DOCSLIB.ORG

Red, Black, and White Hearts:'Heart','Liver', and 'Lungs' In

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Red, Black, and White Hearts:'Heart','Liver', and 'Lungs' In Linguistic Typology 2021; aop Matthias Urban* Red, black, and white hearts: ‘heart’, ‘liver’, and ‘lungs’ in typological and areal perspective https://doi.org/10.1515/lingty-2021-2081 Published online July 15, 2021 Abstract: On the basis of a sample of 424 languages or dialects, this article provides a typological-comparative investigation of designations for three major internal organs of the torso, the ‘heart’,the‘liver’,andthe‘lungs’. While colexification patterns are relatively unconstrained, the data show a skewing in morphologically complex terms: ‘heart’ and ‘liver’ often serve as head nouns in complex terms for ‘lungs’, but the reverse is rare. Another recurrent phenomenon is that two of the organs –sometimes ‘heart’ and ‘lungs’, but more frequently ‘liver’ and ‘lungs’– share their head noun, and are distinguished from one another by modifiers that refer to their most salient characteristics, as in Azerbaijani aɣ ǯiyær ‘white ǯiyær’ = ‘lungs’ and gara-ǯiyær ‘black-ǯiyær’ = ‘liver’. Having thus set the typological stage, I move on to discuss two different regions of the world in which such terms for ‘lungs’ and ‘liver’ have spread through language contact. This has happened in Eurasia, where the abovementioned pattern, which I call “explicitly dyadic”, was brought from Turkish to vernaculars of the Balkans and, most likely through Azerbaijani influ- ence, to languages of the Southern Caucasus. Similar explicitly dyadic terms, but based on a head noun meaning ‘heart’, also occur in the Andes, where they appear to have spread from Quechuan to Barbacoan languages. The evidence not only shows that ‘liver’ and ‘lungs’ form a “semantic dyad” in which designations make use of “opposed characteristics” in different regions of the world, but also that such des- ignations are salient and therefore prone to spread in language contact situations. I thank Bernard Comrie, Michael Daniel, Dmitry Ganenkov, Antoine Guillaume, Zaira Khalilova and Ilknur Yavuz for discussing aspects of the data with me, and the editors of this special issue and members of the Linguistic Typology editorial board for their thorough comments on earlier instantiations of this article. The responsibility for errors of fact or interpretation, as always, is mine, not theirs. Financial support from the German Research Foundation (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, DFG – Project Number UR 310/1-1) is gratefully acknowledged. *Corresponding author: Matthias Urban [maˈthiːɐs ˈʊʁbaːn], Center for Advanced Studies ‘Words, Bones, Genes, Tools’, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany, E-mail: matthias.urban@uni- tuebingen.de Open Access. © 2021 Matthias Urban, published by De Gruyter. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. 2 M. Urban Keywords: Andes; areal typology; Balkans; calquing; Caucasus; heart; language contact; lexical typology; liver; lungs 1 Introduction The semantic and morphological structure of lexical items is among the many aspects of language that can be affected by language contact. This is nothing new and has been known to linguists for quite some time (e.g. Betz 1949; Weinreich 1953). Yet, as contributions to the present special issue and others such as Enfield (2003) show, it is only recently that areal-typological patterns in the lexicon and their genesis through language contact are being studied on a larger scale. Thus, it appears that we are now truly on our way towards an areal semantics (Matisoff 2004), with systematically studied data from a given region or even the world at large. Accordingly, it is not surprising that methods akin to those of sample-based linguistic typology are used to describe and evaluate relevant data (Gast and Koptjevskaja-Tamm 2019). Research in areal patterns in semantic and morpho- logical structure of lexical items is thus a sibling of the equally burgeoning field of lexical typology (see e.g. Koch 2001; Viberg 1984, and contributions in Juvonen and Koptjevskaja-Tamm 2016; Koptjevskaja-Tamm and Vanhove 2012; Vanhove 2008). In this article, which deals with designations for three major internal organs –‘heart’, ‘lungs’, and ‘liver’– in a typological and language contact perspective, I touch upon both interlocking fields of research. I begin in Section 2 with a discussion of colexification patterns in terms for ‘heart’, ‘liver’, and ‘lungs’.1 This section draws upon a systematic language sample for the world-wide assessment of the frequency and distribution of the possible configurations in which designations of the organs may be associated lexically. A major finding of research in lexical typology is that the same semantic associations between concepts tend to show up in various formal guises: they may be realized by colexification in one language and by morphologically complex terms in another. And, given the close association between synchronic polysemy and diachronic semantic change, they may be visible diachronically as lexical items change their meaning (see Urban 2011, 2012).2 As morphologically complex 1 I use the term colexification in a manner that appears to be becoming more and more standard in lexical typology, namely as a deliberately ambiguous cover term for polysemy and vagueness in broad studies where this relevant distinction cannot be readily made. The term is originally due to François (2008). 2 The term “semantic shift”, with the specific meaning with which it is used in the Russian tradition of lexical typology where it covers all three realizations (e.g. Zalizniak et al. 2012), also seeks to capture this insight. ‘Heart’, ‘liver’, and ‘lungs’ in typological and areal perspective 3 terms also play an important role in realizing the lexico-semantic associations among ‘heart’, ‘liver’, and ‘lungs’, this part of the lexicon fits squarely into this multidimensional web of associations. In Section 2, I will also work out more systematically a special dyadic relation between ‘liver’ and ‘lungs’ that opposes these organs along three major semantic axes. Then, in Section 3, I zoom in on one salient pattern in the sample which is found in Eurasian languages: some languages, principally of the Balkans, Turkey, and the Caucasus, feature terms for ‘lungs’ and ‘liver’ which are based on the same root, but which are distinguished by modifiers meaning ‘white’ for the ‘lungs’ and ‘black’ for the ‘liver’ respectively. This pattern appears to have spread in Eurasia to the Balkans and the Caucasus through Turkish and Azerbaijani influence. With this background, I discuss a likely case of structural borrowing from Quechuan to languages of the Barbacoan family in Section 4. In this case, the same opposition in color is involved, but the head noun as a simplex denotes the ‘heart’. Together, the evidence shows that such naming strategies are salient enough not only to recur in completely unrelated regions of the world, but also to spread through language contact in Eurasia, and likely also in South America. Section 5 provides a summary and general discussion. 2 ‘Heart’, ‘liver’,and‘lungs’ in typological perspective I will begin with a broad, sample-based assessment of the lexico-semantic asso- ciations between terms for ‘heart’, ‘liver’, and ‘lungs’. Data come from my own database of lexico-semantic associations (Urban 2012, 147 languages, 132 of which have complete datasets) and the Intercontinental Dictionary Series (IDS, Key and Comrie 2015,3 300 datasets, of which 278 are complete). This gives 447 datasets, 410 of which are complete. Because of overlaps between the databases, this amounts to data for 424 distinct languages or dialects. All data can be found in the supplementary materials. Both datasets are global in coverage, though the IDS data, reflecting the interests of its editors, are biased towards the Caucasus and South America. Data from North America come almost exclusively from the Pacific Coast; Africa is represented by only three languages, and Australian and Papuan languages are not covered at all. The sample of Urban (2012) is more balanced areally, but also not free entirely of biases. In sum, the sample used here is a mere convenience sample. 3 As archived at https://zenodo.org/record/4280608#.YMiWFkxCSUk. 4 M. Urban Table : Colexification patterns for ‘heart’, ‘lungs’, and ‘liver’. Languages exhibiting colexification may have alternative terms for specific organs. Cahuilla Polci Buin (South Kwoma Chukchi (Uto-Aztecan, (Afro- Bougainville, Papua (Sepik, Papua (Chukotko- California, Asiatic, New Guinea, New Guinea, Kamtchatkan, cahu, Nigeria, buin, Laycock kwom, Russia, Seiler and polc, in Urban ) Bowden chuk, Hioki in Cosper in Fortescue Urban ) ) Urban ) in Urban ) ‘lungs’ yávayna vaktarak muruge wopu, hiiriibu rətralɣən ‘liver’ yávayna mbatl turupa wopu pontə ‘heart’ súnil͂ mbatl muruge wopu, mesek linliŋ No. of lan- a b Remainder guages of this type in the sample aLitteral (nd.) glosses Anggor (ango) hutɨrɨ as ‘lungs or liver?’. If this were counted as a case of colexification the count would rise to . bIn Yay (bouy), tuaŋ is a term for “inner organs (the heart and lungs, sometimes including the liver)” (Gedney ). I have counted this term as colexifying ‘heart’ and ‘lungs’ only. Yir Yoront ngerr-lolt ‘lungs’, which is “given fairly consistently also for ‘heart’” (Alpher : ), was also counted. Many, in fact most, of the sample languages have distinct forms for the three organs. Other languages, however, group the organs together lexically (or “colexify” them) in different manners. As it happens, all five logically possible ways by which this may be done are attested. The patterns can be represented in a kind of Hjelmslevian semantic mini-map (Haspelmath 2003: 237; Hjelmslev [1943] 1969: 54), as in Table 1. Sampled languages in which all three meanings can be covered by a single lexical item are Kwoma and Khoekhoe (nama1264). In both, the relevant items appear to be autohyponymous (Becker 2002): they denote one organ –the ‘liver’ in Kwoma and the ‘stomach’ in Khoekhoe– specifically and the inner vital organs broadly. In both languages, there are additional terms that denote the individual organs narrowly. In their broad reading, relevant terms seem akin to English innards or offal.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Forms and Functions of Negation in Huaraz Quechua (Ancash, Peru): Analyzing the Interplay of Common Knowledge and Sociocultural Settings
    Forms and Functions of Negation in Huaraz Quechua (Ancash, Peru): Analyzing the Interplay of Common Knowledge and Sociocultural Settings Dissertation zur Erlangung des Grades eines Doktors der Philosophie am Fachbereich Geschichts- und Kulturwissenschaften der Freien Universität Berlin vorgelegt von Cristina Villari aus Verona (Italien) Berlin 2017 1. Gutachter: Prof. Dr. Michael Dürr 2. Gutachterin: Prof. Dr. Ingrid Kummels Tag der Disputation: 18.07.2017 To Ani and Leonel III Acknowledgements I wish to thank my teachers, colleagues and friends who have provided guidance, comments and encouragement through this process. I gratefully acknowledge the support received for this project from the Stiftung Lateinamerikanische Literatur. Many thanks go to my first supervisor Prof. Michael Dürr for his constructive comments and suggestions at every stage of this work. Many of his questions led to findings presented here. I am indebted to him for his precious counsel and detailed review of my drafts. Many thanks also go to my second supervisor Prof. Ingrid Kummels. She introduced me to the world of cultural anthropology during the doctoral colloquium at the Latin American Institute at the Free University of Berlin. The feedback she and my colleagues provided was instrumental in composing the sociolinguistic part of this work. I owe enormous gratitude to Leonel Menacho López and Anita Julca de Menacho. In fact, this project would not have been possible without their invaluable advice. During these years of research they have been more than consultants; Quechua teachers, comrades, guides and friends. With Leonel I have discussed most of the examples presented in this dissertation. It is only thanks to his contributions that I was able to explain nuances of meanings and the cultural background of the different expressions presented.
    [Show full text]
  • The Imposition of Translated Equivalents to Avoid T
    International Humanities Studies Vol. 3 No.1; March 2016 ISSN 2311-7796 On some future tense participles in modern Turkic languages Aynel Enver Meshadiyeva Abstract This paper investigates phonetic and morphological-semantic features and the main functions of the future participle –ası/-esi in modern Turkic languages. At the present time, a series of questions concerning an etymology of the future participle –ası/-esi in the modern Turkic languages does not have a due and exhaustive treatment in the Turkology. In the course of the research, similar and distinctive features of the future participles –ası/-esi in Turkic languages were revealed. It should be noted that comparative-historical researches of the grammatical elements in the modern Turkic languages have gained a considerable scientific meaning and undoubted actuality. The actuality of the paper’s theme is conditioned by these factors. Keywords: Future tense participle –ası/-esi, comparative-historical analysis, etimology, oghuz group, kipchak group, Turkic languages, similar and distinctive features. Introduction This article is devoted to comparative historical analysis of the future tense participle –ası/- esi in modern Turkic languages. The purpose of this article is to study a comparative historical analysis of the future tense participle –ası/-esi in Turkic languages. It also aims to identify various characteristic phonetic, morphological, and syntactic features in modern Turkic languages. This article also analyses materials of different dialects of Turkic languages, and their old written monuments. The results of the detailed etymological analysis of the future tense participle –ası/-esi help to reveal the peculiarities of lexical-semantic and morphological structure of the Turkic languages’ participle.
    [Show full text]
  • History of the Turkish People
    June IJPSS Volume 2, Issue 6 ISSN: 2249-5894 2012 _________________________________________________________ History of the Turkish people Vahid Rashidvash* __________________________________________________________ Abstract The Turkish people also known as "Turks" (Türkler) are defined mainly as being speakers of Turkish as a first language. In the Republic of Turkey, an early history text provided the definition of being a Turk as "any individual within the Republic of Turkey, whatever his faith who speaks Turkish, grows up with Turkish culture and adopts the Turkish ideal is a Turk." Today the word is primarily used for the inhabitants of Turkey, but may also refer to the members of sizeable Turkish-speaking populations of the former lands of the Ottoman Empire and large Turkish communities which been established in Europe (particularly in Germany, France, and the Netherlands), as well as North America, and Australia. Key words: Turkish people. History. Culture. Language. Genetic. Racial characteristics of Turkish people. * Department of Iranian Studies, Yerevan State University, Yerevan, Republic of Armeni. A Monthly Double-Blind Peer Reviewed Refereed Open Access International e-Journal - Included in the International Serial Directories Indexed & Listed at: Ulrich's Periodicals Directory ©, U.S.A., Open J-Gage, India as well as in Cabell’s Directories of Publishing Opportunities, U.S.A. International Journal of Physical and Social Sciences http://www.ijmra.us 118 June IJPSS Volume 2, Issue 6 ISSN: 2249-5894 2012 _________________________________________________________ 1. Introduction The Turks (Turkish people), whose name was first used in history in the 6th century by the Chinese, are a society whose language belongs to the Turkic language family (which in turn some classify as a subbranch of Altaic linguistic family.
    [Show full text]
  • Languages of the Middle Andes in Areal-Typological Perspective: Emphasis on Quechuan and Aymaran
    Languages of the Middle Andes in areal-typological perspective: Emphasis on Quechuan and Aymaran Willem F.H. Adelaar 1. Introduction1 Among the indigenous languages of the Andean region of Ecuador, Peru, Bolivia, northern Chile and northern Argentina, Quechuan and Aymaran have traditionally occupied a dominant position. Both Quechuan and Aymaran are language families of several million speakers each. Quechuan consists of a conglomerate of geo- graphically defined varieties, traditionally referred to as Quechua “dialects”, not- withstanding the fact that mutual intelligibility is often lacking. Present-day Ayma- ran consists of two distinct languages that are not normally referred to as “dialects”. The absence of a demonstrable genetic relationship between the Quechuan and Aymaran language families, accompanied by a lack of recognizable external gen- etic connections, suggests a long period of independent development, which may hark back to a period of incipient subsistence agriculture roughly dated between 8000 and 5000 BP (Torero 2002: 123–124), long before the Andean civilization at- tained its highest stages of complexity. Quechuan and Aymaran feature a great amount of detailed structural, phono- logical and lexical similarities and thus exemplify one of the most intriguing and intense cases of language contact to be found in the entire world. Often treated as a product of long-term convergence, the similarities between the Quechuan and Ay- maran families can best be understood as the result of an intense period of social and cultural intertwinement, which must have pre-dated the stage of the proto-lan- guages and was in turn followed by a protracted process of incidental and locally confined diffusion.
    [Show full text]
  • (REELA) 5-7 September 2015, Leiden University Centre for Linguistics
    Fourth Conference of the Red Europea para el Estudio de las Lenguas Andinas (REELA) 5-7 September 2015, Leiden University Centre for Linguistics Fourth Conference of the European Association for the Study of Andean Languages - Abstracts Saturday 5 September Lengua X, an Andean puzzle Matthias Pache Leiden University In the southern central Andes, different researchers have come across series of numerals which are difficult to attribute to one of the language groups known to be or have been spoken in this area: Quechuan, Aymaran, Uru-Chipayan, or Puquina (cf. Ibarra Grasso 1982: 97-107). In a specific chapter headed “La lengua X”, Ibarra Grasso (1982) discusses different series of numerals which he attributes to this language. Although subsumed under one heading, Lengua X, the numerals in question may vary across the sources, both with respect to form and meaning. An exemplary paradigm of Lengua X numerals recorded during own fieldwork is as follows: 1 mayti 2 payti 3 kimsti 4 taksi 5 takiri 6 iriti 7 wanaku 8 atʃ͡atʃ͡i 9 tʃ͡ipana 10 tʃ͡ˀutx Whereas some of these numerals resemble their Aymara counterparts (mayti ‘one’, payti ‘two’, cf. Aymara maya ‘one’, paya ‘two’), others seem to have parallels in Uru or Puquina numerals (taksi ‘four’, cf. Irohito Uru táxˀs núko ‘six’ (Vellard 1967: 37), Puquina tacpa ‘five’ (Torero 2002: 454)). Among numerals above five, there are some cases of homonymy with Quechua/Aymara terms referring to specific entities, as for instance Lengua X tʃ͡ipana ‘nine’ and Quechua/Aymara tʃ͡ipana ‘fetter, bracelet’. In this talk, I will discuss two questions: (1) What is the origin of Lengua X numerals? (2) What do Lengua X numerals reveal about the linguistic past of the southern central Andes? References Ibarra Grasso, Dick.
    [Show full text]
  • Turkic Toponyms of Eurasia BUDAG BUDAGOV
    BUDAG BUDAGOV Turkic Toponyms of Eurasia BUDAG BUDAGOV Turkic Toponyms of Eurasia © “Elm” Publishing House, 1997 Sponsored by VELIYEV RUSTAM SALEH oglu T ranslated by ZAHID MAHAMMAD oglu AHMADOV Edited by FARHAD MAHAMMAD oglu MUSTAFAYEV Budagov B.A. Turkic Toponyms of Eurasia. - Baku “Elm”, 1997, -1 7 4 p. ISBN 5-8066-0757-7 The geographical toponyms preserved in the immense territories of Turkic nations are considered in this work. The author speaks about the parallels, twins of Azerbaijani toponyms distributed in Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan, Altay, the Ural, Western Si­ beria, Armenia, Iran, Turkey, the Crimea, Chinese Turkistan, etc. Be­ sides, the geographical names concerned to other Turkic language nations are elucidated in this book. 4602000000-533 В ------------------------- 655(07)-97 © “Elm” Publishing House, 1997 A NOTED SCIENTIST Budag Abdulali oglu Budagov was bom in 1928 at the village o f Chobankere, Zangibasar district (now Masis), Armenia. He graduated from the Yerevan Pedagogical School in 1947, the Azerbaijan State Pedagogical Institute (Baku) in 1951. In 1955 he was awarded his candidate and in 1967 doctor’s degree. In 1976 he was elected the corresponding-member and in 1989 full-member o f the Azerbaijan Academy o f Sciences. Budag Abdulali oglu is the author o f more than 500 scientific articles and 30 books. Researches on a number o f problems o f the geographical science such as geomorphology, toponymies, history o f geography, school geography, conservation o f nature, ecology have been carried out by academician B.A.Budagov. He makes a valuable contribution for popularization o f science.
    [Show full text]
  • Mutual Intelligibility Among the Turkic Languages
    Mutual Intelligibility Among the Turkic Languages By Robert Lindsay Abstract: The Turkic family of languages with all important related dialects was analyzed on the basis of mutual intelligibility: (1) To determine the extent to which various Turkic lects can understand each other. (2) To ascertain whether various Turkic lects are better characterized as full languages in the own in need of ISO codes from SIL or rather as dialects of another language. (3) To analyze the history of various Turkic lects in an attempt to write a proper history of the important lects. (4) To attempt to categorize the Turkic languages in terms of subfamilies, sub-sub families, etc. The results were: (1) Rough intelligibility figures for various Turkic lects, related lects and Turkish itself were determined. Surprisingly, it was not difficult to arrive at these rough estimates. (2) The Turkic family was expanded from Ethnologue's 41 languages to 53 languages. Splitting: a number of new languages were created from existing dialects, as these dialects were better characterized as full languages than as dialects of another tongue. Lumping: a few existing languages were eliminated and re-analyzed as dialects of another or newly created language. (3) Full and detailed histories for many Turkic lects were written up in a coherent, easy to understand way, a task sorely needed in Turkic as histories of Turkic lects are often confused, inaccurate, controversial, and incomplete. (4) A new attempt was made at categorizing the Turkic family that rejects and rewrites some of the better-known characterizations. Acknowledgments: This paper could not be written without the generous support and kind, wise heart of Professor Suer Eker of Bashkent University in Ankara, who is in charge of the book project where this article is published.
    [Show full text]
  • On the External Relations of Purepecha: an Investigation Into Classification, Contact and Patterns of Word Formation Kate Bellamy
    On the external relations of Purepecha: An investigation into classification, contact and patterns of word formation Kate Bellamy To cite this version: Kate Bellamy. On the external relations of Purepecha: An investigation into classification, contact and patterns of word formation. Linguistics. Leiden University, 2018. English. tel-03280941 HAL Id: tel-03280941 https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-03280941 Submitted on 7 Jul 2021 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Cover Page The handle http://hdl.handle.net/1887/61624 holds various files of this Leiden University dissertation. Author: Bellamy, K.R. Title: On the external relations of Purepecha : an investigation into classification, contact and patterns of word formation Issue Date: 2018-04-26 On the external relations of Purepecha An investigation into classification, contact and patterns of word formation Published by LOT Telephone: +31 30 253 6111 Trans 10 3512 JK Utrecht Email: [email protected] The Netherlands http://www.lotschool.nl Cover illustration: Kate Bellamy. ISBN: 978-94-6093-282-3 NUR 616 Copyright © 2018: Kate Bellamy. All rights reserved. On the external relations of Purepecha An investigation into classification, contact and patterns of word formation PROEFSCHRIFT te verkrijging van de graad van Doctor aan de Universiteit Leiden, op gezag van de Rector Magnificus prof.
    [Show full text]
  • The Attributive Suffix in Pastaza Kichwa
    Brigham Young University BYU ScholarsArchive Theses and Dissertations 2020-06-08 The attributive suffix in Pastaza Kichwa Barrett Wilson Hamp Brigham Young University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd Part of the Arts and Humanities Commons BYU ScholarsArchive Citation Hamp, Barrett Wilson, "The attributive suffix in Pastaza Kichwa" (2020). Theses and Dissertations. 8443. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd/8443 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. The Attributive Suffix in Pastaza Kichwa Barrett Wilson Hamp A thesis submitted to the faculty of Brigham Young University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Janis Nuckolls, Chair Chris Rogers Jeff Parker Department of Linguistics Brigham Young University Copyright © 2020 Barrett Wilson Hamp All Rights Reserved ABSTRACT The Attributive Suffix in Pastaza Kichwa Barrett Wilson Hamp Department of Linguistics, BYU Master of Arts This thesis is a corpus-based description of the attributive suffix -k in Pastaza Kichwa, a Quechuan language spoken in lowland Amazonian Ecuador. The goal of this work is, first, to describe the behaviors, characteristics, and functions of the suffix using data from the Corpus of Pastaza Kichwa (Rice 2018a), and second, to offer a typological analysis of these behaviors in order to identify the most appropriate classification for the suffix. The suffix has previously been described as a nominalizer (Nuckolls & Swanson, forthcoming), and the equivalent suffix in other Quechuan varieties has been described as an agentive nominal relativizer (Weber 1983; Weber 1989; Cole 1985; Lefebvre & Muysken 1988) or a participle (Markham 1864; Weber 1989; Guardia Mayorga 1973; Catta Quelen 1985; Debenbach-Salazar Saenz 1993, Muysken 1994).
    [Show full text]
  • L.K. Meirambekova1 , G.R. Dautova2* the HISTORICAL ROLE of KAZAKH LANGUAGE in the SYSTEM of TURKIC LANGUAGES
    ISSN 1563-0323, eISSN 2618-0782 Филология сериясы. №1 (181).2021 https://philart.kaznu.kz IRSTI 16.21.25 https://doi.org/10.26577/EJPh.2021.v181.i1.ph13 L.K. Meirambekova1 , G.R. Dautova2* 1 L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University, Kazakhstan, Nur-Sultan 2Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Kazakhstan, Almaty *e-mail: *[email protected] THE HISTORICAL ROLE OF KAZAKH LANGUAGE IN THE SYSTEM OF TURKIC LANGUAGES The article touches upon the historical role of Kazakh language in the system of Turkic languages, as the former passed on its own way to the formation of different subethnical processes which lasted for several centuries. It comes as no surprise that it is necessary to know well the nature of the given ethnos itself to study any ethnic language. The knowledge of only internal language laws is not sufficient to recognize the original nature of any ethnic language and it goes without saying that its ultimate roots is directly related to the culture, history, religion and way of living of the ethnic groups speaking this lan- guage for centuries. Therefore, the way of study the national language through the combined research of the ethnic language, culture and cognition, and the history led to the birth of the totally new directions in the field of linguistics as anthropolinguistics, psycholinguistics and cognitive, social linguistics. The language of that time, which formed the basis of the ethnogenesis of Kazakh people who contributed to the formation of the nation were applied by the tribes and people are considered as the historical basis of modern Kazakh language.
    [Show full text]
  • A Grammar of Yauyos Quechua
    A grammar of Yauyos Quechua Aviva Shimelman language Studies in Diversity Linguistics 9 science press Studies in Diversity Linguistics Chief Editor: Martin Haspelmath Consulting Editors: Fernando Zúñiga, Peter Arkadiev, Ruth Singer, Pilar Valen zuela In this series: 1. Handschuh, Corinna. A typology of marked-S languages. 2. Rießler, Michael. Adjective attribution. 3. Klamer, Marian (ed.). The Alor-Pantar languages: History and typology. 4. Berghäll, Liisa. A grammar of Mauwake (Papua New Guinea). 5. Wilbur, Joshua. A grammar of Pite Saami. 6. Dahl, Östen. Grammaticalization in the North: Noun phrase morphosyntax in Scandinavian vernaculars. 7. Schackow, Diana. A grammar of Yakkha. 8. Liljegren, Henrik. A grammar of Palula. 9. Shimelman, Aviva. A grammar of Yauyos Quechua. 10. Rudin, Catherine & Bryan James Gordon (eds.). Advances in the study of Siouan languages and linguistics. 11. Kluge, Angela. A grammar of Papuan Malay. 12. Kieviet, Paulus. A grammar of Rapa Nui. 13. Michaud, Alexis. Tone in Yongning Na: Lexical tones and morphotonology. ISSN: 2363-5568 A grammar of Yauyos Quechua Aviva Shimelman language science press Aviva Shimelman. 2017. A grammar of Yauyos Quechua (Studies in Diversity Linguistics 9). Berlin: Language Science Press. This title can be downloaded at: http://langsci-press.org/catalog/book/83 © 2017, Aviva Shimelman Published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Licence (CC BY 4.0): http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ISBN: 978-3-946234-21-0 (Digital) 978-3-946234-22-7 (Hardcover) 978-3-946234-23-4
    [Show full text]
  • Applying Finite-State Techniques to a Native American Language: Quechua
    Institut f¨urComputerlinguistik Herbstsemester 2010 Universit¨atZ¨urich Applying Finite-State Techniques to a Native American Language: Quechua Lizentiatsarbeit der Philosphischen Fakult¨at der Universit¨atZ¨urich Referent: Prof. Dr. Martin Volk Verfasserin: Annette Rios Bachtelstrasse 32 8620 Wetzikon Matrikelnummer 03{703{634 arios@ifi.uzh.ch 2 Abstract Comprehensive finite-state morphology systems have been developed for numer- ous languages, nevertheless the American indigenous languages have received far less attention from the computational linguistic field than the standard European languages. For this thesis, I implemented a complete morphology system for the Andean language Quechua. Dealing with a non-standardized indigenous language of low social prestige and sparsely available resources imposes serious challenges on the development of computational linguistic tools. Nevertheless, I will show that finite-state techniques are perfectly suited to capture the relatively complex mor- phological structures of Quechua, once the linguistic processes determining word formation have been unravelled. Acknowledgments I'm grateful to many persons who helped me during the writing of this thesis. First of all, I'd like to thank my supervisor Prof. Dr. Martin Volk for his support and constructive critics. I would also like to express my gratitude to Dr. Simon Clematide, who provided the technical support on the xfst implementation with a considerable amount of patience. I'd like to thank native Quechua speaker Marisol Pillco Grajeda from Cusco, who kept answering my questions over and over again. I am grateful to Anne G¨ohringfor reading through the complete thesis and pointing out the remaining deficiencies. A big thank you goes to my sister Melanie Chenoweth for proof-reading the final script.
    [Show full text]