DOCSLIB.ORG

Strategic Environmental Assesment for the Transport Development Strategy for Montenegro 2018-2035

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Strategic Environmental Assesment for the Transport Development Strategy for Montenegro 2018-2035 studio SYNTHESIS architecture&design ______________________________ STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESMENT FOR THE TRANSPORT DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY FOR MONTENEGRO 2018-2035 studio SYNTHESIS architecture&design _____________________________ I INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................................................. 5 1. SHORT OUTLINE OF THE CONTENTS AND MAIN OBJECTIVES OF THE STRATEGY AND THEIR RELATION WITH OTHER PLANS AND PROGRAMMES ........................................................................ 6 1.1. Strategy objectives ............................................................................................................................................... 6 1.2. Strategy Area .......................................................................................................................................................... 6 1.3. Transport Policy – Chapter 14 ........................................................................................................................ 8 1.4. Brief overview of the Strategy - Transport model ................................................................................... 9 1.5. Relation with other plans and programs ................................................................................................. 13 2. ENVIRONMENTAL BASELINE DESCRIPTION................................................................................................. 23 2.1. Air Quality and Climate Changes ................................................................................................................. 23 2.1.1 Air Quality ..................................................................................................................................................... 23 2.1.2 Climate and Climate Changes ................................................................................................................. 26 2.2. Geological and hydrogeological characteristics .................................................................................... 34 2.2.1. Geological characteristics ....................................................................................................................... 34 2.2.2 Tectonic unit ................................................................................................................................................. 38 2.2.3. Seismicity ...................................................................................................................................................... 40 2.2.4. Hydrogeological characteristics .......................................................................................................... 42 2.2.5. Mineral resources ...................................................................................................................................... 44 2.3. Soil and way of land use .................................................................................................................................. 49 2.3.1. Erosion ........................................................................................................................................................... 49 2.4. Waters .................................................................................................................................................................... 51 2.4.1 Fresh Waters ................................................................................................................................................ 52 2.4.2 Sea .................................................................................................................................................................... 62 2.4.3 Floods .............................................................................................................................................................. 65 2.5. Biodiversity and Protected Areas ............................................................................................................... 66 2.5.1 Biodiversity ................................................................................................................................................... 66 2.5.2 Protected areas ............................................................................................................................................ 73 2.6. Population ............................................................................................................................................................ 78 2.7. Cultural Heritage and Landscape ................................................................................................................ 78 2.8. Noise and Vibration .......................................................................................................................................... 79 2.9. Human Health ..................................................................................................................................................... 81 2.10. Economic activities ........................................................................................................................................ 82 2.10.1 Agriculture .................................................................................................................................................. 82 _______________________________________________________________________________________ Projektovanje dizajn inžinjering opremanje enterijera e-mail: [email protected] www. studiosynthesis.me 2 studio SYNTHESIS architecture&design _____________________________ 2.10.2 Forestry and Hunting ............................................................................................................................. 83 2.10.3 Tourism ........................................................................................................................................................ 87 2.10.4 Material assets – infrastructure ......................................................................................................... 90 3. IDENTIFICATION OF AREAS WITH POSSIBILITY OF BEING EXPOSED TO A SIGNIFICANT RISK AND ENVIRONMENTAL CHARACTERISTICS IN THOSE AREAS .................................................................. 93 3.1. Identified expexted results ............................................................................................................................ 93 4. EXISTING PROBLEMS REGARDING ENVIRONMENT CONNECTED WITH STRATEGY................... 97 4.1. Air pollution from Traffic ............................................................................................................................... 97 4.2. Biodiversity .......................................................................................................................................................... 98 4.3. Noise ....................................................................................................................................................................... 99 5. GENERAL AND SPECIFIC OBJESTIVES OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION .................................. 100 6. POTENTIAL SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS ON PUBLIC HEALTH AND THE ENVIRONMENT, INCLUDING FACTORS SUCH AS BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, POPULATION, FAUNA, FLORA, LAND, WATER, AIR, CLIMATIC ASPECTS, MATERIAL RESOURCES, CULTURAL HERITAGE, INCLUDING ARCHITECTURAL AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL HERITAGE, LANDSCAPE AND RELATIONS BETWEEN THESE FACTORS ........................................................................................................................................................... 106 6.1. Identification of environmental impacts ................................................................................................ 107 6.2. Soil and mineral resources .......................................................................................................................... 109 6.3. Air .......................................................................................................................................................................... 110 6.4. Climate ................................................................................................................................................................. 112 6.5. Impact on water ............................................................................................................................................... 112 6.6. Biodiversity/protected areas...................................................................................................................... 114 6.7. Human health .................................................................................................................................................... 117 6.8. Impact on noise ................................................................................................................................................ 118 6.9. Cultural heritage .............................................................................................................................................. 118 6.10. Landscape ........................................................................................................................................................ 120 6.11. Population and material assets ..............................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Case Northeastern Montenegro
    Russian Journal of Agricultural and Socio-Economic Sciences, 1(13) MOVEMENT POPULATION IN THE SECOND OF XX AND BEGINNING OF XXI CENTURY: THE CASE NORTHEASTERN MONTENEGRO Goran Rajovi ć, Jelisavka Bulatovi ć, Researchers College of Textile Design, Technology and Management, Belgrade, Serbia E-mail: [email protected] , [email protected] Phone: 0038161/19-24-850, 003861/ 3082651 ABSTRACT This paper analyzes population trends northeast of Montenegro in the second half of the twentieth and early twenty-first century. The population has increased in the period 1948- 2003 to 2.16%, but with a tendency to decline from 1981. The population in are period 1981- 2003, decreased by 14,674, or 21.16 %. Parameters of natural population indicate a negative trend. So the natural increase in 2003 in the municipality was Andrijevica - 4.6 ‰, in the municipality of Plav 4.21 ‰, and Berane 9.29 ‰, significantly lower than in the beginning of the seventies. Population migration indicates uneven density and population concentration. The existence of a large number of settlements up to 500 populations (81) is not suitable for modern flow to vital economic development of the region. KEYWORDS Northeastern Montenegro; Density of population; Natural change; Migration. Northeastern Montenegro covers an area of 1486 km² and the population census in 2003 there lived 54 658 inhabitants, or 36.8 in/ km². It covers three municipalities: Berane, Andrijevica and Plav. The paper provides a review and interpretation of the basic parameters of population trends northeastern of Montenegro in the second half of the twentieth and early twenty-first century. Unlike the nineties of the last century, the population of the region during the seventies, moving out to a much lesser extent, we can explain the material well-being of the former Yugoslavia.
    [Show full text]
  • PLAN KAPITALNIH INVESTICIJA OPŠTINE BIJELO POLJE 2019-2021.Godine -NACRT
    PLAN KAPITALNIH INVESTICIJA OPŠTINE BIJELO POLJE 2019-2021.godine -NACRT- Bijelo Polje, 2019. godine 1 SADRŽAJ STRANA 1. I POGLAVLjE UVOD 2. II POGLAVLJE REZIME 3. III POGLAVLJE 1. Analiza postoje ćeg stanja 4. IV POGLAVLJE CILJEVI RAZVOJA U PERIODU 2017-2021 GODINE (PERIOD 2019-2021) 5. SPISAK PROJEKATA ZA PLAN KAPITALNIH INVESTICIJA 2019- 2021 GODINA (DIO PROJEKATA IZ STRTEŠKOG PLANA 2017 -2021) 6. AKCIONI PLAN KAPITALNIH INVESTICIJA U 2019 GODINI PO PROGRAMU URE ĐENJA PROSTORA ZA 2019 GODINU (DIO PROJEKATA PO PROGRAMU Đ URE ENJA PROSTORA ZA 2019 GODINU) 7. LEGENDA 2 I POGLAVLjE UVOD Predlog Plana kapitalnih investicija opštine Bijelo Polje za period 2019-2021 pripreman je na osnovu Pravilnika o metodologiji za izradu Strateškog plana razvoja jedinice Lokalne samouprave koji je donijelo Ministarstvo ekonomije 11.10.2016. godine i Strateškog plana razvoja za period 2017-2021 godine i Priru čnika certifikaciju gradova i opština sa povoljnim poslovnim okruženjem u Jugoisto čnoj Evropi-EDICIJA III- BFC SEE. Prema Pravilniku Plan treba da bude struktuiran tako da sadrži uvod koji treba da pruži opšte informacije o potrebi i svrsi Strateškog plana za period za koji se donosi, informacije o očekivanim rezultatima koji će se ostvariti sprovo đenjem plana, zatim kratak prikaz (siže) Strateškog plana, opštem cilju i specifi čnim strateškim ciljevima i prioritetima i najzna čajnijim o čekivanim rezultatima radi lakšeg predstavljanja Strateškog plana, zatim analizu postoje ćeg stanja i Swot analizu, razvojne ciljeve opštine, godišnji Akcioni plan sa projekcijom i za slede ću godinu uz opis planiranih projekata, na čin pra ćenja izvršenja Plana. U pripremi ovog akta Koordinacioni tim formiran Rješenjem predsjednika Opštine Petra Smolovi ća br.01-1927 od 05.03.2019.
    [Show full text]
  • Socio Economic Analysis of Northern Montenegrin Region
    SOCIO ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF THE NORTHERN REGION OF MONTENEGRO Podgorica, June 2008. FOUNDATION F OR THE DEVELOPMENT O F NORTHERN MONTENEGRO (FORS) SOCIO -ECONOMIC ANLY S I S O F NORTHERN MONTENEGRO EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR : Veselin Šturanović STUDY REVIEWER S : Emil Kočan, Nebojsa Babovic, FORS Montenegro; Zoran Radic, CHF Montenegro IN S TITUTE F OR STRATEGIC STUDIE S AND PROGNO S E S ISSP’S AUTHOR S TEAM : mr Jadranka Kaluđerović mr Ana Krsmanović mr Gordana Radojević mr Ivana Vojinović Milica Daković Ivan Jovetic Milika Mirković Vojin Golubović Mirza Mulešković Marija Orlandić All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or distributed in any form or by any means wit- hout the prior written permission of FORS Montenegro. Published with support from the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) through the CHF International, Community Revitalization through Democratic Action – Economy (CRDA-E) program. The opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the U.S. Agency for Interna- tional Development. For more information please contact FORS Montenegro by email at [email protected] or: FORS Montenegro, Berane FORS Montenegro, Podgorica Dušana Vujoševića Vaka Đurovića 84 84300, Berane, Montenegro 81000, Podgorica, Montenegro +382 51 235 977 +382 20 310 030 SOCIO ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF THE NORTHERN REGION OF MONTENEGRO CONTENTS ABBREVIATIONS: ...............................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Detaljni Prostorni Plan Autoputa: Bar-Boljare
    DETALJNI PROSTORNI PLAN AUTOPUTA: BAR-BOLJARE Podgorica, oktobar 2008. godine Naslov dokumenta: Detaljni prostorni plan autoputa Bar – Boljare Naručilac: Ministarstvo za ekonomski razvoj Nosilac ugovora: „Montenegroinženjering“ – Podgorica Obrađivači: „Montenegroinženjering“ – Podgorica Ratimir Mugoša, dia – Koordinatar izrade „Građevinski fakultet“ – Podgorica dr Jelisava Kalezić, dia dr Miloš Knežević, dipl. ing. građ. mr Biljana Ivanović, dipl. ing. građ. „Winsoft“ – Podgorica Predrag Bulajić, dipl. ing. el. Ivana Ivanović, dipl. mat. – GIS (Baza podataka, tabele i indikatori) Saša Šljivančanin – Tehnička obrada i grafički prilozi Igor Vlahović, ing. računarstva – Tehnička obrada i grafički prilozi Saša Pejović – Tehnička obrada i grafički prilozi „Simm inženjering“ – Podgorica Simeun Matović, dipl. ing. građ. Stručni saradnici na izradi Plana: dr Vasilije Radulović, dipl. ing. geo. mr Vasilije Bušković, dipl. biolog Veselin Perović, dipl. ing. građ. Radosav Nikčević, dipl. ing. šumarstva Zoran Marković, dipl. ing. el. Danilo Vuković, dipl. ing. el. Jugoslav Žic, dipl. ing. geol. mr Dragica Mijanović, dipl. ing. geog. dr Batrić Milanović, dipl. ing. el. mr Nebojsa Kaljevic, dipl. ecc Aleksandra Jokić, dia Darko Novaković, dipl. ing. hidrogeol. Branko Micev, dipl. meteorolog _____________ Detaljni prostorni plan autoputa Bar – Boljare SADRŽAJ Uvod.............................................................................................................................................................7 Značaj i položaj infrastrukturnog
    [Show full text]
  • Z a K O N O Teritorijalnoj Organizaciji Crne Gore
    Na osnovu člana 82 stav 1 ta čka 2 i člana 91 stav 2 Ustava Crne Gore, Skupština Crne Gore 24. saziva, na drugoj śednici drugog redovnog (jesenjeg) zasijedanja u 2011. godini, dana 2. novembra 2011. godine, donijela je Z A K O N O TERITORIJALNOJ ORGANIZACIJI CRNE GORE I. OSNOVNE ODREDBE Član 1 Ovim zakonom ure đuju se teritorijalna organizacija Crne Gore, uslovi, na čin i postupak teritorijalnog organizovanja i druga pitanja od značaja za teritorijalnu organizaciju. Član 2 Teritorija opštine, Glavnog grada i Prijestonice (u daljem tekstu: jedinice lokalne samouprave) utvr đuje se ovim zakonom. Član 3 Teritorija jedinice lokalne samouprave i naziv opštine mogu se mijenjati u skladu sa ovim zakonom. II. TERITORIJALNA ORGANIZACIJA Član 4 Teritoriju jedinice lokalne samouprave čine naselja. Član 5 Teritorija Glavnog grada Podgorica, sa sjedištem u Podgorici, obuhvata Podgoricu kao naselje gradskog karaktera, naselja: Balo či, Begova Glavica, Bezjovo, Beri, Bigor, Bio če, Blizna, Bolesestra, Brežine, Bri đe, Brskut, Buronje, Crnci, Crvena Paprat, Cvilin, Ćafa, Ćepeti ći, Dajbabe, Dolovi, Doljani, Donja Gorica, Donje Strav če, Donji Kokoti, Draževina, Du čići, Duga, Đurkovi ći, Duške, Farmaci, Fundina, Goljemadi, Gornje Stravče, Gornji Kokoti, Gradac, Grbavci, Grbi Do, Kisjelica, Klopot, Kopilje, Kornet, Kosor, Krusi, Kržanja, Leki ći, Liješnje, Liješta, Lijeva Rijeka, Lopote, Lutovo, Lužnica, Medun, Milati, Mom če, Mrke, Opasanica, Orahovo, Oraovice, Orasi, Ožezi, Parci, Pelev Brijeg, Petrovi ći, Poprat, Prisoja, Progonovi ći, Ra ći, Rade
    [Show full text]
  • Inventory of Tourist Facilities and Capacities in Lake Skadar-Shkodra Area
    Inventory of tourist facilities and capacities in Lake Skadar-Shkodra area INVENTORY OF TOURIST FACILITIES AND CAPACITIES IN LAKE SKADAR-SHKODRA AREA Prepared by LAKE SKADAR-SHKODRA INTEGRATED ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT PROJECT July 2011 1 Inventory of tourist facilities and capacities in Lake Skadar-Shkodra area INTRODUCTION Lake Skadar-Shkodra is the largest lake in the Balkan Peninsula shared between Montenegro and Albania. The Montenegrin part of the lake and its surrounding area were declared a national park in 1983 and in Albania a Managed Nature Reserve. In 1996 in Montenegro and in 2006 in Albania, Skadar-Shkodra Lake was included in the Ramsar list of wetlands of international importance. Lake Skadar is a wonderful place with mirrored waters, rocky shores and wetlands full of wildlife with more than 270 species of birds, plenty of natural herbs, traditional fishing villages, numerous islet monasteries and cultural heritage sites, fascinating beaches surrounded by karst mountains, various amusing, social and cultutral events. Lake Skadar area is where some of the best wines and organic food in Montenegro can be found, cultivated by the local producers especially in Crmnica and Godinje valleys in Montenegro and Shtoj village in Albania. There are also numerous accomodation facilities, restaurants and shopping centers, on the Montenegrin and Labanian sides of the lake that make this area attractive to hiome and foreign tourists. Being a tourist attraction with all these natural and cultural resources the aim of this inventory is to prepare a joint Montenegrin and Albanian inventory on tourist facilities and capacities of Lake Shkodra area, to promote Lake Skadar-Shkodra as a joint tourist attraction internally and internationally.
    [Show full text]
  • REBIS) Update
    Report No. 100619-ECA Public Disclosure Authorized The Regional Balkans Infrastructure Study (REBIS) Update ENHANCING REGIONAL CONNECTIVITY Identifying Impediments and Priority Remedies Public Disclosure Authorized Main Report Public Disclosure Authorized September 2015 Public Disclosure Authorized © 2015 The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development 1818 H Street NW Washington DC 20433 Telephone: 202-473-1000 Internet: www.worldbank.org E-mail: [email protected] All rights reserved This document has been produced with the financial assistance of the European Western Balkans Joint Fund under the Western Balkans Investment Framework. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and can therefore in no way be taken to reflect the official opinion of the Contributors to the European Western Balkans Joint Fund or the EBRD and the EIB, as co-managers of the European Western Balkans Joint Fund. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Board of Executive Directors of The World Bank or the governments they represent. World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgment on the part of the World Bank concerning the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. Rights and Permissions The material in this publication is copyrighted. Copying and/or transmitting portions or all of this work without permission may be a violation of applicable law. The World Bank encourages dissemination of its work and will normally grant permission promptly.
    [Show full text]
  • GENS VLACHORUM in HISTORIA SERBORUMQUE SLAVORUM (Vlachs in the History of the Serbs and Slavs)
    ПЕТАР Б. БОГУНОВИЋ УДК 94(497.11) Нови Сад Оригиналан научни рад Република Србија Примљен: 21.01.2018 Одобрен: 23.02.2018 Страна: 577-600 GENS VLACHORUM IN HISTORIA SERBORUMQUE SLAVORUM (Vlachs in the History of the Serbs and Slavs) Part 1 Summary: This article deals with the issue of the term Vlach, that is, its genesis, dis- persion through history and geographical distribution. Also, the article tries to throw a little more light on this notion, through a multidisciplinary view on the part of the population that has been named Vlachs in the past or present. The goal is to create an image of what they really are, and what they have never been, through a specific chronological historical overview of data related to the Vlachs. Thus, it allows the reader to understand, through the facts presented here, the misconceptions that are related to this term in the historiographic literature. Key words: Vlachs, Morlachs, Serbs, Slavs, Wallachia, Moldavia, Romanian Orthodox Church The terms »Vlach«1, or later, »Morlach«2, does not represent the nationality, that is, they have never represented it throughout the history, because both of this terms exclusively refer to the members of Serbian nation, in the Serbian ethnic area. –––––––––––– [email protected] 1 Serbian (Cyrillic script): влах. »Now in answer to all these frivolous assertions, it is sufficient to observe, that our Morlacchi are called Vlassi, that is, noble or potent, for the same reason that the body of the nation is called Slavi, which means glorious; that the word Vlah has nothing
    [Show full text]
  • Odluka O Opštinskim I Nekategorisanim Putevima Na Teritoriji Glavnog Grada - Podgorice
    Odluka o opštinskim i nekategorisanim putevima na teritoriji Glavnog grada - Podgorice Odluka je objavljena u "Službenom listu CG - Opštinski propisi", br. 11/2009, 40/2015 i 34/2016. I OPŠTE ODREDBE Član 1 Ovom Odlukom se uređuje upravljanje, izgradnja, rekonstrukcija, održavanje, zaštita, razvoj i način korišćenja i finansiranja opštinskih i nekategorisanih puteva na teritoriji Glavnog grada - Podgorice (u daljem tekstu: Glavni grad). Član 2 Opštinski put je javni put namijenjen povezivanju naselja na teritoriji Glavnog grada, povezivanju sa naseljima u susjednim opštinama ili povezivanju djelova naselja, prirodnih i kulturnih znamenitosti, pojedinih objekata i slično na teritoriji Glavnog grada. Opštinski putevi su lokalni putevi, kao i ulice u naseljima. Opštinski putevi su putevi u opštoj upotrebi. Član 3 Nekategorisani put je površina koja se koristi za saobraćaj po bilo kom osnovu i koji je dostupan većem broju korisnika (seoski, poljski i šumski putevi, putevi na nasipima za odbranu od poplava, parkirališta i sl.). Nekategorisani putevi su u opštoj upotrebi, osim puteva koji su osnovno sredstvo privrednog društva ili drugog pravnog lica i puteva izgrađenih sredstvima građana na zemljištu u svojini građana. II ODREĐIVANjE OPŠTINSKIH I NEKATEGORISANIH PUTEVA Član 4 Prema značaju za saobraćaj i funkciji povezivanja u prostoru putevi na teritoriji Glavnog grada su kategorisani u: - opštinske puteve - lokalne puteve i ulice u naseljima i - nekategorisane puteve. Kategorizacija i način obilježavanja opštinskih puteva vrši se na osnovu mjerila za kategorizaciju koje utvrđuje Skupština Glavnog grada, posebnom odlukom. Kategorija planiranog opštinskog puta na osnovu mjerila iz prethodnog stava i propisa o uređenju prostora, određuje se planskim dokumentom Glavnog grada. Član 5 Odluku o određivanju i prekategorizaciji opštinskih i nekategorisanih puteva na teritoriji Glavnog grada donosi Skupština, shodno odluci iz člana 4 stav 2 ove odluke.
    [Show full text]
  • Tabelarni Pregled Objekata Po Zonama ZONA VI
    Tabelarni pregled objekata po zonama ZONA VI Privremeni objekti namijenjeni za trgovinu i usluge Napomena: Za sve objekte koji se nalaze u zaštićenom, potencijalno zaštićenom području kao i za objekte koji zbog svojih karakteristika (načina izgradnje, vrste, veličina/kapacitet, tehnologija i sl.) mogu da oštete ili imaju uticaj na prirodne vrijednosti zaštićenih područja, neophodno je pribaviti od Agencije za zaštitu prirode i životne sredine, dozvolu za obavljanje radnji i aktivnosti u zaštićenom području. Kiosk Maksimalna Red. Vrsta Katastarska Katastarska Vlasništvo površina Naziv ulice Napomena br. objekta Parcela Opština parcele (m²) 1 Kiosk 1566/38 Donji Kokoti Privatno 8.75 Magistralni put 2 Kiosk 116/2 Bioče Privatno 7.30 Podgorica - Kolašin 3 Kiosk 61 Lijeva Rijeka Privatno 8.00 Lijeva Rijeka 4 Kiosk 1445 Rogami Privatno 12.00 Rogami bb 5 Kiosk 96/1 Mrke Javno 12.00 naselje Bioče Potrebna saglasnost 6 Kiosk 2783 Cerovice Javno 16.00 naselje Pričelje Agencije za zaštitu prirode i živ. sredine 7 Kiosk 1431 Beri Privatno 6.25 Beri 8 Kiosk 492/4 Rogami Privatno 6.00 Smokovac 9 Kiosk 288/2 Velje Brdo Privatno 30.00 Velje Brdo Objekat za trgovinu i usluge Maksimalna Red. Vrsta Katastarska Katastarska Vlasništvo površina Naziv ulice Napomena br. objekta Parcela Opština parcele (m²) Objekat za Potrebna saglasnost 1 trgovinu i 834 Donji Kokoti Javno 43.00 Donji Kokoti Agencije za zaštitu usluge prirode i živ. sredine Objekat za Potrebna saglasnost naselje Mrke- 2 trgovinu i 96/1 Mrke Javno 90.00 Agencije za zaštitu Bioče usluge prirode i živ. sredine Objekat za Magistralni put Potrebna saglasnost 3 trgovinu i 480 Blizna Privatno 35.98 Podgorica - Agencije za zaštitu usluge Kolašin prirode i živ.
    [Show full text]
  • Medium–Term Programme
    REPUBLIC OF MONTENEGRO MINISTRY OF FINANCE REAL ESTATE ADMINISTRATION MEDIUM–TERM PROGRAMME WORKS ON SURVEY AND DESIGN OF THE REAL ESTATE CADASTRE FOR PERIOD 2008 - 2013 Zavrsen premjer- finished survey Nije premjereno- not surveyed P o d g o r i c a July, 2007. Zavrsen premjer- finished survey Planiran premjer- planned survey Nije premjereno- not surveyed Pursuant to the Article 4 paragraph 1 of the Law on State Survey and Real Estate Cadastre (“Official gazette of the RoM”, No.29/07), the Government of the Republic of Montenegro has adopted at the Session, held on 26 th July 2007 MEDIUM-TERM PROGRAMME OF WORKS ON SURVEY AND DESIGN OF REAL ESTATE CADASTRE FOR PERIOD 2008 - 2013 I GENERAL TERMS It is stipulated by the Provision of the Article 4, paragraph 1 of the Law on State Survey and Real Estate Cadastre ("Official gazette of the RoM", No. 29/07) - hereinafter referred to as the Law, that works of state survey and design and maintenance of the real estate cadastre is performed on the base of medium-term and annual work programmes. Medium-term work programme for period 1 st January 2008 to 1 st January 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the Programme) directs further development of the state survey and real estate cadastre for the Republic of Montenegro in the next five years and it determines the type and scope of works, and the scope of funds for their realisation. Funds for realisation of the Programme are provided in accordance with the Article 176 of the Law. Annual work programmes are made on the base of the Programme.
    [Show full text]
  • Old Rascia) and Old Herzegovina During Ottoman Rule
    UDC 930.85(4–12) ISSN 0350–7653 SERBIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES AND ARTS INSTITUTE FOR BALKAN STUDIES BALCANICA XLVI ANNUAL OF THE INSTITUTE FOR BALKAN STUDIES Editor-in-Chief DUŠAN T. BATAKOVIĆ Director of the Institute for Balkan Studies SASA Editorial Board JEAN-PAUL BLED (Paris), LJUBOMIR MAKSIMOVIĆ, ZORAN MILUTINOVIĆ (London), DANICA POPOVIĆ, BILJANA SIKIMIĆ, SPIRIDON SFETAS (Thessaloniki), GABRIELLA SCHUBERT (Jena), NIKOLA TASIĆ, SVETLANA M. TOLSTAJA (Moscow) BELGRADE 2015 Radenko Šćekić DOI: 10.2298/BALC1546079S Original scholarly work Žarko Leković http://www.balcanica.rs Historical Institute of Montenegro Podgorica Marijan Premović Faculty of Philosophy Nikšić Political Developments and Unrests in Stara Raška (Old Rascia) and Old Herzegovina during Ottoman Rule Abstract: During the centuries of Ottoman rule the Tara and Lim river valleys (or Potarje and Polimlje respectively), the Pešter Plateau and Old Herzegovina saw much turbulence, wars, rebellions, population migrations. This chaotic situation was combined with the arbitrary and repressive conduct of local Ottoman feudal lords. Migrations, interethnic contacts and mixing of populations as well as an intensified Islamization process caused by a number of factors greatly complicated the situation. Albanian northward penetration along the Lim and into Pešter as well as the expan- sion of the Vasojevići tribe into the Upper Lim valley added to the complexity of the ethnic and demographic picture of the region. Perpetual rebellions against the Otto- man occupation eventually led to the liberation of the Serbian Orthodox population of these areas. Keywords: Stara Raška (Old Rascia), Brda (Highlands), Old Herzegovina, Ottoman Empire, rebellions, migrations Introduction or the sake of clarity let us first define some terms used in this article.
    [Show full text]