DOCSLIB.ORG

The State and Pressures of the Marine Environment in Montenegro Impressum

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The State and Pressures of the Marine Environment in Montenegro Impressum The State and Pressures of the Marine Environment in Montenegro Impressum Project coordinators: Marina MarkoviÉ, MSc, PAP/RAC. Aleš Mlakar, PhD, PNAM, Ivana StojanoviÉ, Ministry of Ecology, Spatial Planning and Urbanism Habitats: Milena BatakoviÉ, Mihailo JoviÏeviÉ Fish – pelagic: Milica MandiÉ, PhD, Institute of Marine Biology, Ana PešiÉ, PhD, Institute of Marine Biology Fish – demersal: Mirko ÒuroviÉ, PhD, Institute of Marine Biology Eutrophication and Ana MišuroviÉ, MSc contamination: Marine litter: Milica MandiÉ, PhD, Institute of Marine Biology Landscapes: Aleš Mlakar, PhD, PNAM, Nika Cigoj Sitar, PNAM Data and images: Mihailo JoviÏeviÉ; Nika Cigoj Sitar, PNAM Translator: Assia BariÉ Cover design: swim2birds.co.uk Graphic design: Ljudomat Cover photo: Montenegrin coast © Slaven Vilus The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the UNEP/MAP concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The report was prepared as part of the GEF Adriatic project, funded by the Global Environment Facility (GEF). For citation: UNEP/MAP-PAP/RAC i MEPU (2021). The State and Pressures of the Marine Environment in Montenegro. Authors (alphabetically): BatakoviÉ Milena, Cigoj Sitar Nika, ÒuroviÉ Mirko, JoviÏeviÉ Mihailo, MandiÉ Milica, MarkoviÉ Marina, MišuroviÉ Ana, Mlakar Aleš, PešiÉ Ana, StojanoviÉ Ivana. Ur: PAP/RAC – GEF Adriatic project. pp. + attachments Table of contents 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................................... 1 7. Assessment of Anthropogenic Impacts on the Trophic Status of Marine Environments .................................... 121 2. Legal and Methodological Background ............................................................................................................ 5 7.1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................... 123 2.1. International Legal Sources ........................................................................................................................................... 7 7.2. Status description ...................................................................................................................................................... 123 2.2. National Strategy for Integrated Coastal Zone Management in Montenegro ................................................................. 8 7.3. Pressure level assessment ......................................................................................................................................... 140 2.3. The Ecosystem Approach ............................................................................................................................................... 9 7.4. Recommendations ..................................................................................................................................................... 144 3. Working Methods ......................................................................................................................................... 15 8. Contaminants in the Marine Environment .................................................................................................... 147 3.1. Recording: indicators, state and pressure description ................................................................................................. 18 8.1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................... 149 3.2. Value assessment ........................................................................................................................................................ 20 8.2. Indicators ................................................................................................................................................................... 149 3.3. Impact assessment ...................................................................................................................................................... 21 8.3. Pressures ................................................................................................................................................................... 151 3.4. Recommendations ...................................................................................................................................................... 22 8.4. Contaminant concentration in sediment, biota and water ......................................................................................... 155 4. Biodiversity: Habitats .................................................................................................................................... 23 8.5. Contaminant pressure level ratings ............................................................................................................................ 164 8.6. Recommendations ..................................................................................................................................................... 170 4.1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................ 25 4.2. Indicators and state description .................................................................................................................................. 25 9. Marine Litter............................................................................................................................................... 173 4.3. Assessment ................................................................................................................................................................. 32 9.1. Intreduction ............................................................................................................................................................... 175 4.4. Impact Assessment ...................................................................................................................................................... 36 9.2. Indicators ................................................................................................................................................................... 175 4.5. Recommendations ...................................................................................................................................................... 46 9.3. Seabed litter .............................................................................................................................................................. 177 5. Biodiversity: Fish........................................................................................................................................... 51 9.4. Annual input of plastic litter from land to sea ............................................................................................................ 193 9.5. Marine Litter Pressure ............................................................................................................................................... 193 5.1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................ 53 9.6. Recommendations ..................................................................................................................................................... 196 5.2. National and regional significant commercial fish species status monitoring programme ........................................... 53 5.3. Indicators .................................................................................................................................................................... 54 10. Conclusion.................................................................................................................................................. 197 5.4. Pelagic species status .................................................................................................................................................. 58 10.1. Overall biodiversity impact ......................................................................................................................................... 199 5.5. Pelagic resource status valuation ................................................................................................................................. 67 10.2. Cumulative impact of pollution .................................................................................................................................. 202 5.6. Fishing impact on pelagic resources ............................................................................................................................ 75 10.3. Analysis of the state and pressures of the marine environment as the basis for protection, remedial and 5.7. Pelagic resource endangerment .................................................................................................................................. 77 optimization of planning solutions ............................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Case Study “Juzni Jadran“ Herceg Novi
    CASE STUDY “JUZNI JADRAN“ HERCEG NOVI I: INTRODUCTION: The case of "Juzni Jadran" refers to the privatization of a tourist and catering company in Herceg Novi, which owned valuable real estate of more than 100 thousand square meters on the most beautiful part of the Montenegrin coast, with a considerable number of buildings. The case study shows that Podgorica-based company "Carine", which appeared as a buyer of a first package of shares, for which it paid a negligible price instead of real privatization, and pushed the company "South Adriatic" into debt and liquidation, thereby taking its valuable real estate. It also shows one of the behavior patterns of privatization tycoons, who have emerged as buyers of once rich companies because of their property and abuse of official business in the economy, at the expense of the public interest and especially the interest of minority shareholders. II: “CARINE“ ENTERS “JUZNI JADRAN“: In January 2001, Podgorica-based company "Carine", owned by Cedomir Popovic, bought 30 percent of shares in the tourist and catering company "Juzni Jadran", which owned a large number of real estate in Herceg Novi, at a public auction. "Carine" bought shares of the then Pension Fund and Employment Office for the amount of DM 247,632. Popovic paid two deutsche marks per share at the special auction, although the nominal value of a share was DM 40. Namely, there were no interested parties at a public auction held in December 2011, so the Privatization Council held a special auction January next year, where the value of a share fell from 40 to two deutsche marks and where Popovic himself appeared as a buyer.
    [Show full text]
  • SPC Beche-De-Mer Information Bulletin #39 – March 2019
    ISSN 1025-4943 Issue 39 – March 2019 BECHE-DE-MER information bulletin v Inside this issue Editorial Towards producing a standard grade identification guide for bêche-de-mer in This issue of the Beche-de-mer Information Bulletin is well supplied with Solomon Islands 15 articles that address various aspects of the biology, fisheries and S. Lee et al. p. 3 aquaculture of sea cucumbers from three major oceans. An assessment of commercial sea cu- cumber populations in French Polynesia Lee and colleagues propose a procedure for writing guidelines for just after the 2012 moratorium the standard identification of beche-de-mer in Solomon Islands. S. Andréfouët et al. p. 8 Andréfouët and colleagues assess commercial sea cucumber Size at sexual maturity of the flower populations in French Polynesia and discuss several recommendations teatfish Holothuria (Microthele) sp. in the specific to the different archipelagos and islands, in the view of new Seychelles management decisions. Cahuzac and others studied the reproductive S. Cahuzac et al. p. 19 biology of Holothuria species on the Mahé and Amirantes plateaux Contribution to the knowledge of holo- in the Seychelles during the 2018 northwest monsoon season. thurian biodiversity at Reunion Island: Two previously unrecorded dendrochi- Bourjon and Quod provide a new contribution to the knowledge of rotid sea cucumbers species (Echinoder- holothurian biodiversity on La Réunion, with observations on two mata: Holothuroidea). species that are previously undescribed. Eeckhaut and colleagues P. Bourjon and J.-P. Quod p. 27 show that skin ulcerations of sea cucumbers in Madagascar are one Skin ulcerations in Holothuria scabra can symptom of different diseases induced by various abiotic or biotic be induced by various types of food agents.
    [Show full text]
  • Cape Mimoza Tourist Complex About Atlas Group
    Cape Mimoza Tourist complex About Atlas Group Atlas Group has over 30 members operating in the area of banking,​​ financial services, insurance, real estate, production, tourism, media, education, culture and sport. Our companies have offices in Montenegro, Serbia, Cyprus and Russia Atlas Group is organised as a modern management unit with a main objective to increase the value of all member companies by improving performance, investing in new projects and creating of synergy between the member companies. Atlas Group operates in line with global trends promoting sustainable development and utilization of renewable energy sources. Philanthropic activities conducted through the Atlas Group Foundation, which is a member of the Clinton Global Initiative. Atlas Bank was awarded the status of the best Bank in Montenegro, and Atlas Group as best financial group for 2009. by world economy magazine "World finance’’. In order to promote its mission Atlas Group has hosted many famous personalities from the spheres of politics, business, show business and arts. About Montenegro Located in Southeast Europe in the heart of Mediterranean. Extreme natural beauty and cultural – historical heritage (4 national parks, Old town Kotor under UNESCO protection). Area: 13.812 km2; population: 620.000; climate: continental, mediterranean and mountain; Capital city Podgorica with around 200.000 inhabitants. Borders with Croatia, BIH, Serbia, Albania and South part faces Adriatic Sea. Traffic connection: airports Podgorica, Tivat in Montenegro and airport in Dubrovnik, Croatia, port of Bar and Porto Montenegro, good connection of roads with international traffic. Currency: EUR Achieved political and economic stability – in the process of joining: EU, WTO and NATO Economy is largely oriented towards real estate and tourism development– stimulative investment climate (income tax 9%, VAT 17%, customs rate 6,6%, tax on real estate transaction 3%).
    [Show full text]
  • Foreign Citizens in Herceg Novi Municipality in 1811
    UDC: 314.7.044(497.16)”1807/1814” Историјски записи, година XC, 3-4/2017 Marija CRNIć PEJOVIć* FOREIGN CITIZENS IN HERCEG NOVI MUNICIPALITY IN 1811 ABSTRACT: At the time of the French rule in the Bay of Kotor (1807- 1814), records were kept on the foreigners residing on its territory. During this period, the civil authorities were subordinated to the military authori- ties who adopted orders on recording foreigners. The persons who did not register a foreigner immediately and offer him lodging before receiving an approval from the military authorities were subjected to a fine and military laws. On the basis of the list of foreigners from 1811, we find out that there were twenty-eight of them together with their family members residing in the Herceg Novi municipality. The majority came from Trebinje, and then from the east Adriatic coast. They arrived at the end of the 18th and the beginning of the 19th century. KEY wORDS: French administration, Trebinje, Podi, Mokrine, pro- fessions, age According to the Treaty of Tilsit (25 May 1807), the Bay of Kotor came under French control and their troops entered Herceg Novi on 29 July and remained there almost seven years – until 27 May 1814.1 At the time of the French rule, the territory of the Herceg Novi munic- ipality covered a smaller area than in the previous period, because the French administration established the Bijela municipality, for which it was not de- termined which area it encompassed, whether it was only Bijela or the sur- rounding villages as well (and which ones if so).2 * Autorka je viša arhivistkinja u penziji.
    [Show full text]
  • ADRIATIC COAST and Suppingthelocalvinoinoutdoorcafes Betweentheoleanders
    © Lonely Planet Publications 94 Adriatic Coast If coastlines could enter an equivalent of the Eurovision Song Contest, the bookies would surely back the eastern Adriatic – and not just because of Balkan block-voting either. Like the Bay of Kotor, it’s the juxtaposition of mountains and sea that sends the spirit soaring, although unlike the bay it’s a less closed-in, sunnier vibe that’s engendered here and the water’s even clearer. Croatia may hog most of the coast but Montenegro’s tiny section packs a lot into a very small area (a bit like the country itself). Without the buffer of Croatia’s islands, more of Montenegro’s shoreline has developed into sandy beaches, culminating in a 12km continu- ous stretch leading to the Albanian border. Unsurprisingly, much of the nation’s determination to reinvent itself as a tourist mecca has focused firmly on this scant 100km coastal region. In July and August it seems that the entire Serbian world and a fair chunk of its northern Orthodox brethren can be found crammed into it. Avoid those months and you’ll find a charismatic clutch of small towns and fishing villages to explore. Living on the fault line between various civilisations, the people of the coast have forti- fied their settlements since ancient times. That legacy can be explored in the lively bars and shops of Budva’s Old Town, the surreal glamour of Sveti Stefan’s village resort, the ramshackle ADRIATIC COAST residences within Ulcinj’s fortifications and, most evocatively, the lonely and mysterious ruins of Haj-Nehaj, Stari Bar and Svač.
    [Show full text]
  • ODLUKU O Određivanju Naziva Naselja, Ulica I Trgova Na Teritoriji Opštine Herceg Novi
    Na osnovu čl. 10 stav 1 Zakona o teritorijalnoj organizaciji Crne Gore ("Službeni list Crne Gore", br. 54/11, 26/12, 27/13, 62/13, 12/14, 3/16, 31/17 i 86/18), čl. 38 stav 1 tačka 2 Zakona o lokalnoj samoupravi ("Službeni list Crne Gore ", br. 2/18 i 34/19) i čl. 34 stav 1 tačka 2 Statuta Opštine Herceg Novi ("Službeni list Crne Gore – Opštinski propisi ", br. 1/19 i 37/19) na sjednici održanoj _______________________ Skupština opštine Herceg Novi, donijela je ODLUKU o određivanju naziva naselja, ulica i trgova na teritoriji Opštine Herceg Novi I. OSNOVNE ODREDBE Član 1 Ovom Odlukom određuju se nazivi naselja, ulica i trgova na teritoriji Opštine Herceg Novi. Član 2 Naselje predstavlja dio teritorije jedinice lokalne samouprave koje ima izgrađene objekte za stanovanje ili privređivanje, osnovnu komunalnu infrastrukturu i druge objekte za zadovoljavanje potreba lokalnog stanovništva, odnosno privrede. Granice naselja na teritoriji Opštine Herceg Novi određene su Odlukom o određivanju granica naselja na području Opštine Herceg Novi, ("Sl. list RCG"- opštinski propisi, br. 4/94, 9/02). Ulica predstavlja javnu saobraćajnu ili drugu površinu namijenjenu za kretanje unutar građevinskog područja grada ili naselja. Trg predstavlja otvoreni prostor okružen objektima koji se obično nalazi u središtu grada ili drugim važnijim djelovima grada. Član 3 Područje ulice obuhvata javnu saobraćajnu površinu sa pripadajućim građevinskim parcelama. Za svrstavanje ulice u pojedino naselje uzet je kriterijum početka ulice. Član 4 Položaj ulice i trga u prostoru naselja definisan je prostorno-planskom dokumentacijom za to naselje. II. NASELJA, ULICE I TRGOVI Član 5 (1) Naselje Prijevor obuhvata zaseoke: Prijevor, Malta i Konjevići.
    [Show full text]
  • Opština Br Bm Naziv Bm Upisano Andrijevica 1
    OPŠTINA BR_BM NAZIV_BM UPISANO ANDRIJEVICA 1 ANDRIJEVICA, PEOVAC 764 ANDRIJEVICA 2 BOŽIĆE 159 ANDRIJEVICA 3 SEOCE 218 ANDRIJEVICA 4 BOJOVIĆE 83 ANDRIJEVICA 5 SUĆESKA, ANDŽELATE 109 ANDRIJEVICA 6 ĐULIĆE 89 ANDRIJEVICA 7 CECUNI 46 ANDRIJEVICA 8 KUTI 28 ANDRIJEVICA 9 KOŠUTIĆE 123 ANDRIJEVICA 10 KONJUHE 80 ANDRIJEVICA 11 JOŠANICA 62 ANDRIJEVICA 12 GRAČANICA 190 ANDRIJEVICA 13 ULOTINA, GORNJE LUGE 256 ANDRIJEVICA 14 PRISOJA 257 ANDRIJEVICA 15 KRALJE 224 ANDRIJEVICA 16 SJENOŽETA 36 ANDRIJEVICA 17 OBLO BRDO, ČUKA 53 ANDRIJEVICA 18 GNJILI POTOK 85 ANDRIJEVICA 19 SLATINA 302 ANDRIJEVICA 20 ZABRĐE 210 ANDRIJEVICA 21 TREŠNJEVO 424 ANDRIJEVICA 22 TREPČA 157 ANDRIJEVICA 23 RIJEKA MARSENIĆA, NAVOTINA 237 BAR 1 DOM KULTURE "VLADIMIR POPOVIĆ ŠPANAC" - BAR 604 BAR 2 GIMNAZIJA "NIKO ROLOVIĆ" - BAR 735 BAR 3 GIMNAZIJA "NIKO ROLOVIĆ" - BAR 770 BAR 4 OŠ "BLAŽO JOKOV ORLANDIĆ" - BAR 845 BAR 5 OSNOVNA ŠKOLA "JUGOSLAVIJA" - BAR 923 BAR 6 MJESNA ZAJEDNICA BAR II-POLJE NA TABIJI 856 BAR 7 DJEČIJI VRTIĆ NA TABIJI 746 BAR 8 PREDUZEĆE RUMIJATRANS 536 BAR 9 OSNOVNA ŠKOLA "MEKSIKO" - BAR 982 BAR 10 OSNOVNA ŠKOLA "MEKSIKO" - BAR 894 BAR 11 MJESNA ZAJEDNICA "BAR V-SUTORMAN" 982 BAR 12 OSNOVNA ŠKOLA "ANTO ĐEDOVIĆ" - BAR 954 BAR 13 OSNOVNA ŠKOLA "ANTO ĐEDOVIĆ" - BAR 780 BAR 14 OSNOVNA ŠKOLA "KEKEC" - SUTOMORE 901 BAR 15 PRIBOJSKO ODMARALIŠTE - SUTOMORE 614 BAR 16 OSNOVNA ŠKOLA "MIŠIĆI" 308 BAR 17 MJESNA ZAJEDNICA "STARI BAR" 838 BAR 18 OSNOVNA ŠKOLA "SRBIJA" 359 BAR 19 PRIMORKA 368 BAR 20 OMLADINSKI DOM MIROVICA 522 BAR 21 OSNOVNA ŠKOLA ZALJEVO 824 BAR 22 OSNOVNA ŠKOLA
    [Show full text]
  • Detaljni Urbanistički Plan " PEČURICE-TURISTIČKI KOMPLEKS "
    Detaljni urbanistički plan " PEČURICE-TURISTIČKI KOMPLEKS " Naručilac plana: Opština Bar Obradjivač plana: CAU – Centar za arhitekturu i urbanizam Bulevar Džordža Vašingtona BB 81000 Podgorica odgovorni planer: Ksenija Vukmanović, dipl.inž. arh. Licenca br: 05-1125/06-2 Radni tim: Ksenija Vukmanović, dipl.inž. arh. (urbanizam) Licenca br: 05-1125/06-2 Simeun Matović, dipl. inž. građ. (saobraćaj) Licenca br: 05-1256/06 Ibrahim Bećović, dipl. inž građ. (hidrotehnička infrastruktura) Licenca br: 01-3801/2 Igor Strugar, dipl. inž. el. (elektroenergetska infrastruktura) Licenca br: 10-1503/1 Vladimir Slavić,dipl.inž el (telekomunikaciona infrastruktura) Licenca br: 10-1320/1 Sanja Lješković-Mitrović, dipl. pejz. arh. (plan ozelenjavanja) Licenca br: 01-1508/07 Tehnička obrada i koordinacija : Miroslav Vuković, inž. rač. Mladen Vuksanović, B.A. in management CAU Centar za arhitekturu i urbanizam Direktor : Predrag Babić,dipl.inž.građ. Podgorica, jul 2009. Detaljni urbanistički plan »Pečurice - turisticki kompleks«, Bar 1 SADRŽAJ TEKSTUALNOG DIJELA OPŠTA DOKUMENTACIJA Rješenje o registraciji Licenca preduzeća za izradu planske dokumentacije Licence odgovornih planera za izradu planske dokumentacije Odluka o izradi Detaljnog urbanističkog plana Pečurice – turistički kompleks Programski zadatak za izradu Detaljnog urbanističkog plana Pečurice-turistički kompleks TEKSTUALNI DIO 1. OPŠTI DIO 1.1. Pravni osnov 1.2. Povod i cilj izrade plana 1.3. Obuhvat i granice plana 2. DOKUMENTACIONA OSNOVA 2.1. Izvod iz GUP-a Bar 2.2. Izvod iz PPPPN Morsko dobro 3. ANALIZA POSTOJEĆEG STANJA 3.1. Prirodni uslovi 3.2. Stvoreni uslovi 3.3. Ocjena stanja 4. PLAN 4.1. Prostorna organizacija 4.2. Namjena površina 4.3. Pregled ostvarenih kapaciteta 4.4.
    [Show full text]
  • Strateški Plan Razvoja Opštine Ulcinj 2016 – 2020
    STRATEŠKI PLAN RAZVOJA OPŠTINE ULCINJ 2016 – 2020. Strateški plan razvoja opštine Ulcinj za period 2016-2020 2 Strateški plan razvoja opštine Ulcinj za period 2016-2020 Sadržaj Konsultativna grupa i metodološki pristup ................................................................................... 6 UVOD ...................................................................................................................................................... 8 1. Opšte geofrafske karakteristike .................................................................................................. 9 1.1. Geografski položaj .................................................................................................................... 9 1.2. Klima ............................................................................................................................................ 9 1.3. Hidrologija .................................................................................................................................. 9 1.4. Zemljište .................................................................................................................................. 11 2. Administrativna podjela, demografija, rad i usluge socijalne zaštite .............................. 12 2.1. Demografski podaci .............................................................................................................. 12 2.2 Zaposlenost i nezaposlenost ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • SPC Beche-De-Mer Information Bulletin #34 – May 2014
    38 SPC Beche-de-mer Information Bulletin #34 – May 2014 Parastichopus regalis — The main host of Carapus acus in temperate waters of the Mediterranean Sea and northeastern Atlantic Ocean Mercedes González-Wangüemert1,*, Camilla Maggi2, Sara Valente1, Jose Martínez-Garrido1 and Nuno Vasco Rodrigues3 Abstract Pearlfish, Carapus acus, live in association with several species of sea cucumbers. Its occurrence in hosts is largely dependent on host availability and its distribution from potential larval areas. The occurrence of Carapus acus in six sea cucumbers species from the Mediterranean Sea and northeastern Atlantic Ocean was assessed. The sea cucumber species Parastichopus regalis was the only host detected. Pearlfish from southeastern Spain (21 individuals) ranged in length from 7.0 cm to 21.5 cm. Two sea cucumbers from the area around Valencia harboured two adult fish each. These pairs of pearlfish, which were sampled during the summer, were able to breed inside of P. regalis, an event already noted by other authors. Pearlfish do not seem to choose their host according its size, as the correlation between fish length and host weight was not significant. Introduction Carapus acus (Brünnich, 1768) is a species recorded throughout the Mediterranean Sea and the Symbiosis, the close relationship between west coast of North Africa in depths of 1–150 m organisms of different species, can occur in (Nielsen et al. 1999). It is common in the western the marine environment and, in relation to the Mediterranean Sea, mainly around Italy, Spain and species involved, can take place in various forms, France, and also occurs in the Adriatic and Aegean such as mutualism, commensalism or parasitism seas.
    [Show full text]
  • MERİT Starlıt HOTEL & Resıdence BUDVA / Montenegro
    MERİT sTARlıT HOTEL & REsıDENCE BUDVA / MONTENEGRO MERİT sTARlıT HOTEL & REsıdENCE / BUDVA - MONteNEGRO MERİT sTARlıT HOTEL & REsıdENCE / BUDVA - MONteNEGRO INVESTMENT PRIVILEGE AT THE HEART OF BUDVA, THE PEARL OF EUROPE 4 5 MERİT sTARlıT HOTEL & REsıdENCE / BUDVA - MONteNEGRO MERİT sTARlıT HOTEL & REsıdENCE / BUDVA - MONteNEGRO “At the birth of our planet, the most beautiful encounter between the land and the sea must have happened at the coast of Montenegro. When the pearls of nature were sown, handfuls of them were cast on this soil…” Lord Byron 6 7 MERİT sTARlıT HOTEL & REsıdENCE / BUDVA - MONteNEGRO MERİT sTARlıT HOTEL & REsıdENCE / BUDVA - MONteNEGRO THE PEARL OF THE ADRIATIC: MONTENEGRO A natural paradise surrounded by the unique blue of the Adriatic Sea and the magnificent Balkan mountains, Montenegro is surrounded by Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina and Albania. Located right across Puglia, the heel of Italy, Montenegro (Crna Gora) means “Black Mountain” and it is one of Europe’s youngest countries despite its thousands of years of history. Its capital is Podgorica. As one of the six republics that made up the former Yugoslavia,Montenegro continued its existence under the roof of Serbia-Montenegro for a while after the collapse of the country. Following the referendum held in 2006, the Parliament of Montenegro declared its independence on June 3, 2006. Visa-free travel Similar to Norway, Montenegro displays some amazing fjord scenes. It is the attraction center of the Balkans with its national parks and 117 beaches, almost all of which proudly carry the Blue Flag, adorning the 293-kilometer-long coastline. Fresh air, lush forests, abundant sunshine, long beaches, clear lakes, snow-capped mountains, ancient cities as witnesses of history, and many other beauties are gathered in this small and pretty country with a surface area of 13 thousand 800 square kilometers and a population of 650 thousand people.
    [Show full text]
  • Maloprodajni Objekti Izbrisani Iz Evidencije
    Broj rješenja pod Naziv privrednog društva Sjedište Naziv maloprodajnog objekta Adresa maloprodajnog objekta Sjedište Datum do kojeg kojim je izdato privrednog maloprodajnog je važilo odobrenje društva objekta odobrenje 1-50/3/1-1 D.O.O.LEMIKO - IMPEX Ulcinj Restoran - Miško desna obala rijeke Bojane Ulcinj 14.11.2020. 1-50/4-1 D.O.O.Gitanes - export Nikšić Prodavnica Podgorički put bb - Straševina Nikšić 10.04.2016. 1-50/4/1-1 D.O.O.J.A.Z. Berane Kiosk Mojsija Zečevića bb Berane 14.04.2018. 1-50/5-1 D.O.O. Trio trade company Podgorica Kiosk - Trio 1 Vasa Raičkovića bb (objekat br.21, lok.br.21) Podgorica 10.04.2010. 1-50/5/1-1 D.O.O.Francesković Tivat Lounge bar - Restoran VOLAT Šetalište Iva Vizina br. 15 Tivat 12.03.2015. 1-50/5-2 D.O.O. Trio trade company Podgorica Kiosk - Trio 2 Vasa Raičkovića bb (objekat br.21,lok.br.21) Podgorica 10.04.2010. 1-50/6-1 D.O.O. Mamić Nikšić Prodavnica Duklo bb Nikšić 10.04.2012. 1-50/6/1-1 D.O.O.Sikkim Podgorica Restoran - kafe bar Mantra Ivana Milutinovića br. 21 Podgorica 13.03.2015. 1-50/7-1 A.D.Beamax Berane Prodavnica M.Zečevića br. 1 Berane 04.07.2011. 1-50/7/1-1 D.O.O.Rastoder company Podgorica Prodavnica Isidora Sekulića br.45 Podgorica 14.03.2015. 04-1-300/1-19 "HUGO" d.o.o. Podgorica Kafe bar HUGO Bokeška ulica br.10 Podgorica 29.05.2021.
    [Show full text]