Species Diversity Versus Phylogenetic Diversity: a Practical Study in the Taxonomically Difficult Genus Dactylorhiza (Orchidaceae)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Species Diversity Versus Phylogenetic Diversity: a Practical Study in the Taxonomically Difficult Genus Dactylorhiza (Orchidaceae) BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION 129 (2006) 4– 13 available at www.sciencedirect.com journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/biocon Species diversity versus phylogenetic diversity: A practical study in the taxonomically difficult genus Dactylorhiza (Orchidaceae) Yohan Pillona,b,1, Michael F. Faya, Alexey B. Shipunova, Mark W. Chasea,* aJodrell Laboratory, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Kew Road, Richmond, Surrey TW9 3DS, UK bLaboratoire de Biologie et Physiologie Ve´ge´tales Applique´es (LBPVA), Universite´ de la Nouvelle-Cale´donie, BP 4477, 98847 Noume´a, New Caledonia ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Article history: Setting conservation priorities in taxonomically complex groups such as the orchid genus Received 28 December 2004 Dactylorhiza is a difficult task. As an alternative to taxonomic diversity, we used here a Received in revised form molecular phylogenetic analysis and the results of a genetic investigation using plastid 17 May 2005 microsatellites with an extensive geographic sampling to assess in a more objective way Accepted 3 June 2005 the patterns of diversity within this genus. Although western Europe is thought to be the Available online 18 November 2005 main diversity centre for the genus due to the large number of species found there, we found higher phylogenetic and genetic diversity as well as higher endemicity in the Cauca- Keywords: sus and the Mediterranean Basin, two biodiversity hotspots. Species number seems to be Biodiversity hotspots correlated with taxonomic effort, tentatively estimated here by the number of herbaria, Dactylorhiza and is thus biased and not an appropriate measure of diversity. Our results show that phy- Orchids logenetic analyses and genetic data obtained with molecular tools can offer an alternative Phylogenetic diversity measure of biodiversity that is not sensitive to taxonomic inflation. Conservation of allote- Taxonomy traploid taxa is also discussed, and it is recommended that sites in which polyploids are formed should be conserved rather than any specific allotetraploid taxon. Ó 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. 1. Introduction been shown to be monophyletic if the former monotypic genus Coeloglossum Hartman is included in synonymy (Prid- Members of the genus Dactylorhiza Necker ex Nevski (Orchid- geon et al., 1997; Cribb and Chase, 2001). aceae), the spotted and marsh orchids, are terrestrial orchids from the Northern Hemisphere. They occupy a wide range of 1.1. Distribution and diversity open habitats from dune slacks to alpine meadows, including swamps and peat bogs. The subtribe to which they belong, The distribution of Dactylorhiza, including D. viridis Bateman, Orchidinae, is most diverse in Eurasia, encompassing the Pridgeon and Chase formerly Coeloglossum viride Hartman, majority of European orchids. According to Averyanov covers most of Europe, most of temperate Asia, North Africa, (1990), there are 75 species of Dactylorhiza worldwide and 58 Japan, the Aleutian Islands and northern parts of North in Europe, North Africa and the Near East (hereafter termed America (Fig. 1). Averyanov (1990) distinguished three centres Europe and adjacent areas; Delforge, 2001). Dactylorhiza has of diversity: western Europe (including the British Isles, Ger- * Corresponding author: Tel.: +44 2083325364; fax: +44 2083325310. E-mail address: [email protected] (M.W. Chase) 1 Present address: Laboratoire de Botanique, Centre IRD de Noume´a, BP A5, 98848 Noume´a, New Caledonia.. 0006-3207/$ - see front matter Ó 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2005.06.036 BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION 129 (2006) 4– 13 5 Fig. 1 – World distribution of the genus Dactylorhiza (shaded areas), including the former genus Coeloglossum, modified from Pridgeon et al. (2001) and Luer (1975). of three broad groups: D. incarnata s.l., D. maculata s.l. and allotetraploids that are hybrids between the first two groups (Hedre´n, 2001). The D. maculata group is itself composed of diploid and tetraploid species, delimitation of which is of- ten difficult. 1.3. Threats and conservation status As with many other terrestrial orchids, populations of Dacty- lorhiza have decreased due to habitat loss. Many wetlands in Europe have been drained, and changing agricultural prac- tices have led to the degradation of their habitats through Fig. 2 – Species diversity of Dactylorhiza across Eurasia, use of fertilizers, early haymaking, etc. More recently, the de- reproduced from Averyanov (1990). Darker areas are said to crease in agricultural pressure has had a counterintuitive ef- contain the greatest number of Dactylorhiza species. fect: abandonment of grassland leads to forest expansion and fewer suitable habitats. However, a few species such as D. fuchsii and D. praetermissa have shown some ability to colo- many and southern Scandinavia), the Carpathian Balkan area nize human disturbed environments, but generally tran- and Asia Minor (Fig. 2). This is in broad agreement with data siently. Another threat to Dactylorhiza is the collection of given in Delforge (2001), according to whom the greatest spe- their tubers to make salep, used as food and medicine. This cies richness is found in northwestern Europe. For instance, is a particularly important threat in the Himalayas (Srivastava nine species are endemic to the British Isles according to Del- and Mainera, 1994), where D. hatagirea or ‘‘panch aunle’’ is forgeÕs classification (2001). Dactylorhiza viridis, the species judged critically endangered (Biodiversity Conservation Prior- with the largest range, is the only one to become widespread itisation Project, 1998) due to over-collection. Thus, several in the New World (Luer, 1975). Dactylorhiza is thus unusual species of Dactylorhiza are declining, and some are already among European orchid genera, most of which show greatest protected at a national scale, e.g., in Belgium, Luxembourg, diversity around the Mediterranean Basin. Nepal, and the UK. Setting conservation priorities in taxonomically complex 1.2. Taxonomic issues in the genus groups is an essential but especially difficult task because these species tend to be over-represented in red lists (Pilgrim Dactylorhiza is universally recognized as a taxonomically et al., 2004). Hybridization has often made decision-making challenging genus (Bourne´rias et al., 1998; Pedersen, 1998; difficult in conservation (Rieseberg and Gerber, 1995; Wayne Delforge, 2001; Hedre´n, 2001), as demonstrated by the differ- and Gittleman, 1995), and neglecting taxonomy can have ences in the number of species recognized by different disastrous effects on the conservation of a particular group, authors (reviewed by Pedersen, 1998), from 12 to 75 world- e.g., the tuatara (Daugherty et al., 1990). In the case of Dacty- wide and from 6 to 58 in Europe. There can even be impor- lorhiza such problems have already been encountered; D. lap- tant differences between treatments by the same author. ponica, formerly classed as a threatened species in Britain, Delforge (1995) for example, added nine species between proved to be indistinguishable from D. traunsteineri (a more his monographs of 1995 and 2001. This taxonomic complex- frequent species) after morphological and molecular investi- ity can largely be explained by the frequency of hybridiza- gations (Bateman, 2001; Pillon et al., in press; Bateman, sub- tion, and nearly all hybrid combinations are possible mitted). Thus, caution should be applied before setting taxon (Averyanov, 1990). Most Dactylorhiza species belong to the priorities, and molecular systematics can aid in this task D. incarnata/maculata polyploid complex, which is composed (Soltis and Gitzendanner, 1999). 6 BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION 129 (2006) 4– 13 1.4. Alternative measures of biodiversity entry order with tree bisection reconnection (TBR) swapping and no tree limit per replicate. Clade support was assessed The aim of conservation biology is to preserve biodiversity: with 1000 bootstrap replicates. DELTRAN optimization was ‘‘the variety of life in all its manifestation’’ (Gaston and Spicer, used for branch length measures because of known problems 1998). Species richness is by far the most commonly used with ACCTRAN in PAUP*4.01b10. No particular short or long measure of biodiversity, but many others also exist (Purvis branches that could result in substantial under- or over- and Hector, 2000). Some approaches have proposed giving dif- weighting of a lineage were observed. All DNA sequences ferent weight to species because some species are more dis- have been submitted to GenBank and have Accession Nos. tinctive and genetically isolated than others, e.g., one DQ022863 to DQ022926 (DQ022863 to DQ022894 for ITS and species of apomictic Taraxacum may not deserve the same DQ022895 to DQ022926 for the rpl16 intron). attention as the single species of Welwitschia (Vane-Wright Using the distributions given in Delforge (2001), we listed et al., 1991). Because Dactylorhiza species are unequally dis- for each country or region the species occurring there and tant from each other, some being barely distinguishable mapped them on the tree. Phylogenetic diversity was mea- genetically and others relatively isolated, we thought that sured for each region as the sum of branch lengths (i.e., num- evolutionary history or phylogenetic diversity could be a bet- ber of nucleotide substitutions) between the first node within ter measure of the diversity of a region (Faith, 1992; Mace Dactylorhiza and the tips of the tree whenever the correspond- et al., 2003) than purely taxonomic diversity. A hierarchical
Recommended publications
  • Breeding Ecology of Kittlitz's Murrelet at Agattu Island, Alaska, in 2010
    AMNWR 2011/01 BREEDING ECOLOGY OF KITTLITZ’S MURRELET AT AGATTU ISLAND, ALASKA, IN 2010: PROGRESS REPORT Photo: R. Kaler/USFWS 1 2 1 1 3 Robb S. A. Kaler , Leah A. Kenney , Jeffrey C. Williams , G. Vernon Byrd , and John F. Piatt Key Words: Alaska, Aleutian Islands, Brachyramphus brevirostris, breeding ecology, growth rates, Kittlitz’s murrelet, Near Islands, nest site selection, parental provisioning, reproductive success. 1Alaska Maritime National Wildlife Refuge 95 Sterling Highway, Suite 1 Homer, Alaska 99603 2Department of Biological Sciences University of Alaska Anchorage Anchorage, Alaska 99501 3Alaska Science Center, US Geological Survey 4210 University Drive Anchorage, Alaska 99508 Cite as: Kaler, R.S.A., L.A. Kenney, J.C. Williams, G.V. Byrd, and J.F. Piatt. 2011. Breeding biology of Kittlitz’s murrelet at Agattu Island, Alaska, in 2010: progress report. U.S. Fish and Wildl. Serv. Rep. AMNWR 2011/01. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................... 3 STUDY AREA .............................................................................................................................. 4 METHODS .................................................................................................................................... 4 RESULTS ...................................................................................................................................... 8 2010 SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS ...................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Dactylorhiza Nevski, the Correct Generic Name of the Dactylorchids
    DACTYLORHIZA NEVSKI, THE CORRECT GENERIC NAME OF THE DACTYLORCHIDS By P. F. HUNT and V. S. SUMMERHAYES Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew ABSTRACT The correct generic name for the dactylorchids (marsh and spotted orchids) is shown to be Dactylorhiza Nevski. A list of species of Dactylorhiza is given and the subspecies occurring in the British Isles are indicated. Several new combinations at specific and subspecific rank and five new bigeneric hybrid formulae are published for the first time. In his Species Plantarum (939-944, 1753) Linnaeus divided the genus Orchis into three parts based on the morphology of the roots, namely: Bulbis indivisis, Bulbis palmatis and Bulbis fasciculatis. Some time later, Necker, in his Elementa Botanica (3, 129, 1790), raised these groups to generic level although he actually used the category name 'species naturalis' for them. Orchis L. was retained for Bulbis indivisis whilst Bulbis palmatis and Bulbis fasciculatis became Dactylorhiza Necker. The next important treatment of the genus was by Klinge, in 1898 (Acta Hort. Petrop. 17,148). He recognized two subgenera, namely Eu-orchis, into which he placed the Linnaean Bulbis indivisis, and Dactylorchis which included Bulbis palmatis. This classification was adopted by many later workers, but in 1935, Nevski, in his account of the Orchidaceae for the Flora URSS, substituted Necker's name Dactylorhiza for the second of Klinge's sub­ genera on the ground that it was earlier than Dactylorchis Klinge. Nevski also seems to have excluded Linnaeus's Bulbis fasciculatis, at least by implication. Two years later, however, Nevski evidently decided that the two subgenera were better treated as distinct genera and adopted the generic name Dactylorhiza, making a new combination, D.
    [Show full text]
  • Cally Plant List a ACIPHYLLA Horrida
    Cally Plant List A ACIPHYLLA horrida ACONITUM albo-violaceum albiflorum ABELIOPHYLLUM distichum ACONITUM cultivar ABUTILON vitifolium ‘Album’ ACONITUM pubiceps ‘Blue Form’ ACAENA magellanica ACONITUM pubiceps ‘White Form’ ACAENA species ACONITUM ‘Spark’s Variety’ ACAENA microphylla ‘Kupferteppich’ ACONITUM cammarum ‘Bicolor’ ACANTHUS mollis Latifolius ACONITUM cammarum ‘Franz Marc’ ACANTHUS spinosus Spinosissimus ACONITUM lycoctonum vulparia ACANTHUS ‘Summer Beauty’ ACONITUM variegatum ACANTHUS dioscoridis perringii ACONITUM alboviolaceum ACANTHUS dioscoridis ACONITUM lycoctonum neapolitanum ACANTHUS spinosus ACONITUM paniculatum ACANTHUS hungaricus ACONITUM species ex. China (Ron 291) ACANTHUS mollis ‘Long Spike’ ACONITUM japonicum ACANTHUS mollis free-flowering ACONITUM species Ex. Japan ACANTHUS mollis ‘Turkish Form’ ACONITUM episcopale ACANTHUS mollis ‘Hollard’s Gold’ ACONITUM ex. Russia ACANTHUS syriacus ACONITUM carmichaelii ‘Spätlese’ ACER japonicum ‘Aconitifolium’ ACONITUM yezoense ACER palmatum ‘Filigree’ ACONITUM carmichaelii ‘Barker’s Variety’ ACHILLEA grandifolia ACONITUM ‘Newry Blue’ ACHILLEA ptarmica ‘Perry’s White’ ACONITUM napellus ‘Bergfürst’ ACHILLEA clypeolata ACONITUM unciniatum ACIPHYLLA monroi ACONITUM napellus ‘Blue Valley’ ACIPHYLLA squarrosa ACONITUM lycoctonum ‘Russian Yellow’ ACIPHYLLA subflabellata ACONITUM japonicum subcuneatum ACONITUM meta-japonicum ADENOPHORA aurita ACONITUM napellus ‘Carneum’ ADIANTUM aleuticum ‘Japonicum’ ACONITUM arcuatum B&SWJ 774 ADIANTUM aleuticum ‘Miss Sharples’ ACORUS calamus ‘Argenteostriatus’
    [Show full text]
  • Review Article Conservation Status of the Family Orchidaceae in Spain Based on European, National, and Regional Catalogues of Protected Species
    Hind ile Scientific Volume 2018, Article ID 7958689, 18 pages https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/7958689 Hindawi Review Article Conservation Status of the Family Orchidaceae in Spain Based on European, National, and Regional Catalogues of Protected Species Daniel de la Torre Llorente© Biotechnology-Plant Biology Department, Higher Technical School of Agronomic, Food and Biosystems Engineering, Universidad Politecnica de Madrid, 28140 Madrid, Spain Correspondence should be addressed to Daniel de la Torre Llorente; [email protected] Received 22 June 2017; Accepted 28 December 2017; Published 30 January 2018 Academic Editor: Antonio Amorim Copyright © 2018 Daniel de la Torre Llorente. Tis is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Tis report reviews the European, National, and Regional catalogues of protected species, focusing specifcally on the Orchidaceae family to determine which species seem to be well-protected and where they are protected. Moreover, this examination highlights which species appear to be underprotected and therefore need to be included in some catalogues of protection or be catalogued under some category of protection. Te national and regional catalogues that should be implemented are shown, as well as what species should be included within them. Tis report should be a helpful guideline for environmental policies about orchids conservation in Spain, at least at the regional and national level. Around 76% of the Spanish orchid fora are listed with any fgure of protection or included in any red list, either nationally (about 12-17%) or regionally (72%).
    [Show full text]
  • Jahresberichte Des Naturwissenschaftlichen Vereins In
    Die Orchideen der Randgebiete des europäischen Florenbereiches Titelbild: Neottianthe cucullata (Foto: E. Klein) Die Orchideen der Randgebiete des europäischen Florenbereiches Redaktion: Karlheinz Senghas und Hans Sundermann Jahresberichte des Naturwissenschaftlichen Vereins Wuppertal Heft 29 - 1976 BRÜCKE-VERLAG KURT SCHMERSOW - HlLDESHElM Dieses Heft stellt den erweiterten Bericht über die „5.Wuppertaler Orchideen-Tagung" und damit die Fortsetzung von Heft 19 der Jahresberichte „Probleme der Orchideen- gattung Ophrys" (1964), von Heft 21/22 „Probleme der Orchideengattung Dactylorhiza" (1968), von Heft 23 „Probleme der Orchideengattung Epipactis" (1970) und von Heft 25 „Probleme der Orchideengattung Orchis, mit Nachträgen zu Ophrys, Dactylorhiza, Epipactis und Hybriden" (1972) dar. Das Heft erscheint gleichzeitig als Sonderheft der Zeitschrift „DIE ORCHIDEE", Herausgeber Deutsche Orchideen-Gesellschaft e. V. Ausgegeben arn 1. Dezember 1977. Naturwissenschaftlicher Verein Wuppertal und FUHLROTT-Museum Wuppertal Redaktions-Komitee: D. BRANDES (Mikroskopie), W. KOLBE (Zoologie unter Aus- schluß der Ornithologie), H. LEHMANN (Ornithologie), H. KNUBEL (Geographie), H. A. OFFE, M. LÜCKE (Geologie, Paläontologie und Mineralogie), H. SUNDERMANN (Botanik unter Ausschluß der Mykologie), H. WOLLWEBER (Mykologie) Schriftentausch und -vertrieb: FUHLROTT-Museum . Auer Schulstraße 20 .5600 Wuppertal 1 Satz und Druck: Hagemann-Druck, Hildesheim Inhaltsverzeichnis Vorwort (K. SENGHAS) .......................... Programm der 5 . Wuppertaler Orchideen-Tagung
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetics of Tribe Orchideae (Orchidaceae: Orchidoideae)
    Annals of Botany 110: 71–90, 2012 doi:10.1093/aob/mcs083, available online at www.aob.oxfordjournals.org Phylogenetics of tribe Orchideae (Orchidaceae: Orchidoideae) based on combined DNA matrices: inferences regarding timing of diversification and evolution of pollination syndromes Luis A. Inda1,*, Manuel Pimentel2 and Mark W. Chase3 1Escuela Polite´cnica Superior de Huesca, Universidad de Zaragoza, carretera de Cuarte sn. 22071 Huesca, Spain, 2Facultade de Ciencias, Universidade da Corun˜a, Campus da Zapateira sn. 15071 A Corun˜a, Spain and 3Jodrell Laboratory, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 3DS, UK * For correspondence. E-mail [email protected] Received: 3 November 2011 Returned for revision: 9 December 2011 Accepted: 1 March 2012 Published electronically: 25 April 2012 † Background and aims Tribe Orchideae (Orchidaceae: Orchidoideae) comprises around 62 mostly terrestrial genera, which are well represented in the Northern Temperate Zone and less frequently in tropical areas of both the Old and New Worlds. Phylogenetic relationships within this tribe have been studied previously using only nuclear ribosomal DNA (nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer, nrITS). However, different parts of the phylogenetic tree in these analyses were weakly supported, and integrating information from different plant genomes is clearly necessary in orchids, where reticulate evolution events are putatively common. The aims of this study were to: (1) obtain a well-supported and dated phylogenetic hypothesis for tribe Orchideae, (ii) assess appropriateness of recent nomenclatural changes in this tribe in the last decade, (3) detect possible examples of reticulate evolution and (4) analyse in a temporal context evolutionary trends for subtribe Orchidinae with special emphasis on pollination systems.
    [Show full text]
  • In Vitro Symbiotic Culture Studies of Some Orchid Species Bazı Orkide
    Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi Journal of Agricultural Sciences Tar. Bil. Der. Dergi web sayfası: Journal homepage: www.agri.ankara.edu.tr/dergi www.agri.ankara.edu.tr/journal In vitro Symbiotic Culture Studies of Some Orchid Species Arzu ab ÇIĞ , Hüdai YILMAZ aSiirt University, Agriculture Faculty, Department of Horticulture, Kezer Campus, Siirt, TURKEY bPamukkale University, School of Applied Sciences, Denizli, TURKEY ARTICLE INFO Research Article DOI: 10.15832/ankutbd.385859 23 (2017) 453-463 Corresponding Author: Arzu ÇIĞ, E-mail: [email protected], Tel: +90 (531) 623 15 33 Received: 27 August 2014, Received in Revised Form: 19 February 2016, Accepted: 16 September 2017 ABSTRACT This study investigated the formation of protocorms and shoots from in vitro cultured seeds of Dactylorhiza iberica (Bieb. ex Willd.) Soó, D. umbrosa (Kar. and Kir.) Nevski, and Orchis palustris Jacquin. Culture conditions included binucleate Rhizoctonia and Rhizoctonia solani isolates, which were symbiotic cultures isolated from the tubers of these plants, and culture media consisting of an oat medium (OM) or a modified oat medium (MOM). The shortest times for protocorm and shoot development of D. umbrosa sowed in OM were 42.67 and 66 days, respectively. The highest rate of protocorm development and the lowest percentage of formation of darkened protocorms in D. umbrosa were 60% (in OM) and 2.99% (in MOM), respectively. The maximum percentage of shoots obtained from protocorms was 35.04% for D. iberica cultured in OM. All data were obtained using binucleate Rhizoctonia sp. inoculates in the nutrient media. Keywords: In vitro; Orchid; Protocorm; Rhizoctonia spp.; Shoot Bazı Orkide Türlerinin in vitro Simbiyotik Kültür Çalışmaları ESER BİLGİSİ SCIENCES JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL Araştırma Makalesi — Sorumlu Yazar: Arzu ÇIĞ, E-posta: [email protected], Tel: +90 (531) 623 15 33 Geliş Tarihi: 27 Ağustos 2014, Düzeltmelerin Gelişi: 19 Şubat 2016, Kabul: 16 Eylül 2017 ÖZET Bu çalışmada Dactylorhiza iberica (Bieb.
    [Show full text]
  • Click to View .Pdf of This Issue
    JJoouurrnnaall of the HHAARRDDYY OORRCCHHIIDD SSOOCCIIEETTYY Vol. 6 No. 2 (52) April 2009 JOURNAL of the HARDY ORCHID SOCIETY Vol. 6 No. 2 (52) April 2009 The Hardy Orchid Society Our aim is to promote interest in the study of Native European Orchids and those from similar temperate climates throughout the world. We cover such varied aspects as field study, cultivation and propagation, photography, taxonomy and systematics, and practical conservation. We welcome articles relating to any of these subjects, which will be considered for publication by the editorial committee. Please send your submissions to the Editor, and please structure your text according to the “Advice to Authors” (see website, January 2004 Journal, Members’ Handbook or contact the Editor). Views expressed in journal articles are those of their author(s) and may not reflect those of HOS. The Hardy Orchid Society Committee President: Prof. Richard Bateman, Jodrell Laboratory, Royal Botanic Gardens Kew, Richmond, Surrey, TW9 3DS Chairman & Field Meeting Co-ordinator: David Hughes, Linmoor Cottage, Highwood, Ringwood, Hants., BH24 3LE [email protected] Vice-Chairman: Celia Wright, The Windmill, Vennington, Westbury, Shrewsbury, Shropshire, SY5 9RG [email protected] Secretary (Acting): Alan Leck, 61 Fraser Close, Deeping St. James, Peterborough, PE6 8QL [email protected] Treasurer: Iain Wright, The Windmill, Vennington, Westbury, Shrewsbury, Shropshire, SY5 9RG [email protected] Membership Secretary: Celia Wright, The Windmill, Vennington, Westbury,
    [Show full text]
  • Wildlife Travel Burren 2018
    The Burren 2018 species list and trip report, 7th-12th June 2018 WILDLIFE TRAVEL The Burren 2018 s 1 The Burren 2018 species list and trip report, 7th-12th June 2018 Day 1: 7th June: Arrive in Lisdoonvarna; supper at Rathbaun Hotel Arriving by a variety of routes and means, we all gathered at Caherleigh House by 6pm, sustained by a round of fresh tea, coffee and delightful home-made scones from our ever-helpful host, Dermot. After introductions and some background to the geology and floral elements in the Burren from Brian (stressing the Mediterranean component of the flora after a day’s Mediterranean heat and sun), we made our way to the Rathbaun, for some substantial and tasty local food and our first taste of Irish music from the three young ladies of Ceolan, and their energetic four-hour performance (not sure any of us had the stamina to stay to the end). Day 2: 8th June: Poulsallach At 9am we were collected by Tony, our driver from Glynn’s Coaches for the week, and following a half-hour drive we arrived at a coastal stretch of species-rich limestone pavement which represented the perfect introduction to the Burren’s flora: a stunningly beautiful mix of coastal, Mediterranean, Atlantic and Arctic-Alpine species gathered together uniquely in a natural rock garden. First impressions were of patchy grassland, sparkling with heath spotted- orchids Dactylorhiza maculata ericetorum and drifts of the ubiquitous and glowing-purple bloody crane’s-bill Geranium sanguineum, between bare rock. A closer look revealed a diverse and colourful tapestry of dozens of flowers - the yellows of goldenrod Solidago virgaurea, kidney-vetch Anthyllis vulneraria, and bird’s-foot trefoil Lotus corniculatus (and its attendant common blue butterflies Polyommatus Icarus), pink splashes of wild thyme Thymus polytrichus and the hairy local subspecies of lousewort Pedicularis sylvatica ssp.
    [Show full text]
  • International Phd PLANT HEALTH TECHNOLOGIES and PROTECTION of AGROECOSYSTEMS XXVII CYCLE 2012-2014 Molecular Characterization Of
    International PhD PLANT HEALTH TECHNOLOGIES AND PROTECTION OF AGROECOSYSTEMS XXVII CYCLE 2012-2014 Molecular characterization of Rhizoctonia spp. isolates and sustainable approaches to control Rhizoctonia diseases in ornamental nursery This thesis is presented for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy by PIETRO TINDARO FORMICA COORDINATOR TUTOR PROF. C. RAPISARDA PROF. G.POLIZZI This work was supported by MIUR project PON01_01611 (SO.PRO.ME.: Sustainable production of Potted Plants in Mediterranea Environment) Contents 1. The genus Rhizoctonia ................................................................................................. 1 1.1. Introduction .......................................................................................................... 1 1.2. Anastomosis group (AG) of Rhizoctonia solani and BNR and molecular analysis . 3 1.3. Systematics of Rhizoctonia species ....................................................................... 7 Genus Thanatephorus [Rhizoctonia s. str.] ...................................................................... 7 Genus Ceratobasidium [binucleate Rhizoctonia (BNR)] .................................................. 9 1.4. Biology .............................................................................................................. 12 1.5. Pathogenicity and hosts....................................................................................... 15 1.5.1. Seed decay .................................................................................................. 15 1.5.2.
    [Show full text]
  • Kew Science Publications for the Academic Year 2017–18
    KEW SCIENCE PUBLICATIONS FOR THE ACADEMIC YEAR 2017–18 FOR THE ACADEMIC Kew Science Publications kew.org For the academic year 2017–18 ¥ Z i 9E ' ' . -,i,c-"'.'f'l] Foreword Kew’s mission is to be a global resource in We present these publications under the four plant and fungal knowledge. Kew currently has key questions set out in Kew’s Science Strategy over 300 scientists undertaking collection- 2015–2020: based research and collaborating with more than 400 organisations in over 100 countries What plants and fungi occur to deliver this mission. The knowledge obtained 1 on Earth and how is this from this research is disseminated in a number diversity distributed? p2 of different ways from annual reports (e.g. stateoftheworldsplants.org) and web-based What drivers and processes portals (e.g. plantsoftheworldonline.org) to 2 underpin global plant and academic papers. fungal diversity? p32 In the academic year 2017-2018, Kew scientists, in collaboration with numerous What plant and fungal diversity is national and international research partners, 3 under threat and what needs to be published 358 papers in international peer conserved to provide resilience reviewed journals and books. Here we bring to global change? p54 together the abstracts of some of these papers. Due to space constraints we have Which plants and fungi contribute to included only those which are led by a Kew 4 important ecosystem services, scientist; a full list of publications, however, can sustainable livelihoods and natural be found at kew.org/publications capital and how do we manage them? p72 * Indicates Kew staff or research associate authors.
    [Show full text]
  • Laurisilva of Madeira Portugal
    LAURISILVA OF MADEIRA PORTUGAL The Laurisilva of Madeira is the largest surviving relict of a virtually extinct laurel forest type once widespread in Europe. It is still 90% primary forest and is a centre of plant diversity, containing a unique suite of rare and relict plants and animals, especially endemic bryophytes, ferns, vascular plants, animals such as the Madeiran long-toed pigeon and a very rich invertebrate fauna. COUNTRY Portugal NAME Laurisilva of Madeira NATURAL WORLD HERITAGE SITE 1999: Inscribed on the World Heritage List under Natural Criteria ix and x. STATEMENT OF OUTSTANDING UNIVERSAL VALUE The UNESCO World Heritage Committee adopted the following Statement of Outstanding Universal Value at the time of inscription: Brief Synthesis The Laurisilva of Madeira, within the Parque Natural da Madeira (Madeira Natural Park) conserves the largest surviving area of primary laurel forest or "laurisilva", a vegetation type that is now confined to the Azores, Madeira and the Canary Islands. These forests display a wealth of ecological niches, intact ecosystem processes, and play a predominant role in maintaining the hydrological balance on the Island of Madeira. The property has great importance for biodiversity conservation with at least 76 vascular plant species endemic to Madeira occurring in the property, together with a high number of endemic invertebrates and two endemic birds including the emblematic Madeiran Laurel Pigeon. Criterion (ix): The Laurisilva of Madeira is an outstanding relict of a previously widespread laurel forest type, which covered much of Southern Europe 15-40 million years ago. The forest of the property completely covers a series of very steep, V-shaped valleys leading from the plateau and east-west ridge in the centre of the island to the north coast.
    [Show full text]