DOCSLIB.ORG

Jahresberichte Des Naturwissenschaftlichen Vereins In

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Jahresberichte Des Naturwissenschaftlichen Vereins In Die Orchideen der Randgebiete des europäischen Florenbereiches Titelbild: Neottianthe cucullata (Foto: E. Klein) Die Orchideen der Randgebiete des europäischen Florenbereiches Redaktion: Karlheinz Senghas und Hans Sundermann Jahresberichte des Naturwissenschaftlichen Vereins Wuppertal Heft 29 - 1976 BRÜCKE-VERLAG KURT SCHMERSOW - HlLDESHElM Dieses Heft stellt den erweiterten Bericht über die „5.Wuppertaler Orchideen-Tagung" und damit die Fortsetzung von Heft 19 der Jahresberichte „Probleme der Orchideen- gattung Ophrys" (1964), von Heft 21/22 „Probleme der Orchideengattung Dactylorhiza" (1968), von Heft 23 „Probleme der Orchideengattung Epipactis" (1970) und von Heft 25 „Probleme der Orchideengattung Orchis, mit Nachträgen zu Ophrys, Dactylorhiza, Epipactis und Hybriden" (1972) dar. Das Heft erscheint gleichzeitig als Sonderheft der Zeitschrift „DIE ORCHIDEE", Herausgeber Deutsche Orchideen-Gesellschaft e. V. Ausgegeben arn 1. Dezember 1977. Naturwissenschaftlicher Verein Wuppertal und FUHLROTT-Museum Wuppertal Redaktions-Komitee: D. BRANDES (Mikroskopie), W. KOLBE (Zoologie unter Aus- schluß der Ornithologie), H. LEHMANN (Ornithologie), H. KNUBEL (Geographie), H. A. OFFE, M. LÜCKE (Geologie, Paläontologie und Mineralogie), H. SUNDERMANN (Botanik unter Ausschluß der Mykologie), H. WOLLWEBER (Mykologie) Schriftentausch und -vertrieb: FUHLROTT-Museum . Auer Schulstraße 20 .5600 Wuppertal 1 Satz und Druck: Hagemann-Druck, Hildesheim Inhaltsverzeichnis Vorwort (K. SENGHAS) .......................... Programm der 5 . Wuppertaler Orchideen-Tagung am 22 . und 23.11.1975 .... Liste der Tagungsteilnehmer ....................... Prof. Dr. H. SUNDERMANN: Begrüßungsworte ............... DOG-Präsident Dr. G. SCHOSER: Eröffnungsansprache ............ B. L0JTNANT: Die Orchideen Grönlands - Verbreitung, Biologie und Taxonomie .............................. W. WIEFELSPUTZ: uber einige Dactylorhiza-Sippen in Großbritannien und Irland ................................ H. WOLLIN & H. SUNDERMANN: Zur Biologie der Calypso bulbosa ...... G . FREY: Die Orchideen der Azoren .................... G. FREY: Beitrag zur Orchideenflora Madeiras (I. Teil) ............ H . SUNDERMANN: Beitrag zur Orchideenflora Madeiras (I1. Teil) ....... H. BAUMANN: Eine bislang unbekannte Ophrys sphecodes-Sippe auf den maltesischen Inseln .......................... J . RENZ: Die Gattung Ophrys an der Ostgrenze ihres Areals ......... G . TAUBENHEIM: Die Verbreitung der Gattung Epipactis in der Türkei .... N. WlSNlEWSKl & E. KLEIN: Zum Verhalten von Neottianthe cucullata an der Westgrenze ihrer Verbreitung in Europa ................. W. WIEFELSPUTZ: Dactylorhiza incarnata ssp . ochroleuca auf Gotland? .... S. KUNKELE: Zur Rechtsentwicklung des Orchideenschutzes in der Bundes- republik Deutschland ......................... 0 . POTBCEK: Zur Problematik des Orchideenschutzes in der CSSR ...... I. von RAMIN: Orchideenschutz in Frankreich ............... P. GOLZ: Statistische Untersuchungen an europäischen Orchideen (I1. Teil) . S. VOGEL: Zur Ophrys-Bestäubung auf Kreta ................ P. VERMEULEN: Zur Typifikation von ..Orchis elata Poiret" ......... P . VERMEULEN: Die Säulchenstruktur von Gymnadenia. Platanthera. Habenaria und verwandten Genera ........................ 0. J. WILDHABER: Samenstruktur von Epipactis condensata. E. persica und E. pontica .............................. 0.J . WILDHABER: Karpologischer Beitrag zu Gymnadenia. Nigritella und einigen anderen montan-alpinen Arten der Orchidaceae .......... Resolution zum Artenschutz ........................ 0.J . Wildhaber t ............................. N. WiSniewski t ............................. Vorwort Die Programmgestalter machten es sich nicht leicht, für die 5. Wuppertaler Ochideen- tagung ein Rahmenthema zu finden. Die vorausgegangenen Wuppertaler Orchideen- tagungen galten den Gattungen Ophrys, Dactylorhiza, Epipactis, zuletzt Orchis. In dieser Reihe fortzufahren hätte bedeutet, sich nunmehr entweder der Gattung Serapias mit Schwerpunkt zuzuwenden oder eine Neuauflage der Ophrys-Diskussion zu riskieren. Zu beidem konnten wir uns letztendlich (noch) nicht entschließen. So gingen wir diesmal von dem systematischen Rahmenthema ab und zum geographi- schen über. Die Idee, einmal die Orchideen der geographischen Randgebiete des europäischen Florenbezirkes näher unter die Lupe zu nehmen und vorzustellen, lag andererseits schon längst auf der Hand. Wir freuen uns sehr, daß daraufhin, wenn auch nicht alle, so doch die meisten Themenvorschläge positiv aufgenommen worden sind und ihren Niederschlag in Tagungsvorträgen gefunden haben. Insofern enthält dieser Tagungsbericht eine Reihe zum Teil kritischer Studien über unsere euro- päischen Randorchideen, und zahlreiche Orchideenfreunde werden mit ihnen hiermit zum ersten Mal in Wort und Bild vertraut gemacht, zumindest dürfte es kaum einen geben, dem dieser Tagungsbericht nichts Neues bringt. Wenn Sie, verehrter Leser, das Inhaltsverzeichnis mit dem Tagungsprogramm ver- gleichen, so werden Sie feststellen können, daß bedauerlicherweise einige wenige Vorträge nicht als Manuskript eingesandt worden sind. Auch einer der inhaltlichen Höhepunkte der Arbeitstagung findet in diesem Heft keine Berücksichtigung: Die von mir eingeleitete Frage nach der Problematik der taxonomischen Kategorien und der daraus sich entwickelnden, von mir geleiteten Diskussion. Anlaß hierzu hatte die in der jüngst erschienenen 2. Auflage von Hans SUNDERMANNs Buch über die euro- päischen Orchideen geprägte neue Kategorie der praespecies, der „Vorart", gegeben. Es ist zu früh, hier schon ein abschließendes Urteil über diese Neueinführung zu wagen, wobei sich der Autor schon im klaren darüber war, daß dieser neue substan- tielle Begriff heftig umstritten sein würde. Mit schon etwas zeitlichem Abstand darf man heute dazu sagen, daß dieser Terminus bei zahlreichen Orchideenfreunden zu- mindest zu Anregungen hinsichtlich der Neubetrachtung und Neubeurteilung polymor- pher Sippen insbesondere im mediterranen Gebiet geführt hat. Der Terminus praespecies beinhaltet ja einen evolutorischen Sachverhalt, und deswegen sei von ihm aus auch an dieser Stelle schon die Brücke geschlagen zu unserer nächsten, 6. Wup- pertaler Orchideen-Arbeitstagung. Sie soll, ganz entsprechend meinem seinerzeit in Wuppertal anläßlich des Tagungsausklanges schon gemachten Vorschlag als erstes Rahmenthema die Evolution der europäisch-mediterranen Orchideen zum Inhalt haben. Ein zweites Rahmenthema sollte der Naturschutz in Verbindung mit seinem viel diskutierten und umstrittenen Teil, der Erhaltungskultur unserer heimischen Orchideen, sein. Die Wuppertaler Organisatoren wie auch die Deutsche Orchideen- Gesellschaft würden es begrüßen, wenn auch dieser nächsten Tagung ein gleich großer Erfolg wie der vergangenen beschieden sein würde. Beide Teile möchten auch hiermit nochmals allen, die zum Gelingen der vergangenen, außerordentlich diskussionsregen Tagung beigetragen haben, sei es durch ihren Besuch, sei es durch Diskussionsbeiträge, durch Diskussions- und Vortragsleitungen sowie als Vortra- gende selbst, herzlich danken. Dr. K. Senghas Präsident der Deutschen Orchideen-Gesellschaft e. V. Programm der 5. Wuppertaler Orchideen-Tagung am 22. und 23. November 1975 Sonnabend, den 22. November 10.30-11.00: Eröffnung der Tagung durch Prof. Dr. H. SUNDERMANN, Wuppertal, Oberbürgermeister G. GURLAND, Wuppertal, und Dr. G. SCHOSER, Frankfurt, Präsident der DOG 11.00-12.20: Vorsitz: G. SCHOSER J. RENZ: Die Gattung Ophrys an der Ostgrenze ihres Areals G. FREY: Die Orchideen der Azoren G. FREYIH. SUNDERMANN: Beitrag zur Orchideenflora der Insel Madeira B. L0JTNANT: Die Orchideen Grönlands - Verbreitung, Biologie und Taxonomie Diskussion 14.30-16.00: Vorsitz: K. SENGHAS S. KUNKELE: Zur Rechtsentwicklung des Orchideenschutzes in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland 0. POTUCEK: Zur Problematik des Orchideenschutzes in der &SR I. V. RAMIN: Orchideenschutz in Frankreich K. SENGHAS: Zur Verwendung taxonomischer Kategorien (Kurzreferat mit Diskussion) Diskussion Pause 17.00-18.20: Vorsitz: W. TESCHNER P. VERMEULEN: Die Säulchenstruktur von Platanthera, Habenaria und verwandten Genera 0. BORSOS: Anatomische Untersuchungen zur Blatt- und Stengel- anatomie von Erdorchideen*) P. GÖLZ: Statistische Untersuchungen an europäischen Orchideen Diskussion 19.30: Gemeinsames Abendessen im Clubraum der Bahnhofsgaststätten Wuppertal-Elberfeld Sonntag, den 23. November 9.30-10.40: Vorsitz: J. RENZ R. V. SO6: Zum gegenwärtigen Stand der Orchideenbearbeitung in der „Flora Europaea" G. TAUBENHEIM: Die Gattung Epipactis in Kleinasien 0. WILDHABER: Samenstruktur von Epipactis condensata, E. persica und E. pontica Diskussion Pause 11.30-13.00: Vorsitz: R. V. SO6 F. WISCHMANN: Dactylorhiza-Sippen aus Norwegen*) W. WIEFELSPÜTZ: Über Dactylorhiza-Sippen in Schottland und Irland P. VERMEULEN: Zur Typifikation von „Orchis elata Poiret" H. WOLLIN/H. SUNDERMANN: Zur Biologie der Calypso bulbosa Gemeinsames Mittagessen 15.00-17.30: Vorsitz: J. RENZ N. WISNIEWSKIIE. KLEIN: Zum Verhalten der Neottianthe cucullata an der Westgrenze ihrer Verbreitung in Europa W. WIEFELSPÜTZ: Dactylorhiza incarnata auf der Insel Gotland W. BAUMANN: Eine bislang unbekannte Ophrys sphecodes-Sippe auf den Maltesischen Inseln S. VOGEL: Neues zur Ophrys-Pollination auf Kreta 0. WILDHABER: Karpologischer Beitrag zu Gymnadenia, Nigritella und einigen anderen montan-alpinen Orchideen 17.30-18.00: Diskussion und Schlußwort *) Hiervon hat die Redaktion leider kein Manuskript zur Veröffentlichung erhalten. Teilnehmerliste
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2016
    Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2016 Revised February 24, 2017 Compiled by Laura Gadd Robinson, Botanist John T. Finnegan, Information Systems Manager North Carolina Natural Heritage Program N.C. Department of Natural and Cultural Resources Raleigh, NC 27699-1651 www.ncnhp.org C ur Alleghany rit Ashe Northampton Gates C uc Surry am k Stokes P d Rockingham Caswell Person Vance Warren a e P s n Hertford e qu Chowan r Granville q ot ui a Mountains Watauga Halifax m nk an Wilkes Yadkin s Mitchell Avery Forsyth Orange Guilford Franklin Bertie Alamance Durham Nash Yancey Alexander Madison Caldwell Davie Edgecombe Washington Tyrrell Iredell Martin Dare Burke Davidson Wake McDowell Randolph Chatham Wilson Buncombe Catawba Rowan Beaufort Haywood Pitt Swain Hyde Lee Lincoln Greene Rutherford Johnston Graham Henderson Jackson Cabarrus Montgomery Harnett Cleveland Wayne Polk Gaston Stanly Cherokee Macon Transylvania Lenoir Mecklenburg Moore Clay Pamlico Hoke Union d Cumberland Jones Anson on Sampson hm Duplin ic Craven Piedmont R nd tla Onslow Carteret co S Robeson Bladen Pender Sandhills Columbus New Hanover Tidewater Coastal Plain Brunswick THE COUNTIES AND PHYSIOGRAPHIC PROVINCES OF NORTH CAROLINA Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2016 Compiled by Laura Gadd Robinson, Botanist John T. Finnegan, Information Systems Manager North Carolina Natural Heritage Program N.C. Department of Natural and Cultural Resources Raleigh, NC 27699-1651 www.ncnhp.org This list is dynamic and is revised frequently as new data become available. New species are added to the list, and others are dropped from the list as appropriate.
    [Show full text]
  • Dactylorhiza Nevski, the Correct Generic Name of the Dactylorchids
    DACTYLORHIZA NEVSKI, THE CORRECT GENERIC NAME OF THE DACTYLORCHIDS By P. F. HUNT and V. S. SUMMERHAYES Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew ABSTRACT The correct generic name for the dactylorchids (marsh and spotted orchids) is shown to be Dactylorhiza Nevski. A list of species of Dactylorhiza is given and the subspecies occurring in the British Isles are indicated. Several new combinations at specific and subspecific rank and five new bigeneric hybrid formulae are published for the first time. In his Species Plantarum (939-944, 1753) Linnaeus divided the genus Orchis into three parts based on the morphology of the roots, namely: Bulbis indivisis, Bulbis palmatis and Bulbis fasciculatis. Some time later, Necker, in his Elementa Botanica (3, 129, 1790), raised these groups to generic level although he actually used the category name 'species naturalis' for them. Orchis L. was retained for Bulbis indivisis whilst Bulbis palmatis and Bulbis fasciculatis became Dactylorhiza Necker. The next important treatment of the genus was by Klinge, in 1898 (Acta Hort. Petrop. 17,148). He recognized two subgenera, namely Eu-orchis, into which he placed the Linnaean Bulbis indivisis, and Dactylorchis which included Bulbis palmatis. This classification was adopted by many later workers, but in 1935, Nevski, in his account of the Orchidaceae for the Flora URSS, substituted Necker's name Dactylorhiza for the second of Klinge's sub­ genera on the ground that it was earlier than Dactylorchis Klinge. Nevski also seems to have excluded Linnaeus's Bulbis fasciculatis, at least by implication. Two years later, however, Nevski evidently decided that the two subgenera were better treated as distinct genera and adopted the generic name Dactylorhiza, making a new combination, D.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to the Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, and Georgia, Working Draft of 17 March 2004 -- LILIACEAE
    Guide to the Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, and Georgia, Working Draft of 17 March 2004 -- LILIACEAE LILIACEAE de Jussieu 1789 (Lily Family) (also see AGAVACEAE, ALLIACEAE, ALSTROEMERIACEAE, AMARYLLIDACEAE, ASPARAGACEAE, COLCHICACEAE, HEMEROCALLIDACEAE, HOSTACEAE, HYACINTHACEAE, HYPOXIDACEAE, MELANTHIACEAE, NARTHECIACEAE, RUSCACEAE, SMILACACEAE, THEMIDACEAE, TOFIELDIACEAE) As here interpreted narrowly, the Liliaceae constitutes about 11 genera and 550 species, of the Northern Hemisphere. There has been much recent investigation and re-interpretation of evidence regarding the upper-level taxonomy of the Liliales, with strong suggestions that the broad Liliaceae recognized by Cronquist (1981) is artificial and polyphyletic. Cronquist (1993) himself concurs, at least to a degree: "we still await a comprehensive reorganization of the lilies into several families more comparable to other recognized families of angiosperms." Dahlgren & Clifford (1982) and Dahlgren, Clifford, & Yeo (1985) synthesized an early phase in the modern revolution of monocot taxonomy. Since then, additional research, especially molecular (Duvall et al. 1993, Chase et al. 1993, Bogler & Simpson 1995, and many others), has strongly validated the general lines (and many details) of Dahlgren's arrangement. The most recent synthesis (Kubitzki 1998a) is followed as the basis for familial and generic taxonomy of the lilies and their relatives (see summary below). References: Angiosperm Phylogeny Group (1998, 2003); Tamura in Kubitzki (1998a). Our “liliaceous” genera (members of orders placed in the Lilianae) are therefore divided as shown below, largely following Kubitzki (1998a) and some more recent molecular analyses. ALISMATALES TOFIELDIACEAE: Pleea, Tofieldia. LILIALES ALSTROEMERIACEAE: Alstroemeria COLCHICACEAE: Colchicum, Uvularia. LILIACEAE: Clintonia, Erythronium, Lilium, Medeola, Prosartes, Streptopus, Tricyrtis, Tulipa. MELANTHIACEAE: Amianthium, Anticlea, Chamaelirium, Helonias, Melanthium, Schoenocaulon, Stenanthium, Veratrum, Toxicoscordion, Trillium, Xerophyllum, Zigadenus.
    [Show full text]
  • Cally Plant List a ACIPHYLLA Horrida
    Cally Plant List A ACIPHYLLA horrida ACONITUM albo-violaceum albiflorum ABELIOPHYLLUM distichum ACONITUM cultivar ABUTILON vitifolium ‘Album’ ACONITUM pubiceps ‘Blue Form’ ACAENA magellanica ACONITUM pubiceps ‘White Form’ ACAENA species ACONITUM ‘Spark’s Variety’ ACAENA microphylla ‘Kupferteppich’ ACONITUM cammarum ‘Bicolor’ ACANTHUS mollis Latifolius ACONITUM cammarum ‘Franz Marc’ ACANTHUS spinosus Spinosissimus ACONITUM lycoctonum vulparia ACANTHUS ‘Summer Beauty’ ACONITUM variegatum ACANTHUS dioscoridis perringii ACONITUM alboviolaceum ACANTHUS dioscoridis ACONITUM lycoctonum neapolitanum ACANTHUS spinosus ACONITUM paniculatum ACANTHUS hungaricus ACONITUM species ex. China (Ron 291) ACANTHUS mollis ‘Long Spike’ ACONITUM japonicum ACANTHUS mollis free-flowering ACONITUM species Ex. Japan ACANTHUS mollis ‘Turkish Form’ ACONITUM episcopale ACANTHUS mollis ‘Hollard’s Gold’ ACONITUM ex. Russia ACANTHUS syriacus ACONITUM carmichaelii ‘Spätlese’ ACER japonicum ‘Aconitifolium’ ACONITUM yezoense ACER palmatum ‘Filigree’ ACONITUM carmichaelii ‘Barker’s Variety’ ACHILLEA grandifolia ACONITUM ‘Newry Blue’ ACHILLEA ptarmica ‘Perry’s White’ ACONITUM napellus ‘Bergfürst’ ACHILLEA clypeolata ACONITUM unciniatum ACIPHYLLA monroi ACONITUM napellus ‘Blue Valley’ ACIPHYLLA squarrosa ACONITUM lycoctonum ‘Russian Yellow’ ACIPHYLLA subflabellata ACONITUM japonicum subcuneatum ACONITUM meta-japonicum ADENOPHORA aurita ACONITUM napellus ‘Carneum’ ADIANTUM aleuticum ‘Japonicum’ ACONITUM arcuatum B&SWJ 774 ADIANTUM aleuticum ‘Miss Sharples’ ACORUS calamus ‘Argenteostriatus’
    [Show full text]
  • Informação Base De Biodiversidade Da Ilha Do Corvo E Do Ilhéu De Vila Franca Do Campo
    LIFE+ Safe Islands for Seabirds Relatório Acção A1 - Informação Base de Biodiversidade da Ilha do Corvo e do Ilhéu de Vila Franca do Campo LIFE07 NAT/P/000649 Corvo, Dezembro 2009 O P r o j e c O O projecto LIFE+ Safe Islands for Seabirds é uma parceria da SPEA com a Secretaria Regional do Ambiente e do Mar (SRAM), a Câmara Municipal do Corvo e a Royal Society for Protection of Birds, contando ainda com o apoio das seguintes entidades enquanto observadoras na sua Comissão Executiva: Direcção Regional dos Recursos Florestais (DRRF) e Câmara Municipal de Vila Franca do Campo. Trabalhar para o estudo e conservação das aves e seus habitats, promovendo um desenvolvimento que garanta a viabilidade do património natural para usufruto das gerações futuras. A SPEA – Sociedade Portuguesa para o Estudo das Aves é uma organização não governamental de ambiente que trabalha para a conservação das aves e dos seus habitats em Portugal. Como associação sem fins lucrativos, depende do apoio dos sócios e de diversas entidades para concretizar as suas acções. Faz parte de uma rede mundial de organizações de ambiente, a BirdLife International, que actua em mais de 100 países e tem como objectivo a preservação da diversidade biológica através da conservação das aves, dos seus habitats e da promoção do uso sustentável dos recursos naturais. LIFE+ Safe Islands for Seabirds. Relatório Inicial Sociedade Portuguesa para o Estudo das Aves, 2009 Direcção Nacional: Ricardo Azul Tomé, Maria Ana Peixe, Pedro Guerreiro, Ana Leal Martins, João Jara, Paulo Travassos, Pedro Coelho, Miguel Capelo, Paulo Simões Coelho, Teresa Catry Direcção Executiva: Luís Costa Coordenação do projecto: Pedro Luís Geraldes Equipa técnica: Ana Catarina Henriques, Carlos Silva, Joana Domingues, Nuno Oliveira, Sandra Hervías, Nuno Domingos, Susana Costa e Vanessa Oliveira.
    [Show full text]
  • Conserving Europe's Threatened Plants
    Conserving Europe’s threatened plants Progress towards Target 8 of the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation Conserving Europe’s threatened plants Progress towards Target 8 of the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation By Suzanne Sharrock and Meirion Jones May 2009 Recommended citation: Sharrock, S. and Jones, M., 2009. Conserving Europe’s threatened plants: Progress towards Target 8 of the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation Botanic Gardens Conservation International, Richmond, UK ISBN 978-1-905164-30-1 Published by Botanic Gardens Conservation International Descanso House, 199 Kew Road, Richmond, Surrey, TW9 3BW, UK Design: John Morgan, [email protected] Acknowledgements The work of establishing a consolidated list of threatened Photo credits European plants was first initiated by Hugh Synge who developed the original database on which this report is based. All images are credited to BGCI with the exceptions of: We are most grateful to Hugh for providing this database to page 5, Nikos Krigas; page 8. Christophe Libert; page 10, BGCI and advising on further development of the list. The Pawel Kos; page 12 (upper), Nikos Krigas; page 14: James exacting task of inputting data from national Red Lists was Hitchmough; page 16 (lower), Jože Bavcon; page 17 (upper), carried out by Chris Cockel and without his dedicated work, the Nkos Krigas; page 20 (upper), Anca Sarbu; page 21, Nikos list would not have been completed. Thank you for your efforts Krigas; page 22 (upper) Simon Williams; page 22 (lower), RBG Chris. We are grateful to all the members of the European Kew; page 23 (upper), Jo Packet; page 23 (lower), Sandrine Botanic Gardens Consortium and other colleagues from Europe Godefroid; page 24 (upper) Jože Bavcon; page 24 (lower), Frank who provided essential advice, guidance and supplementary Scumacher; page 25 (upper) Michael Burkart; page 25, (lower) information on the species included in the database.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetics of Tribe Orchideae (Orchidaceae: Orchidoideae)
    Annals of Botany 110: 71–90, 2012 doi:10.1093/aob/mcs083, available online at www.aob.oxfordjournals.org Phylogenetics of tribe Orchideae (Orchidaceae: Orchidoideae) based on combined DNA matrices: inferences regarding timing of diversification and evolution of pollination syndromes Luis A. Inda1,*, Manuel Pimentel2 and Mark W. Chase3 1Escuela Polite´cnica Superior de Huesca, Universidad de Zaragoza, carretera de Cuarte sn. 22071 Huesca, Spain, 2Facultade de Ciencias, Universidade da Corun˜a, Campus da Zapateira sn. 15071 A Corun˜a, Spain and 3Jodrell Laboratory, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 3DS, UK * For correspondence. E-mail [email protected] Received: 3 November 2011 Returned for revision: 9 December 2011 Accepted: 1 March 2012 Published electronically: 25 April 2012 † Background and aims Tribe Orchideae (Orchidaceae: Orchidoideae) comprises around 62 mostly terrestrial genera, which are well represented in the Northern Temperate Zone and less frequently in tropical areas of both the Old and New Worlds. Phylogenetic relationships within this tribe have been studied previously using only nuclear ribosomal DNA (nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer, nrITS). However, different parts of the phylogenetic tree in these analyses were weakly supported, and integrating information from different plant genomes is clearly necessary in orchids, where reticulate evolution events are putatively common. The aims of this study were to: (1) obtain a well-supported and dated phylogenetic hypothesis for tribe Orchideae, (ii) assess appropriateness of recent nomenclatural changes in this tribe in the last decade, (3) detect possible examples of reticulate evolution and (4) analyse in a temporal context evolutionary trends for subtribe Orchidinae with special emphasis on pollination systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Plantas Vasculares Endémicas Do Arquipélago Dos Açores
    Plantas vasculares endémicas do Arquipélago dos Açores 1 In: Guia da Excursão Geobotânica: A paisagem vegetal da Ilha Terceira (Açores). Eds. Eduardo Dias, José Prieto, Carlos Aguiar, pp: 71-78. Universidade dos Açores, 2006. I. Plantas vasculares endémicas do Arquipélago dos Açores C. Aguiar, J.A. Fernández Prieto & E. Dias 1.1. Introdução Rivas-Martínez et al. (2002) propuseram a seguinte tipologia biogeográfica para o Arquipélago dos Açores: Reino Holártico, Região Eurossiberiana, Subregião Atlântico-Centroeuropeia, Província Atlântica Europeia, Subprovíncia Açoriana. Os mesmo autores conheceram sete sectores nesta subprovíncia, coincidentes com as seguintes ilhas ou grupos de ilhas: Santa Maria e Formigas, São Miguel, Terceira, Pico, Faial, São Jorge e Graciosa e Flores e Corvo. De acordo com a distribuição actual dos endemismos vasculares e as comunidade de plantas vasculares açorianos, que a seu tempo explicitaremos numa publicação dedicada, propomos a elevação da Subprovíncia Açoriana à categoria de Província – Província Açoriana – e a sua partição em três sectores: Sector Açoriano Oriental, Açoriano Central e Açoriano Ocidental. Neste Catálogo foi organizado com objectivo de clarificar a taxonomia, nomenclatura, corologia e comportamento fitossociológico dos endemismos vasculares açorianos. Uma lista deste género é o ponto de partia para a construção de uma tipologia biogeográfica informada, num ambiente insular. A distribuição à escala da ilha apresentada neste catálogo é baseada nos trabalhos de Hansen & Sunding (1993) e Schäfer (2003), com adições e correcções. Admitimos um total de 75 endemismos vasculares nos Açores, dos quais 47 % são hemicriptófitos. 1.2. Catálogo dos endemismos vasculares açorianos Agrostis azorica (Hochst.) Tutin & E. F. Warb. var. azorica , J. Bot.
    [Show full text]
  • FINAL REPORT PSRA Vegetation Monitoring 2005-2006 PC P502173
    Rare Plants and Their Locations at Picayune Strand Restoration Area: Task 4a FINAL REPORT PSRA Vegetation Monitoring 2005-2006 PC P502173 Steven W. Woodmansee and Michael J. Barry [email protected] December 20, 2006 Submitted by The Institute for Regional Conservation 22601 S.W. 152 Avenue, Miami, Florida 33170 George D. Gann, Executive Director Submitted to Mike Duever, Ph.D. Senior Environmental Scientist South Florida Water Management District Fort Myers Service Center 2301 McGregor Blvd. Fort Myers, Florida 33901 Table of Contents Introduction 03 Methods 03 Results and Discussion 05 Acknowledgements 38 Citations 39 Tables: Table 1: Rare plants recorded in the vicinity of the Vegetation Monitoring Transects 05 Table 2: The Vascular Plants of Picayune Strand State Forest 24 Figures: Figure 1: Picayune Strand Restoration Area 04 Figure 2: PSRA Rare Plants: Florida Panther NWR East 13 Figure 3: PSRA Rare Plants: Florida Panther NWR West 14 Figure 4: PSRA Rare Plants: PSSF Northeast 15 Figure 5: PSRA Rare Plants: PSSF Northwest 16 Figure 6: PSRA Rare Plants: FSPSP West 17 Figure 7: PSRA Rare Plants: PSSF Southeast 18 Figure 8: PSRA Rare Plants: PSSF Southwest 19 Figure 9: PSRA Rare Plants: FSPSP East 20 Figure 10: PSRA Rare Plants: TTINWR 21 Cover Photo: Bulbous adder’s tongue (Ophioglossum crotalophoroides), a species newly recorded for Collier County, and ranked as Critically Imperiled in South Florida by The Institute for Regional Conservation taken by the primary author. 2 Introduction The South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) plans on restoring the hydrology at Picayune Strand Restoration Area (PSRA) see Figure 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Laurisilva of Madeira Portugal
    LAURISILVA OF MADEIRA PORTUGAL The Laurisilva of Madeira is the largest surviving relict of a virtually extinct laurel forest type once widespread in Europe. It is still 90% primary forest and is a centre of plant diversity, containing a unique suite of rare and relict plants and animals, especially endemic bryophytes, ferns, vascular plants, animals such as the Madeiran long-toed pigeon and a very rich invertebrate fauna. COUNTRY Portugal NAME Laurisilva of Madeira NATURAL WORLD HERITAGE SITE 1999: Inscribed on the World Heritage List under Natural Criteria ix and x. STATEMENT OF OUTSTANDING UNIVERSAL VALUE The UNESCO World Heritage Committee adopted the following Statement of Outstanding Universal Value at the time of inscription: Brief Synthesis The Laurisilva of Madeira, within the Parque Natural da Madeira (Madeira Natural Park) conserves the largest surviving area of primary laurel forest or "laurisilva", a vegetation type that is now confined to the Azores, Madeira and the Canary Islands. These forests display a wealth of ecological niches, intact ecosystem processes, and play a predominant role in maintaining the hydrological balance on the Island of Madeira. The property has great importance for biodiversity conservation with at least 76 vascular plant species endemic to Madeira occurring in the property, together with a high number of endemic invertebrates and two endemic birds including the emblematic Madeiran Laurel Pigeon. Criterion (ix): The Laurisilva of Madeira is an outstanding relict of a previously widespread laurel forest type, which covered much of Southern Europe 15-40 million years ago. The forest of the property completely covers a series of very steep, V-shaped valleys leading from the plateau and east-west ridge in the centre of the island to the north coast.
    [Show full text]
  • E29695d2fc942b3642b5dc68ca
    ISSN 1409-3871 VOL. 9, No. 1—2 AUGUST 2009 Orchids and orchidology in Central America: 500 years of history CARLOS OSSENBACH INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL ON ORCHIDOLOGY LANKESTERIANA INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL ON ORCHIDOLOGY Copyright © 2009 Lankester Botanical Garden, University of Costa Rica Effective publication date: August 30, 2009 Layout: Jardín Botánico Lankester. Cover: Chichiltic tepetlauxochitl (Laelia speciosa), from Francisco Hernández, Rerum Medicarum Novae Hispaniae Thesaurus, Rome, Jacobus Mascardus, 1628. Printer: Litografía Ediciones Sanabria S.A. Printed copies: 500 Printed in Costa Rica / Impreso en Costa Rica R Lankesteriana / International Journal on Orchidology No. 1 (2001)-- . -- San José, Costa Rica: Editorial Universidad de Costa Rica, 2001-- v. ISSN-1409-3871 1. Botánica - Publicaciones periódicas, 2. Publicaciones periódicas costarricenses LANKESTERIANA i TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 1 Geographical and historical scope of this study 1 Political history of Central America 3 Central America: biodiversity and phytogeography 7 Orchids in the prehispanic period 10 The area of influence of the Chibcha culture 10 The northern region of Central America before the Spanish conquest 11 Orchids in the cultures of Mayas and Aztecs 15 The history of Vanilla 16 From the Codex Badianus to Carl von Linné 26 The Codex Badianus 26 The expedition of Francisco Hernández to New Spain (1570-1577) 26 A new dark age 28 The “English American” — the journey through Mexico and Central America of Thomas Gage (1625-1637) 31 The renaissance of science
    [Show full text]
  • ===Обзорные Статьи ======Orchids of Russia: Annotated Checklist and Geographic Distribution
    Nature Conservation Research. Заповедная наука 2020. 5(Suppl.1): 1–18 https://dx.doi.org/10.24189/ncr.2020.018 ============== REVIEW ARTICLES ================ ============= ОБЗОРНЫЕ СТАТЬИ =============== ORCHIDS OF RUSSIA: ANNOTATED CHECKLIST AND GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION Petr G. Efimov Komarov Botanical Institute of RAS, Russia e-mail: [email protected] Received: 07.03.2020. Revised: 11.04.2020. Accepted: 13.04.2020. A checklist of orchids is presented for Russia. Data from the project «Biodiversity Mapping of Orchidaceae of Russia» are supplemented by the literature data in order to analyse the geographical distribution of species. We consider that the orchid diversity of Russia comprises 135 species and 13 subspecies belonging to 38 genera, in- cluding several taxa with status «uncertain for Russia»: Dactylorhiza majalis, D. sambucina, Epipactis purpurata, Cephalanthera caucasica, Anacamptis laxiflora subsp. palustris, and Platanthera komarovii subsp. maximovic- ziana. Krasnodarsky Krai has the highest number of orchid species (56 species), followed by Sakhalin Region (50), Republic of Dagestan (49), Republic of Crimea (45), Primorsky Krai (42), and Khabarovsky Krai (41). Only in As- trakhan Region there are no orchids known. One species (Anacamptis laxiflora, from one locality) is known from the Republic of Kalmykia, three species from Chukotsky Autonomous Okrug, eight species from Nenetsky Au- tonomous Okrug. Gymnadenia conopsea is the most widely distributed species, being found in 74 regions (90%), followed by Corallorhiza trifida (73 regions), Dactylorhiza incarnata (72), and D. viridis (71). Twenty-five species are known from only one administrative region. Eleven of them have been found in Sakhalin Region, four of them in Republic of Dagestan. Cephalanthera erecta, Epipactis euxina, and E.
    [Show full text]