DOCSLIB.ORG

Lessons from the Green Lanes: Evaluating Protected Bike Lanes in the U.S

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Lessons from the Green Lanes: Evaluating Protected Bike Lanes in the U.S NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR TRANSPORTATION AND COMMUNITIES FINAL REPORT Lessons from the Green Lanes: Evaluating Protected Bike Lanes in the U.S. NITC-RR-583 June 2014 A University Transportation Center sponsored by the U.S. Department of Transportation LESSONS FROM THE GREEN LANES: EVALUATING PROTECTED BIKE LANES IN THE U.S. FINAL REPORT NITC-RR-583 Portland State University Alta Planning Independent Consultant June 2014 Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. NITC-RR-583 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date Lessons From The Green Lanes: June 2014 Evaluating Protected Bike Lanes In The U.S. 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Chris Monsere, Jennifer Dill, Nathan McNeil, Kelly Clifton, Nick Foster, Tara Goddard, Matt Berkow, Joe Gilpin, Kim Voros, Drusilla van Hengel, Jamie Parks 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Chris Monsere Portland State University P.O. Box 751 Portland, Oregon 97207 11. Contract or Grant No. NITC-RR-583 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered National Institute for Transportation and Communities (NITC) Final Report P.O. Box 751 Portland, Oregon 97207 14. Sponsoring Agency Code 15. Supplementary Notes 16. Abstract This report presents finding from research evaluating U.S. protected bicycle lanes (cycle tracks) in terms of their use, perception, benefits, and impacts. This research examines protected bicycle lanes in five cities: Austin, TX; Chicago, IL; Portland, OR; San Francisco, CA; and Washington, D.C., using video, surveys of intercepted bicyclists and nearby residents, and count data. A total of 168 hours were analyzed in this report where 16,393 bicyclists and 19,724 turning and merging vehicles were observed. These data were analyzed to assess actual behavior of bicyclists and motor vehicle drivers to determine how well each user type understands the design of the facility and to identify potential conflicts between bicyclists, motor vehicles and pedestrians. City count data from before and after installation, along with counts from video observation, were used to analyze change in ridership. A resident survey (n=2,283 or 23% of those who received the survey in the mail) provided the perspective of people who live, drive, and walk near the new lanes, as well as residents who bike on the new lanes. A bicyclist intercept survey (n= 1,111; or 33% of those invited to participate) focused more on people’s experiences riding in the protected lanes. A measured increase was observed in ridership on all facilities after the installation of the protected cycling facilities, ranging from +21% to +171%. Survey data indicates that 10% of current riders switched from other modes, and 24% shifted from other bicycle routes. Over a quarter of riders indicated they are riding more in general because of the protected bike lanes. A large majority of drivers and bicyclists stated that they understood the intent of the intersection designs and were observed to use them as intended, though specific designs perform better than others on certain tasks. No collisions or near-collisions were observed over 144 hours of video review for safety at intersections, including 12,900 bicyclists. Residents and bicyclists indicated that any type of buffer shows a considerable increase in self-reported comfort levels over a striped bike lane, though designs with more physical separation had the highest scores. Buffers with vertical physical objects (those that would be considered protected lanes - e.g. with flexposts, planters, curbs, or parked cars) all resulted in considerably higher comfort levels than buffers created only with paint. Flexpost buffers got very high ratings even though they provide little actual physical protection from vehicle intrusions— cyclists perceive them as an effective means of positive separation. Support for the protected lanes among residents was generally strong with 75% saying that they would support building more protected bike lanes at other locations, and 91% of surveyed residents agreed with the statement, “I support separating bikes from cars.” This agreement was high among primary users of all modes (driving, walking, transit, and bicycling), though motorists expressed concerns about the impacts of protected lanes on congestion and parking. Most residents also agreed with the statement “I would be more likely to ride a bicycle if motor vehicles and bicycles were physically separated by a barrier,” with “Interested but Concerned” residents expressing the highest level of agreement at 85%. Nearly three times as many residents felt that the protected bike lanes had led to an increase in the desirability of living in their neighborhood, as opposed to a decrease in desirability (43% vs 14%). 17. Key Words 18. Distribution Statement No restrictions. Copies available from NITC: www.otrec.us/NITC 19. Security Classification (of this report) 20. Security Classification (of this page) 21. No. of Pages 22.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Written Comments
    Written Comments 1 2 3 4 1027 S. Lusk Street Boise, ID 83706 [email protected] 208.429.6520 www.boisebicycleproject.org ACHD, March, 2016 The Board of Directors of the Boise Bicycle Project (BBP) commends the Ada County Highway District (ACHD) for its efforts to study and solicit input on implementation of protected bike lanes on Main and Idaho Streets in downtown Boise. BBP’s mission includes the overall goal of promoting the personal, social and environmental benefits of bicycling, which we strive to achieve by providing education and access to affordable refurbished bicycles to members of the community. Since its establishment in 2007, BBP has donated or recycled thousands of bicycles and has provided countless individuals with bicycle repair and safety skills each year. BBP fully supports efforts to improve the bicycle safety and accessibility of downtown Boise for the broadest segment of the community. Among the alternatives proposed in ACHD’s solicitation, the Board of Directors of BBP recommends that the ACHD pursue the second alternative – Bike Lanes Protected by Parking on Main Street and Idaho Street. We also recommend that there be no motor vehicle parking near intersections to improve visibility and limit the risk of the motor vehicles turning into bicyclists in the protected lane. The space freed up near intersections could be used to provide bicycle parking facilities between the bike lane and the travel lane, which would help achieve the goal of reducing sidewalk congestion without compromising safety. In other communities where protected bike lanes have been implemented, this alternative – bike lanes protected by parking – has proven to provide the level of comfort necessary to allow bicycling in downtown areas by families and others who would not ride in traffic.
    [Show full text]
  • Lessons from the Green Lanes: Evaluating Protected Bike Lanes
    Lessons from the Green Lanes: Evaluating Protected Bike Lanes http://bit.ly/nitc_583 Christopher M. Monsere @CMonsere Jennifer Dill @JenniferDillPSU Nathan McNeil @NWUrban Portland State University Pro Walk Pro Bike Pro Place Pittsburgh, PA September 9, 2014 1 Photo credit: Nathan McNeil, PSU Session Overview 1. Overview of Sites (Chris) 10 2. Methodology (Nathan) 5 3. Change in Ridership (Jennifer) 15 *Questions from audience* 4. Design (Chris) 25 *Questions from audience* 6. Barrier types (Nathan) 5 7. Community Support (Jennifer) 10 *Questions from audience* 2 Research Objectives • A field-based evaluation of protected bikeways in five U.S. cities to study: – Safety of users (both perceived and actual) – Effectiveness of the design – Perceptions of residents and other road users – Attractiveness to more casual cyclists – Change in economic activity 3 Overview of Sites 4 Green Lane Cities Studied 5 Study Facilities: Austin Rio Grande Street Bluebonnet Lane Barton Springs Road 6 Study Facilities: Chicago Chicago: N/S Dearborn Street Chicago: N Milwaukee Avenue 7 Study Facilities: Portland Portland: NE Multnomah Street 8 Study Facilities: San Francisco SF: Fell Street SF: Oak Street 9 Study Facilities: Washington DC DC: L Street 10 Methodology 11 Video Data • Primarily intersections • 3 locations per facility, 2 cameras per location • 2 days of video (7am to 7pm) per location • 168 hours analyzed • 16,393 bicyclists and 19,724 turning vehicles observed Example Video Screenshots (2 views) from San Francisco at Oak and Broderick Resident
    [Show full text]
  • Civitas Measure Directory 10 Years of Civitas from Aalborg to Zagreb
    CIVITAS MEASURE DIRECTORY 10 YEARS OF CIVITAS FROM AALBORG TO ZAGREB A REFERENCE GUIDE TO SUSTAINABLE URBAN MOBILITY RESEARCH AND DEMONSTRATION MEASURES IMPLEMENTED BY EUROPEAN CITIES BETWEEN 2002 AND 2012 About CIVITAS The CIVITAS Initiative (“City-Vitality-Sustainability”, or “Cleaner and Better Transport in Cities”) was launched in 2002. Its fundamental aim is to support cities to introduce ambitious transport measures and policies towards sustainable urban mobility. The goal of CIVITAS is to achieve a significant shift in the modal split towards sustainable transport, an objective reached through encouraging both innovative technology and policy-based strategies. In the first phase of the project (2002 to 2006), 19 cities participated in four research and demonstration projects; and in CIVITAS II (2005 to 2009), 17 cities participated across a further four projects. The initiative has just reached the end of its third phase, CIVITAS Plus (2008 to 2013), in which 25 cities were working together on five collaborative projects. In 2012, the CIVITAS Plus II phase was launched, with seven European cities and one non-European city collaborating across two new projects. In total, more than 60 European cities have been co-funded by the European Commission to implement innovative measures in clean urban transport, an investment volume of well over EUR 300 million. But CIVITAS does not stop there. The so-called demonstration cities are part of the larger CIVITAS Forum network, which comprises more than 200 cities committed to implementing and integrating sustainable urban mobility measures. By signing a non-binding voluntary agreement known as the CIVITAS Declaration, cities and their citizens benefit from the accumulated know-how, experience and lessons learned of every participant.
    [Show full text]
  • Green Lane Borough Green Lane, Montgomery County, Pennsylvania Borough Council Meeting June 10, 2021 Minutes the Borough Council
    Green Lane Borough Green Lane, Montgomery County, Pennsylvania Borough Council Meeting June 10, 2021 Minutes The Borough Council met on the above date in the Pavilion of the Isaac Smith Park to allow for social distancing due to the COVID-19 virus pandemic. Signage was posted at the Borough Office and on the Borough’s website to advise people that the meeting was being held in the Pavilion. Borough Council waited five minutes past the 7 p.m. starting time to allow people to walk from Borough office to the Pavilion. The meeting was called to order by President Brian Carpenter at 7:05 p.m., and the Pledge of Allegiance was recited. COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: President Brian Carpenter and Vice President Gerald Godshall and Council Members Jack Findley, and Jonathan Guntz. COUNCIL MEMBERS ABSENT: Darren Landis. OTHER OFFICIALS PRESENT: Mayor Lynn Wolfe, Solicitor Dave Comer, Secretary/Treasurer Mary T. Garber, Code Enforcement/Zoning Officer John Membrino. OFFICIALS ABSENT: Engineer Joe Carlin. MOTION ON MINUTES: A motion was made by Gerald Godshall to accept the minutes of the May 13, 2021, Council meeting. Seconded by Jack Findley. Motion passed. MAYOR’S REPORT: • Mayor Wolfe reported on the Radiological Emergency Response Training & Tabletop Exercise that was held at the Marlborough Township Municipal Building on Thursday, May 20, 2021. The Mayor, Council Member Jack Findley, Borough Secretary Mary T. Garber, Fire Company Chief Ryan Crouthamel and Fire Police Captain Scott Bergey participated in the training in preparation for the Limerick Generating Station drill on November 16, 2021. • The Mayor thanked the adornment committee members, and Council Members Jack Findley and Gerald Godshall for doing such a great job keeping the park looking nice this year.
    [Show full text]
  • £220,000 272 Green Lane Road, Leicester, LE5
    Estate Agents Lettings Valuers Mortgages 272 Green Lane Road, Leicester, LE5 4PB • Recently Refurbished Family Home • No Upward Chain • Newly Fitted Kitchen and Bathroom • Off-Road Parking • Gas Central Heating & Double • Early Viewing Recommended A newly refurbished established home situated in this sought-after location. The well planned accommodation briefly comprises entrance hall, lounge and newly fitted kitchen/dining room, three first floor bedrooms and newly fitted bathroom. This lovely home stands with off-road parking to front, lawned gardens to rear and benefits from a full gas heating system and UPVC double glazing throughout. An internal inspection is highly recommended to appreciate the calibre of this home which is being sold with NO UPWARD CHAIN. EPC D. £220,000 GENERAL INFORMATION: FRONT LOUNGE The sought-after suburb of North Evington is 12'2 x 11'5 (3.71m x 3.48m) located to the east of the City of Leicester and With UPVC sealed unit double glazed circular is well known for its popularity in terms of bay window to front elevation, new laminate convenience for ease of access to the Leicester wood effect flooring and central heating City centre and all the excellent amenities radiator. therein, and the Ring Road which links North Evington and the adjacent suburbs of Oadby and Stoneygate to Junction 21 of the M1\M69 motorway network for travel north, south and west, and the adjoining Fosse Park and Meridian shopping, entertainment, retail and business centres. North Evington also offers access to the nearby General Hospital, as well as many of the City's major employers and a good range of local neighbourhood amenities including shopping for day-to-day needs along Green Lane Road, East Park Road, Evington Road and Uppingham Road, schooling for all ages, RE-FITTED KITCHEN\DINING ROOM recreational amenities and regular bus services 14'9 x 12'2 (4.50m x 3.71m) to the Leicester City centre.
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation Master Plan Existing and Future Conditions Technical
    Kelowna Transportation Master Plan Existing and Future Conditions Technical Report August 2019 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................. 5 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................... 11 a) Role of the Transportation Master Plan ............................................................................................ 11 b) Study Process & Timeline ................................................................................................................ 11 c) Coordination with Other Plans ........................................................................................................ 13 d) Local and Global Trends .................................................................................................................. 13 e) Policy Context ................................................................................................................................ 15 2. COMMUNITY PROFILE ............................................................................................ 20 a) Land Use and Transportation .......................................................................................................... 20 b) Demographic Trends ....................................................................................................................... 24 c) Daily Travel Patterns......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Public Report
    abc Public report Report to 21 st August 2014 Planning Committee Report of Executive Director for Place Title Petition – Request for the City Council to take action against the closure of the footpath adjacent to 7a Rowleys Green Lane 1. Purpose of the report 1.1 A petition with 27 signatures has been presented by Councillor Harvard to request that the City Council take action regarding the closure of the footpath adjacent to 7a Rowleys Green Lane. In accordance with the City Council's procedure for dealing with petitions, those relating to rights of way are heard by the Planning Committee. 2. Recommendations 2.1 The Planning Committee is recommended to: (a) agree that it can be reasonably alleged that the footpath has been dedicated as a highway on the basis of the evidence currently available; (b) subject to the approval of recommendation (a) above, to approve the use of Highways Act 1980 S143 to serve notice on the landowner to remove all obstructions and re-open the footpath; (c) approve the making of a modification order to add the footpath between Rowleys Green Lane and footpath B23 in Warwickshire to the City of Coventry (Former County Borough) Definitive Map and Statement of Public Rights of Way. 3. Background 3.1 A petition presented by Councillor Harvard has been received by the City Council containing 27 signatures requesting that:- Petition against the closure of the B23 footpath at Rowleys Green Lane, Longford, Coventry. 1 It is important to clarify that the B23 footpath is actually in Warwickshire and finishes at the City boundary.
    [Show full text]
  • Bellingham Bikeways Illustrated
    BIKEWAYS ILLUSTRATED What are “Bikeways”? Bellingham uses the term bikeways to refer to the entire spectrum of bicycle facility types installed or planned on public streets comprising the Primary Bicycle Network → in the 2014 Bicycle Master Plan. A variety of bikeway facilities and markings are illustrated on the following pages; organized from least to most expensive. Additional information is available on the Interactive Bike Map BELLINGHAM BIKEWAYS ILLUSTRATED Bellingham’s 2014 Bicycle Master Plan is based on guidance and best practices and from Excerpt from the multiple sources, including, but not limited to: NACTO Urban Bikeway Design Guide • MUTCD = Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (2nd Edition, 2014), Introduction, page xi: • AASHTO = American Association of Highway Transportation Officials “For each treatment in the Guide, the • NACTO = National Association of City Transportation Officials reader will find three levels of guidance: • WSDOT = Washington State Department of Transportation Design Manual In all cases, we encourage engineering • Local knowledge and professional expertise judgement to ensure that the regarding land use development context; application makes sense for the context multimodal transportation system; and of each treatment, given the many transportation plans and studies. complexities of urban streets.” Bike Boulevards • Comprise 39%, or 52 miles, of Bellingham’s 170-mile Primary Bicycle Network; shown in pink on Bicycle Network Map • Low-stress bikeways installed on residential streets that have low vehicle speeds (20-25 mph) and low vehicle traffic volumes (less than 2,000 vehicles per day) as a less direct, but more comfortable route for people on bikes. • Not intended to be off-limits to cars, but where necessary, physical traffic calming devices can be used to control cut- through vehicle traffic, volume, and speed to optimize Bike Boulevards for use by people on bikes.
    [Show full text]
  • Green Lane Footpath Improvement Scheme
    STOCKPORT COUNCIL EXECUTIVE REPORT – SUMMARY SHEET Subject: Green Lane Footpath Improvement Scheme Report to: (a) Heatons & Reddish Area Committee Date: Monday, 21 June 2021 Report of: (b) Corporate Director for Place Management & Regeneration Key Decision: (c) NO / YES (Please circle) Forward Plan General Exception Special Urgency (Tick box) Summary: To report the findings of a consultation exercise for the Green Lane Footpath Improvement scheme and to seek approval for the widening of the existing path to a 2.5m wide Shared Use Path, as well as the introduction of associated Traffic Regulation Orders (TROs). Recommendation(s): The Area Committee is asked to consider and approve the following proposals for the Green Lane Footpath Improvement scheme; to consider and comment upon the following proposals, and recommend that the Area Committee approves the legal advertising of the following Traffic Regulation Order and that, subject to no objections being received within 21 days from the advertisement date, the following orders can be made: No Waiting At Any Time Location Extent Green Lane Eastern side from a point 45 metres to the north of the projected northern kerbline of Kennedy Way in a northerly direction for a distance of 6 metres, then along the northern kerbline in a westerly direction for a distance of 7 metres, then along the western kerbline in a southerly direction for a distance of 6 metres (around the cul-de-sac end). Relevant Scrutiny Committee (if decision called in): (d) Communities & Housing Scrutiny Committee AGENDA ITEM
    [Show full text]
  • Circular Walks in Farnham
    Walks around Farnham Ten circular walks are included in this booklet, all starting at the Village Hall, where parking may be available. They are rated as easy, moderate or long, cover all parts of the Parish and visit all the features mentioned in this introduction. To achieve the best possible circuits, the walks also take in parts of Albury, Manuden and Stansted Mountfitchet parishes. All the paths and bridleways are in good condition, but the inevitable mud of winter can slow progress somewhat. Boots or wellies are advisable for all but the driest conditions. To help walkers find routes, waymarkers are placed at strategic points within the Parish boundaries. Most surrounding parishes are also waymarked. Yellow arrows designate footpaths, blue arrows indicate bridleways. For your assistance, alphabetical pointers (A), (B), (C), etc. are included on each map and are referenced in the text for that walk. Although Farnham has an extensive rights of way network, there is no route to beat the bounds and so walk 10 is called “The Farnham Round” and very roughly beats the Parish Boundary, visits some pubs, pays respects to neighbouring parishes and will suitably exercise the legs of the most energetic! It’s a good day out. Take your time and enjoy the Hertfordshire/Essex border countryside. Acknowledgements This publication is supported by the Parish Paths Partnership, sponsored by Essex County Council. The walks were originally devised by Dr. Nigel Wright. For this first amendment 2007, thanks go to Ian Pinder, Ian DelValle, Malcolm Willis, Barbara Jarman, Chris and Kitty Barrett and our Clerk Peter Jarman, for their contributions.
    [Show full text]
  • Green Lanes and Quiet Lanes: Priority to Pedestrians, Cyclists and Horse Riders
    STATES OF JERSEY GREEN LANES AND QUIET LANES: PRIORITY TO PEDESTRIANS, CYCLISTS AND HORSE RIDERS Lodged au Greffe on 15th June 2020 by Deputy R.J. Ward of St. Helier STATES GREFFE 2020 P.79 PROPOSITION THE STATES are asked to decide whether they are of opinion − (a) that priority should be given in law to pedestrians, cyclists and horse riders in designated Green Lanes and designated ‘quiet lanes’ in the Parishes and that vehicular traffic should only be allowed in such designated Green Lanes and such designated ‘quiet lanes’ for essential travel; (b) to request the Comité des Connétables, to designate the Green Lanes and ‘quiet lanes’ in Parishes where priority should be given, as requested in paragraph (a) above; (c) to request the Comité des Connétables, in consultation with the Minister for Infrastructure, to bring forward for approval the necessary changes to legislation to give effect to paragraphs (a) and (b) by the first quarter of 2021; (d) to request the Comité des Connétables, in consultation with the Minister for Infrastructure, to update the current road signs and markings for Green Lanes in order to show that priority is given in the use of Green Lanes to pedestrians, cyclists and horse riders; and (e) to request the Comité des Connétables to undertake a public awareness campaign in conjunction with third parties, as appropriate, regarding the use of Green Lanes and ‘quiet lanes’ and the priority given to pedestrians, cyclist and horse riders. DEPUTY R.J. WARD OF ST. HELIER Page - 2 P.79/2020 REPORT For many years the network of Green lanes in Jersey have been a feature for Islanders and tourists alike.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter Forty-Two BICYCLE FACILITIES
    Chapter Forty-two BICYCLE FACILITIES BUREAU OF LOCAL ROADS AND STREETS MANUAL BUREAU OF LOCAL ROADS & STREETS Oct 2013 BICYCLE FACILITIES 42(i) Chapter Forty-two BICYCLE FACILITIES Table of Contents Section Page 42-1 BICYCLE ACCOMMODATIONS ........................................................................... 42-1(1) 42-1.01 Definitions ............................................................................................ 42-1(1) 42-1.02 Policy ................................................................................................... 42-1(2) 42-1.03 Needs Assessment .............................................................................. 42-1(2) 42-2 CHECKLIST FOR BICYCLE ACCOMMODATIONS .............................................. 42-2(1) 42-2.01 Bicycle Travel Generators in the Project Vicinity .................................. 42-2(1) 42-2.02 Public Coordination .............................................................................. 42-2(3) 42-2.03 Assessment of Bicycle Travel............................................................... 42-2(3) 42-3 BICYCLE FACILITY DESIGN GUIDELINES.......................................................... 42-3(1) 42-3.01 Bicycle Facility Design Analysis ........................................................... 42-3(1) 42-3.01(a) Data Collection and Flow Analysis ................................... 42-3(1) 42-3.01(b) Bicycle Level of Service ................................................... 42-3(1) 42-3.01(c) Safety Analysis ...............................................................
    [Show full text]