DOCSLIB.ORG

Arizona State Freight Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Arizona State Freight Plan Arizona State Freight Plan This document is Arizona’s five-year State Freight Plan and fulfills the federal requirements for state freight plans embodied in the Fixing America’s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act. This Freight Plan, together with a series of technical working papers that informed development of the Freight Plan, also provides the Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) with a base of decision making knowledge and strategies to increase the prominence of freight in ADOT planning and programming. Acknowledgements ADOT thanks an outstanding CPCS (CPCS Transcom Inc.) team for its exemplary efforts in producing this Freight Plan. ADOT also expresses gratitude to the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) and Freight Advisory Committee (FAC) for valuable advice throughout the development of the plan. Michael Demers, though no longer employed at ADOT, is acknowledged for managing the Plan developed for ADOT, while he served as ADOT Freight Planner. Heidi Yaqub, ADOT’s current Freight Program Manager is also recognized for her efforts in completing the Final Plan document. The Arizona State Freight Plan was prepared under the direction of the Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) by: CPCS In association with: HDR Engineering, Inc. American Transportation Research Institute, Inc. Elliott D. Pollack & Company Dr. Chris Caplice (MIT) Plan*ET Communities PLLC (Leslie Dornfeld, FAICP) Gill V. Hicks and Associates, Inc. Contact Questions and comments on this plan can be directed to: Charla Glendening, AICP Assistant Manager of Planning and Programming 602-712-7376 www.azdot.gov FINAL | Arizona State Freight Plan Table of Contents 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 1 Purpose of the Freight Plan ...................................................................................................... 1 The Economic Context for the Arizona State Freight Plan ....................................................... 2 Freight Plan Development Phases............................................................................................ 3 FAST Act Requirements for Freight Plans ................................................................................ 4 Freight Plan Development Process .......................................................................................... 5 2 Context of the Freight Plan within the ADOT Planning Process .................................................... 6 Linking Federal Requirements to State Planning Processes .................................................... 6 Statewide Long-Range Transportation Plan ............................................................................. 7 Planning to Programming Link ................................................................................................. 8 3 Freight Plan Goals, Objectives, Policies, and Strategies.............................................................. 12 Vision ...................................................................................................................................... 12 Goals and Objectives .............................................................................................................. 13 Relationship to National Freight Policy Goals ........................................................................ 15 Policies .................................................................................................................................... 18 Strategies ................................................................................................................................ 18 4 Arizona’s Freight System ........................................................................................................... 23 Freight System Overview ....................................................................................................... 23 Freight Highway System ......................................................................................................... 25 Freight Rail System ................................................................................................................. 27 Air Cargo System .................................................................................................................... 30 Pipeline System ...................................................................................................................... 30 Borders and International Freight Gateways ......................................................................... 30 Freight Clusters ....................................................................................................................... 33 5 Freight System Condition and Performance .............................................................................. 34 Introduction: Freight System Condition and Performance .................................................... 34 Freight Performance Measures .............................................................................................. 36 Overall Performance .............................................................................................................. 44 6 Economic Context of Freight Movement in Arizona ................................................................... 45 Wider Economic Trends ......................................................................................................... 45 Role of Freight in the Arizona Economy ................................................................................. 46 7 Trends Affecting Arizona Freight Transportation ....................................................................... 56 Summary of Trends Affecting Arizona’s Freight Transportation System ............................... 56 Potential Future Scenarios ..................................................................................................... 60 FINAL | Arizona State Freight Plan Implication of Trends on Needs and Improvement Priorities................................................ 63 8 Strengths, Weaknesses, Needs, and Issues ................................................................................ 65 Strengths of the Arizona Freight Transportation System ...................................................... 65 Weaknesses of the Arizona Freight Transportation System .................................................. 66 Policy Responses .................................................................................................................... 68 9 Prioritization of Needs and Project Identification ...................................................................... 70 Prioritization Approach .......................................................................................................... 70 10 Arizona Freight System Improvement Strategy........................................................................ 80 Strategic Considerations ........................................................................................................ 80 Improvement Strategies ......................................................................................................... 81 Critical Freight Networks ........................................................................................................ 84 11 Implementation Plan .............................................................................................................. 90 Approach to Implementation ................................................................................................. 90 Priority Projects and Implementation .................................................................................... 90 Funding Sources ..................................................................................................................... 92 Implementation Strategies ..................................................................................................... 95 Appendix 1 Arizona Freight Facts ........................................................................................... 99 Volumes and Value of Freight by Mode ......................................................................................... 99 Top Trading Partners ..................................................................................................................... 100 Top Commodities .......................................................................................................................... 102 Appendix 2 MAG and PAG Critical Urban Freight Corridors ................................................... 106 Appendix 3 Acronyms and Abbreviations ............................................................................. 110 FINAL | Arizona State Freight Plan 1Introduction Key Messages The State Freight Plan defines immediate and long-range investment priorities and policies that will generate the greatest return for Arizona’s economy. It also fulfills federal requirements for state freight plans embodied in the Fixing America's Surface Transportation (FAST) Act. Developed from 2015 to 2017, the Arizona State Freight Plan consolidates the strategies identified through its 11-phase development. The Freight Plan will serve as a guide to the strategies and actions that increase the prominence of freight in planning and programming statewide. Purpose of the Freight Plan The aims of the Arizona State Freight Plan (Freight Plan) are twofold:
Load more

Recommended publications
  • I-11 Coalition for Sonoran Desert Protection Letter to ADOT, July 2016
    July 8, 2016 Interstate 11 Tier 1 EIS Study Team c/o ADOT Communications 1655 W. Jackson St., MD 126F Phoenix, AZ 85007 RE: Scoping Comments on the Interstate 11 Tier 1 Environmental Impact Statement, Nogales to Wickenburg To Whom It May Concern: The Coalition for Sonoran Desert Protection appreciates the opportunity to provide scoping comments for the Interstate 11 Tier 1 Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), Nogales to Wickenburg. We submit the enclosed comments on behalf of the Coalition for Sonoran Desert Protection, founded in 1998 and comprised of 34 environmental and community groups working in Pima County, Arizona. Our mission is to achieve the long-term conservation of biological diversity and ecological function of the Sonoran Desert through comprehensive land-use planning, with primary emphasis on Pima County’s Sonoran Desert Conservation Plan. We achieve this mission by advocating for: 1) protecting and conserving Pima County’s most biologically rich areas, 2) directing development to appropriate land, and 3) requiring appropriate mitigation for impacts to habitat and wildlife species. In summary, our scoping comments highlight the need for further evaluation of the purpose and need for this project and major environmental impacts that should be considered statewide and particularly in Pima County as this study area is evaluated. Specifically, potential environmental impacts in Pima County include impacts to federal lands such as Saguaro National Park, Ironwood Forest National Monument, and the Bureau of Reclamation’s Central
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report, Volume 1 | I-19: San Xavier Road to Interstate 10 Study
    FINAL DESIGN CONCEPT REPORT (Volume 1 of 2) I-19 San Xavier Road to I-10 Project No. 019 PM 057 H5105 01L Federal Aid Reference Number: 019-A (014) ADOT Contract No. 04-34 August 23, 2012 Prepared For the Arizona Department of Transportation Tucson District – Pima County PREPARED BY: 1860 East River Road, Suite 300 Tucson, Arizona 85718 FINAL DESIGN CONCEPT REPORT I-19 San Xavier Road to I-10 Project No. 019 PM 057 H5105 01L Federal Aid Reference Number: 019-A (014) ADOT Contract No. 04-34 August 23, 2012 Prepared For the Arizona Department of Transportation Tucson District – Pima County Prepared By: 1860 East River Road, Suite 300 Tucson, Arizona 85718 Final Design Concept Report I-19 San Xavier Road to I-10 1.5 Agency and Public Scoping ....................................................................................... 26 Table of Contents 1.5.1 Agency Scoping .................................................................................................. 26 1.5.2 Public Scoping .................................................................................................... 27 Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................. 1 2.0 Traffic And Crash Data .............................................................................................................. 29 Environmental Mitigation Measures.................................................................................................... 8 2.1 2001 Conditions .......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Route Restriction Information: Table 4
    R17-6-412, Table 4 – Updated April 06, 2021 Table 4. Permanent Highway Restrictions, Requirements, Conditions, and Allowances For “Transport Subject To” requirements see end of document. Route Restriction Location Transport Subject to: Height Length Width Weight (in lbs) (MP = Milepost) Escort requirements: F = front escort, R = rear escort, F/R = front and rear escort, and LE = law enforcement escort Interstate 8 MP 0.00 (California State R17-6-405; R17-6-406; Over 14’ - 16’ = R Line) to MP 21.06 (Dome R17-6-408; R17-6-409 Valley Road TI) Interstate 8 MP 21.06 Westbound (Dome R17-6-405; R17-6-406; 15’ 11” Over 14’ - 16’ = R Valley Road TI Underpass - R17-6-408; R17-6-409 Structure 1325) Interstate 8 MP 21.06 (Dome Valley R17-6-405; R17-6-406; Over 14’ - 16’ = R Road TI) to MP 30.80 R17-6-408; R17-6-409 (Avenue 29E - Wellton TI) Interstate 8 MP 30.80 Westbound R17-6-405; R17-6-406; 15’ 11” Over 14’ - 16’ = R (Avenue 29E - Wellton R17-6-408; R17-6-409 Underpass - Structure 1332) Interstate 8 MP 30.80 (Avenue 29E - R17-6-405; R17-6-406; Over 14’ - 16’ = R Wellton TI) to MP 144.55 R17-6-408; R17-6-409 (Vekol Valley Road TI) Interstate 8 MP 144.55 (Vekol Valley R17-6-405; R17-6-406; 15’ 11” Over 14’ - 16’ = R Road Underpass - Structure R17-6-408; R17-6-409 550) Interstate 8 MP 144.55 (Vekol Valley R17-6-405; R17-6-406; Over 14’ - 16’ = R Road TI) to MP 151.70 R17-6-408; R17-6-409 (Junction SR 84) Interstate 8 MP 151.70 Eastbound R17-6-405; R17-6-406; 15’ 10” Over 14’ - 16’ = R (Junction SR 84 Underpass - R17-6-408; R17-6-409 Structure 1063)
    [Show full text]
  • Senate Concurrent Resolution 1012
    Senate Engrossed State of Arizona Senate Fifty-second Legislature First Regular Session 2015 SENATE CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 1012 A CONCURRENT RESOLUTION SUPPORTING THE ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION'S COMMENTS TO THE FEDERAL DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION IN RESPONSE TO THE PROPOSED DESIGNATION OF THE PRIMARY FREIGHT NETWORK. (TEXT OF BILL BEGINS ON NEXT PAGE) - i - S.C.R. 1012 1 Whereas, the Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) submitted 2 comments to the federal Department of Transportation (DOT) in response to the 3 proposed designation of the Primary Freight Network (PFN) that highlighted 4 problems with the proposal and provided recommendations for improvement; and 5 Whereas, the federal legislation "Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st 6 Century Act" (MAP-21) calls for the United States Secretary of Transportation 7 to designate up to 27,000 miles on existing interstate and other roadways, 8 with a possible addition of 3,000 miles in the future, as a PFN to help 9 states strategically direct resources toward improving freight movement; and 10 Whereas, the Federal Register notice identifies more than 41,000 miles 11 of comprehensive, connected roadway that a Federal Highway Administration 12 (FHWA) analysis shows would be necessary to transport goods efficiently on 13 highways throughout the nation to make up the PFN; and 14 Whereas, the PFN proposal is based on the origins and destination of 15 freight movement, shipment tonnage and values, truck traffic volumes and 16 population; and 17 Whereas, under MAP-21, the PFN
    [Show full text]
  • 1144 E. Mcdowell Rd
    OfferingOffering Memorandum Memorandum > Owner-User/Redevelopment > For Sale > Investment Opportunity 1144 E. McDowell Rd. PHOENIX, ARIZONA 85006 PRESENTED BY COLLIERS INTERNATIONAL Philip Wurth, CCIM 8360 E. Raintree Dr. Suite 130 Executive Vice President Scottsdale, AZ 85260 480 655 3310 480 596 9000 [email protected] www.colliers.com/greaterphoenix TABLEOffering OF CONTENTS Memorandum > For Sale > Investment Opportunity 1 2 3 4 5 INVESTMENT PROPERTY FINANCIAL LOCATION DEMOGRAPHICS SUMMARY INFORMATION ANALYSIS OVERVIEW PROJECT OVERVIEW LOCATION & AMENITIES OPERATING COSTS & AERIAL MAP CITY OF PHOENIX INVESTMENT HIGHLIGHTS SITE PLAN RENT ROLL PROJECT PHOTOS DEMOGRAPHICS FLOOR PLANS PRESENTED BY Philip Wurth, CCIM Executive Vice President 480 655 3310 [email protected] Offering Memorandum > For Sale > Investment Opportunity 1144 E. McDOWELL RD. | PHOENIX, AZ 1 INVESTMENT SUMMARY Offering Memorandum > For Sale > Investment Opportunity INVESTMENT SUMMARY>Project Overview 1144 E. McDOWELL RD. • PHOENIX, ARIZONA PRICE Overview $2,395,000.00 $82.34 | SF Colliers International is pleased to be retained as the exclusive advisor for the marketing and sale of 1144 E. McDowell Road, an approximately 29,088 square foot medical/professional office building in Phoenix, Arizona. Constructed in BUILDING SIZE 1984, the property was partially renovated in 2016. ±29,088 SF THE OPPORTUNITY 1144 E. McDowell Road sits across the street from Banner-University Medical Center; an ideal location for physicians LAND SIZE with privileges at the hospital. The four-story building includes a built-out basement and covered parking under the second floor. Employees and visitors will enjoy the building’s central location, only two miles away from the mini stack, 1.21 AC the busiest freeway interchange in Arizona, offering quick access to I-10, I-17 and SR 51.
    [Show full text]
  • View, Plans for Its Alumni
    Cover_Folding June 08 w-AD II:Cover_Foldout 5/22/08 10:43 AM Page 1 Top10 exciting things PO Box 873702, Tempe, AZ 85287-3702 happening atASU UNIVERSITY STATE ASU athletics is enjoying its most prolific year in decades. Our football team won a PAC-10 conference championship, and we have three ARIZONA national championships in track and field. The majority of our 22 sports team OF are ranked in the top 20 nationwide. Take Advantage of MAGAZINE ASU now awards almost 14,000 degrees every year, to meet Your Group Buying Power! THE Arizona’s needs for an expand- ing educated workforce. At the same time, the number of Being part of the Arizona Plans Offered to Alumni: A STROKE OF National Merit Scholars and State family has many bene ts, • Auto and Homeowners one of them being the unique National Hispanic Scholars at • Long-Term Care advantage you have when it ASU has increased eight-fold, comes to shopping for insurance. • 10-Year Term Life Meet this year’s and almost 30% of freshmen Because you are grouped with top scholars GENIUS are from the top 10% of their • Major Medical high school class. your fellow alumni, you may get • Catastrophe Major Medical lower rates than those quoted University scores big 4 Skysong opens on an individual basis. Plus, • Short-Term Medical with golf-related research, you can trust that your alumni • Disability NO. Poets sum up a association only offers the best 1 1 life’s work degree programs According to the Princeton Review, plans for its alumni.
    [Show full text]
  • Lesser-Known Areas the National Parks: Lesser-Known Areas
    The National Parks: Lesser-Known Areas The National Parks: Lesser-Known Areas Produced by the Office of Public Affairs and the Division of Publications National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Washington, D.C. 1985 National Park Service U. S. Department of the Interior As the nation's principal ment of life through outdoor conservation agency, the recreation. The Department Department of the Interior assesses our energy and has responsibility for most of mineral resources and works our nationally owned public to assure that their develop­ lands and natural resources. ment is in the best interest of This includes fostering the all our people. The Depart­ wisest use of our land and ment also has a major respon- water resources, protecting siblity for American Indian our fish and wildlife, preserv­ reservation communities and ing the environmental and for people who live in island cultural values of our national territories under United parks and historical places, States administration. and providing for the enjoy­ For sale by the Superintendent of Documents U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402 Contents Introduction 4 Maps of the National Park System 6 National Park Service Regional Offices 9 Lesser-Known Areas Listed by State 10 Index 48 Lesser-Known Parks: Doorways to Adventure Few travelers are familiar with most parks described here. Many are located away from principal highways or are relatively new to the National Park Sys­ tem. And most, but not all, are smaller than the more popular parks. Yet these sites contain nationally significant sce­ nic and cultural resources, many of com­ parable quality to the more famous parks.
    [Show full text]
  • A Total Cost of Ownership Model for Solid Oxide Fuel Cells in Combined Heat and Power and Power- Only Applications
    ERNEST ORLANDO LAWRENCE BERKELEY NATIONAL LABORATORY A Total Cost of Ownership Model for Solid Oxide Fuel Cells in Combined Heat and Power and Power- Only Applications Roberto Scataglini, Ahmad Mayyas1, Max Wei, Shuk Han Chan2, Timothy Lipman1, David Gosselin2, Anna D’Alessio2, Hanna Breunig, Whitney G. Colella3, and Brian D. James3 Environmental Energy Technologies Division December 2015 1University of California, Berkeley, Transportation Sustainability Research Center, Berkeley, California 2University of California, Berkeley, Laboratory for Manufacturing and Sustainability, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Berkeley, California 3Strategic Analysis, Inc. (SA), Energy Services Division, 4075 Wilson Blvd., Suite 200, Arlington VA 22203 This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Fuel Cells Technologies Office (FCTO) under Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Contract No. DE-AC02- 05CH11231 i DISCLAIMER This document was prepared as an account of work sponsored by the United States Government. While this document is believed to contain correct information, neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor The Regents of the University of California, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by its trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof, or The Regents of the University of California.
    [Show full text]
  • 03 Page F-304
    Page F-300 Page F-301 Page F-302 Page Page F-303 Page F-304 Online Survey Responses (Summary) Page F-305 I-11 Survey Monkey Summary of Responses: Summer 2016 Public Scoping Question 1 Please tell us what problems you experience today, or anticipate in the future, related to transportation in the Corridor Study Area that the I-11 project could address. Please rank the following in order of importance to you. (1= highest ranking [most important], 5=lowest ranking [least important]). Relieve local congestion, improve travel time and 134 reliability (reduce how long a trip will take or ensure 67 certainty of travel time) 61 46 173 Relieve regional congestion, improve travel time and 139 reliability (between Southern and Northwestern Arizona) 75 68 41 158 Improve freight travel and reliability, reducing 125 bottlenecks on existing highways 72 72 50 158 Improve local access to communities and resources 73 (parks, recreation, and tourism) 56 98 73 173 Need for a different transportation mode than what 149 exists today 53 49 49 172 Support homeland security and national defense needs 73 34 81 58 226 0 50 100 150 200 250 1 (most important) 2 3 4 5 (least important) Other desirable outcomes (open-ended response): [responses not edited for spelling, grammar, or capitalization] Freeze construction of new homes until the current commuting demands are addressed and solved. Minimal disruption of the desert environment especially in the area of the Arizona Sonoran Desert Museum and the Saguaro National Park.. Protecting what is left of the southern Arizona natural world.
    [Show full text]
  • 1- Minutes of the Maricopa
    MINUTES OF THE MARICOPA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS TRANSPORTATION POLICY COMMITTEE MEETING June 17, 2009 MAG Office, Saguaro Room Phoenix, Arizona MEMBERS ATTENDING Mayor Marie Lopez Rogers, Avondale, Mayor Jackie Meck, Buckeye Vice Chair David Scholl Councilmember Ron Aames, Peoria Mayor Elaine Scruggs, Glendale # Kent Andrews, Salt River Pima-Maricopa * Mayor Scott Smith, Mesa Indian Community # Mayor Jim Lane, Scottsdale Councilwoman Maria Baier, Phoenix * Mayor Lyn Truitt, Surprise + Councilmember Gail Barney, Queen Creek * Supervisor Max W. Wilson, Maricopa County * Stephen Beard, HDR Engineering Inc. * Felipe Zubia, State Transportation Board * Dave Berry, Swift Transportation * Vacant, Citizens Transportation Oversight Jed Billings, FNF Construction Committee Mayor James Cavanaugh, Goodyear * Mayor Boyd Dunn, Chandler OTHERS ATTENDING * Mayor Hugh Hallman, Tempe * Eneas Kane, DMB Associates TPC Member Nominee: Mayor John Lewis, * Mark Killian, The Killian Company/Sunny Gilbert Mesa, Inc. * Not present # Participated by telephone conference call + Participated by videoconference call 1. Call to Order The meeting of the Transportation Policy Committee (TPC) was called to order by Vice Chair Marie Lopez Rogers at 4:05 p.m. 2. Pledge of Allegiance The Pledge of Allegiance was recited. Vice Chair Rogers announced that Councilmember Gail Barney was participating by videoconference and Mayor Jim Lane and Kent Andrews were participating by telephone. -1- Vice Chair Rogers introduced Gilbert Mayor John Lewis, whose appointment to the TPC is on the June 24, 2009, Regional Council agenda. She welcomed Mayor Lewis, who was attending the meeting to acquaint himself with the TPC process. Vice Chair Rogers noted that this was Councilwoman Baier’s last TPC meeting. She congratulated Councilwoman Baier on her appointment by the Governor to lead the State Land Department.
    [Show full text]
  • Arizona Transportation History
    Arizona Transportation History Final Report 660 December 2011 Arizona Department of Transportation Research Center DISCLAIMER The contents of this report reflect the views of the authors who are responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the Arizona Department of Transportation or the Federal Highway Administration. This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation. Trade or manufacturers' names which may appear herein are cited only because they are considered essential to the objectives of the report. The U.S. Government and the State of Arizona do not endorse products or manufacturers. Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. FHWA-AZ-11-660 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date December 2011 ARIZONA TRANSPORTATION HISTORY 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author 8. Performing Organization Report No. Mark E. Pry, Ph.D. and Fred Andersen 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. History Plus 315 E. Balboa Dr. 11. Contract or Grant No. Tempe, AZ 85282 SPR-PL-1(173)-655 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13.Type of Report & Period Covered ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 206 S. 17TH AVENUE PHOENIX, ARIZONA 85007 14. Sponsoring Agency Code Project Manager: Steven Rost, Ph.D. 15. Supplementary Notes Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration 16. Abstract The Arizona transportation history project was conceived in anticipation of Arizona’s centennial, which will be celebrated in 2012. Following approval of the Arizona Centennial Plan in 2007, the Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) recognized that the centennial celebration would present an opportunity to inform Arizonans of the crucial role that transportation has played in the growth and development of the state.
    [Show full text]
  • May 3, 2012 TO: Members of the MAG Management Committee FROM
    May 3, 2012 TO: Members of the MAG Management Committee FROM: Charlie Meyer, City of Tempe, Chair SUBJECT: MEETING NOTIFICATION AND TRANSMITTAL OF REVISED TENTATIVE AGENDA Wednesday, May 9, 2012 - 12:00 noon MAG Office, Suite 200 - Saguaro Room 302 North 1st Avenue, Phoenix The agenda has been revised to modify the requested action for agenda item #6, Regional Freeway and Highway Life Cycle Program – 2012 Rebalancing. The next Management Committee meeting will be held at the MAG offices at the time and place noted above. Members of the Management Committee may attend the meeting either in person, by videoconference or by telephone conference call. The agenda and summaries are also being transmitted to the members of the Regional Council to foster increased dialogue between members of the Management Committee and Regional Council. You are encouraged to review the supporting information enclosed. Lunch will be provided at a nominal cost. Please park in the garage under the building, bring your ticket, parking will be validated. For those using transit, Valley Metro/RPTA will provide transit tickets for your trip. For those using bicycles, please lock your bicycle in the bike rack in the garage. Pursuant to Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), MAG does not discriminate on the basis of disability in admissions to or participation in its public meetings. Persons with a disability may request a reasonable accommodation, such as a sign language interpreter, by contacting Valerie Day at the MAG office. Requests should be made as early as possible to allow time to arrange the accommodation.
    [Show full text]