DOCSLIB.ORG

CBD Strategy and Action Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
CBD Strategy and Action Plan Montenegro Ministry for Spatial Planning and Environment National Biodiversity Strategy with the Action Plan for the period 2010 – 2015 DRAFT Podgorica July, 2010 Ministry for Spatial Planning and Environment National Biodiversity Strategy with the Action Plan for the period 2010 – 2015 Podgorica, July 2010 Prepared by: Dragan Roganović, PhD (Republican Nature Protection Agency), Leader of the Team for Drafting of the National Biodiversity Strategy with the Action Plan, in cooperation with Miss Milena Kapa (Ministry for Spatial Planning and Environment), independent advisor for nature protection, Project coordinator Zlatko Bulić, Director of the Republican Nature Protection Agency and with the assistance of Vasilije Bušković MSc (Republican Nature Protection Agency) The National Biodiversity Strategy with the Action Plan represents the result of 14 month work invested within the joint project of the Ministry of Tourism and Environment and UNDP financed by the Global Environment Facility - GEF. Project implementation was supervised by the Project Management Commission composed of: Siniša Stanković, Deputy minister, Ministry for Spatial Planning and Environment, Chairman, Milica Begović Radojevic PhD, Leader of Environment Cluster in UNDP, Co-chairman, Milosav Anđelić PhD, assistant to the Minister, Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Water Management, member, Rade Gregović, Director, Public Company National Parks of Montenegro, member, Zlatko Bulić PhD, Director, Republican Nature Protection Agency, member, representative of NGO Green Home” Nataša Duraković, observer, representative of NGO “Zeleni Crne Gore” Saša Drljević, observer, representative of NGO “Centar za zaštitu i proučavanje ptica” Darko Saveljić, observer and Jelena Rabrenović, senior advisor in the Ministry of Tourism and Environmental Protection, Project coordinator. The Strategy was formulated based on previous projects results: (i) “Biodiversity Study of Montenegro” from March 2008 (process led by Vasilije Bušković MSc, Leader of the Team for Development of the Study), (ii) its Summary (prepared by Vasilije Bušković MSc) which was presented at the 9th Conference of the Contracting Parties to CBD in Bonn, Germany, in May 2008 and (iii) “Country Study” –Biodiversity Study of Montenegro from October 2008 (process led by Nigel Varty PhD, UNDP consultant, with the assistance of Marija Vugdelić Phd), as well as other official documents relevant for issues covered by the Strategy. The following specialists gave contributions in their specialist areas for the above mentioned studies: Professor Vukić Pulević, Coordinator for flora, Danijela Stešević MSc, botanist, Danka Petrović MSc, botanist, Snežana Vuksanović MSc, botanist, Sead Hadžiablahović, botanist, Vesna Mačić MSc, botanist, specialist for sea vascular flora, Jelena Rakočević PhD, algologist, specialist for freshwater algal flora, Snežana Dragićević, PhD, specialist for moss, Gordana Kasom MSc, specialist for funghi, Žarko Vučinić, BSc in Forestry, Ondrej Vizi, Coordinator for Fauna, Jelena Simićević, mammalogist, specialist for mammals, Lidija Polović MSc, herpetology, Danilo Mrdak MSc, ichtiologist (specialist for freshwater ichtiofauna), Aleksandar Joksimović PhD, ichtiologist (specialist for marine ichtiofauna), Dragan Roganović PhD, specialist for forest pests, Slavica Kašćelan MSc, specialist for sea echinodermata, Vladimir Pešić PhD, specialist for invertebrates, Božidarka Marković PhD, specialist for animal agrobiodiversity, Nataša Mirecki PhD, specialist for plant agrobiodiversity, Slavica Pavlović, advisor for fishery in the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Water Management, Aleksandra Ivanović MSc, head of the Sector for Sustainable Development of the Public Company Public Maritime Domain, Zlatko Bulic MSc, Director of the Republican Nature Protection Agency, Jack Delf, travel agency Black Mountain, Montenegro and Kirsi Hyveavinen, CIM Advisor for Tourism, Ministry for Spatial Planning and Environment. 2 CONTENTS 1. Introduction 1. 1. Bases for adoption of the National Biodiversity Strategy with the Action Plan ...............................1 1. 2. Requirements of the Convention on Biological Diversity.................................................................1 1. 3. Conditions for development of Biodiversity Study of Montenegro and the National Biodiversity Strategy with the Action Plan...................................................................................................................2 2. Basic principles and objectives of the Strategy.............................................................................3 2. 1. Basic principles of the Strategy.......................................................................................................3 2. 2. Strategy objectives......................................................................................................................... 3 2. 3. Period of Strategy validity............................................................................................................... 4 2. 4. General conditions for implementation of the Strategy and the Action Plan ................................................................................................................................................................ 4 3. The state and review of biological diversity.................................................................................. 7 3. 1. General assessment of the biological diversity.............................................................................. 7 Review of biological diversity .................................................................................................... 7 3. 2. Ecosystems diversity..................................................................................................................... 8 3. 3. Diversity of species....................................................................................................................... 15 3. 4. Centres of biodiversity.................................................................................................................. 18 3. 5. Agrobiodiversity ........................................................................................................................... 20 3. 6. Information and sources of data on biological diversity................................................................ 21 4. Protection of biological diversity in priority areas of action...................................................... 23 4. 1. Protection of biological diversity in situ ........................................................................................ 23 Protected natural resources ................................................................................................... 23 Protection of species, ecosystems and habitats ..................................................................... 25 4. 2. Protection of biological diversity ex situ........................................................................................ 26 5. Forms of sustainable uses of biological diversity/natural resources....................................... 27 5. 1. Sustainable use of natural resources and “ecosystem services”......……….……………………... 27 5. 2. Economic sectors using biological diversity/ natural resources ………………………………….... 27 Agriculture ………………………………………………………………………………………........ 27 Forestry ……………………………………………………………………….…………………....... 28 Hunting ……………………………………………………………………………………………..... 29 Marine and freshwater fishery and sport fishing...…………………………....…………..……... 29 Collection of medicinal, aromatic and wild plant, foods and animals ………………….…………………………………………………………………..……................... 30 Genetically modified organisms (GMOS) ............................................................................... 31 Nature-based tourism ………………………………………………………………..……............. 31 Ecological tax................…………………………………………………………………………...... 31 5. 3. Non-economic values of biodiversity ……………………………………………………………........ 32 5.4. Equitable sharing of benefits arising from utilization of genetic resources ………………............. 32 5. 5. Sustainability of the use biological resources in Montenegro ...……………………………........... 32 5.6. Connection of gender equality and poverty with biodiversity ........................................................ 33 6. Issues of particular interest for the protection of biodiversity and its sustainable use……………………........................................................................................................................... 35 6. 1. Tourism and protection of biological diversity ...…………………………………..…………………. 35 6. 2. Spatial planning and protection of biodiversity .......………………………………..……………..… 35 6. 3. Major infrastrucutral interventions and protection of biodiversity ...……………..….…………….. 36 6. 4. Assessment of impact on biodiversity/nature/environment ..................................……....………. 36 6. 5. Legald and institutional framework for the protection of biodiversity ............……………..……... 37 7. Threats and factors of threatening to biodiversity ..................................................................... 39 7. 1. Threatened habitats, flora and fauna and agro-biodiversity ..........................…............................39 7. 2. Major threats to biological diversity ............................................................................................. 39 7. 3. Major reasons which lead to loss of biodiversity ........................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • WWF Adria Implements the Project: Protected Areas for Nature And
    Protected Areas for Nature and People – NP Durmitor, Montenegro © Martin Šolar, WWF Adria FACTSHEET 2016 WWF ADRIA IMPLEMENTS THE PROJECT: Protected Areas for Project Title: Nature and People Protected Areas for Nature and People, PA4NP The purpose of the project “Protected Areas for Nature and People”, implemented by WWF Adria since October 2015, is sustainable use of natural resources in the Region: Albania, Bosnia Dinaric Arc region as a foundation for the socio-economic development. To that and Herzegovina, Croatia, end, WWF, together with its partners, will strive to achieve the following targets: Kosovo*, Macedonia, • To introduce examples of how protected areas can generate social Montenegro, Slovenia and economic benefits in cooperation with the local community, and Serbia • To improve cooperation between the protected areas Duration: and the local community in the entire region, October 2015 – • To enhance cooperation between WWF and its partners on the one October 2019 side and decision-makers and those who have impact on them on the other side at the national level. Donor and Value: Swedish International Development WWF will use the examples of socio-economic benefits of well-managed parks, as Cooperation Agency (Sida), well as argumentation and information required for decision-making to encourage 4,200,000 EUR decision-makers from 8 countries in the region to deliver on their promises made under the “Big Win for Dinaric Arc”, a document they adopted in 2013. This is WWF’s contribution with the aim of achieving the targets
    [Show full text]
  • Nature Protection in the Legislative Framework in Montenegro
    13th COUNCIL OF EUROPE MEETING OF THE WORKSHOPS FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE EUROPEAN LANDSCAPE CONVENTION “Territories of the future, landscape identification and assessment: an exercise in democracy” Nature Protection in the legislative framework in Montenegro Marina Spahic, Directorate of Nature Protection General Directorate for Environmental Protection and Climate Change Legislation • The activity of nature protection in Montenegro is based on the : Law on Nature Protection ("Official Gazette of Montenegro", 51/08) Law on National Parks ("Official Gazette of Montenegro", 56/09). Draft Law on Amendments to the Law on Nature Protection was adopted by the Government on session held on 28 June 2012, which is now in the parliamentary procedure. • Draft Law on National Parks • Institutional framework • Ministry of Sustainable Development and Tourism • Environmental Protection Agency • Public Enterprise National Parks of Montenegro Clasification of protected areas • Special nature reserves • National Parks • Regional Parks⁄Parks of nature • Monuments of nature • Protected habitat • Landscapes of special natural characteristics (article 43) Declaration • Study of protection for the area • Parliament of Montenegro • Goverment of Montenegro • Local goverments • Register of Protected Areas Protected areas National parks – 7,77 % -Skadar lake-40.000 ha -Lovcen-6.400 ha -Durmitor-33.895 ha -Biogradska Gora- 5.400 ha -Prokletije-16.038 ha Monuments of Nature-0.987% Nature reserves- 0.047% Landscapes of special natural characteristic0.025% Territories
    [Show full text]
  • 4 Montenegro: Wild Beauty
    43 Montenegro: Wild 4 Beauty Christian Baumgartner, Naturefriends International Synopsis and Learning Outcomes Despite tremendous pressures for rapid development of coastal tourism, mainly fuelled by foreign investment, the Ministry of Tourism together with its National Tourism Organi- sation (NTO) have “shifted the focus from traditional package tour holidays in coastal regions to creating a higher-yield tourism product based on nature tourism [and regional traditional culture]. This includes the promotion of local, authentic restaurants and hotel facilities, as well as the establishment of well-connected bicycle trails” (Montenegro National Tourism Organisation, 2010). This case focuses on a 10-year development project in the region of the Biogradska Gora National Park in the north-eastern part of the country. A slow step-by-step development based on trust building, cooperation between five communities and the National Park and integration of regional stakeholders has resulted in sustainable tourism products that are successful in the international, mainly German-speaking market. Naturefriends International (NFI) played an important role in the starting phase of the project in 1999 together with the country office of theOECD. Later on the tourism devel- opment project was financed by the AustrianDevelopment Agency (ADA) and imple- mented by the ÖAR (Österreichische Arbeitsgemeinschaft für eigenständige Region- alentwicklung / Austrian Association for Endogenous Regional Development), while the author and NFI colleagues were continuously involved as experts, moderators or within monitoring processes. The case of the development of the Bjelasica-Komovi region, with the central national park Biogradska Gora, shows that sustainable tourism development should have an eye on overall sustainable regional development, linking its specific products to regional resources and empowering regional stakeholders to gain benefit from the tourism devel- opment.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report
    Ministry of Tourism and Environment SUSTAINABLE TOURISM INDICATORS AND DESTINATION MANAGEMENT Regional Workshop Kolašin, Montenegro, 25-27 April 2007 FINAL REPORT CONTENTS Foreword by Mr. Predrag Nenezic, Minister of Tourism and Environment of Montenegro 1 INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................... 3 2 SUSTAINABLE TOURISM IN MONTENEGRO AND THE BJELASICA AND KOMOVI REGION ........................................................................................... 5 3 WORKSHOP PRESENTATIONS AND VISITS...................................................... 11 4 METHODOLOGICAL APPROACH ........................................................................ 17 5 IDENTIFICATION OF ISSUES AND INDICATORS FOR SUSTAINABLE TOURISM IN BJELASICA AND KOMOVI.............................................................. 21 6 MONITORING AND MEASUREMENT PROCESSES ........................................... 41 7 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE WORKSHOP............ 43 8 BASELINE INDICATORS FOR TOURISM DEVELOPMENT IN THE NORTHERN MOUNTAIN REGION OF MONTENEGRO ...................................... 45 ANNEX A: FORMS............................................................................................................ 49 Form 1 - Field visit evaluation sheet ............................................................................. 49 Form 2 - Situation analysis worksheet .......................................................................... 51 Form 3 - Sustainability
    [Show full text]
  • Cephalopoda: Sepiolidae)
    Helgol Mar Res (2011) 65:43–49 DOI 10.1007/s10152-010-0199-y ORIGINAL ARTICLE Spawning strategy in Atlantic bobtail squid Sepiola atlantica (Cephalopoda: Sepiolidae) Marcelo Rodrigues · Manuel E. Garcí · Jesús S. Troncoso · Ángel Guerra Received: 20 November 2009 / Revised: 18 March 2010 / Accepted: 19 March 2010 / Published online: 6 April 2010 © Springer-Verlag and AWI 2010 Abstract This study aimed to determine the spawning Introduction strategy in the Atlantic bobtail squid Sepiola atlantica, in order to add new information to the knowledge of its repro- Cephalopods have highly variable and complex life history ductive strategy. A total of 12 females that spawned in traits related to reproduction (Hanlon and Messenger 1996). aquaria were examined. Characteristics of the reproductive Information on reproductive strategies may lead to a better traits and egg clutches were similar to those of other known understanding of the evolution of life histories, both repro- Sepiolidae. Clutch size varied from 31 up to 115 eggs. ductive strategies and life cycles being genetic adaptations Females of this species had incorporated up to 1.58 times of to optimize the use of ecological niches in direct competi- their body weight into laid eggs. The size of laid eggs tion with other species and in response to environmental showed a positive correlation with maternal body size, sup- conditions (Rocha et al. 2001). The patterns of ovulation porting the idea that female size is a determinant of egg and spawning are basic elements to characterize cephalo- size. Our data suggest that S. atlantica is an intermittent ter- pod reproductive patterns.
    [Show full text]
  • 7. Index of Scientific and Vernacular Names
    Cephalopods of the World 249 7. INDEX OF SCIENTIFIC AND VERNACULAR NAMES Explanation of the System Italics : Valid scientific names (double entry by genera and species) Italics : Synonyms, misidentifications and subspecies (double entry by genera and species) ROMAN : Family names ROMAN : Scientific names of divisions, classes, subclasses, orders, suborders and subfamilies Roman : FAO names Roman : Local names 250 FAO Species Catalogue for Fishery Purposes No. 4, Vol. 1 A B Acanthosepion pageorum .....................118 Babbunedda ................................184 Acanthosepion whitleyana ....................128 bandensis, Sepia ..........................72, 138 aculeata, Sepia ............................63–64 bartletti, Blandosepia ........................138 acuminata, Sepia..........................97,137 bartletti, Sepia ............................72,138 adami, Sepia ................................137 bartramii, Ommastrephes .......................18 adhaesa, Solitosepia plangon ..................109 bathyalis, Sepia ..............................138 affinis, Sepia ...............................130 Bathypolypus sponsalis........................191 affinis, Sepiola.......................158–159, 177 Bathyteuthis .................................. 3 African cuttlefish..............................73 baxteri, Blandosepia .........................138 Ajia-kouika .................................. 115 baxteri, Sepia.............................72,138 albatrossae, Euprymna ........................181 belauensis, Nautilus .....................51,53–54
    [Show full text]
  • Five Aquatic Oligochaeta Species New for the Fauna of Montenegro
    Turk J Zool 2011; 35(1): 119-121 © TÜBİTAK Short Communication doi:10.3906/zoo-0903-12 Five aquatic Oligochaeta species new for the fauna of Montenegro Aleksandra JABŁOŃSKA1,*, Vladimir PEŠIĆ2 1Department of Invertebrate Zoology & Hydrobiology, University of Łódź, Banacha 12/16, PL-90-237 Łódź - POLAND 2Department of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, University of Crna Gora, Cetinjski put b.b., 81000 Podgorica, Crna Gora - MONTENEGRO Received: 09.03.2009 Abstract: Five species of aquatic Oligochaeta new for Montenegro were recorded from various types of fresh waters. Marionina argentea (Michaelsen, 1889) was reported from a subterranean stream. Propappus volki Michaelsen, 1916, Rhyacodrilus coccineus (Vejdovský, 1876), and Cognettia sphagnetorum (Vejdovský, 1877) were found in epigean streams. Haplotaxis gordioides (Hartmann, 1821) appeared in both subterranean and epigean streams. The list of aquatic oligochaetes from Montenegro now encompasses 39 species. Key words: Aquatic oligochaetes, Montenegro, new records, faunistics Faunistic data of aquatic oligochaetes from 4 research stations (Figure) by hand netting. In Montenegro come from a few papers by Černosvitov Djakovića cave (station 1) located in Grahovo (1931), Hrabě (1958), Karaman (1973), and Jacobi (42°39′21″N, 18°40′36″E; 7.09.2000, 7.02.2002) the (1981a, 1981b). Kerovec and Mršić (1981) in their samples were taken from the subterranean stream. In Catalogus Faunae Yugoslaviae mentioned only 16 Lepenac stream (station 2) near Mojkovac aquatic Oligochaeta species from Montenegro. (42°57′50″N, 19°34′57″E; 30.09.2006) and Bistrica Janković and Jakovčev (1986) as well as Jakovčev et al. stream (station 3) in Crkvine near Kolašin (43°7′7″N, (1995) enriched that list with 12 species, while 19°20′25″E; 30.09.2006) the samples were collected Jabłońska and Pešić (2006) added another 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Sepietta Neglecta Naef, 1916 Fig
    176 FAO Species Catalogue for Fishery Purposes No. 4, Vol. 1 Sepietta neglecta Naef, 1916 Fig. 255 Sepietta neglecta Naef, 1916, Pubblicazioni della Stazione Zoologica di Napoli, 1: 9 [type locality: Tyrrhenian Sea]. Frequent Synonyms: None. Misidentifications: None. FAO Names: En – Elegant bobtail squid; Fr – Sépiole élégante; Sp – Sepieta elegante. bursa copulatrix (after Naef, 1923) dorsal arms of male mantle cavity of female (hectocotylus) Fig. 255 Sepietta neglecta Diagnostic Features: Fins rounded, bluntly pointed laterally rather than curved; short, do not exceed length of mantle anteriorly or posteriorly. Hectocotylus present, left dorsal arm modified: proximal end with fleshy pad formed from enlarged and/or fused sucker pedicels; copulatory apparatus a dome-shaped lobe medially and short, pointed, horn with smaller papilla between these; horn of copulatory apparatus slightly recurved, but does not form a small hole; base of hectocotylus proximal to fleshy pad with 4 normal suckers (not modified); dorsal row of suckers distal to copulatory apparatus with first 3 or 4 suckers markedly enlarged; arm broad, spoon-like. Tentacles very thin, delicate. Club with 16 uniform-sized suckers in transverse rows. Female bursa copulatrix large (extends posteriorly beyond gill insertion). Light organs absent. Size: Up to 33 mm mantle length. Geographical Distribution: Northeastern Atlantic and Mediterranean Sea: southern coast of Norway and Orkney Islands to Morocco; eastern and western Mediterranean Sea (Ligurian Sea, Strait of Sicily, Adriatic Sea, north Aegan Sea, Sea of Marmara and Levantine Sea) (Fig. 256). Habitat and Biology: Sepietta neglecta lives preferentially on muddy substrates at depths ranging between 25 and 475 m. It is often associated with Rossia macrosoma and Sepietta oweniana.Itspawns continuously throughout the year.
    [Show full text]
  • Natura Montenegrina, Podgorica, 7(1): 5-24
    NATURA MONTENEGRINA, PODGORICA, 7(1): 5-24 TWO NEW SPECIES OF THE Crematogaster scutellaris GROUP, Crematogaster gordani, sp. nov. AND C. montenigrinus sp. nov. (INSECTA: HYMENOPTERA: FORMICIDAE) FROM CRNA GORA (MONTENEGRO) WITH THE KEY OF THIS GROUP FROM SOUTHERN EUROPE. Marko KARAMAN Natural History Museum of Montenegro, P.O.Box 374, 81000 Podgorica, Crna Gora (Montenegro). E-mail: markoka@cg.yu SYNOPSIS Keywords: A new species, Crematogaster gordani sp. nov. (Insecta: Hymenoptera, Hymenoptera: Formicidae) is described from Crna Gora (Montenegro), Formicidae, Balkan Peninsula. This species belongs to C. scutellaris group of Crematogaster, species caracterized by presence of keel on alitrunk and by new species, trapezoidal petiolus. C. gordani can be distingueshed easily by yellow color of workers and males. taxonomy, The second taxa of the same group, formerly known as Crna Gora, Crematogaster scutellaris schmidti atratula Zimmermann, 1934, from Montenegro. Boka Kotorska, is recognized as a distinct species, redescribed and figured here under the name Crematogaster montenigrinus sp. nov. [in accordance with the ICZN rules article 23.3.5; 45.5.1]. Key to the worker caste of C. scutellaris complex from southern Europe is given. SINOPSIS Ključne riječi: Hymenoptera, DVIJE NOVE VRSTE Crematogaster scutellaris GRUPE, Formicidae, Crematogaster gordani, sp. nov. i C. montenigrinus sp. nov. (Insecta: Hymenoptera: Formicidae) IZ CRNE GORE (MONTENEGRO) SA Crematogaster, KLJUČEM ZA RADNIKE OVE GRUPE VRSTA U JUŽNOJ EVROPI nova vrsta, taksonomija, Nova vrsta iz Crne Gore, Crematogaster gordani sp. nov. Crna Gora, (Insecta: Hymenoptera: Formicidae) je opisana. Ova vrsta pripada C. Montenegro. scutellaris grupi vrsta koju karakteriše kobilica na toraksu i trapezoidni petiolus. Vrsta C.
    [Show full text]
  • Small Grants Update (Montenegro), February – June 20151
    SMALL GRANTS UPDATE (MONTENEGRO), FEBRUARY – JUNE 20151 The implementation of the project activities in Montenegro is proceeding according to plan, although some delays were experienced in Bijelo Polje, where implementation could not start before the local government was cleared out of bankruptcy. Tivat local government organized an awareness raising campaign and identified premises for the new Information Center; Plav local government purchased and installed simultaneous translation equipment to be used during the municipal assembly sessions and has begun the translation of the relevant municipal documents. In addition, Kotor local government issued three magazines under the project and promotion activities are planned for the forthcoming period. JP Minority Project Secretariat has noted that in some cases (Kotor) the respective local NGOs are very much engaged in the planning and implementation of the small grants, and thus driving the process, and the respective local governments are taking a much more modest role. 1 Please note that the project implementation in all municipalities in Montenegro (except for Bijelo Polje) was delayed due to the unresolved issue of VAT eligibility. After failing in their efforts to exempt themselves from the VAT, the selected municipalities agreed to cover the VAT costs from their own funds. 1 Bijelo Polje - Local Self-Government Field: Culture Key minority engaged: Bosniaks The project aims to promote and affirm the culture and traditions of the Bosniak national minority with the active participation of civil servants and the local self-government bodies. The project will support scientific and expert meetings that deal with international and national mechanisms for the protection of national minorities and Bosniak contemporary literature.
    [Show full text]
  • Municipal Assembly, Budget, General Information, Public Procurement, Public Discussions and Public Competitions
    1 TRANSPARENCY INDEX OF MONTENEGRIN MUNICIPALITIES Podgorica, 2020 TRANSPARENCY INDEX OF MONTENEGRIN MUNICIPALITIES Publisher: Centar za građansko obrazovanje (CGO) Editor: Daliborka Uljarević Lead author: Mira Popović Co-authors: Maja Marinović Ana Nenezić Research Associate: Vasilije Radulović Design and Production: Centar za građansko obrazovanje (CGO) Print: 170 primjeraka The report is part of the project “Let’s put corruption in the museum!” implemented by the Centre for Civic Education (CCE) in partnership with NGO Centre for Monitoring and Research (CeMI), NGO Bonum from Pljevlja, NGO UL-Info from Ulcinj and NGO Za Druga from Petrovac, in cooperation with the Ministry of Public Administration and the Agency for Prevention Corruption (APC), funded by the European Union with co-financing from the Ministry of Public Administration. The content of this publication is the sole responsibility of the CCE and CEMI and in no manner can it be interpreted as an official position of the European Union or the Ministry of Public Administration. SADRŽAJ Introduction 6 Methodology 7 General assessment of the state of transparency of municipalities in Montenegro 11 How transparent are Montenegrin municipalities? 16 • Andrijevica 17 • Bar 20 • Berane 23 • Bijelo Polje 26 • Budva 29 • Cetinje 32 • Danilovgrad 35 • Golubovci 38 • Gusinje 41 • Herceg Novi 44 • Kolašin 47 • Kotor 50 • Mojkovac 53 • Nikšić 56 • Petnjica 59 • Plav 62 • Pljevlja 65 • Plužine 68 • Podgorica 71 • Rožaje 74 • Šavnik 77 • Tivat 80 • Tuzi 83 • Ulcinj 86 • Žabljak 89 Research 92 Final remarks 101 6 INTRODUCTION Fight against corruption requires a multidisciplinary, continuous and multifaceted approach, and one of the preconditions is a high degree of transparency in the work of public sector bodies.
    [Show full text]
  • Cover Page RZS.Cdr
    REPUBLIKA CRNA GORA Zavod za statistiku REPUBLIC OF MONTENEGRO Statistical Office Popis stanovništva, domaæinstava i stanova u 2003. S T A N O V N I Š T V O NACIONALNA ILI ETNIÈKA PRIPADNOST Podaci po naseljima i opštinama Census of Population, Households and Dwellings 2003 P O P U L A T I O N NATIONAL OR ETHNIC AFFILIATION Data by settlements and municipalities 11 Podgorica, septembar 2004. REPUBLIKA CRNA GORA REPUBLIC OF MONTENEGRO Zavod za statistiku Statistical Office Popis stanovništva, domaćinstava i stanova u 2003. S T A N O V N I Š T V O NACIONALNA ILI ETNIČKA PRIPADNOST Podaci po naseljima i opštinama Census of Population, Households and Dwellings 2003 P O P U L A T I O N NATIONAL OR ETHNIC AFFILIATION Data by settlements and municipalities 11 Podgorica, septembar 2004. Izdaje: Published by: Zavod za statistiku Statistical Office of the Republic of Republike Crne Gore Montenegro IV Proleterske 2, Podgorica IV Proleterske 2, Podgorica Za izdavača: For the publisher: Ilija Stanišić, Director Ilija Stanišić, Director Glavni i odgovorni urednik: Editor-in-chief: Rajko Laković Rajko Laković Štampa: Printed by: Štamparija: Printing firm: Tiraž: Copies printed: 400 primjeraka 400 P R E D G O V O R U ovoj knjizi Zavod za statistiku Crne Gore objavljuje konačne rezultate popisa o nacionalnoj ili etničkoj pripadnosti stalnog stanovništva Republike Crne Gore, prema stanju na dan 31.oktobra 2003.godine. Podaci su iskazani po opštinama i naseljima, i to prema važećem administrativno-teritorijalnom stanju na dan 1.januar 2003.godine. U okviru Republike navedene su opštine prema azbučnom redosledu i tipu naselja, a u okviru svake opštine sva njena naselja prema azbučnom redosledu.
    [Show full text]