DOCSLIB.ORG

Spatial Plan Montenegro Eng Final

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Spatial Plan Montenegro Eng Final Spatial Plan of Montenegro Until 2020 SPATIAL PLAN OF MONTENEGRO UNTIL 2020 Podgorica, March 2008 1 / 220 Spatial Plan of Montenegro Until 2020 Title of the document: Spatial Plan of Montenegro Until 2020 Ordering party: Ministry of Economic Development (Contract No. 01/367/2/02, 9 th December 2007) Contractor: “Montenegroinženjering”, Podgorica Technical support: GTZ German Technical Cooperation Elaboration: ‘Montenegroinženjering’, Podgorica, Ratimir Mugoša, CEO Institute for Architecture and Urbanism of Serbia, Belgrade, Nenad Spasi ć, Ph.D., CEO Institute for Urbanism of Slovenia, Kaliopa Dimitrovska Andrews, Ph.D., CEO Core Team for Elaboration and Synthesis of the Plan: Ratimir Mugoša, Architect, Coordinator of the elaboration and main planner Ivan Stani č, udia Miodrag Vujoševi ć, Ph.D. in Economics Predrag Bulaji ć, Graduate Engineer in Electrotechnics Svetislav Popovi ć, MA in Architecture Vasilije Radulovi ć, Graduate Engineer in Geology Extended Team for Elaboration and Synthesis of the Plan: Vasilije ðurovi ć, Architect Spatial organization and development Kaliopa Dimitrovska Andrews, PhD, udia Nenad Spasi ć, Ph.D., Architect Ksenija Vukmanovi ć, Architect Dragana Čeni ć, Architect Vasilije Radulovi ć, Geology Engineer Natural Spatial Characteristics Maja Ba ćovi ć, Ph.D. in Economics Demography Vasilije Buškovi ć, MA in Biology Qualities of environment and protection of nature 2 / 220 Spatial Plan of Montenegro Until 2020 Ljubiša Kuzovi ć, Traffic Engineer Traffic- economy activity Drašenko Glavni ć, Traffic Engineer Simeun Matovi ć, Civil Construction Engineer Traffic- technical infrastructure Vukašin Radi čevi ć, Civil Construction Engineer Nenad Gaji ć, Mechanical Engineer, Ph.D. Energy Radovan Mareti ć, Hydro Engineer Water Management Veselin Perovi ć, Hydro Engineer Božidar Šiševi ć, Economist Agriculture Darko Dubak, MA in Forestry Engineering Forestry Dragoljub Markovi ć, Forestry Engineer Rade Ratkovi ć, Ph.D.in Economics Tourism Ilija Laloševi ć, Ph.D., Architect Cultural Heritage Tanja Vujovi ć, Ethnologist Sandra Manojlovi ć, Economist International Surrounding Željko Maraš, Electrotechnics Engineer Telecommunications Zoran Markovi ć, Electrotechnics Engineer Sla ñana Vujovi ć, Traffic Engineer Postal Traffic Batri ć Milanovi ć, Electrotechnics Engineer, Ph.D. Natural disasters, Hazards and Risks 3 / 220 Spatial Plan of Montenegro Until 2020 Veliša Šupi ć, Geology Engineer, MA Jadranka Mihaljevi ć, Civil Construction Engineer Dušan Pavi ćevi ć, Meteorology Engineer Climate Branka Gogi ć, Spatial Planner Spatial Planning Predrag Bulaji ć, Electrotechnics Engineer GIS ( Database, Tables and Indicators) Ivana Ivanovi ć, Mathematician Mladen Stojanovi ć, Electrotechnics Engineer Consultants: Veljko Martinovi ć, Forestry Engineer, Ph.D. Forestry Božidar Stojanovi ć, Technology Engineer, Waste Management Slavka Zekovi ć, Spatial Planner, Ph.D. Land Policy Dušan Pajovi ć, Lawyer, Ph.D. Legislation Ksenija Petovar, Sociologist, Ph.D. Demography Vladimir Depolo, Traffic Engineer, Ph.D. Traffic Vlada Stevanovi ć, Biologist, Ph.D. Environment Breda Miheli č, Art Historian, Ph.D. Cultural Monuments Richard Sendi, Ph.D., udia Housing Policy Milena Tržan, MA in Economics Urban Economy Technical elaboration and graphic addition: Saša Šljivan čanin Cartography Igor Vlahovi ć Lector: Borka Ćevriz For Montenegroinženjering Ratimir Mugoša, CEO 4 / 220 Spatial Plan of Montenegro Until 2020 Representatives of the Sector for Spatial Planning and Development, Ministry of Economic Development Budislava Ku č, Architect Vesna Rako čevi ć, Architect Ana Joveti ć, Spatial Planner Vojislavka Popovi ć, Spatial Planner Technical support- GTZ team: Stefan Draeger, Geographer, Ph.D. Sanja Lješkovi ć Mitrovi ć, MA in Landscape Architecture Aleksandra Kikovi ć, Economist Commission for Expert Appraisal of Spatial Plan of Montenegro: Radovan Baki ć, Ph.D. in Geography, President of the Commission Mihailo Buri ć, Ph.D. in Hydro Geology Božidar Mili ć, Ph.D. in Architecture Mileta Bojovi ć, Architect Ljubica Lazarevi ć, Civil Construction Engineer Branislav Glavatovi ć, Ph.D. in Geography Branko Radoji čić, Ph.D. in Geography Vuki ć Pulevi ć, Biologist, Ph.D. Radomir Milovi ć, Electrotechnics Engineer, Ph.D. Borislav Uskokovi ć, Ph.D. in Economics Milinko Pasinovi ć, Ph.D. in Geography Veselin Vukoti ć, Ph.D. in Economics Novak Jaukovi ć, Electrotechnics Engineer, Ph.D. Čedomir Markovi ć, Ph.D. in Archeology 5 / 220 Spatial Plan of Montenegro Until 2020 Ana Mišurovi ć, Specialist in Toxic Chemistry Staniša Ivanovi ć, Ph.D. in Geology Gojko Nikoli ć, Ph.D. in Geography Branislav Šo ć, Forestry Engineer Milan Boškovi ć, Civil Construction Engineer Miodrag Kalu ñerovi ć, Mining Engineer, Ph.D. Dragica Mijanovi ć, Professor of Geography and History Ratko Andrijaševi ć, MA in Electrotechnics Radosav Martinovi ć, General Vesna Radovanovi ć, Lawyer, Secretary of the Commission PROJECT SS-AE SECTORAL STUDIES - ANALYSES AND EXPERTISE FOR THE NEEDS OF THE SPATIAL PLAN OF MONTENEGRO STRUCTURE AND MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING TEAM OF THE PROJECT SS-AE PROJECT TEAM Radenko Pejovi ć, Ph.D., Team Leader Mitar Mišovi ć, Ph.D, Team Member Svetlana Kosti ć-Jovanovi ć, Team Member Tanja Perovi ć, Team Secretary MAIN PROJECT EXPERT Božidar S. Pavi ćevi ć, Professor KEY SECTOR SPECIALISTS (SS-AE) 6 / 220 Spatial Plan of Montenegro Until 2020 Mi ćko Radulovi ć, Ph.D. (SS-AE) 4.1.: Natural Characteristics Jelisava Kalezi ć, Ph.D. (SS-AE) 4.2.: Spatial Organisation and Arrangement Zlatko Buli ć, MA (SS-AE) 4.3.: Natural and Landscape Spatial Values and Protection of nature Aleksandar Ćorovi ć, Ph.D. (SS-AE) 4.4.: Water Management and Hydrotechnical Systems Petar Živkovi ć, Ph.D. (SS-AE) 4.5.: Waste Management Janko Gogi ć, Ph.D. (SS-AE) 4.6.: Economy Syntethic (SS-AE) 4.6/0 Ocjena stanja i pravci privrednog razvoja Crne Gore Ratomir Živaljevi ć, Ph.D. Sub-sectoral (SS-AE) 4.6/1.: Energy Rade Ratkovi ć, Ph.D. Sub-sectoral (SS-AE) 4.6/2.: Tourism Budimir Fušti ć, Ph.D. Sub-sectoral (SS-AE) 4.6/3.: Agriculture, Forestry, Hunting and Fishing Marija Radulovi ć, Ph.D. Sub-sectoral (SS-AE) 4.6/4.: Maritime Economy Miodrag Bulatovi ć, Ph.D. Sub-sectoral (SS-AE) 4.6/5: Mining and Indusrty Božo Mihailovi ć, Ph.D. Sub-sectoral (SS-AE) 4.6/6.: Trade, Banking, Agencies and Other Services Ljubiša Kuzovi ć, Traffic Engineer (SS-AE) 4.7.: Traff ic and Telecommunications Milica Kosti ć, Ph.D., CANU Member (SS-AE) 4.8.: Development of Social Activities Žarko Božovi ć, Ph.D. (SS-AE) 4.9.: Demographic Development of Montenegro Svetislav Popovi ć, MA (SS-AE) 4.10.: Urbanization, Settlement Development and Function of Urban Centres Ilija Laloševi ć, MA (SS-AE) 4.11.: Cultural Heritage Božidar Pavi ćevi ć, Ph.D. (SS-AE) 4.12.: Seismic Risks and Risks from Other Accidents Vukajlo Vlahovi ć, Ph.D. (SS-AE) 4.13.: Defense and Civil Protection Miroljub Kojovi ć, Ph.D. Study Basis SS-AE 7 / 220 Spatial Plan of Montenegro Until 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................... 16 0.1 Legal basis and applied procedures during the elaboration of the Spatial Plan .. 16 0.2 Character of the Spatial Plan of Montenegro ............................................................ 16 0.3 Definitions of key terms ............................................................................................... 19 A – APPRAISAL OF THE STATE OF THE SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT ................................... 21 1. APPRAISAL OF ACHIEVEMENT OF THE SPATIAL PLAN OF MONTENEGRO ...... 22 1.1 Natural values and cultural heritage .......................................................................... 22 1.2 Demographic changes and spatial and urban structures ........................................ 22 1.3 Economic development ............................................................................................... 24 1.4 Infrastructural and communal systems ..................................................................... 25 1.5 Seismic risk and risk from other accident s............................................................... 27 1.6 Anticipated and achieved development of the regions............................................ 27 2 EXPERIENCES FROM THE PLANNING PROCESS AND PREVIOUS SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT .............................................................................................. 29 2.1 System of spatial planning and spatial development on national and local level 29 2.2 State of elaboration of spatial planning documentation .......................................... 30 2.3 Land management ........................................................................................................ 31 2.4 Balance sheet of the surfaces by purpose (land use).............................................. 31 2.5. Informational (IT) base for the spatial management ................................................... 33 3. MAIN FACTORS OF SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT ......................................................... 35 3.1 Geographic position of Montenegro ......................................................................... 35 3.2 Natural conditions ........................................................................................................ 35 3.2.1 Geological basis .................................................................................................... 35 3.2.2. Mineral raw materials................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Traffic Connectivity in Croatia in the Past: the Dubrovnik Region Case
    Athens Journal of History - Volume 1, Issue 3 – Pages 195-204 Traffic Connectivity in Croatia in the Past: The Dubrovnik Region Case By Marija Benić Penava This paper analyses the development of traffic routes in the far south of Croatia during the 19th and 20th century. Poor traffic connectivity was the consequence of traffic policy which was subordinated to the interests of Vienna in the Austro- Hungarian Monarchy, and after World War I, to Belgrade. Since the Dubrovnik region was oriented towards the sea, and since traditionally it had strong entrepreneurship and sea traffic that enabled great economic prosperity of Dubrovnik in the past centuries. Ships flying the flag of Sveti Vlaho (Saint Blaise, the patron saint of the city) were present in the Mediterranean and the world’s oceans, yet the service industry which Dubrovnik provided was completed by tourism only in the Kingdom of Yugoslavia. The perception of Dubrovnik as a world tourist destination was established in the first half of the 20th century and that could only be maintained by quality traffic routes. Therefore it was extremely important for the prosperity of the far south of Croatia to have and retain the best connectivity by railway as well as sea, land and air traffic. Introduction The transition from the eighteenth to the nineteenth century was a period of great economic change in Europe. The discovery of the Watt’s steam engine (1764) enabled mechanical transport, which neither the working animals nor the natural power, on which transportation was dependent previously, could not contest. The steam engine passed the milestone in the field of transport connection.
    [Show full text]
  • Z a K O N O Teritorijalnoj Organizaciji Crne Gore
    Na osnovu člana 82 stav 1 ta čka 2 i člana 91 stav 2 Ustava Crne Gore, Skupština Crne Gore 24. saziva, na drugoj śednici drugog redovnog (jesenjeg) zasijedanja u 2011. godini, dana 2. novembra 2011. godine, donijela je Z A K O N O TERITORIJALNOJ ORGANIZACIJI CRNE GORE I. OSNOVNE ODREDBE Član 1 Ovim zakonom ure đuju se teritorijalna organizacija Crne Gore, uslovi, na čin i postupak teritorijalnog organizovanja i druga pitanja od značaja za teritorijalnu organizaciju. Član 2 Teritorija opštine, Glavnog grada i Prijestonice (u daljem tekstu: jedinice lokalne samouprave) utvr đuje se ovim zakonom. Član 3 Teritorija jedinice lokalne samouprave i naziv opštine mogu se mijenjati u skladu sa ovim zakonom. II. TERITORIJALNA ORGANIZACIJA Član 4 Teritoriju jedinice lokalne samouprave čine naselja. Član 5 Teritorija Glavnog grada Podgorica, sa sjedištem u Podgorici, obuhvata Podgoricu kao naselje gradskog karaktera, naselja: Balo či, Begova Glavica, Bezjovo, Beri, Bigor, Bio če, Blizna, Bolesestra, Brežine, Bri đe, Brskut, Buronje, Crnci, Crvena Paprat, Cvilin, Ćafa, Ćepeti ći, Dajbabe, Dolovi, Doljani, Donja Gorica, Donje Strav če, Donji Kokoti, Draževina, Du čići, Duga, Đurkovi ći, Duške, Farmaci, Fundina, Goljemadi, Gornje Stravče, Gornji Kokoti, Gradac, Grbavci, Grbi Do, Kisjelica, Klopot, Kopilje, Kornet, Kosor, Krusi, Kržanja, Leki ći, Liješnje, Liješta, Lijeva Rijeka, Lopote, Lutovo, Lužnica, Medun, Milati, Mom če, Mrke, Opasanica, Orahovo, Oraovice, Orasi, Ožezi, Parci, Pelev Brijeg, Petrovi ći, Poprat, Prisoja, Progonovi ći, Ra ći, Rade
    [Show full text]
  • REBIS) Update
    Report No. 100619-ECA Public Disclosure Authorized The Regional Balkans Infrastructure Study (REBIS) Update ENHANCING REGIONAL CONNECTIVITY Identifying Impediments and Priority Remedies Public Disclosure Authorized Main Report Public Disclosure Authorized September 2015 Public Disclosure Authorized © 2015 The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development 1818 H Street NW Washington DC 20433 Telephone: 202-473-1000 Internet: www.worldbank.org E-mail: [email protected] All rights reserved This document has been produced with the financial assistance of the European Western Balkans Joint Fund under the Western Balkans Investment Framework. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and can therefore in no way be taken to reflect the official opinion of the Contributors to the European Western Balkans Joint Fund or the EBRD and the EIB, as co-managers of the European Western Balkans Joint Fund. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Board of Executive Directors of The World Bank or the governments they represent. World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgment on the part of the World Bank concerning the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. Rights and Permissions The material in this publication is copyrighted. Copying and/or transmitting portions or all of this work without permission may be a violation of applicable law. The World Bank encourages dissemination of its work and will normally grant permission promptly.
    [Show full text]
  • Izmjene I Dopune Prostornog Plana Opštine Kotor Za Područje Vranovići - Pobrdje
    Izmjene i dopune Prostornog plana opštine Kotor za područje Vranovići - Pobrdje IZMJENE I DOPUNE PROSTORNOG PLANA OPŠTINE KOTOR ZA PODRUČJE VRANOVIĆI - POBRDJE 2008. Naručilac: SKUPŠTINA OPŠTINE KOTOR Obradjivač: MONTECEP – CENTAR ZA PLANIRANJE URBANOG RAZVOJA Kotor (Poštanski fah 76) Benovo 36 Radni tim Saša Karajović, dipl. prostorni planer (odgovorni planer) broj licence: 05-5295/05-1 (09/01/06) Zorana Milošević, dipl. ing. arhitekture broj licence: 01-1871/07 (21/03/07) Jelena Franović, dipl. ing. pejzažne arhitekture broj licence: 01-1872/07 (21/03/07) Edvard Spahija, dipl. ing. saobraćaja broj licence: 05-1355/06 (15/05/06) Svjetlana Lalić, dipl. ing. građevine broj licence: 01-10693/1 (18/01/08) Bojana Gobović, dipl. ing. građevine Predrag Vukotić, dipl. ing. elektrotehnike broj licence: 01-10683/1 (25/01/08) Zoran Beljkaš, dipl. ing. elektrotehnike broj licence: 01-6809/1 (05/10/07) Rukovodilac MonteCEP-a: Saša Karajović, dipl. prostorni planer MonteCEP - Kotor, 2008. 1 Izmjene i dopune Prostornog plana opštine Kotor za područje Vranovići - Pobrdje MonteCEP - Kotor, 2008. 2 Izmjene i dopune Prostornog plana opštine Kotor za područje Vranovići - Pobrdje SADRŽAJ ELABORATA UVODNE NAPOMENE 4 Pravni osnov Povod za izradu plana Cilj izrade Obuhvat i granica plana Postojeća planska dokumentacija Sadržaj planskog dokumenta Programski zadatak IZVOD IZ PROSTORNOG PLANA OPŠTINE KOTOR (1995.) 7 ANALIZA I OCJENA POSTOJEĆEG STANJA PROSTORNOG UREĐENJA PROGRAMSKA PROJEKCIJA EKONOMSKOG I PROSTORNOG RAZVOJA PROJEKCIJE RAZVOJA STANOVNIŠTVA RAZRADA
    [Show full text]
  • Challenges in Cross-Border Tourism Regions Rick Lagiewski
    Rochester Institute of Technology RIT Scholar Works Presentations and other scholarship Faculty & Staff choS larship 2004 Challenges in cross-border tourism regions Rick Lagiewski Damon Revelas Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.rit.edu/other Recommended Citation Lagiewski, Rick and Revelas, Damon, "Challenges in cross-border tourism regions" (2004). Accessed from https://scholarworks.rit.edu/other/551 This Conference Paper is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty & Staff choS larship at RIT Scholar Works. It has been accepted for inclusion in Presentations and other scholarship by an authorized administrator of RIT Scholar Works. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CHALLENGES IN CROSS-BORDER TOURISM REGIONS Richard “Rick” M. Lagiewski Rochester Institute of Technology Rochester, New York and Damon A. Revelas American College of Management & Technology Dubrovnik, Croatia ABSTRACT This paper examines the tourism issues related to international borders. The discussion is framed around an example of countries with strained border relations specifically Bosnia-Herzegovina, Croatia and Montenegro. The challenges associated with border trade in tourism and the barriers associated with collaboration between destinations are explored. Through a quantitative instrument administered to public and private tourism organizations specific micro challenges are identify for a border region in the Southern- Adriatic. Key Words: Bosnia-Herzegovina, Croatia, Montenegro, Borders, Tourism, Collaboration INTRODUCTION The former Yugoslavia was a multi-ethnic state in south-east Europe divided administratively between six republics: Bosnia-Herzegovina, Croatia, Macedonia, Montenegro, Serbia, and Slovenia. Yugoslavia developed as a major destination for western tourists seeking sun, sand and sea tourism in the early 1960’s.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation Report Montenegro LG
    Evaluation of the project “Strengthening mechanisms for public finance at the local level in Montenegro” Lilit V. Melikyan 10/12/2013 Contents ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ......................................................................................................................................................... 4 ABBREVIATIONS ................................................................................................................................................................... 5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................................................................... 8 1. INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................................................... 12 1.1. Background and objective of the project .............................................................................................................. 12 1.1.1. Country context: local governance and local government finance .............................................................. 12 1.1.2. Budget process ............................................................................................................................................ 14 1.1.3. The project concept ..................................................................................................................................... 14 1.2. Purpose of the evaluation ....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • USAID Economic Growth Project
    USAID Economic Growth Project BACKGROUND The USAID Economic Growth Project is a 33-month initiative designed to increase economic opportunity in northern Montenegro. Through activities in 13 northern municipalities, the Economic Growth Project is promoting private-sector development to strengthen the competitiveness of the tourism sector, increase the competitiveness of agriculture and agribusiness, and improve the business-enabling environment at the municipal level. ACTIVITIES The project provides assistance to micro, small and medium-sized enterprises, local tourist organizations, and business support service providers, as well as municipal governments to stimulate private sector growth. The project is: Strengthening the competitiveness of the tourism sector It is promoting the north as a tourist destination by supporting innovative service providers, building the region’s capacity to support tourism, assisting coordination with coastal tourism businesses, and expanding access to tourist information. Improving the viability of agriculture and agribusiness It is restoring agriculture as a viable economic activity by supporting agricultural producers and processors from the north to capitalize on market trends and generate more income. Bettering the business-enabling environment It is identifying barriers to doing business and assisting municipalities to execute plans to lower these obstacles by providing services and targeted investment. RESULTS 248 businesses have received assistance from Economic Growth Project (EGP)-supported activities. Sales of items produced by EGP-supported small businesses have increased by 15.8 percent since the project began. Linkages have been established between 111 Northern firms, as well as between Northern firms and Central and Southern firms. 26 EGP-assisted companies invested in improved technologies, 29 improved management practices, and 31 farmers, processors, and other firms adopted new technologies or management practices.
    [Show full text]
  • TRAVEL BROCHURE 2018 Self-Catering Villas & Apartments • Gulet Cruises • Self-Drive Tours Biogradska National Park CROATIA Mount Orjen
    TRAVEL BROCHURE 2018 Self-catering villas & apartments • Gulet cruises • Self-drive tours www.montenegroholidays.com Biogradska National Park CROATIA Mount Orjen Dubrovnik Airport KOTOR BAY MONTENEGRO Morinj Perast Lepatane Herceg Novi Porto Dobrota Baosici Montenegro Djenovici Muo Tivat Lovcen Rose Krasici Kotor National Park Lustica Peninsula Tivat Airport Cetinje Boka Katorska TIVAT & LUSTICA Podgorica Airport BUDVA RIVIERA Budva Sveti Stefan ALBANIA Rezevici Petrovac Lake Skadar BAR ADRIATIC SEA Bar ULCINJ Please check our website for new accommodation options, the latest prices and availability, and terms & conditions. Ulcinj 2 / CONTACT US ON +44 (0)20 7118 1002 Biogradska National Park CROATIA Mount Orjen Dubrovnik Airport Contents KOTOR BAY MONTENEGRO Morinj Perast Explore Montenegro 06 Lepatane What we do and why we love Montenegro Herceg Novi Porto Dobrota Baosici Montenegro Bay of Kotor 08 Djenovici Muo Information and things to do Tivat Lovcen Rose Krasici Kotor National Park Lustica Peninsula Southern Montenegro 10 Tivat Airport Cetinje Information and things to do Boka Katorska TIVAT & National Parks and Mountains 12 Podgorica Airport LUSTICA Information and things to do BUDVA Highlights of Montenegro 14 RIVIERA Gulet cruise informative page Budva Southern Montenegro and Albania 16 Sveti Stefan Gulet cruise informative page ALBANIA Rezevici Magical Montenegro! Croatian Island Explorer 18 Gulet cruise informative page Petrovac Lake Skadar Magical Montenegro is a picture of the Mediterranean London, and can offer flights with all low cost carriers Some of our favourite villas 20 as it once was – crystal clear waters, breath-taking from other UK airports into the region. We also offer Overview BAR Mountains, exquisitely preserved medieval Towns and competitively priced car hire so you can truly explore warm, welcoming locals.
    [Show full text]
  • Opština Br Bm Naziv Bm Upisano Andrijevica 1
    OPŠTINA BR_BM NAZIV_BM UPISANO ANDRIJEVICA 1 ANDRIJEVICA, PEOVAC 764 ANDRIJEVICA 2 BOŽIĆE 159 ANDRIJEVICA 3 SEOCE 218 ANDRIJEVICA 4 BOJOVIĆE 83 ANDRIJEVICA 5 SUĆESKA, ANDŽELATE 109 ANDRIJEVICA 6 ĐULIĆE 89 ANDRIJEVICA 7 CECUNI 46 ANDRIJEVICA 8 KUTI 28 ANDRIJEVICA 9 KOŠUTIĆE 123 ANDRIJEVICA 10 KONJUHE 80 ANDRIJEVICA 11 JOŠANICA 62 ANDRIJEVICA 12 GRAČANICA 190 ANDRIJEVICA 13 ULOTINA, GORNJE LUGE 256 ANDRIJEVICA 14 PRISOJA 257 ANDRIJEVICA 15 KRALJE 224 ANDRIJEVICA 16 SJENOŽETA 36 ANDRIJEVICA 17 OBLO BRDO, ČUKA 53 ANDRIJEVICA 18 GNJILI POTOK 85 ANDRIJEVICA 19 SLATINA 302 ANDRIJEVICA 20 ZABRĐE 210 ANDRIJEVICA 21 TREŠNJEVO 424 ANDRIJEVICA 22 TREPČA 157 ANDRIJEVICA 23 RIJEKA MARSENIĆA, NAVOTINA 237 BAR 1 DOM KULTURE "VLADIMIR POPOVIĆ ŠPANAC" - BAR 604 BAR 2 GIMNAZIJA "NIKO ROLOVIĆ" - BAR 735 BAR 3 GIMNAZIJA "NIKO ROLOVIĆ" - BAR 770 BAR 4 OŠ "BLAŽO JOKOV ORLANDIĆ" - BAR 845 BAR 5 OSNOVNA ŠKOLA "JUGOSLAVIJA" - BAR 923 BAR 6 MJESNA ZAJEDNICA BAR II-POLJE NA TABIJI 856 BAR 7 DJEČIJI VRTIĆ NA TABIJI 746 BAR 8 PREDUZEĆE RUMIJATRANS 536 BAR 9 OSNOVNA ŠKOLA "MEKSIKO" - BAR 982 BAR 10 OSNOVNA ŠKOLA "MEKSIKO" - BAR 894 BAR 11 MJESNA ZAJEDNICA "BAR V-SUTORMAN" 982 BAR 12 OSNOVNA ŠKOLA "ANTO ĐEDOVIĆ" - BAR 954 BAR 13 OSNOVNA ŠKOLA "ANTO ĐEDOVIĆ" - BAR 780 BAR 14 OSNOVNA ŠKOLA "KEKEC" - SUTOMORE 901 BAR 15 PRIBOJSKO ODMARALIŠTE - SUTOMORE 614 BAR 16 OSNOVNA ŠKOLA "MIŠIĆI" 308 BAR 17 MJESNA ZAJEDNICA "STARI BAR" 838 BAR 18 OSNOVNA ŠKOLA "SRBIJA" 359 BAR 19 PRIMORKA 368 BAR 20 OMLADINSKI DOM MIROVICA 522 BAR 21 OSNOVNA ŠKOLA ZALJEVO 824 BAR 22 OSNOVNA ŠKOLA
    [Show full text]
  • Towards an Integrated Marine Good Environmental Status (GES)
    Towards an Integrated Marine Good Environmental Status (GES) Assessment for Montenegro Assessment of the MarineLogos Environment en anglais, avec versions courtes des and the Sustainabilitylogos ONU Environnem ent et PAM of Ecosystem Values La version longue des logos ONU Environnem ent et PAM doit être utilisée dans les docum ents ou juridiques. L a v ersion cour te des logos est destin e tous les produits de com m unication tourn s vers le public. Compiled and edited: Ana Štrbenac (lead) Marina Marković, Carlos Guitart, Anis Zarrouk, Ivan Sekovski Authors: EO1 and EO2: Ana Štrbenac – lead author Vesna Mačić, Slavica Petović; Mirko Đurović, Dragana Drakulović, Branka Pestorić, Darko Saveljić, Ivana Stojanović, Milena Bataković, Anis Zarrouk EO5: Robert Precali – lead author Danijela Šuković EO7: Branka Grbec EO8: Željka Čurović EO9: Carlos Guitart – lead author Danijela Šuković, Aleksandra Ivanović, Darinka Joksimović, Ivana Stojanović, Ivan Sekovski, Marina Marković EO10: Milica Mandić – lead expert Editing: Cover design: swim2birds.co.uk Graphic design: Old School S.P. Proofreading: N. Yonow Cover photograph: Ghost nets in Montenegro; M. Mandić The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. This study was prepared by PAP/RAC, SPA/RAC, UNEP/MAP, and the Ministry of Ecology, Spatial Planning and Urbanism of Montenegro within the GEF Adriatic Project and supported by the Global Environment Facility (GEF).
    [Show full text]
  • C U R R I C U L U M V I T
    NEURON CONSULT ZT 1. Publications 1) Kolic D., Popovic V. et al.: "EXAMPLES OF BRIDGE DURABILITY IN CETINSKA KRAJINA", Symposium "Durability of Structures", Brijuni, 6.-9.11.1985, pp.395-401 (in croatian) 2) Kolic D., Renar B.: "PROGRAM FOR STANDARD PREFABRICATED BRIDGE GIRDER DESIGN", Gradevinar (1986), Vol.38, br.11, pp.441-443 (in croatian) 3) Kolic D.: "INFLUENCE OF A SOIL-STRUCTURE INTERACTION TO A SKEW BRIDGE INTERNAL FORCES", Symposium SDGKJ, Dubrovnik 25.-27.04.1989, pp.292-297 (in croatian) 4) Renar B., Kolic D.: "SKEW DECK ANALYSIS USING FE-METHOD", Symposium SDGKJ, Dubrovnik 25.-27.04.1989, pp.361-366 (in croatian) 5) Kolic D.: "AN ITERATIVE PROCEDURE FOR SOIL-STRUCTURE INTERACTION CALCULATION", Gradevinar (1989), Vol.41, No.5, pp.227-234 (in Kroatien) 6) Kolic D.:"MODULAR DESIGN - STEPS TO CAD AND EXPERT SYSTEMS", Symposium "Traffic and Structural Aspects of Adriatic Highway", Dubrovnik 13.-15.11.1989., pp.279-286 (in croatian) 7) Renar B., Kolic D. : "MODULAR APPROACH TO A BRIDGE DESIGN", Symposium "Traffic and Structural Aspects of Adriatic Highway", Dubrovnik 13.-15.11.1989., pp.355-360 (in croatian) 8) Kolic D.: "FROM BriDes TO BriDES", 2nd Inter.Conference on CAD and Analysis of Concrete Structures "Sci-C", Zell am See 4.- 6.04.1990, pp.467-477 9) Kolic D.: "NEURAL NETWORKS IN BRIDGE DESIGN", Symposium CADForum'90, Zagreb ,10.-11.10.1990. 10) Storga S., Srsek O., Kolic D., Srsek D.: "NUMERICAL ANALYSIS OF MASLENICA BRIDGE", 3rd Congress DHGK, Brijuni 29.-31.10.1990., pp.371-376 (in croatian) 11) Kolic D., Loncarec Z., Renar B., Srsek D., Bolt D., Uhlir Z.: "SHALLOW SUPERSTRUCTURE ANALYSIS OF HIGHWAY BRIDGES", 3rd Congress DHGK, Brijuni 29.-31.10.1990., pp.285-290 (in croatian) 12) Kolic D., Zagar Z.
    [Show full text]
  • Modern Serbian, Montenegrin and Croatian Historiography on the Ottoman Empire
    Türkiye Araştırmaları Literatür Dergisi, Cilt 8, Sayı 15, 2010, 697-714 Modern Serbian, Montenegrin and Croatian Historiography on the Ottoman Empire Ema MILJKOVIC* ALTHOUGH the first important studies dedicated to South-Slav history under the Ottoman rule and based on primary Ottoman sources were written before World War Two (some of them still being valid),1 the science of historiography in the former Yugoslavia began with serious research in this subject during 1950s. At that time, there were several centers for Ottoman studies, in Belgrade, Sarajevo and to a lesser extent, in Skopje. Podgorica and Zagreb have only developed interest in this field recently, as will be elaborated in this paper. A) Modern Serbian Historiography on the Ottoman Empire In spite of the fact that both Sarajevo and Belgrade were home to some very distinguished scholars in Ottoman history, and both cities had very influential Oriental studies programs at the university level, Sarajevo took the leading role as the primary academic center for Ottoman studies, which was due to a large part that the Institute of Oriental Studies (which has its own journal called Contributions for the Oriental Philology/Prilozi za orijentalnu filologiju) was located there. Belgrade had no such Institute or specialized center; within the Historical Institute of the Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts there was a special research unit, the members of which were experts on the Ottoman language and history.2 These experts * Prof., Ph. D., Faculty of Philosophy, Niš, Serbia 1 See works of Gliša Elezović and Fehim Barjaktarević. For more details on their life and work, as well as complete bibliographies: Ljiljana Čolić, Orijentalističko delo Gliše Elezovića (Gliša Elezović’s oriental studies), (Beograd: Filološki fakultet, 1996); Andjelka Mitrović, Naučno delo Fehima Barjaktarevića (Sci- entific work of Fehim Barjaktarević), (Beograd: Filološki fakultet, 1996).
    [Show full text]