DOCSLIB.ORG

Click to View .Pdf of This Issue

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Click to View .Pdf of This Issue JJoouurrnnaall of the HHAARRDDYY OORRCCHHIIDD SSOOCCIIEETTYY Vol. 6 No. 2 (52) April 2009 JOURNAL of the HARDY ORCHID SOCIETY Vol. 6 No. 2 (52) April 2009 The Hardy Orchid Society Our aim is to promote interest in the study of Native European Orchids and those from similar temperate climates throughout the world. We cover such varied aspects as field study, cultivation and propagation, photography, taxonomy and systematics, and practical conservation. We welcome articles relating to any of these subjects, which will be considered for publication by the editorial committee. Please send your submissions to the Editor, and please structure your text according to the “Advice to Authors” (see website, January 2004 Journal, Members’ Handbook or contact the Editor). Views expressed in journal articles are those of their author(s) and may not reflect those of HOS. The Hardy Orchid Society Committee President: Prof. Richard Bateman, Jodrell Laboratory, Royal Botanic Gardens Kew, Richmond, Surrey, TW9 3DS Chairman & Field Meeting Co-ordinator: David Hughes, Linmoor Cottage, Highwood, Ringwood, Hants., BH24 3LE [email protected] Vice-Chairman: Celia Wright, The Windmill, Vennington, Westbury, Shrewsbury, Shropshire, SY5 9RG [email protected] Secretary (Acting): Alan Leck, 61 Fraser Close, Deeping St. James, Peterborough, PE6 8QL [email protected] Treasurer: Iain Wright, The Windmill, Vennington, Westbury, Shrewsbury, Shropshire, SY5 9RG [email protected] Membership Secretary: Celia Wright, The Windmill, Vennington, Westbury, Shrewsbury, Shropshire, SY5 9RG [email protected] Plant Show Secretary: Malcolm Brownsword, 14 Manor Close, West Hagbourne, Didcot, Oxfordshire., OX11 0NQ [email protected] Journal Editor: Mike Gasson, Moor End Cottage, Moor End, Stibbard, Norfolk, NR21 0EJ, [email protected] Meetings Secretary & Publicity Officer: Maren Talbot, 4 Hazel Close, Marlow, Bucks., SL7 3PW, [email protected] Seed & Fungus Banker: Philip Seaton, 52 Shrubbery Street, Kidderminster, Worcs., DY10 2QY, [email protected] Newsletter Distributor: Iain Wright, The Windmill, Vennington, Westbury, Shrewsbury, Shropshire, SY5 9RG [email protected] Conservation and Website: Bill Temple, Primrose Cottage, Hanney Road, Steventon, Oxon., OX13 6AP, [email protected] Ordinary Member: Vacant Front Cover Photograph Northern Marsh Orchid, Dactylorhiza purpurella at Kenfig NNR, photographed by Mike Clark. See the article on page 44. 38 JOURNAL of the HARDY ORCHID SOCIETY Vol. 6 No. 2 (52) April 2009 www.hardyorchidsociety.org.uk Contents Editorial Note ....................................................................................................... 39 Chairman’s Corner by David Hughes .................................................................. 39 Photographic Competition 2008 .. ................................ ........................................ 40 Programme for Kidlington ............................. ...................................................... 43 Orchids of Kenfig NNR, South Wales by Mike Clark ............... ......................... 44 A Southern France Miscellany by Les Lewis ...................... ................................ 48 What’s in a Name? 1. The Heavy Responsibility of Using a Previously Described Name by Richard Bateman ..... ... ............... 53 The Princes Risborough Helleborines by Simon Harrap ............. ...................... 64 OrchidIreland by Tom Curtis & Robert Thompson ........ .................. .................. 67 Book Review by Paul Harcourt Davies: “ Orchidee Regine dei Fiori ” .. ............. 69 Editorial Note This issue has two very welcome new authors who are well known orchid enthusi - asts: Mike Clark and Simon Harrap. Mike is an excellent photographer and author - ity on Kenfig and both of these are featured in his contribution. Simon will be known to most through his book “ Orchids of Britain and Ireland ”; his article continues dis - cussion on the “Princess Risborough Helleborines”. The general issues that this HOS debate has raised are reviewed in the first of two major articles by our President, Prof. Richard Bateman. We will try to draw this interesting discussion to a close in JHOS , so if there are any last words on the subject do submit them soon. Robert Thompson and Tom Curtis draw attention to the important “Orchid Ireland ” project that aims to advance knowledge of the orchid flora in the island of Ireland. Also, there are two new books dedicated to Ireland’s orchids just published or about to be published. We plan to include a review of “ Ireland's Wild Orchids: A Field Guide ” by Brendan Sayers & Susan Sex and “ The Orchids of Ireland ” by Tom Curtis & Robert Thompson” in the July JHOS . Chairman’s Corner David Hughes The New Forest is snowbound as I write this, a good time to be thinking of the year ahead and the orchids we will find and grow. Christine and I can’t wait too long so we’re off to Cyprus tomorrow to catch a few early Ophrys . Wearing my field meet - ing coordinator’s hat, can I remind you that the list of meetings for 2009 was pub - lished in the January journal. These are spread around the country as best I could arrange and if there are gaps please let me know if you might fill them. If you haven’t already done so, do book yourselves in for these trips. To prevent the risk of 39 JOURNAL of the HARDY ORCHID SOCIETY Vol. 6 No. 2 (52) April 2009 trampling, numbers on each field trip have to be limited, so I regret that you will be disappointed if you don’t book promptly. Field trips are listed on the HOS website, which Bill Temple assiduously keeps up to date, recordsing when a trip is full up. When we consider field work we must consider our duty to protect fragile locations and threatened species. It is important that members do not give out sensitive infor - mation unless confident about the reliability of the receiver. Refusal may cause annoyance but that is much better that the risk of damage to a special site or plant. The start of the new orchid year means the end of the old. The boundary for us is marked by the AGM at Kidlington. All members are entitled to attend and vote with - out charge. This is the time the committee renews itself; several long serving mem - bers are standing down and I am happy to say that I have volunteers for the majori - ty of the vacant posts; who and which will be listed in the AGM Agenda. I will give details in my Chairman’s report. All members are free to stand for office themselves but please notify me before the AGM if you do wish to stand or propose another, with their agreement. Some of you will remember that we had some difficulty with the digital projector at Wisley. We would like someone to run the projector on the day of meetings. Please contact me. Also at this meeting, we have the Plant Show. In order to ensure its success, please bring along as many entries as possible. Last year we had a good number of entries in the beginners' and non-competitive class - es. Please do what you can to continue this encouraging trend. Full entry details are on the hand-out, on the website, and in the HOS Handbook. I look forward to hear - ing from you, meeting you at Kidlington and in the field. Have a good year of orchid hunting and culture. Photographic Competition 2008 A further selection of photographs from the 2008 Photographic Competition is shown on the following two pages. As before, they are identified by a number indicating the class followed by the place. 3-1 Ron Harrison - Himantoglossum hircinium 3-2 Tony Hughes - Dactylorhiza fuchsii 6-2 Sean Cole - Neotinea ustulata 8-2 Tony Hughes - Ophrys apifera 8-3 Neville Roberts- Habenaria radiata 9-2 Alan Blackman - Orchis mascula 10-2 John Spencer - Ophrys apulica 11-2 Nigel Johnson - Ophrys israelitica 12-2 Rosemary Webb - Cephalanthera longifolia 13-1 Peter Fleckney - Anacamptis pyramidalis 13-2 Lorne Edwards - Orchis italica 40 8-2 8-3 11-2 13-2 13-1 10-2 9-2 6-2 3-1 12-2 3-2 JOURNAL of the HARDY ORCHID SOCIETY Vol. 6 No. 2 (52) April 2009 Programme for Kidlington, Sunday 19 th April 2009 09.00 Hall opens - Plant Show exhibits and entries to be staged by 10.00 10.00 Tea / Coffee 10.30 AGM 11.00 Simon Andrew - Orchids of France over 40 years 12.00 Paula Rudell - Close up and Personal, Microscopic Studies of European Orchid Flowers 12.35 Prof. Richard Bateman - Do Bigger Leaves Mean Longer Spurs, an Update on the HOS Platanthera Survey 13.00 Lunch & Tea / Coffee 14.00 Judge’s comments on the Plant Show 14.30 Iain Wright - An Enigmatic Variation 14.40 Simon Tarrant - Orchids of Iceland 14.50 Short break 15.00 Phil Seaton - Orchid Growing from Seed 16.00 Tea / Coffee 17.00 Vacate Hall Laneside Alpine & Hardy Orchid Nursery One of the largest selections of hardy orchids available in the country including many flowering or near flowering sized Anacamptis, Bletilla, Calanthe, Cypripedium, Dactylorhiza, Epipactis, Orchis, Ophrys and others. The Cypripediums include I am the sole UK supplier many of the world renowned of species from Frosch hybrids Svante Malmgren I stock a wide range of rare and unusual alpines for rockeries, troughs and tufa. Also available: tufa, Shap granite and Seramis Mail order from July until end of March. Visit www.lanesidealpines.com for current plant lists and show information. I will be attending numerous venues around the country in 2009 including the new Peterborough Show. Nursery: Bells Bridge Lane (off B5272 Cockerham Road), Garstang, Lancs. (Visits by arrangement - please phone or e-mail) Office: Jeff Hutchings, 74 Croston Road, Garstang, Preston PR3 1HR 01995 605537 mob 07946659661 or e-mail [email protected] 43 JOURNAL of the HARDY ORCHID SOCIETY Vol. 6 No. 2 (52) April 2009 Orchids of Kenfig NNR, South Wales Mike Clark Kenfig National Nature Reserve is located on the south-eastern edge of Swansea Bay and it is renowned for its extensive sand dunes (Fig. 1). The large tidal range, onshore winds and low-lying coastal hinterland have contributed to the development of the dune system, which extends inland for over 3km at its widest point.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Breeding Ecology of Kittlitz's Murrelet at Agattu Island, Alaska, in 2010
    AMNWR 2011/01 BREEDING ECOLOGY OF KITTLITZ’S MURRELET AT AGATTU ISLAND, ALASKA, IN 2010: PROGRESS REPORT Photo: R. Kaler/USFWS 1 2 1 1 3 Robb S. A. Kaler , Leah A. Kenney , Jeffrey C. Williams , G. Vernon Byrd , and John F. Piatt Key Words: Alaska, Aleutian Islands, Brachyramphus brevirostris, breeding ecology, growth rates, Kittlitz’s murrelet, Near Islands, nest site selection, parental provisioning, reproductive success. 1Alaska Maritime National Wildlife Refuge 95 Sterling Highway, Suite 1 Homer, Alaska 99603 2Department of Biological Sciences University of Alaska Anchorage Anchorage, Alaska 99501 3Alaska Science Center, US Geological Survey 4210 University Drive Anchorage, Alaska 99508 Cite as: Kaler, R.S.A., L.A. Kenney, J.C. Williams, G.V. Byrd, and J.F. Piatt. 2011. Breeding biology of Kittlitz’s murrelet at Agattu Island, Alaska, in 2010: progress report. U.S. Fish and Wildl. Serv. Rep. AMNWR 2011/01. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................... 3 STUDY AREA .............................................................................................................................. 4 METHODS .................................................................................................................................... 4 RESULTS ...................................................................................................................................... 8 2010 SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS ...................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Dactylorhiza Nevski, the Correct Generic Name of the Dactylorchids
    DACTYLORHIZA NEVSKI, THE CORRECT GENERIC NAME OF THE DACTYLORCHIDS By P. F. HUNT and V. S. SUMMERHAYES Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew ABSTRACT The correct generic name for the dactylorchids (marsh and spotted orchids) is shown to be Dactylorhiza Nevski. A list of species of Dactylorhiza is given and the subspecies occurring in the British Isles are indicated. Several new combinations at specific and subspecific rank and five new bigeneric hybrid formulae are published for the first time. In his Species Plantarum (939-944, 1753) Linnaeus divided the genus Orchis into three parts based on the morphology of the roots, namely: Bulbis indivisis, Bulbis palmatis and Bulbis fasciculatis. Some time later, Necker, in his Elementa Botanica (3, 129, 1790), raised these groups to generic level although he actually used the category name 'species naturalis' for them. Orchis L. was retained for Bulbis indivisis whilst Bulbis palmatis and Bulbis fasciculatis became Dactylorhiza Necker. The next important treatment of the genus was by Klinge, in 1898 (Acta Hort. Petrop. 17,148). He recognized two subgenera, namely Eu-orchis, into which he placed the Linnaean Bulbis indivisis, and Dactylorchis which included Bulbis palmatis. This classification was adopted by many later workers, but in 1935, Nevski, in his account of the Orchidaceae for the Flora URSS, substituted Necker's name Dactylorhiza for the second of Klinge's sub­ genera on the ground that it was earlier than Dactylorchis Klinge. Nevski also seems to have excluded Linnaeus's Bulbis fasciculatis, at least by implication. Two years later, however, Nevski evidently decided that the two subgenera were better treated as distinct genera and adopted the generic name Dactylorhiza, making a new combination, D.
    [Show full text]
  • Review Article Conservation Status of the Family Orchidaceae in Spain Based on European, National, and Regional Catalogues of Protected Species
    Hind ile Scientific Volume 2018, Article ID 7958689, 18 pages https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/7958689 Hindawi Review Article Conservation Status of the Family Orchidaceae in Spain Based on European, National, and Regional Catalogues of Protected Species Daniel de la Torre Llorente© Biotechnology-Plant Biology Department, Higher Technical School of Agronomic, Food and Biosystems Engineering, Universidad Politecnica de Madrid, 28140 Madrid, Spain Correspondence should be addressed to Daniel de la Torre Llorente; [email protected] Received 22 June 2017; Accepted 28 December 2017; Published 30 January 2018 Academic Editor: Antonio Amorim Copyright © 2018 Daniel de la Torre Llorente. Tis is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Tis report reviews the European, National, and Regional catalogues of protected species, focusing specifcally on the Orchidaceae family to determine which species seem to be well-protected and where they are protected. Moreover, this examination highlights which species appear to be underprotected and therefore need to be included in some catalogues of protection or be catalogued under some category of protection. Te national and regional catalogues that should be implemented are shown, as well as what species should be included within them. Tis report should be a helpful guideline for environmental policies about orchids conservation in Spain, at least at the regional and national level. Around 76% of the Spanish orchid fora are listed with any fgure of protection or included in any red list, either nationally (about 12-17%) or regionally (72%).
    [Show full text]
  • Actes Du 15E Colloque Sur Les Orchidées De La Société Française D’Orchidophilie
    Cah. Soc. Fr. Orch., n° 7 (2010) – Actes 15e colloque de la Société Française d’Orchidophilie, Montpellier Actes du 15e colloque sur les Orchidées de la Société Française d’Orchidophilie du 30 mai au 1er juin 2009 Montpellier, Le Corum Comité d’organisation : Daniel Prat, Francis Dabonneville, Philippe Feldmann, Michel Nicole, Aline Raynal-Roques, Marc-Andre Selosse, Bertrand Schatz Coordinateurs des Actes Daniel Prat & Bertrand Schatz Affiche du Colloque : Conception : Francis Dabonneville Photographies de Francis Dabonneville & Bertrand Schatz Cahiers de la Société Française d’Orchidophilie, N° 7, Actes du 15e Colloque sur les orchidées de la Société Française d’Orchidophilie. ISSN 0750-0386 © SFO, Paris, 2010 Certificat d’inscription à la commission paritaire N° 55828 ISBN 978-2-905734-17-4 Actes du 15e colloque sur les Orchidées de la Société Française d’Orchidophilie, D. Prat et B. Schatz, Coordinateurs, SFO, Paris, 2010, 236 p. Société Française d’Orchidophilie 17 Quai de la Seine, 75019 Paris Cah. Soc. Fr. Orch., n° 7 (2010) – Actes 15e colloque de la Société Française d’Orchidophilie, Montpellier Préface Ce 15e colloque marque le 40e anniversaire de notre société, celle-ci ayant vu le jour en 1969. Notre dernier colloque se tenait il y a 10 ans à Paris en 1999, 10 ans c’est long, 10 ans c’est très loin. Il fallait que la SFO renoue avec cette traditionnelle organisation de colloques, manifestation qui a contribué à lui accorder la place prépondérante qu’elle occupe au sein des orchidophiles français et de la communauté scientifique. C’est chose faite aujourd’hui. Nombreux sont les thèmes qui font l’objet de communications par des intervenants dont les compétences dans le domaine de l’orchidologie ne sont plus à prouver.
    [Show full text]
  • Die Gattung Epipactis Und Ihre Systematische Stellung Innnerhalb Der Unterfamilie Neottioideae, Im Lichte Enhvickiungsgeschichtli- Eher Untersuchungen
    Jber. natnrwiss. Ver Wuppertal 51 43 - 100 Wuppertal, 15.9.1998 Die Gattung Epipactis und ihre systematische Stellung innnerhalb der Unterfamilie Neottioideae, im Lichte enhvickiungsgeschichtli- eher Untersuchungen. Kar1 Robatsch Mit Zeichnungen von L. FREIDINGER und C. A. MRKVICKA Zusammenfassung: Die systematische Stellung der Gattung Epipactis in der Subtribus Cephalantherinae wie auch die Stel- lung dieser Subtribus innerhalb der Unterfamilie Neottioideae wird an Beispielen enhvickungsgeschicht- licher Untersuchungen diskutiert. Nach den neuesten molekularen Daten, die aus DNA-Sequenzanalysen gewonnen wurden, ist ein Stammbaum erstellt worden, in dem die Neottioideae in die "epidendroids" eingereiht wurden. Das steht im Widerspruch zu dem in unserer Arbeit praktizierten Klassifikations- System, das in "Die Orcliideen" R. SCHLECHTER in der Bearbeitung von F. BMEGER und K. SENGHAS venvendet wird. Die Ableitung einer Orchideenblüte aus dem Liliiflorae-Erbe ermögliclit eine Differentialdiagnose zwi- schen den Orchidaceae und den Apostasiaceae. Die Apostasiaceae, die viele Autoren als Unterfamilie Apostasioideae zu den Orchidaceae stellen, werden durch vergleichende Blütenanalysen von dieser Familie abgetrennt. Der Entwickiungstendenz des Gynoeceums der Orchideen, durch die es zum Auf- bau eines Rostellums mit seinen Organen kommt, steht die Reduktionstendenz des Gynoeceums der Apostasiaceae, durch die es zu einer Verminderung des ursprünglich trimeren Stigmas kommt, gegen- über. Die Autogamie der Gattung Epipactis (Sektion Epipactis)
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetics of Tribe Orchideae (Orchidaceae: Orchidoideae)
    Annals of Botany 110: 71–90, 2012 doi:10.1093/aob/mcs083, available online at www.aob.oxfordjournals.org Phylogenetics of tribe Orchideae (Orchidaceae: Orchidoideae) based on combined DNA matrices: inferences regarding timing of diversification and evolution of pollination syndromes Luis A. Inda1,*, Manuel Pimentel2 and Mark W. Chase3 1Escuela Polite´cnica Superior de Huesca, Universidad de Zaragoza, carretera de Cuarte sn. 22071 Huesca, Spain, 2Facultade de Ciencias, Universidade da Corun˜a, Campus da Zapateira sn. 15071 A Corun˜a, Spain and 3Jodrell Laboratory, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 3DS, UK * For correspondence. E-mail [email protected] Received: 3 November 2011 Returned for revision: 9 December 2011 Accepted: 1 March 2012 Published electronically: 25 April 2012 † Background and aims Tribe Orchideae (Orchidaceae: Orchidoideae) comprises around 62 mostly terrestrial genera, which are well represented in the Northern Temperate Zone and less frequently in tropical areas of both the Old and New Worlds. Phylogenetic relationships within this tribe have been studied previously using only nuclear ribosomal DNA (nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer, nrITS). However, different parts of the phylogenetic tree in these analyses were weakly supported, and integrating information from different plant genomes is clearly necessary in orchids, where reticulate evolution events are putatively common. The aims of this study were to: (1) obtain a well-supported and dated phylogenetic hypothesis for tribe Orchideae, (ii) assess appropriateness of recent nomenclatural changes in this tribe in the last decade, (3) detect possible examples of reticulate evolution and (4) analyse in a temporal context evolutionary trends for subtribe Orchidinae with special emphasis on pollination systems.
    [Show full text]
  • In Vitro Symbiotic Culture Studies of Some Orchid Species Bazı Orkide
    Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi Journal of Agricultural Sciences Tar. Bil. Der. Dergi web sayfası: Journal homepage: www.agri.ankara.edu.tr/dergi www.agri.ankara.edu.tr/journal In vitro Symbiotic Culture Studies of Some Orchid Species Arzu ab ÇIĞ , Hüdai YILMAZ aSiirt University, Agriculture Faculty, Department of Horticulture, Kezer Campus, Siirt, TURKEY bPamukkale University, School of Applied Sciences, Denizli, TURKEY ARTICLE INFO Research Article DOI: 10.15832/ankutbd.385859 23 (2017) 453-463 Corresponding Author: Arzu ÇIĞ, E-mail: [email protected], Tel: +90 (531) 623 15 33 Received: 27 August 2014, Received in Revised Form: 19 February 2016, Accepted: 16 September 2017 ABSTRACT This study investigated the formation of protocorms and shoots from in vitro cultured seeds of Dactylorhiza iberica (Bieb. ex Willd.) Soó, D. umbrosa (Kar. and Kir.) Nevski, and Orchis palustris Jacquin. Culture conditions included binucleate Rhizoctonia and Rhizoctonia solani isolates, which were symbiotic cultures isolated from the tubers of these plants, and culture media consisting of an oat medium (OM) or a modified oat medium (MOM). The shortest times for protocorm and shoot development of D. umbrosa sowed in OM were 42.67 and 66 days, respectively. The highest rate of protocorm development and the lowest percentage of formation of darkened protocorms in D. umbrosa were 60% (in OM) and 2.99% (in MOM), respectively. The maximum percentage of shoots obtained from protocorms was 35.04% for D. iberica cultured in OM. All data were obtained using binucleate Rhizoctonia sp. inoculates in the nutrient media. Keywords: In vitro; Orchid; Protocorm; Rhizoctonia spp.; Shoot Bazı Orkide Türlerinin in vitro Simbiyotik Kültür Çalışmaları ESER BİLGİSİ SCIENCES JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL Araştırma Makalesi — Sorumlu Yazar: Arzu ÇIĞ, E-posta: [email protected], Tel: +90 (531) 623 15 33 Geliş Tarihi: 27 Ağustos 2014, Düzeltmelerin Gelişi: 19 Şubat 2016, Kabul: 16 Eylül 2017 ÖZET Bu çalışmada Dactylorhiza iberica (Bieb.
    [Show full text]
  • Forma Nov.: a New Peloric Orchid from Ibaraki Prefecture, Japan
    The Japanese Society for Plant Systematics ISSN 1346-7565 Acta Phytotax. Geobot. 65 (3): 127–139 (2014) Cephalanthera falcata f. conformis (Orchidaceae) forma nov.: A New Peloric Orchid from Ibaraki Prefecture, Japan 1,* 1 1 HirosHi Hayakawa , CHiHiro Hayakawa , yosHinobu kusumoto , tomoko 1 1 2 3,4 nisHida , Hiroaki ikeda , tatsuya Fukuda and Jun yokoyama 1National Institute for Agro-Environmental Sciences, 3-1-3 Kannondai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8604, Japan. *[email protected] (author for correspondences); 2Faculty of Agriculture, Kochi University, Nan- koku, Kochi 783-8502, Japan; 3Faculty of Science, Yamagata University, Kojirakawa, Yamagata 990-8560, Japan; 4Institute for Regional Innovation, Yamagata University, Kaminoyama, Yamagata 999-3101, Japan We recognize a new peloric form of the orchid Cephalanthera falcata (Thunb.) Blume f. conformis Hi- ros. Hayak. et J. Yokoy., which occurs in the vicinity of the Tsukuba mountain range in Ibaraki Prefec- ture, Japan. This peloric form is sympatric with C. falcata f. falcata. The peloric flowers have a petal-like lip. The flowers are radially symmetrical and the perianth parts spread weakly compared to normal flow- ers. The stigmas are positioned at the column apex, thus neighboring stigmas and the lower parts of the pollinia are conglutinated. We observed similar vegetative traits among C. falcata f. falcata, C. falcata f. albescens S. Kobayashi, and C. falcata f. conformis. The floral morphology in C. falcata f. conformis resembles that of C. nanchuanica (S.C. Chen) X.H. Jin et X.G. Xiang (i.e., similar petal-like lip and stig- ma position at the column apex; syn. Tangtsinia nanchuanica S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Wildlife Travel Burren 2018
    The Burren 2018 species list and trip report, 7th-12th June 2018 WILDLIFE TRAVEL The Burren 2018 s 1 The Burren 2018 species list and trip report, 7th-12th June 2018 Day 1: 7th June: Arrive in Lisdoonvarna; supper at Rathbaun Hotel Arriving by a variety of routes and means, we all gathered at Caherleigh House by 6pm, sustained by a round of fresh tea, coffee and delightful home-made scones from our ever-helpful host, Dermot. After introductions and some background to the geology and floral elements in the Burren from Brian (stressing the Mediterranean component of the flora after a day’s Mediterranean heat and sun), we made our way to the Rathbaun, for some substantial and tasty local food and our first taste of Irish music from the three young ladies of Ceolan, and their energetic four-hour performance (not sure any of us had the stamina to stay to the end). Day 2: 8th June: Poulsallach At 9am we were collected by Tony, our driver from Glynn’s Coaches for the week, and following a half-hour drive we arrived at a coastal stretch of species-rich limestone pavement which represented the perfect introduction to the Burren’s flora: a stunningly beautiful mix of coastal, Mediterranean, Atlantic and Arctic-Alpine species gathered together uniquely in a natural rock garden. First impressions were of patchy grassland, sparkling with heath spotted- orchids Dactylorhiza maculata ericetorum and drifts of the ubiquitous and glowing-purple bloody crane’s-bill Geranium sanguineum, between bare rock. A closer look revealed a diverse and colourful tapestry of dozens of flowers - the yellows of goldenrod Solidago virgaurea, kidney-vetch Anthyllis vulneraria, and bird’s-foot trefoil Lotus corniculatus (and its attendant common blue butterflies Polyommatus Icarus), pink splashes of wild thyme Thymus polytrichus and the hairy local subspecies of lousewort Pedicularis sylvatica ssp.
    [Show full text]
  • “Dynamic Speciation Processes in the Mediterranean Orchid Genus Ophrys L
    “DYNAMIC SPECIATION PROCESSES IN THE MEDITERRANEAN ORCHID GENUS OPHRYS L. (ORCHIDACEAE)” Tesi di Dottorato in Biologia Avanzata, XXIV ciclo (Indirizzo Sistematica Molecolare) Universitá degli Studi di Napoli Federico II Facoltá di Scienze Matematiche, Fisiche e Naturali Dipartimento di Biologia Strutturale e Funzionale 1st supervisor: Prof. Salvatore Cozzolino 2nd supervisor: Prof. Serena Aceto PhD student: Dott. Hendrik Breitkopf 1 Cover picture: Pseudo-copulation of a Colletes cunicularius male on a flower of Ophrys exaltata ssp. archipelagi (Marina di Lesina, Italy. H. Breitkopf, 2011). 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS GENERAL INTRODUCTION CHAPTER 1: MULTI-LOCUS NUCLEAR GENE PHYLOGENY OF THE SEXUALLY DECEPTIVE ORCHID GENUS OPHRYS L. (ORCHIDACEAE) CHAPTER 2: ANALYSIS OF VARIATION AND SPECIATION IN THE OPHRYS SPHEGODES SPECIES COMPLEX CHAPTER 3: FLORAL ISOLATION IS THE MAIN REPRODUCTIVE BARRIER AMONG CLOSELY RELATED SEXUALLY DECEPTIVE ORCHIDS CHAPTER 4: SPECIATION BY DISTURBANCE: A POPULATION STUDY OF CENTRAL ITALIAN OPHRYS SPHEGODES LINEAGES CONTRIBUTION OF CO-AUTHORS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 3 GENERAL INTRODUCTION ORCHIDS With more than 22.000 accepted species in 880 genera (Pridgeon et al. 1999), the family of the Orchidaceae is the largest family of angiosperm plants. Recently discovered fossils document their existence for at least 15 Ma. The last common ancestor of all orchids has been estimated to exist about 80 Ma ago (Ramirez et al. 2007, Gustafsson et al. 2010). Orchids are cosmopolitan, distributed on all continents and a great variety of habitats, ranging from deserts and swamps to arctic regions. Two large groups can be distinguished: Epiphytic and epilithic orchids attach themselves with aerial roots to trees or stones, mostly halfway between the ground and the upper canopy where they absorb water through the velamen of their roots.
    [Show full text]
  • Phytogeographical Analysis and Ecological Factors of the Distribution of Orchidaceae Taxa in the Western Carpathians (Local Study)
    plants Article Phytogeographical Analysis and Ecological Factors of the Distribution of Orchidaceae Taxa in the Western Carpathians (Local study) Lukáš Wittlinger and Lucia Petrikoviˇcová * Department of Geography and Regional Development, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Constantine the Philosopher University in Nitra, 94974 Nitra, Slovakia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +421-907-3441-04 Abstract: In the years 2018–2020, we carried out large-scale mapping in the Western Carpathians with a focus on determining the biodiversity of taxa of the family Orchidaceae using field biogeographical research. We evaluated the research using phytogeographic analysis with an emphasis on selected ecological environmental factors (substrate: ecological land unit value, soil reaction (pH), terrain: slope (◦), flow and hydrogeological productivity (m2.s−1) and average annual amounts of global radiation (kWh.m–2). A total of 19 species were found in the area, of which the majority were Cephalenthera longifolia, Cephalenthera damasonium and Anacamptis morio. Rare findings included Epipactis muelleri, Epipactis leptochila and Limodorum abortivum. We determined the ecological demands of the abiotic environment of individual species by means of a functional analysis of communities. The research confirmed that most of the orchids that were studied occurred in acidified, calcified and basophil locations. From the location of the distribution of individual populations, it is clear that they are generally arranged compactly and occasionally scattered, which results in ecological and environmental diversity. During the research, we identified 129 localities with the occurrence of Citation: Wittlinger, L.; Petrikoviˇcová, L. Phytogeographical Analysis and 19 species and subspecies of orchids. We identify the main factors that threaten them and propose Ecological Factors of the Distribution specific measures to protect vulnerable populations.
    [Show full text]
  • Orchid Historical Biogeography, Diversification, Antarctica and The
    Journal of Biogeography (J. Biogeogr.) (2016) ORIGINAL Orchid historical biogeography, ARTICLE diversification, Antarctica and the paradox of orchid dispersal Thomas J. Givnish1*, Daniel Spalink1, Mercedes Ames1, Stephanie P. Lyon1, Steven J. Hunter1, Alejandro Zuluaga1,2, Alfonso Doucette1, Giovanny Giraldo Caro1, James McDaniel1, Mark A. Clements3, Mary T. K. Arroyo4, Lorena Endara5, Ricardo Kriebel1, Norris H. Williams5 and Kenneth M. Cameron1 1Department of Botany, University of ABSTRACT Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, Aim Orchidaceae is the most species-rich angiosperm family and has one of USA, 2Departamento de Biologıa, the broadest distributions. Until now, the lack of a well-resolved phylogeny has Universidad del Valle, Cali, Colombia, 3Centre for Australian National Biodiversity prevented analyses of orchid historical biogeography. In this study, we use such Research, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia, a phylogeny to estimate the geographical spread of orchids, evaluate the impor- 4Institute of Ecology and Biodiversity, tance of different regions in their diversification and assess the role of long-dis- Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Chile, tance dispersal (LDD) in generating orchid diversity. 5 Santiago, Chile, Department of Biology, Location Global. University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA Methods Analyses use a phylogeny including species representing all five orchid subfamilies and almost all tribes and subtribes, calibrated against 17 angiosperm fossils. We estimated historical biogeography and assessed the
    [Show full text]