DOCSLIB.ORG

Bronze Age Art Propaganda in Mesopotamia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Vallette 1 Bronze Age Art Propaganda in Mesopotamia Samantha E. Vallette Art 2401 J. Walsh Vallette 2 The media and elites of the twenty-first century were not the first people to use creative outlets for propaganda. Along with the creation of writing, culture, society, and art, came power. As far back as the Bronze Age cz. (3200-1200 B.C.E.), social elites have been using any means possible to manipulate and sway the general public‟s opinions. However, without television, radio, or any other form of mass media the kings of Bronze Age Mesopotamia were left with art as their only means of displaying their power and authority. Art was used to express to the public that the kings were favored and protected by the gods; they were untouchable. Additionally, kings documented their great achievements through art much as a résumé would in current day society. Some of the most important examples of propaganda used in Mesopotamia in the Bronze Age include stelai such as the Stele of the Vultures, the Victory Stele of Naram-Sin, Stele of Ur- Nammu, and Stele of Hammurabi. In general, during the Bronze Age in Mesopotamia, stelai were used to commemorate accomplishments. They were large pieces of stone which were taller than they were wide and on which was often carved a picture of the king and the events they wanted to be remembered. For example, many contain images of battles or wars won, cities captured, structures built, or association with the divinities. These were the first historical records; many included inscriptions of the details of the event and places they occurred. The purpose of the stelai were to glorify the king who had it built and to point out the wonderful things they did to reinforce their right to rule. The Stele of the Vultures was created around 2600 B.C.E. in Lagash by King Eannatum. This particular stele was built to commemorate the victory of Lagash over Umma. The lengthy inscription describes a boundary stone set up by a previous ruler of Lagash being destroyed by the people from Umma and that they began using the lands belonging to Lagash (Perkins 57) Vallette 3 (Frankfort 71). This stele was set up to reestablish the boundary line after Lagash‟s victory (Perkins 57). Although it would have been simple to just inscribe the details of his victory on the stone, King Eannatum chose to inscribe both text and image. This is most likely due to the fact that literacy rates were not high since there was no formal schooling system; therefore, those who could not read the description could view the pictures and understand the general idea of the events. Also, a large image carved into the stone is more impressive and easily understandable than having to stand in front of the stele and read the entire description. Furthermore, King Eannatum starting a war over boundaries was typical of Mesopotamian rulers in that he had a “dual preoccupation with war and water rights, as well as in his energetic construction of canals and waterworks” (Knapp 77). However, military movements such as this allowed him to have the first “political dominance” over Mesopotamia (Knapp 77). Incase any of his subjects or enemies were unaware of his army‟s accomplishments, he had this stele constructed to inform them. The images carved on the stele appear in registers, with a single scene in each. On the front, the top image is a graphic scene which involves King Eannatum leading an infantry on foot. By showing them marching over the dead bodies of their enemies, the idea that this was a complete and utter victory is solidified. Here, the artist attempts to capture the monumental size of the army by repeating body parts to show depth. However, this attempt is slightly unsuccessful since there are significantly more spears than heads, and still more heads than shields. However, the effect of depicting an enormous army is successful. Whether or not King Eannatum actually was at the front of the siege or not is irrelevant, since the message that the King‟s militia is forceful, powerful, and successful is well portrayed. The second register on the front reinforces the idea that it is the King who makes this battle victorious since he is horseback and again leading the troops into battle. Additionally, in this register, King Eannatum is larger Vallette 4 than the rest of his army, showing his importance using a hierarchy of scale. Propaganda ensues as the third register depicts King Eannatum overseeing the bodies of his dead laid neatly side-by- side. This is analogous to current propaganda where the elite is seen visiting troops oversees or helping the homeless, it is used to show sympathy and a deep caring for his people. The front of this stele shows “the exploits of warriors led by their King” while “the other side shows the decisive intervention of the gods on Eannatum‟s side” (Ruskin 145). On the back of the stele, the top two thirds are taken up by a relief showing the god Ningirsu. This image “reveals hidden forces which brought [the events] about. The god, Ningirsu, himself had taken up the just cause of his city; he caught the men of Umma in his net and destroyed them” (Frankfort 71). This proved to the viewers of the stele that Eannatum‟s cause was just, he was doing the work of the gods, and that the gods backed him up. For this stele, “the clarity of the pictorial narrative was all that mattered” (Frankfort 71). King Eannatum‟s main goal for this stele is to inform his subjects of his victorious actions and that he was willed by the gods to perform them. Another example of a king erecting a stele to commemorate a victory is in the Victory Stele of Naram-Sin. This stele is six feet high, was built in 2200 B.C.E. during the Akkadian Period and was moved to Susa, and is made of pink sandstone (Ruskin 151). Unlike the Stele of the Vultures, this stele is a single pictorial event. The scene shows the king, Naram-Sin, leading his army up a hill, his enemies cowering, pleading, and running at his feet, with the heavens above. Although, there are no strict divisions of registers, the diagonal lines of the soldiers ascending the hill draw eyes up to the king (Perkins 59). This visual aid reinforces the idea that King Naram-Sin is the focus of this piece. He also appears significantly larger than his troops, places his foot on one of his pleading enemies, and is wearing a horned crown. The horned crown was a symbol of a deity during the Bronze Age and, by wearing this hat, Naram-Sin goes Vallette 5 beyond associating himself with the gods, placing himself as an equal to them. In fact, he had adopted the titles “God of Agade” and “King of the four Quarters of the Universe” during his lifetime (Knapp 88). Since this stele is only a single image and seems to be presenting King Naram-Sin as an all powerful figure, “the action itself is less specific than symbolic” (Perkins 59). Unlike the Stele of the Vultures, the Victory Stele of Naram-Sin does not describe a specific victory, but implies that the ruler, King Naram-Sin, is someone to be feared and followed (Perkins 59). Another type of stele is for the commemoration of building a structure. The Stele of Ur- Nammu is an example of this. It was built in 2000 B.C.E. in Ur and commemorates the building of a ziggurat by King Ur-Nammu. This story seems to go from bottom to top with each register showing an artistic image of one scene rather than each register showing the progression of events. The lower registers show the actual building of the Ziggurat with ladders, bricks, and other building equipment depicted. Even King Ur-Nammu is helping; he is shown in the third register with supplies on his back following a god and being followed by a priest (Frankfort 104). Here, much like the Stele of the Vultures, the king is shown taking part in the action, right along side his people to show that he is not asking his people to do things that he himself doesn‟t participate in. This is easily another form of propaganda analogous to the modern television commercials of elites involved in events such as rebuilding after disasters or for the needy; he was not necessarily in the battle, but the fact that he is envisioned there makes his point. The top two registers show the king interacting with gods. They are symmetrical with the king appearing before the moon-god Nannar and his consort Ningal (Frankfort 103). The symmetry is neither a snapshot of an event nor a story over time, but it “destroys the narrative interest” of the piece and possibly is just for artistic purposes or alluding to two separate ceremonies but shown together Vallette 6 (Frankfort 103). Either way, the fact that King Ur-Nammu is interacting with the gods, seeking their approval of his achievements, is defining him, to his people, as a mediator with the gods. Since this is “a monument of piety, not of worldly achievement, this explains the static, hieteric, character of the composition”, King Ur-Nammu “takes care to emphasize his attentions to the gods in a way unknown to earlier times” (Frankfort 104) (Perkins 60). The Stele of Hammurabi, unlike typical steles, does not show victories or accomplishments, rather, it lays down the laws of the land.
Recommended publications
  • Art List by Year

    Art List by Year

    ART LIST BY YEAR Page Period Year Title Medium Artist Location 36 Mesopotamia Sumerian 2600 Standard of Ur Inlaid Box British Museum 36 Mesopotamia Sumerian 2600 Stele of the Vultures (Victory Stele of Eannatum) Limestone Louvre 38 Mesopotamia Sumerian 2600 Bull Headed Harp Harp British Museum 39 Mesopotamia Sumerian 2600 Banquet Scene cylinder seal Lapis Lazoli British Museum 40 Mesopotamia Akkadian 2254 Victory Stele of Narum-Sin Sandstone Louvre 42 Mesopotamia Akkadian 2100 Gudea Seated Diorite Louvre 43 Mesopotamia Akkadian 2100 Gudea Standing Calcite Louvre 44 Mesopotamia Babylonian 1780 Stele of Hammurabi Basalt Louvre 45 Mesopotamia Assyrian 1350 Statue of Queen Napir-Asu Bronze Louvre 46 Mesopotamia Assyrian 750 Lamassu (man headed winged bull 13') Limestone Louvre 48 Mesopotamia Assyrian 640 Ashurbanipal hunting lions Relief Gypsum British Museum 65 Egypt Old Kingdom 2500 Seated Scribe Limestone Louvre 75 Egypt New Kingdom 1400 Nebamun hunting fowl Fresco British Museum 75 Egypt New Kingdom 1400 Nebamun funery banquet Fresco British Museum 80 Egypt New Kingdom 1300 Last Judgement of Hunefer Papyrus Scroll British Museum 81 Egypt First Millenium 680 Taharqo as a sphinx (2') Granite British Museum 110 Ancient Greece Orientalizing 625 Corinthian Black Figure Amphora Vase British Museum 111 Ancient Greece Orientalizing 625 Lady of Auxerre (Kore from Crete) Limestone Louvre 121 Ancient Greece Archaic 540 Achilles & Ajax Vase Execias Vatican 122 Ancient Greece Archaic 510 Herakles wrestling Antaios Vase Louvre 133 Ancient Greece High
  • After the Battle Is Over: the Stele of the Vultures and the Beginning Of

    After the Battle Is Over: the Stele of the Vultures and the Beginning Of

    To raise the ofthe natureof narrative is to invite After the Battle Is Over: The Stele question reflectionon the verynature of culture. Hayden White, "The Value of Narrativity . ," 1981 of the Vultures and the Beginning of Historical Narrative in the Art Definitions of narrative, generallyfalling within the purviewof literarycriticism, are nonethelessimportant to of the Ancient Near East arthistorians. From the simpleststarting point, "for writing to be narrative,no moreand no less thana tellerand a tale are required.'1 Narrativeis, in otherwords, a solutionto " 2 the problemof "how to translateknowing into telling. In general,narrative may be said to make use ofthird-person cases and of past tenses, such that the teller of the story standssomehow outside and separatefrom the action.3But IRENE J. WINTER what is importantis thatnarrative cannot be equated with thestory alone; it is content(story) structured by the telling, University of Pennsylvania forthe organization of the story is whatturns it into narrative.4 Such a definitionwould seem to providefertile ground forart-historical inquiry; for what, after all, is a paintingor relief,if not contentordered by the telling(composition)? Yet, not all figuraiworks "tell" a story.Sometimes they "refer"to a story;and sometimesthey embody an abstract concept withoutthe necessaryaction and settingof a tale at all. For an investigationof visual representation, it seems importantto distinguishbetween instancesin which the narrativeis vested in a verbal text- the images servingas but illustrationsof the text,not necessarily"narrative" in themselves,but ratherreferences to the narrative- and instancesin whichthe narrativeis located in the represen- tations,the storyreadable throughthe images. In the specificcase of the ancientNear East, instances in whichnarrative is carriedthrough the imageryitself are rare,reflecting a situationfundamentally different from that foundsubsequently in the West, and oftenfrom that found in the furtherEast as well.
  • DESENVOLVIMENTO DO ESQUEMA DECORATIVO DAS SALAS DO TRONO DO PERÍODO NEO-ASSÍRIO (934-609 A.C.): IMAGEM TEXTO E ESPAÇO COMO VE

    DESENVOLVIMENTO DO ESQUEMA DECORATIVO DAS SALAS DO TRONO DO PERÍODO NEO-ASSÍRIO (934-609 A.C.): IMAGEM TEXTO E ESPAÇO COMO VE

    UNIVERSIDADE DE SÃO PAULO MUSEU DE ARQUEOLOGIA E ETNOLOGIA PROGRAMA DE PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO EM ARQUEOLOGIA DESENVOLVIMENTO DO ESQUEMA DECORATIVO DAS SALAS DO TRONO DO PERÍODO NEO-ASSÍRIO (934-609 a.C.): IMAGEM TEXTO E ESPAÇO COMO VEÍCULOS DA RETÓRICA REAL VOLUME I PHILIPPE RACY TAKLA Dissertação apresentada ao Programa de Pós-Graduação em Arqueologia do Museu de Arqueologia e Etnologia da Universidade de São Paulo para obtenção do título de Mestre em Arqueologia. Orientadora: Profª. Drª. ELAINE FARIAS VELOSO HIRATA Linha de Pesquisa: REPRESENTAÇÕES SIMBÓLICAS EM ARQUEOLOGIA São Paulo 2008 RESUMO Este trabalho busca a elaboração de um quadro interpretativo que possibilite analisar o desenvolvimento do esquema decorativo presente nas salas do trono dos palácios construídos pelos reis assírios durante o período que veio a ser conhecido como neo- assírio (934 – 609 a.C.). Entendemos como esquema decorativo a presença de imagens e textos inseridos em um contexto arquitetural. Temos por objetivo demonstrar que a evolução do esquema decorativo, dada sua importância como veículo da retórica real, reflete a transformação da política e da ideologia imperial, bem como das fronteiras do império, ao longo do período neo-assírio. Palavras-chave: Assíria, Palácio, Iconografia, Arqueologia, Ideologia. 2 ABSTRACT The aim of this work is the elaboration of a interpretative framework that allow us to analyze the development of the decorative scheme of the throne rooms located at the palaces built by the Assyrians kings during the period that become known as Neo- Assyrian (934 – 609 BC). We consider decorative scheme as being the presence of texts and images in an architectural setting.
  • Cambridge University Press 978-1-108-49596-7 — the Amorites and the Bronze Age Near East Aaron A

    Cambridge University Press 978-1-108-49596-7 — the Amorites and the Bronze Age Near East Aaron A

    Cambridge University Press 978-1-108-49596-7 — The Amorites and the Bronze Age Near East Aaron A. Burke Index More Information INDEX ꜤꜢmw (Egyptian term), 145–47 See also Asiatics “communities of practice,” 18–20, 38–40, 42, (Egypt) 347–48 decline of, 350–51 A’ali, 226 during Early Bronze Age, 31 ‘Aa-zeh-Re’ Nehesy, 316–17 Ebla, 38–40, 56, 178 Abarsal, 45 emergence of, 23, 346–47 Abda-El (Amorite), 153–54 extensification of, 18–20 Abi-eshuh, 297, 334–35 hollow cities, 178–79 Abisare (Larsa), 160 Jazira, 38, 177 Abishemu I (Byblos), 175 “land rush,” 177–78 Abraham, 6 Mari, 38–40, 56, 177–79, 227–28 abu as symbolic kinship, 268–70 Nawar, 38, 40, 42 Abu en-Ni’aj, Tell, 65 Northern Levant, 177 Abu Hamad, 54 Qatna, 179 Abu Salabikh, 100 revival of, 176–80, 357 Abusch, Tzvi, 186 Shubat Enlil, 177–78, 180 Abydos, 220 social identity of Amorites and, 10 Achaemenid Empire, 12 Urkesh, 38, 42 Achsaph, 176 wool trade and, 23 ‘Adabal (deity), 40 Yamḫ ad, 179 Adad/Hadad (deity), 58–59, 134, 209–10, 228–29, zone of uncertainty and, 24, 174 264, 309–11, 338, 364 Ahbabu, 131 Adams, Robert, 128 Ahbutum (tribe), 97 Adamsah, 109 Ahktoy III, 147 Adba-El (Mari), 153–54 Ahmar, Tell, 51–53, 56, 136, 228 Addahushu (Elam), 320 Ahmose, 341–42 Ader, 50 ‘Ai, 33 Admonitions of Ipuwer, 172 ‘Ain Zurekiyeh, 237–38 aDNA. See DNA Ajjul, Tell el-, 142, 237–38, 326, 329, 341–42 Adnigkudu (deity), 254–55 Akkadian Empire.
  • The Lagash-Umma Border Conflict 9

    The Lagash-Umma Border Conflict 9

    CHAPTER I Introduction: Early Civilization and Political Organization in Babylonia' The earliest large urban agglomoration in Mesopotamia was the city known as Uruk in later texts. There, around 3000 B.C., certain distinctive features of historic Mesopotamian civilization emerged: the cylinder seal, a system of writing that soon became cuneiform, a repertoire of religious symbolism, and various artistic and architectural motifs and conven- tions.' Another feature of Mesopotamian civilization in the early historic periods, the con- stellation of more or less independent city-states resistant to the establishment of a strong central political force, was probably characteristic of this proto-historic period as well. Uruk, by virtue of its size, must have played a dominant role in southern Babylonia, and the city of Kish probably played a similar role in the north. From the period that archaeologists call Early Dynastic I1 (ED 11), beginning about 2700 B.c.,~the appearance of walls around Babylonian cities suggests that inter-city warfare had become institutionalized. The earliest royal inscriptions, which date to this period, belong to kings of Kish, a northern Babylonian city, but were found in the Diyala region, at Nippur, at Adab and at Girsu. Those at Adab and Girsu are from the later part of ED I1 and are in the name of Mesalim, king of Kish, accompanied by the names of the respective local ruler^.^ The king of Kish thus exercised hegemony far beyond the walls of his own city, and the memory of this particular king survived in native historical traditions for centuries: the Lagash-Umma border was represented in the inscriptions from Lagash as having been determined by the god Enlil, but actually drawn by Mesalim, king of Kish (IV.1).
  • Chapter 2 the Rise of Civilization: the Art of the Ancient Near East

    Chapter 2 the Rise of Civilization: the Art of the Ancient Near East

    Chapter 2 The Rise of Civilization: The Art of the Ancient Near East Multiple Choice Select the response that best answers the question or completes the statement. 1. The change in the nature of daily life, from hunter and gatherer to farmer and herder, first occurred in ______________. a. Mesopotamia c. Africa b. Europe d. Asia 2. Mesopotamia is known as the __________ ___________. a. River Crescent c. Fertile Crescent b. Delta Crescent d. Pearl Crescent 3. The ___________ ruled the northern Mesopotamian empire during the ninth through seventh centuries BCE. a. Sumerians c. Akkadians b. Assyrians d. Sasanians 4. What site did Leonard Woolley excavate in the 1920s in southern Mesopotamia? a. Royal Cemetery at Giza c. Royal Palace at Nineveh b. Ziggurat of Ur d. Royal Cemetery at Ur 5. The ___________ are credited with developing the first known writing system. a. Assyrians c. Sumerians b. Babylonians d. Elamites 6. The most famous Sumerian work of literature is the _____________________. a. Illiad c. Odyssey b. Tale of Gilgamesh d. Tale of Urnanshe 7. In Sumerian cities the ________ formed the nucleus of the city. a. temple c. palace b. market d. treasury 8. The temples of Sumer were placed on high platforms or ___________. a. pyramids c. daises b. ziggurats d. towers 9. What is the theme of the Stele of the Vultures? a. warfare c. trade b. prayer d. royal contract 7 10. The earliest known name of an author is _____________. a. Nanna c. Sargon b. Enheduanna d. Gudea 11. Hammurabi is most famous for his ____________.
  • An AZ Companion to Ancient Egyptian Architecture Free

    An AZ Companion to Ancient Egyptian Architecture Free

    FREE THE MONUMENTS OF EGYPT: AN A-Z COMPANION TO ANCIENT EGYPTIAN ARCHITECTURE PDF Dieter Arnold | 288 pages | 30 Nov 2009 | I.B.Tauris & Co Ltd | 9781848850422 | English | London, United Kingdom Art of ancient Egypt - Wikipedia Egyptian inventions and discoveries are objects, processes or techniques which owe their existence either partially or entirely to an Egyptian person. Often, things which are discovered for the first time, are also called "inventions", and in many cases, there is no clear line between the two. Below is a list of such inventions. Furniture became common first in Ancient Egypt during the Naqada culture. During that period a wide variety of furniture pieces were invented and used. Atalla and Dawon Kahng at Bell Labs in[] enabled the practical use of metal—oxide—semiconductor MOS transistors as memory cell storage elements, a function previously served by magnetic cores. MOSFET scaling and miniaturization see List of semiconductor scale examples have been the primary factors behind the rapid exponential growth of electronic semiconductor technology since the s, [] as the rapid miniaturization of MOSFETs has been largely responsible for the increasing The Monuments of Egypt: An A-Z Companion to Ancient Egyptian Architecture densityincreasing performance and decreasing power consumption of integrated circuit chips and electronic devices since the s. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Redirected from List of egyptian inventions and discoveries. This section needs expansion. You can help by adding to it. June Archived from the original on Archived from the original PDF on January A history of ancient Egypt. Shaw, Ian, —. Oxford, UK: — Mark 4 November Ancient History Encyclopedia.
  • Povestiri Din Orient (Tâlcuite În Versuri Pentru Cei Mici) Volumul I: Mul-An, Muzica Stelelor Cerului Şi Monologul Scepticului

    Povestiri Din Orient (Tâlcuite În Versuri Pentru Cei Mici) Volumul I: Mul-An, Muzica Stelelor Cerului Şi Monologul Scepticului

    DOBRE I. VALENTIN-CLAUDIU – POVESTIRI DIN ORIENT (TÂLCUITE ÎN VERSURI PENTRU CEI MICI) VOLUMUL I: MUL-AN, MUZICA STELELOR CERULUI ŞI MONOLOGUL SCEPTICULUI Valentin-Claudiu I. DOBRE POVESTIRI DIN ORIENT (TÂLCUITE ÎN VERSURI PENTRU CEI MICI) VOLUMUL I: MUL-AN, MUZICA STELELOR CERULUI ŞI MONOLOGUL SCEPTICULUI 0 - 962 1 3 - 0 COLECŢIA ZIDUL DE HÂRTIE - 973 Ediţie electronică pdf CD-ROM 2020 - BUCUREŞTI 2020 ISBN ISBN 978 ISBN 978-973-0-31962-0 1 Page DOBRE I. VALENTIN-CLAUDIU – POVESTIRI DIN ORIENT (TÂLCUITE ÎN VERSURI PENTRU CEI MICI) VOLUMUL I: MUL-AN, MUZICA STELELOR CERULUI ŞI MONOLOGUL SCEPTICULUI Valentin-Claudiu I. DOBRE POVESTIRI DIN ORIENT (TÂLCUITE ÎN VERSURI PENTRU CEI MICI). VOLUMUL I: MUL-AN, MUZICA STELELOR CERULUI ŞI MONOLOGUL SCEPTICULUI Ediţie electronică pdf CD-ROM 2020 0 Dedicată Celor Dragi, Soţiei mele iubite - 962 1 3 - COLECŢIA ZIDUL DE HÂRTIE 0 - 973 - Ediţie electronică pdf CD-ROM 2020 Bucureşti 2020 ISBN 978 ISBN 978-973-0-31962-0 2 Page DOBRE I. VALENTIN-CLAUDIU – POVESTIRI DIN ORIENT (TÂLCUITE ÎN VERSURI PENTRU CEI MICI) VOLUMUL I: MUL-AN, MUZICA STELELOR CERULUI ŞI MONOLOGUL SCEPTICULUI Drepturile asupra acestei ediţii aparţin autorului. Orice reproducere fără indicarea sursei strict prohibită. Lucrările grafice redate nu au restricții de reproducere. SURSELE TEXTELOR ORIGINALE: - ETCSL Project, Faculty of Oriental Studies, University of Oxford; Adresă site: http: //etcsl.orinst.ox.ac.uk/edition2/etcslbynumb.php - Cuneiform Digital Library Initiative (CDLB- Bulletin şi CDLJ- Journal); Adresă site: http: //cdli.ucla.edu - ETCSRI Corpus; Adresă site: http: //oracc.museum.upenn.edu/etcsri/corpus - Colecţia Montserrat Museum, Barcelona, Spain, studii Molina Manuel; Adresă site: http: //bdtns.filol.csic.es - Cuneiform Monographs Vol.
  • Archaeology's Service to Ancient Near Eastern History

    Archaeology's Service to Ancient Near Eastern History

    A COMPANION TO THE ANCIENT NEAR EAST BLACKWELL COMPANIONS TO THE ANCIENT WORLD This series provides sophisticated and authoritative overviews of periods of ancient history, genres of classical literature, and the most important themes in ancient culture. Each volume comprises approximately 25 to 40 concise essays written by individual scholars within their area of special- ization. The essays are written in a clear, provocative, and lively manner, designed for an international audience of scholars, students, and general readers. ANCIENT HISTORY Edited by Ian Worthington A Companion to the Roman Army A Companion to Ancient Epic Edited by Paul Erdkamp Edited by John Miles Foley A Companion to the Roman Republic A Companion to Greek Tragedy Edited by Nathan Rosenstein and Robert Morstein‐Marx Edited by Justina Gregory A Companion to the Roman Empire A Companion to Latin Literature Edited by David S. Potter Edited by Stephen Harrison A Companion to the Classical Greek World A Companion to Greek and Roman Political Thought Edited by Konrad H. Kinzl Edited by Ryan K. Balot A Companion to the Ancient Near East A Companion to Ovid Edited by Daniel C. Snell Edited by Peter E. Knox A Companion to the Hellenistic World A Companion to the Ancient Greek Language Edited by Andrew Erskine Edited by Egbert Bakker A Companion to Late Antiquity A Companion to Hellenistic Literature Edited by Philip Rousseau Edited by Martine Cuypers and James J. Clauss A Companion to Ancient History A Companion to Vergil’s Aeneid and its Tradition Edited by Andrew Erskine Edited by Joseph Farrell and Michael C.
  • Eannatum and the “King of Kiš”? Another Look at the Stele of the Vultures and “Cartouches” in Early Sumerian Art

    Eannatum and the “King of Kiš”? Another Look at the Stele of the Vultures and “Cartouches” in Early Sumerian Art

    CHAPTER SEVENTEEN EANNATUM AND THE “KING OF KIŠ”? ANOTHER LOOK AT THE STELE OF THE VULTURES AND “CARTOUCHES” IN EARLY SUMERIAN ART The Stele of Eannatum of Lagaš (the so-called ‘Stele of the Vultures’) is a monument known to most students of the Ancient Near East. In both text and image, front and back, it documents the victory of the city-state of Lagaš over neighboring Umma in a battle arising out of long-standing disputes concerning land- and water-rights.1 The confl ict is attested throughout the entire Early Dynastic III period, both before and after Eannatum, ruler of Lagaš, who commissioned this particular stele sometime ca. 2460 b.c.2 In its present state at the Musée du Louvre,3 one is easily led to think of the stele as a complete monument; yet the restoration actually con- sists of only 7 fragments—one purchased on the market, and six found scattered around Tell K, where the temple of Ningirsu was located, at the site of Tello, ancient Girsu, a city within the state of Lagaš.4 Upon * This article originally appeared as “Eannatum and the ‘King of Kiš’? Another look at the Stele of the Vultures and ‘Cartouches’ in Early Sumerian Art,” Zeitschrift für Assyriologie 76 (1986), pp. 205–212. 1 The text was originally read and published by F. Thureau-Dangin, Restitution matérielle de la Stèle des Vautours (1909) 42–63 (hereafter RMSV). Th. Jacobsen published a new reading, heavily restored, for the fi rst ten columns, in “Translation of the Stele of the Vultures, Cols.
  • Routledge Worlds : Sumerian World

    Routledge Worlds : Sumerian World

    THE SUMERIANᇹᇺᇻ WORLD The Sumerian World explores the archaeology, history and art of southern Mesopotamia and its relationships with its neighbours from c.3000 to 2000BC. Including material hitherto unpublished from recent excavations, the articles are organised thematically using evidence from archaeology, texts and the natural sciences. This broad treatment will also make the volume of interest to students looking for comparative data in allied subjects such as ancient literature and early religions. Providing an authoritative, comprehensive and up-to-date overview of the Sumerian period written by some of the best-qualified scholars in the field, The Sumerian World will satisfy students, researchers, academics and the knowledgeable layperson wishing to understand the world of southern Mesopotamia in the third millennium. Harriet Crawford is Reader Emerita at UCL’s Institute of Archaeology and a senior fellow at the McDonald Institute, Cambridge. She is a specialist in the archaeology of the Sumerians and has worked widely in Iraq and the Gulf. She is the author of Sumer and the Sumerians (second edition, 2004). THE ROUTLEDGE WORLDS THE REFORMATION WORLD THE ROMAN WORLD Edited by Andrew Pettegree Edited by John Wacher THE MEDIEVAL WORLD THE HINDU WORLD Edited by Peter Linehan, Janet L. Nelson Edited by Sushil Mittal and Gene Thursby THE BYZANTINE WORLD THE WORLD OF THE Edited by Paul Stephenson AMERICAN WEST Edited by Gordon Morris Bakken THE VIKING WORLD Edited by Stefan Brink in collaboration THE ELIZABETHAN WORLD with Neil Price Edited by Susan Doran and Norman Jones THE BABYLONIAN WORLD THE OTTOMAN WORLD Edited by Gwendolyn Leick Edited by Christine Woodhead THE EGYPTIAN WORLD THE VICTORIAN WORLD Edited by Toby Wilkinson Edited by Marin Hewitt THE ISLAMIC WORLD THE ORTHODOX CHRISTIAN Edited by Andrew Rippin WORLD Edited by Augustine Casiday THE WORLD OF POMPEI Edited by Pedar W.
  • “The Symbolic Meaning for Divinity Concept and Landscape Representation in “Victory Stele of Naram-Sin”

    “The Symbolic Meaning for Divinity Concept and Landscape Representation in “Victory Stele of Naram-Sin”

    مجمة العمارة والفنون العدد العاشر “The Symbolic Meaning for Divinity concept and Landscape Representation in “Victory Stele of Naram-Sin” Dr. Fayrouz Mohamed Mahmoud Ibrahim Lecturer at the Department of Decoration Faculty of Applied Arts – Damietta University The Victory Stele of Naram-Sin: The Victory Stele of Naram-Sin Louvre museum, Paris DOI: 10.12816/0044829 809 مجمة العمارة والفنون العدد العاشر The Abstract: The current paper presents an artistic analysis based on the visual features for one of the most significant stone memorial Stele of “Naram-Sin” . The Victory Stele was created to commemorate Naram-Sin‟s victory over Satuni king of „Lullubi‟, a nomadic tribe. The paper discusses the importance of the Stele as an important historical record in terms of artistic features where the artist deliberately depicts landscape as well as the embodiment of the victorious Akkadian king. It is known that the representation of the concept of divinity differed from civilization to another, but the paper highlights the way in which Akkadian artist expresses the concept of the power of divinity and its relation to the power of kingship in the memorial Stele of King Naram-Sin. The current paper investigates the distinctive and fundamental role of the artistic elements of the divinity power collaborating with the royal one, in the victory over the enemies. This is reflected in many artistic manifestations that illustrate the concept of divinity in an important reference from the artist to its importance of this belief in political and military life, which was also associated with the appearance and the body of the king and his performance.