DOCSLIB.ORG

Montenegro and Marine Protected Areas

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Montenegro and Marine Protected Areas MONTENEGRO AND MARINE PROTECTED AREAS LEGAL AND INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK ASSESSMENT FOR CONSERVATION OF COASTAL AND MARINE BIODIVERSITY AND THE ESTABLISHMENT OF MPAS Montenegro and Marine Protected Areas Legal and institutional framework assessment for conservation of coastal and marine biodiversity and the establishment of MPAs 2014 The present document was prepared by: The designation of geographical entities in this UNEP/MAP – United Nations Environment Programme / Mediterranean Action Plan book, and the presentation of the material, do not RAC/SPA – Regional Activity Centre for Specially Protected Areas imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever Regional Activity Centre for Specially Protected Areas (RAC/SPA) on the part of UNEP/MAP-RAC/SPA, IUCN, or the Boulevard du Leader Yasser Arafat MAVA Foundation concerning the legal status of B.P. 337, 1080 Tunis Cedex, Tunisia any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, Tel: +216 71 206 649 / 71 206 485 / 71 206 765 or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or Fax: +216 71 206 490 boundaries. www.rac-spa.org The views expressed in this publication do not And necessarily reflect those of UNEP/MAP-RAC/SPA, IUCN, or the MAVA Foundation. IUCN-Med: International Union for Conservation of Nature Reproduction of this publication for educational IUCN Centre for Mediterranean Cooperation or other non-commercial purposes is authorized C/ Marie Curie 22 without prior written permission from the copyright 29590 Campanillas, Malaga, Spain holder provided the source is fully acknowledged. Tel: +34 952 028430 Fax: +34 952 028145 Reproduction of this publication for resale or other www.iucn.org/mediterranean commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written permission of the copyright holder. IUCN ELC: IUCN Environmental Law Centre IUCN Environmental Law Centre Published by: RAC/SPA and IUCN-Med. Godesberger Allee 108-112 53175 Bonn, Germany Copyright: © 2014 – RAC/SPA and IUCN-Med. Phone: ++49 - 228 - 2692 - 231 Citation: Montenegro and Marine Protected Areas: Fax: ++49 - 228 - 2692 - 250 Legal and Institutional framework assessment for Email: [email protected] conservation of coastal and marine biodiversity and the establishment of MPAs. RAC/SPA and IUCN-Med. Ed. RAC/SPA - MedMPAnet Project, Tunis. 72 pp. Product management: François-Xavier Bouillon, F-06800 Cagnes-sur-Mer. Editor: Deadline SARL, F-06570 Saint-Paul-de-Vence. Basic data collection by Faidra Bazigou, Consultant. A version in Montenegrin is also available. Translation: Dragana Petronijevic, Marina Marković Translation into English of the articles of the Montenegrin laws cited in this document isn’t official. Cover Layout: Tesnim Amri. Cover photo: Kotor Bay, Atef LIMAM. Available from: UNEP/MAP-RAC/SPA: www.rac-spa.org IUCN-Med: www.iucn.org/mediterranean Index List of acronyms ......................................................................4 II. STAKEHOLDERS ..........................................................36 Foreword .................................................................................5 A. Procedure for the involvement of stakeholders ..............38 Acknowledgements .................................................................7 III. MAIN GAPS IN EXISTING PROCEDURES OF Introduction .............................................................................9 ESTABLISHMENT OF MANAGEMENT OF Context in Montenegro ..........................................................11 PROTECTED NATURAL ASSETS ................................38 Methodological approach .....................................................15 IV. ONGOING INTERNATIONAL PROJECTS AND NETWORKING ......................................................39 PART I A. International projects ......................................................39 LEGAL AND INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK FOR MARINE PROTECTED AREAS B. Networking ......................................................................40 IN MONTENEGRO ...............................................................17 I. LEGAL AND POLICY FRAMEWORK PART III FOR MARINE PROTECTED AREAS ............................17 GENERAL RECOMMENDATIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT A. Legal instruments for MPAs ............................................17 OF MARINE PROTECTED AREAS SYSTEM IN ....................................................................43 B. Other relevant legal instruments .....................................19 MONTENEGRO C. Existing policies regarding biodiversity conservation I. CONCLUSIONS, GENERAL .......................43 in Montenegro .................................................................21 AND SPECIFIC RECOMMENDATIONS A. Legislation and policy .....................................................44 II. SPECIFIC GOVERNANCE AND MANAGEMENT B. Management mechanism and management structure FOR MARINE PROTECTED AREAS ............................22 for marine protected areas..............................................46 A. Governance ....................................................................22 C. Coordination with existing Marine and Coastal B. Management ...................................................................24 Management Structures .................................................50 C. Roadmap and Timeframe of the Process of Establishment of Protected Natural Assets ................ 27 II. STRENGTHENING TECHNICAL AND HUMAN CAPACITIES OF MANAGERS ...............51 D. Financing ........................................................................28 III. MECHANISM OF INVOLVEMENT III. MAIN GAPS IN EXISTING PROCEDURES OF STAKEHOLDERS ....................................................52 AND DECISION MAKING PROCESS OF ESTABLISHMENT OF MANAGEMENT IV. FINANCING SOURCES FOR MPAS .............................52 OF PROTECTED NATURAL ASSETS ..........................29 IV. INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS FOR MARINE ANNEXES .............................................................................55 PROTECTED AREAS ....................................................30 Annex I – Case Studies of MPA Network Management: A. State Administration ........................................................30 Italy, France And Croatia .......................................................56 B. Local governments .........................................................32 Case Study 1: C. Institutional capacities (human resources) .....................33 Management of the national MPA network in Italy ................56 Case Study 2: Management of the national MPA network in France............57 PART II NON-GOVERNMENTAL STAKEHOLDERS, Case Study 3: PROJECTS AND NETWORKING RELATED Management of the national MPA network in Croatia ...........60 TO THE MARINE ENVIRONMENT AND MARINE Annex II – Report of the national workshop on MPAs PROTECTED AREAS IN MONTENEGRO ..........................35 held in Podgorica, Montenegro in July 2013, organized I. NON-GOVERNMENTAL STAKEHOLDERS by the Minister of Sustainable Development and Tourism, INVOLVED IN MARINE CONSERVATION ....................35 RAC/SPA and IUCN-Med .....................................................63 A. Non-governmental organizations (NGOs) ......................35 Annex III – Plan for future MPAs in Montenegro ..................70 B. Private Sector ..................................................................36 C. Public participation .........................................................36 3 LIST OF ACRONYMS AdriaPAN Adriatic Protected Areas Network AECID Spanish Agency for International Cooperation to Development CBD Convention on Biological Diversity CBD Convention on Biological Diversity CITES Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora EIA Environmental impact assessment EPA Environmental Protection Agency EU European Union FFEM Fonds Français pour l’Environnement Mondial IMELS Italian Ministry of Environment, Land and Sea IUCN International Union for the Conservation of Nature IUCN ELC Environment Law Center of the International Union for the Conservation of Nature IUCN Med Center for Mediterranean Cooperation of the International Union for the Conservation of Nature MAP Mediterranean Action Plan MCPA Marine and Coastal Protected Area MedMPAnet The Regional Project for the Development of a Mediterranean Marine and Coastal Protected Areas (MPAs) Network through the boosting of MPAs creation and management MedPAN Network of Marine Protected Areas Managers in the Mediterranean MedPartnership Strategic Partnership for the Mediterranean Sea Large Marine Ecosystem MoU Memorandum of Understanding MPA Marine Protected Area MSDT Ministry of Sustainable Development and Tourism NBSAP National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan NP National Park NS ICZM Draft National Strategy on Integrated Coastal Zone Management NSSD National Strategy on Sustainable Development OG Official Gazette PA Protected Area PCA Protected Coastal Area PE CZM Public Enterprise for Coastal Zone RAC/SPA Regional Activity Centre for Specially Protected Areas REC Regional Environmental Centre RM Republic of Montenegro SAP/BIO Strategic Action Plan for the Protection of Biodiversity of the Mediterranean SPA/BD Protocol concerning Specially Protected Areas and Biological Diversity in the Mediterranean SPAMI Specially Protected Areas of Mediterranean Importance SPM Spatial Plan of Montenegro UNEP United Nations Environment Programme WWF-MedPO World Wide Fund for Nature - Mediterranean Programme Office 4 Foreword This document delivers the state of the art of the legal and The
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ESS9 Appendix A3 Political Parties Ed
    APPENDIX A3 POLITICAL PARTIES, ESS9 - 2018 ed. 3.0 Austria 2 Belgium 4 Bulgaria 7 Croatia 8 Cyprus 10 Czechia 12 Denmark 14 Estonia 15 Finland 17 France 19 Germany 20 Hungary 21 Iceland 23 Ireland 25 Italy 26 Latvia 28 Lithuania 31 Montenegro 34 Netherlands 36 Norway 38 Poland 40 Portugal 44 Serbia 47 Slovakia 52 Slovenia 53 Spain 54 Sweden 57 Switzerland 58 United Kingdom 61 Version Notes, ESS9 Appendix A3 POLITICAL PARTIES ESS9 edition 3.0 (published 10.12.20): Changes from previous edition: Additional countries: Denmark, Iceland. ESS9 edition 2.0 (published 15.06.20): Changes from previous edition: Additional countries: Croatia, Latvia, Lithuania, Montenegro, Portugal, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden. Austria 1. Political parties Language used in data file: German Year of last election: 2017 Official party names, English 1. Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs (SPÖ) - Social Democratic Party of Austria - 26.9 % names/translation, and size in last 2. Österreichische Volkspartei (ÖVP) - Austrian People's Party - 31.5 % election: 3. Freiheitliche Partei Österreichs (FPÖ) - Freedom Party of Austria - 26.0 % 4. Liste Peter Pilz (PILZ) - PILZ - 4.4 % 5. Die Grünen – Die Grüne Alternative (Grüne) - The Greens – The Green Alternative - 3.8 % 6. Kommunistische Partei Österreichs (KPÖ) - Communist Party of Austria - 0.8 % 7. NEOS – Das Neue Österreich und Liberales Forum (NEOS) - NEOS – The New Austria and Liberal Forum - 5.3 % 8. G!LT - Verein zur Förderung der Offenen Demokratie (GILT) - My Vote Counts! - 1.0 % Description of political parties listed 1. The Social Democratic Party (Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs, or SPÖ) is a social above democratic/center-left political party that was founded in 1888 as the Social Democratic Worker's Party (Sozialdemokratische Arbeiterpartei, or SDAP), when Victor Adler managed to unite the various opposing factions.
    [Show full text]
  • Sida Application
    SIDA APPLICATION VO1 2016-2018 Green Forum Pustegränd 1-3 118 20 Stockholm [email protected] ABBREVIATIONS AGF African Greens Federation AGP Albanian Green Party CDN Cooperation & Development Network of Eastern Europe CEMAT Centro Mesoamericano de Estudios sobre Tecnolgìa Apropriada, Guatemala CEPROCA Centro de Produccion, Promocion y Capacitacion, Bolivia CSO Civil Society Organization EE Eastern Europe EGP European Green Parties (The Green group of the EU Parliament) ENoPS European Network of Political Foundations EVS European Voluntary Service (Programme) FYEG Federation of Young European Greens GEF Green European Foundation (PAO for the Green Group in EU) GeYG Georgian Young Greens GGWN Global Greens Women’s Network Groen Flemish Greens LGBT (Q) Lesbian, Gay, Bi-sexual, Transsexual (Questioning) NGO Non-Governmental Organization ODA Official Development Assistance PAO Politically Affiliated Organization PVE Partido verde ecología (The Bolivian Green Party) PME Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation PWC Price Waterhouse Coopers – Previous auditors of Green Forum PYPA Programme for Young Politicians in Africa Sage Accounting Software, used in AGF SDGs Sustainable Development Goals SGY Serbian Green Youth WF Westminster Foundation (UK). British found. handling PAO-support of British greens INDEX A. ADMINISTRATIVE INFORMATION 4 B. PROGRAMME DESCRIPTION 5 2 1. SUMMARY PROGRAMME DESCRIPTION AND APPROACH 5 2. GREEN FORUM AND THE GREEN MOVEMENT 6 3. OVERALL CONTEXTUAL ANALYSIS 7 4. ANALYSIS OF PROBLEMS AND PARTNERS 8 4.1 Problem Analysis 8 4.2 Analysis of prospects for the programme’s feasibility 8 4.3 Analysis of cooperation partners and programmes 9 5. GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND THE STRATEGIC FRAMEWORK 10 5.1 The revised Green Forum Strategy and the overall objectives of the programme 10 5.2 Indicators 11 5.3 Human Rights Based Approach 11 6.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. EGP Recommendation Letter URA Montenegro
    Civic Movement URA (United Reform Action) Application for EGP Membership EGP Committee Recommendation Letter General Introduction The European Green Party (EGP) conducted a study visit in August 2019 and a fact-finding mission in early March 2020, as part of the application process of Montenegrin political party URA (United Reform Action). URA has officially applied for EGP membership in October 2019. The EGP has been in contact with URA since 2018. Since then, their party leader attended the Council in Berlin (Germany) in November 2018. After their application, a delegation was invited to the following Council in Tampere (Finland) in November 2019. In August 2019, the study visit included meetings with different structures of URA, activists from NGOs and civil society, supporting citizens movements and struggles with several cases of environmental destruction. The visit showed that URA is a well-established party, respected and in cooperation with civil society, and with a potential to grow. In March 2020, the EGP delegation to Montenegro was made up of Thomas Waitz (Co-Chair), Mar Garcia (Secretary General) and Mélanie Vogel (Member of the Committee responsible for Montenegro). This mission included meetings with the central leadership and Political and Advisory board of URA, their Youth and Women Forum, several local councillors and the local board in Budva. Other meetings were organized with EU Ambassador Orav Aivo and German Ambassador Robert Weber, NGOs Hocu da ostanem and Kor - Coalition for Sustainable Development, LGBT Forum Progress, the chief editor of Balkan Insight, and a Professor of International Environmental and Private Law at the State Law university.
    [Show full text]
  • Coastal Tourism in Montenegro – Economic Dynamics, Spatial Developments and Future Perspectives
    HRVATSKI GEOGRAFSKI GLASNIK 73/1, 165 – 180 (2011.) UDK 379.8:911.3](497.16) Preliminary communication 911.3:33](497.16) Prethodno priopćenje Coastal Tourism in Montenegro – Economic Dynamics, Spatial Developments and Future Perspectives Matthias Bickert, Daniel Göler, Holger Lehmeier Montenegro seeks its future perspectives in tourism. And there are good reasons for that: The country was considered to be the fastest growing tourism market worldwide in 2007. Notwithstanding a slight decrease during the last years, tourism is still seen as a crucial factor for future economic development. This seems to be a viable option if we consider Montenegro’s natural potential, its beneficial position on the Adriatic coastline and the experience in tourism gained in the many years since the 1970s. These dynamic developments were motivation enough to explore tourism in Montene- gro in a research project with strong empirical evidence, organised as co-operation between Universities from Germany, Albania, Montenegro and Serbia. Our empirical approach included semi-structured, flexible interviews with different types of stakeholders. Since tourism in Montenegro is still almost entirely limited to the coast, we chose three coastal hot-spots in tourism, namely Kotor, Budva and Ulcinj. Our results show that the current development in tourism can surely be considered as progressive and dynamic. But it is also strongly affected by multiple polarisations and divergent trends. There is a need for infrastructural upgrades in the mass tourism sector, which is for the most part a low budget market with very difficult future perspectives. At the same time, there is a small but growing number of very exclusive offers, often seen as the vanguard of Montenegro’s future as an upper class tourists’ destination.
    [Show full text]
  • 08-78 ZAPISNIK Sa 142. Sjednice 40. Vlade
    ==================================================== ZA INTERNU UPOTREBU Broj: 08-78 Z A P I S N I K sa 142. sjednice 40. Vlade Crne Gore, koja je odrţana 21. januara 2016. godine ================================================== Podgorica, 21. januara 2016. godine Crna Gora VLADA CRNE GORE Broj: 08-78 Podgorica, 21. januara 2016. godine Z A P I S N I K sa 142. sjednice 40. Vlade Crne Gore, koja je odrţana 21. januara 2016. godine Predsjedava: Milo Đukanović, predsjednik Vlade. Prisutni su: prof. dr Igor Lukšić, Duško Marković, prof. dr Vujica Lazović i Rafet Husović, potpredsjednici Vlade; prof. dr Milica Pejanović- Đurišić, mr Zoran Paţin, Raško Konjević, dr Radoje Ţugić, dr Suad Numanović, dr Vladimir Kavarić, Branimir Gvozdenović, Ivan Brajović, prof. dr Petar Ivanović, Zorica Kovačević, Pavle Goranović, dr Sanja Vlahović, prof. dr Budimir Šegrt i Marija Vučinović, članovi Vlade i Ţarko Šturanović, generalni sekretar Vlade. Odsutan je mr Predrag Bošković, član Vlade. Pored članova Vlade, sjednici prisustvuju: Dušanka Jauković, sekretarka Sekretarijata za zakonodavstvo, Ivo Đoković, pomoćnik generalnog sekretara Vlade, Vera Mijatović, pomoćnica generalnog sekretara Vlade, Sneţana Radović, generalna direktorica Direktorata za evropske poslove Ministarstva vanjskih poslova i evropskih integracija, Slobodan Filipović, sekretar Ministarstva prosvjete, Nemanja Katnić, sekretar Ministarstva poljoprivrede i ruralnog razvoja, Tijana Stanković, savjetnica potpredsjednika Vlade za ekonomsku politiku i finansijski sistem, Radmila Raonić, šefica Kabineta ministra finansija, Rajko Kovačević, šef Kabineta predsjednika Vlade, Valentina Radulović-Šćepanović i SrĎan Spaić, savjetnici predsjednika Vlade i SrĎan Kusovac, savjetnik predsjednika Vlade – rukovodilac Sluţbe – Biroa za odnose s javnošću. 2 Za ovu sjednicu, Vlada je utvrdila sljedeći Dnevni red: 1. Predlog programa rada Vlade Crne Gore za 2016.
    [Show full text]
  • DIKTAS Country Report
    Protection and Sustainable Use of the Dinaric Karst Transboundary Aquifer System MONTENEGO COUNTRY REPORT October 2012 1 2 CONTENT: HIDROGEOLOGICAL REPORT 4 SOCIO-ECONOMIC REPORT 77 STAKEHOLDERS ANALYSES REPORT 137 LEGAL AND INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK AND POLICY REPORT 170 3 Protection and Sustainable Use of the Dinaric Karst Transboundary Aquifer System Working Group 1 Hydrogeological Report – Draft V.1. Chapter 1-8 Montenegro by Dragan Radojević National consultant for Hydrogeology October 2012 4 Content 1. Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... 3 1.1. Project tasks and role of WG1 ....................................................................................... 3 1.2. General on karst – term, distribution, importance ......................................................... 4 1.3. Historical review of karst researches ............................................................................. 7 2. Physiography and climate ................................................................................................ 9 2.1. Geographic position and boundaries ............................................................................. 9 2.2. Vegetation and land cover .......................................................................................... 10 2.3. Rainfall regime ................................................................................................. 12 2.4. Air temperature .........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Montenegro and Marine Protected Areas
    MONTENEGRO AND MARINE PROTECTED AREAS LEGAL AND INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK ASSESSMENT FOR CONSERVATION OF COASTAL AND MARINE BIODIVERSITY Regional Activity Centre AND THE ESTABLISHMENT OF MPAS for Specially Protected Areas (RAC/SPA) Boulevard du Leader Yasser Arafat B.P. 337 - 1080 Tunis Cedex - TUNISIA Tel. : +216 71 206 649 / 485 / 765 Fax : +216 71 206 490 e-mail : [email protected] www.rac-spa.org Montenegro and Marine Protected Areas Legal and institutional framework assessment for conservation of coastal and marine biodiversity and the establishment of MPAs 2014 The present document was prepared by: The designation of geographical entities in this UNEP/MAP – United Nations Environment Programme / Mediterranean Action Plan book, and the presentation of the material, do not RAC/SPA – Regional Activity Centre for Specially Protected Areas imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever Regional Activity Centre for Specially Protected Areas (RAC/SPA) on the part of UNEP/MAP-RAC/SPA, IUCN, or the Boulevard du Leader Yasser Arafat MAVA Foundation concerning the legal status of B.P. 337, 1080 Tunis Cedex, Tunisia any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, Tel: +216 71 206 649 / 71 206 485 / 71 206 765 or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or Fax: +216 71 206 490 boundaries. www.rac-spa.org The views expressed in this publication do not And necessarily reflect those of UNEP/MAP-RAC/SPA, IUCN, or the MAVA Foundation. IUCN-Med: International Union for Conservation of Nature Reproduction of this publication for educational IUCN Centre for Mediterranean Cooperation or other non-commercial purposes is authorized C/ Marie Curie 22 without prior written permission from the copyright 29590 Campanillas, Malaga, Spain holder provided the source is fully acknowledged.
    [Show full text]
  • For Buna/Bojana Area
    Integrat ed Recources Management Plan (I RMP) for Buna/Bojana Area DRAFT (July 2015) 1 List of figures ................................................................................................................................. 5 List of tables .................................................................................................................................. 6 List of boxes .................................................................................................................................. 7 List of Images ................................................................................................................................ 7 Abbreviations ........................................................................................................................ 8 Context ................................................................................................................................ 10 The Integrated Plan Making Process ..................................................................................... 11 How to read the document .................................................................................................. 13 The Approach ...................................................................................................................... 13 PART A: THE PLAN................................................................................................................ 14 1. The foundations of the Plan - Establishing the process ..................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Management Plan for the Conservation and Sustainable Use of the Natural Values of the Privately Owned Nature Park "Solana Ulcinj", Montenegro
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/325252300 Management plan for the conservation and sustainable use of the natural values of the privately owned Nature Park "Solana Ulcinj", Montenegro Article · January 2008 CITATIONS READS 6 284 4 authors, including: Peter Sackl Universalmuseum Joanneum 40 PUBLICATIONS 107 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Adriatic Flyway Project View project All content following this page was uploaded by Peter Sackl on 19 May 2018. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. © Landesmuseum Joanneum Graz; download unter www.biologiezentrum.at Joannea Zool. 10: 5–84 (2008) Management plan for the conservation and sustainable use of the natural values of the privately owned Nature Park «Solana Ulcinj», Montenegro1 March 2007 Borut STUMBERGER, Peter SACKL, Darko SAVELJI and Martin SCHNEIDER-JACOBY Contents Abstract .................................................................................................... 7 Sažetak ..................................................................................................... 8 Abstrakt .................................................................................................... 9 Zusammenfassung ..................................................................................... 10 Glossary .................................................................................................... 12 1. Vision
    [Show full text]
  • Transnational Heritage and Cultural Policies in the Adriatic and Ionian Region (EUSAIR)
    Transnational heritage and cultural policies in the Adriatic and Ionian Region (EUSAIR) Routes4U | 11 Routes4U Project Transnational heritage and cultural policies in the Adriatic and Ionian Region (EUSAIR) Routes4U | 11 Council of Europe The opinions expressed in this work are the responsibility of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official policy of the Council of Europe. All requests concerning the reproduction or translation of all or part of this document should be addressed to the Directorate of Communication (F-67075 Strasbourg Cedex or [email protected]). All other correspondence concerning this document should be addressed to the Directorate General Democracy, Enlarged Partial Agreement on Cultural Routes. Cover: Documents and Publications Production Department (SPDP), Council of Europe Layout: Jouve, Paris Cover photos: Masimo Telò and Pixabay © Council of Europe, March 2020 Printed at the Council of Europe Contents FOREWORDS 5 PART I – CULTURAL ROUTES OF THE COUNCIL OF EUROPE AND THE EU STRATEGY FOR THE ADRIATIC AND IONIAN REGION (EUSAIR) 7 CULTURAL ROUTES OF THE COUNCIL OF EUROPE AND THE EU STRATEGY FOR THE ADRIATIC AND IONIAN REGION (EUSAIR) BY CONSTANZE METZGER 9 Council of Europe and Cultural Routes of the Council of Europe 9 European Union and EU Strategy for the Adriatic-Ionian Region (EUSAIR) 11 Joint Programme Routes4U 15 Cultural Routes in the Adriatic and Ionian Region 17 Development of new Cultural Routes 19 STUDY ON TRANSNATIONAL HERITAGE AND CULTURAL POLICIES IN THE ADRIATIC AND IONIAN REGION (EUSAIR)
    [Show full text]
  • Pup Pg Pdf 200000
    0DQDVWLU0RUDþD TS Kosovo B 400kV Jasenova Gnjili Potok Prisoja Kuta Kraljske Bare /LYHURYLüL 2]ULQLüL Jabuka 0HÿXULMHþMH Miolje polje Petrova Ravan Andrijevica Mrtvo Duboko Morakovo Dulipolje 3Hü Ulotina Povija Opasanica %RJHWLüL ANDRIJEVO Cerovo Strupovi P(58û,&$ ýDNRU Murino Velika 5RãFD 8 9HUXãD Kupinovo Lijeva Rijeka Vukotica Meteh Zeta 0RUDþD Brezojevica Brskut Kuti Zagorak 5$6/29,û, Poljica Slap Plav Vojno Selo Pelev Slatina Ubli *UQþDU Brijeg Gusinje Hoti 'HþDQH 'RQMH6WUDYþH Orja Luka 0,/8129,û, Dolja Danilovgrad Seoca 0RPþH Vusanje Markovina 5 .UåDQMD Velestovo Mrke 6SXå ĈXUNRYLüL %LRþH Lazarev Krst Grbe Ubli Orahovo ZLATICA Medun Milati Paprat Fundina âWLWDUL Rudine Cijevna D. Gorica 'UåDYQDJUDQLFD6WDWHERXQGDULHV Kosijeri Podgorica 6HOLãWH Granica teritorijalnog mora / State boundaries on the Adriatic See Cetinje Trabojin G. Kokoti Botun GE Opãtinska granica / Municipality boundaries Dobrsko Selo Meterizi 6NRUDü 5YDãL Rijeka Tuzi *UDGRYLLXUEDQL]RYDQDSRGUXþMD Gornji Ceklin Grbavci BoåDM &UQRMHYLüD Settlements and built-up areas Skadar 0RMDQRYLüL ALBANIJA Golubovci Rijeke / Rivers 0RUDþD Ponari 0DWDJXåL Razmjera / Scale 1:200 000 +(9DQĈHMHV $OEDQLMD N9 Albanija Elbasan 400 kV 0 2 4 6 8 10 20 30 km 0XåRYLüL Berislavci Jezera / Lakes Komarno (1 cm na karti 2 km u prirodi) Vranjina *UDÿDQL 7RPLüL STRUKTURA PROSTORNOG RAZVOJA: PROJEKCIJA Virpazar 1 6RWRQLüL STRUCTURE OF SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT: PROJECTION Seoca 15 Gluhi Do Skadarsko L E G E N D A / L E G E N D Limljani / Skadar MreåDQDVHOMD6HWWOHPHQWQHWZRUN NDPMHQDSRYUãLQD/DQGXVHSDWWHUQ
    [Show full text]
  • DETALJNI URBANISTIČKI PLAN Za Lokalitet “KODRE 1”
    DETALJNI URBANISTIČKI PLAN za lokalitet “KODRE 1” Granica zahvata Granica zahvata DUP-a definisana je Odlukom o izradi Detaljnog urbanističkog plana za lokalitet “Kodre 1” u Ulcinju. U grafičkom prilogu Topografsko–katastarska podloga sa prikazom granice plana dat je prikaz zahvata plana sa koordinatama granice plana. Površina zahvata Odlukom o izradi Detaljnog urbanističkog plana za lokalitet „Kodre 1“ u Ulcinju, obuhvaćen je prostor površine 71ha. Kroz detaljnu plansku razradu izvršeno je prilagođavanje saobraćajnom rešenju i kontaktnom planu pa se Detaljnim urbanističkim planom razrađuje prostor u ukupnoj površini od 72ha. Pravni osnov za izradu plana Pravni osnov za izradu Detaljnog urbanističkog plana za lokalitet “Kodre 1” u Ulcinju, sadržan je u: - Odluci o izradi Detaljnog urbanističkog plana za lokalitet “Kodre 1” u Ulcinju br. 01-3479/1-12 od 07.06.2012. god. koju je doneo Predsednik opštine Ulcinj. - Programskom zadatku sa svim relevantnim uslovima u vezi sa Zakonom o uređenju prostora i izgradnji objekata (Službeni list CG, broj 51/08, 40/10, 34/11, 47/11, 35/13, 39/13, 33/14). Programski zahtevi Prema Odluci o Izradi DUP-a i Programskom zadatku predmetni plan se donosi za period od pet godina. Ovim planskim dokumentom treba da se kroz analizu planiranih sadržaja i shodno razvojmim potrebama u okviru istog, ponude planska rešenja kojima bi se stvorili preduslovi za gradnju individualnih, stambenih i turističkih objekata (blok vile – apart hoteli sa 2 zvezdice), uklapanje bespravno izgrađenih objekata koji ispunjavaju uslove, uz prateće i komplementarne sadržaje na predmetnom području, kao i maksimalno očuvanje i uklapanje postojećeg vitalnog i funkcionalnog zelenila u nova urbanistička rešenja.
    [Show full text]