PROJECTS • Water Management in the South Caucasus (USAID, 2001-2004) • Joint River Management Programme on Monitoring and Assessment of Water Quality on Transboundary Rivers (EU TACIS, 2002-2003) • Trans-boundary Cooperation for Hazard Prevention in the Kura-river Basin (Federal Environmental Agency of Germany, 2003-2006) • Science for Peace Program - South Caucasus River Monitoring (NATO/ OSCE, 2002-2008) • Development of Transboundary Cooperation for Hazard Prevention in Kura-Aras Basin countries (German Ministry of Environment, 2003- 2006) • Reducing Transboundary Degradation in the Kura-Aras Basin. UNDP/GEF. 2003-2008 • South Caucasus Water Program (USAID, 2005-2008) 2 REGIONAL/TRANSBOUNDARY PROJECTS (CONTINUED) • Water Governance Project (EU/TACIS, 2008-2010) • Trans Boundary River Management Phase II for the Kura River (EU/TACIS, 2008-2011) • Fostering Transboundary Cooperation in the Kura-Aras River Basin (UNDP/ENVSEC, 2010-2011) • Trans Boundary River Management Phase III for the Kura River (EU/TACIS, 2012-2013) • Reducing Transboundary Degradation in the Kura-Aras Basin (UNDP/GEF, 2011-2014) • Environmental Protection for International River Basins (EU, 2012- 2016) • European Union Water Initiative Plus for Eastern Partnership (EU, 2016-2020) 3 STRATEGIES FOR PROMOTING TRANSBOUNDARY
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Fisheries and Aquaculture Development Potentials in Georgia
    FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Circular No. 1055/1 REU/C1055/1(En) ISSN 2070-6065 REVIEW OF FISHERIES AND AQUACULTURE DEVELOPMENT POTENTIALS IN GEORGIA Copies of FAO publications can be requested from: Sales and Marketing Group Office of Knowledge Exchange, Research and Extension Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations E-mail: [email protected] Fax: +39 06 57053360 Web site: www.fao.org/icatalog/inter-e.htm FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Circular No. 1055/1 REU/C1055/1 (En) REVIEW OF FISHERIES AND AQUACULTURE DEVELOPMENT POTENTIALS IN GEORGIA by Marina Khavtasi † Senior Specialist Department of Integrated Environmental Management and Biodiversity Ministry of the Environment Protection and Natural Resources Tbilisi, Georgia Marina Makarova Head of Division Water Resources Protection Ministry of the Environment Protection and Natural Resources Tbilisi, Georgia Irina Lomashvili Senior Specialist Department of Integrated Environmental Management and Biodiversity Ministry of the Environment Protection and Natural Resources Tbilisi, Georgia Archil Phartsvania National Consultant Thomas Moth-Poulsen Fishery Officer FAO Regional Office for Europe and Central Asia Budapest, Hungary András Woynarovich FAO Consultant FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS Rome, 2010 The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned.
    [Show full text]
  • Ten-Year Development Plan for Georgian Gas Transmission Network 2018-2027
    Ten-Year Development Plan for Georgian Gas Transmission Network 2018-2027 October 2017 1 The document represents a 10-year Georgian gas transmission and related infrastructure development plan. It was prepared on the basis of 2016 and 2017 year editions of “10-Year Development Plan for Georgian Gas Transmission Infrastructure)’’, considering the actual situation of current period. The 10-year Gas Network Development Plan was discussed with the Georgian Gas Transportation Company, presented to the Ministry of Energy of Georgia, the Georgian National Energy Regulatory Commission and other stakeholders. Consultations regarding the information used in and information on the project implementation of the 10-year Gas Network Development Plan can be obtained from GOGC Strategic Planning and Projects Department. Head of the Department: Teimuraz Gochitashvili, Dr. Sci, professor, Tel: +(995 32) 2244040 (414); E-mail: [email protected] 2 Contents Abbreviations ...........................................................................................................................4 Executive summary ..................................................................................................................5 1. Introduction .....................................................................................................................7 1.1. General provisions............................................................................................................ 7 1.2. Formal and methodological basis for preparing the plan ..............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Géorgie 44° Oust-Djegouta 44°
    vers TCHERKESSK 42° vers TCHERKESSK vers BOUDENNOVSK 44° ESSENTOUKI PIATIGORSK GEORGUIEVSK GÉORGIE 44° OUST-DJEGOUTA 44° t TE RRI T O I R E D E S T A V R O P O L u PREGRADNAÏA o a Koura a m R U S S I E 40° É s u R PUBLIQUE DES k o a A lk É a Ï K k o ADYGU S b ZELENTCHOUKSKA A oumo KISLOVODSK Z a dk L o ïa P GÉORGIE a Ï Mer vers TOUAPSÉ TERRITOIRE DE KARATCHA EVSK h c oup vers KIZLIAR Mer KRASNAÏA l ur Caspienne o O POLIANA B lka PROKHLADNY Noire SOTCHI R É P U B L I Q U E D E S Ma lka Ma MOZDOK KRASNODAR a BAKSAN d r m ek e ue Ï T er u R b n heg MA SKI ARMÉNIE AZERBAÏDJAN o Avadkhara e a Tc s T aks P KARATCHA Ï S-TC HERKE SSES B NARTKALA Terek ADLER Lesselidzé MALGOBEK TEREK TURQUIE TEBERDA K U KABARDINO- Gantiadi Bzyb o u NALTCHIK b TYRNYAOUZ INGOUCHIE Gagra a M o n t s Ï n k d u DOMBA re GROZNY B z y b 5642 e KARDJINE S h Elbrous c 4046 T n IRAN ABKHAZIE ou ja GOUDERMES Lychny 2781 C BALKARIE S Pitsounda Mt Dombaï-Oulguen ELBROUS NAZRAN SYRIE IRAQ Akhalcheni vers Goudaouta Kvemo-Ajara S DIGORA ARDON Novy-Afon BESLAN Amtkeli A dori i 46° vers GROZNY Soukhoumi Ko o r 40° o d Mestia 5204 ALAGUIR VLADIKAVKAZ K S Ing h Goulripch M o n t s d u o k k V u a r u É É l A i o I TCH TCH NIE Dranda Khaichi N r É u Capitale d'État Tkvartcheli É Mt Chkhara U u O SS TIE o Mt Laïla T I E O S (plus de 1 100 000 hab.) 4008 5068 DU NORD vers MAKHATCHKALA Plus de 200 000 hab.
    [Show full text]
  • Fresh Groundwater Monitoring in Georgia, EUWI+ Project Support to Georgia in Implementing the EU Water Framework Directive and Improvment the Monitoring Network
    EGU2020-17803 https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-17803 EGU General Assembly 2020 © Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Fresh Groundwater Monitoring in Georgia, EUWI+ project support to Georgia in implementing the EU Water Framework Directive and improvment the monitoring network Nana Kitiashvili1, Merab Gaprindashvili1, Christoph Leitner2, and Franko Humer2 1Ministry of Environmental Protection and Agriculture of Georgia, LEPL National Environmental Agency 2Umweltbundesamt - Environment Agency Austria Georgia is among the countries which have fresh groundwater distinguished for significant resources and drinking qualities of naturally high quality. Hydrogeological exploration and monitoring works for the purpose of identification, study and protection of fresh groundwater were not conducted in the period of 1990–2013. Considering the long-term termination of centralized researches and the intensively increasing anthropogenic pressures on the environment and on water in particular, the assessment and protection of groundwater resources becomes a very pressing issue. For this purpose, in 2013, on initiative of the Geology Department of LEPL National Environmental Agency of Georgia and the Czech Development Agency, restoration of the hydrogeological monitoring network and research of fresh groundwater using modern methodology began. The modern equipment was gradually installed on the water objects to obtain information about quantitative and qualitative characteristics in "online" mode and taking water samples for chemical and bacterial analysis twice a year. Currently, 56 water points (mainly wells) are being monitored. The database on quantitative and qualitative characteristics of fresh groundwater of Georgia is being expanding based on information received online from water points, fieldwork results, laboratory analyzes (chemical and bacteriological), and on the processing, analyzing and generalizing of the collected actual materials.
    [Show full text]
  • Surface Water Monitoring in the Khrami-Debed River Basin District, Georgia
    European Union Water Initiative Plus for the Eastern Partnership Countries (EUWI+) Result 2 SURFACE WATER MONITORING IN THE KHRAMI-DEBED RIVER BASIN DISTRICT, GEORGIA April 2021 Beneficiaries National Environmental Agency (NEA) Responsible EU member state consortium project leader Alexander Zinke, Umweltbundesamt GmbH (AT) EUWI+ country representative in Georgia Zurab Jincharadze, Project Representative of the EU Member State Consortium in Georgia (GE) Responsible international thematic lead expert Kristina Schaufler, Umweltbundesamt GmbH (AT) Authors Georg Wolfram, DWS Hydro-Ökologie – Umweltbundesamt GmbH (AT) Kristina Schaufler, Umweltbundesamt GmbH (AT) Daniel Trauner, Umweltbundesamt GmbH (AT) Gabriele Vincze, Umweltbundesamt GmbH (AT) Daniela Csar, blattfisch e.U. – Umweltbundesamt GmbH (AT) Christian Pichler-Scheder, blattfisch e.U. – Umweltbundesamt GmbH (AT) Elisabeth Sigmund, DWS Hydro-Ökologie – Umweltbundesamt GmbH (AT) Peggy Macaigne, Umweltbundesamt GmbH (AT) Disclaimer: The EU-funded program European Union Water Initiative Plus for Eastern Partnership Countries (EUWI+) is im- plemented by the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE), the Organisation for Economic Co- operation and Development (OECD), both responsible for the implementation of Result 1, and an EU Member States Consortium comprising the Environment Agency Austria (UBA, Austria), the lead coordinator, and the In- ternational Office for Water (IOW, France), both responsible for the implementation of Results 2 and 3. The pro- gram is co-funded by Austria and France through the Austrian Development Agency and the French Artois-Picar- die Water Agency. This document was produced with the financial assistance of the European Union. The views expressed herein can in no way be taken to reflect the official opinion of the European Union or of the Governments of the Eastern Partnership Countries.
    [Show full text]
  • GEORGIA Finalisation of the Draft New Law on “Water Resources Standards Management “ and Process of Adoption Commenced
    The European Union Water Initiative Plus WATER GOVERNANCE FOR A SUSTAINABLE EXTENDED WATER MONITORING NETWORK DEVELOPMENT Renovated laboratory in Tbilissi accredited to international GEORGIA Finalisation of the draft new law on “Water Resources standards Management “ and process of adoption commenced. Introduction of EU Water framework Directive compliant The EU-funded programme European Union Water Initiative Plus (EUWI+) has supported Georgia in its water policy reform journey Assistance in facilitation of the reform of water abstraction coastal and transitional waters monitoring on the Black Sea since 2016. Georgia has good water resources fed by mountain rivers and is regarded as a water-abundant country (12 000 m3/ charges coast capita). However, demand on water resources from the irrigation and energy sector is growing, and unsustainable water management Successful Strategic Environmental Assessment for Alazani - Purchase of new high-end analytical equipment for sampling, practises increase this problem, in particular high water losses in the water supply network system. Pollution is also increasing due Iori river basin management plan sample preparation, field measurement, and analysis of EU to intensified agriculture and industrialisation and a growing urbanisation, a trend which is not yet counter balanced by sufficient Water framework Directive priority substances, physico- Support to development of a strategic framework for water wastewater treatment. Georgia signed an Association Agreement with the EU in 2014 and is committed
    [Show full text]
  • The First Archaeometric Characterization of Obsidian Artifacts from the Archaeological Site of Samshvilde (South Georgia, Caucasus)
    Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences https://doi.org/10.1007/s12520-019-00936-y ORIGINAL PAPER The first archaeometric characterization of obsidian artifacts from the archaeological site of Samshvilde (South Georgia, Caucasus) M. F. La Russa1,2 & L. Randazzo1 & M. Ricca1 & N. Rovella1 & D. Barca1 & S.A. Ruffolo1 & D Berikashvili3 & L. Kvakhadze4 Received: 12 July 2019 /Accepted: 3 September 2019 # Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019 Abstract This paper presents the first results about the provenance of obsidian fragments recovered in the archaeological site of Samshvilde (South Georgia, Caucasus) with the aim to obtain knowledge related to the network distribution and procurement of obsidian in Georgia. The geochemical characterization of thirty archaeological finds was obtained by the LA-ICP-MS method, an almost non-destructive technique capable of chemically characterizing the volcanic glass. A comparison of geochemical results obtained on both archaeological artefacts and geological samples collected from Chikiani outcrop in Georgia, together with literature data of southern Caucasus and eastern Turkey, allowed us to define the source of the archaeological obsidians of Samshvilde site. The majority of archaeological samples (28/30) shows a local provenance, precisely from Chikiani (Georgia) on the contrary the other two samples suggest a provenance from two different Armenian sources respectively Gegham and Akhurian volcanic system. Keywords Obsidian . Trace elements . LA-ICP-MS . Samshvilde . Georgia Introduction and archaeological background structures were located, by a 12 m high and 7 m wide fortifi- cation wall, forming a citadel. Such heavily fortified well- Samshvilde is an archaeological complex situated in Kvemo preserved defensive systems are characterized only for most Kartli province, in the southern-central part of Georgia.
    [Show full text]
  • The Caucasus
    Cooperation in the European Mountains 2: The Caucasus European Programme Established in 1987, the European Programme seeks to identify and analyse the economic and social forces impacting on biodiversity conservation, and apply the power of the constituency to address them. The Programme is active in species and ecosystem-based conservation within the agriculture, forestry, and fisheries sectors and supports regional and global policy analysis and recommendations. IUCN is present in 47 of the 55 countries of the Pan-European region. IUCN's European constituency, 325 governmental and non-governmental members, six expert Commissions, and the Secretariat, provides a broad-based democratic forum for exchanging views, and taking joint action. Over 3,000 experts, organised into six networks (on ecosystem management; education and com- munication; environmental law; environment, economy and society; species survival; and protected areas/Parks for Life), provide scientific weight to the policy formulated and disseminated by the European Programme in seeking to influence societies. Since 1997, the European Programme has been co-ordinated from the IUCN European Regional Office-ERO, (based in Tilburg, The Netherlands). There is also a Central European Office (in Warsaw, Poland), a Russian Federation and CIS Office (in Moscow, Russian Federation), and a joint IUCN-REC unit (in Szentendre, Hungary). European Regional Office Cooperation in the European Mountains 2: The Caucasus Edited by Martin F. Price Environmental Research Series 13 IUCN – The World Conservation Union 2000 The designation of geographical entities in this book, and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IUCN or the Government of the Netherlands concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Implications for Kinematic Evolution of the Georgian Part of Kura Foreland Fold-And-Thrust Belt
    Structure of the Gare Kakheti foothills using seismic reflection profiles: implications for kinematic evolution of the Georgian part of Kura foreland fold-and-thrust belt Alexander Razmadze Tbilisi State University, Institute of Geophysics, Georgia ([email protected]) Gare Kakheti foothills is located between Lesser Caucasus and Kakheti Ridge and is mainly represented by the series of NEN dipping thrust faults, most of which are associated with fault‐related folds. Gare Kakheti foothills as a part of the Kura foreland fold-and-thrust belt developed formerly as a foreland basin (Oligocene-Lower Miocene) (e.g. Alania et al., 2017). Figure 1. Tectonic map of the Arabia - Eurasia collision zone Figure 2. Simplified tectonic map of the Caucasus (Modified from Adamia et al. 2011; Mosar et al. Figure 3. Geological map of study area (modified from Sepashvili, 1976). (modified from Sosson et al. 2016). Abbreviations: CR-Crimea; GC- 2010; Sosson et al. 2016). Abbreviations: SSGC- Southern Slope of Greater Caucasus, MRGC-Main Figure 5. Interpreted seismic profiles. Location is shown in Figure 3. Greater Caucasus; LC-Lesser Caucasus; R-Rioni; IUZ-Imereti uplift Range of Greater Caucasus, NSGC-Northern Slope of Greater Caucasus; RFB-Rioni foreland basin; zone; Dz-Dzirula; KFB-Kura Foreland Basin; ATFTB-Achara- IUZ-Imereti uplift zone; ATFTB-Achara-Trialeti fold-and-thrust belt; TFTB-Talysh fold-and- Trialeti fold-and-thrust belt; SAB-South Armenian Block; MB-Mus thrust belt; DZ-Dzirula; Kh-Khrami; L-Loki; Ts-Tsakhkuniats. Basin; EP-Eastern Pontides; KM-Kirsehir Massif; EAF-Eastern Anatolian Fault; NAF-North Anatolian Fault; IAES-Izmir-Ankara- Erzincan Suture; MM-Menderes Massif.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ecological Problems of Rivers of Georgia (The&Nbsp
    annals of agrarian science xxx (2016) 1e6 Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect journal homepage: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/annals-of- agrarian-science The ecological problems of rivers of Georgia (the Caspian Sea basin) Zurab Lomsadze*, Ketevan Makharadze, Rusudan Pirtskhalava The Technical University of Georgia, The Center for Studying Productive Forces and Natural Resources of Georgia, 69, M. Kostava str., Tbilisi, 0175, Georgia article info abstract Article history: The increasing demands of fresh water in the world threaten the biodiversity and the Received 29 April 2016 supply of water for food production and other vital human needs. Providing adequate Accepted 7 July 2016 quantities of pure, fresh water for humans and their diverse activities is the major problem Available online xxx worldwide. In spite of the fact that Georgia is considered rather rich of fresh water re- sources our research showed that the major rivers of The Caspian Sea basin are polluted Keywords: with different contaminants like, nitrates, ammonium nitrogen. Heavy metals, oil prod- Water pollution ucts, pesticides and other toxic chemicals. From researched rivers the most polluted are Contaminants Mashavera and Kazretula (Bolnisi Municipality). They are mainly contaminated with toxic River basin releases of joint-stock company, Madneuli's activities. The rivers are also polluted from Toxic chemicals other plants, agricultural activities and farms. To protect the public and the environment Pesticides from toxic releases the government should prevent pollution by requiring industries to Suspended particles reduce their use of toxic chemicals and restore and strengthen protection for all water Mineralization objects. Concerted actions are needed to safely manage the use of toxic chemicals and develop monitoring and regulatory guidelines.
    [Show full text]