DOCSLIB.ORG

Written Comments

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Written Comments 1 2 3 4 1027 S. Lusk Street Boise, ID 83706 [email protected] 208.429.6520 www.boisebicycleproject.org ACHD, March, 2016 The Board of Directors of the Boise Bicycle Project (BBP) commends the Ada County Highway District (ACHD) for its efforts to study and solicit input on implementation of protected bike lanes on Main and Idaho Streets in downtown Boise. BBP’s mission includes the overall goal of promoting the personal, social and environmental benefits of bicycling, which we strive to achieve by providing education and access to affordable refurbished bicycles to members of the community. Since its establishment in 2007, BBP has donated or recycled thousands of bicycles and has provided countless individuals with bicycle repair and safety skills each year. BBP fully supports efforts to improve the bicycle safety and accessibility of downtown Boise for the broadest segment of the community. Among the alternatives proposed in ACHD’s solicitation, the Board of Directors of BBP recommends that the ACHD pursue the second alternative – Bike Lanes Protected by Parking on Main Street and Idaho Street. We also recommend that there be no motor vehicle parking near intersections to improve visibility and limit the risk of the motor vehicles turning into bicyclists in the protected lane. The space freed up near intersections could be used to provide bicycle parking facilities between the bike lane and the travel lane, which would help achieve the goal of reducing sidewalk congestion without compromising safety. In other communities where protected bike lanes have been implemented, this alternative – bike lanes protected by parking – has proven to provide the level of comfort necessary to allow bicycling in downtown areas by families and others who would not ride in traffic. The available evidence also suggests that this alternative is the safest alternative. Accordingly, the Board of Directors of the BBP finds this alternative to be the most consistent with our organization’s mission to promote the personal, social and environmental benefits of bicycling, and recommends bike lanes protected by parking on Main and Idaho Streets. Sincerly, Boise Bicycle Project, Board of Directors BoiseBicycleProject.org 5 Ryan Head, ACHD Project Manager 3/10/2016 Ada County Highway District 3775 Adams St. Garden City, ID 83714 RE: Idaho Conservation League comments on the Main and Idaho Bicycle Lane Alternatives Study. Dear Mr. Head: Thank you for the opportunity for public comment on the Main and Idaho Bicycle Lane Alternative Study with the objective of developing a safe and comfortable route for alternative transportation. Since 1973, the Idaho Conservation League has been Idaho’s leading voice for clean water, air, and the open spaces. We work to protect these values through public education, outreach, advocacy and policy development. As Idaho’s largest state-based conservation organization, we represent over 25,000 supporters across the state, many of which care deeply about the extraordinary quality of life Idaho and Boise offers. Now is the time to invest in a system that supports citizen well being, healthy communities, connectivity and accessibility for everyone. Boise’s unique character is highlighted with a vibrant downtown, a world-class university and access to open spaces. By creating a convenient and easy system for bikes to move through the downtown area, it will only strengthen the livability for Boise residents, provide a showcase to those that visit, and keep cyclists safe. Knowing that each of the concept proposals have benefits and trade-offs, The Idaho Conservation League is strongly in support of the buffered bike lanes protected by parking. We feel that this concept builds space for bicycles and pedestrians, is easy to understand for motor vehicles, and builds upon a level of comfort that Boise already has with existing bike lanes. We would like to see use of planters and dedicated green space for the separation of auto traffic, and the peace of mind for those traveling by bike. Please do not hesitate to contact me at (208)345-6933 ext. 16 or [email protected] if you have any questions regarding our comments. Sincerely, Lana Weber Community Engagement Associate 6 7 GtvENs PunsLEY"" Attorneys and Counselors at Law Poirick J. Miller Allen Brion J Holleron 601 W. Bonnock Slreet Gory G. Ke6ti H. Kennedy Judson B. Monlgomery PO Box272O Peter G. Borion Don E Knickrehm Deboroh E. Nelson Boise, lD 83701 Chrislopher J. Beeson Neol A. Koskello W. Hugh O'Riordon, LL.M. Telephone: 208-388-l 200 Joson l. Blokley Deboro K. Krislensen Michoel O. Roe Focsimile: 208-388-l 30O Clint R. Bolinder P Mork Thompson Erik J. Bolinder Michoel P Lowrence A. Wor M.givenspu6ley.com Jeff W. Bower Fronklin G. Lee JeFFrey Robert B. White Preslon N. Corter Dovid R. Lombordi Jeremy C. Chou Kimberly D. MoloneY M. Reed, of counsel Williom C. Cole Kenneth R. McClure Angelo Michoel C. Creomer Kelly Greene Mcconnell L. Edword Miller Amber N. Dino Alex P. McLoughlin 208-38&1 209 L. Pu6ley ( 1940-20lsl Brodley J. Dixon Melodie A. McQuode Kenneth edmiller@givenspuEleY com A. Mcclure ( 1924-2ol l) Thomos E. Dvorok Christopher H. Meyer Jomes Roymond D. Givens ( 1917-2008) Jetfrey C. Feredoy L. Edword Miller Morlin C. Hendrickson March 28.2016 Mr. Kent Goldthorpe, President Ada County Highway District Commission 3775 Adams Street Garden City, Idaho 83714 Dear President Goldthorpe and Commissioners, The purpose of this letter is to provide comment on the Main and Idaho Bicycle Lane Altematives. We have had the opportunity to review the various alternatives with the City Staff. I would like to voice support for the Parking Protected Alternative on Main and Idaho Streets. It seerns to me that this modification will be the best for creating a vibrant and healthy downtown. As a downtown property owner and co-managlng partner of a 60 plus person law firm headquartered at 6th and Bannock, I have a significant interest in the functionality and aesthetics of downtown as a regional business center. We are seeing trernendous growth and private investment in Downtown Boise. I initially had some reluctance to creating the protected bike lanes; however, I am now quite convinced this facility, properly designed, has the potential to be an iconic piece of public infrastructure that significantly enhances the "Downtown Boise Brand" as the center of cultural, civic, and commercial activity for the entire region. Given the excess lane capacity that exists we would be missing a huge opportunity by not building this landmark facility. Our support of the Parking Protected Alternative is conditional: it is vital that these changes are properly implernented with intentional design and are connected to the larger bicycle network. Our support assumes that the design and implementation would be of a permanent jersey nature and finished with appropriate materials. The use of temporary materials, such as barriers and "candles", will not inspire confidence in the infrastructure and could be a disincentive to use, investment and appearance. 8 Mr. Kent GoldthorPe, President March 28,2016 Page2 excited by the We at Give,lrs Pursley are long time occupants of downtown; we are citizens. We commend the be,nefits this project will bring to our employees,clients, and fellow project and look Disfrict for its foresight in proposing this significant and forward-looking fonvard to its construction. L. Edward Miller Daren Fluke, City of Boise City 9 March 26, 2016 Open House – Bicycle Alternatives I recently attended an open house at the Boise City Hall to review the alternatives being proposed for bicycle routing through the City of Boise. The presentations with alternative paths were outlined on maps while representatives of the city were present to answer questions. Although this was a simple way to present the topic, I was hoping that elected officials and representatives from the various agencies would be making verbal presentations and taking questions. It seems this would have been a more interactive approach to the subject and would have provided a broader perspective for all in attendance to consider. After giving this matter serious consideration, I determined that the best question to ask of the representatives would be, how many bicycles currently pass through the core of the city on either Main or Idaho Streets on a daily basis and what is the comparison between this figure and car traffic? After all, it would seem the primary reason for addressing this issue would be the presence of a major need. The answers ranged from “well I am certain they studied this but I don’t know”, to “I am certain many more cars”. Residing in Boise for over sixty years, Main and Idaho Streets have always provided the primary east- west traffic lanes through the city. I guess that is why many of the parking garage access points are located off of these two streets. Retail stores once thrived in the downtown area lining the sidewalks along these primary arteries. With the closing of Macy’s downtown (replacing it with a school) and absence of any major department store, shopping is limited to small specialty stores of which operations are often short lived. I fear this new plan of bottle necking traffic flow by eliminating lanes or parking spaces will further impede any retail growth on both Main and Idaho by discouraging access to the city. Today’s temporary two lane restriction on Main Street due to construction should give all of us a look at the effect of two lane traffic on major arteries. After all, these streets provide primary access for downtown businesses, commuters, employees, entertainment and restaurants. In a past project, ACHD installed temporary bike lanes to test the concept. It didn’t take long to note that access to the parking garages by vehicular traffic crossing over the dedicated bicycle lanes created conflicts and safety concerns.
Recommended publications
  • City of Del Mar Staff Report

    City of Del Mar Staff Report

    City of Del Mar Staff Report TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members FROM: Clem Brown, Environmental Sustainability/Special Projects Manager Via Scott Huth, City Manager DATE: May 6, 2019 SUBJECT: License Agreement with Gotcha Ride LLC to Operate the North County Bike Share Pilot Program in the City of Del Mar REQUESTED ACTION/RECOMMENDATION: Staff requests that the City Council approve a license agreement with Gotcha Ride LLC (Attachment A) to operate the North County Coastal Bike Share Pilot Program in the City of Del Mar and authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement. BACKGROUND: The City of Del Mar is committed to reducing local greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions to limit the effects of climate change, while also offering viable transportation alternatives to driving. Del Mar has adopted a Climate Action Plan (CAP) that establishes a number of strategies to meet GHG emissions reduction targets, including facilitating safe, convenient, and affordable alternative transportation options. Specifically, Goal 14 in the CAP includes a strategy to “explore implementation of a bike share program…to provide another transportation alternative for traveling in town.” Transportation, especially travel via single occupancy vehicles, is a major source of GHG emissions in Del Mar and the other north San Diego County (North County) coastal cities. Offering and promoting programs like bike share, that replace vehicle trips with bike trips, is one way Del Mar can help to reduce emissions while offering more efficient and more affordable transportation modes for residents, employees, and visitors. Bike share is a service by which bicycles are made available for shared use to individuals on a very short-term basis, allowing them to borrow a bicycle at one location and return it either to the same or an alternate location within a defined geographic boundary.
  • Lessons from the Green Lanes: Evaluating Protected Bike Lanes

    Lessons from the Green Lanes: Evaluating Protected Bike Lanes

    Lessons from the Green Lanes: Evaluating Protected Bike Lanes http://bit.ly/nitc_583 Christopher M. Monsere @CMonsere Jennifer Dill @JenniferDillPSU Nathan McNeil @NWUrban Portland State University Pro Walk Pro Bike Pro Place Pittsburgh, PA September 9, 2014 1 Photo credit: Nathan McNeil, PSU Session Overview 1. Overview of Sites (Chris) 10 2. Methodology (Nathan) 5 3. Change in Ridership (Jennifer) 15 *Questions from audience* 4. Design (Chris) 25 *Questions from audience* 6. Barrier types (Nathan) 5 7. Community Support (Jennifer) 10 *Questions from audience* 2 Research Objectives • A field-based evaluation of protected bikeways in five U.S. cities to study: – Safety of users (both perceived and actual) – Effectiveness of the design – Perceptions of residents and other road users – Attractiveness to more casual cyclists – Change in economic activity 3 Overview of Sites 4 Green Lane Cities Studied 5 Study Facilities: Austin Rio Grande Street Bluebonnet Lane Barton Springs Road 6 Study Facilities: Chicago Chicago: N/S Dearborn Street Chicago: N Milwaukee Avenue 7 Study Facilities: Portland Portland: NE Multnomah Street 8 Study Facilities: San Francisco SF: Fell Street SF: Oak Street 9 Study Facilities: Washington DC DC: L Street 10 Methodology 11 Video Data • Primarily intersections • 3 locations per facility, 2 cameras per location • 2 days of video (7am to 7pm) per location • 168 hours analyzed • 16,393 bicyclists and 19,724 turning vehicles observed Example Video Screenshots (2 views) from San Francisco at Oak and Broderick Resident
  • Olathe's Bike Share Implementation Strategy

    Olathe's Bike Share Implementation Strategy

    CITY OF OLATHE + MARC Bike Share Implementation Strategy FEBRUARY 2018 Bike Share Implementation Strategy | 1 2 | City of Olathe Acknowledgements Project Partners Advisory Committee City of Olathe John Andrade – Parks & Recreation Foundation Mid America Regional Council Tim Brady – Olathe Schools Marvin Butler – Fire Captain/Inspector Emily Carrillo – Neighborhood Planning City Staff Coordinator Mike Fields – Community Center Manager Susan Sherman – Assistant City Manager Ashley Follett – Johnson County Department of Michael Meadors – Parks & Recreation Director Health and Enviroment Brad Clay – Deputy Director Parks & Recreation Megan Foreman – Johnson County Department Shawna Davis – Management Intern of Health and Enviroment Lisa Donnelly – Park Project Planner Bubba Goeddert – Olathe Chamber of Commerce Mike Latka – Park Project Coordinator Ben Hart – Parks & Recreation Foundation Linda Voss – Sr. Traffic Engineer Katie Lange – Interpreter Specialist Matt Lee – Mid-America Nazarene University Consultant Team Laurel Lucas – Customer Service, Housing Megan Merryman – Johnson County Parks & BikeWalkKC Recreation District Alta Planning + Design Liz Newman – Sr. Horticulturist Vireo Todd Olmstead – Facility & Housing Assistant Manager Sean Pendley – Sr. Planner Kathy Rankin – Housing Services Manager Bryan Severns – K-State Olathe Jon Spence – Mid-America Nazarene University Drew Stihl – Mid-America Regional Council Brenda Volle – Program Coordinator, Housing Rob Wyrick – Olathe Health Bike Share Implementation Strategy | 3 4 | City of Olathe Table of Contents I. BACKGROUND 11 II. ANALYSIS 15 III. SYSTEM PLANNING 45 IV. IMPLEMENTATION 77 Bike Share Implementation Strategy | 5 6 | City of Olathe Executive Summary Project Goals System Options • Identify how bike share can benefit Olathe. • Bike Library: Bike libraries usually involve a fleet of bicycles that are rented out at a limited • Identify the local demand for bike share in number of staffed kiosks.
  • Pedestrian and Bicycle Friendly Policies, Practices, and Ordinances

    Pedestrian and Bicycle Friendly Policies, Practices, and Ordinances

    Pedestrian and Bicycle Friendly Policies, Practices, and Ordinances November 2011 i iv . Pedestrian and Bicycle Friendly Policies, Practices, and Ordinances November 2011 i The Delaware Valley Regional Planning The symbol in our logo is Commission is dedicated to uniting the adapted from region’s elected officials, planning the official professionals, and the public with a DVRPC seal and is designed as a common vision of making a great region stylized image of the Delaware Valley. even greater. Shaping the way we live, The outer ring symbolizes the region as a whole while the diagonal bar signifies the work, and play, DVRPC builds Delaware River. The two adjoining consensus on improving transportation, crescents represent the Commonwealth promoting smart growth, protecting the of Pennsylvania and the State of environment, and enhancing the New Jersey. economy. We serve a diverse region of DVRPC is funded by a variety of funding nine counties: Bucks, Chester, Delaware, sources including federal grants from the Montgomery, and Philadelphia in U.S. Department of Transportation’s Pennsylvania; and Burlington, Camden, Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Gloucester, and Mercer in New Jersey. and Federal Transit Administration (FTA), the Pennsylvania and New Jersey DVRPC is the federally designated departments of transportation, as well Metropolitan Planning Organization for as by DVRPC’s state and local member the Greater Philadelphia Region — governments. The authors, however, are leading the way to a better future. solely responsible for the findings and conclusions herein, which may not represent the official views or policies of the funding agencies. DVRPC fully complies with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and related statutes and regulations in all programs and activities.
  • FHWA Bikeway Selection Guide

    FHWA Bikeway Selection Guide

    BIKEWAY SELECTION GUIDE FEBRUARY 2019 1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave Blank) 2. REPORT DATE 3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED February 2019 Final Report 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5a. FUNDING NUMBERS Bikeway Selection Guide NA 6. AUTHORS 5b. CONTRACT NUMBER Schultheiss, Bill; Goodman, Dan; Blackburn, Lauren; DTFH61-16-D-00005 Wood, Adam; Reed, Dan; Elbech, Mary 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION VHB, 940 Main Campus Drive, Suite 500 REPORT NUMBER Raleigh, NC 27606 NA Toole Design Group, 8484 Georgia Avenue, Suite 800 Silver Spring, MD 20910 Mobycon - North America, Durham, NC 9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) 10. SPONSORING/MONITORING AND ADDRESS(ES) AGENCY REPORT NUMBER Tamara Redmon FHWA-SA-18-077 Project Manager, Office of Safety Federal Highway Administration 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE Washington DC 20590 11. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES 12a. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT 12b. DISTRIBUTION CODE This document is available to the public on the FHWA website at: NA https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/ped_bike 13. ABSTRACT This document is a resource to help transportation practitioners consider and make informed decisions about trade- offs relating to the selection of bikeway types. This report highlights linkages between the bikeway selection process and the transportation planning process. This guide presents these factors and considerations in a practical process- oriented way. It draws on research where available and emphasizes engineering judgment, design flexibility, documentation, and experimentation. 14. SUBJECT TERMS 15. NUMBER OF PAGES Bike, bicycle, bikeway, multimodal, networks, 52 active transportation, low stress networks 16. PRICE CODE NA 17. SECURITY 18. SECURITY 19. SECURITY 20.
  • Using Crowdsourcing to Prioritize Bicycle Network Improvements

    Using Crowdsourcing to Prioritize Bicycle Network Improvements

    GEORGIA DOT RESEARCH PROJECT 14-39 FINAL REPORT USING CROWDSOURCING TO PRIORITIZE BICYCLE NETWORK IMPROVEMENTS OFFICE OF RESEARCH 15 KENNEDY DRIVE FOREST PARK, GA 30297-2534 This page intentionally left blank. GDOT Research Project RP14-39 Final Report Using Crowdsourcing to Prioritize Bicycle Network Improvements By Dr. Kari E. Watkins Assistant Professor School of Civil and Environmental Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Chris LeDantec Assistant Professor School of Literature, Media and Communication Georgia Institute of Technology Contract with Georgia Department of Transportation In cooperation with U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration April 2016 The contents of this report reflect the views of the author(s) who is (are) responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the Georgia Department of Transportation or the Federal Highway Administration. This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation. i This page intentionally left blank. ii 1.Report No.: 2. Government Accession No.: 3. Recipient's Catalog No.: FHWA-GA-16-1439 4. Title and Subtitle: 5. Report Date: Using Crowdsourcing to Prioritize Bicycle April 2016 Network Improvements 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s): 8. Performing Organ. Report No.: Dr. Kari E. Watkins, PE (P.I.), Dr. Chris LeDantec (co-P.I), Aditi Misra, Mariam Asad, Charlene Mingus, Cary Bearn, Alex Poznanski, Anhong Guo, Rohit Ammanamanchi, Vernon Gentry, Aaron Gooze 9. Performing Organization Name and Address: 10. Work Unit No. Georgia Institute of Technology 11. Contract or Grant No.: School of Civil and Environmental Engineering GDOT Research Project No.
  • Getting to the Curb: a Guide to Building Protected Bike Lanes.”)

    Getting to the Curb: a Guide to Building Protected Bike Lanes.”)

    Getting to the Curb A Guide to Building Protected Bike Lanes That Work for Pedestrians This report is dedicated to Joanna Fraguli, a passionate pedestrian safety advocate whose work made San Francisco a better place for everyone. This report was created by the Senior & Disability Pedestrian Safety Workgroup of the San Francisco Vision Zero Coalition. Member organizations include: • Independent Living Resource Center of San Francisco • Senior & Disability Action • Walk San Francisco • Age & Disability Friendly SF • San Francisco Mayor’s Office on Disability Primary author: Natasha Opfell, Walk San Francisco Advisor/editor: Cathy DeLuca, Walk San Francisco Illustrations: EricTuvel For more information about the Workgroup, contact Walk SF at [email protected]. Thank you to the San Francisco Department of Public Health for contributing to the success of this project through three years of funding through the Safe Streets for Seniors program. A sincere thanks to everyone who attended our March 6, 2018 charette “Designing Protected Bike Lanes That Are Safe and Accessible for Pedestrians.” This guide would not exist without your invaluable participation. Finally, a special thanks to the following individuals and agencies who gave their time and resources to make our March 2018 charette such a great success: • Annette Williams, San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency • Jamie Parks, San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency • Kevin Jensen, San Francisco Public Works • Arfaraz Khambatta, San Francisco Mayor’s Office on Disability Table of
  • Road Safety Action Group Inner Melbourne Name of Project: Door Knock 2012 Project Number: 0010

    Road Safety Action Group Inner Melbourne Name of Project: Door Knock 2012 Project Number: 0010

    RSAGIM Door Knock – Background Research Contents Executive Summary .................................................................................................... iii 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Car dooring zone .......................................................................................... 1 1.2 Road rules .................................................................................................... 2 1.3 Objectives ..................................................................................................... 3 2 Crash Analysis ...................................................................................................... 4 2.1 Introduction ................................................................................................... 4 2.2 What is the prevalence of car dooring crashes? .......................................... 6 2.3 Which vehicle door presents the hazard? .................................................... 7 2.4 Where are car dooring collisions occurring? ................................................ 7 2.5 What is the injury severity? ........................................................................ 11 2.6 Who is injured? ........................................................................................... 13 2.7 How has the injury burden changed? ......................................................... 14 2.8 When are the crashes occurring? .............................................................
  • Green Lane Borough Green Lane, Montgomery County, Pennsylvania Borough Council Meeting June 10, 2021 Minutes the Borough Council

    Green Lane Borough Green Lane, Montgomery County, Pennsylvania Borough Council Meeting June 10, 2021 Minutes the Borough Council

    Green Lane Borough Green Lane, Montgomery County, Pennsylvania Borough Council Meeting June 10, 2021 Minutes The Borough Council met on the above date in the Pavilion of the Isaac Smith Park to allow for social distancing due to the COVID-19 virus pandemic. Signage was posted at the Borough Office and on the Borough’s website to advise people that the meeting was being held in the Pavilion. Borough Council waited five minutes past the 7 p.m. starting time to allow people to walk from Borough office to the Pavilion. The meeting was called to order by President Brian Carpenter at 7:05 p.m., and the Pledge of Allegiance was recited. COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: President Brian Carpenter and Vice President Gerald Godshall and Council Members Jack Findley, and Jonathan Guntz. COUNCIL MEMBERS ABSENT: Darren Landis. OTHER OFFICIALS PRESENT: Mayor Lynn Wolfe, Solicitor Dave Comer, Secretary/Treasurer Mary T. Garber, Code Enforcement/Zoning Officer John Membrino. OFFICIALS ABSENT: Engineer Joe Carlin. MOTION ON MINUTES: A motion was made by Gerald Godshall to accept the minutes of the May 13, 2021, Council meeting. Seconded by Jack Findley. Motion passed. MAYOR’S REPORT: • Mayor Wolfe reported on the Radiological Emergency Response Training & Tabletop Exercise that was held at the Marlborough Township Municipal Building on Thursday, May 20, 2021. The Mayor, Council Member Jack Findley, Borough Secretary Mary T. Garber, Fire Company Chief Ryan Crouthamel and Fire Police Captain Scott Bergey participated in the training in preparation for the Limerick Generating Station drill on November 16, 2021. • The Mayor thanked the adornment committee members, and Council Members Jack Findley and Gerald Godshall for doing such a great job keeping the park looking nice this year.
  • Scott Lagasse, Jr

    Scott Lagasse, Jr

    Messenger Building a Bicycle-Friendly Florida Vol. 19, No. 1 • Winter 2016 OFFICIAL NEWSLETTER OF THE FLORIDA BICYCLE ASSOCIATION, INC. Fast Track Scott Lagasse, Jr. “Driving” the Alert Today to... Florida Message Home By Trenda McPherson & Alert Today Florida staff cott Lagasse, Jr. or “Scotty” as many of Sus have come to know him, is the official spokesperson for Alert Today Florida. Scotty pilots the Alert Today Florida NASCAR Xfinity Series Race Car and the Alert Today Florida NASCAR Camping World Truck Series Race Truck. Yes, he “pilots” them, because this guy FLIES around the track!? While many prefer a motor vehicle as their mode of transportation, Scotty’s Membership 2 preference, second only to the driver’s seat on race day, is his bicycle. He’s been an avid cyclist for most of his life. He rides Blue Light Corner 5 primarily for the health benefits, but he also enjoys the fresh air and the fresh perspective WHEELS Wrap 8-9 he gets when he rides. “Unfortunately, motorists don’t always Ask Geo 11 share the road with bicyclists, and there are some roads I don’t feel safe riding on Gears 101 12 because of it,” Scotty stated. He feels it’s important to “humanize” bicycling by Touring Calendar 14 reminding motorists that PEOPLE are on Scott Lagasse, Jr. proudly sported the FBA and new Alert Tonight Florida logos at the November bicycles. “Every Life Counts” is one of Alert Homestead race. (photo courtesy of Team SLR) Today Florida’s campaigns and one of the messages Scotty drives home through his and bicycle safety? Why not? Scotty is a or other event, or organizing the next new racing and appearances outside the track.
  • Lessons from the Green Lanes: Evaluating Protected Bike Lanes in the U.S

    Lessons from the Green Lanes: Evaluating Protected Bike Lanes in the U.S

    NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR TRANSPORTATION AND COMMUNITIES FINAL REPORT Lessons from the Green Lanes: Evaluating Protected Bike Lanes in the U.S. NITC-RR-583 June 2014 A University Transportation Center sponsored by the U.S. Department of Transportation LESSONS FROM THE GREEN LANES: EVALUATING PROTECTED BIKE LANES IN THE U.S. FINAL REPORT NITC-RR-583 Portland State University Alta Planning Independent Consultant June 2014 Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. NITC-RR-583 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date Lessons From The Green Lanes: June 2014 Evaluating Protected Bike Lanes In The U.S. 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Chris Monsere, Jennifer Dill, Nathan McNeil, Kelly Clifton, Nick Foster, Tara Goddard, Matt Berkow, Joe Gilpin, Kim Voros, Drusilla van Hengel, Jamie Parks 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Chris Monsere Portland State University P.O. Box 751 Portland, Oregon 97207 11. Contract or Grant No. NITC-RR-583 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered National Institute for Transportation and Communities (NITC) Final Report P.O. Box 751 Portland, Oregon 97207 14. Sponsoring Agency Code 15. Supplementary Notes 16. Abstract This report presents finding from research evaluating U.S. protected bicycle lanes (cycle tracks) in terms of their use, perception, benefits, and impacts. This research examines protected bicycle lanes in five cities: Austin, TX; Chicago, IL; Portland, OR; San Francisco, CA; and Washington, D.C., using video, surveys of intercepted bicyclists and nearby residents, and count data.
  • FLOW Portfolio of Measures: the Role of Walking and Cycling in Reducing

    FLOW Portfolio of Measures: the Role of Walking and Cycling in Reducing

    THE ROLE OF WALKING AND CYCLING IN REDUCING CONGESTION A PORTFOLIO OF MEASURES A PORTFOLIO OF MEASURES FLOW DOCUMENT TITLE The Role of Walking and Cycling in Reducing Congestion: A Portfolio of Measures AUTHORS Thorsten Koska, Frederic Rudolph (Wuppertal Institut für Klima, Umwelt, Energie gGmbH); Case Studies: Benjamin Schreck, Andreas Vesper (Bundesanstalt für Straßenwesen), Tamás Halmos (Budapesti Közlekedési Központ), Tamás Mátrai (Budapesti Műszaki és Gazdaságtudományi Egyetem), Alicja Pawłowska (Municipality of Gdynia), Jacek Oskarbski (Politechnika Gdanska), Benedicte Swennen (European Cyclists’ Federation), Nora Szabo (PTV AG), Graham Cavanagh (Rupprecht Consult GmbH), Florence Lepoudre (Traject), Katie Millard (Transport Research Laboratory), Martin Wedderburn (Walk21), Miriam Müller, David Knor (Wuppertal Institut für Klima, Umwelt, Energie gGmbH) CONTACT Project coordinator: Rupprecht Consult Bernard Gyergyay: [email protected] Kristin Tovaas: [email protected] Project dissemination manager: Polis Daniela Stoycheva: [email protected] CITATION FLOW Project (2016). The Role of Walking and Cycling in Reducing Congestion: A Portfolio of Measures. Brussels. Available at http://www.h2020-flow.eu. IMAGE DISCLAIMER The images in this document are used as a form of visual citation to support and clarify statements made in the text. The authors have made great effort to provide credit for every image used. If, despite our efforts, we have not given sufficient credit to the author of any images used, please contact us directly at [email protected] LAYOUT PEAK Sourcing DATE July 2016 The sole responsibility for the content of this publication lies with the authors. It does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the European Union. Neither the INEA nor the European Commission is responsible for any use that may be made of the information contained therein.