DOCSLIB.ORG

Montenegro – Investment Prioritisation Framework Volume 1 – Main Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Montenegro – Investment Prioritisation Framework Volume 1 – Main Report Consulting Services for Public Disclosure Authorized SUPPORT TO WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT IN THE DRINA RIVER BASIN PROJECT ID NO. 1099991 MONTENEGRO– INVESTMENT PRIORITISATION FRAMEWORK Public Disclosure Authorized VOLUME 1 – MAIN REPORT Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized November 2017 Consulting Services for SUPPORT TO WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT IN THE DRINA RIVER BASIN PROJECT ID NO. 1099991 MONTENEGRO – INVESTMENT PRIORITISATION FRAMEWORK VOLUME 1 – MAIN REPORT November 2017 PROJECT NO. A038803 DOCUMENT NO. 1 VERSION C DATE OF ISSUE November 2017 PREPARED all authors and institutions as in inception report CHECKED Nadja Zeleznik, REC APPROVED Roar Selmer Solland, COWI Consulting Services for SUPPORT TO WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT IN THE DRINA RIVER BASIN PROJECT ID NO. 1099991 This document has been produced with the financial assistance of the European Western Balkans Joint Fund under the Western Balkans Investment Framework. The views expressed herein are those of authors and can therefore in no way be taken to reflect the official opinion of the Contributors to the European Western Balkans Joint Fund or the EBRD and the EIB, as co‐managers of the European Western Balkans Joint Fund. World Bank Montenegro – Investment Prioritisation Framework Support to Water Resources Management in the Drina River Basin i Table of Contents Page No Acronyms and Abbreviations ........................................................................................................................... viii Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................................... xiv 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................. xiv 2. METHODOLOGY .............................................................................................................................................. xv 3. RESULTS ......................................................................................................................................................... xix 4. FINAL PROPOSAL OF BASIN DEVELOPMENT ................................................................................................ xxi 5. RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................................................................................................... xxii 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 1-1 1.1 Background ............................................................................................................................................. 1-1 1.2 Scope of Work and TOR .......................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.3 Layout of the Report ............................................................................................................................... 1-2 1.4 Main issues of the public consultation ................................................................................................... 1-2 1.5 Summary of main issues that influence development of water resources – key drivers ...................... 1-3 2 Setting core water management development targets – key objectives .............................................. 2-1 2.1 Provision of sufficient quantity of potable water ................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 Provision of sufficient quantities of water for other economic needs ................................................... 2-3 2.3 Provision of sufficient quantities of hydroelectric energy ..................................................................... 2-3 2.4 Environmental protection ...................................................................................................................... 2-4 2.4.1 Aquatic ecosystem ................................................................................................................. 2-4 2.4.2 Water quality protection ....................................................................................................... 2-6 2.4.3 Provision of minimal environmental flow .............................................................................. 2-8 2.4.4 Alluvial and riparian ecosystems ............................................................................................ 2-9 2.4.5 Protected areas ...................................................................................................................... 2-9 2.5 Reduction of adverse impacts of floods and droughts ......................................................................... 2-10 3 Inventory of Changes for DRB development .......................................................................................... 3-1 3.1 Short term and Long term goals for DRB development ......................................................................... 3-1 3.2 Assessing Risk ......................................................................................................................................... 3-3 3.3 Financing and its influence on priorities ................................................................................................. 3-4 3.3.1 General aspects of hydropower plants financing .................................................................. 3-4 3.3.2 Possible financing development alternatives for proposed scenarios .................................. 3-4 3.3.3 Factors which affect the financing strategy ........................................................................... 3-5 3.4 Review of all documentation regarding water related investments ...................................................... 3-6 3.4.1 Biodiversity investments ........................................................................................................ 3-6 3.4.2 Protected area investments ................................................................................................... 3-7 3.4.3 Waste water investments ...................................................................................................... 3-8 World Bank Montenegro – Investment Prioritisation Framework Support to Water Resources Management in the Drina River Basin ii 3.4.4 Waste landfills investments ................................................................................................... 3-9 3.4.5 Social investments ................................................................................................................. 3-9 3.4.6 Hydropower investments .................................................................................................... 3-11 3.5 Technical and Economic Analysis ......................................................................................................... 3-11 3.5.1 Technical Analysis ................................................................................................................ 3-11 3.5.2 Economic Analysis ................................................................................................................ 3-12 3.5.3 HPP Investment Input Data .................................................................................................. 3-13 3.5.4 Operation and maintenance costs ....................................................................................... 3-13 3.5.5 Results from the Financial Analysis ...................................................................................... 3-15 3.5.6 Economic analysis methodology .......................................................................................... 3-15 3.5.7 Results of the economic analysis ......................................................................................... 3-18 3.6 Prioritisation and effect on development strategies ............................................................................ 3-19 3.7 Prepare inventory of significant changes ............................................................................................. 3-19 3.8 Hydropower Review ............................................................................................................................. 3-20 3.9 Short review of mini HPP and their influence ...................................................................................... 3-20 3.10 Recommendations for hydropower operation concessions ................................................................ 3-21 3.11 Effect of infrastructure on floods ......................................................................................................... 3-24 3.12 Analysis of Environmental and Social Impact of investments .............................................................. 3-24 3.12.1 Methodology (for environment and social criteria) ............................................................ 3-25 3.12.2 Definition of the environmental impacts ............................................................................. 3-26 3.12.3 Definition of the social impacts ........................................................................................... 3-37 3.12.4 Environmental and social impact assessment for the future investments options ............ 3-42 3.12.5 Preliminary mitigation measures ........................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Case Northeastern Montenegro
    Russian Journal of Agricultural and Socio-Economic Sciences, 1(13) MOVEMENT POPULATION IN THE SECOND OF XX AND BEGINNING OF XXI CENTURY: THE CASE NORTHEASTERN MONTENEGRO Goran Rajovi ć, Jelisavka Bulatovi ć, Researchers College of Textile Design, Technology and Management, Belgrade, Serbia E-mail: [email protected] , [email protected] Phone: 0038161/19-24-850, 003861/ 3082651 ABSTRACT This paper analyzes population trends northeast of Montenegro in the second half of the twentieth and early twenty-first century. The population has increased in the period 1948- 2003 to 2.16%, but with a tendency to decline from 1981. The population in are period 1981- 2003, decreased by 14,674, or 21.16 %. Parameters of natural population indicate a negative trend. So the natural increase in 2003 in the municipality was Andrijevica - 4.6 ‰, in the municipality of Plav 4.21 ‰, and Berane 9.29 ‰, significantly lower than in the beginning of the seventies. Population migration indicates uneven density and population concentration. The existence of a large number of settlements up to 500 populations (81) is not suitable for modern flow to vital economic development of the region. KEYWORDS Northeastern Montenegro; Density of population; Natural change; Migration. Northeastern Montenegro covers an area of 1486 km² and the population census in 2003 there lived 54 658 inhabitants, or 36.8 in/ km². It covers three municipalities: Berane, Andrijevica and Plav. The paper provides a review and interpretation of the basic parameters of population trends northeastern of Montenegro in the second half of the twentieth and early twenty-first century. Unlike the nineties of the last century, the population of the region during the seventies, moving out to a much lesser extent, we can explain the material well-being of the former Yugoslavia.
    [Show full text]
  • PLAN KAPITALNIH INVESTICIJA OPŠTINE BIJELO POLJE 2019-2021.Godine -NACRT
    PLAN KAPITALNIH INVESTICIJA OPŠTINE BIJELO POLJE 2019-2021.godine -NACRT- Bijelo Polje, 2019. godine 1 SADRŽAJ STRANA 1. I POGLAVLjE UVOD 2. II POGLAVLJE REZIME 3. III POGLAVLJE 1. Analiza postoje ćeg stanja 4. IV POGLAVLJE CILJEVI RAZVOJA U PERIODU 2017-2021 GODINE (PERIOD 2019-2021) 5. SPISAK PROJEKATA ZA PLAN KAPITALNIH INVESTICIJA 2019- 2021 GODINA (DIO PROJEKATA IZ STRTEŠKOG PLANA 2017 -2021) 6. AKCIONI PLAN KAPITALNIH INVESTICIJA U 2019 GODINI PO PROGRAMU URE ĐENJA PROSTORA ZA 2019 GODINU (DIO PROJEKATA PO PROGRAMU Đ URE ENJA PROSTORA ZA 2019 GODINU) 7. LEGENDA 2 I POGLAVLjE UVOD Predlog Plana kapitalnih investicija opštine Bijelo Polje za period 2019-2021 pripreman je na osnovu Pravilnika o metodologiji za izradu Strateškog plana razvoja jedinice Lokalne samouprave koji je donijelo Ministarstvo ekonomije 11.10.2016. godine i Strateškog plana razvoja za period 2017-2021 godine i Priru čnika certifikaciju gradova i opština sa povoljnim poslovnim okruženjem u Jugoisto čnoj Evropi-EDICIJA III- BFC SEE. Prema Pravilniku Plan treba da bude struktuiran tako da sadrži uvod koji treba da pruži opšte informacije o potrebi i svrsi Strateškog plana za period za koji se donosi, informacije o očekivanim rezultatima koji će se ostvariti sprovo đenjem plana, zatim kratak prikaz (siže) Strateškog plana, opštem cilju i specifi čnim strateškim ciljevima i prioritetima i najzna čajnijim o čekivanim rezultatima radi lakšeg predstavljanja Strateškog plana, zatim analizu postoje ćeg stanja i Swot analizu, razvojne ciljeve opštine, godišnji Akcioni plan sa projekcijom i za slede ću godinu uz opis planiranih projekata, na čin pra ćenja izvršenja Plana. U pripremi ovog akta Koordinacioni tim formiran Rješenjem predsjednika Opštine Petra Smolovi ća br.01-1927 od 05.03.2019.
    [Show full text]
  • Anel NOVO 18.06.08 Sadrzaj:Layout 1.Qxd
    Dr. Mustafa Memić GUSINJSKO-PLAVSKA KRAJINA U VRTLOGU HISTORIJE Sarajevo, 2008. IZDAVAČ: Institut za istraživanje zločina protiv čovječnosti i međunarodnog prava Univerziteta u Sarajevu ZA IZDAVAČA: prof. dr. Smail Čekić UREDNICI: dr. Safet Bandžović prof. mr. Muharem Kreso RECENZENTI: akademik Muhamed Filipović mr. Sefer Halilović LEKTOR: Sadžida Džuvić KORICE: Dževdet Nikočević DTP: Anel Ćuhara ŠTAMPARIJA: AMOS GRAF d.o.o. TIRAŽ: 500 PREDGOVOR Ovom knjigom želim objasniti neke od burnih događaja u mom rodnom kraju koji su bitno utjecali na formiranje nacionalne svijesti mojih sunarodnika i na njihov ekonomski i društveno-politički položaj poslije Drugog svjetskog rata. U narodu moga kraja duboko su urezana dva događaja. Jedan je osvajanje Gusinjsko-plavskog kraja od crnogorske vojske 1912, a drugi se odnosi na razdoblje od 1919. do 1945. Njima se objašnjava dolazak jednog puka srpske vojske, koji je poslije proboja Solunskog fronta nastupao vardarskom dolinom i od Skoplja i Kosovske Mitrovice uputio se prema Crnoj Gori. Pritom se prema Podgorici kretao preko Gusinjsko-plavske krajine, nakon čega je došlo do pobune Bošnjaka i Albanaca, te pokušaja uspostavljanja nove vlasti, a zatim do formiranja dviju vasojevićkih brigada - Donja i Gornja vasojevićka - koje su se kao paravojne jedinice pridružile srpskoj vojsci i djelovale pod rukovodstvom centralne Crnogorske uprave u Podgorici. Tom su prilikom u Plavu i Gusinju formirane i dvije vojne jedinice - dva bataljona - najprije kao komitske jedinice, koje su u početku djelovale u sastavu komitskog pokreta u Crnoj Gori. Strahovalo se da se uspostavljanjem njihove vlasti ne nametnu policijske vlasti, koje su tokom 1912-1913. počinile teške zločine (masovno strijeljanje – prema nekim podacima ubijeno je preko 8.000 Bošnjaka i Albanaca, a došlo je i do nasilnog pokrštavanja oko 12.500 ljudi).
    [Show full text]
  • Socio Economic Analysis of Northern Montenegrin Region
    SOCIO ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF THE NORTHERN REGION OF MONTENEGRO Podgorica, June 2008. FOUNDATION F OR THE DEVELOPMENT O F NORTHERN MONTENEGRO (FORS) SOCIO -ECONOMIC ANLY S I S O F NORTHERN MONTENEGRO EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR : Veselin Šturanović STUDY REVIEWER S : Emil Kočan, Nebojsa Babovic, FORS Montenegro; Zoran Radic, CHF Montenegro IN S TITUTE F OR STRATEGIC STUDIE S AND PROGNO S E S ISSP’S AUTHOR S TEAM : mr Jadranka Kaluđerović mr Ana Krsmanović mr Gordana Radojević mr Ivana Vojinović Milica Daković Ivan Jovetic Milika Mirković Vojin Golubović Mirza Mulešković Marija Orlandić All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or distributed in any form or by any means wit- hout the prior written permission of FORS Montenegro. Published with support from the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) through the CHF International, Community Revitalization through Democratic Action – Economy (CRDA-E) program. The opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the U.S. Agency for Interna- tional Development. For more information please contact FORS Montenegro by email at [email protected] or: FORS Montenegro, Berane FORS Montenegro, Podgorica Dušana Vujoševića Vaka Đurovića 84 84300, Berane, Montenegro 81000, Podgorica, Montenegro +382 51 235 977 +382 20 310 030 SOCIO ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF THE NORTHERN REGION OF MONTENEGRO CONTENTS ABBREVIATIONS: ...............................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • BR IFIC N° 2550 Index/Indice
    BR IFIC N° 2550 Index/Indice International Frequency Information Circular (Terrestrial Services) ITU - Radiocommunication Bureau Circular Internacional de Información sobre Frecuencias (Servicios Terrenales) UIT - Oficina de Radiocomunicaciones Circulaire Internationale d'Information sur les Fréquences (Services de Terre) UIT - Bureau des Radiocommunications Part 1 / Partie 1 / Parte 1 Date/Fecha: 09.08.2005 Description of Columns Description des colonnes Descripción de columnas No. Sequential number Numéro séquenciel Número sequencial BR Id. BR identification number Numéro d'identification du BR Número de identificación de la BR Adm Notifying Administration Administration notificatrice Administración notificante 1A [MHz] Assigned frequency [MHz] Fréquence assignée [MHz] Frecuencia asignada [MHz] Name of the location of Nom de l'emplacement de la Nombre del emplazamiento de 4A/5A transmitting / receiving station station d'émission / réception estación transmisora / receptora 4B/5B Geographical area Zone géographique Zona geográfica 4C/5C Geographical coordinates Coordonnées géographiques Coordenadas geográficas 6A Class of station Classe de station Clase de estación Purpose of the notification: Objet de la notification: Propósito de la notificación: Intent ADD-addition MOD-modify ADD-additioner MOD-modifier ADD-añadir MOD-modificar SUP-suppress W/D-withdraw SUP-supprimer W/D-retirer SUP-suprimir W/D-retirar No. BR Id Adm 1A [MHz] 4A/5A 4B/5B 4C/5C 6A Part Intent 1 105112284 F 0.0838 S ANDRE DE COR F 4E55'0" 45N55'0" FX 1 SUP 2 105112298
    [Show full text]
  • Lista Ponuđača (2019. Godina)
    Redni Ime i prezime Naziv ponuđača Sjedište Država broj odgovornog lica Elektroenergetski koordinacioni Vojvode Stepe 412, 1 Srbija Miroslav Vuković centar doo Beograd Beograd 2 Vekom Mont Doo Podgorica ul. 27. Marta br.46 Crna Gora Sanja Plemić 3 Žitomlin doo Nikšić Miločani doo Nikšić Crna Gora Stanojka Nikolić 4 Urbi pro doo Podgorica ul. Radosava Burića Crna Gora Dušan Džudović 5 PNP Perošević doo Bijelo Polje ul. III Sandžačka bb Crna Gora Zorica Perošević Svetlana Aksenova 6 Svetlana Aksenova Mihajlovna Polje bb Bar Crna Gora Mihajlovna 7 "AUTO RAD” doo Podgorica Bioče bb Crna Gora Meser Tehnogas AD Beograd- 8 ulica Vuka Karadžića bb Crna Gora Fabrika Nikšić 9 GLOSARIJ PODGORICA ul. Vojislavljevića 76 Crna Gora Mirjana Mijušković 10 Bombeton doo Cetinje ul. Peka Pavlovića 56 Crna Gora 11 Veletex doo Podgorica Cijevna bb Crna Gora Miloš Golubović ul. Serdara Jola Piletića 12 Hifa oil doo Podgorica Crna Gora Nemanja Mrdak br.8/6 13 Hasko Company doo Rožaje Besnik bb Crna Gora Omer Murić 14 Brojni Laz doo Rožaje Honsiće bb Crna Gora Šefkija Honsić 15 Braća Honsić doo Rožaje Honsiće bb Crna Gora Reko Honsić 16 Strmac doo Rožaje Biševo bb Crna Gora Safet Avdić 17 Fikro - Tours MNE doo Rožaje Bukovica bb Crna Gora Fikret Ibrahimović ul. Đoka Miraševića, 18 G-tech doo Podgorica Crna Gora Rade Gogić Ruska Kula M1 Entrust Datacard Corporation 1187 Park Place Shakopee 19 Amerika Xavier Coemelck SAD MN 55379 USA 20 Dazmont doo Podgorica Trg Božane Vučinić 17 Crna Gora 21 Art Gloria Marka Radovića 20 Crna Gora Savo Đonović 22 Chip Doo Podgorica Crna Gora 23 Zavod za metrologiju Kralja Nikole br.2 Crna Gora Vanja Asanović 24 Autotamaris doo tivat Kukuljina bb Crna Gora Zorica Radonjić 25 Swiss Osiguranje A.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Prijedlog Odluke O Osnivanju Biznis Zona U Opštini Bijelo Polje
    CRNA GORA KOMISIJA ZA KONTROLU DRŽAVNE POMOĆI Broj: 01 – 21/3 Podgorica, 07. maj 2018. Godine Na osnovu člana 41 Zakon o kontroli državne pomoći ("Službeni list CG", br. 12/18), a u vezi člana 10 stav 1, tačka 1 i člana 19 stav 3 Zakon o kontroli državne pomoći ("Službeni list CG" br. 74/09 i 54/11) i člana 18 stav 2 ZUP-a ("Službeni list CG", br. 56/14, 20/15, 10/16 i 37/17), Komisija za kontrolu državne pomoći, na sjednici održanoj 07. maja 2018. godine, donijela je RJEŠENJE Predlog Odluke o osnivanju biznis zona “Nedakusi”, “Cerovo”, “Vraneška dolina”, “Bistrička dolina”, “Rakonje – Ravna Rijeka” i “Ribarevine – Poda” u Opštini Bijelo Polje, ocijenjen je kao usklađen sa Zakonom o kontroli državne pomoći. OBRAZLOŽENJE Opština Bijelo Polje (Služba menadžera biznis zona) je, u cilju usklađivanja Odluke o proglašenju biznis zona “Nedakusi”, “Cerovo”, “Vraneška dolina” i “Bistrička dolina”, (“Službeni list CG” – opštinski propisi, br. 32/13 i 04/15) i Odluke o olakšicama za privredne društva i preduzetnike koji posluju u okvitu biznis zona “Nedakusi”, “Cerovo”, “Vraneška dolina” i “Bistrička dolina”, (“Službeni list CG” – opštinski propisi, br. 28/15), sa novom Uredbom o biznis zonama (“Službeni list CG”, br. 77/16 i 38/17), svojim dopisom broj 16- 3516 od 11.04.2018. godine, dostavila Komisiji za kontrolu državne pomoći (u daljem tekstu: Komisija), potpuno novi Predlog Odluke (kojom je pored navedenih biznis zona predloženo osnivanje još dvije nove biznis zone i to: “Rakonje – Ravna Rijeka” i “Ribarevine – Poda”), na ocjenu usklađenosti sa pravilima državne pomoći. Nakon dobijanja predmetnog dokumenta, Komisija je svojim dopisom 01-21/2 od 13.
    [Show full text]
  • Montenegro, Federal Republic of Yugoslavia 22 April 2001
    CG/CP (8) 5 REV Standing Committee Report on the observation of the early parliamentary elections in Montenegro, Federal Republic of Yugoslavia 22 April 2001 Rapporteur : Mr Tomas JIRSA (Czech Republic) Adopted by the Standing Committee on 31 May 2001 --------------------------- At the invitation of Mr Svetozar Marovic, President of the Montenegrin Parliament, and of the Yugoslav authorities, through their Consul General in Strasbourg, the Congress of Local and Regional Authorities of Europe (CLRAE) was invited to observe the early parliamentary elections held on 22 April 2001. The elections were called by the President of the Republic of Montenegro on 20 February, following the People's Party's withdrawal from the governing coalition and the Montenegrin Parliament's decision to dissolve itself. At its meeting of 7 March 2001, the Bureau of the Congress decided to send an observer delegation comprising Mr Tomas JIRSA (Czech Republic, L, Head of the delegation), Mrs Ayse Bahar CEBI (Turkey, L), Mr Fabio PELLEGRINI (Italy, L), Mr Constantinos TATSIS (Greece, R) and Mrs Lea TOLONEN (Finland, R), accompanied by Mr Alessandro MANCINI and Miss Sylvie AFFHOLDER (Congress Secretariat). Meanwhile, the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe had appointed six observers: Mr Andreas GROSS (Switzerland, SOC), Mrs Vera SQUARCIALUPI (Italy, SOC), Mr Lauri VAHTRE (Estonia, EPP), Mr Claude FREY (Switzerland, LDR), Mr Cevdet AKÇALI (Turkey, EGD) and Mr Pierre GOLDBERG (France, UEL), accompanied by three members of its Secretariat. The Council of Europe delegation worked closely with the election observation mission appointed by the OSCE/ODIHR and wishes to thank Mr Vulchanov, Head of the Mission, and his team for their assistance and logistical support.
    [Show full text]
  • The Case Northeastern Montenegro
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by InfinityPress Journal of Studies in Social Sciences ISSN 2201-4624 Volume 2 (2013), Number 1, 1-30 Analysis of Change in Population Structure: The Case Northeastern Montenegro Goran Rajović (Corresponding author) Street Vojvode Stepe No. 252, Beograd Jelisavka Bulatović College of Textile Design, Technology and Management, Street Starine Novaka No.20, Belgrade, Serbia Abstract: This paper analyzes changes in the demographic structure of population in northeastern Montenegro, in the example of the municipality Berane, Andrijevica and Plav. Population age structure is changing, and takes unfavorable characteristics, reduces the proportion of younger and increases the proportion of elderly population. Disturbed age structure has a reverse effect on the movement of the population (the size of reproductive contingent), but also to all other population structure (size of contingent employment, population, mandatory school contingent, relationship maintenance). Despite significant changes in the demographic structures of all northeastern Montenegro, retains the characteristics of ethnically very heterogeneous environment. Keywords: Northeastern Montenegro, population, population structure INTRODUCTION Question of the relationship between the economy and population can be approached from many sides, because of so much importance to attract the attention of many scientific disciplines. But, if the component is "population" in its demographic organic content, it is apparently possible to approach this issue as follows: from the standpoint 2 Journal of Studies in Social Sciences of economics, from the standpoint of science and interdisciplinary population - economic and demographic standpoint. Our interest here is not the first and the second approach, although of great theoretical and practical importance.
    [Show full text]
  • Small Grants Update (Montenegro), February – June 20151
    SMALL GRANTS UPDATE (MONTENEGRO), FEBRUARY – JUNE 20151 The implementation of the project activities in Montenegro is proceeding according to plan, although some delays were experienced in Bijelo Polje, where implementation could not start before the local government was cleared out of bankruptcy. Tivat local government organized an awareness raising campaign and identified premises for the new Information Center; Plav local government purchased and installed simultaneous translation equipment to be used during the municipal assembly sessions and has begun the translation of the relevant municipal documents. In addition, Kotor local government issued three magazines under the project and promotion activities are planned for the forthcoming period. JP Minority Project Secretariat has noted that in some cases (Kotor) the respective local NGOs are very much engaged in the planning and implementation of the small grants, and thus driving the process, and the respective local governments are taking a much more modest role. 1 Please note that the project implementation in all municipalities in Montenegro (except for Bijelo Polje) was delayed due to the unresolved issue of VAT eligibility. After failing in their efforts to exempt themselves from the VAT, the selected municipalities agreed to cover the VAT costs from their own funds. 1 Bijelo Polje - Local Self-Government Field: Culture Key minority engaged: Bosniaks The project aims to promote and affirm the culture and traditions of the Bosniak national minority with the active participation of civil servants and the local self-government bodies. The project will support scientific and expert meetings that deal with international and national mechanisms for the protection of national minorities and Bosniak contemporary literature.
    [Show full text]
  • Odluka O Opštinskim I Nekategorisanim Putevima Na Teritoriji Glavnog Grada - Podgorice
    Odluka o opštinskim i nekategorisanim putevima na teritoriji Glavnog grada - Podgorice Odluka je objavljena u "Službenom listu CG - Opštinski propisi", br. 11/2009, 40/2015 i 34/2016. I OPŠTE ODREDBE Član 1 Ovom Odlukom se uređuje upravljanje, izgradnja, rekonstrukcija, održavanje, zaštita, razvoj i način korišćenja i finansiranja opštinskih i nekategorisanih puteva na teritoriji Glavnog grada - Podgorice (u daljem tekstu: Glavni grad). Član 2 Opštinski put je javni put namijenjen povezivanju naselja na teritoriji Glavnog grada, povezivanju sa naseljima u susjednim opštinama ili povezivanju djelova naselja, prirodnih i kulturnih znamenitosti, pojedinih objekata i slično na teritoriji Glavnog grada. Opštinski putevi su lokalni putevi, kao i ulice u naseljima. Opštinski putevi su putevi u opštoj upotrebi. Član 3 Nekategorisani put je površina koja se koristi za saobraćaj po bilo kom osnovu i koji je dostupan većem broju korisnika (seoski, poljski i šumski putevi, putevi na nasipima za odbranu od poplava, parkirališta i sl.). Nekategorisani putevi su u opštoj upotrebi, osim puteva koji su osnovno sredstvo privrednog društva ili drugog pravnog lica i puteva izgrađenih sredstvima građana na zemljištu u svojini građana. II ODREĐIVANjE OPŠTINSKIH I NEKATEGORISANIH PUTEVA Član 4 Prema značaju za saobraćaj i funkciji povezivanja u prostoru putevi na teritoriji Glavnog grada su kategorisani u: - opštinske puteve - lokalne puteve i ulice u naseljima i - nekategorisane puteve. Kategorizacija i način obilježavanja opštinskih puteva vrši se na osnovu mjerila za kategorizaciju koje utvrđuje Skupština Glavnog grada, posebnom odlukom. Kategorija planiranog opštinskog puta na osnovu mjerila iz prethodnog stava i propisa o uređenju prostora, određuje se planskim dokumentom Glavnog grada. Član 5 Odluku o određivanju i prekategorizaciji opštinskih i nekategorisanih puteva na teritoriji Glavnog grada donosi Skupština, shodno odluci iz člana 4 stav 2 ove odluke.
    [Show full text]
  • Maloprodajni Objekti Izbrisani Iz Evidencije
    Broj rješenja pod Naziv privrednog društva Sjedište Naziv maloprodajnog objekta Adresa maloprodajnog objekta Sjedište Datum do kojeg kojim je izdato privrednog maloprodajnog je važilo odobrenje društva objekta odobrenje 1-50/3/1-1 D.O.O.LEMIKO - IMPEX Ulcinj Restoran - Miško desna obala rijeke Bojane Ulcinj 14.11.2020. 1-50/4-1 D.O.O.Gitanes - export Nikšić Prodavnica Podgorički put bb - Straševina Nikšić 10.04.2016. 1-50/4/1-1 D.O.O.J.A.Z. Berane Kiosk Mojsija Zečevića bb Berane 14.04.2018. 1-50/5-1 D.O.O. Trio trade company Podgorica Kiosk - Trio 1 Vasa Raičkovića bb (objekat br.21, lok.br.21) Podgorica 10.04.2010. 1-50/5/1-1 D.O.O.Francesković Tivat Lounge bar - Restoran VOLAT Šetalište Iva Vizina br. 15 Tivat 12.03.2015. 1-50/5-2 D.O.O. Trio trade company Podgorica Kiosk - Trio 2 Vasa Raičkovića bb (objekat br.21,lok.br.21) Podgorica 10.04.2010. 1-50/6-1 D.O.O. Mamić Nikšić Prodavnica Duklo bb Nikšić 10.04.2012. 1-50/6/1-1 D.O.O.Sikkim Podgorica Restoran - kafe bar Mantra Ivana Milutinovića br. 21 Podgorica 13.03.2015. 1-50/7-1 A.D.Beamax Berane Prodavnica M.Zečevića br. 1 Berane 04.07.2011. 1-50/7/1-1 D.O.O.Rastoder company Podgorica Prodavnica Isidora Sekulića br.45 Podgorica 14.03.2015. 04-1-300/1-19 "HUGO" d.o.o. Podgorica Kafe bar HUGO Bokeška ulica br.10 Podgorica 29.05.2021.
    [Show full text]