DOCSLIB.ORG

Environmental Performance Review Yugoslavia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

ECONOMIC COMMISSION FOR EUROPE Committee on Environmental Policy ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE REVIEW YUGOSLAVIA UNITED NATIONS New York and Geneva, 2003 Environmental Performance Reviews Series No. 15 NOTE Symbols of United Nations documents are composed of capital letters combined with figures. Mention of such a symbol indicates a reference to a United Nations document. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. UNITED NATIONS PUBLICATION Sales No. E.03-II-E.24 ISBN 92-1-116839-2 ISSN 1020-4563 iii Foreword The Environmental Performance Reviews are intended to assist countries in transition to improve their management of the environment by establishing baseline conditions and making concrete recommendations for better policy implementation and performance and to integrate environmental policies into sectoral policies at the national level. Through the Peer Review process, they also promote dialogue among UNECE member countries and harmonization of environmental conditions and policies throughout the region. This work was initiated by ministers at the second Ministerial Conference “Environment for Europe,” in Lucerne, in 1993. Acting on the request of the ministers, the UNECE Committee on Environmental Policy, meeting in special session in January 1994, decided to make the Environmental Performance Reviews a part of its regular programme. As a voluntary exercise, the Environmental Performance Review is undertaken only at the request of the country itself at the ministerial level. The studies are carried out by international teams of experts from the region, working closely with national experts from the reviewed country. Through a process of broad consultations, the experts carry out a comprehensive assessment of a wide range of issues related to the environment, covering three broad themes: the framework for environmental policy and management, management of pollution and natural resources and economic and sectoral integration. The team’s final report contains recommendations for further improvement, taking into consideration the country’s progress in the current transition period. The teams also benefit from close cooperation with other organizations in the United Nations system, including the United Nations Development Programme, the United Nations Environment Programme, the World Bank and the World Health Organization. This Environmental Performance Review is the fifteenth in the series published by the United Nations Economic Commission. I hope that this Review will be useful to all countries in the region, to intergovernmental and non-governmental organization and, especially, to Yugoslavia, to its Government, all national stakeholders, to its people. Brigita Schmögnerova Executive Secretary iv Preface The Environmental Performance Review (EPR) of Yugoslavia began with a preparatory mission in January 2002, when agreement was reached on both the structure and the organizational details of the project, taking into account, in particular, the considerable changes that the country had undergone during its ten-year isolation. The review mission took place in April 2002. The review team included experts from Canada, Croatia, Denmark, France, Italy and Sweden, together with experts from the secretariat of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE), the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), the World Health Organization (WHO) and the World Bank. The draft was submitted for consideration to the EPR Expert Group of the UNECE Committee on Environmental Policy in October 2002. During this meeting, the Expert Group discussed the report in detail with representatives of Yugoslavia, focusing in particular on the conclusions and recommendations. The EPR report, as amended by the Expert Group, was then submitted for peer review to the UNECE Committee on Environmental Policy at its annual session in Geneva on 4-6 November 2002. A delegation consisting of high-level representatives of the Federal Government of Yugoslavia, and its constituent republics Serbia and Montenegro participated in the peer review. The Committee adopted the recommendations as set out in this report. The Environmental Performance Review of Yugoslavia took place at a particularly interesting time in Yugoslavia. The Government was preparing new constitutions for the federation and the republics that would, inter alia, change their respective responsibilities. It was not within the competence of the EPR experts to anticipate decisions. Consequently, the review attempts to look at all relevant issues within the context of the Federal Government, Serbia and Montenegro, with recommendations addressed to each, as considered appropriate. Kosovo and Metohija was also included in the review but has been presented in a separate section in deference to the special status accorded it by United Nations Security Council resolution 1244 of 10 June 1999, which authorizes the United Nations Interim Administration Mission in Kosovo (UNMIK) to, inter alia, “provide an interim administration for Kosovo under which the people of Kosovo can enjoy substantial autonomy within the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, and which will provide transitional administration while establishing and overseeing the development of provisional democratic self-governing institutions to ensure conditions for a peaceful and normal life for all inhabitants of Kosovo.” The review of Yugoslavia’s environmental performance is evidence of the efforts that the Government, at all levels, is making to improve environmental management, including by developing and implementing new legislation adapted to European standards. The EPR team, with the assistance of national experts, prepared an analysis and offered recommendations for future action in a number of areas, including the decision-making framework, economic instruments and financing, environmental information and public participation, management of waste, air quality, water, and mineral resources, agriculture and biodiversity, industry, energy, transport, sustainable tourism and human health. The UNECE Committee on Environmental Policy and the UNECE review team would like to thank both the Government of Yugoslavia for its invitation to carry out this review and the many excellent local experts who worked with the international experts and contributed with their knowledge and assistance. UNECE wishes Yugoslavia and its constituent republics Serbia and Montenegro success in carrying out the tasks before them to meet their environmental objectives and policy, including implementation of the recommendations aiming to support and promote overall environmental protection and improve health and living standards. v UNECE would also like to express its appreciation to the Governments of Denmark, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands and Sweden for their support to the Environmental Performance Review Programme, to the United Nations Mission in Kosovo (UNMIK), United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) offices in Belgrade and Podgorica, to the UNEP Regional Office in Europe (ROE), and to the WHO European Centre for Environment and Health (ECEH) for their participation in the Yugoslav review mission and the preparation of this report. Special thanks also go to the World Bank, which was carrying out an Environment Sector Review in Yugoslavia, under the leadership of Mr. Arcadie Capcelea in parallel to the EPR mission. The World Bank team and the EPR team cooperated fully, and the World Bank provided its water expert to draft chapter 5 of this EPR. vi LIST OF TEAM MEMBERS Ms. Mary Pat SILVEIRA (ECE secretariat) Team Leader Ms. Catherine MASSON (ECE secretariat) Project Coordinator Mr. Antoine NUNES Mr. Jyrki HIRVONEN (ECE secretariat) Introduction Mr. René NIJENHUIS (ECE secretariat) Chapter 1 Ms. Mijke HERTOGHS (ECE secretariat) Chapter 2 Mr. Antoine NUNES (ECE secretariat) Chapter 3 Ms. Mijke HERTOGHS Mr. Harald EGERER (UNEP) Chapter 4 Ms. Rita KLEES (World Bank) Chapter 5 Mr. Andrzej JAGUSIEWICZ (POLAND) Chapter 6 Mr. Ivan NARKEVITCH (ECE secretariat) Chapter 7 Ms. Helle HUSUM Ms. Karin REQUIA (FRANCE) Chapter 8 Ms. Stella SATALIC (CROATIA) Chapter 9 Mr. Peter Lind JANS (DENMARK) Chapter 10 Ms. Annika ERIKSSON (SWEDEN) Chapter 11 Mr. Bo LIBERT (ECE secretariat) Chapter 12 Ms. M.H. Louise GRENIER (CANADA) Chapter 13 Ms. Laura SUSANI (ITALY) Chapter 14 Mr. Stephan BÖSE-O’REILLY (WHO/ECEH) Chapter 15 Kosovo Mr. Ivan NARKEVITCH Mr. René NIJENHUIS (ECE secretariat) Ms. Mijke HERTOGHS The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. In particular, the boundaries shown on the maps do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by the United Nations. The preparatory mission for the project took place from 19 to 25 January 2002. The review mission was organized from 15 to 26 April 2002. vii List of National Contributors The Federal Republic Mr. Miroslav Nikčević Federal Secretariat of Labour, Health and Social Care (Assistant Federal Secretary) Environment Department
Recommended publications
  • Montenegro Old and New: History, Politics, Culture, and the People

    Montenegro Old and New: History, Politics, Culture, and the People

    60 ZuZana Poláčková; Pieter van Duin Montenegro Old and New: History, Politics, Culture, and the People The authors are focusing on how Montenegro today is coming to terms with the task of becoming a modern European nation, which implies recognition not only of democracy, the rule of law, and so forth, but also of a degree of ‘multiculturalism’, that is recognition of the existence of cultural, ethnic, linguistic and religious minorities in a society that is dominated by a Slavic Orthodox majority. In his context they are analyzing the history of the struggle of the Montenegrin people against a host of foreign invaders – after they had ceased to be invaders themselves – and especially their apparently consistent refusal to accept Ottoman sovereignty over their homeland seemed to make them the most remarkable freedom fighters imaginable and led to the creation of a special Montenegrin image in Europe. This im- age of heroic stubbornness and unique martial bravery was even consciously cultivated in Western and Central Europe from the early nineteenth century onwards, as the Greeks, the Serbs, the Montenegrins and other Balkan peoples began to resist the Ottoman Empire in a more effective way and the force of Romantic nationalism began to influence the whole of Europe, from German historians to British politi- cians, and also including Montenegrin and Serbian poets themselves. And what about the present situa- tion? The authors of this essay carried out an improvised piece of investigation into current conditions, attitudes, and feelings on both the Albanian and the Slavic-Montenegrin side (in September 2012). key words: Montenegro; history; multiculturalism; identity; nationalism; Muslim; Orthodox Montenegro (Crna Gora, Tsrna Gora, Tsernagora) is a small country in the Western Balkans region with some 625,000 inhabitants,1 which became an independent nation in 2006 and a can- didate-member of the EU in 2010.
  • Management Plan for the Conservation and Sustainable Use of the Natural Values of the Privately Owned Nature Park “Solana Ulcinj”, Montenegro

    Management Plan for the Conservation and Sustainable Use of the Natural Values of the Privately Owned Nature Park “Solana Ulcinj”, Montenegro

    5 Management Plan for the Conservation and Sustainable Use of the Natural Values of the Privately Owned Nature Park “Solana Ulcinj”, Montenegro Landesmuseum Joanneum Zoologie Borut STUMBERGER, Peter SACKL, Darko SAVELJI, Martin SCHNEIDER-JACOBY Management Plan for the Conservation and Sustainable Use of the Natural Values of the Privately Owned Nature Park “Solana Ulcinj”, Montenegro March 2007 Reprinted from: Joannea-Zoologie 10, 2008 Published by EuroNatur – Stiftung Europäisches Naturerbe Steiermärkisches Landesmuseum Joanneum – Zoologie with support by the MAVA Foundation Graz, December 2008 Selbstverlag Landesmuseum Joanneum, Zoologie, 8010 Graz, Raubergasse 10. Druck und Endfertigung: Druckerei Khil, Graz. Graz, 2008 Photos front cover: Greater Flamingo (M. Tiefenbach), Dalmatian Pelican (L. Khil), European Bee-eater (P. Sackl) and Solana Ulcinj, Jezero 2 (M. Schneider-Jacoby). Joannea Zool. 10: 5–84 (2008) Management plan for the conservation and sustainable use of the natural values of the privately owned Nature Park «Solana Ulcinj», Montenegro1 March 2007 Borut STUMBERGER, Peter SACKL, Darko SAVELJI and Martin SCHNEIDER-JACOBY Contents Abstract .................................................................................................... 7 Sažetak ..................................................................................................... 8 Abstrakt .................................................................................................... 9 Zusammenfassung ....................................................................................
  • Bratimljenjebratimljenje

    Bratimljenjebratimljenje

    1 2 BRATIMLJENJEBRATIMLJENJE 3 Zahvaljujući ubrzanom razvoju moderne informacione i komunikacione tehnologije, svijet se sve češće opisuje kao „Globalno selo“. Globalizacija i evropska integracija podrazumijevaju svijet u kojem je sve veća povezanost i međuzavisnost, i u kojem se takmičimo i sarađujemo jedni sa drugima. U ovakvom okruženju koje se brzo mijenja, lokalna vlast mora da odigra ključnu ulogu u aktivnom radu sa evropskim i međunarodnim partnerima. Formalne veze i partnerstva pobratimljenih gradova i opština, zasnovane na zajedničkoj izgradnji institucionalnih kapaciteta i razmjeni iskustava, ne samo da pomažu u prevazilaženju kulturnih barijera, već im i obezbjeđuju mogućnost da uče jedni od drugih. Danas su naše lokalne vlasti uspostavile mrežu i spone partnerstva, koji predstavljaju novi oblik međunarodne saradnje. Polazeći od formalnog bratimljenja gradova, do tehničke pomoći i partnerstva, koji se baziraju na realizaciji projekata, a sve u cilju stvaranja kapaciteta - sve ove spone pružaju nam mogućnost da razmjenimo iskustva i da učimo jedni od drugih, da pronalazimo efikasna rešenja za ozbiljne probleme i da stremimo ka stabilnosti i miru. Uz to, želja Crne Gore da postane članica Evropske unije podrazumijeva poštovanje drugih naroda i kultura i predstavljanje crnogorskog načina života i kulture drugima. Za postizanje toga cilja teško da postoji direktniji način od bratimljenja gradova. Zajednica opština Crne Gore je, uz podršku OEBS-a, pripremila ovu publikaciju u želji da podstakne bratimljenje crnogorskih lokalnih samouprava sa gradovima Evrope i svijeta. Ovom publikacijom su predstavljene naše lokalne samouprave sa kratkim prikazom svojih specifičnosti, istorijskih osobenosti i bogatstvom kulturnog nasledja sa ciljem da se povežemo sa većim brojem gradova i opština i ostvarimo jak osjećaj prijateljstva i zajedničkog evropskog indetiteta.
  • Towards an Integrated Marine Good Environmental Status (GES)

    Towards an Integrated Marine Good Environmental Status (GES)

    Towards an Integrated Marine Good Environmental Status (GES) Assessment for Montenegro Assessment of the MarineLogos Environment en anglais, avec versions courtes des and the Sustainabilitylogos ONU Environnem ent et PAM of Ecosystem Values La version longue des logos ONU Environnem ent et PAM doit être utilisée dans les docum ents ou juridiques. L a v ersion cour te des logos est destin e tous les produits de com m unication tourn s vers le public. Compiled and edited: Ana Štrbenac (lead) Marina Marković, Carlos Guitart, Anis Zarrouk, Ivan Sekovski Authors: EO1 and EO2: Ana Štrbenac – lead author Vesna Mačić, Slavica Petović; Mirko Đurović, Dragana Drakulović, Branka Pestorić, Darko Saveljić, Ivana Stojanović, Milena Bataković, Anis Zarrouk EO5: Robert Precali – lead author Danijela Šuković EO7: Branka Grbec EO8: Željka Čurović EO9: Carlos Guitart – lead author Danijela Šuković, Aleksandra Ivanović, Darinka Joksimović, Ivana Stojanović, Ivan Sekovski, Marina Marković EO10: Milica Mandić – lead expert Editing: Cover design: swim2birds.co.uk Graphic design: Old School S.P. Proofreading: N. Yonow Cover photograph: Ghost nets in Montenegro; M. Mandić The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. This study was prepared by PAP/RAC, SPA/RAC, UNEP/MAP, and the Ministry of Ecology, Spatial Planning and Urbanism of Montenegro within the GEF Adriatic Project and supported by the Global Environment Facility (GEF).
  • Example of Good Practice Increase Revenues for the Local Population

    Example of Good Practice Increase Revenues for the Local Population

    Example of good practice Increase revenues for the local population through sustainable tourist at Šasko Lake Category Tourism; local products; management; culture Organization Green Home – Zeleni dom Partners Ulcinj municipality, Šas restaurant, local tourist boards, Ora NGO Location Šasko Lake Country Montenegro Form of protection Not a protected area Scope of implementation (local, Local (municipality) and national level national) Time 4 years People 7 Budget 111 000 EUR Funding Partner Fund for Critical Ecosystems Project info https://www.sasko.me/ Contact Nataša Kovačević Achievements ● Registration of local producers (honey, olive oil, wine) at Šasko Lake – 15 representatives. ● Formation of a joint platform of local households (20-40) having revenues from the sale of local products ● 5 trained birdwatching guides ● During the public debate on the Draft Urban Plan for the Ulcinj municipality, proposed golf course (50 ha) at Šasko Lake was rejected. Problem/opportunity Problem ● Lack of will to protect the area ● Large migration of the local population ● Poaching ● Lack of promotion of local products and areas Opportunity ● Natural values of Šasko Lake ● Organic production ● Authentic cultural and natural area ● Development of eco-tourism ● Sustainable development ● Joint management of natural values ● Local products Planning Pre-requisites for success Legal: ● Ensuring participation of the local population in the decision-making process in drafting spatial plans Local community: ● Community wants to protect its natural resources ● Active community, trust towards NGOs (representative was a minority member) Initial idea Increasing revenues for the local population through sustainable tourism on Šasko Lake for its conservation and protection. The desire to show the development of eco-tourism is a tool for the sustainable development of Montenegro.
  • Izveštaj Nezavisnog Revizora O Obavljenoj Reviziji Nacrta Završnog Računa Opštine Novi Kneževac Za 2012. Godinu

    Izveštaj Nezavisnog Revizora O Obavljenoj Reviziji Nacrta Završnog Računa Opštine Novi Kneževac Za 2012. Godinu

    IZVEŠTAJ NEZAVISNOG REVIZORA O OBAVLJENOJ REVIZIJI NACRTA ZAVRŠNOG RAČUNA OPŠTINE NOVI KNEŽEVAC ZA 2012. GODINU Jun 2013. godine CONFIDA - FINODIT Nacrt završnog računa za 2012. godinu CONFIDA FINODIT Preduzeće za reviziju Beograd, Imotska 1 SADRŽAJ: 1 FINANSIJSKI IZVEŠTAJI .................................................................................................................. 6 1.1 BILANS STANJA NA DAN 31.12.2012. GODINE ........................................................................................ 6 1.2 BILANS PRIHODA I RASHODA NA DAN 31.12.2012. GODINE .............................................................. 9 1.3 IZVEŠTAJ O KAPITALNIM IZDACIMA I PRIMANJIMA NA DAN 31.12.2012. GODINE .................... 13 1.4 IZVEŠTAJ O NOVČANIM TOKOVIMA NA DAN 31.12.2012. GODINE ................................................. 14 1.5 IZVEŠTAJ O IZVRŠENJU BUDDŽETA NA DAN 31.12.2012. GODINE ................................................. 18 2. NAPOMENE UZ FINANSIJSKE IZVEŠTAJE ................................................................................ 24 2.1. OSNOVNI PODACI O SUBJEKTU REVIZIJE ........................................................................................... 24 2.2. NORMATIVNA REGULATIVA I PROCEDURA DONOŠENJA BUDžETA ............................................ 24 2.3. PLANIRANA SREDSTVA BUDžETA ......................................................................................................... 27 2.4. OSNOVE ZA SASTAVLJANJE I PRIKAZIVANJE FINANSIJSKIH IZVEŠTAJA ..................................
  • Municipal Assembly, Budget, General Information, Public Procurement, Public Discussions and Public Competitions

    Municipal Assembly, Budget, General Information, Public Procurement, Public Discussions and Public Competitions

    1 TRANSPARENCY INDEX OF MONTENEGRIN MUNICIPALITIES Podgorica, 2020 TRANSPARENCY INDEX OF MONTENEGRIN MUNICIPALITIES Publisher: Centar za građansko obrazovanje (CGO) Editor: Daliborka Uljarević Lead author: Mira Popović Co-authors: Maja Marinović Ana Nenezić Research Associate: Vasilije Radulović Design and Production: Centar za građansko obrazovanje (CGO) Print: 170 primjeraka The report is part of the project “Let’s put corruption in the museum!” implemented by the Centre for Civic Education (CCE) in partnership with NGO Centre for Monitoring and Research (CeMI), NGO Bonum from Pljevlja, NGO UL-Info from Ulcinj and NGO Za Druga from Petrovac, in cooperation with the Ministry of Public Administration and the Agency for Prevention Corruption (APC), funded by the European Union with co-financing from the Ministry of Public Administration. The content of this publication is the sole responsibility of the CCE and CEMI and in no manner can it be interpreted as an official position of the European Union or the Ministry of Public Administration. SADRŽAJ Introduction 6 Methodology 7 General assessment of the state of transparency of municipalities in Montenegro 11 How transparent are Montenegrin municipalities? 16 • Andrijevica 17 • Bar 20 • Berane 23 • Bijelo Polje 26 • Budva 29 • Cetinje 32 • Danilovgrad 35 • Golubovci 38 • Gusinje 41 • Herceg Novi 44 • Kolašin 47 • Kotor 50 • Mojkovac 53 • Nikšić 56 • Petnjica 59 • Plav 62 • Pljevlja 65 • Plužine 68 • Podgorica 71 • Rožaje 74 • Šavnik 77 • Tivat 80 • Tuzi 83 • Ulcinj 86 • Žabljak 89 Research 92 Final remarks 101 6 INTRODUCTION Fight against corruption requires a multidisciplinary, continuous and multifaceted approach, and one of the preconditions is a high degree of transparency in the work of public sector bodies.
  • BAR-Cazim Nikesic

    BAR-Cazim Nikesic

    REPUBLIC OF MONTENEGRO OPŠTINA BAR MUNICIPALITY OF BAR Created by Ćazim Nikezić 1 OPŠTINA BAR MUNICIPALITY OF BAR Where we are BAR Bar is situated in the south-eastern part of Montenegro at the latitude 42 degrees north and at the longitude 19 degrees east. Bar is only 55 km far from the Montenegrin capital Podgorica and is at the distance of 45 km from the international airport Podgorica and 60 km fro the international airport Tivat. Bar is the connection between Montenegro and the world. Created by Ćazim Nikezić 2 OPŠTINA BAR MUNICIPALITY OF BAR SITE MAP Created by Ćazim Nikezić 3 OPŠTINA BAR MUNICIPALITY OF BAR POPULATION Bar’s municipality has got 83 settlements and 47.768 inhabitants. It is devided into 12 local communities. Bar is famous for its multi-nationalities. Its wealth consists of 25 nationalities which are settled in this area. The number of inhabitants increased from 1948 to 2003. more than 100% - from 21.000 to 47.768 in 2003. There are 11.584 young people and 4.619 penssioners. There are 3.920 unemployees. Created by Ćazim Nikezić 4 OPŠTINA BAR MUNICIPALITY OF BAR TRANSPORT NETWORK Road traffic: - Bar-Podgorica-Beograd /East Europe - Bar-Dubrovnik-West-Nord Europe - Bar-Shkoder-Tirana-South Europe Railroad system - all European directions - Bar-Podgorica-Beograd /East Europe Maritime transport -Bar- biggest Montenegrin port -Ferries: Bar –Bar, Bar-Ancona Air traffic – Airport of Podgorica -45 km – Airport of Tivat -60 km Created by Ćazim Nikezić 5 OPŠTINA BAR MUNICIPALITY OF BAR TOURISM Bar represents modern city that each day is expanding.
  • (MNEE) Database Electoral Maps of Montenegro

    (MNEE) Database Electoral Maps of Montenegro

    Montenegrin Elections (MNEE) Database i Electoral Maps of Montenegro III 6 VI 5 V XI 9 3 II 5 XIII 4 IV XIV 2 VIII 5 VII 17 3 IX 1 XII I 4 4 X 3 Version 1.0 Prepared by Boris Lipovina April 2021 i The map represents a vectorized, adapted and modified version of an administrative map of Montenegro created by Wikipedia user NordNordWest who released their map under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Germany license (URL of a license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/de/deed.en). i 1996 Parliamentary Elections ................................................................... 11 Contents 14 Constituencies System Introduction .....................................................................................................1 1996 Parliamentary Elections ...................................................................12 Seats and Percentage of Votes Won in Constituency, per Party/Coalition Administrative Maps of Montenegro ...................................................... 2 Official Map and Map Used for Depicting the Electoral System 1998 Parliamentary Elections ...................................................................13 The “Special Constituency”* System Administrative Maps of Municipalities - I ............................................... 3 Determining Precise Geographical Location of Special Polling Stations (1998-2009) 2001 Parliamentary Elections ..................................................................14 The “Minority Sub-Constituency”* System Administrative Maps of Municipalities
  • Turistički Prihvatni Kapacitet Crnogorskog Priobalnog Područja

    Turistički Prihvatni Kapacitet Crnogorskog Priobalnog Područja

    STRATEGIJA INTEGRALNOG UPRAVLJANJA OBALNIM PODRUČJEM CRNE GORE TURISTIČKI PRIHVATNI KAPACITET CRNOGORSKOG PRIOBALNOG PODRUČJA Zoran KLARIĆ Marina MARKOVIĆ (PAP/RAC) PAP/RAC, jul 2013. Strategija integralnog upravljanja obalnim područjem Crne Gore Program upravljanja obalnim područjem za Crnu Goru (CAMP Crna Gora) TURISTIČKI PRIHVATNI KAPACITET CRNOGORSKOG PRIOBALNOG PODRUČJA Autori: Zoran Klarić, Institut za turizam, Zagreb Marina Marković, Centar za regionalne aktivnosti programa prioritetnih akcija, Split Klarić, Z. i Marković, M. (2013). Turistički prihvatni kapacitet crnogorskog priobalnog područja. CAMP Crna Gora. Centar za regionalne aktivnosti programa prioritetnih akcija. Split “Ovaj izvještaj je pripremljen u sklopu Strateškog partnerstva za Mediteran – veliki morski ekosistemi (MedPartnership)” TURISTIČKI PRIHVATNI KAPACITET CRNOGORSKOG PRIOBALNOG PODRUČJA 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 1. OSNOVNI ELEMENTI PRIHVATNOG KAPACITETA VAŽNI ZA PRIOBALNO PODRUČJE CRNE GORE 5 1.1 VAŽNOST PROCJENE PRIHVATNOG KAPACITETA 5 1.2. OSNOVNI RAZVOJNI SCENARIJI 6 1.3 POLAZNE OSNOVE ZA ODREĐIVANJA PRIHVATNOG KAPACITETA ZA PRIOBALJE CRNE GORE 7 1.4 GEOPROMETNI POLOŽAJ PRIOBALJA CRNE GORE 11 1.5. PROSTORNO-PLANSKI PREDUVJETI 13 2. INDIKATORI PRIHVATNOG KAPACITETA 18 2.1. FIZIČKO-EKOLOŠKI INDIKATORI 20 2.1.1 FIZIČKI KAPACITET PLAŽA 20 KAPACITET S OBZIROM NA TURISTIČKI TIP PLAŽNOG PROSTORA 25 KAPACITET S OBZIROM NA PRIRODNU RANJIVOST PROSTORA 26 UKUPAN KAPACITET PLAŽA 27 2.1.2 IZGRAĐENOST OBALNOG PROSTORA 27 KORIŠTENJE INDIKATORA IZGRAĐENOSTI KOD PRIHVATNOG KAPACITETA 30 2.2. INFRASTRUKTURNI INDIKATORI 31 2.2.1 VODOSNABDIJEVANJE 31 2.2.2 ODVODNJA 32 2.2.3 KRUTI OTPAD 34 2.2.4 PROMETNA INFRASTRUKTURA 34 3. PROCJENA PRIHVATNOG KAPACITETA CRNOGORSKOG PRIOBALJA 41 3.1. INDIKATORI PRIHVATNOG KAPACITETA PO UŽIM CJELINAMA CRNOGORSKOG PRIOBALJA 41 3.2.
  • Newsletter No

    Newsletter No

    Tourism Newsletter No. 2 NEWSLETTERtourism July 2015 1 NEWSLETTERtourism Foto: Luka Ratković July 2015 July 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS: 1 INTRODUCTION BY THE DIRECTOR OF THE NATIONAL MINISTRY OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AND TOURISM TOURISM ORGANIZATION OF MONTENEGRO Minister: Branimir Gvozdenović State Secretary for Tourism: Predrag Jelušić 2 JUNE TOPICAL ISSUES IN TOURISM Public Relations: 10 JUNE CENTRAL TOPIC Zoja Spahić Kustudić Milica Lekić 10 Interview with the Secretary General of the UN Ana Kostić Jovanović World Tourism Organization Address: IV Proleterske brigade 19 14 NEW HOTELS OPENED IN JUNE 81000 Podgorica, Montenegro Phone: PALMON BAY HOTEL & SPA, Igalo +382 (0)20 446 346 +382 (0)20 446 347 Hotel MAGNOLIJA, Tivat +382 (0)20 446 341 Fax: +382 (0)20 446 215 Apart Hotel SEA FORT, Sutomore E-mail: [email protected] Hotel PORTO SOLE, Sutomore Web site: www.mrt.gov.me Apart Hotel CRUISER, Ulcinj NATIONAL TOURISM ORGANIZATION OF MONTENEGRO 19 BATHING SITES IN MONTENEGRO Director: Blue Flag raised at 18 Bathing Sites Željka Radak Kukavičić Dolcinium Kitesurfing Club Address: Bulevar Svetog Petra Cetinjskog 130 20 ANNOUNCEMENTS OF JULY EVENTS 81000 Podgorica, Montenegro Phone: 20 Capital City of Podgorica +382 (0)77 100 001 Fax: +382 (0)77 100 009 21 Old Royal Capital of Cetinje E-mail: [email protected] 22 Central and Northern Region Web site: www.montenegro.travel 27 Coastal Region Call center: 1300 28 INTERNATIONAL MEDIA ON MONTENEGRO 30 TOURIST TURNOVER IN MONTENEGRO 30 Number of Tourists and Overnight Stays 31 Road Border Crossings 31 Sozina Tunnel 31 National Parks of Montenegro 31 Durmitor National Park 32 METEOROLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS IN JUNE Tourism Newsletter No.
  • Distribution of Bats (Chiroptera) in Montenegro

    Distribution of Bats (Chiroptera) in Montenegro

    Vespertilio 17: 129–156, 2014 ISSN 1213-6123 Distribution of bats (Chiroptera) in Montenegro Primož Presetnik1, Milan Paunović2, Branko karapandža3, Marina Đurović4, Čeda Ivanović5, Maša ždralević6, Petr BENDA7 & Ivana Budinski8 1 Centre for Cartography of Fauna and Flora, Ljubljana office, Klunova 3, SI–1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia; [email protected] 2 Natural History Museum, Njegoševa 51, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia; [email protected] 3 Wildlife Conservation Society “Mustela”, Njegoševa 51, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia; [email protected] 4 Public Enterprise for National Parks of Montenegro, Put Radomira Ivanovića br 2, 81000 Podgorica, Montenegro; [email protected] 5 Natural History Museum of Montenegro, Trg Vojvode Bećir Bega Osmanagića 6, 81000 Podgorica, Montenegro; [email protected] 6 National Research Council, Institute of Biomembranes and Bioenergetics, Bari, Italy; [email protected] 7 Department of Zoology, National Museum (Natural History), Václavské nám. 68, 115 79 Praha 1 & Department of Zoology, Charles University, Viničná 7, 128 44 Praha 2, Czech Republic; [email protected] 8 Department of Genetic Research, Institute for Biological Research “Siniša Stanković”, University of Belgrade, Bulevar despota Stefana 142, 11060 Belgrade, Serbia; [email protected] Abstract. The first detailed review of the distribution of bats in Montenegro is presented. Altogether 28 species were confirmed to occur in the country:Rhinolophus ferrumequinum (55 records), R. hippo- sideros (54), R. euryale (12), R. blasii (5), Myotis myotis (7), M. blythii (37), M. nattereri (12), M. emar- ginatus (12), M. mystacinus (12), M. alcathoe (1), M. brandtii (2), M. daubentonii (3), M. capaccinii (32), Vespertilio murinus (4), Eptesicus serotinus (7), Hypsugo savii (18), Pipistrellus pipistrellus (22), P.