Sida Application
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Election Guide for Member Organisations Global Young Green Elections
ELECTION GUIDE FOR MEMBER ORGANISATIONS GLOBAL YOUNG GREEN ELECTIONS This guide is designed to answer key questions about the Global Young Green Steering Committee elections, which will be held online in Spring 2020. Summary ● When? Deadline Steering Committee candidate applications, See 23:59 CET, 23.04.2020 more information here. Registration of voters 23:59 CET, 23.04.2020 Vote 25.04.2020 - 04.05.2020 ● Where? Survey Monkey - an anonymised online voting platform. ● How? Registered representatives will be sent a link to vote. ● Who? Each Global Young Green Member Organisation has 1 vote. ● What voting system? Single Transferable Vote (voters are asked to rank candidates in order of preference and candidates are elected upon filling a quota of votes). Who votes? As stated in the GYG Organisational Principles, each Member Organisation of Global Young Greens has 1 vote. ● Please See Annex A for a full list of Member Organisations and votes. ● Please also refer to page 4 of the GYG Organisational Principles for more information on “Members”. Each Member Organisation is responsible for registering one person to vote on behalf of their organisation, this could be the Chair, International Secretary or Spokesperson, for example. How can I register to vote? Global Young Green Elections Spring 2020 Global Young Greens Oversight Committee To register one voter for your organisation please fill out the following registration survey until 23rd of April 2020, 23:59 CET: Voter registration form region Africa: https://www.surveymonkey.de/r/9RBY335 Voter registration form region Americas: https://www.surveymonkey.de/r/9S56MG5 Voter registration form region Asia-Pacific: https://www.surveymonkey.de/r/9TK9D9R Voter registration form region Europe: https://www.surveymonkey.de/r/MKKDN5S How do I vote? 1. -
GREEN YOUTH for a GLOBAL GREEN CHANGE Documentation
GREEN YOUTH FOR A GLOBAL GREEN CHANGE Documentation of the 2nd Global Young Greens Congress Berlin, 8th to 14th of August 2010 Dear readers! 3 A short history of the Global Young Greens 4 HISTORY 2nd Congress 8 programmE 9 Regional Meetings 10 Workshops 12 the perspectives of small content scale farming and the agricultural issues 16 Green New Deal – A Concept for a Global Economic Change? 17 Impressions 18 General Assembly of GYG Congress Berlin 2010 20 Summary of our Structure Reform 21 GYG in Action 22 Passed Proposals 23 Statements 25 Participants 26 Introduction of the new Steering Committee 28 Plans 32 THANK-YOU‘S 30 IMPRINT 31 2 global young greens—Congress 2010 Dear readers! We proudly present to you the documentation of the 2nd Global Young Greens Congress held in Berlin from 8th to 14th of August 2010! More than 100 participants from over 50 countries spent five days of discussing as well as exchanging opinions and experiences from their homecountries in order to get closer together and fight with “Youth Power for a Global Green Change“. Workshops, fishbowl discussions and a world café were organised as parts of the congress. The debated topics were endless – reaching from economics and gender issues to social justice, peace and conflicts and - of course - climate change. After three days of debating, two days of General Assem- bly followed. In this, new structures were adopted as well as several topical proposals to form a wider political platform. With this documentation, we are trying to show what the congress was about and what was behind. -
ESS9 Appendix A3 Political Parties Ed
APPENDIX A3 POLITICAL PARTIES, ESS9 - 2018 ed. 3.0 Austria 2 Belgium 4 Bulgaria 7 Croatia 8 Cyprus 10 Czechia 12 Denmark 14 Estonia 15 Finland 17 France 19 Germany 20 Hungary 21 Iceland 23 Ireland 25 Italy 26 Latvia 28 Lithuania 31 Montenegro 34 Netherlands 36 Norway 38 Poland 40 Portugal 44 Serbia 47 Slovakia 52 Slovenia 53 Spain 54 Sweden 57 Switzerland 58 United Kingdom 61 Version Notes, ESS9 Appendix A3 POLITICAL PARTIES ESS9 edition 3.0 (published 10.12.20): Changes from previous edition: Additional countries: Denmark, Iceland. ESS9 edition 2.0 (published 15.06.20): Changes from previous edition: Additional countries: Croatia, Latvia, Lithuania, Montenegro, Portugal, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden. Austria 1. Political parties Language used in data file: German Year of last election: 2017 Official party names, English 1. Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs (SPÖ) - Social Democratic Party of Austria - 26.9 % names/translation, and size in last 2. Österreichische Volkspartei (ÖVP) - Austrian People's Party - 31.5 % election: 3. Freiheitliche Partei Österreichs (FPÖ) - Freedom Party of Austria - 26.0 % 4. Liste Peter Pilz (PILZ) - PILZ - 4.4 % 5. Die Grünen – Die Grüne Alternative (Grüne) - The Greens – The Green Alternative - 3.8 % 6. Kommunistische Partei Österreichs (KPÖ) - Communist Party of Austria - 0.8 % 7. NEOS – Das Neue Österreich und Liberales Forum (NEOS) - NEOS – The New Austria and Liberal Forum - 5.3 % 8. G!LT - Verein zur Förderung der Offenen Demokratie (GILT) - My Vote Counts! - 1.0 % Description of political parties listed 1. The Social Democratic Party (Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs, or SPÖ) is a social above democratic/center-left political party that was founded in 1888 as the Social Democratic Worker's Party (Sozialdemokratische Arbeiterpartei, or SDAP), when Victor Adler managed to unite the various opposing factions. -
Activity Report 2020-2021
FYEG’s 2020-2021 Activity Report outlines each activity, whether statutory or educational, organised and hosted by FYEG, some- times with the support of our partners. This report covers the topics that each event was based on, in line with FYEG’s Activity Plan and aims as an organisation. EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITIES The outputs of projects and conclusions from discussion are being collected in the Green Principles for a Just Transition and our magazine Ecosprinter is publishing a printed edition on 2020 Work Plan - Not Just a Transition just transition. The Work Plan was disrupted by the COVID-19 pandemic and Online MO-MO Training moved online and to local context. In its new form, it consisted of 2 parts. In order to build the skills of Member Organisations and increase international networking and horizontal exchange During the series of webinars Just Transition Learning Labs among them, FYEG developed the concept of the MO-to-MO we introduced the concept of a just transition and explored online training. We first asked Member Organisations which the struggles the youth faces when trying to move away from skills and knowledge they need training on and which are their a carbon-intensive society. We analysed the implications this expertise and then reached out to potential trainers. transition might have on social and human rights both in rural and urban settings and what are the pre-existent problematics In April 2021, the first round of MO-to-MO online training is that have been accelerated in this time of health, social and defined: economic crisis. -
Green Visions and Democratic Constraints the Possibility and Design of Democratic Institutions for Environmental Decision-Making
Green Visions and Democratic Constraints The Possibility and Design of Democratic Institutions for Environmental Decision-making James Ka-lei Wong 11 March 2013 (Revised Edition) A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Government at the London School of Economics and Political Science 1 DECLARATION I certify that the thesis I have presented for examination for the PhD degree of the London School of Economics and Political Science is solely my own work other than where I have clearly indicated that it is the work of others. The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. Quotation from it is permitted, provided that full acknowledgement is made. This thesis may not be reproduced without the prior written consent of the author. I warrant that this authorisation does not, to the best of my belief, infringe the rights of any third party. I declare that my thesis consists of 86,540 words. I can confirm that my thesis was copy edited for conventions of language, spelling and grammar by Jean Morris and Chris Steele. James Ka-lei Wong 2 ABSTRACT This thesis addresses a recurrent question of our time – whether democracy can secure environmental sustainability – by drawing on literatures in the normative theory of democracy, social choice theory and environmental politics. I propose a basic, yet substantial organising principle, the ‘dilemma of green democracy’, which maps out the possibility of realising green outcomes under democratic constraints. Interdisciplinary ideas from neighbouring disciplines are also imported for the purpose of studying the design of good environmental-democratic institutions. The analytical framework is an integrated one, comprising formal choice theory and normative democratic theory. -
1. EGP Recommendation Letter URA Montenegro
Civic Movement URA (United Reform Action) Application for EGP Membership EGP Committee Recommendation Letter General Introduction The European Green Party (EGP) conducted a study visit in August 2019 and a fact-finding mission in early March 2020, as part of the application process of Montenegrin political party URA (United Reform Action). URA has officially applied for EGP membership in October 2019. The EGP has been in contact with URA since 2018. Since then, their party leader attended the Council in Berlin (Germany) in November 2018. After their application, a delegation was invited to the following Council in Tampere (Finland) in November 2019. In August 2019, the study visit included meetings with different structures of URA, activists from NGOs and civil society, supporting citizens movements and struggles with several cases of environmental destruction. The visit showed that URA is a well-established party, respected and in cooperation with civil society, and with a potential to grow. In March 2020, the EGP delegation to Montenegro was made up of Thomas Waitz (Co-Chair), Mar Garcia (Secretary General) and Mélanie Vogel (Member of the Committee responsible for Montenegro). This mission included meetings with the central leadership and Political and Advisory board of URA, their Youth and Women Forum, several local councillors and the local board in Budva. Other meetings were organized with EU Ambassador Orav Aivo and German Ambassador Robert Weber, NGOs Hocu da ostanem and Kor - Coalition for Sustainable Development, LGBT Forum Progress, the chief editor of Balkan Insight, and a Professor of International Environmental and Private Law at the State Law university. -
Download It From
IMD Partner in Democracy A NNUAL R EPORT 2005 The IMD – an institute of political parties for political parties The Institute for Multiparty Democracy (IMD) is an institute of political parties for political parties. Its mandate is to encourage the process of democratisation in young democracies by providing support to political parties as the core pillars of multi- party democracy. IMD works in a strictly non-partisan and inclusive manner. Through this approach, the Institute endeavours to contribute to properly functioning, sustainable pluralistic political party systems. It also supports the activities of civil society groups which play a healthy role in multi-party democracies, even though they are not part of any formal party structure. IMD was set up by seven Dutch political parties in 2000 in response to requests for support from around the world. The IMD’s founding members are the Dutch Labour Party (PvdA), Liberal Party (VVD), Christian Democratic Party (CDA), Democratic Party (D66), Green Party (GroenLinks), Christian Union (ChristenUnie) and Reformed Party (SGP). Netherlands Institute for Multiparty Democracy Korte Vijverberg 2 2513 AB The Hague The Netherlands Address per September 1, 2006: Passage 31 2511 AB The Hague The Netherlands T: +31 (0)70 311 5464 F: +31 (0)70 311 5465 E: [email protected] www.nimd.org IMD Partner in Democracy A NNUAL R EPORT 2005 Partners in Democracy Preface Without properly functioning political parties, resulted in a study for the European Parliament entitled democracies do not work well – a fact that is not yet No lasting Peace and Prosperity without Democracy & fully recognised within the international development Human Rights. -
The Social Rights Issue
01/2017 THE SOCIAL RIGHTS ISSUE 3 A Message from the Editors 4 Europe's youth needs basic income 5 Why banning emotions is perpetuating oppression 6-9 Social rights? What's that. 10-11 Why copyright matters 12-13 What happens when you send fifty young Greens to a summer camp in Serbia? 14-17 Hiding behind the facade of urban development - gentrification around Europe 18-19 Housing struggles and activism: the Spanish Case 20-21 If only I had the shape of a pyramid 22 Meet the writers 23 The European Court of Human Rights CONTENTS 24 “Go Home, You’re Wrong!” Layout Pictures: Design & Typesetting: Dušan Gligorić, Cover: Serbian Green Youth Jan Schnorrenberg, Page 2: Ecosprinter Editorial Board Logo: Gio Megrelishvili Page 3: Pola Rapatt (CC BY-SA 2.0) Page 6: Tina Rataj-Berard (CC Zero) Page 8: Leroy Skalstad (CC Zero) Printing Page 9: Omar Alnahi (CC Zero) Page 10 & 11: Eli Francis (CC Zero) onlineprinters.be Page 12 & 13: Julian Hauser Printed edition of 500 Published by: Page 16 & 17: John Towner (CC Zero) Page 18: Tama66 (CC Zero) ECOSPRINTER Proportion of non-male authors: Page 19: KarinKarin (CC Zero) Federation of Young European Greens Page 20: Julischka Stengele 31 Rue Wiertz 50% Page 22: private (various) Brussels B-1050 Backcover: Julian Hauser Belgium Licence Disclaimer Editorial Board: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 The articles reflect opinions of their individual writers, not necessarily those Morgan Henley (Editor in Chief), Jakob International License. of the Ecosprinter or the Federation of Hundsbichler, Simo Raittila, Paula Keller Young European Greens. -
08-78 ZAPISNIK Sa 142. Sjednice 40. Vlade
==================================================== ZA INTERNU UPOTREBU Broj: 08-78 Z A P I S N I K sa 142. sjednice 40. Vlade Crne Gore, koja je odrţana 21. januara 2016. godine ================================================== Podgorica, 21. januara 2016. godine Crna Gora VLADA CRNE GORE Broj: 08-78 Podgorica, 21. januara 2016. godine Z A P I S N I K sa 142. sjednice 40. Vlade Crne Gore, koja je odrţana 21. januara 2016. godine Predsjedava: Milo Đukanović, predsjednik Vlade. Prisutni su: prof. dr Igor Lukšić, Duško Marković, prof. dr Vujica Lazović i Rafet Husović, potpredsjednici Vlade; prof. dr Milica Pejanović- Đurišić, mr Zoran Paţin, Raško Konjević, dr Radoje Ţugić, dr Suad Numanović, dr Vladimir Kavarić, Branimir Gvozdenović, Ivan Brajović, prof. dr Petar Ivanović, Zorica Kovačević, Pavle Goranović, dr Sanja Vlahović, prof. dr Budimir Šegrt i Marija Vučinović, članovi Vlade i Ţarko Šturanović, generalni sekretar Vlade. Odsutan je mr Predrag Bošković, član Vlade. Pored članova Vlade, sjednici prisustvuju: Dušanka Jauković, sekretarka Sekretarijata za zakonodavstvo, Ivo Đoković, pomoćnik generalnog sekretara Vlade, Vera Mijatović, pomoćnica generalnog sekretara Vlade, Sneţana Radović, generalna direktorica Direktorata za evropske poslove Ministarstva vanjskih poslova i evropskih integracija, Slobodan Filipović, sekretar Ministarstva prosvjete, Nemanja Katnić, sekretar Ministarstva poljoprivrede i ruralnog razvoja, Tijana Stanković, savjetnica potpredsjednika Vlade za ekonomsku politiku i finansijski sistem, Radmila Raonić, šefica Kabineta ministra finansija, Rajko Kovačević, šef Kabineta predsjednika Vlade, Valentina Radulović-Šćepanović i SrĎan Spaić, savjetnici predsjednika Vlade i SrĎan Kusovac, savjetnik predsjednika Vlade – rukovodilac Sluţbe – Biroa za odnose s javnošću. 2 Za ovu sjednicu, Vlada je utvrdila sljedeći Dnevni red: 1. Predlog programa rada Vlade Crne Gore za 2016. -
IMD Jaarboek
IMD Partner in Democracy A NNUAL R EPORT 2004 This is an IMD publication. IMD publications are not a reflection of specific national or political interests. Views expressed in this publication do not necessarily represent the views of IMD´s Advisory Council or Board members. The IMD encourages dissemination of its work and will respond promptly to requests for permission for reproduction or translation, provided specific and prominent acknowledgement of IMD is given (www.nimd.org). Partner in Democracy Preface by the President of the IMD The year 2004 was the second year of IMD’s in democratically governed countries, human 2003-2006 programme Without Democracy Nobody development indicators generally outperform those Fares Well. During this year the cooperation with the in countries that are governed non-democratically. political parties in thirteen programme countries was Support for political society in general, and for further intensified as planned, while new relations political parties in particular, has long been were established in two additional countries. neglected in international cooperation. Through Supporting political parties and helping the its collaboration with political parties across the multiparty democratic system to perform better government-opposition divide _ a collaboration is the focus of the IMD’s work. The value of the based on inclusive approaches that facilitate dialogue link between the two became visible, for instance, among the political antagonists _ the IMD is in the pro-active role played by the political parties developing significant political capital for needed in Ghana, which resulted in an exemplary electoral reform processes within political parties and within process during the general elections in 2004. -
Building Political Parties
Building political parties: Reforming legal regulations and internal rules Pippa Norris Harvard University Report commissioned by International IDEA 2004 1 Contents 1. Executive summary........................................................................................................................... 3 2. The role and function of parties....................................................................................................... 3 3. Principles guiding the legal regulation of parties ........................................................................... 5 3.1. The legal regulation of nomination, campaigning, and elections .................................................................. 6 3.2 The nomination stage: party registration and ballot access ......................................................................... 8 3.3 The campaign stage: funding and media access...................................................................................... 12 3.4 The electoral system: electoral rules and party competition....................................................................... 13 3.5: Conclusions: the challenges of the legal framework ................................................................................ 17 4. Strengthening the internal life of political parties......................................................................... 20 4.1 Promoting internal democracy within political parties ............................................................................. 20 4.2 Building -
Green Party Convention 13-14 July
LEADING THE CHANGE 2019 BLACKHALL PLACE GREEN PARTY12 - 15 JULYCONVENTION 13-142019 JULY WELCOME TO STONEYBATTER! FÁILTE GO BÓTHAR NA GCLOCH! Welcome to Dublin Central! It is 1,200 years since the Vikings first stepped ashore from their longboats onto the muddy northern shores of the River Liffey; just down the road from where we’re holding our Convention. Dublin 7 has long been known for cattle-dealing and glass- making, and in recent years has become a creative hub with cultural and food businesses attracted to the area. You’ll be able to savour hand-made ice-cream from Christiano in Sorrento’s chipper, or a flat white from Love Supreme. The Lilliput Press is just around the corner off Arbour Place, and Bí Urban is an amazing studio for social creativity on Manor Street. The National Museum at Collins Barracks is nearby, as are the graves of the 1916 leaders. In 1997 I ran in the General Election here before being elected in 2002 in Dún Laoghaire. Cllr. Neasa Hourigan now represents Cabra and Glasnevin just up the road, and is our candidate for the next General Election. Cllr. Michael Pidgeon’s ward is a stone’s throw away across the river. As a councillor here for the last five years I have focussed on making the city easier to get around, tackling disadvantage, and the housing crisis. Recently the City Council has upgraded older persons’ housing at St. Bricin’s off Arbour Hill to a Passive House standard. Plans for the Liffey Cycle route are in the pipeline, as are proposals to regenerate the nearby Fruit and Vegetable Markets.