DOCSLIB.ORG

Towards an Integrated Marine Good Environmental Status (GES)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Towards an Integrated Marine Good Environmental Status (GES) Towards an Integrated Marine Good Environmental Status (GES) Assessment for Montenegro Assessment of the MarineLogos Environment en anglais, avec versions courtes des and the Sustainabilitylogos ONU Environnem ent et PAM of Ecosystem Values La version longue des logos ONU Environnem ent et PAM doit être utilisée dans les docum ents ou juridiques. L a v ersion cour te des logos est destin e tous les produits de com m unication tourn s vers le public. Compiled and edited: Ana Štrbenac (lead) Marina Marković, Carlos Guitart, Anis Zarrouk, Ivan Sekovski Authors: EO1 and EO2: Ana Štrbenac – lead author Vesna Mačić, Slavica Petović; Mirko Đurović, Dragana Drakulović, Branka Pestorić, Darko Saveljić, Ivana Stojanović, Milena Bataković, Anis Zarrouk EO5: Robert Precali – lead author Danijela Šuković EO7: Branka Grbec EO8: Željka Čurović EO9: Carlos Guitart – lead author Danijela Šuković, Aleksandra Ivanović, Darinka Joksimović, Ivana Stojanović, Ivan Sekovski, Marina Marković EO10: Milica Mandić – lead expert Editing: Cover design: swim2birds.co.uk Graphic design: Old School S.P. Proofreading: N. Yonow Cover photograph: Ghost nets in Montenegro; M. Mandić The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. This study was prepared by PAP/RAC, SPA/RAC, UNEP/MAP, and the Ministry of Ecology, Spatial Planning and Urbanism of Montenegro within the GEF Adriatic Project and supported by the Global Environment Facility (GEF). Document citation: UNEP/MAP-PAP/RAC-SPA/RAC and MESPU (2021). Towards an Integrated Marine Good Environmental Status (GES) Assessment for Montenegro. Assessment of the marine environment and the sustainability of the ecosystem values. By (alphabet order): Željka Čurović, Dragana Drakulović, Mirko Đurović, Carlos Guitart, Aleksandra Ivanović, Christos Ioakemidis, Darinka Joksimović, Vesna Mačić, Milica Mandić, Marina Marković, Branka Pestorić, Slavica Petović, Robert Precali, Darko Saveljić, Ivana Stojanović, Ivan Sekovski, Ana Štrbenac, Danijela Šuković, Anis Zarrouk. Eds: PAP/RAC, GEF Adriatic project. pp 110 + Annex Assessment of the Marine Environment and the Sustainability of Ecosystem Values – Montenegro Table of contents Foreword ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Summary ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 2 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................................... 4 1.1 GES assessment policy context ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Mediterranean Sea level .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 4 European level ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 7 The Adriatic Sea ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 8 1.2 Approach to integrated GES assessment preparation .................................................................................................................................................................................... 9 2 Socio-economic drivers, pressures, and impacts existing in the marine and coastal environment of Montenegro ................................. 10 2.1 Socio-economic drivers relevant for the state of the marine environment in Montenegro .......................................................................................................................... 10 2.2 Pressures and impacts in the marine and coastal environment ................................................................................................................................................................... 13 3 Towards an integrated GES assessment ........................................................................................................................................ 18 3.1 Overview of GES assessment ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 18 3.1.a Biodiversity – (EO1) .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 19 GES criteria and definitions ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 19 EO1 GES assessment ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 26 3.1.b Non-indigenous species (NIS) – EO2 .......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 41 GES criteria and definitions ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 41 EO2 GES assessment ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 42 3.1.c Hydrography – EO7 ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 44 GES criteria and definitions ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 45 EO7 GES assessment ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 45 3.1.d Coastal ecosystems and landscapes – EO8 ................................................................................................................................................................................................. 48 GES criteria and definitions ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 49 EO8 GES assessment ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 50 3.1.e Pollution – EO9 ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 54 GES criteria and definitions ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 54 EO9 GES assessment ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 55 3.1.f Marine litter – EO10 ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 61 GES criteria and
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Municipal Assembly, Budget, General Information, Public Procurement, Public Discussions and Public Competitions
    1 TRANSPARENCY INDEX OF MONTENEGRIN MUNICIPALITIES Podgorica, 2020 TRANSPARENCY INDEX OF MONTENEGRIN MUNICIPALITIES Publisher: Centar za građansko obrazovanje (CGO) Editor: Daliborka Uljarević Lead author: Mira Popović Co-authors: Maja Marinović Ana Nenezić Research Associate: Vasilije Radulović Design and Production: Centar za građansko obrazovanje (CGO) Print: 170 primjeraka The report is part of the project “Let’s put corruption in the museum!” implemented by the Centre for Civic Education (CCE) in partnership with NGO Centre for Monitoring and Research (CeMI), NGO Bonum from Pljevlja, NGO UL-Info from Ulcinj and NGO Za Druga from Petrovac, in cooperation with the Ministry of Public Administration and the Agency for Prevention Corruption (APC), funded by the European Union with co-financing from the Ministry of Public Administration. The content of this publication is the sole responsibility of the CCE and CEMI and in no manner can it be interpreted as an official position of the European Union or the Ministry of Public Administration. SADRŽAJ Introduction 6 Methodology 7 General assessment of the state of transparency of municipalities in Montenegro 11 How transparent are Montenegrin municipalities? 16 • Andrijevica 17 • Bar 20 • Berane 23 • Bijelo Polje 26 • Budva 29 • Cetinje 32 • Danilovgrad 35 • Golubovci 38 • Gusinje 41 • Herceg Novi 44 • Kolašin 47 • Kotor 50 • Mojkovac 53 • Nikšić 56 • Petnjica 59 • Plav 62 • Pljevlja 65 • Plužine 68 • Podgorica 71 • Rožaje 74 • Šavnik 77 • Tivat 80 • Tuzi 83 • Ulcinj 86 • Žabljak 89 Research 92 Final remarks 101 6 INTRODUCTION Fight against corruption requires a multidisciplinary, continuous and multifaceted approach, and one of the preconditions is a high degree of transparency in the work of public sector bodies.
    [Show full text]
  • BAR-Cazim Nikesic
    REPUBLIC OF MONTENEGRO OPŠTINA BAR MUNICIPALITY OF BAR Created by Ćazim Nikezić 1 OPŠTINA BAR MUNICIPALITY OF BAR Where we are BAR Bar is situated in the south-eastern part of Montenegro at the latitude 42 degrees north and at the longitude 19 degrees east. Bar is only 55 km far from the Montenegrin capital Podgorica and is at the distance of 45 km from the international airport Podgorica and 60 km fro the international airport Tivat. Bar is the connection between Montenegro and the world. Created by Ćazim Nikezić 2 OPŠTINA BAR MUNICIPALITY OF BAR SITE MAP Created by Ćazim Nikezić 3 OPŠTINA BAR MUNICIPALITY OF BAR POPULATION Bar’s municipality has got 83 settlements and 47.768 inhabitants. It is devided into 12 local communities. Bar is famous for its multi-nationalities. Its wealth consists of 25 nationalities which are settled in this area. The number of inhabitants increased from 1948 to 2003. more than 100% - from 21.000 to 47.768 in 2003. There are 11.584 young people and 4.619 penssioners. There are 3.920 unemployees. Created by Ćazim Nikezić 4 OPŠTINA BAR MUNICIPALITY OF BAR TRANSPORT NETWORK Road traffic: - Bar-Podgorica-Beograd /East Europe - Bar-Dubrovnik-West-Nord Europe - Bar-Shkoder-Tirana-South Europe Railroad system - all European directions - Bar-Podgorica-Beograd /East Europe Maritime transport -Bar- biggest Montenegrin port -Ferries: Bar –Bar, Bar-Ancona Air traffic – Airport of Podgorica -45 km – Airport of Tivat -60 km Created by Ćazim Nikezić 5 OPŠTINA BAR MUNICIPALITY OF BAR TOURISM Bar represents modern city that each day is expanding.
    [Show full text]
  • Turistički Prihvatni Kapacitet Crnogorskog Priobalnog Područja
    STRATEGIJA INTEGRALNOG UPRAVLJANJA OBALNIM PODRUČJEM CRNE GORE TURISTIČKI PRIHVATNI KAPACITET CRNOGORSKOG PRIOBALNOG PODRUČJA Zoran KLARIĆ Marina MARKOVIĆ (PAP/RAC) PAP/RAC, jul 2013. Strategija integralnog upravljanja obalnim područjem Crne Gore Program upravljanja obalnim područjem za Crnu Goru (CAMP Crna Gora) TURISTIČKI PRIHVATNI KAPACITET CRNOGORSKOG PRIOBALNOG PODRUČJA Autori: Zoran Klarić, Institut za turizam, Zagreb Marina Marković, Centar za regionalne aktivnosti programa prioritetnih akcija, Split Klarić, Z. i Marković, M. (2013). Turistički prihvatni kapacitet crnogorskog priobalnog područja. CAMP Crna Gora. Centar za regionalne aktivnosti programa prioritetnih akcija. Split “Ovaj izvještaj je pripremljen u sklopu Strateškog partnerstva za Mediteran – veliki morski ekosistemi (MedPartnership)” TURISTIČKI PRIHVATNI KAPACITET CRNOGORSKOG PRIOBALNOG PODRUČJA 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 1. OSNOVNI ELEMENTI PRIHVATNOG KAPACITETA VAŽNI ZA PRIOBALNO PODRUČJE CRNE GORE 5 1.1 VAŽNOST PROCJENE PRIHVATNOG KAPACITETA 5 1.2. OSNOVNI RAZVOJNI SCENARIJI 6 1.3 POLAZNE OSNOVE ZA ODREĐIVANJA PRIHVATNOG KAPACITETA ZA PRIOBALJE CRNE GORE 7 1.4 GEOPROMETNI POLOŽAJ PRIOBALJA CRNE GORE 11 1.5. PROSTORNO-PLANSKI PREDUVJETI 13 2. INDIKATORI PRIHVATNOG KAPACITETA 18 2.1. FIZIČKO-EKOLOŠKI INDIKATORI 20 2.1.1 FIZIČKI KAPACITET PLAŽA 20 KAPACITET S OBZIROM NA TURISTIČKI TIP PLAŽNOG PROSTORA 25 KAPACITET S OBZIROM NA PRIRODNU RANJIVOST PROSTORA 26 UKUPAN KAPACITET PLAŽA 27 2.1.2 IZGRAĐENOST OBALNOG PROSTORA 27 KORIŠTENJE INDIKATORA IZGRAĐENOSTI KOD PRIHVATNOG KAPACITETA 30 2.2. INFRASTRUKTURNI INDIKATORI 31 2.2.1 VODOSNABDIJEVANJE 31 2.2.2 ODVODNJA 32 2.2.3 KRUTI OTPAD 34 2.2.4 PROMETNA INFRASTRUKTURA 34 3. PROCJENA PRIHVATNOG KAPACITETA CRNOGORSKOG PRIOBALJA 41 3.1. INDIKATORI PRIHVATNOG KAPACITETA PO UŽIM CJELINAMA CRNOGORSKOG PRIOBALJA 41 3.2.
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter No
    Tourism Newsletter No. 2 NEWSLETTERtourism July 2015 1 NEWSLETTERtourism Foto: Luka Ratković July 2015 July 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS: 1 INTRODUCTION BY THE DIRECTOR OF THE NATIONAL MINISTRY OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AND TOURISM TOURISM ORGANIZATION OF MONTENEGRO Minister: Branimir Gvozdenović State Secretary for Tourism: Predrag Jelušić 2 JUNE TOPICAL ISSUES IN TOURISM Public Relations: 10 JUNE CENTRAL TOPIC Zoja Spahić Kustudić Milica Lekić 10 Interview with the Secretary General of the UN Ana Kostić Jovanović World Tourism Organization Address: IV Proleterske brigade 19 14 NEW HOTELS OPENED IN JUNE 81000 Podgorica, Montenegro Phone: PALMON BAY HOTEL & SPA, Igalo +382 (0)20 446 346 +382 (0)20 446 347 Hotel MAGNOLIJA, Tivat +382 (0)20 446 341 Fax: +382 (0)20 446 215 Apart Hotel SEA FORT, Sutomore E-mail: [email protected] Hotel PORTO SOLE, Sutomore Web site: www.mrt.gov.me Apart Hotel CRUISER, Ulcinj NATIONAL TOURISM ORGANIZATION OF MONTENEGRO 19 BATHING SITES IN MONTENEGRO Director: Blue Flag raised at 18 Bathing Sites Željka Radak Kukavičić Dolcinium Kitesurfing Club Address: Bulevar Svetog Petra Cetinjskog 130 20 ANNOUNCEMENTS OF JULY EVENTS 81000 Podgorica, Montenegro Phone: 20 Capital City of Podgorica +382 (0)77 100 001 Fax: +382 (0)77 100 009 21 Old Royal Capital of Cetinje E-mail: [email protected] 22 Central and Northern Region Web site: www.montenegro.travel 27 Coastal Region Call center: 1300 28 INTERNATIONAL MEDIA ON MONTENEGRO 30 TOURIST TURNOVER IN MONTENEGRO 30 Number of Tourists and Overnight Stays 31 Road Border Crossings 31 Sozina Tunnel 31 National Parks of Montenegro 31 Durmitor National Park 32 METEOROLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS IN JUNE Tourism Newsletter No.
    [Show full text]
  • Public-Private Partnerships in Montenegro
    Public-Private Partnerships in Montenegro Accountability, transparency and efficiency Title Public-Private Partnerships in Montenegro – Accountability, transparency and efficiency Publisher Institute Alternative Đoka Miraševića (“Kroling”) 3/3, Podgorica, Montenegro tel/fax: (+382) 020 268 686 e-mail: [email protected] web site: www.institut-alternativa.org For publisher: Stevo Muk, President of the Management Board Project Associates Stevo Muk, Jovana Marović, Jelena Džankić, Milica Popović, Milica Dragojević, Marko Sošić Translation Jelena Džankić Donor The preparation of this study has been supported by the Foundation Open Society Institute – Representative Office Montenegro (FOSI ROM) Layout and printing Studio Mouse total graphic center Circulation 100 Foundation Open Society Institute – Representative Office Montenegro (FOSI ROM) shall not be responsible or liable for information and opinions expressed in this document. The opinions and views expressed in this document are the sole responsibility of the authors. CONTENT 1. Research framework ...........................................................................................................................7 1.1. The definition of public-private partnership ......................................................................7 1.2. Subject and aims of research ..................................................................................................7 2. Legal framework of public-private partnerships ......................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Law on Courts of Montenegro
    Strasbourg, 20 October 2014 CDL-REF(2014)043 Engl.Only Opinion no. 790 / 2014 EUROPEAN COMMISSION FOR DEMOCRACY THROUGH LAW (VENICE COMMISSION) DRAFT LAW ON COURTS OF MONTENEGRO This document will not be distributed at the meeting. Please bring this copy. www.venice.coe.int 2 CDL-REF(2014)043 DRAFT LAW ON COURTS I BASIC PROVISIONS Scope Article 1 The present Law shall regulate establishment, organisation, and jurisdiction of courts; organisation of work of courts and judicial administration, and other matters of importance for orderly and timely functioning of courts. Judicial Power Article 2 Judicial power shall be exercised by courts established under the present Law. Courts shall decide on legal matters under their jurisdiction in a lawful, objective, and timely manner. Judicial office shall be exercised by judges and lay judges. Accessibility of Courts and Equality of Arms Article 3 Everyone shall have the right to address a court for the purpose of exercising his/her rights. Everyone shall be equal before a court. Publicity Article 4 The work of courts shall be public. Public nature of the work of courts shall be ensured in accordance with law. Impartiality Article 5 Everyone shall have the right to an impartial trial within a reasonable time and to have their legal matter, notwithstanding the parties and the characteristics of the legal matter, heard by a judge to whom the case was allocated randomly. Resources for Work of Courts Article 6 The resources and conditions for work of courts shall be ensured in the budget of Montenegro.
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    INTEGRATED SAFEGUARDS DATASHEET APPRAISAL STAGE I. Basic Information Date prepared/updated: 05/11/2010 Report No.: AC5125 Public Disclosure Authorized 1. Basic Project Data Original Project ID: P079116 Original Project Name: Environmentally Sensitive Tourist Areas Project (Montenegro) Country: Montenegro Project ID: P120659 Project Name: Additional Financing for Montenegro Environmentally Sensitive Tourist Areas Project Task Team Leader: Sanyu Sarah Senkatuka Lutalo Estimated Appraisal Date: June 14, 2010 Estimated Board Date: September 14, 2010 Managing Unit: ECSSD Lending Instrument: Specific Investment Loan Sector: Solid waste management (95%);Central government administration (5%) Public Disclosure Authorized Theme: Pollution management and environmental health (50%);Environmental policies and institutions (25%);Other urban development (25%) IBRD Amount (US$m.): 5.82 IDA Amount (US$m.): 0.00 GEF Amount (US$m.): 0.00 PCF Amount (US$m.): 0.00 Other financing amounts by source: Borrower 0.26 Financing Gap 0.30 0.56 Environmental Category: B - Partial Assessment Public Disclosure Authorized Simplified Processing Simple [] Repeater [] Is this project processed under OP 8.50 (Emergency Recovery) Yes [ ] No [X] or OP 8.00 (Rapid Response to Crises and Emergencies) 2. Project Objectives The main objective of the Project is to create ecological and commercially sustainable solid waste collection and disposal services in Montenegro coastal municipalities, needed to maintain a clean, environmentally attractive coastal area. This objective was
    [Show full text]
  • Summary Report of the Available Knowledge and Gap Analysis
    MONTENEGRO MINISTRY OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AND TOURISM PROJECT Montenegro: Platamuni and Ratac areas Summary report of the available knowledge and gap analysis Financed by: NOTE: The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this document do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNEP/MAP-RAC/SPA concerning the legal status of any State, Territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of their frontiers or boundaries. The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of UNEP/MAP-RAC/SPA. © 2016 United Nations Environment Programme Mediterranean Action Plan Regional Activity Centre for Specially Protected Areas (RAC/SPA) Boulevard du leader Yasser Arafat B.P. 337 - 1080 Tunis Cedex - TUNISIA E-mail: [email protected] All property rights of texts and content of different types of this publication belong exclusively to RAC/SPA. Reproduction of these texts and contents, in whole or in part, and in any form, is prohibited without prior written permission from RAC/SPA, except for educational and other non- commercial purposes, provided that the source is fully acknowledged. For bibliographic purposes, this volume may be cited as: UNEP/MAP-RAC/SPA, 2016. Montenegro: Platamuni and Ratac areas. Summary report of the available knowledge and gap analysis. By Torchia G., Pititto F., Rais C., Trainito E., Badalamenti F., Romano C., Amosso C., Bouafif C., Dragan M., Camisassi S., Tronconi D., Macicˇ ´ V., Sghaier Y.R. & Ouerghi A. Ed. RAC/SPA - MedKeyHabitats Project, Tunis: 32 p. Graphic design : Zine el Abidine MAHJOUB - www.zinetoon.com and Yassine Ramzi SGHAIER.
    [Show full text]
  • Spatial Plan Montenegro Eng Final
    Spatial Plan of Montenegro Until 2020 SPATIAL PLAN OF MONTENEGRO UNTIL 2020 Podgorica, March 2008 1 / 220 Spatial Plan of Montenegro Until 2020 Title of the document: Spatial Plan of Montenegro Until 2020 Ordering party: Ministry of Economic Development (Contract No. 01/367/2/02, 9 th December 2007) Contractor: “Montenegroinženjering”, Podgorica Technical support: GTZ German Technical Cooperation Elaboration: ‘Montenegroinženjering’, Podgorica, Ratimir Mugoša, CEO Institute for Architecture and Urbanism of Serbia, Belgrade, Nenad Spasi ć, Ph.D., CEO Institute for Urbanism of Slovenia, Kaliopa Dimitrovska Andrews, Ph.D., CEO Core Team for Elaboration and Synthesis of the Plan: Ratimir Mugoša, Architect, Coordinator of the elaboration and main planner Ivan Stani č, udia Miodrag Vujoševi ć, Ph.D. in Economics Predrag Bulaji ć, Graduate Engineer in Electrotechnics Svetislav Popovi ć, MA in Architecture Vasilije Radulovi ć, Graduate Engineer in Geology Extended Team for Elaboration and Synthesis of the Plan: Vasilije ðurovi ć, Architect Spatial organization and development Kaliopa Dimitrovska Andrews, PhD, udia Nenad Spasi ć, Ph.D., Architect Ksenija Vukmanovi ć, Architect Dragana Čeni ć, Architect Vasilije Radulovi ć, Geology Engineer Natural Spatial Characteristics Maja Ba ćovi ć, Ph.D. in Economics Demography Vasilije Buškovi ć, MA in Biology Qualities of environment and protection of nature 2 / 220 Spatial Plan of Montenegro Until 2020 Ljubiša Kuzovi ć, Traffic Engineer Traffic- economy activity Drašenko Glavni ć, Traffic Engineer Simeun
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Performance Review Yugoslavia
    ECONOMIC COMMISSION FOR EUROPE Committee on Environmental Policy ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE REVIEW YUGOSLAVIA UNITED NATIONS New York and Geneva, 2003 Environmental Performance Reviews Series No. 15 NOTE Symbols of United Nations documents are composed of capital letters combined with figures. Mention of such a symbol indicates a reference to a United Nations document. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. UNITED NATIONS PUBLICATION Sales No. E.03-II-E.24 ISBN 92-1-116839-2 ISSN 1020-4563 iii Foreword The Environmental Performance Reviews are intended to assist countries in transition to improve their management of the environment by establishing baseline conditions and making concrete recommendations for better policy implementation and performance and to integrate environmental policies into sectoral policies at the national level. Through the Peer Review process, they also promote dialogue among UNECE member countries and harmonization of environmental conditions and policies throughout the region. This work was initiated by ministers at the second Ministerial Conference “Environment for Europe,” in Lucerne, in 1993. Acting on the request of the ministers, the UNECE Committee on Environmental Policy, meeting in special session in January 1994, decided to make the Environmental Performance Reviews a part of its regular programme. As a voluntary exercise, the Environmental Performance Review is undertaken only at the request of the country itself at the ministerial level.
    [Show full text]
  • Results Achieved and Project Best Practices of IPA CBC Albania
    This program is funded by EU RESULTS ACHIEVED AND PROJECT BEST PRACTICES OF IPA CBC 2007-2013 IPA CROSS BORDER COOPERATION PROGRAMME BETWEEN ALBANIA AND MONTENEGRO 2007—2013 IPA CBC AL - MNE 2007 - 2013 Minister of European Integration Albania - Text Montenegro2007 Photo - 2013 IPA CBC AL - MNE 2007 - 2013 Programme Area 2013 - Montenegro2007 - Albania ALBANIA: Territory = 5.936 km2 Population = 337,247 inhabitants Shkoder Region Kukes Region MONTENEGRO: Territory = 5.745 km2 Population = 377,366 inhabitants Budva Municipality Berane Municipality Andrijevica Municipality Plav Municipality Danilovgrad Municipality Podgorica Municipality Cetinje Municipality Ulcinj Municipality Bar Municipality . Total Cross Border Programming area Territory = 11.681 km2. Population = 714,613 inhabitants IPA CBC AL - MNE 2007 - 2013 Page 4 The Commission adopted on 18 December 2007 the Cross-border Pro- Albania gramme between Albania and Montenegro under the IPA Cross-border cooperation Component, for the year 2007 . - Montenegro2007 Albania-Montenegro IPA cross-border programme has been elabo- rated in accordance with the following regulations: Council Regulation (EC) No 1085/2006 of 17 July 2006 establish- ing an Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance (IPA); - Commission Regulation (EC) No 718/2007 of 12 June 2007 im- 2013 plementing Council Regulation (EC) No1085/2006 establishing an Instrument for pre-accession assistance (IPA), amended by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1292/2011 of 9 December 2011. The overall objective of this programme
    [Show full text]
  • My Town About My Money Report on the Reforma Javnih Finansijaopenness I of Poreskalocal Tajna: Budgets Kroz Prizmu Opštinskog Duga
    GDJE IDE MOJ NOVAC MY TOWN ABOUT MY MONEY REPORT ON THE REFORMA JAVNIH FINANSIJAOPENNESS I OF PORESKALOCAL TAJNA: BUDGETS KROZ PRIZMU OPŠTINSKOG DUGA This Project is fnanced by the European Union and co-fnanced by the Ministry of Public Administration of Montenegro. Ministarstvo javne uprave Publication: My Town About My Money (Report on the Openness of Local Budgets) Publisher: Institute Alternative 57, George Washington Boulevard Podgorica, Montenegro Tel/Fax: (+382) 20 268 686 E-mail: [email protected] For the publisher: Stevo Muk Editor: Milena Muk Researcher: Naziv Velić Research assistants: Nikoleta Pavićević and Almedina Dodić Design and prepress: Ana Jovović Podgorica, February 2019. Ministarstvo javne uprave This Report was prepared within the project “Money Watch: Civil Society Guarding the Budget”, implemented by the Institute Alternative in cooperation with the Institute of Public Finance and NGO New Horizon, supported by the European Union and co-financed by the Ministry of Public Administration. The contents of this Report are the exclusive responsibility of the authors and in no way reflect the opinion of the European Union or the Ministry of Public Administration. CIP - KAТАЛОГИЗАЦИЈА У ПУБЛИКАЦИЈИ НАЦИОНАЛНА БИБЛИОТЕКА ЦРНЕ ГОРЕ, ЦЕТИЊЕ ISBN 978-9940-533-78-6 COBISS.CG-ID 39197200 2 TAB LE OF CONTE NTS Introduction ............................................................................5 Overview of transparency results, by municipality ......................................7 Andrijevica .........................................................................7
    [Show full text]