New Kosciuszko Bridge – Transforming the New York City Skyline

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

New Kosciuszko Bridge – Transforming the New York City Skyline FEATURE ARTICLE Custom fabricated picking and suspension ring New Kosciuszko Bridge – Transforming the New York City Skyline The Kosciuszko Bridge, named in honor of notorious locally for its state of structural The new Kosciuszko Bridge is designed Polish military engineer and Revolutionary disrepair and severe congestion. as a cable-stayed structure, the first of its War hero Tadeusz Kosciuszko, carries I- In May 2013, the New York State kind in New York City. The approach span 278 over Newtown Creek, the dividing line Department of Transportation (NYSDOT) piers and connector abutments, not between the New York City boroughs of awarded a design-build contract to the discussed in this article, are supported Brooklyn and Queens. At the time of the joint venture of Skanska USA Civil primarily by driven piles, along with a bridge’s construction in 1939, Newtown Northeast, Kiewit Infrastructure Company limited number of micropiles at several Creek was an industrial hotbed lined with and ECCO III Enterprises (SKE), in abutments constructed under low- petroleum refineries, coal handling conjunction with design partner HNTB headroom conditions. At the center pylon, facilities, metal processors, and chemical New York Engineering and Architecture. rock-socketed drilled shafts of and fertilizer manufacturers. The waterway The project scope includes design and unprecedented size and capacity within the became one of the largest shipping hubs in construction of a new eastbound bridge metropolitan area were the signature feature the Northeast, and to accommodate the and improvements along a 1.1 mi (1.8 km) of the project’s deep foundation work. maritime traffic, the existing Kosciuszko segment of the Brooklyn-Queens Bridge was constructed with a fixed span Expressway (BQE), as well as demolition of Subsurface Profile 125 ft (38.1 m) above the mean high water the existing bridge. With the exception of In the area of the center pylon, on the west level. This resulted in a structure that now some minor replaceable items, the bridge bank of Newtown Creek, the general soil features nonstandard roadway grades on has a required 100-year design service life. profile consists of approximately 20 ft (6m) both approach spans, inadequate sight A new westbound (Brooklyn-bound) of urban fill overlying a thin organic clay distances across the main span and bridge, built within the footprint of the layer, then glacial deposits composed of entrance ramps with insufficient merge existing Kosciuszko Bridge, will be silty sand with gravel and a lower clay layer lengths. Serving more than 160,000 completed under a separate contract. known as the Raritan Formation. Beneath vehicles per day, the bridge has become lies a layer of decomposed rock, consisting AUTHOR Nolan S. Kealy, P.E., Foundations Manager, Skanska-Kiewit-ECCO III Joint Venture DEEP FOUNDATIONS • SEPT/OCT 2015 • 87 heavy metals in concentrations exceeding critical to the project schedule to allow the Once the casings were sealed and this phase of the work had to be performed employed to determine the depth of acceptable limits set forth by the New York use of reverse circulation drilling (RCD) grouted, RCD was used to excavate each 6.5 as a two-shift operation during the dead of sediment present at the tip of each State Department of Environmental methods to excavate the socket length. ft (2 m) rock socket. The pile top rotary table winter in order to maintain the project completed shaft. Five individual bottom Conservation (NYSDEC). Above the water Installation methods were revised to spun a 67.5 ton (61 tonne) drill string, schedule. Temperatures typically rose locations per shaft were probed, with the table, the soils were also classified as highly incorporate an oversized 8 ft (2.4 m) including a full-faced roller cutting bit above freezing for only a few hours each requirement that 50% of the base of each corrosive, with an expected steel loss of diameter shaft supported by polymer slurry. attached to the bottom. In the reverse day, requiring a significant effort to keep shaft have less than 0.5 in (13 mm) of 4.56 mils (0.12 mm) per year. A 162,000 gal (613 m3) slurry plant was circulation process, compressed air is pumps running and prevent supply and sediment and no location exceeding 1.5 in mobilized to the site to batch and hold KB injected into the bottom of the drill string, discharge piping from icing up. (38 mm) at the time of concrete placement. Drilled Shaft Construction International’s Enhanced SlurryPro CDP creating a pressure differential that airlifts Due to the depth of the shafts, rein- To meet these criteria, each shaft was To support the nearly 300 ft (91.4 m) tall system. A Liebherr LB44 hydraulic rotary cuttings back to the surface. Flowrates on forcing cages were constructed in three airlifted, removing any fines leftover from center pylons, a total of eight drilled shafts drill rig was used to install surface casing the order of 2,000 gpm (7,570 Lpm) are sections, using internal template rings the RCD and exchanging the entire fluid were required — four at each footing. Each and excavate the overburden. The typically generated by this type of system. attached to “hourglass” stiffening frames. column with fresh water. Further, during shaft required a nominal resistance of temporary 8.5 ft (2.6 m) casing was However, strict environmental regulations The fully assembled cage contained 18 No. construction of the first shaft, after a 22,000 kips (97,861 kN) in compression installed 40 ft (12.2 m) and seated into the prohibited any water to be supplied from or 18 75 ksi (517 MPa) vertical bars, with successful Mini-SID inspection was and 2,900 kips (12,900 kN) in tension. The upper clay layer to prevent any possibility of discharged into the nearby Newtown Creek bundled bars in the upper 60 ft (18.3 m) achieved, a 72-hour waiting period was shafts were cased through the overburden vertical migration of shallow contaminates without first being treated to bring heavy and weighed nearly 50 tons (45.5 tonnes). imposed and the shaft inspection process soils using a 7 ft (2.1 m) inner diameter cas- into the lower aquifer. metals, pH and solids down to acceptable Custom designed and built lifting rings were repeated. This demonstration alleviated ing, with a 6.5 ft (2 m) diameter rock socket During the drilling process, each shaft levels. Instead, all flushing water was used to pick and suspend the cage sections concerns that the shafts could fall out of drilled 13 ft (4 m) below the casing tip. was profiled multiple times using a supplied from nearby hydrants and during splicing and concrete placement. specification if a weekend or unexpected SoniCaliper® provided by Loadtest to recirculated in a continuous loop, settling Although the concrete supplier’s ready- downtime period occurred between the confirm verticality of the open hole. Depths out the rock cuttings in a lined detention mix plant was located only about 2 mi (3.2 km) time of the Mini-SID inspection and to rock varied from 147 ft (44.8 m) to 170 ft pond. Further complicating the installation, from the site, local Brooklyn traffic would concrete placement. (51.8 m), but careful control of the drilling frequently push delivery times to 45 A “Chicago Method” Osterberg Cell (O- process yielded minimal vertical deviations minutes or more. A 6,000 psi (41.3 MPa) cell) load test, performed on the first ranging from 0.34% to 0.76%. Once rock self-consolidating concrete (SCC) mix, completed production shaft, was then was encountered, it was drilled and leveled developed for previous Skanska pro- carried out to confirm the design end- with conventional tooling. This was a time jects, was chosen for its ease of worka- bearing assumptions. This variation on the consuming, but critical step in the construc- bility and extended placement time. traditional O-cell test places the hydraulic tion process. Casing was then lowered into jack at the shaft tip with a circular bottom the open hole in sections ranging from 50 ft Quality Control plate of a reduced diameter compared to the (15.2 m) to 80 ft (24.4 m) using a Liebherr Since the shaft design relied on end rock socket. Unit end-bearing values are LR1350 service crane. Two full-penetration bearing to provide nearly 80% of its able to be verified by a single 6,000 kip welded splices were required per shaft, with capacity, ensuring cleanliness of the (26,689 kN) capacity O-cell jack, which the fully-deployed casing string weighing as rock socket bottom prior to pouring applies load onto the smaller diameter plate much as 48.5 tons (44 tonnes). This casing concrete was paramount. A miniature using the available side shear capacity and Overburden drilling adjacent to the existing bridge was surveyed into place, then twisted and shaft inspection device (Mini-SID) was dead weight of the shaft above as a reaction. seated into the bedrock. The seal in rock of undisturbed natural bedrock that has Once the project was awarded, SKE was confirmed when a head differential in been chemically weathered. The result is an began a soil boring program to provide a the slurry level of about 10 ft (3 m), created extremely stiff green clayey soil with SPT more comprehensive study of the by pumping down the inside of the casing, values from 50 to over 100 blows per foot subsurface conditions than the contract bid could be maintained. (0.3 m). The competent rock below borings provided. Additional borings in the One caveat of this installation method consists of Fordham Gneiss with pegmatite area of the drilled shaft footings confirmed was that once the casing was installed, an inclusions.
Recommended publications
  • New York City Comprehensive Waterfront Plan
    NEW YORK CITY CoMPREHENSWE WATERFRONT PLAN Reclaiming the City's Edge For Public Discussion Summer 1992 DAVID N. DINKINS, Mayor City of New lVrk RICHARD L. SCHAFFER, Director Department of City Planning NYC DCP 92-27 NEW YORK CITY COMPREHENSIVE WATERFRONT PLAN CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMA RY 1 INTRODUCTION: SETTING THE COURSE 1 2 PLANNING FRA MEWORK 5 HISTORICAL CONTEXT 5 LEGAL CONTEXT 7 REGULATORY CONTEXT 10 3 THE NATURAL WATERFRONT 17 WATERFRONT RESOURCES AND THEIR SIGNIFICANCE 17 Wetlands 18 Significant Coastal Habitats 21 Beaches and Coastal Erosion Areas 22 Water Quality 26 THE PLAN FOR THE NATURAL WATERFRONT 33 Citywide Strategy 33 Special Natural Waterfront Areas 35 4 THE PUBLIC WATERFRONT 51 THE EXISTING PUBLIC WATERFRONT 52 THE ACCESSIBLE WATERFRONT: ISSUES AND OPPORTUNITIES 63 THE PLAN FOR THE PUBLIC WATERFRONT 70 Regulatory Strategy 70 Public Access Opportunities 71 5 THE WORKING WATERFRONT 83 HISTORY 83 THE WORKING WATERFRONT TODAY 85 WORKING WATERFRONT ISSUES 101 THE PLAN FOR THE WORKING WATERFRONT 106 Designation Significant Maritime and Industrial Areas 107 JFK and LaGuardia Airport Areas 114 Citywide Strategy fo r the Wo rking Waterfront 115 6 THE REDEVELOPING WATER FRONT 119 THE REDEVELOPING WATERFRONT TODAY 119 THE IMPORTANCE OF REDEVELOPMENT 122 WATERFRONT DEVELOPMENT ISSUES 125 REDEVELOPMENT CRITERIA 127 THE PLAN FOR THE REDEVELOPING WATERFRONT 128 7 WATER FRONT ZONING PROPOSAL 145 WATERFRONT AREA 146 ZONING LOTS 147 CALCULATING FLOOR AREA ON WATERFRONTAGE loTS 148 DEFINITION OF WATER DEPENDENT & WATERFRONT ENHANCING USES
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix E: History and Projection of Traffic, Toll Revenues And
    APPENDIX E HISTORY AND PROJECTION OF TRAFFIC, TOLL REVENUES AND EXPENSES and Review of Physical Conditions of the Facilities of Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority April 26, 2013 Prepared for the Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority A Constituent Agency of the Metropolitan Transportation Authority By TABLE OF CONTENTS Page TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE ............................................................................. E-1 Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority (TBTA) .......................................................... E-1 Metropolitan Area Arterial Network ............................................................................... E-3 Other Regional Toll Facilities .......................................................................................... E-4 Regional Public Transportation ....................................................................................... E-5 TOLL COLLECTION ON THE TBTA FACILITIES ................................................................ E-5 Present and Proposed Toll Structures and Operation ...................................................... E-5 E-ZPass Electronic Toll Collection System ..................................................................... E-8 TBTA‘s Role in E-ZPass ............................................................................................... E-10 Passenger Car Toll Rate Trends and Inflation ............................................................... E-11 HISTORICAL TRAFFIC, REVENUES AND EXPENSES AND ESTIMATED/BUDGETED NUMBERS
    [Show full text]
  • $223,355,000 Triborough Bridge and TUNNEL Authority Lehman
    NEW ISSUE BOOK-ENTRY-ONLY $223,355,000 TRIBOROUGH BRIDGE AND TUNNEL AutHORITY (MTA Bridges and Tunnels) General Revenue Bonds, Series 2007A DATED: Date of Delivery DUE: November 15, as shown on the inside cover The Series 2007A Bonds are being issued to finance bridge and tunnel projects. The Series 2007A Bonds – • are general obligations of MTA Bridges and Tunnels, payable generally from the net revenues collected on the bridges and tunnels operated by MTA Bridges and Tunnels as described herein, and • are not a debt of the State or The City of New York or any other local government unit. MTA Bridges and Tunnels has no taxing power. In the opinion of Hawkins Delafield & Wood LLP, Bond Counsel to MTA Bridges and Tunnels, under existing law and relying on certain representations by MTA Bridges and Tunnels and assuming the compliance by MTA Bridges and Tunnels with certain covenants, interest on the Series 2007A Bonds is • excluded from a bondholder’s federal gross income under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, • not a preference item for a bondholder under the federal alternative minimum tax, and • included in the adjusted current earnings of a corporation under the federal corporate alternative minimum tax. Also in Bond Counsel’s opinion, under existing law, interest on the Series 2007A Bonds is exempt from personal income taxes of New York State or any political subdivisions of the State, including The City of New York. The Series 2007A Bonds are subject to redemption prior to maturity as described herein. The Series 2007A Bonds are offered when, as, and if issued, subject to certain conditions, and are expected to be delivered through the facilities of The Depository Trust Company, on or about June 20, 2007.
    [Show full text]
  • Client Service and Attention Drive Carl Schipfmann's
    CLIENT SERVICE AND ATTENTION DRIVE CARL SCHIPFMANN’S LEADERSHIP Schipfmann takes responsibility for HNTB’s reputation when delivering bridge projects to clients. Whether you are his client, supervisor, coworker or friend, Carl Schipfmann is going to present you with his genuine self. With a reputation as a dynamic leader, Schipfmann dedicates himself to his projects by embedding himself into their intricate, day-to-day details. Schipfmann is a veteran bridge project manager in the Kansas City office whose expertise includes bridge design, inspection and construction administration. He currently serves on the Kansas City design team that is working on the cable-stayed unit of the Kosciuszko Bridge Replacement, a New York City design-build project replacing the bridge spanning New Town Creek between Brooklyn and Queens. He has served HNTB on many bridge-related design projects over the past 22 years, and has provided shop drawing review and answered requests for information to provide clarification on numerous projects, all within schedule constraints. “Carl loves to get in and get his hands dirty with the design,” said Marc Whitmore, project CARL schipFMANN PROJECT MANAGER manager in the Kansas City office. “He thrives on the challenge of figuring out how to KANSAS CITY OFFICE design and build different components of his projects and really shines when handling technical issues.” DETAIL-ORIENTED LEADERSHIP Schipfmann’s bridge teams seem to respond well to his leadership style, which is as much relationship-oriented as anything else. Rather than listening to him bark out orders, his teams become closely knit while learning from the example of his attention to detail and dedication to client service.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 New York City Bridge Traffic Volumes
    2016 New York City Bridge Traffic Volumes TM NEW YORK CITY Bill de Blasio Polly Trottenberg Mayor Commissioner A member of the New York Metropolitan Transportation Council 2016 New York City Bridge Traffic Volumes Contract C033467 2014-2015: PTDT14D00.E01 2015-2016: PTDT15D00.E01 2016-2017: PTDT16D00.E02 2017-2018: PTDT17D00.E02 The preparation of this report has been financed through the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Federal Transit Administration and Federal Highway Administration. This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the New York Metropolitan Transportation Council in the interest of information exchange. The contents of this report reflect the views of the authors who are responsible for the facts and accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the Federal Transit Administration, Federal Highway Administration or the State of New York. This report does not constitute a standard, specification or regulation. NYCDOT is grateful to the Metropolitan Transportation Authority Bridges and Tunnels (MTABT), the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey (PANYNJ), and the New York Metropolitan Transportation Council (NYMTC) for providing data used to develop this report. This 2016 New York City Bridge Traffic Volumes Report was funded through the New York Metropolitan Transportation Council SFY 2017 Unified Planning Work Program project, Data Management PTDT17D00.E02, which was funded through matching grants from the Federal Transit Administration and from the Federal Highway Administration. Title VI Statement The New York Metropolitan Transportation Council is committed to compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987, and all related rules and statutes.
    [Show full text]
  • Kosciuszko Bridge Project Pin X729.77.123
    DRAFT NEPA SCOPING MEMORANDUM: DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT KOSCIUSZKO BRIDGE PROJECT PIN X729.77.123 Project Limits Brooklyn-Queens Expressway (BQE)/Interstate 278 Between Morgan Avenue and the Long Island Expressway (LIE) Interchange Kings and Queens Counties April 2002 New York State U.S. Department of Transportation Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Kosciuszko Bridge Project Draft NEPA Scoping Memorandum I. Introduction The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), in cooperation with the New York State Department of Transportation (NYSDOT), will prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) that will study and document possible improvements to the Kosciuszko Bridge, focusing on a 1.1-mile segment of the Brooklyn-Queens Expressway (BQE) portion of I-278, from Morgan Avenue in Kings County to the Long Island Expressway (LIE) interchange in Queens County. In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the New York State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA), a public "scoping" process will be conducted to identify the social, economic, and environmental issues to be evaluated in a Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS). This process ensures that the DEIS is a concise, accurate and comprehensive document that covers all concerns and issues for public and agency review. This Draft Scoping Memorandum is one of the first steps in the preparation of the DEIS for the Kosciuszko Bridge Project. It presents: (1) background information on the project, (2) the types of alternatives to be considered and the methods to be used to select alternatives for consideration in the DEIS, and (3) the projected procedures and methodologies to be followed in the preparation of the DEIS.
    [Show full text]
  • Governor Andrew M. Cuomo Thursday, August 1, 2019
    Governor Andrew M. Cuomo Thursday, August 1, 2019 9:28 AM Wheels up Albany en route Oswego County Airport Aircraft: NYSP Helicopter Passengers: Governor Andrew M. Cuomo Kelly Cummings, Director of State Operations & Infrastructure John Maggiore, Senior Advisor to the Governor Protective Services incl. Capt. V. Straface State Purposes: The Governor flew from Albany to Oswego to participate in a Lake Ontario tourism event with the Attorney General. Mixed Use: No Reimbursed: No 10:28 AM Wheels down Oswego County Airport 11:15 AM Lake Ontario Fishing Trip with Attorney General Letitia James Location: Port of Oswego 1 East 2nd Street Oswego, NY 13126 1:45 PM Press Conference with Attorney General Letitia James regarding Lake Ontario Tourism Location: Port of Oswego 1 East 2nd Street Oswego, NY 13126 3:08 PM Wheels up Oswego County Airport en route Albany Aircraft: NYSP Helicopter Passengers: Governor Andrew M. Cuomo Kelly Cummings, Director of State Operations & Infrastructure John Maggiore, Senior Advisor to the Governor Protective Services incl. Capt. V. Straface State Purposes: The Governor flew from Oswego to Albany to end his day. Mixed Use: No Reimbursed: No 4:08 PM Wheels down Albany **** OTHER EXECUTIVE USE OF STATE AIRCRAFT 10:16 AM Wheels up LaGuardia International Airport en route Oswego County Airport Aircraft: NYSP King Air Passengers: Dani Lever, Director of Communications NYS Attorney General Letitia James Ibrahim Khan, Chief of Staff to the Attorney General Delaney Kempner, Sr. Communications Advisor to the Attorney General Hector Fuentes, LE Advisor to the Attorney General 1 State Purposes: Attorney General Letitia James flew from NYC to Oswego to participate in a Lake Ontario tourism event and press conference with the Governor.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix E History and Projection of Traffic
    APPENDIX E HISTORY AND PROJECTION OF TRAFFIC, TOLL REVENUES AND EXPENSES and Review of Physical Conditions Of the Facilities of Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority April 29, 2008 Prepared for the Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority By TABLE OF CONTENTS Page TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE .............................................................................E-1 Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority (TBTA)..........................................................E-1 Metropolitan Area Arterial Network ...............................................................................E-3 Other Regional Toll Facilities..........................................................................................E-4 Regional Public Transportation .......................................................................................E-4 TOLL COLLECTION ON THE TBTA FACILITIES................................................................E-5 Current Toll Structure and Operation ..............................................................................E-5 E-ZPass Electronic Toll Collection System ....................................................................E-7 TBTA’s Role in E-ZPass.................................................................................................E-9 Passenger Car Toll Rate Trends and Inflation .................................................................E-9 HISTORICAL TRAFFIC, REVENUES AND EXPENSES AND ESTIMATED/BUDGETED NUMBERS FOR 2008 ..............................................................................................................E-12
    [Show full text]
  • Kosciuszko Bridge Brooklyn, New York
    CASE STUDY Kosciuszko Bridge Brooklyn, New York HISTORY The Kosciuszko Bridge has a long and storied history. The first bridge on the site, built in 1803, connected Meeker Street in Brooklyn to Review Avenue and Laurel Hill Blvd. in Queens. Several replacement bridges have come and gone, with the most recent being a cable- stayed bridge that replaced the deteriorating truss bridge built in 1939. PROBLEM Traffic on and around the Kosciuszko Bridge in Brooklyn has been a problem for years. The 1939 bridge was built to serve up to 10,000 cars a day. However, when it became part of the Interstate Highway System in 1965, traffic flowing across the bridge was up to 18 times that number. In 2009, the New York State Department of Transportation decided to replace the aging structure with a new bridge. Two structures would be built. The first, a new 5-lane eastbound span constructed parallel to the old structure. In April 2017, the eastbound edges are then simultaneously heated with a structure opened with 2-way traffic, allowing high frequency current and squeezed together PROJECT PARTNERS the older bridge to be demolished and to produce a bond. The longitudinal ERW seam Owner construction to begin on the second structure, does not require filler metal while impurities in New York State Department of Transportation – Albany, NY a new westbound span. the heat affected zone are extruded during the welding process. General Contractor SOLUTION Granite Construction Company – The ERW pipe piles used for the pier footings Watsonville, CA Granite Construction Company was the were all produced by Nucor Skyline’s new contractor on the second bridge span, ERW mill.
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 New York City Bridge Traffic Volumes
    2015 New York City Bridge Traffic Volumes TM NEW YORK CITY Bill de Blasio Polly Trottenberg Mayor Commissioner A member of the New York Metropolitan Transportation Council 2015 New York City Bridge Traffic Volumes Contract C033467 2014-2015: PTDT14D00.E01 2015-2016: PTDT15D00.E01 The preparation of this report was financed in part with funds from the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, under the Federal Highway Act of 1956, as amended, and the Urban Mass Transportation Act of 1964, as amended. This document is disseminated by the New York City Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. It reflects the views of the New York City Department of Transportation (NYCDOT), which is responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the data presented herein. The report does not necessarily reflect any official views or policies of the Federal Transit Administration, the Federal Highway Administration, or the State of New York. The report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation. NYCDOT is grateful to the Metropolitan Transportation Authority Bridges and Tunnels (MTABT), the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey (PANYNJ), and the New York Metropolitan Transportation Council (NYMTC) for providing data used to develop this report. Prepared by: New York City Department of Transportation Polly Trottenberg Commissioner Margaret Forgione Chief Operating Officer Joseph Jarrin, Executive Deputy Commissioner for Strategic and Agency Services Ryan Russo Deputy Commissioner Charles Ukegbu, Assistant Commissioner, Regional & Strategic Planning Naim Rasheed Senior Director, Traffic Engineering & Planning Alexander M. Keating Director of Special Projects Richard P. Roan Special Projects Danny Yoder Special Projects Published October 2016 2015 NEW YORK CITY BRIDGE TRAFFIC VOLUMES 2,661,105 5.8% Decrease (‐6,428 Daily vehicles per day used the 47 toll‐free Vehicles) bridges monitored by the New York City Department of Transportation in Williamsburg Bridge over the East 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    Corridors Vehicle Speed Data - 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS County Corridor From Street To Street Page BRONX Appendix A Inerstate I‐278 Triborough Bridge I‐95 A‐15 Inerstate I‐87 Westchester County Line I‐278 A‐2 Inerstate I‐95 New York County Line Westchester County Line A‐14 Bronx River Pkwy Inerstate I‐278 Westchester County Line A‐13 TOC Boston Rd Bronx River Pkwy Ropes Ave A‐12 1 Boston Rd 3rd Ave E Tremont Ave A‐1 Bruckner Blvd Inerstate I‐87 Westchester Ave A‐16 Edward L Grant Hwy/Dr M. L. King Jerome Ave W Kingsbridge Rd A‐4 Fordham Rd New York County Line Boston Rd A‐10 Grand Concours e E 138th St Mosholu Pkwy S A‐6 Gun Hill Rd Gun Hill Pkwy Inerstate I‐95 A‐7 Jerome Ave/Central Park Ave E 204th St Westchester County Line A‐8 Jerome Ave/Macombs Dam Bridge W 169th St New York County Line A‐5 Tremont Ave Sedgwick Ave Williamsbridge Rd A‐11 Webster Ave/Melrose Ave 3rd Ave Westchester Ave A‐9 Westchester Ave 3rd Ave Inerstate I‐95 A‐3 KINGS Appendix B Inerstate I‐278 Verrazanno Bridge Kosciuszko Bridge B‐11 Atlantic Avenue 6th Ave Queens County Line B‐2 Belt Pkwy Inerstate I‐278 Queens County Line B‐5 Bushwick Ave Maspeth Ave Pennsylvania Ave B‐6 Conduit Blvd Atlantic Ave Queens County Line B‐7 State Hwy 27 Inerstate I‐278 Ocean Pkwy B‐20 Williamsburg Bridge Inerstate I‐278 Clinton St (Manhattan) B‐22 Fort Hamilton Pkwy Marine Ave State Hwy 27 B‐9 4th Ave Flatbush Ave Shore Rd B‐1 Avenue U Stillwell Ave Mill Ave B‐3 Bedford Ave Division Ave Emmons Ave B‐4 N E W Y O R K C I T Flatbush Ave/Marine Pkwy Bridge Manhattan Bridge Rockaway Point
    [Show full text]
  • Download the List
    NEW YORK–AREA WORLDWIDE ENGINEERS ENGINEERS 2019 FIRMWIDE COMPANY/ PHONE NUMBER/ 2019/ 2019/ REVENUE NEW YORK–AREA SERVICE MIX RANK ADDRESS WEBSITE SENIOR EXECUTIVE(S) 2018 2018 (IN MILLIONS) (PORTION OF BILLINGS) RECENT PROJECTS/CLIENTS WSP USA 212-465-5000 Lou Cornell 797 27,058 $6,954.4 Construction mgmt.: 15% Kosciuszko Bridge for the state 1 Penn Plaza wsp.com Chief executive 819 26,950 Engineering: 83% Department of Transportation; 1 New York, NY 10119 Facility assessment: 2% 55 Hudson Yards for Related Cos. Thornton Tomasetti Inc. 917-661-7800 Peter DiMaggio, 336 980 $285.0 Architecture: 12% LaGuardia Airport Terminal B; 51 Madison Ave. thorntontomasetti.com Michael Squarzini 324 980 Engineering: 48% Sunnyside Yard New York, NY 10010 Co-chief executives Facility assessment: 35% 2 Thomas Scarangello Other:5% Executive chairman Langan 212-479-5400 David Gockel 313 571 $307.0 Engineering: 100%4 Hudson Square; Bronx Point 21 Penn Plaza langan.com President, chief executive 287 525 3 New York, NY 10001 STV 212-777-4400 Dominick Servedio 225 586 $582.5 Architecture: 30% Highbridge Interchange 225 Park Ave. South stvinc.com Executive chairman 229 440 Construction inspection: 5% rehabilitation design-build for New York, NY 10003 Construction mgmt.: 20% Posillico Civil Inc. and the state Engineering: 45% Department of Transportation; South Beach Psychiatric Center 4 new residential building for Dormitory Authority of the State of New York GPI Greenman-Pedersen Inc. 646-791-8800 Denise Carter 212 395 $300.8 Construction inspection: 25% George Washington Bridge 21 W. 38th St. gpinet.com Executive vice president, 207 381 Construction mgmt.: 35% rehabilitation construction New York, NY 10018 metro-area branch manager Engineering: 35% management; Bayonne Bridge 5 Facility assessment: 5% navigational clearance program construction management AECOM 212-973-2900 Denise Berger 200 10,750 $20,200.0 Architecture: 12% n/d 605 Third Ave.
    [Show full text]