DOCSLIB.ORG

Wetlands in Russia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Wetlands in Russia WETLANDS IN RUSSIA Volume 4 Wetlands in Northeastern Russia Compiled by A.V.Andreev Moscow 2004 © Wetlands International, 2004 All rights reserved. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study, research, criticism, or review (as permitted under the Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988) no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, electrical, chemical, mechanical, optical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior permission of the copyright holder. The production of this publication has been generously supported by the Ministry of Agriculture, Nature and Food Quality, The Netherlands Citation: Andreev, A.V. 2004. Wetlands in Russia, Volume 4: Wetlands in Northeastern Russia. Wetlands International–Russia Programme.198 pp. ISBN 90-5882-024-6 Editorial Board: V.O.Avdanin, V.G.Vinogradov, V.Yu. Iliashenko, I.E.Kamennova, V.G.Krivenko, V.A.Orlov, V.S.Ostapenko, V.E.Flint Translation: Yu.V.Morozov Editing of English text: D. Engelbrecht Layout: M.A.Kiryushkin Cover photograph: A.V.Andreev Designed and produced by KMK Scientific Press Available from: Wetlands International-Russia Programme Nikoloyamskaya Ulitsa, 19, stroeniye 3 Moscow 109240, Russia Fax: + 7 095 7270938; E-mail: [email protected] The presentation of material in this publication and the geographical designations employed do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of Wetlands International, concerning the legal status of any territory or area, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Contents FOREWORD .........................................................................................................................................................................5 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................................................................6 GENERAL CHARACTERISTIC OF WETLANDS AND THEIR LOCATION IN NORTHERN ADMINISTRATIVE REGIONS OF THE RUSSIAN FAR EAST ......8 CLASSIFICATION, LIST OF WETLANDS AND THEIR LOCATION .......................................................................................................21 WETLand INVENTORY ........................................................................................................................................................24 1. East Siberian Sea Catchment ......................................................................................................................................24 1.1. Lower Chukochya River ..........................................................................................................................................24 1.2. Kolyma Delta ..........................................................................................................................................................28 1.3. Khalerchinskaya Tundra ..........................................................................................................................................36 1.4. Lower Rauchua River and Kyttyk Peninsula ...........................................................................................................41 1.5. Ust-Chaun ...............................................................................................................................................................43 1.6. Nolde Bay ...............................................................................................................................................................48 1.7. Billings Cape ...........................................................................................................................................................50 1.8. Seabird colonies on the East Siberian Sea Coast .....................................................................................................51 2. Kolyma River Catchment ...........................................................................................................................................64 2.1. Ilirneiskiye Lakes ....................................................................................................................................................64 2.2. Omolon-Anyui Interfluvial Area ..............................................................................................................................65 2.3. Middle Omolon River .............................................................................................................................................68 2.4. Balygychanskaya Basin ...........................................................................................................................................73 2.5. Jack London Lake ...................................................................................................................................................76 3. Chukchi Sea Catchment ..............................................................................................................................................81 3.1. Lower Amguema River and Ukouge Lagoon ...........................................................................................................81 3.2. Kolyuchin Island .....................................................................................................................................................84 3.3. Belyaka Spit ............................................................................................................................................................85 3.4. Kolyuchinskaya Bay (southern part) ........................................................................................................................87 3.5. Ioni Lake .................................................................................................................................................................89 3.6. Lower Chegitun River .............................................................................................................................................90 3.7. Uelen and Inchoun Lagoons ....................................................................................................................................92 3.8. Lake Koolen ............................................................................................................................................................94 3.9. Seabird colonies on the Chukchi Sea Coast .............................................................................................................96 4. Bering Sea Catchment ..............................................................................................................................................101 4.1. Mechigmen Bay ....................................................................................................................................................101 4.2. Senyavin Straits .....................................................................................................................................................102 4.3. Lower Avtotkul River ............................................................................................................................................105 4.4. Markovskaya Basin ............................................................................................................................................... 112 4.5. Lake Elgygytkin .................................................................................................................................................... 116 4.6. Seabird colonies on the Bering Sea Coast (from Cape Dezhnev to Cape Navarin) ................................................120 5. Sea of Okhotsk Catchment .......................................................................................................................................124 5.1. Malkachanskaya Tundra ........................................................................................................................................124 5.2. Yamskiye Islands ...................................................................................................................................................131 5.3. Nakhatandzhinskaya Tundra ..................................................................................................................................134 5.4. Babushkin Bay ......................................................................................................................................................142 5.5. Odyan Bay and Umara Island ................................................................................................................................145 5.6. Lake Chistoye ........................................................................................................................................................149 Wetlands in Russia 5.7. Olskaya Lagoon.....................................................................................................................................................150 5.8. Motykleisky Bay ...................................................................................................................................................153 5.9. Talan Island ...........................................................................................................................................................156 5.10. Kavinskaya Basin and Chukcha Lake
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Title Post-Soviet Period Changes in Resource Utilization and Their
    Post-Soviet Period Changes in Resource Utilization Title and Their Impact on Population Dynamics: Chukotka Autonomous Okrug Author(s) Litvinenko, Tamara Vitalyevna; Kumo, Kazuhiro Citation Issue Date 2017-08 Type Technical Report Text Version publisher URL http://hdl.handle.net/10086/28761 Right Hitotsubashi University Repository Center for Economic Institutions Working Paper Series No. 2017-3 “Post-Soviet Period Changes in Resource Utilization and Their Impact on Population Dynamics: Chukotka Autonomous Okrug” Tamara Vitalyevna Litvinenko and Kazuhiro Kumo August 2017 Center for Economic Institutions Working Paper Series Institute of Economic Research Hitotsubashi University 2-1 Naka, Kunitachi, Tokyo, 186-8603 JAPAN http://cei.ier.hit-u.ac.jp/English/index.html Tel:+81-42-580-8405/Fax:+81-42-580-8333 Post-Soviet Period Changes in Resource Utilization and Their Impact on Population Dynamics: Chukotka Autonomous Okrug Tamara Vitalyevna Litvinenko Institute of Geography, Russian Academy of Sciences Kazuhiro Kumo Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University, Japan Abstract This study examines changes that have occurred in the resource utilization sector and the impact of these changes on population dynamics in the Chukotka Autonomous Okrug during the post-Soviet period. This paper sheds light on the sorts of population-dynamics-related differences that have emerged in the region and how these differences relate to the use of natural resources and the ethnic composition of the population. Through this study, it was shown that changes have tended to be small in local areas where indigenous peoples who have engaged in traditional natural resource use for a large proportion of the population, while changes have been relatively large in areas where the proportion of non-indigenous people is high and the mining industry has developed.
    [Show full text]
  • Improved Conservation Plant Materials Released by NRCS and Cooperators Through December 2014
    Natural Resources Conservation Service Improved Conservation Plant Materials Released by Plant Materials Program NRCS and Cooperators through December 2014 Page intentionally left blank. Natural Resources Conservation Service Plant Materials Program Improved Conservation Plant Materials Released by NRCS and Cooperators Through December 2014 Norman A. Berg Plant Materials Center 8791 Beaver Dam Road Building 509, BARC-East Beltsville, Maryland 20705 U.S.A. Phone: (301) 504-8175 prepared by: Julie A. DePue Data Manager/Secretary [email protected] John M. Englert Plant Materials Program Leader [email protected] January 2015 Visit our Website: http://Plant-Materials.nrcs.usda.gov TABLE OF CONTENTS Topics Page Introduction ...........................................................................................................................................................1 Types of Plant Materials Releases ........................................................................................................................2 Sources of Plant Materials ....................................................................................................................................3 NRCS Conservation Plants Released in 2013 and 2014 .......................................................................................4 Complete Listing of Conservation Plants Released through December 2014 ......................................................6 Grasses ......................................................................................................................................................8
    [Show full text]
  • Contemporary State of Glaciers in Chukotka and Kolyma Highlands ISSN 2080-7686
    Bulletin of Geography. Physical Geography Series, No. 19 (2020): 5–18 http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/bgeo-2020-0006 Contemporary state of glaciers in Chukotka and Kolyma highlands ISSN 2080-7686 Maria Ananicheva* 1,a, Yury Kononov 1,b, Egor Belozerov2 1 Russian Academy of Science, Institute of Geography, Moscow, Russia 2 Lomonosov State University, Faculty of Geography, Moscow, Russia * Correspondence: Russian Academy of Science, Institute of Geography, Moscow, Russia. E-mail: [email protected] a https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6377-1852, b https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3117-5554 Abstract. The purpose of this work is to assess the main parameters of the Chukotka and Kolyma glaciers (small forms of glaciation, SFG): their size and volume, and changes therein over time. The point as to whether these SFG can be considered glaciers or are in transition into, for example, rock glaciers is also presented. SFG areas were defined from the early 1980s (data from the catalogue of the glaciers compiled by R.V. Sedov) to 2005, and up to 2017: these data were retrieved from sat- Key words: ellite images. The maximum of the SGF reduction occurred in the Chantalsky Range, Iskaten Range, Chukotka Peninsula, and in the northern part of Chukotka Peninsula. The smallest retreat by this time relates to the gla- Kolyma Highlands, ciers of the southern part of the peninsula. Glacier volumes are determined by the formula of S.A. satellite image, Nikitin for corrie glaciers, based on in-situ volume measurements, and by our own method: the av- climate change, erage glacier thickness is calculated from isogypsum patterns, constructed using DEMs of individu- glacier reduction, al glaciers based on images taken from a drone during field work, and using ArcticDEM for others.
    [Show full text]
  • Helicobacter Pylori's Historical Journey Through Siberia and the Americas
    Helicobacter pylori’s historical journey through Siberia and the Americas Yoshan Moodleya,1,2, Andrea Brunellib,1, Silvia Ghirottoc,1, Andrey Klyubind, Ayas S. Maadye, William Tynef, Zilia Y. Muñoz-Ramirezg, Zhemin Zhouf, Andrea Manicah, Bodo Linzi, and Mark Achtmanf aDepartment of Zoology, University of Venda, Thohoyandou 0950, Republic of South Africa; bDepartment of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy; cDepartment of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy; dDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Research Institute for Physical-Chemical Medicine, 119435 Moscow, Russia; eDepartment of Diagnostic and Operative Endoscopy, Pirogov National Medical and Surgical Center, 105203 Moscow, Russia; fWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, United Kingdom; gLaboratorio de Bioinformática y Biotecnología Genómica, Escuela Nacional de Ciencias Biológicas, Unidad Profesional Lázaro Cárdenas, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, 11340 Mexico City, Mexico; hDepartment of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, United Kingdom; and iDepartment of Biology, Division of Microbiology, Friedrich Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, 91058 Erlangen, Germany Edited by Daniel Falush, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom, and accepted by Editorial Board Member W. F. Doolittle April 30, 2021 (received for review July 22, 2020) The gastric bacterium Helicobacter pylori shares a coevolutionary speakers). However, H. pylori’s presence, diversity, and structure history with humans that predates the out-of-Africa diaspora, and in northern Eurasia are still unknown. This vast region, hereafter the geographical specificities of H. pylori populations reflect mul- Siberia, extends from the Ural Mountains in the west to the tiple well-known human migrations. We extensively sampled H.
    [Show full text]
  • Sources and Pathways 4.1
    Chapter 4 Persistant toxic substances (PTS) sources and pathways 4.1. Introduction Chapter 4 4.1. Introduction 4.2. Assessment of distant sources: In general, the human environment is a combination Longrange atmospheric transport of the physical, chemical, biological, social and cultur- Due to the nature of atmospheric circulation, emission al factors that affect human health. It should be recog- sources located within the Northern Hemisphere, par- nized that exposure of humans to PTS can, to certain ticularly those in Europe and Asia, play a dominant extent, be dependant on each of these factors. The pre- role in the contamination of the Arctic. Given the spa- cise role differs depending on the contaminant con- tial distribution of PTS emission sources, and their cerned, however, with respect to human intake, the potential for ‘global’ transport, evaluation of long- chain consisting of ‘source – pathway – biological avail- range atmospheric transport of PTS to the Arctic ability’ applies to all contaminants. Leaving aside the region necessarily involves modeling on the hemi- biological aspect of the problem, this chapter focuses spheric/global scale using a multi-compartment on PTS sources, and their physical transport pathways. approach. To meet these requirements, appropriate modeling tools have been developed. Contaminant sources can be provisionally separated into three categories: Extensive efforts were made in the collection and • Distant sources: Located far from receptor sites in preparation of input data for modeling. This included the Arctic. Contaminants can reach receptor areas the required meteorological and geophysical informa- via air currents, riverine flow, and ocean currents. tion, and data on the physical and chemical properties During their transport, contaminants are affected by of both the selected substances and of their emissions.
    [Show full text]
  • Spanning the Bering Strait
    National Park service shared beringian heritage Program U.s. Department of the interior Spanning the Bering Strait 20 years of collaborative research s U b s i s t e N c e h UN t e r i N c h UK o t K a , r U s s i a i N t r o DU c t i o N cean Arctic O N O R T H E L A Chu a e S T kchi Se n R A LASKA a SIBERIA er U C h v u B R i k R S otk S a e i a P v I A en r e m in i n USA r y s M l u l g o a a S K S ew la c ard Peninsu r k t e e r Riv n a n z uko i i Y e t R i v e r ering Sea la B u s n i CANADA n e P la u a ns k ni t Pe a ka N h las c A lf of Alaska m u a G K W E 0 250 500 Pacific Ocean miles S USA The Shared Beringian Heritage Program has been fortunate enough to have had a sustained source of funds to support 3 community based projects and research since its creation in 1991. Presidents George H.W. Bush and Mikhail Gorbachev expanded their cooperation in the field of environmental protection and the study of global change to create the Shared Beringian Heritage Program.
    [Show full text]
  • Vascular Plant Inventory of Mount Rainier National Park
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Program Center Vascular Plant Inventory of Mount Rainier National Park Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/NCCN/NRTR—2010/347 ON THE COVER Mount Rainier and meadow courtesy of 2007 Mount Rainier National Park Vegetation Crew Vascular Plant Inventory of Mount Rainier National Park Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/NCCN/NRTR—2010/347 Regina M. Rochefort North Cascades National Park Service Complex 810 State Route 20 Sedro-Woolley, Washington 98284 June 2010 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Program Center Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Program Center publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Technical Report Series is used to disseminate results of scientific studies in the physical, biological, and social sciences for both the advancement of science and the achievement of the National Park Service mission. The series provides contributors with a forum for displaying comprehensive data that are often deleted from journals because of page limitations. All manuscripts in the series receive the appropriate level of peer review to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and designed and published in a professional manner. This report received informal peer review by subject-matter experts who were not directly involved in the collection, analysis, or reporting of the data.
    [Show full text]
  • A Region with Special Needs the Russian Far East in Moscow’S Policy
    65 A REGION WITH SPECIAL NEEDS THE RUSSIAN FAR EAST IN MOSCOW’s pOLICY Szymon Kardaś, additional research by: Ewa Fischer NUMBER 65 WARSAW JUNE 2017 A REGION WITH SPECIAL NEEDS THE RUSSIAN FAR EAST IN MOSCOW’S POLICY Szymon Kardaś, additional research by: Ewa Fischer © Copyright by Ośrodek Studiów Wschodnich im. Marka Karpia / Centre for Eastern Studies CONTENT EDITOR Adam Eberhardt, Marek Menkiszak EDITOR Katarzyna Kazimierska CO-OPERATION Halina Kowalczyk, Anna Łabuszewska TRANSLATION Ilona Duchnowicz CO-OPERATION Timothy Harrell GRAPHIC DESIGN PARA-BUCH PHOTOgrAPH ON COVER Mikhail Varentsov, Shutterstock.com DTP GroupMedia MAPS Wojciech Mańkowski PUBLISHER Ośrodek Studiów Wschodnich im. Marka Karpia Centre for Eastern Studies ul. Koszykowa 6a, Warsaw, Poland Phone + 48 /22/ 525 80 00 Fax: + 48 /22/ 525 80 40 osw.waw.pl ISBN 978-83-65827-06-7 Contents THESES /5 INTRODUctiON /7 I. THE SPEciAL CHARActERISticS OF THE RUSSIAN FAR EAST AND THE EVOLUtiON OF THE CONCEPT FOR itS DEVELOPMENT /8 1. General characteristics of the Russian Far East /8 2. The Russian Far East: foreign trade /12 3. The evolution of the Russian Far East development concept /15 3.1. The Soviet period /15 3.2. The 1990s /16 3.3. The rule of Vladimir Putin /16 3.4. The Territories of Advanced Development /20 II. ENERGY AND TRANSPORT: ‘THE FLYWHEELS’ OF THE FAR EAST’S DEVELOPMENT /26 1. The energy sector /26 1.1. The resource potential /26 1.2. The infrastructure /30 2. Transport /33 2.1. Railroad transport /33 2.2. Maritime transport /34 2.3. Road transport /35 2.4.
    [Show full text]
  • Alagnak Wild River & Katmai National Park Vascular Plant Inventory Annual Technical Report
    ALAGNAK WILD RIVER & KATMAI NATIONAL PARK VASCULAR PLANT INVENTORY ANNUAL TECHNICAL REPORT Matthew L. Carlson & Robert Lipkin Alaska Natural Heritage Program Environment and Natural Resources Institute University of Alaska Anchorage 707 "A" Street Anchorage, Alaska 99501 National Park Service Alaska Region Inventory & Monitoring Program NPS Report : June 2003 Cooperative Agreement No. 1443CA991000013 Funding Source: National Park Service, Inventory & Monitoring Program ALAGNAK WILD RIVER & KATMAI NATIONAL PARK VASCULAR PLANT INVENTORY ANNUAL TECHNICAL REPORT 2 ABSTRACT In 2002, the Alaska Natural Heritage Program (AKNHP), conducted vascular plant field inventories in the Alagnak Wild River and Katmai Nation Park units in accordance with a cooperative agreement with the National Park Service. The primary goal was to document ≥ 90% of the vascular plant species expected to occur within the parks and significantly improve our understanding of current species distributions. The inventory targeted diverse habitat types and poorly-sampled areas. The AKNHP visited four diverse eco-geographic regions and sampled intensively within these regions from late June to mid-August, 2002. A total of 530 specimens were collected, recorded, pressed, and curated. For Katmai Park, 317 individual taxa are represented, 146 are new records for the park, and an additional 41 represent verifications of previously unvouchered reports. Of the 133 specimens collected from the Alagnak Wild River, 120 are new records for that unit. A number of finds were significant range extensions or taxa of conservation concern. Dupontia fisheri is a tundra grass of northern and western Alaska. We located a population at Swikshak Lagoon, over 300 km east of the other outlying stations, and this site is the first recording from a woodland marsh in Alaska.
    [Show full text]
  • XI. International Conference on Permafrost, Book of Abstracts
    XI. INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PERMAFROST | 20.-24. JUNE 2016 Landscapes and thermokarst lake area changes in Yedoma regions under modern climate conditions, Kolyma lowland tundra Aleksandra Veremeeva1, Nagezhda Glushkova2, Frank Günther3, Ingmar Nitze3, & Guido Grosse3 1Institute of Physical, Chemical and Biological Problems in Soil Science, Russian Academy of Sciences, Pushchino, Russia 2Institute of Geology and Mineralogy SB RAS, Novosibirsk, Russia 3Alfred Wegener Institute Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research, Potsdam, Germany Recent landscape changes in the Yedoma region period. This map shows the magnitude and direction are particularly pronounced in varying thermokarst of changes for each multi-spectral index, which are lake areas reflecting the reaction of the land surface used as proxies for different land-surface properties. on modern climate changes. However, although ther- For single locations, the entire time-series can be fur- mokarst lake change detection is essential for the ther analyzed in more detail. For the period from quantification of water body expansion and drainage 1999 till 2005 air temperatures and precipitation have within a region, remote sensing-derived surface reflec- been analysed for several weather stations that existed tion trends additionally provide valuable information in the region. The Landsat time series analysis for about the general landscape development. The aim of the last 15 years shows that the northern part of the this research is to reveal the regularities of landscape region became wetter over the last 5 – 6 years. The and thermokarst lakes area changes in the Kolyma alases are particularly affected by the wetting trend. lowland tundra in comparison with meteorological The analysis of the meteo-data shows a trend of in- data and geological and geomorphological features.
    [Show full text]
  • Vegetation History of Central Chukotka
    Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Clim. Past Discuss., 8, 1409–1441, 2012 www.clim-past-discuss.net/8/1409/2012/ Climate doi:10.5194/cpd-8-1409-2012 of the Past CPD © Author(s) 2012. CC Attribution 3.0 License. Discussions 8, 1409–1441, 2012 This discussion paper is/has been under review for the journal Climate of the Past (CP). Vegetation history of Please refer to the corresponding final paper in CP if available. Central Chukotka Vegetation history of Central A. A. Andreev et al. Chukotka deduced from permafrost Title Page paleoenvironmental records of the Abstract Introduction El’gygytgyn Impact Crater Conclusions References A. A. Andreev1, E. Morozova2, G. Fedorov2, L. Schirrmeister3, A. A. Bobrov4, Tables Figures F. Kienast5, and G. Schwamborn3 J I 1Institute of Geology and Mineralogy, University of Cologne, Zulpicher¨ St. 49a, 50674, Cologne, Germany J I 2Arctic and Antarctic Research Institute, Bering St. 38, St. Petersburg, 199397 Russia Back Close 3Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research, Department of Periglacial Research, Telegrafenberg A43, 14473 Potsdam, Germany Full Screen / Esc 4Faculty of Soil Science, Moscow State University, Vorobievy Gory, 119899 Moscow, Russia 5Senckenberg, Research Institute and Natural History Museum, Research Station for Quaternary Paleontology, am Jakobskirchhof 4, 99423 Weimar, Germany Printer-friendly Version Received: 5 March 2012 – Accepted: 12 April 2012 – Published: 20 April 2012 Interactive Discussion Correspondence to: A. A. Andreev ([email protected]) Published by Copernicus Publications on behalf of the European Geosciences Union. 1409 Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Abstract CPD Frozen sediments from three cores bored in permafrost surrounding of the El’gygytgyn Impact Crater Lake have been studied for pollen, non-pollen palynomorphs, plant 8, 1409–1441, 2012 macrofossils, and rhizopods.
    [Show full text]
  • ECORA Project ECORA Project
    DIVISION OF GEF COORDINATION P.O. Box 30552, Nairobi, Kenya • Tel:[254 2] 624165 • Fax:[254 2] 624041/ 624042 ECORA Project (An Integrated Ecosystem Approach to Conserve Biodiversity and Minimise Habitat Fragmentation in Three Selected Model Areas in the Russian Arctic) SEMI-ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT NO. 4 January - June 2006 Report to Division of Global Environment Facility Coordination UNEP, Nairobi Prepared by Project Implementation Unit / GRID-Arendal UNEP DGEF GFL-2328-2740-4773 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ...........................................................................................................2 SUMMARY 4 Key Project Achievements during Reporting Period .................................................................. 4 Progress on Components .......................................................................................................... 6 Key Issues and Solutions........................................................................................................... 9 2. PROJECT MANAGEMENT...............................................................................................13 2.1 Administration and Co-ordination....................................................................................... 13 2.2 Project Monitoring .............................................................................................................. 14 2.2.1 Progress and Finance Reporting.......................................................................... 14 2.2.2. Project M&E System & Reporting
    [Show full text]